Upload
field
View
41
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A Conceptual Framework for Linking Climate Science with Management. July 14, 2014 SCB, Missoula, MT. Climate Change Response Program National Park Service. Pinyon mortality at Bandelier National Monument. Photo: Craig Allen. What should we do?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
A Conceptual Framework for Linking Climate Science with Management
Climate Change Response Program National Park Service
July 14, 2014SCB, Missoula, MT
John Gross Andy HansenTom Olliff Bill MonahanDave Theobald Forrest MeltonScott Goetz Nathan PiekielekTony Chang Patrick Jantz
Pinyon mortality at Bandelier National Monument. Photo: Craig Allen
Pinyon mortality at Bandelier National Monument. Photo: Craig Allen
What should we do?
4
Mitigation: Reducing causes of climate change, mostly reducing GHGs.
Adaptation: Adjusting to and coping with actual or expected climate changes.
Managing Natural Resources under Climate Change
• Time horizon longer than planning and management horizons
• Relevant areas larger than management units
• High uncertainties in science (climate change, ecological response) and management effectiveness
• Coordination among multiple management units and jurisdictions
• Approach and methods rapidly evolving
Challenges
GoalDemonstrate the four steps of a climate adaptation planning strategy using NASA and other data and models, in two LCCs.
1. Identify Conservation Targets
2. Assess Vulnerability To Climate Change
4. ImplementManagementOptions
3. IdentifyManagementOptions
Monitor, Review, Revise
(Stein & Glick 2011)
Landscape Climate Change Vulnerability Project (LCC-VP)
NASA Applied Sciences Program
Project Team (LCC-VP) Montana State University
A. Hansen, N. Piekielek, T. Chang, L. Phillips, E. Garroutte
NPS / Great Northern LCC T. Olliff
NPS I&M & CCRP ProgramsB. Monahan, J. Gross
CSU Monterey Bay / NASA AmesF. Melton, W. Wang
Conservation Science PartnersD. Theobald
Woods Hole Research CenterS. Goetz, P. Jantz, T. Cormier,
S. ZolkosGreat Smoky Mountain NP
Western US
• Great Northern LCC - Tom Olliff
• NPS I&M Greater Yellowstone Network - Kristen Legg
• NPS I&M Rocky Mountain Network - Mike Britten
• Greater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee Whitebark Pine Subcommittee - Karl Buermeyer & Virginia Kelly
• Grand Teton National Park - Kelly McClosky
• Yellowstone National Park - Ann Rodman
• Rocky Mountain National Park - Ben Bobowski
Eastern US
• NPS I&M Appalachian Highlands Network - Robert Emmott
• NPS I&M Eastern Rivers and Mountains Network - Matt Marshall
• NPS I&M Mid-Atlantic Network - Jim Comiskey
• Delaware Water Gap National Recreational Area - Richard Evans & Leslie Morelock
• Great Smoky Mountains National Park - Jim Renfro
• Shenandoah National Park - Jim Schaberl
Agency Collaborations
SYM 7 Wildland Ecosystems Under Climate Change: Pioneering Approaches to Science and Management in the US Northern Rockies and
Appalachians
A conceptual framework for linking climate science with managementJohn Gross, NPS
Exposure across the GNLCC and APLCC: Climate, land use, ecosystem process Forrest Melton, NASA Ames and CA State University
Potential impacts of climate change on vegetation in the Appalachian LCCPatrick Jantz, Woods Hole Research Center
Potential impact of climate change on vegetation in the Great Northern LCC Andy Hansen, Montana State University
Tree and shrub species habitat suitability across Greater Yellowstone under climate change
Nathan Piekielek, Montana State University
Climate change management evaluation and implementation, with a focus on whitebark pine
Tom Olliff, Great Northern LCC
Panel: Linking climate science and management discussion panel: Key opportunities and challenges in protected areas.
Bill Monahan NPS (Moderator)Ben Bobowski Rocky Mountain NPDave Hallac Yellowstone NPVirginia Kelly Greater Yellowstone Coordinating CommitteePatrick Jantz Shenandoah National Park / Woods Hole
SYM 7 Wildland Ecosystems Under Climate Change: Pioneering Approaches to Science and Management in the US Northern Rockies and
Appalachians
- Reduce Exposure- Reduce Sensitivity- Increase Adaptive Capacity
- Exposure- Sensitivity- Adaptive Capacity
- Species- Ecosystem- Biomes
- Policy- Practice- Institutional Changes
1. Identify Conservation Targets
2. Assess Vulnerability To Climate Change
4. ImplementManagementOptions
3. IdentifyManagementOptions
Monitor, Review, Revise
From: Stein and Glick 2011. Chapter 1. Introduction in Scanning the Conservation Horizon: A guide to climate change vulnerability assessment. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC.
Revisit planning as needed
Adjust actions as
needed
Re-assess vulnerability as needed
1. Identify conservation
goals and objectives
2. Assess climate impacts and
vulnerabilities
3. Review/revise conservation
goals and objectives
4. Identify adaptation
options
5. Evaluate and prioritize
adaptation actions
6. Implement priority adaptation
actions
7. Track action effectiveness and
ecological responses
Generalized Adaptation Framework
Stein et al. 2014. Climate-Smart Conservation: Putting Adaptation Principles into Practice
13
Identify conservation targets
• What’s going to be different in the future?• How does CC challenge existing goals? • Which high priority resources should be the focus?
14
CC issues identified by collaborators :
• Access to existing and emerging knowledge • Projections for dominant forest types and systems• 5-needle pines (whitebark, limber pine)• Cove forests, eastern spruce-fir, other hardwoods
15
Vulnerability
Potential Impact
Adaptive Capacity
Exposure Sensitivity
What’s at risk and why?
Assessing Vulnerability
Exposure of US National Parks to Land Use and Climate Change 1900-2100 Hansen et al. 2014 Ecological Applications
1. Define the surrounding Protected Area CenteredEcosystem (PACE; Hansen et al.
2011).
2. Quantify past exposure.
1900-2010
Vulnerability
Potential Impact
Adaptive Capacity
Exposure SensitivityLand Use ChangeClimate ChangeInvasive Species
1900-2000
Assessing Vulnerability
Exposure of US National Parks to Land Use and Climate Change 1900-2100 Hansen et al. 2014 Ecological Applications
1. Define the surrounding Protected Area CenteredEcosystem (PACE; Hansen et al.
2011).
2. Quantify past exposure.
3. Quantify potential future exposure and potential impact.
4. Consider implications for management.
2010-2100
Vulnerability
Potential Impact
Adaptive Capacity
Exposure SensitivityLand Use ChangeClimate Change
Potential Biome Type
19
Ecological Forecasting
20
Multi-scale assessment of vulnerability
Species Ecological System LCC-Scale
Exposure CC Projections;TOPS variables
CC Projections;TOPS variables
CC Projections;TOPS variables
Sensitivity SDMs;Life history traits
Climate variation;LPJ modeling
Biome BGC responses; NPP
controls
Adaptive Capacity
Species & habitat traits;
Life history traits
Connectivity;Refugia;
Topography
ES diversity; Connectivity;Land forms
21
Informing Resource Management DecisionCollaboration with GYCC WBP Subcommittee
Whitebark pine VA feeds into adaptation process
• Use forecasts to evaluate current strategy
• Identify new options based on forecasts and potential responses
22
Questions?
• Comprehensive framework for adaptation• Applying multi-scale, state-of-the-art science
to resource management• Expect end-to-end accomplishments