Upload
lenaki3
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
1/19
1
A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism:Shostakovichs 5
th Symphony versus the
Shoddy Scholarship of Anti-Communist Re-Interpretation
David PearsonDecember, 2009
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
2/19
2
The dominant narrative on Shostakovich, found in CD liner notes, concert programs, and
even in scholarly articles is of a closeted dissident whose music is full of coded anti-communist
messages. Shostakovichs Symphony no. 5 op. 47 in particular is still generally considered to be
a work the composer was forced to write by the Soviet government against his creative desires,
and moreover as being a veiled protest against and ridicule of that government. These popular
misconceptions stem from Volkovs Testimony, a book shown to be a fraud (with the beginning
of each of its chapters virtually identical to writings previously published by Shostakovich)1, yet
whose arguments are still repeated even in academic circles. The truth about Shostakovich and
his Fifth Symphony is far from these misconceptions. Shostakovich was a musician with
tremendous artistic integrity, a sincere if critical commitment to the ideals of the Russian
Revolution, and a desire to create music that served and interacted with his audience.
Shostakovichs Fifth Symphony was an important leap forward in the composers artistic
development, a synthesis of the style he had developed up to that point and would continue to
elucidate for decades, and a work in line with the socialist realist aesthetic promoted in the
Soviet Union of the 1930s.
In order to understand the Fifth Symphony it is necessary to first briefly examine
Shostakovichs musical development in the preceding years and the developing policy towards
music in the Soviet Union. The 1920s was a period of tremendous musical exploration in the
Soviet Union as composers experimented with modernism, sought to put the ideas of the Russian
Revolution to music, and tried to connect their craft to a broad population that previously had
little access to it. Along with this experimentation went a destructive and fanatical factionalism,
most concentrated in the Russian Association of Proletarian Musicians2. Shostakovich never
allied himself with any faction, but explored different musical ideas, including those of
modernist European composers, developing a style in the late 1920s that was astringent,
satirical, and highly dissonant3. At the same time, Shostakovich explored more traditional
classical forms, exemplified in his first three symphonies. Boris Schwarz and Laurel Fay sum up
this period in Shostakovichs development as a split focus: concern for tradition against
1See for example Laurel Fay, Shostakovich versus Volkov: Whose Testimony?,Russian Review Vol. 39,
No. 4 (October 1980): pp. 484-493.2
Richard Taruskin,Defining Russia Musically (Princeton: University of Princeton Press, 2000), pp. 512-
513.3Boris Schwarz and Laurel Fay, Dimitri Shostakovich, The New Grove Russian Masters 2 (New York:
W.W. Norton & Co., 1986), pp. 176.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
3/19
3
challenge of it.4
Shostakovich was also influenced by the revolution and societal transformations around
him. Born on September 25, 1906 (September 12 old style), Shostakovich grew up with several
committed revolutionaries and radicals as close relatives, and in a household typical of
progressive intellectuals in St. Petersburg at the time.5
The 1917 revolution and subsequent civil
war took place during Shostakovichs youth, and its ideas and aspirations found their way into
Shostakovichs second and third symphonies (To October and The 1stof May) as well as
other compositions.6
As an artist, Shostakovich saw his role as tied up with the socialist
direction of his country and creating music that could connect with and serve the people. The
composer told aNew York Times reporter in 1931, There can be no music without ideology
We, as revolutionaries, have a different conception of music. Lenin himself said that music is
a means of unifying broad masses of peopleFor music has the power of stirring specific
emotionsMusic is no longer an end in itself, but a vital weapon in the struggle. Because of
this, Soviet music will probably develop along different lines from any the world has ever
known.7
Shostakovichs operaLady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District, popular from 1934-36,
concentrates much about the composers development up to that point. In its intended content,
Shostakovich was attempting to create an opera espousing Marxist philosophy and with an
aesthetic based on socialist realism and a modernist influence. To this end Shostakovich made
significant alterations to the story by Leskov on which the libretto is based. Katerina, the main
character, is transformed into a woman oppressed by the patriarchy of Tsarist Russian society,
and a sympathetic victim who resorts to murder as, in Shostakovichs words, a protest against
the tenor of the life she is forced to live, against the dark and suffocating atmosphere of the
merchant class in the last century8 Shostakovich explained that his own role as a Soviet
composer consists in approaching the story critically and in treating the subject from the Soviet
point of view, while keeping the strength of Leskovs original tale.9
Musically, Shostakovich
4Ibid., pp. 183-184.
5Victor Ilyich Seroff, Dimitri Shostakovich: The Life and Background of a Soviet Composer(New York:
Alfred A. Knopf, 1943), pp. 25-49.6
Schwarz and Fay, Dimitri Shostakovich, The New Grove Russian Masters 2, 176.7The New York Times, December 20, 1931, Dimitri Szostakovitch by Rose Lee, p. X8.
8Quoted in Taruskin, 501.
9 Quoted in Seroff, 249.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
4/19
4
describes making the opera very simple and expressive,10
using a melodic vocal line in
opposition to the theory, at one time popular with us, that modern opera should not have any
sustained vocal line, and that the vocal parts are nothing more than conversation in which the
intonation should be marked.11
In terms of form, Shostakovich explains that the music
progresses always on a symphonic plan12
rather than consisting of separate numbers (arias and
recitative). Lady Macbeth as a composition is both an application of Marxist philosophy,
socialist realist aesthetics (including a concern with making the opera accessible to a popular
audience), and with a definite modernist influence, with Bergs Wozzeckin particular influencing
both the form and style of the work.13
WhileLady Macbeth achieved popular success and was embraced by Soviet music critics
as an exemplification of socialist realism, in January of 1936 Pravda, the official newspaper of
the Communist Party, suddenly and sharply issued a scathing critique of the opera. 14 In its
article Chaos Instead of Music, Pravda criticizedLady Macbeth for its shallow construction,
lack emotional depth, and an unrelieved satirical tone,15
and while describing Shostakovich as a
talented composer, criticized him for formalism (a term that was used in very broad ways to
attack modernism in general, but which means to divorce form from content).16
The musical
community reacted by uncritically joiningPravdas criticism ofLady Macbeth, with no one in
the Union of Soviet Composers coming to Shostakovichs defense17
and composers turning to an
increasingly narrow definition of socialist realism. Socialist realism can be most simply defined
as art that could depict reality in its revolutionary development18
and connect with a wide
audience. As Soviet policy towards music developed in the 1930s, socialist realism came to be
defined as rejecting modernist experimentation wholesale, focusing exclusively on particular
forms (such as cantatas and symphonies), and deriving musical materials from folk melodies
(especially of non-Russian nationalities).19
10Ibid., 251.
11Ibid., 251.
12
Ibid., 251.13Norman Kay, Shostakovich (London: Oxford University Press, 1971), p. 28.
14Schwarz and Fay, Dimitri Shostakovich, The New Grove Russian Masters 2, 177.
15Quoted in Hugh Ottaway, Shostakovich Symphonies (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1978), p.
24.16
Francis Maes,A History of Russian Music: From Kamarinskaya to Babi Yar, trans. Arnold J. Pomerans
and Erica Pomerans (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2002), 128-129.17
Taruskin, 514-516.18
Maes, 110.19 Mark Evan Bonds,A History of Music in Western Culture, 2
nd Edition (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
5/19
5
The changes in Soviet policy towards music in the mid-1930s are often treated as though
they simply emerged out of the minds of a few government officials without reason or historical
context. While the errors in this policy, including its rigid insistence on certain forms, extolling
of folk melodies, one-sided rejection of modernism, and use of repression against those who
didnt adhere to this aesthetic should be criticized, it would also be wrong to ignore the historical
context. The Soviet Union was a country of many different nationalities that had been bitterly
oppressed under Tsarist rule, and the use of folk melodies of these diverse cultures was intended
as part of overcoming the subordination of non-Russian peoples. In terms of the about face on
Lady Macbeth in particular, the Soviet Union increasingly promoted Russian nationalism (in
ways that went against its professed communist ideology) in response to and as part of preparing
for the looming threat of invasion by Nazi Germany. Part and parcel of this promotion of
nationalism was a rehabilitation of the traditional family, which had been significantly
undermined after the revolution. By making a hero out of a woman who murdered her husband
and father-in-law, the libretto ofLady Macbeth did not fit well with the new political
atmosphere,20
nor did the open display of Katerinas sexuality in the music and staging of the
opera.21
Shostakovich was publicly silent in the face of this major criticism from Pravda. He
went on composing his Symphony No. 4, Op. 43, already in progress at the time.22
While the
anti-communist narrative would have it that this work was a continuation of Shostakovichs
creative path put to end by the Soviet government, more objective critics have shown this
symphony to be indicative of the transition the composer was undergoing at the time, refining his
craft and continuing to experiment with elements that would be better achieved in his Fifth
Symphony. Mahlers symphonies were becoming an influence on Shostakovich at this time, and
here this influence is a bit less refined.23
As the composer said, it suffered from
grandiosomania.24
And while modernism is certainly an element of the 4th
Symphony, this
work and others (such as the 24 Preludes for Piano, Op. 34 composed in 1932-3, the Concerto for
Piano, Trumpet and Strings, Op. 35 composed in 1933, and the Sonata for Cello and Piano, Op.
/ Prentice Hall, 2006), p. 605.20
Kay, pp. 25-26.21
Taruskin, 505.22
Ottaway, 19.23
Ibid., 24.24Quoted in Schwarz and Fay, Dimitri Shostakovich, The New Grove Russian Masters 2, 185.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
6/19
6
40 composed in 1934) composed by Shostakovich in the same period are more of a move away
from his fuller engagement with modernism in the late 1920s.25
Shostakovich ended up pulling
his Fourth Symphony from performance during rehearsal, and while it has been alleged he was
pressured to do so,26
even eighteen months before his death and long after the controversy over
Lady Macbeth, Shostakovich criticized his Fourth Symphony for its shallow construction and for
being too long, with too many imperfect, ostentatious elements in itand that he revised it
over a number of years, and even now I dont think Ive quite got it right.27
After the Fourth
Symphony, Shostakovich clearly saw the need for better organization of his symphonies and
eliminating excesses.28
Shostakovichs Fifth Symphony, premiered on November 21, 1937, was the composers
first new major composition to be performed afterPravdas criticism, and is a monumental work
that was met with critical acclaim in the late 1930s and continues to hold an important place in
the orchestral repertoire today.29
It is in D minor with four movements, the first movement a
moderato to allegro and back to moderato, the second movement a scherzo and trio, the third a
largo, and closing with a bombastic allegro finale. As a whole it is filled with an incredible
tension that is only finally resolved at the very end of the fourth movement.
Shostakovich could have easily played it safe in response to Pravdas criticisms and
composed a socialist cantata or something based on folk tunes.30
He instead composed a
symphony based on his own material, tonal yet full of dissonance, using elements he had been
criticized for (such as the satirical tone of the second movement), yet refining them and fitting
them organically to the symphony as a whole, and throughout rising to the challenge of creating
his best symphony yet. Though the subtitle A Soviet Artists Reply to Just Criticism did not
originate with Shostakovich, he nonetheless seems to have takenPravdas criticisms seriously, if
critically.31
In this respect he did not betray his artistic integrity and creative development while
also continuing to adhere to the socialist realist aesthetic. Shostakovich described his Fifth
25Ottaway, pp. 24-25.
26Laurel Fay, Shostakovich: A Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 95-96.
27Quoted in Ottaway, 19.
28Boris Schwarz,Music and Musical Life in Soviet Russia 1917-1970 (New York: W.W. Norton & Co.,
1972), p. 171.29
Schwarz and Fay, Dimitri Shostakovich, The New Grove Russian Masters 2, 185-186.30
Ottaway, 25.31 Ibid.,, 25.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
7/19
7
Symphony as being about the making of man,32
and the tension found throughout the way the
music goes through a transformative process up to its final resolution gives credence to this
description and fits in with the Marxist philosophy of dialectical materialism.
The opening phrase of the first movement (example 1) immediately gives the listener a
sense of tension and resolution. Here Shostakovich manages to define the D minor tonality
while pushing beyond its limitations, and immediately set the tone of tension and resolution
characteristic of the symphony as a whole through the gradually smaller intervals and the ending
on A (suggesting a cadence given the D minor key).33
Much of the material that will be used and
built upon throughout the movement is introduced in these first five measures.
Example 1: Dimitri Shostakovich, Symphony No. 5, Op. 47, Mvmt. 1, mm. 1-5.34
Besides obvious features such as the way the opening intervals in double dotted rhythms
are returned to in different ways throughout the movement and brought to even more frenzied
32Kay, 32.
33 Ibid., 33.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
8/19
8
heights, material from these measures is used for melodic and background figures throughout the
movement.35
The descending line in measure three, for example, is used in various
transformations, beginning in the second theme that is introduced right after the first theme, and
used often at the end of phrases and especially as part of fast runs during the allegro section (the
rhythm there is an eighth note and two sixteenths, but the musical idea is the same).
The simple rhythm the violins end with (two eighth notes on the upbeat leading to the
downbeat) find use as a background figure in various sections with drastic differences in mood.
The string section uses this rhythm as an accompaniment figure to a smooth melody introduced
in measure 51 at a piano dynamic using half notes and whole notes tied to a half note with wide
interval leaps (example 2a). As the tempo and nervous energy increase, this rhythm is doubled
(an eighth note and two sixteenths notes) and used as a background figure by various sections of
the orchestra that gives the movement a strong propulsion forward and an almost frantic quality
(example 2b). As the first movement winds down to a close, this background figure is used
again, this time back to two eighths on the upbeat leading into the downbeat, and serving to
decrease the tension rather than propel the music forward.
Example 2a: Dimitri Shostakovich, Symphony No. 5, Op. 47, Mvmt. 1, mm. 50-60.36
34Dimitri Shostakovich, Symphony No.5, Op. 47(London: Anglo-Soviet Press), pp. 3-4.
35Kay, 33-34.
36 Shostakovich, 8-9.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
9/19
9
Example 2b: Dimitri Shostakovich, Symphony No. 5, Op. 47, Mvmt. 1, mm. 176-177.37
The rising fourth (in this case A to D) with which this phrase ends is used throughout the
first movement, including in the third theme described above, and can be seen as a musical
expression signifying striving toward a goal. In the allegro section, the way the violins rise
higher in pitch using the dotted rhythms of the opening motif can also be interpreted as
conveying the same idea. This sense of striving continually meets with temporary defeat in the
music until the end of the finale.
The importance of this rather technical description of the myriad ways in which the
material of the opening measures is utilized and transformed is in how Shostakovich has created
tremendous organic connection within the first movement using very little material that is rather
simple in nature. Not only does this make for a well-organized symphony beyond
Shostakovichs previous work, it is also in line with a commitment to socialist realist aesthetics.
The simple material could be easily understood by a broad audience, and its transformations both
from melody to background material and vice versa and its use to convey differing moods are
quite palpable. Shostakovichs concern here is not with sonata form in a traditional academic
sense but rather with developing an organic and deeply inter-connected work that is capable of
conveying a variety of emotions and taking the listener on a profound musical journey. In this
endeavor he is tremendously successful.
The second phrase (example 2) both picks up on material from the first phrase and
continues to provide material for further development. It is introduced at a piano volume, and
the first two measures, given their slurred phrasing and slow unaccented rhythm, serve as
something of a respite from the dramatic tension of the first phrase without completely diffusing
the mood created. Later during the allegro middle section of the movement when these two
measures are played by the brass section at an accented fortissimo volume at double the rhythmic
value, they take on a whole new power, mood, and intensity and serve an entirely different
37Shostakovich, 22.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
10/19
10
purpose. As the energy is brought down at the end of this movement, these two measures are
played by the flute in inversion.
Example 3: Dimitri Shostakovich, Symphony No. 5, Op. 47, Mvmt. 1, mm. 6-12.38
The third measure of this phrase contains the first rising sixteenth note line which in this
case reaches a minor ninth above its starting pitch and resolves down by half step; a wonderfully
tense way to continue the idea of rising leaps, in this case the leap being both from the original
starting point and the diminished fifth between the apex and the proceeding sixteenth note. Here
the apex the melody reaches to does not seem a desirable goal to strive for, and is followed by a
descent downward over the next two measures. Longer rising sixteenth note runs which often
reach to dissonant places become integral to developing the nervous energy of the allegro
section. The descending figure (dotted eighth note and two thirty-second notes) is also used
prominently throughout the movement (though at faster tempos they become an eighth note
followed by two sixteenth notes).
The end of this second phrase (a rising eighth note, sixteenth note rest, and then sixteenth
note tied to the following eighth note) contains pitches drawn from an octatonic scale. Here
Shostakovich has managed to use modernist musical material without breaking out of the overall
tonal symphony and in a way that serves the musical purposes (had this line been a major or
minor scale it would have resolved the tension). This idea (both its rhythm and pitches) is used
in different ways as the nervous energy mounts throughout the movement. Interestingly, it bears
striking similarity to thematic material in the first movement of Schulhoffs Third Symphony,
composed in 1935 after turning towards pure socialist realism in his music after his visit to the
Soviet Union.39
Schulhoff composed the melody for the first movement of his Third Symphonyusing almost exclusively pitches from the octatonic scale, with a passage containing the exact
same rhythm and a similar contour to what Shostakovich used here. In addition, another part of
38Shostakovich, 4.
39Josef Bek, Schulhoff, Erwin, Grove Music Online,
http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com.proxy.wexler.hunter.cuny.edu/subscriber/article/grove/music/25128?q=schulhof
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
11/19
11
Schulhoffs melody bares a striking resemblance in its pitches, rhythm, and contour to the first
two measures of Shostakovichs second phrase, a resemblance made even more striking when
the trumpets use this motif and the octatonic motif back to back at measures 188-196.40
The second movement in Shostakovichs Fifth Symphony is a scherzo and trio in 3/4. Its
satirical style provides an important relief to the dramatic tension of the first movement. While it
could be alleged that the presence of a satirical style makes this symphony deliberately
ridiculous, this argument is overly simplistic. For one thing, if the entire symphony contained
the level of nervous tension attained in the first movement, it would be rather difficult to sit
through. Some contrast provided by a more light-hearted movement is necessary (including to
bring back the tension in the following movement). In contrast to the use of this satirical style in
previous works, Hugh Ottaway notes that For Shostakovich the achievement lay in writing such
a movement without indulging in grotesqueness and eccentricity. There is a genuine gaiety here,
and a sense of fun rather than satire; the ideas and their treatment are perfectly to scale, and the
three-part design comes out in one.41
That Shostakovich was able to refine the satirical
dimension of his compositional style and include this element in the Fifth Symphony is testament
to the way this work represents an advance in Shostakovichs development, and to his ability to
push beyond while still being within the limits being imposed in the name of socialist realism at
the time.
The third movement, a largo in F# minor, displays Shostakovichs sensitive introspective
side. It does not use the brass and in this respect provides contrast with the powerful drive of the
other movements. Like the first movement, the themes display a wide range of expressions
depending on how the composer decides to use them. The movement as a whole has a deeply
introspective character to it, often with a feeling of despair. Taking the meaning of the
symphony as the making of man, this movement would be analogous to the dark hour before
dawn, where the tension of the first movement has taken its toll, and the music indicates a
reflection on the struggle going on.
The fourth movement, an allegro non troppo in D minor, suddenly breaks the mood of
the largo and begins an intense march toward its conclusion. The much repeated claim that the
f&search=quick&pos=1&_start=1#firsthit,accessed 12/11/09.40
Based on my transcriptions of Ervin Schulhoff, Symphonies 1-3, Philharmonia Hungarica, cond. George
Alexander Albrecht (Classic Produktion Osnabruck 999 251-2, 1994).41 Ottaway, 27-28.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
12/19
12
ending in D major was simply a parody of the optimism demanded of socialist realist music is
too often the only thing people associate with Shostakovichs Fifth Symphony. But if one really
listens to this finale with unbiased ears, one can hear how this D major conclusion isnt a parody,
but rather is hinted at throughout the whole movement and built up to with incredible
compositional skill.42
This drive towards a conclusion is immediately established by the timpani
A-D to the ascending brass line that begins this finale and carried on with the theme introduced
by the woodwinds and first violins at measure 11. Unlike in the first movement, the tension
created in this movement does not close in on itself (as it does quite literally in the first phrase of
the first movement), but rather strives toward a resolution.
The first hint at this resolution is heard in a lyrical melody introduced by the trumpet solo
at measure 83 (example 3). Especially in contrast to the material so far, this melody has a
definite optimistic, dreamy character to it. When it is first introduced by the trumpet, it sharply
contrasts with the unresolved tension of the sixteenth note passages in the woodwinds and
strings. The orchestra then builds towards a climactic moment with the first violins repeating E6
sixteenth notes and the woodwinds playing a similar idea, the brass playing a descending line
towards a reiterated dotted quarter note - triplet sixteenth notes figure, and the tuba, bassoons,
and cellos picking up where the descending brass line left off. What bursts forth from this
climax is the optimistic lyrical melody that was introduced by the solo trumpet, this time played
by the violins, violas, and upper woodwinds (the latter at a triple forte dynamic). This moment
of optimistic joy ends with the lyrical melody overpowered by the orchestra and disappearing,
and when the orchestra seems to crash in on itself the trombones and horns play a repeated figure
of two eighth notes leading to a quarter note on a repeated pitch (reminiscent of the background
figure used in the first movement).
Example 4: Dimitri Shostakovich, Symphony No. 5, Op. 47, Mvmt. 3, mm. 81-87.43
The orchestra stays in this mood of despair and then gradually builds back up the tense
drive to the end. As the orchestra nears the D major conclusion, the character of the tension,
unlike throughout the rest of the symphony, is one demanding resolution, reaching an intense
42Ottaway, 28.
43 Shostakovich, 122-123.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
13/19
13
dissonance by having every instrument not playing an A playing some leading tone towards a
note in the D major triad. When the D major end is reached, the brass bring back the ascending
motif from the very beginning of the fourth movement, this time in major instead of minor. The
woodwinds and strings play repeated high-pitched eighth notes, and the brass finally ends by
powerfully reiterating the D major triad. In contrast to the dreamy character of the optimistic
lyrical theme in the middle of this movement, the D major ending sounds firm and conclusive.
There is also a way in which this D major ending sounds as though it bursts through the tension.
While this has been argued as evidence that the D major ending is forced, given the theme of
struggle throughout the whole symphony it is not difficult to understand this bursting through
quality as expressing the final push over obstacles to succeed in the struggle that has went on
since the opening measures of the first movement.
Besides the elements within the composition of this movement described above that drive
towards this D major conclusion, it is also worth noting that this kind of ending is not out of
character with the symphonies Shostakovich was influenced by. Mahler, whose symphonies had
a major impact on Shostakovich in the 1930s, ended his First Symphony in a similar manner.44
One can also take this triumphant finale as fitting within a tradition of Fifth Symphony endings
that includes those of Beethoven and Tchaikovsky45
(though these composers do not get the
same stigma attached to them for their triumphant finales). Given the incredible tension and
nervous energy of Shostakovichs Fifth Symphony, there is no way anything but an overly
powerful and repetitive resolution to this tension would suffice.
While the above musical analysis of Shostakovichs Fifth Symphony, his own published
views and explanations of his music, and the overall context point to Shostakovich being a
highly developed composer committed in broad terms to making socialist realist music (while
likely critical of many of its particular applications), the more popularly known story around the
Fifth Symphony is the opposite. Such a re-interpretation of Shostakovich has taken place in
order to repackage one of the greatest composers of the twentieth century as a closeted Soviet
dissident, because to define him any other way would not be in line with the anti-communist
narrative of those doing the re-interpreting. This repackaging has involved rather simplistic
rationalizations and often blatant inaccuracies.
44Schwarz, 172.
45 Taruskin, 533.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
14/19
14
Volkovs claim that you have to be a complete oaf46
not to hear the D major ending to
the Fifth Symphony as a forced parody has been refuted with the above analysis of the finale.
Others have attempted to point to specific musical elements as represent ing Shostakovichs scorn
for particular aspects of the Soviet government. Richard Taruskin points out the blatant error in
one such attempt by Ian MacDonald. MacDonald claimed that in a passage of the Fifth
Symphony in which the melody is given to the flute and horn, Shostakovich is obviously making
a parody of government officials who were uncritically obedient to Stalin by having the horn
reach up to a high pitch. Taruskin points out that in the score, Shostakovich writes that the horn
should play this note down an octave if it needs to, indicating that Shostakovich does not intend
this to come off sounding like a parody.47
More important than particular examples, however, is the problem with the reductionist
methodology applied by such critics as MacDonald. Shostakovich himself opposed such
methodology when it was applied in the Soviet Union, writing in 1933 that When a critic
writes that in such-and-such a symphony the Soviet civil servants are represented by the oboe
and the clarinet, and Red Army men by the brass section, then you want to scream!48
Since
musical elements in and of themselves can be interpreted in different ways by different listeners,
it is necessary to look at contexts in which music was composed and to the extent possible
ascertain the intentions of the composer.
In order to obfuscate the context of Shostakovichs music, attempts have been made to
generalize its meaning and then fit it in to an anti-communist narrative. Through this lens, in the
Fifth Symphony the making of man becomes the struggle against Stalin (which somehow of
course the leaders of the Soviet Union failed to notice).
Francis Maes points out an erroneous way in which Karen Kopp attempts such a
generalization of meaning and a subsequent re-interpretation of Shostakovichs Eleventh
Symphony, The Year 1905. Kopp generalizes the meaning of Shostakovichs explicit
dedication to the 1905 revolution as a struggle of freedom against tyranny, and then claims that
Shostakovich meant this to be applied as a protest against the Soviet intervention in Hungary that
took place a year before the Eleventh Symphony was composed. Kopp backs up her argument
46Solomon Volkov, Testimony: The Memoirs of Dimitri Shostakovich(New York: Harper & Row
Publishers, Inc., 1979), 183.47
Taruskin, 538-539.48 Quoted in Maes, 348-349.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
15/19
15
with the fact that a melody from Polish Workers Party song about independence from Tsarist
Russia makes this connection with Hungary definite. Such a leap of imagination completely
ignores Shostakovichs explicit reference to a particular historical event with an en tirely different
context than the 1956 intervention in Hungary.49
Such abstract universalism has stripped music of its intended meaning and historical
context in order for it to be more easily fit with the prevailing ideology and not challenge us to
think deeply about what the music is saying. Were Beethovens music to go down in history as
the soundtrack to the French Reign of Terror it would be difficult to promote him in the present
Western political order in which the excesses of the most radical wing of the French revolution
are condemned (and while obviously this is an exaggeration of Beethovens views and the role of
his music, his sympathies for the French Revolution are well established). Some would have us
believe that Shostakovichs war symphonies (Nos. 7 and 8) were really a condemnation of Stalin
rather than the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union, even though an objective look at the historical
context shows that even the most bitter enemies of the Russian Revolution supported the Soviet
Union against Nazi Germany during the war,50
and it would be hard to believe that
Shostakovichs main thoughts while enduring German bombing of Leningrad were about Stalin.
While it is of course possible to take any piece of music and give it new meaning by fitting it in a
different context, it is dishonest to claim that somehow this was the intended meaning of the
composer all along, or to deny the specific extra-musical content a composer gave to their work.
The particular obsession with finding the ways in which Shostakovichs creativity was
repressed in the Soviet Union has not yet been generalized to look at the struggle of freedom
against tyranny throughout the development of music in Western culture, which, among other
things would point to the ways in which religious authorities determined much about what music
was allowed and what was suppressed in Europe for several centuries.
What is most unfortunate in the case of Shostakovich is the way in which the biased and
often erroneous information from authors such as Volkov and MacDonald has become popular
knowledge about the composer, even after it has been refuted. Francis Maes argues that this has
much to do with the operation of the functioning of the music market. The symphony and the
string quartet remain as the two most important commercial institutions in classical music.
49Maes, 349-350.
50 Taruskin, 496.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
16/19
16
While the Western avante-garde rejected these institutions, in the Soviet Union they were
promoted. In the 1970s, as orchestras and string quartets looked for new music to perform, the
works of Shostakovich were the logical place to turn. But in order to promote the music of a
Soviet composer in the two most important commercial institutions of classical music in the
West, Maes argues that it was necessary to strip his music of its communist content and re-
package him as a secret dissident.51
While Maes makes an important point here in regard to market mechanisms, it would
also be wrong to reduce the repackaging of Shostakovich as an anti-communist dissident to
simply the operations of the music market. Such a view denies that Western liberal democracy
promotes a specific ideology (and thus is inherently superior to countries such as the Soviet
Union that did openly promote a specific ideology). Moreover, such a view fails to see the
connection between the re-interpretation of Shostakovich with the general wave of anti-
communism that has been so promoted in the United States in recent decades. Why else would
Volkovs bookTestimony receive such favorable reviews from major newspapers that
subsequently ignored the factual errors in the book and evidence of it being a fraud?52
As
American capitalism has emerged triumphant, critical thought has been discarded when it comes
to challenges to the notion that liberal democracy is the best possible world.
A key component of ideology actively promoted in liberal democracies is the notion of
individual freedom as the most important right. Perhaps this is why it is so difficult to get an
objective understanding of Shostakovich. If one evaluates artistry with individual freedom as the
most important criteria, it would be impossible to understand a composer who was so devoted to
connecting his music to a mass audience and his desire to make music that could help push
forward the ideals of the Russian Revolution. It would also be impossible to understand the need
to give that segment of the population that has been denied it the right to participate in and
enjoy music of the quality composed by such musicians as Shostakovich. While in liberal
democracies many achievements were made over the last century in developing the creative
capacity of music to explore new directions, this has went along with a situation in which such
creativity is increasingly the preserve of music departments on college campuses, with no
connection to a broader audience and no effect on the broader society. Shostakovich would have
51Maes, 345-348.
52Laurel Fay, Shostakovich versus Volkov: Whose Testimony?, Russian Review Vol. 39, No. 4, p. 484.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
17/19
17
deplored this situation.
Such a view also fails to recognize the positive role constraint can play in creative
development. After composing theRite of Spring, Stravinsky recognized the problem created by
the opening up of so many possibilities with the advent of modernism and began imposing
constraints on himself (such as instrumentation and particular sounds) before beginning a new
composition. As he explained, the more constraints one imposes, the more one frees oneself of
the chains that shackle the spirit.53
J.S. Bach had to devote much of his creative energies to
composing cantatas for the church at which he was employed, and many of these cantatas are
celebrated today as works of musical genius (and the church is not castigated for having confined
Bachs skills to this genre). In Shostakovichs case, constraint may have led him to a more
serious and refined engagement with the symphonic form, and resulted in several of the greatest
orchestral works of the twentieth century. While he may have created great operas had it not
been forPravdas condemnation ofLady Macbeth, in answer to the socialist realist aesthetic
demanded of composers (and likely with some degree of unity, even if a critical unity, with this
aesthetic), Shostakovich succeeded in taking the symphonic form to new heights and refining his
own skill. Shostakovich stands out among Soviet composers exactly because he was adept at
working within government policy without being slavish towards it.
Socialist realism in the Soviet Union failed to nurture creative capacity and
experimentation from most of its composers in part because it failed to understand the role art
can play not only in bringing people together and celebrating progress, but also in challenging
society with new ideas and new ways of thinking, and to thinking critically in its own right.
Furthermore, as particular definitions of socialist realism emerged from the Soviet government in
the 1930s, these narrowly attached aesthetics to government policy (and the more wrong these
government policies were the worse the aesthetics demanded became). A telling example of this
trend taken to extremes was with Prokofievs music to the filmAlexander Nevsky. Directed by
Sergei Eisenstein, the film depicted the defeat of the Teutonic knights that invaded Russia in the
thirteenth century. The film was created when the threat of invasion by Nazi Germany was a
grave concern in the Soviet Union, and as a historical reference to resistance to German invasion,
was at first promoted for its patriotism. Prokofievs music for the film was likewise celebrated
as being a good example of the socialist realist aesthetic. But when the Soviet Union signed a
53 Igor Stravinsky, Poetics of Music (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970), 49.
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
18/19
18
non-aggression pact with Germany, the film was no longer shown.54
Such an erroneous
approach was one reason forPravdas condemnation ofLady Macbeth. Nonetheless it would be
wrong to take these changing policies on musical aesthetics out of historical contexts. Insisting
that all music be optimistic might sound ridiculous in the abstract, but to a country facing the
threat of war from Nazi Germany (whose military might far exceeded the Soviet Union in the
1930s) and with no allies to rely on, demanding optimistic music sounds quite rational (and such
optimism would in fact be quite necessary for the Soviet Union to defeat Nazi Germany in World
War II).
For all the critiques that can be made of the actual policies of socialist realism in music in
the Soviet Union of the 1930s, the central ideas of this aesthetic, namely that music connect
with a broad audience and help move society in a radical direction forward, remain valid and
almost completely missing from most art music today. As much as the shoddy scholarship of
anti-communist re-interpretation would deny it, perhaps one of the main reasons Shostakovichs
music remains so popular today is because he managed to apply these central ideas of socialist
realist aesthetics with such tremendous compositional skill in his Fifth Symphony and many
other works.
54Bonds, 604-606
8/3/2019 A Critical Defense of Socialist Realism
19/19
19
Bibliography
Bek, Josef. Schulhoff, Erwin, Grove Music Online,
http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com.proxy.wexler.hunter.cuny.edu/subscriber/article/grov
e/music/25128?q=schulhoff&search=quick&pos=1&_start=1#firsthit, accessed 12/11/09.
Bonds, Mark Evan. A History of Music in Western Culture, 2nd
Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson / Prentice Hall, 2006.
Fay, Laurel. Shostakovich: A Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Fay, Laurel. Shostakovich versus Volkov: Whose Testimony?Russian Review Vol. 39, No. 4(October, 1980): pp. 484-493.
Kay, Norman. Shostakovich. London: Oxford University Press, 1971.
Maes, Francis.A History of Russian Music: From Kamarinskaya to Babi Yar, trans. Arnold J.
Pomerans and Erica Pomerans. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California
Press, 2002.
Ottaway, Hugh. Shostakovich Symphonies. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1978.
Schulhoff, Ervin. Symphonies 1-3, Philharmonia Hungarica, cond. George Alexander Albrecht.Classic Produktion Osnabruck 999 251-2, 1994.
Schwarz, Boris.Music and Musical Life in Soviet Russia 1917-1970. New York: W.W. Norton& Co., 1972.
Schwarz, Boris, and Faye, Laurel. Dimitry Shostakovich. The New Grove Russian Masters 2,
pp. 175-231. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1986.
Shostakovich, Dimitri. Symphony No. 5, Op. 47. London: Anglo-Soviet Music Press.
Seroff, Victor Ilyich.Dimitri Shostakovich: The Life and Background of a Soviet Composer.
New York: Alfred A Knopf, 1943.
Stravinsky, Igor. Poetics of Music. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970.
Taruskin, Richard.Defining Russia Musically. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
Volkov, Solomon. Testimony: The Memoirs of Dimitri Shostakovich. New York: Harper & Row
Publishers, Inc., 1979.