28
A Comprehensive Study of Manufactu~ers In-Use Testing Data Collected from Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines Using Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) 29 th CRC Real Wor/,d Emissions Workshop Long Beach, California March 10 -13, 2019 Authors: Fakhri Hamady, Allen Duncan Presented by: Allen Duncan Office of Transportation and Air Quality U.S. EPA A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In - Use Testing Data Collected from Heavy - Duty Diesel Engines Using Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) Authors: Fakhri Hamady, Allen Duncan Presented by: Allen Duncan Office of Transportation and Air Quality U.S. EPA 29 th CRC Real World Emissions Workshop Long Beach, California March 10 - 13, 2019 FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

A Comprehensive Study of Manufactu~ers In-Use Testing Data Collected from Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines Using Portable

Emissions Measurement System (PEMS)

29 th CRC Real Wor/,d Emissions Workshop Long Beach, California

March 10 -13, 2019

Authors: Fakhri Hamady, Allen Duncan

Presented by: Allen Duncan

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

U.S. EPA

A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data Collected from Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines Using Portable

Emissions Measurement System (PEMS)

Authors: Fakhri Hamady, Allen Duncan Presented by: Allen Duncan

Office of Transportation and Air Quality U.S. EPA

29th CRC Real World Emissions Workshop Long Beach, California

March 10 -13, 2019

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Page 2: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States .-,., Environmental Protection ,, Agency

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Overview

Manufacturer-Run In-Use Testing Program - Established in 2005

Manufacturers (MFRs) Test Order Selection of Engine Families How Does This Program Work?

In-Use Data Processing and Statistical Analyses to Determine:

Vehicle Testing Dates Not-To-Exceed (NTE) Control Area Vehicle Operation Valid NTE Events, and Vehicle-Pass Ratio Overall Average Emissions Heavy-Duty In-Use Testing Details

Data Summary

Conclusions and Recommendations

APPENDIX

2 2

Page 3: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States .-,., Environmental Protection ,, Agency

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Manufacturer-Run In-Use Testing Program

Manufacturers Test Order Selection of Engine Families

Over any four-year period, EPA will not select more than the average number of engine families that manufacturers have certified over that four-year period. Manufacturers are notified in writing by June 30 of the applicable calendar year about the Test Order, and have 18 months to complete their testing and report results to EPA.

Selection of engine families is a cooperative effort between EPA and CARB staff, and it’s based on information collected from engine certification data, compliance reports, previous in-use testing, and defect and recall reports, etc..

How does this program work? 40 CFR part 86, Subpart T, provides detailed on manufacturer run in-use testing program.

3 3

Page 4: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

'C 12 Cl.I 10 vi 10 Cl.I I-ti)

8 Cl.I (.)

.c: 6 ~ It-0 4 ... Cl.I .c E 2 :::::, z

0 ::;; " " " ..., ..., ..., .. ~ .. ~ ;i,.;; ~

-!::' ~- ~ q,• ~ -¥- I §

I ....

::;; ~ ~ ~ " ~ ':"' ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ..., ~ tl .. !. ' ~

!. '-~ ~ ~ ~ G, .. ,

,Q '-' f f & QI ~ -0 (j

f: &' ~ ~ ,f .g

FMFR6-MDEFN1 FMFR6-MDEFN1 EMFR2- HDEFN1 EMFR1- HDEFN3 EMFR1-HDEFN2 FMFR7-HDEFN1 EMFR1-HDEFN2 EMFR1- HDEFN2 DMFR1-MDEFN1 DMFR1-MDEFN1

FMFR6-MDEFN1 FMFR6-MDEFN1 EMFR2-HDEFN1 EMFR1-HDEFN3 EMFR1-HDEFN2

EMFRS-HDEFNl EMFR2- HDEFN1 EMFR1-HDEFN3 EMFR3--MDEFN1

EMFR5-HDEFN1 EMFR2-HDEFN1 EMFR1- HDEFN3 EMFR3-MDEFN1

EMFR2- HDEFN1 EMFR1-HDEFN3 EMFR3-MDEFN1 EMFR3-MDEFN1

EMFR3-MDEFN1

EMFR5-HDEFN1

FMFR6-MDEFN1

FMFR7-HDEFN1

EMFR1-HDEFN2 EMFR4~LDEFN1 DMFR1-MDEFN1 DMFR1-MDEFN1

EMFR1-HDEFN2

EMFR4-LDEFN1

EMFR4-LDEFN1 EMFR4-LDEFN1

EMFR4-LDEFN1

FMFR7-HDEFN1

FMFR7-H DEFNl

DMFR1-MDEFN1

EMFR4-LDEFN1

EMFR5-HDEFN1 EMFR5-HDEFN1

EMFR5-HDEFN1

FMFR7-HDEFN1

Test Dates/Engine Family Names

Data Processing and Statistical Analyses

Vehicle, Engine Family and Testing Dates for Manufacturers 2016 Test Order

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 4 4

Page 5: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

2000

1800

1600

1400

~ 1200 !

,t: -Gl Jl!:000 :, CJ' I.,

i9 800

600

400

200

0

500 700 900

INllE Control A ea (or Zone)

110() 13001 150() 1700 19001 2100

Engine Speed (rp,m)

• Average lorque (over 50 sec)

- 1 orque Curve

- RPM Lower Bound 15% ESC Speed

- 1 orque Lower Bound at 30% Max l orque

- Torque Lower Bound at 30% Max Power

Data Processing and Statistical Analyses

NTE Control Area - Engine Family Name: EMFR1-HDEFN3, Vocational Truck

Torque = %Load * Max Torque

Valid NTE event duration is at least 30 seconds of vehicle continuous operation in the NTE zone with all exclusion set in the current regulation are applied

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 5 5

Page 6: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~

(1ii

0

0.1

tos

Sto

10

to to

15

15 to

20

[ 2

0to

,25

ci, .:g 2

5 to

30,

c'D

c'D

a.

3,0

to 3

5

::a

m

~ 35

to4

0 " - ~ 4

0to

45

:c

-4

5 to

so

.SO

to5

5

ss to

6o

60

to6

5

65 to

?o

7:o to

75

Q

.._e

0 ....

..

i:..n

~

0 '

P,er

c,en

t ,of

Veh

icle

Ope

r,atio

n

.....

.....

t\.)

Q

i:.

.n

0 "cf

?. ~

0 ~

0

2 C

..

!JI.

£1 .:

:Jo/o

-,

.u

. ,

0

~0

.t:l'o

/o

I 0

.19%

-

7_,j

'o/o

~ 0

.46%

~

-2"/

o

~

0.5

6%

-1

Jr'Y

o

~

0.8

0%

~-

:'Yo

~.9

7%

-1

1_%

~

1.81

0; 0

0 ■

., L

J . ,,

, ~ ~ ~ ~

5.s

a a

a a

-1

.Cl"'

lO

1 :;§:

~

g 7

Q

~

t:!.l

~

3.

4%

~

~ ~

1'15

;,_1

%

0 ~

: .8

3%

8 9

~ _j

o/o

_J

I,

6.9

8~o

lj .7

'3/o 7.61

%

14 .8

'3/o

1 .4

1 %

1 ~ .U

'7o

=

.·_

22.1

_,

. ...:

:"'lo

814

2%

l :i .

~ o

...J

16.2

2%

t\.)

i:.

.n ~

0

o~

m ;g l>

mc:

cc

::J

:::,

CD

<;:

;:

::I :;

·Cl)

O O

Q.

'<::

Jen

3s

r CD

,.._

::I

CD

[Ill

'1J a .... CD

0 ~

0 ::J

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Data Processing and Statistical Analyses

Each Vehicle has a Distinctive Operation Profile – Engine Family Name: EMFR1-HDEFN3, Vocational Truck

Test Time = 13 hr.

Mass NOX = 340 g

Mass of CO2 = 873917 g

Diesel Fuel = 85.85 gallons

Work = 1727 hp-hr

For 0 - 50 MPH: Mass of NOX is about 42% Mass of CO2 is about 27% Work is about 25%

6 6

Page 7: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

Pass Ratios Macro MFR/XML NTEE Min. Time= 30 sec and at 30% Max. Power Calculated Reported

NMHC Pass Ratio: 1.00 1.00 CO Pass Ratio: 1.00 1.00 NOx Pass Ratio: 1.00 1.00 NOx & NMHC Pass Ratio: N/A N/A PM pass ratio: 1.00 1.00 # of NTE Events: 37 38

Emissions Summary Total Emissions (g)

Total Work Gallon of NTEE Min. Time = 30 sec, at 30% Max. Power (hp-hr) Diesel Fuel

( ) ( ) Total Throughout Test: 47,471 100.0% 340.33 5.90 626.85 873,916.64 2.45 1,727.03 85.85

Percent of Total Emissions and Work Percent of: Time (sec) Time(%) NOx NMHC co CO2 PM Work Fuel Total outside of "Basic" NTE Control Area: 30,080 63.4% 27.3% 64.9% 36.2% 20.6% 63.8% 15.3% 17.65 Total in "Basic" NTE Control Area (w/o exclusions): 17,391 36.6% 72.7% 35.1% 63.8% 79.4% 36.2% 84.7% 68.20

Exclusion 6 (Deficiency): 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Exclusion 7 (EMD/OBD): 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Exclusion 8 (EGR/Cold Temp Operation): 11,563 24.4% 50.9% 18.7% 39.3% 50.3% 17.1% 53.7% 43.15 Exclusion 9 (Aftertreatment/Low Temp Operation): 2,522 5.3% 24.6% 16.8% 8.3% 9.6% 1.7% 10.2% 8.22 Exclusion 10 (Altitude/Amb Temp): 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Exclusion 11 (Zero Check): 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total in NTE Control Area (w/ exclusions applied): 5,270 11.1% 13.4% 4.2% 22.5% 26.9% 17.9% 28.6% 23.10 Total in NTE Control Area with L TR flag: 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total in "Basic" NTE w/o excl with Regen flag: 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total of Valid NTE Events in NTE Control Area: 2,431 5.1% 7.3% 0.7% 10.8% 14.4% 10.3% 15.3% 12.40

Data Processing and Statistical Analyses (2016 Test Order)

Valid NTE Events and Vehicle-Pass Ratio - Engine Family Name: EMFR1-HDEFN3, Vocational Truck

Calculated and MFR reported Vehicle-Pass Ratios with all exclusions applied as set in the current EPA regulation.

Percent of emissions, work and diesel fuel inside and outside the NTE control area.

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 7 7

Page 8: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

Pass Ratios - No EGR/Cold Temp Operation Macro MFR/XML NTEE Min. Time= 30 sec and at 30% Max. Power Calculated Reported

NMHC Pass Ratio: 1.00 1.00 CO Pass Rat io: 1.00 1.00 NOx Pass Ratio: 0.98 1.00 NOx & NMHC Pass Rat io: N/A NIA PM pass rat io: 1.00 1.00 # of NTE Events: 152 38

Emissions Summary - No EGR/Cold Temp Operation Total Emissions (g)

Total Work Gallon of NTEE Min. Time= 30 sec and at 30% Max. Power (hp-hr) Diesel Fuel

( ) ( ) Total Th roughout Test: 47,471 100.0% 340.33 5.90 626.85 873,916.64 2.45 1,727.03 85.85

Percent of Total Emissions, Work and Diesel Fuel Percent of: Time (sec) Time(%) NOx NMHC co CO2 PM Work Total outside of "Basic" NTE Control Area: 30,080 63.4% 27.3% 64.9% 36.2% 20.6% 63.8% 15.3% 17.65 Total in "Basic" NTE Control Area (w/o exclusions): 17,391 36.6% 72.7% 35.1% 63.8% 79.4% 36.2% 84.7% 68.20

Exclusion 6 (Deficiency): 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Exclusion 7 (EMD/OBD): 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Exclusion 8 (EGR/Cold Temp Operation): 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Exclusion 9 (Aftertreatment/Low Temp Operation): 2,522 5.3% 24.6% 16.8% 8.3% 9.6% 1.7% 10.2% 8.22 Exclusion 10 (Altitude/Amb Temp): 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Exclusion 11 (Zero Check): 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total in NTE Control Area (w/o exclusions applied): 14,869 31.3% 48.1% 18.3% 55.5% 69.9% 34.5% 74.5% 59.98 Total in NTE Control Area with L TR flag: 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total in "Basic" NTE w/o excl with Regen flag: 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total of Valid NTE Events in NTE Control Area: 8,825 18.6% 31 .5% 8.7% 33.5% 45.8% 23.9% 48.8% 39.28

Data Processing and Statistical Analyses (2016 Test Order)

Valid NTE Events and Vehicle-Pass Ratio - Engine Family Name: EMFR1-HDEFN3, Vocational Truck Effect of EGR Cold Temperature (Exclusion) on Valid NTE Events (Turning “off” the EGR Cold Temperature Exclusion): EGR cold temperature operation is defined as

engine meeting either of the following:

• Intake Manifold Temp IMT (OF) ≤ IMT defined in IMP (bars) = 0.0875 x IMT - 7.75, or

• Engine Coolant Temp ECT (OF) ≤ ECT defined in IMP (bars) = 0.0778 x ECT – 9.8889

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 8 8

Page 9: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

Vehicle Test Information and Average Emission Results

Test Date = June 6, 2017 Average Valid NTEE NOx = 0.09 g/bhp-hr

Vocaltional Truck Engine Family Name = EMFR1-HDEFN3 Average NOx = 0.19 g/bhp-hr

Test Identification Code= 191 Average NOx (non-idle)= 0.17 g/bhp-hr

Start Odometer= 361511 mi Average NOx outside NTE = 0.20 g/bhp-hr

End Odometer= 362102 mi Average Cold NOx = 1.79 g/bhp-hr

Covered Mileage = 591 mi Average Idle NOx = 19.5 g/hr

Shift Day Testing = 13.19 hr Total Mass NOx= 340.33 g

Ambient Temp Range = 53.8 to 82.4 °F Total Work = 1727 hp-hr

Average Ambient Temp= 65.93 °F Gallon of Diesel Fuel= 85.85 gallons

MFR Reported Standard/FEL, Multiplier, NO NMHC CO NO NMHC PM X x+ Accuracy Margin, and NTE Threshold

Standard/FEL

Multiplier

In use Margin

Accu racy Margin

Threshold(g/bhp-hr)

0.31

1.5

N/A

0.15

0.62

0.14 15.5 N/A 0.01

1.5 1.25 N/A 1.5

N/A N/A N/A N/A

0.01 0.15 N/A 0.01

0.22 19.5 N/A 0.03

Data Processing and Statistical Analyses (2016 Test Order)

Vehicle In-Use Test Information - Engine Family Name: EMFR1-HDEFN3, Vocational Truck

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 9 9

Page 10: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

Summary Staistics I Calculated Values

Average Pass Ratio (NOx) 0.98

'Max Pass Ratio (NOx) 1

Min Pass Ratio (NOx) 0.84

Number of Vehiicles Faiiled iin 2016 Test order 2

Average NOx of Valid NTE Events (g/bhp-hr) 0. 10

Average NOx (g/bhp-hr) 0.44

Average NOx Outside NTE Control Zone (q/bhp-hr) 0.66

Average Cold NOx (g/bhp-hr) 2.52

Average NOx (g/mile) 1.04

Total Mass NOx per Test Day (g) 10024

Average Test Duration (hr) 8

Average Covered Mileage (mile) 303

Total Mileage (mile) 13328

Percent Time and Work Outsiide NTE Zone 67% and 24%

Percent Time and Work iin NTE Zone w/o Exclusions 33% and 76%

Percent Time and Work iin NTE Zone w/ Exclusions 17% and 39%

Percent Time and Work of Valid NTE Events in NTE Zone 7% and 16%~

Data Processing and Statistical Analyses (2016 Test Order)

In-Use Testing Data Statistics – Average Values Calculated from Tested Vehicles

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 10 10

Page 11: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

MFR Name

Manufacturer 1 MY2013

Manufacturer 1 MY2014

Manufacturer 1 MY2014

Manufacturer 2 MY2014

Manufacturer 3 MY2014

Manufacturer 4 MY2014

Manufacturer 5 MY2014

Manufacturer 6 MY2015

Manufacturer 7 MY2015

MFR Engine Family

DMFR1-MDEFN1

EMFR 1-HDEFN2

EMFR 1-HDEFN3

EMFR2-HDEFN1

EMFR3-MDEFN1

EMFR4-LDEFN1

EMFR5-HDEFN1

FMFR6-MDEFN1

FMFR7-HDEFN1

Production Volume for

Corresponding

45973

3178

42329

32279

2911

12071

34196

7744

4081

Average Estimated

Mass NOx NOx per Shift Production

Day per Shift Day

(Metric ton)

120.52 5.54

232 .54 0.74

450.61 19.07

132.23 4.27

104.06 0.30

109.23 1.32

368.17 12.59

110.03 0.85

322 .82 1.32

Standard/ Average FEL NOx NOx

(g/bhp-hr) (g/bhp-hr

0.20 0.67

0.20 0.28

0.31 0.38

0.20 0.25

0.20 0.31

0.20 0.56

0.20 0.38

0.50 0.53

0.20 0.61

Average NOxof Valid NTEE

(g/bhp-hr)

0.13

0.12

0.07

0.04

0.08

0.2

0.12

0.08

0.02

Average

NOx Outside

NTE Zone

(g/bhp-hr)

0.88

0.59

0.41

0.29

0.57

0.48

0.54

0.63

1.55

Average Average NOx (Non• NOx Average

Idle) (Idle) Cold NOx

(g/bhp-hr) --0.59 7.07 1.82

0.1 43.73 3.87

0.34 16.67 1.69

0.12 23 2.81

0.26 38.81 1.47

0.34 37.34 2.02

0.3 73.61 4.05

0.34 19.31 1.72

0.13 30.13 3.25

Distance Specific

NOx

2.28

0.85

1.02

0.57

0.5

0.52

1.17

0.67

1.78

Data Processing and Statistical Analyses (2016 Test Order)

Overall NTE NOx Emission and Average Mass NOX Per Shift Day Calculated from Tested Vehicles

Average NOX emissions from valid NTE sampling events are lower than the Standard/FEL NOX

Average cold NOX is always higher than the NTE NOX

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 11 11

Page 12: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

NO

.x E

m1is

sion

(g/h

p-hr

), 10

~ p

p ...

..\.

.....\

. f'.

) m

I ;g

0

U1

0 01

0

0 0

0 0

0

0 I

I l>

mc:

cc

::J

:::,

CD<;

:;:

0. 1

to 5

I

:::, :;·C

D I o

o a.

'<

::J

en

3s

r CD

,...

5 to

10

I I

~:g - '1J

I I

I a

10 to

15

.... CD 0 ~

0 -

-::J

15 to

20

20

to2

5

I ~

480

• I 25

' '=

r -

to 3

0 ►

-· ~

<

!l

549

(0

'P

C'D

30

to.35

m

o:

:i UJ

X

i

'C

;;,-

7-"

C'D

58

~

cp C'D

3

51

04

0

~

Ir§

C.

cp

""'I

= Q

, I»

(1

) :::

!'I ::::

s 4

0to

4

;::i.

(i

(Q

-,

z ('I

) C'D

s

~

0 -

3 X

~

4S

to so

1

z (T

l .,,

-I

:, .....

:::c

m

---j

-(/

) ('D

50

10

55

.....

~

c..

TI

II ('I

) ...,

1~

523

0:, .....

5S

t ~ m

~

...,

-0

ao

>< (t

i

0 52

2 Bo

_

_ ,.

"-l

. to

65

I ~

6S

to lo

L .~

7

0to

75

-55

5

0 _

:i,,

N

<.

,,)

~

01

O

') -..

J 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0

Exh

au

st A

T T

em

pe

ratu

re 0

1F

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Heavy-Duty In-Use Testing Details

Urban Brake-Specific NOx Emissions are About 3-5 X NTE Standard – Engine Family Name: EMFR1-HDEFN3, Vocational Truck

12 12

Page 13: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

t. 4 ■ Av . IBr.ake-S ecific NOx

11. 2 -.... .c I

11 C. .c -en -C: 0.8 0 U) U) ·- 0. 16 E w >< 0 0.4 z NOx INTIE Std = 1.5X0.2 = 0.30

0.2

0 tr.),

,s, 0

,o fiJ Q ~ fi? & 12 0 & ·O ...... ('II) ·CO· C .B .s -8 o, .s .s o, .s -8

,,_ ~ ~ s to C C · C C 0 & 12 C

,:,,... r-v· ·(\'), 'V' to co C 0)

Percent of Max. Power

Heavy-Duty In-Use Testing Details

Average Brake-Specific NOx Emissions Increase at Lower Power Especially below 30% of Max Power -Engine Family Name: EMFR1-HDEFN3, Vocational Truck

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 13 13

Page 14: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

100%

C: 80% 0 -m a.;;. IU 60% a. 0 -0 ... 40% C: ¢1 u i,,;_

¢1 .20% D..

0%

~

.,.,~ 14...0 () .

Urban

■ % of Time

□ % MassNOx

■ % of COQ

□ % Woirk

Rural

i-------f<;J";:,,_.j;;<;J°~ --1

Highway

Vehiole Speed Rang,e 1(MPH),

0.50 0.45,

0.40

en 0.35, C: 0 0.30 -u 0..25-m a.;;.

LL IU

0..20 E 0.15, F

0.10 0.05,

0.00

.s C -

■ Timi,e Fractions

C C & & .0 C ,o 0), "<;/"

0

" co Oj, 0

.s 0 0 0 0 O· .s· -- ..... ..... C ·

..... . ..... C · C & C R 0 .9

'i\/ ·i>) ~ CO· Cl:), & Peroe-nt of Max. Power

Heavy-Duty In-Use Testing Details

Percent of Time Spent in Urban Driving and Idling - Engine Family Name: EMFR1-HDEFN3, Vocational Truck

Urban + rural driving represent over 40% of the HD NOx emissions time from vehicles

In real driving low speed and idling are major part of the duty cycles even for line haul and delivery vehicles

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 14 14

Page 15: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

100%

90%

80%

70% -'#. -Qj 60% E

i= .. C: Qj 50% u ... Qj 0.

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

~ r<l 00

~ Ol <.O

~ Ol 00

~ .,., ,..._

~ 0 .,.,

■ Percent Time of Valid NTE Events

■ Percent Time Ouside NTE Zone ~

~ 0 ,..._

Vehicles Tested

~ ,..._ .,.,

,..._ 00

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Heavy-Duty In-Use Testing Details

Percent Time of In-Use Testing in Valid NTE Events vs. Outside Valid NTE Events

15 15

Page 16: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

0. ~,.

('--?

◊-~ ✓'

A. ,('-

-? 67

0. ◊-~✓'

A_~~­

,('--?

70.

-~

◊-~✓'

A_~~­

,('--?

670.

-~

◊-~✓'

A_~~­

,('--?

670.

-~

~~✓~

~,.('-

1, ,('-

-? ~(

C::

'./

~~ ✓~

;c-1,

,('--?

~(C:

: '.

/ ~~✓~~

,('--?

~(C:

: ~

~~✓~~

~

~(C

::~

~~✓~~

~

~(C

::~

~~✓~~

~

~(C

::~

~~✓~~

~ ~ ~

~~✓--

s-:~~

~)f)✓,L

~~

~-'

<, ~

~~ ✓~~~

,('--? ~ ~

~~ ✓~~~

,('--?

~(C:

: ~

~~✓~~

~

~(C

::~

~~~~~

,('--?

~(C:

: ~

~~~~~

~

~(C::'✓

~~~~~

(';,('-

-?~

~~~'

./ <

~,.(

'-~--s-◊

. :i-✓

II)

~-

''?.

~~

J ·7,1

('--?.

--s-◊.

1,✓

;:;·

~~ ;

;,,'A

_~~

iD"

,('--?.

670.

'./

en

~~

;;,,

'A_

~~

~

,('--?.

670.

'./

II)

~~ ;

;,,'A

_~~-

cn

.<"-?.

70.

-~

iir ~~ ;;,

,'A_~

~-c

. ,('--

?. 70

. -~

~-

;;,,'A

_ ~,.

('-1,

7,1('-

70.

'./

~-)

f)V

. ~~

­·7,

1('-

~<>

-~

~ -)

f)v.

«'~

. 7

~ ~

<> -

~

~~ ~~

«'~

,('-1

1 ~(

C::

'./

~~~~~

,('-11

~(C:

: '.

/ ~~~~~

,('-11

~(C:

: '.

/ ~~~"Y.~

~

~(C::'✓

~~~"Y.~

~

~(C::'✓

~-~

'L

~

71!

''<,

'./

~-6

''A

_ ~~

71!

67¢

'./

~-

6''A

_ ~1

, 71

! 67

¢ './

~

-6'

'A_

~1

, ~

'.

/ ~

-6'

'A_

~1

, ·7

1! ·

7<>

'./

~6

'~~

1,

,.('

-_~

>~

~'.

/ ~,.

('-~ --

S-c ;i

,✓ ~--'

:> «',.(

'-_ 7,1

('-~ --

S-c ~

~--':> «

',.('-_

·~~ --

S-c ~

~--':> ~

. 7,

1('--?

,s,<> ~

::>--s

,,«-~

~~ -

✓ ~

-✓

0 ~

I-'

0 ~

34

%

Pe

rce

nt W

ork

(%)

111

0 ~ 50

%

C7I

0 ~

55

%

62%

-.J

0 ~

00

0 ~ 8

0%

I.I)

0 ~

■ ■

"C

"C

ti)

ti)

;:; ;:;

ti)

ti)

~ ~

~ ~

0 0

... ...

~ ~

0 O

C

: -

Ill

<

Qj

c..

-ti

) -·

c..

z z

-t

-t

m

m

N

m

0 <

:I

ti

) ti

) :I

.... Ill

I-'

0 ~

o~

m ;g l>

mc:

cc

::J

:::,

CD

<;:

;:

::I :;

·Cl)

C')

0 Q

. '<

::Je

n

3sr

CD ,

...

::I C

D [I

ll '1J

a .... II)

C') ~

0 :::,

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Heavy-Duty In-Use Testing Details

Percent Work of In-Use Testing in Valid NTE Events vs. Outside Valid NTE Events

16 16

Page 17: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

.... r-: ■ NOx of Valid NTE Events <:I"

5.00 - .... □ Overall NOx

■ Cold NOx

4.00 --'-.c I

C. .c .c ....... tlO 3.00 - -Ill C: 0

NOx NTE Std

Ill =1.5 X 0.20 = 0.30 Ill

E 2.00 w -X 0 z -

-1.00 -

-

0.00 I' f I ..... ,..,. ' . -J ,;.· ~ -·· w - ·-if 0: I u lf -- ( -- r [ J l -,- ' J J l - · ' i [ I7 ~ i i ■ i - -

Heavy-Duty In-Use Testing Details

Average NOx Emissions of Valid NTE Events vs. Overall NOx and Cold NOx Emissions

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 17 17

Page 18: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

4.50

4.00

-lo.. .s=.

3.50 I

a. .s=. .c ......... 3.00 tl.O -lo..

Q) lo.. 2.50 ::J

+,I u ~ ::J i:::

2.00

ro ~ lo.. 1.50 Q)

0.. i::: 0 1.00 Ill Ill

E 0.50 w X 0 z 0.00

~ ~ ~ !:5 !:5 !:5

$ f f ;, ;, ;, I I I

~ !:5 ~

tv ~ ~

■ NOx of Valid NTE Events

□ Overa ll NOx

■ Co ld NOx

■ NOx Outside NTE Zone

~ ~ !:5 !:5

f Q ";"

~ ~ ~ I ~

~ !:5 ~ ~ ~ ~

Lil 0 <:t

~ !:5

f <o ~ ~

~ !:5 ~ " ~ ~

Manufacturer 1 Manufacturer 1 Manufacturer 1 Manufacturer 2 Manufacturer 3 Manufacturer 4 Manufacturer 5 Manufacturer 6 Manufacturer 7 Mnou Mnou Mnou Mnou Mnou Mnou Mnou Mno~ Mno~

Vehicles Tested

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Heavy-Duty In-Use Testing Details

Average Brake-Specific NOx Emissions per Engine Family

18 18

Page 19: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

2.50 --------------------------------------------------~

-Q)

E .........

t:1.0 -' --.c I

a. .c .c .........

t:1.0 -

-Q) 0.. X 0 z

2.00

1.50

1.00

0.50

0.00

2.28 ■ Brake-Specific NOx (g/bhp-hr)

■ Distance-Specific NOx (g/mile)

~ ~ ;, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

.f ~ ~ ~ .f .$ ~ .f ~ ~ ~ ~ r-v ~

t:/, ~ (() ('\

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Manufacturer 1 Manufacturer 1 Manufacturer 1 Manufacturer 2 Manufacturer 3 Manufacturer 4 Manufacturer 5 Manufacturer 6 Manufacturer 7 MY2013 MY2014 MY2014 MY2014 MY2014 MY2014 MY2014 MY2015 MY2015

Vehicles Tested

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Heavy-Duty In-Use Testing Details

Average Brake-Specific vs. Distance Specific NOx Emissions per Engine Family

19 19

Page 20: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States .-,., Environmental Protection ,, Agency

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Data Summary

Summary of Data Submitted for 2012 – 2016 Test Orders

Overall average vehicle pass ratios submitted since 2012. NOx = 0.97 PM = 0.99 CO= 1.0

Percentage of tests meeting or exceeding the 0.90 vehicle-pass ratio threshold since 2012. NOx = 94% PM = 100% CO = 100%

Estimated total mileage covered is greater than 200,000 miles.

Manufacturer-Run In-Use Testing Program Data for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines from 2009 – 2015 are posted on the EPA website. The data are organized by test order year and have been redacted for Confidential Business Information (CBI). Use the link below to visit the website.

https://www.epa.gov/compliance-and-fuel-economy-data/manufacturer-run-use-testing-program-data-heavy-duty-diesel-3

20 20

Page 21: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States .-,., Environmental Protection ,, Agency

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Conclusions and Recommendations

Manufacturers in-use testing is important to ensure on-highway heavy duty diesel engines are in compliance with NTE standards and test procedures.

Engine selection for in-use testing program forced several manufacturers to initiate voluntary recalls due to defects in the after-treatment system and emission control devices.

In-use emissions testing can positively influencing air quality by ensuring that manufacturers implement emissions control technologies to achieve emissions reduction under real driving conditions including low speeds and loads.

Recognizing the difference between type-approval engine emissions and in-use emissions results, adding low load data would more realistically reflect real world operation.

In addition, data may more realistically reflect real world emissions if NTE Zone(s) boundaries are modified to include: Lower percentage of max. power (e.g., 20%, 10%, etc…), and Cold intake manifold (i.e., removal of exclusion 8). Introduce new NTE multipliers.

Cold-start and idle NOx emissions, almost without exception exceed the NTE emission limits.

21 21

Page 22: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States .-,., Environmental Protection ,, Agency

APPENDIX

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 22 22

Page 23: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

EMA Proposal for In Use Testing Nationwide not Just California (JB 10/26/2018)

Standards are in g/bhp-hr Composite-FTP

2024

0.15

2027 +

Approximate 50% reduction in real-world in-use NOx

steady state RMC 0.15 New Paradigm potentially t----------+---------------------------~utilizing NOx sensors In-Use Program NTE Standard: 0.22 (0.15 g/bhp-h r x 1.5)?

(depending on sensor Increased coverage of in-use operations via expanded NTE parameters: >----------------------------------<development and durability)

and telematics to assess f------------,____,-------------------------<aggregate in-use engine family

Current Expanded

Min event duration 30 sec

Max event duration

Min Torque

1 0 min or 1 Ox shortest event (600 seconds max)

30%

Min Power 30%

Min aftertreatment 250 QC temp

IMT exclusion (8) Reduce by 20 QC

15 sec

Unl imited

20% of Max Torque

20% of Max Power

230 QC

Continue data gathering to support New Paradigm in 2027

08D Limit 0.40

Useful Life Same as cu rrent program

Certification Fuel Non-bio fuel only

performance

New Paradigm

(LHD, MHD, HHD) TBD

Non-bio fuel only

2024 EMA Proposed NTE In-Use Testing

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 23 23

Page 24: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

2000 • Average Torque

(over 50 sec)

- Torque Curve

1400 --t-----t------Hf--- --li---=----,..._.'V-"'-c---,hl..i---~ ~ ,,__---1--__ ---1------< - RPM Lower Bound

~ 1200 -t----'- -+--4---111--_;'.Z---,,~~~ ~---~ -j-f---"t--~ ...:::--+-1

i:. -; 1000 :::I C"

15% ESC Speed

- Torque Lower Bound at 30% Max Torque

~ 800 --t----+------"'k;~-..►.~a..'f!e----lLll---_j_-----l----41---_____j - Torque Lower Bound at 30% Max Power

600

0 +------.- t--~ ---+~ ~ 4'---~ ....... ~ ~ ~----l-~----l---~----1--1____.j

500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100

Engine Speed (rpm)

:0 1200 -t----+---4---1!--;,"~~~:......Jlf--

~ !!j 1000 +---- ---l----------~i..--1-~~L..:!._

e­~ 800 --j-~ ~ ---t----t--=-------'"ljo;cfl~ .. ~----a'---11----_j_-----l----lil-___j

200

500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100

Engine Speed (rpm)

• Average Torque (over 50 sec)

- Torque Curve

- RPM Lower Bound 15% ESC Speed

- Torque Lower Bound at 20% Max Torque

- Torque Lower Bound at 20% Max Power

2024 EMA Proposed NTE In-Use Testing

NTE Control Area - Engine Family Name: EMFR1-HDEFN3, Vocational Truck

Current NTE Control Area

Valid NTE event duration is between 30 – 600 seconds of vehicle continuous operation in the NTE zone with all exclusions set in the current regulation are applied

EMA Expanded NTE Control Area

Valid NTE event duration is between 15 to unlimited seconds of vehicle continuous operation in the NTE zone

• EMA is proposing a 0.15 g/bhp-hr national standard

• NTE standard 0.15x1.5= 0.23 g/bhp-hr

• IMT exclusion is reduced by 20 oC (68 oF)

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 24 24

Page 25: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

Pass Ratios M MFR/XML

for NTEE Min. Time= 15 sec, at aero

Calculated Reported 20% Max. Power

NMHC Pass Ratio: 1.00 1.00

CO Pass Ratio: 1.00 1.00 NOx Pass Ratio: 0.93 1.00 NOx & NMHC Pass Ratio: N/A N/A PM pass ratio: 1.00 1.00

# of NTE Events: 379 38

Emissions Summary Time (sec)

Total Throughout Test 47,471

Percent of Time (sec)

Total outside of NTE Control Area 26,120 Total in NTE Control Area (w/o exclusions) 21,351

Exclusion 6 (Deficiency) 0 Exclusion 7 (EMD/O8D) 0 Exclusion 8 (EGR/Cold Temp Operation) 0 Exclusion 9 (Aftertreatment/Low Temp Operation) 1,626 Exclusion 10 (Altitude/Amb Temp) 0 Exclusion 11 (Zero Check) 0

Total in NTE Control Area (w/ all exclusions applied) 19,725 Total in NTE Control Area with L TR flag 0 Total in "Basic" NTE w/o excl with Regen flag 0

Total of Valid NTE Events in NTE Control Area 16,825

MFR Reported

Standard/FEL, Multiplier, NOx NMHC CO NOx+NMHC PM Accuracy Margin, and NTE Threshold

Standard 0.15 0.14 15.5 N/A 0.01 Multiplier 1.5 1.5 1.25 N/A 1.5

In use Margin N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.15 0.01 0.15 N/A 0.01 0.38 0.22 19.5 N/A 0.03

Total Work Total Emissions (g) (hp-hr)

Time(%) NOx NMHC co CO2 PM Work

100.0% 340.33 5.90 626.85 873,916.64 2.45 1,727.03 Percent of Total Emissions and Work

Time(%) NOx NMHC co CO2 PM Work

55.0% 21.5% 58.4% 27.0% 13.0% 52.5% 7.8% 45.0% 78.5% 41.6% 73.0% 87.0% 47.5% 92.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

3.4% 19.6% 18.8% 5.3% 5.4% 8.9% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

41.6% 58.9% 22.8% 67.7% 81.6% 38.6% 86.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.4% 54.7% 18.8% 57.8% 73.8% 35.3% 78.2%

11

2024 EMA Proposed NTE In-Use Testing

Valid NTE Events and Vehicle-Pass Ratio - Engine Family Name: EMFR1-HDEFN3, Vocational Truck

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 25 25

Page 26: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

Complete List of Exclusions

Exclusions as Set in the Current Regulations

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 26 26

Page 27: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total Shit Day Testing Total in NTE

Total in NTE Total of Valid

Vehicle Number of Total Outside of Exclusion 9: After Time= 47,471 sec (13.20 hr.), and Control Area Exclusion 8: NTE Events in

treatment Low Control Area with Pass-Ratio Valid NTE NTE Control without EGR/Cold Temp NTE Control Mass NOx = 340.33 (g)

Area Temp all Exclusions) (NOx) Events Exclusions Area

Time (sec) 30,080 17,391 11 ,563 2,522 5,270 2,431 1

NTEE Min. Time = 30 sec Time (%) 63.4% 36.6% 24.4% 5.3% 11 .1% 5.1% 1.00 37

with Exclusions 8 and 9 at 30% Max. Power NOx (%) 27.3% 72.7% 50.9% 24.6% 13.4% 7.3%

Time (sec) 30,080 17,391 0 0 17,391 9,854 2

NTEE Min. Time = 30 sec Time (%) 63.4% 36.6% 0.0% 0.0% 36.6% 20.8% 0.97 171

without Exclusions 8 and 9 at 30% Max. Power NOx (%) 27.3% 72.7% 0.0% 0.0% 72.7% 40.8%

Time (sec) 26,120 21,351 14,375 3,689 6,142 2,957 3

NTEE Min. Time = 30 sec Time (%) 55.0% 45.0% 30.3% 7.8% 12.9% 6.2% 1.00 47

with Exclusions 8 and 9 at 20% Max. Power NOx (%) 21.5% 78.5% 54.7% 28.2% 13.7% 8.4%

Time (sec) 26,120 21,351 0 0 21,351 13,698 4

NTEE Min. Time = 30 sec Time (%) 55.0% 45.0% 0.0% 0.0% 45.0% 28.9% 0.96 215

without Exclusions 8 and 9 at 20% Max. Power NOx (%) 21.5% 21.5% 0.0% 0.0% 78.5% 50.9%

Time (sec) 23,050 24,421 16,443 4,634 6,913 3,859 5

NTEE Min. Time = 30 sec Time (%) 48.6% 51.4% 34.6% 9.8% 14.6% 8.1% 1.00 64

with Exclusions 8 and 9 at 10% Max. Power NOx (%) 18.2% 81.8% 56.2% 30.5% 14.0% 9.1%

Time (sec) 23,050 24,421 0 0 24,421 18,838 6

NTEE Min. Time = 30 sec Time (%) 48.6% 51.4% 0.0% 0.0% 51.4% 39.7% 0.96 266

without Exclusions 8 and 9 at 10% Max. Power NOx (%) 18.2% 81.8% 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 60.4%

Time (sec) 30,080 17,391 11 ,563 2,522 5,270 5,270 7

NTEE Min. Time = 1 sec Time (%) 63.4% 36.6% 24.4% 5.3% 11 .1% 11 .1% 0.99 809

with Exclusions 8 and 9 at 30% Max. Power NOx (%) 27.3% 72.7% 50.9% 24.6% 13.4% 13.4%

Time (sec) 30,080 17,391 0 0 17,391 17,391 8

NTEE Min. Time = 1 sec Time (%) 63.4% 36.6% 0.0% 0.0% 36.6% 36.6% 0.95 2332

without Exclusions 8 and 9 at 30% Max. Power NOx (%) 27.3% 72.7% 0.0% 0.0% 72.7% 72.7%

Time (sec) 23,050 24,421 16,443 4,634 6,913 6,913 9

NTEE Min. Time = 1 sec Time (%) 48.6% 51.4% 34.6% 9.8% 14.6% 14.6% 0.99 939

with Exclusions 8 and 9 at 10% Max. Power NOx (%) 18.2% 81.8% 56.2% 30.5% 14.0% 14.0%

Time (sec) 23,050 24,421 0 0 24,421 24,421 10

NTEE Min. Time = 1 sec Time (%) 48.6% 51.4% 0.0% 0.0% 51.4% 51.4% 0.94 2869

without Exclusions 8 and 9 at 10% Max. Power NOx (%) 18.2% 81.8% 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 81.8%

Effects of Exclusions on NTE In-Use Testing

Effects of Exclusions 8, 9, Valid NTE Event Duration and % of Max. Power on In-use Testing

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019 27 27

Page 28: A Comprehensive Study of Manufacturers In-Use Testing Data ... · EPA.United States 111..SJ Environmental Protection ,, Agency . 2000 1800 1600 1400 ~ 1200 -,t: ! Gl . Jl!:000 :,

~ EPA.United States .-,., Environmental Protection ,, Agency

FHamady, ADuncan; M 10 -13, 2019

Executive Summary

In-use emissions data were collected from 44 heavy-duty (HD) on-highway vehicles that were operated on their representative routes in different states consistent with Not-To-Exceed (NTE) test procedures. These vehicles were selected by EPA and CARB for 2016 Test Order manufacturer run in-use testing program for HD diesel engines from model years 2013- 2015. The selected vehicle classes are light, medium and heavy-duty, with trailers, no trailers, plain closed box, dump trailers, tank and others. All vehicles had engines that were certified to either 0.20, 0.25, 0.31, or 0.50 g/hp-hr NOx standard/family emission limits, and to 0.01 g/hp-hr PM. The NTE limits for these vehicles ranged from 0.45 to 0.90 g/hp-hr.

Our computational and statistical analyses of the in-use data showed that the percent time and work outside the NTE zone are 67% and 24%; in the NTE zone with all exclusions set in the current regulation are 17% and 39%; and without exclusions are 33% and 76% respectively. Consequently, the percent time and work of the valid NTE sampling events are only 7% and 16%. Analyses also revealed that the urban and rural driving represent over 40% of NOx emissions time and the average brake-specific NOx emissions are about 3-4 times the NTE standards. In addition, the brake-specific NOx emissions were significantly higher below 30% of max. power set in the current regulations.

Calculated results showed that the overall average brake-specific NOx from the 44 vehicles ranged from 0.25 to 0.67 g/hp-hr, for NOx outside the NTE zone from 0.29 to 1.55 g/hp-hr, for cold NOx from 1.47 to 4.05 g/hp-hr, and for distance-specific NOx ranged from 0.5 to 2.28 g/mile. For all vehicles, the average NOx emissions from the valid NTE sampling events were lower than the certification values, and the corresponding average vehicle-pass ratio was 98%. Results also indicated that low speed and idling are major part of the duty cycles even for line haul and delivery vehicles.

Finally, without the EGR cold temperature and (NOX and NMHC) aftertreatment warmup exclusions, the percent time in the NTE zone had remarkably improved, and the vehicle-pass ratio was slightly reduced. Also, changing the valid NTE event duration from 30 to 1 sec, had improved significantly the number of NTE events. In contrast, lowering the percent of maximum power from 30% to 10% had slightly reduced the vehicles-pass ratio. In this study, with all exclusion applied only two vehicles failed the in-use testing and several reported no valid NTE events. However, without applying the EGR cold temperature and (NOX and NMHC) aftertreatment warmup exclusions more than 10% of the vehicles failed the in-use testing.

28 28