Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A Burning DesireSteps Toward an EvolutionaryPsychology of Fire Learning
Daniel M T Fessler
ABSTRACT
Although fire is inherently dangerous leading many animals to avoid it for most ofhuman history mastery of fire has been critical to survival Humans can therefore beexpected to possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to controlling fireBecause techniques for starting maintaining and using fire differ across ecosystems thepostulated adaptations can be expected to take the form of domain-specific learningmechanisms rather than fixed behavioral templates After outlining features that suchmechanisms are predicted to possess I review the literature on fire play in western chil-dren finding that attraction to and interest in fire is widespread experimentation withfire often begins in early childhood and fire play typically peaks in late childhood orearly adolescence The latter aspect stands in contrast to results from a survey of ethno-graphers which reveals that in societies in which fire is routinely used as a tool chil-dren typically master control of fire by middle childhood at which point interest in fireis already declining This suggests that fire learning is retarded in western childrenarguably due to patterns of fire use in modern societies that are atypical when viewedfrom a broader cross-cultural perspective Together with the fact that western enter-tainment media provide a distorted portrait of the properties of fire this pattern whilelimiting the value of naturalistic observations of fire learning in the West neverthelesshas the benefit of providing a strong testing ground for future experiments exploring theuniversality of the psychology underlying the control of fire
KEYWORDSFire children learning fire play
Center for Behavior Evolution amp Culture and Department of Anthropology 341Haines Hall UCLA Los Angeles CA 90095-1553 USA Tel +1 (310) 794-9252 Fax+1 (310) 206-7833 Email dfessleranthrouclaedu
Acknowledgements I am grateful to the many investigators listed beneath Table 1who contributed ethnographic observations for this paper
copy Koninklijke Brill NV Leiden 2006 Journal of Cognition and Culture 63-4
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 429
430 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Introduction
The use of fire is a human universal a behavior present in virtually allsocieties (Brown 1991) Indeed while there is debate as to the earliestevidence for the controlled use of fire evolutionary anthropologists tracethe manipulation of fire far beyond the origins of our species ndash withsuggestive findings dated as early as 790000 years ago (Goren-Inbar et al 2004) and some even surpassing the one million year mark (Brainamp Sillen 1988) it is clear that the history of hominidsrsquo exploitation offire is quite deep The utility of fire for our hunter-gatherer ancestorsand their predecessor species was likely multiplex In addition to firersquosobvious benefits as a source of warmth and light fire played a key rolein the evolution of the human diet as cooking would have allowed ourspecies to exploit a vastly expanded array of plant and animal foods(Ragir 2000 Stanford 1999 Wrangham Jones Laden Pilbeam ampConklin-Brittain 1999) Likewise the control of fire allowed for appli-cations in hunting combating predators and hostile conspecifics man-aging wild plant resources and tool production (cf Clark amp Harris1985) Of course at no point in our speciesrsquo history will fire have con-stituted an unadulterated good ndash together with the smoke that it pro-duces fire is a significant source of injury and death a pattern reflectedin most animalsrsquo wariness of fire
With a deep evolutionary history and a profound impact on fitnessthere is every reason to believe that fire has been a source of recurrentand substantial selective pressures shaping human behavior and the psy-chological architecture that underlies it However despite the uncontrover-sial perhaps incontrovertible nature of this conclusion to date evolutionarypsychologists have largely ignored firersquos role in human evolution Thepurpose of this paper is to call attention to this lacuna and suggest somepossible solutions
The human use of fire can be broken down into two elementarycomponents namely controlling fire and producing fire Fire occurs nat-urally due to lightning strikes volcanic activity and concentrated solarradiation In contrast the artificial production of fire requires highly spe-cialized tools techniques and materials While this suggests that earlyhominids acquired the ability to control fire long before they were ableto produce it importantly all available evidence indicates that like the
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 430
A BURNING DESIRE 431
production of fire the control of fire is a learned behavior that is pro-foundly contingent on experience This observation merits further con-sideration By way of contrast consider the manufacture of the spiderrsquosweb or the salmonrsquos nest While each involves relatively complex con-structive behavior that employs variable features of the environment inlight of the life cycles of these organisms these activities are necessarilygoverned by innate templates rather than acquired information Givena) the chronological depth of the hominid relationship with fire b) thebenefits of controlling fire and c) the costs of erring in this enterprisethis raises the question as to why natural selection did not similarly favorthe evolution of largely innate fire-management skills in humans Onepossible explanation is that unlike spiders or salmon humans and theirpredecessors occupied a wide range of ecosystems
Many of the environments occupied by humans are characterizedby enormous variety in the features relevant to controlling fire princi-pal among which is the nature of available fuels Combustibles vary withregard to a number of properties relevant to controlling fire includingease of ignition rapidity of combustion and explosiveness Accordinglyhad natural selection favored the evolution of a template or schema akinto those that appear to govern some animal constructions (ie the pat-terned use of materials having differing specified properties in a set ofdiscrete tasks characterized by a fixed temporal sequence) such a tem-plate would have been of limited utility as it would necessarily havebeen parochial to a given ecosystem due to its reliance on fixed typesrather than attributes This is because unlike for example the twigsand feathers used to construct a birdrsquos nest many of the properties ofcombustibles are not detectable on the basis of surface features ndash exam-ining downed tree limbs for example will not reveal the features ofcombustion typical of each type of wood to say nothing of inspectingmaterials such as animal fat beeswax or tar Because the techniquesinvolved in building and maintaining a fire are largely dependent on thefuels selected any pre-existing template for such techniques would havehad to specify the fuels to be employed Given that the only way thatnatural selection could have produced a fire-management template wouldthus have been to specify fixed ingredients (akin for example to thebeaverrsquos fondness for willows cottonwood and aspen) and given thatsuch a template would therefore have failed to translate effectively across
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 431
432 DANIEL M T FESSLER
ecosystems the only avenue open to selection processes operating on aspecies as wide-ranging as ourselves was to rely on learning for the acqui-sition of the requisite behaviors
Importantly contrary to portraits common in the conventional socialscience literature a reliance on acquired information in no way indi-cates the absence of domain-specific evolved psychological mechanisms(see Tooby Cosmides amp Barrett 2005) On the contrary beginning withGarcia Ervin and Koellingrsquos (1966) seminal demonstration of special-purpose mechanisms dedicated to the acquisition of toxin-avoidancebehaviors evolutionists have embraced a perspective wherein psycho-logical adaptations can operate via a predisposition to attend to discretecues and particular sources of information in order to learn about specificfacets of the environment Well-documented examples include snakedetection in primates and humans (Mineka Davidson Cook amp Keir1984 Oumlhman 1993) and inbreeding-relevant kin recognition in humans(Wolf 1993)
Expected properties of a mechanism dedicated to fire learning
In exploring the properties that we might expect to characterize theinformation-acquisition mechanisms specific to the problem of control-ling fire it is useful to begin by considering the logical features of thetask domain Parallels between this domain and that of another better-studied information-acquisition task can shed light on these features Forat least two reasons the task domain of learning to control fire is akinto that of learning to cope with threats posed by predatory animalsFirst paralleling the problem of identifying and differentiating amongfuels although some cues are shared by many predators (eg largesharp teeth) these cues are not universal and moreover the color sizemorphology and behavior of predators varies widely across ecosystemsmaking it difficult for natural selection to imbue human minds withinnate predator-recognition templates (Barrett 2005) Second general-ized feedback-based learning is inappropriate to the task of acquiringinformation about predators since particularly for children the costs ofsuch learning would be prohibitively high ndash as Barrett observes ldquoA child
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 432
A BURNING DESIRE 433
that requires attack or injury to learn that an animal is dangerous isunlikely to survive for longrdquo (2005217) Correspondingly if childrenwere to acquire their knowledge of fire exclusively through individualtrial-and-error learning a large percentage would suffer serious or fatalburns
Barrett (2005) outlines five features that can be expected to charac-terize the information acquisition system dedicated to learning aboutpredators we can expect parallels to exist for each of these features inthe domain of controlling fire First learning can be expected to occurwithout extrinsic motivation Just as dangerous animals appear to holdconsiderable fascination for children so too can children be expected tobe spontaneously interested in fire ndash children are predicted to be curi-ous about the flammability of various materials and interested in theconsequences of manipulating or rearranging burning objects addingobjects to or removing objects from a fire and so on Second we canexpect information to be acquired rapidly often on the basis of only asingle exposure To acquire a new animal concept children are expectedto need only a single encounter or to hear only once about the attrib-utes of a dangerous animal Likewise fire learning should be rapid inresponse to minimal exposure ndash information relevant to the control offire is predicted to have high salience such that children will attend tothis information and recall a greater percentage of it following exposurethan will be the case with respect to information relevant to otherdomains that is acquired through general-purpose learning mechanismsThird both because it allows low-cost learning-at-a-distance and becauseit tracks local ecological circumstances socially-transmitted informationconstitutes a valuable resource for both the student of predators and thestudent of fire Just as members of a local group act as a reservoir ofaccumulated observations regarding the identifying attributes and char-acteristic behaviors of indigenous animals so too can othersrsquo knowledgeof the fire-relevant properties of locally-available materials be expectedto play a valuable role in learning to use fire in a given ecosystemFourth the information acquisition system can be expected to employbiases or prior structures that guide learning in the specified domainFor example Barrett suggests that childrenrsquos learning about animals maybe guided by such fundamental categorical distinctions as dangerous ver-sus harmless carnivore versus herbivore and so on Correspondingly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 433
434 DANIEL M T FESSLER
learning about fire may be structured by dichotomies such as flammableversus nonflammable or more broadly things that intensify fires andthings that diminish fires Lastly acquisition of procedural knowledgemay be achieved in part through the operation of dedicated mechanismsthat serve to generate relevant experience in a safe context Just as chaseplay an intrinsically rewarding activity for children may serve to honepredator-prey pursuit and evasion skills (Steen amp Owens 2001) so toomay childrenrsquos manipulations of small fires embers and the like pro-vide a means of acquiring relevant experience in a setting that is saferthan a full-scale cooking or heating fire
Existing literature Childrenrsquos fire play and fire setting inmodern societies
Testing the five sets of predictions described above will require struc-tured experiments involving young children from diverse cultures Becausesuch an enterprise is not entered into lightly it is worth exploring herethe extent to which available findings are congruent with the portrait ofhuman fire psychology outlined above A voluminous literature addressesthe topic of fire setting by children and juveniles Importantly fire set-ting is a broad category of behavior encompassing everything from play-ing with matches to arson The perspective developed here suggests thatfor the child observation of and interaction with fire will often be endsin themselves a motivational orientation that differs markedly from thatwhich pertains when fire is used as a weapon to intentionally inflict dam-age or harm Consistent with this distinction public safety experts dis-tinguish so-called lsquofire playrsquo from other behaviors involving fire definingfire play as ldquoA fire deliberately set for no purpose constructive or destruc-tive beyond the fire itselfrdquo (Hall 20031) This distinction however inno way suggests that fire play is harmless ndash on the contrary fire safetyofficersrsquo concern with fire play is quite justified By way of example inthe US between 1980 and 1999 childrenrsquos fire play resulted in 7306civilian deaths 48922 serious civilian injuries and over 3 billion dol-larsrsquo worth of property damage (Hall 2003) Although governmentalattempts to combat the problem through consumer product safety reg-ulations public information campaigns education plans and interven-
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 434
A BURNING DESIRE 435
tion programs have succeeded in reducing these figures somewhat chil-drenrsquos fire play continues to be a significant source of pain sufferingand expense in modern societies
Much of the literature on fire setting is aimed at characterizing thefeatures of recidivist juvenile fire setters with investigators identifyingattributes and correlates such as cruelty to animals defiance of author-ity and a chaotic or conflictual family environment as risk factors forrecidivism (Kolko 2002) While such research usefully identifies dan-gerous individuals who are relatively resistent to the mechanisms of socialcontrol normally employed to enhance conformity to social standardsthis entreprise generally overshadows the exploration of fire setting amongnon-clinical non-recidivist children Nevertheless despite this bias it ispossible to glean a portrait of such behavior from the existing literature
Kafry (1980) queried 99 lower elementary school boys in BerkeleyCalifornia finding that 45 reported having played with fire and 21reported having caused a fire as a consequence of the latter 18 werecaused by children who were two years of age or younger at the timeof the accident Eighty-one percent of children surveyed reported beinginterested in fire and across ages curiosity was the motive cited mostfrequently to explain the behavior As a comparison group for a clini-cal sample Kolko et al (2001) conducted a three-year longitudinal studyof a community sample of 100 boys and 62 girls age 6-13 (mean =95) with follow-up interviews at one and two years Results reveal quiteconsistent patterns wherein at any one time approximately one-third ofthe children report being interested in fire slightly less than half reportplaying with matches and slightly less than one-third report having setplay fires Viewed individually by the end of the study almost three-quarters of the participants had at some time played with matches orset a play fire Perrin-Wallqvist and Norlander (2003) retrospectively sur-veyed 50 18-year old Swedish men and 45 18-19 year old Swedishwomen Seventy percent of the men reported having played with fireduring childhood and 44 of the women did likewise The principalmotives for childhood fire play were curiosity entertainment and excite-ment seeking a high proportion of subjects reported being fascinated ordrawn to fire Paralleling this result Perrin-Wallqvist et al (Perrin-Wallqvist Archer amp Norlander 2004) surveyed 28 male and 28 female
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 435
436 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Swedish 16-year olds concerning emotional attitudes toward fire While61 thought fire was ldquocozyrdquo and 20 found fire ldquoexcitingrdquo only 9thought that fire was ldquouninterestingrdquo 27 of the respondents found firesufficiently entertaining that they lit fires when bored
Simonsen and Bullis (2001) surveyed 5416 third through eighth gradeOregonian students relatively evenly distributed across ages regardingfire starting interest in fire and motivations for fire play Forty-sevenpercent of students reported having played with fire a retrospective ques-tion revealed that 10 reported starting their first fire between the agesof one and five 27 reported starting their first fire between the agesof six and ten and 10 reported starting their first fire between theages of 11 and 15 Attraction to and interest in fire was quite highalthough only 29 overtly reported being interested in fire 46 reportedliking television programs that involve fire 61 reported enjoying assist-ing adults in lighting or putting out fire 33 reported enjoying burn-ing objects such as twigs grass or paper and 21 reported enjoyingplaying with matches or lighters Correspondingly fire had high enter-tainment value for children with large proportions of respondents cit-ing as motives for fire starting ldquojust for funrdquo (23) and ldquoout of boredomrdquo(19) with curiousity (ldquoto see what would happenrdquo) another significantcontributor (18)
Cotterall (2003) conducted a similar survey of 3031 students fromgrade 3 through 13 in Sudbury Ontario A number of patterns aremarkedly evident First while the frequency of actual fire play shows asteady increase across the age span studied (18 of third graders reporthaving played with matches or lighters in the last year while 81 ofthirteenth graders report having done so) what Cotterall terms lsquoexpressedpreoccupation and fascination with firersquo (eg ldquoAre you curious aboutfirerdquo ldquoAre you really interested in fire and what it can dordquo etc) doesnot vary in any regular fashion across this age range and likewise thelower-level factor that Cotterall terms lsquoexpressed interest in firersquo (egldquoDo you like to start firesrdquo ldquoDo you feel excited when you watch afire burningrdquo ldquoDo you like staring at firerdquo etc) shows only a gradualincrease with age These patterns suggest that the age-related changesin fire play documented by Cotterall are a function not of changes inattraction to fire but rather of changes in willingness to disobey ruleschanges in opportunities to engage in proscribed behavior outside of
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 436
A BURNING DESIRE 437
adult supervision and changes in access to sources of ignition Tellinglyacross ages the principal motives for fire starting are ldquojust for funrdquo ldquotosee what would happenrdquo ldquoto destroy somethingrdquo and ldquoboredomrdquo pat-terns that are even more marked among those who reported extensivefire play Equally important knowledge regarding institutionally-conveyedfire safety practices had virtually no relationship with the extent of fireplay
An indirect measure of childrenrsquos fire-related activity can be derivedfrom records of fires that whether by design or accident becomesufficiently large as to attract the attention of fire departments Okulitchand Pinsonneault (2002) compiled records of 4600 fires involving juve-niles in Oregon between 1996 and 2000 Twelve-year olds accountedfor the largest proportion of these fires with a steady increase in involve-ment from ages 1 to 12 and a steady decrease in involvement after age12 If we assume that in at least some sizable fraction of these firesthe fire starter had no intention of creating a conflagration sufficientlylarge as to result in the involvement of the authorities (cf Kafry 1980)then comparing this pattern to Cotterallrsquos findings suggests that in NorthAmerica age 12 constitutes the dangerous apex of the combination offactors listed above (willingness to disobey rules etc) and incompletemastery of fire such that it escapes the fire starterrsquos control
Lastly although not presented in the context of quantitative datadrawing on her experience with firesetters in Massachusetts Pinsonneaultconcludes that ldquo[c]ommon questions children have about fire includelsquoWhat makes fire hot How does a small fire grow Why are somefires very smoky Can everything burn How can you keep a firesmall How can you put fires outrdquo (Pinsonneault 2002223) Importantlythese are exactly the sort of questions that we might expect to be fore-most in the minds of individuals whose curiousity is not simply the prod-uct of a general interest in the world but rather reflects a domain-specificinformation-gathering system the purpose of which is to acquire the abil-ity to control fire
Although the studies reviewed above vary considerably in their detailsthey can be roughly summarized as follows a) western children firstbecome curious about fire in early childhood b) experimentation withfire increases as a function of age often extending well into adolescenceand c) for many individuals some attraction to fire persists into maturity
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 437
438 DANIEL M T FESSLER
a pattern consistent with the entertainment value that many westernadults place on activities such as gazing into a fire The question remainshowever as to whether this trajectory directly reflects the workings of adevelopmental information acquisition system governed by an evolvedpsychological mechanism In particular it is telling that much fire playoccurs in adolescence in western populations First as was arguably truein most ancestral human societies in many small-scale societies todayadolescents particularly females engage in a great deal of productiveunsupervised economic activity (cf Kaplan Hill Lancaster amp Hurtado2000) Given that fire is an elementary part of the human tool kit itwould be odd if the acquisition of fire-control skills was normally soretarded that additional experimentation was still required during thesame phase of life when significant economic productivity has alreadycommenced Second a hallmark of adolescence in western nations is asubstantial increase in mobility and autonomy changes that often pre-cipitate engagement in proscribed activities that had previously been pre-cluded by caretaker supervision Combined with strong prohibitionsagainst fire play and for many limited exposure to fire on a daily basisthis pattern means that in much of the developed world adolescenceoften constitutes the first opportunity to extensively experiment with fireTogether these observations suggest that while studies of fire play inthe West are interesting in as much as they reveal considerable moti-vation to explore fire from a young age they nevertheless present whatis likely a highly distorted portrait of the developmental unfolding of amechanism aimed at acquiring fire knowledge and skills
Childrenrsquos interactions with fire in societies in which fire isroutinely used as a tool
Children and fire in Bengkulu Sumatra
Between 1990 and 1993 I conducted ethnographic fieldwork in a semi-traditional Bengkulu Malay fishing village on the west coast of SumatraAlthough I did not systematically collect data on childrenrsquos interactionswith fire my immersion in village life was such that I neverthelessrecorded many offhand observations and impressions allowing for asketch of childrenrsquos interactions with fire
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 438
A BURNING DESIRE 439
Because childcare duties and cooking duties were often delegated tothe same individuals from infancy on children in Bengkulu had ampleopportunity to observe others controlling fire Small children often saton or near their caretakers while the latter manipulated fire caretakersbrushed the child aside with a scolding if the child reached for burningor hot items but otherwise offered no instruction regarding the controlof fire Childrenrsquos autonomous manipulation of fire typically began aroundage 4 About this time children were allowed to build small fires andfrequently did cooking either mud pies and other pretend foods or actualmorsels Adults did not instruct children with regard to either buildingor maintaining a fire at most snapping at a child if play with or nearfire posed a danger the only input that might be considered pedagog-ical came from slightly older children who would sometimes narratetheir actions using a type of play-speech while handling fire Childrenrsquosinterest in such ldquokidrsquos firesrdquo seemed to peak around age 6-7 and dimin-ished rapidly thereafter disappearing entirely before age 10 Childrenages 3-6 sometimes poked at jumped over and similarly toyed withadult fires (resulting in one serious burn during my stay) but this waslimited in scope and frequency and again had largely subsided by mid-dle childhood Children age 6 and up were often sent to a neighborrsquoshouse to fetch burning embers for fire-starting By age 8 both girls andboys were commonly performing adult chores including cooking andtending fires and their interactions with fire were increasingly utilitar-ian in nature Adolescents and young adults (particularly men nearly allof whom smoked) would occasionally idlely flick cigarrette lighters toywith matches or poke at burning candles but such behavior was moreakin to fiddling than to interested experimentation and was not char-acterized by any excitement The only behavior that I observed thatcould even remotely be classified as fascination with fire occurred whena fad for making cap bombs swept the village boys age 5-8 would mod-ify old spark plugs to form the body of the bomb scrape match headsto obtain gunpowder then load the projectiles and throw them upwardsqueeling with glee when they produced a resounding Bang upon impactwith the ground
To summarize my (admittedly unsystematic) ethnographic observa-tions in one Bengkulu village children experienced early interaction withfire but received little or no instruction in controlling it Typically children
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 439
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
430 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Introduction
The use of fire is a human universal a behavior present in virtually allsocieties (Brown 1991) Indeed while there is debate as to the earliestevidence for the controlled use of fire evolutionary anthropologists tracethe manipulation of fire far beyond the origins of our species ndash withsuggestive findings dated as early as 790000 years ago (Goren-Inbar et al 2004) and some even surpassing the one million year mark (Brainamp Sillen 1988) it is clear that the history of hominidsrsquo exploitation offire is quite deep The utility of fire for our hunter-gatherer ancestorsand their predecessor species was likely multiplex In addition to firersquosobvious benefits as a source of warmth and light fire played a key rolein the evolution of the human diet as cooking would have allowed ourspecies to exploit a vastly expanded array of plant and animal foods(Ragir 2000 Stanford 1999 Wrangham Jones Laden Pilbeam ampConklin-Brittain 1999) Likewise the control of fire allowed for appli-cations in hunting combating predators and hostile conspecifics man-aging wild plant resources and tool production (cf Clark amp Harris1985) Of course at no point in our speciesrsquo history will fire have con-stituted an unadulterated good ndash together with the smoke that it pro-duces fire is a significant source of injury and death a pattern reflectedin most animalsrsquo wariness of fire
With a deep evolutionary history and a profound impact on fitnessthere is every reason to believe that fire has been a source of recurrentand substantial selective pressures shaping human behavior and the psy-chological architecture that underlies it However despite the uncontrover-sial perhaps incontrovertible nature of this conclusion to date evolutionarypsychologists have largely ignored firersquos role in human evolution Thepurpose of this paper is to call attention to this lacuna and suggest somepossible solutions
The human use of fire can be broken down into two elementarycomponents namely controlling fire and producing fire Fire occurs nat-urally due to lightning strikes volcanic activity and concentrated solarradiation In contrast the artificial production of fire requires highly spe-cialized tools techniques and materials While this suggests that earlyhominids acquired the ability to control fire long before they were ableto produce it importantly all available evidence indicates that like the
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 430
A BURNING DESIRE 431
production of fire the control of fire is a learned behavior that is pro-foundly contingent on experience This observation merits further con-sideration By way of contrast consider the manufacture of the spiderrsquosweb or the salmonrsquos nest While each involves relatively complex con-structive behavior that employs variable features of the environment inlight of the life cycles of these organisms these activities are necessarilygoverned by innate templates rather than acquired information Givena) the chronological depth of the hominid relationship with fire b) thebenefits of controlling fire and c) the costs of erring in this enterprisethis raises the question as to why natural selection did not similarly favorthe evolution of largely innate fire-management skills in humans Onepossible explanation is that unlike spiders or salmon humans and theirpredecessors occupied a wide range of ecosystems
Many of the environments occupied by humans are characterizedby enormous variety in the features relevant to controlling fire princi-pal among which is the nature of available fuels Combustibles vary withregard to a number of properties relevant to controlling fire includingease of ignition rapidity of combustion and explosiveness Accordinglyhad natural selection favored the evolution of a template or schema akinto those that appear to govern some animal constructions (ie the pat-terned use of materials having differing specified properties in a set ofdiscrete tasks characterized by a fixed temporal sequence) such a tem-plate would have been of limited utility as it would necessarily havebeen parochial to a given ecosystem due to its reliance on fixed typesrather than attributes This is because unlike for example the twigsand feathers used to construct a birdrsquos nest many of the properties ofcombustibles are not detectable on the basis of surface features ndash exam-ining downed tree limbs for example will not reveal the features ofcombustion typical of each type of wood to say nothing of inspectingmaterials such as animal fat beeswax or tar Because the techniquesinvolved in building and maintaining a fire are largely dependent on thefuels selected any pre-existing template for such techniques would havehad to specify the fuels to be employed Given that the only way thatnatural selection could have produced a fire-management template wouldthus have been to specify fixed ingredients (akin for example to thebeaverrsquos fondness for willows cottonwood and aspen) and given thatsuch a template would therefore have failed to translate effectively across
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 431
432 DANIEL M T FESSLER
ecosystems the only avenue open to selection processes operating on aspecies as wide-ranging as ourselves was to rely on learning for the acqui-sition of the requisite behaviors
Importantly contrary to portraits common in the conventional socialscience literature a reliance on acquired information in no way indi-cates the absence of domain-specific evolved psychological mechanisms(see Tooby Cosmides amp Barrett 2005) On the contrary beginning withGarcia Ervin and Koellingrsquos (1966) seminal demonstration of special-purpose mechanisms dedicated to the acquisition of toxin-avoidancebehaviors evolutionists have embraced a perspective wherein psycho-logical adaptations can operate via a predisposition to attend to discretecues and particular sources of information in order to learn about specificfacets of the environment Well-documented examples include snakedetection in primates and humans (Mineka Davidson Cook amp Keir1984 Oumlhman 1993) and inbreeding-relevant kin recognition in humans(Wolf 1993)
Expected properties of a mechanism dedicated to fire learning
In exploring the properties that we might expect to characterize theinformation-acquisition mechanisms specific to the problem of control-ling fire it is useful to begin by considering the logical features of thetask domain Parallels between this domain and that of another better-studied information-acquisition task can shed light on these features Forat least two reasons the task domain of learning to control fire is akinto that of learning to cope with threats posed by predatory animalsFirst paralleling the problem of identifying and differentiating amongfuels although some cues are shared by many predators (eg largesharp teeth) these cues are not universal and moreover the color sizemorphology and behavior of predators varies widely across ecosystemsmaking it difficult for natural selection to imbue human minds withinnate predator-recognition templates (Barrett 2005) Second general-ized feedback-based learning is inappropriate to the task of acquiringinformation about predators since particularly for children the costs ofsuch learning would be prohibitively high ndash as Barrett observes ldquoA child
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 432
A BURNING DESIRE 433
that requires attack or injury to learn that an animal is dangerous isunlikely to survive for longrdquo (2005217) Correspondingly if childrenwere to acquire their knowledge of fire exclusively through individualtrial-and-error learning a large percentage would suffer serious or fatalburns
Barrett (2005) outlines five features that can be expected to charac-terize the information acquisition system dedicated to learning aboutpredators we can expect parallels to exist for each of these features inthe domain of controlling fire First learning can be expected to occurwithout extrinsic motivation Just as dangerous animals appear to holdconsiderable fascination for children so too can children be expected tobe spontaneously interested in fire ndash children are predicted to be curi-ous about the flammability of various materials and interested in theconsequences of manipulating or rearranging burning objects addingobjects to or removing objects from a fire and so on Second we canexpect information to be acquired rapidly often on the basis of only asingle exposure To acquire a new animal concept children are expectedto need only a single encounter or to hear only once about the attrib-utes of a dangerous animal Likewise fire learning should be rapid inresponse to minimal exposure ndash information relevant to the control offire is predicted to have high salience such that children will attend tothis information and recall a greater percentage of it following exposurethan will be the case with respect to information relevant to otherdomains that is acquired through general-purpose learning mechanismsThird both because it allows low-cost learning-at-a-distance and becauseit tracks local ecological circumstances socially-transmitted informationconstitutes a valuable resource for both the student of predators and thestudent of fire Just as members of a local group act as a reservoir ofaccumulated observations regarding the identifying attributes and char-acteristic behaviors of indigenous animals so too can othersrsquo knowledgeof the fire-relevant properties of locally-available materials be expectedto play a valuable role in learning to use fire in a given ecosystemFourth the information acquisition system can be expected to employbiases or prior structures that guide learning in the specified domainFor example Barrett suggests that childrenrsquos learning about animals maybe guided by such fundamental categorical distinctions as dangerous ver-sus harmless carnivore versus herbivore and so on Correspondingly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 433
434 DANIEL M T FESSLER
learning about fire may be structured by dichotomies such as flammableversus nonflammable or more broadly things that intensify fires andthings that diminish fires Lastly acquisition of procedural knowledgemay be achieved in part through the operation of dedicated mechanismsthat serve to generate relevant experience in a safe context Just as chaseplay an intrinsically rewarding activity for children may serve to honepredator-prey pursuit and evasion skills (Steen amp Owens 2001) so toomay childrenrsquos manipulations of small fires embers and the like pro-vide a means of acquiring relevant experience in a setting that is saferthan a full-scale cooking or heating fire
Existing literature Childrenrsquos fire play and fire setting inmodern societies
Testing the five sets of predictions described above will require struc-tured experiments involving young children from diverse cultures Becausesuch an enterprise is not entered into lightly it is worth exploring herethe extent to which available findings are congruent with the portrait ofhuman fire psychology outlined above A voluminous literature addressesthe topic of fire setting by children and juveniles Importantly fire set-ting is a broad category of behavior encompassing everything from play-ing with matches to arson The perspective developed here suggests thatfor the child observation of and interaction with fire will often be endsin themselves a motivational orientation that differs markedly from thatwhich pertains when fire is used as a weapon to intentionally inflict dam-age or harm Consistent with this distinction public safety experts dis-tinguish so-called lsquofire playrsquo from other behaviors involving fire definingfire play as ldquoA fire deliberately set for no purpose constructive or destruc-tive beyond the fire itselfrdquo (Hall 20031) This distinction however inno way suggests that fire play is harmless ndash on the contrary fire safetyofficersrsquo concern with fire play is quite justified By way of example inthe US between 1980 and 1999 childrenrsquos fire play resulted in 7306civilian deaths 48922 serious civilian injuries and over 3 billion dol-larsrsquo worth of property damage (Hall 2003) Although governmentalattempts to combat the problem through consumer product safety reg-ulations public information campaigns education plans and interven-
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 434
A BURNING DESIRE 435
tion programs have succeeded in reducing these figures somewhat chil-drenrsquos fire play continues to be a significant source of pain sufferingand expense in modern societies
Much of the literature on fire setting is aimed at characterizing thefeatures of recidivist juvenile fire setters with investigators identifyingattributes and correlates such as cruelty to animals defiance of author-ity and a chaotic or conflictual family environment as risk factors forrecidivism (Kolko 2002) While such research usefully identifies dan-gerous individuals who are relatively resistent to the mechanisms of socialcontrol normally employed to enhance conformity to social standardsthis entreprise generally overshadows the exploration of fire setting amongnon-clinical non-recidivist children Nevertheless despite this bias it ispossible to glean a portrait of such behavior from the existing literature
Kafry (1980) queried 99 lower elementary school boys in BerkeleyCalifornia finding that 45 reported having played with fire and 21reported having caused a fire as a consequence of the latter 18 werecaused by children who were two years of age or younger at the timeof the accident Eighty-one percent of children surveyed reported beinginterested in fire and across ages curiosity was the motive cited mostfrequently to explain the behavior As a comparison group for a clini-cal sample Kolko et al (2001) conducted a three-year longitudinal studyof a community sample of 100 boys and 62 girls age 6-13 (mean =95) with follow-up interviews at one and two years Results reveal quiteconsistent patterns wherein at any one time approximately one-third ofthe children report being interested in fire slightly less than half reportplaying with matches and slightly less than one-third report having setplay fires Viewed individually by the end of the study almost three-quarters of the participants had at some time played with matches orset a play fire Perrin-Wallqvist and Norlander (2003) retrospectively sur-veyed 50 18-year old Swedish men and 45 18-19 year old Swedishwomen Seventy percent of the men reported having played with fireduring childhood and 44 of the women did likewise The principalmotives for childhood fire play were curiosity entertainment and excite-ment seeking a high proportion of subjects reported being fascinated ordrawn to fire Paralleling this result Perrin-Wallqvist et al (Perrin-Wallqvist Archer amp Norlander 2004) surveyed 28 male and 28 female
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 435
436 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Swedish 16-year olds concerning emotional attitudes toward fire While61 thought fire was ldquocozyrdquo and 20 found fire ldquoexcitingrdquo only 9thought that fire was ldquouninterestingrdquo 27 of the respondents found firesufficiently entertaining that they lit fires when bored
Simonsen and Bullis (2001) surveyed 5416 third through eighth gradeOregonian students relatively evenly distributed across ages regardingfire starting interest in fire and motivations for fire play Forty-sevenpercent of students reported having played with fire a retrospective ques-tion revealed that 10 reported starting their first fire between the agesof one and five 27 reported starting their first fire between the agesof six and ten and 10 reported starting their first fire between theages of 11 and 15 Attraction to and interest in fire was quite highalthough only 29 overtly reported being interested in fire 46 reportedliking television programs that involve fire 61 reported enjoying assist-ing adults in lighting or putting out fire 33 reported enjoying burn-ing objects such as twigs grass or paper and 21 reported enjoyingplaying with matches or lighters Correspondingly fire had high enter-tainment value for children with large proportions of respondents cit-ing as motives for fire starting ldquojust for funrdquo (23) and ldquoout of boredomrdquo(19) with curiousity (ldquoto see what would happenrdquo) another significantcontributor (18)
Cotterall (2003) conducted a similar survey of 3031 students fromgrade 3 through 13 in Sudbury Ontario A number of patterns aremarkedly evident First while the frequency of actual fire play shows asteady increase across the age span studied (18 of third graders reporthaving played with matches or lighters in the last year while 81 ofthirteenth graders report having done so) what Cotterall terms lsquoexpressedpreoccupation and fascination with firersquo (eg ldquoAre you curious aboutfirerdquo ldquoAre you really interested in fire and what it can dordquo etc) doesnot vary in any regular fashion across this age range and likewise thelower-level factor that Cotterall terms lsquoexpressed interest in firersquo (egldquoDo you like to start firesrdquo ldquoDo you feel excited when you watch afire burningrdquo ldquoDo you like staring at firerdquo etc) shows only a gradualincrease with age These patterns suggest that the age-related changesin fire play documented by Cotterall are a function not of changes inattraction to fire but rather of changes in willingness to disobey ruleschanges in opportunities to engage in proscribed behavior outside of
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 436
A BURNING DESIRE 437
adult supervision and changes in access to sources of ignition Tellinglyacross ages the principal motives for fire starting are ldquojust for funrdquo ldquotosee what would happenrdquo ldquoto destroy somethingrdquo and ldquoboredomrdquo pat-terns that are even more marked among those who reported extensivefire play Equally important knowledge regarding institutionally-conveyedfire safety practices had virtually no relationship with the extent of fireplay
An indirect measure of childrenrsquos fire-related activity can be derivedfrom records of fires that whether by design or accident becomesufficiently large as to attract the attention of fire departments Okulitchand Pinsonneault (2002) compiled records of 4600 fires involving juve-niles in Oregon between 1996 and 2000 Twelve-year olds accountedfor the largest proportion of these fires with a steady increase in involve-ment from ages 1 to 12 and a steady decrease in involvement after age12 If we assume that in at least some sizable fraction of these firesthe fire starter had no intention of creating a conflagration sufficientlylarge as to result in the involvement of the authorities (cf Kafry 1980)then comparing this pattern to Cotterallrsquos findings suggests that in NorthAmerica age 12 constitutes the dangerous apex of the combination offactors listed above (willingness to disobey rules etc) and incompletemastery of fire such that it escapes the fire starterrsquos control
Lastly although not presented in the context of quantitative datadrawing on her experience with firesetters in Massachusetts Pinsonneaultconcludes that ldquo[c]ommon questions children have about fire includelsquoWhat makes fire hot How does a small fire grow Why are somefires very smoky Can everything burn How can you keep a firesmall How can you put fires outrdquo (Pinsonneault 2002223) Importantlythese are exactly the sort of questions that we might expect to be fore-most in the minds of individuals whose curiousity is not simply the prod-uct of a general interest in the world but rather reflects a domain-specificinformation-gathering system the purpose of which is to acquire the abil-ity to control fire
Although the studies reviewed above vary considerably in their detailsthey can be roughly summarized as follows a) western children firstbecome curious about fire in early childhood b) experimentation withfire increases as a function of age often extending well into adolescenceand c) for many individuals some attraction to fire persists into maturity
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 437
438 DANIEL M T FESSLER
a pattern consistent with the entertainment value that many westernadults place on activities such as gazing into a fire The question remainshowever as to whether this trajectory directly reflects the workings of adevelopmental information acquisition system governed by an evolvedpsychological mechanism In particular it is telling that much fire playoccurs in adolescence in western populations First as was arguably truein most ancestral human societies in many small-scale societies todayadolescents particularly females engage in a great deal of productiveunsupervised economic activity (cf Kaplan Hill Lancaster amp Hurtado2000) Given that fire is an elementary part of the human tool kit itwould be odd if the acquisition of fire-control skills was normally soretarded that additional experimentation was still required during thesame phase of life when significant economic productivity has alreadycommenced Second a hallmark of adolescence in western nations is asubstantial increase in mobility and autonomy changes that often pre-cipitate engagement in proscribed activities that had previously been pre-cluded by caretaker supervision Combined with strong prohibitionsagainst fire play and for many limited exposure to fire on a daily basisthis pattern means that in much of the developed world adolescenceoften constitutes the first opportunity to extensively experiment with fireTogether these observations suggest that while studies of fire play inthe West are interesting in as much as they reveal considerable moti-vation to explore fire from a young age they nevertheless present whatis likely a highly distorted portrait of the developmental unfolding of amechanism aimed at acquiring fire knowledge and skills
Childrenrsquos interactions with fire in societies in which fire isroutinely used as a tool
Children and fire in Bengkulu Sumatra
Between 1990 and 1993 I conducted ethnographic fieldwork in a semi-traditional Bengkulu Malay fishing village on the west coast of SumatraAlthough I did not systematically collect data on childrenrsquos interactionswith fire my immersion in village life was such that I neverthelessrecorded many offhand observations and impressions allowing for asketch of childrenrsquos interactions with fire
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 438
A BURNING DESIRE 439
Because childcare duties and cooking duties were often delegated tothe same individuals from infancy on children in Bengkulu had ampleopportunity to observe others controlling fire Small children often saton or near their caretakers while the latter manipulated fire caretakersbrushed the child aside with a scolding if the child reached for burningor hot items but otherwise offered no instruction regarding the controlof fire Childrenrsquos autonomous manipulation of fire typically began aroundage 4 About this time children were allowed to build small fires andfrequently did cooking either mud pies and other pretend foods or actualmorsels Adults did not instruct children with regard to either buildingor maintaining a fire at most snapping at a child if play with or nearfire posed a danger the only input that might be considered pedagog-ical came from slightly older children who would sometimes narratetheir actions using a type of play-speech while handling fire Childrenrsquosinterest in such ldquokidrsquos firesrdquo seemed to peak around age 6-7 and dimin-ished rapidly thereafter disappearing entirely before age 10 Childrenages 3-6 sometimes poked at jumped over and similarly toyed withadult fires (resulting in one serious burn during my stay) but this waslimited in scope and frequency and again had largely subsided by mid-dle childhood Children age 6 and up were often sent to a neighborrsquoshouse to fetch burning embers for fire-starting By age 8 both girls andboys were commonly performing adult chores including cooking andtending fires and their interactions with fire were increasingly utilitar-ian in nature Adolescents and young adults (particularly men nearly allof whom smoked) would occasionally idlely flick cigarrette lighters toywith matches or poke at burning candles but such behavior was moreakin to fiddling than to interested experimentation and was not char-acterized by any excitement The only behavior that I observed thatcould even remotely be classified as fascination with fire occurred whena fad for making cap bombs swept the village boys age 5-8 would mod-ify old spark plugs to form the body of the bomb scrape match headsto obtain gunpowder then load the projectiles and throw them upwardsqueeling with glee when they produced a resounding Bang upon impactwith the ground
To summarize my (admittedly unsystematic) ethnographic observa-tions in one Bengkulu village children experienced early interaction withfire but received little or no instruction in controlling it Typically children
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 439
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
A BURNING DESIRE 431
production of fire the control of fire is a learned behavior that is pro-foundly contingent on experience This observation merits further con-sideration By way of contrast consider the manufacture of the spiderrsquosweb or the salmonrsquos nest While each involves relatively complex con-structive behavior that employs variable features of the environment inlight of the life cycles of these organisms these activities are necessarilygoverned by innate templates rather than acquired information Givena) the chronological depth of the hominid relationship with fire b) thebenefits of controlling fire and c) the costs of erring in this enterprisethis raises the question as to why natural selection did not similarly favorthe evolution of largely innate fire-management skills in humans Onepossible explanation is that unlike spiders or salmon humans and theirpredecessors occupied a wide range of ecosystems
Many of the environments occupied by humans are characterizedby enormous variety in the features relevant to controlling fire princi-pal among which is the nature of available fuels Combustibles vary withregard to a number of properties relevant to controlling fire includingease of ignition rapidity of combustion and explosiveness Accordinglyhad natural selection favored the evolution of a template or schema akinto those that appear to govern some animal constructions (ie the pat-terned use of materials having differing specified properties in a set ofdiscrete tasks characterized by a fixed temporal sequence) such a tem-plate would have been of limited utility as it would necessarily havebeen parochial to a given ecosystem due to its reliance on fixed typesrather than attributes This is because unlike for example the twigsand feathers used to construct a birdrsquos nest many of the properties ofcombustibles are not detectable on the basis of surface features ndash exam-ining downed tree limbs for example will not reveal the features ofcombustion typical of each type of wood to say nothing of inspectingmaterials such as animal fat beeswax or tar Because the techniquesinvolved in building and maintaining a fire are largely dependent on thefuels selected any pre-existing template for such techniques would havehad to specify the fuels to be employed Given that the only way thatnatural selection could have produced a fire-management template wouldthus have been to specify fixed ingredients (akin for example to thebeaverrsquos fondness for willows cottonwood and aspen) and given thatsuch a template would therefore have failed to translate effectively across
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 431
432 DANIEL M T FESSLER
ecosystems the only avenue open to selection processes operating on aspecies as wide-ranging as ourselves was to rely on learning for the acqui-sition of the requisite behaviors
Importantly contrary to portraits common in the conventional socialscience literature a reliance on acquired information in no way indi-cates the absence of domain-specific evolved psychological mechanisms(see Tooby Cosmides amp Barrett 2005) On the contrary beginning withGarcia Ervin and Koellingrsquos (1966) seminal demonstration of special-purpose mechanisms dedicated to the acquisition of toxin-avoidancebehaviors evolutionists have embraced a perspective wherein psycho-logical adaptations can operate via a predisposition to attend to discretecues and particular sources of information in order to learn about specificfacets of the environment Well-documented examples include snakedetection in primates and humans (Mineka Davidson Cook amp Keir1984 Oumlhman 1993) and inbreeding-relevant kin recognition in humans(Wolf 1993)
Expected properties of a mechanism dedicated to fire learning
In exploring the properties that we might expect to characterize theinformation-acquisition mechanisms specific to the problem of control-ling fire it is useful to begin by considering the logical features of thetask domain Parallels between this domain and that of another better-studied information-acquisition task can shed light on these features Forat least two reasons the task domain of learning to control fire is akinto that of learning to cope with threats posed by predatory animalsFirst paralleling the problem of identifying and differentiating amongfuels although some cues are shared by many predators (eg largesharp teeth) these cues are not universal and moreover the color sizemorphology and behavior of predators varies widely across ecosystemsmaking it difficult for natural selection to imbue human minds withinnate predator-recognition templates (Barrett 2005) Second general-ized feedback-based learning is inappropriate to the task of acquiringinformation about predators since particularly for children the costs ofsuch learning would be prohibitively high ndash as Barrett observes ldquoA child
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 432
A BURNING DESIRE 433
that requires attack or injury to learn that an animal is dangerous isunlikely to survive for longrdquo (2005217) Correspondingly if childrenwere to acquire their knowledge of fire exclusively through individualtrial-and-error learning a large percentage would suffer serious or fatalburns
Barrett (2005) outlines five features that can be expected to charac-terize the information acquisition system dedicated to learning aboutpredators we can expect parallels to exist for each of these features inthe domain of controlling fire First learning can be expected to occurwithout extrinsic motivation Just as dangerous animals appear to holdconsiderable fascination for children so too can children be expected tobe spontaneously interested in fire ndash children are predicted to be curi-ous about the flammability of various materials and interested in theconsequences of manipulating or rearranging burning objects addingobjects to or removing objects from a fire and so on Second we canexpect information to be acquired rapidly often on the basis of only asingle exposure To acquire a new animal concept children are expectedto need only a single encounter or to hear only once about the attrib-utes of a dangerous animal Likewise fire learning should be rapid inresponse to minimal exposure ndash information relevant to the control offire is predicted to have high salience such that children will attend tothis information and recall a greater percentage of it following exposurethan will be the case with respect to information relevant to otherdomains that is acquired through general-purpose learning mechanismsThird both because it allows low-cost learning-at-a-distance and becauseit tracks local ecological circumstances socially-transmitted informationconstitutes a valuable resource for both the student of predators and thestudent of fire Just as members of a local group act as a reservoir ofaccumulated observations regarding the identifying attributes and char-acteristic behaviors of indigenous animals so too can othersrsquo knowledgeof the fire-relevant properties of locally-available materials be expectedto play a valuable role in learning to use fire in a given ecosystemFourth the information acquisition system can be expected to employbiases or prior structures that guide learning in the specified domainFor example Barrett suggests that childrenrsquos learning about animals maybe guided by such fundamental categorical distinctions as dangerous ver-sus harmless carnivore versus herbivore and so on Correspondingly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 433
434 DANIEL M T FESSLER
learning about fire may be structured by dichotomies such as flammableversus nonflammable or more broadly things that intensify fires andthings that diminish fires Lastly acquisition of procedural knowledgemay be achieved in part through the operation of dedicated mechanismsthat serve to generate relevant experience in a safe context Just as chaseplay an intrinsically rewarding activity for children may serve to honepredator-prey pursuit and evasion skills (Steen amp Owens 2001) so toomay childrenrsquos manipulations of small fires embers and the like pro-vide a means of acquiring relevant experience in a setting that is saferthan a full-scale cooking or heating fire
Existing literature Childrenrsquos fire play and fire setting inmodern societies
Testing the five sets of predictions described above will require struc-tured experiments involving young children from diverse cultures Becausesuch an enterprise is not entered into lightly it is worth exploring herethe extent to which available findings are congruent with the portrait ofhuman fire psychology outlined above A voluminous literature addressesthe topic of fire setting by children and juveniles Importantly fire set-ting is a broad category of behavior encompassing everything from play-ing with matches to arson The perspective developed here suggests thatfor the child observation of and interaction with fire will often be endsin themselves a motivational orientation that differs markedly from thatwhich pertains when fire is used as a weapon to intentionally inflict dam-age or harm Consistent with this distinction public safety experts dis-tinguish so-called lsquofire playrsquo from other behaviors involving fire definingfire play as ldquoA fire deliberately set for no purpose constructive or destruc-tive beyond the fire itselfrdquo (Hall 20031) This distinction however inno way suggests that fire play is harmless ndash on the contrary fire safetyofficersrsquo concern with fire play is quite justified By way of example inthe US between 1980 and 1999 childrenrsquos fire play resulted in 7306civilian deaths 48922 serious civilian injuries and over 3 billion dol-larsrsquo worth of property damage (Hall 2003) Although governmentalattempts to combat the problem through consumer product safety reg-ulations public information campaigns education plans and interven-
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 434
A BURNING DESIRE 435
tion programs have succeeded in reducing these figures somewhat chil-drenrsquos fire play continues to be a significant source of pain sufferingand expense in modern societies
Much of the literature on fire setting is aimed at characterizing thefeatures of recidivist juvenile fire setters with investigators identifyingattributes and correlates such as cruelty to animals defiance of author-ity and a chaotic or conflictual family environment as risk factors forrecidivism (Kolko 2002) While such research usefully identifies dan-gerous individuals who are relatively resistent to the mechanisms of socialcontrol normally employed to enhance conformity to social standardsthis entreprise generally overshadows the exploration of fire setting amongnon-clinical non-recidivist children Nevertheless despite this bias it ispossible to glean a portrait of such behavior from the existing literature
Kafry (1980) queried 99 lower elementary school boys in BerkeleyCalifornia finding that 45 reported having played with fire and 21reported having caused a fire as a consequence of the latter 18 werecaused by children who were two years of age or younger at the timeof the accident Eighty-one percent of children surveyed reported beinginterested in fire and across ages curiosity was the motive cited mostfrequently to explain the behavior As a comparison group for a clini-cal sample Kolko et al (2001) conducted a three-year longitudinal studyof a community sample of 100 boys and 62 girls age 6-13 (mean =95) with follow-up interviews at one and two years Results reveal quiteconsistent patterns wherein at any one time approximately one-third ofthe children report being interested in fire slightly less than half reportplaying with matches and slightly less than one-third report having setplay fires Viewed individually by the end of the study almost three-quarters of the participants had at some time played with matches orset a play fire Perrin-Wallqvist and Norlander (2003) retrospectively sur-veyed 50 18-year old Swedish men and 45 18-19 year old Swedishwomen Seventy percent of the men reported having played with fireduring childhood and 44 of the women did likewise The principalmotives for childhood fire play were curiosity entertainment and excite-ment seeking a high proportion of subjects reported being fascinated ordrawn to fire Paralleling this result Perrin-Wallqvist et al (Perrin-Wallqvist Archer amp Norlander 2004) surveyed 28 male and 28 female
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 435
436 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Swedish 16-year olds concerning emotional attitudes toward fire While61 thought fire was ldquocozyrdquo and 20 found fire ldquoexcitingrdquo only 9thought that fire was ldquouninterestingrdquo 27 of the respondents found firesufficiently entertaining that they lit fires when bored
Simonsen and Bullis (2001) surveyed 5416 third through eighth gradeOregonian students relatively evenly distributed across ages regardingfire starting interest in fire and motivations for fire play Forty-sevenpercent of students reported having played with fire a retrospective ques-tion revealed that 10 reported starting their first fire between the agesof one and five 27 reported starting their first fire between the agesof six and ten and 10 reported starting their first fire between theages of 11 and 15 Attraction to and interest in fire was quite highalthough only 29 overtly reported being interested in fire 46 reportedliking television programs that involve fire 61 reported enjoying assist-ing adults in lighting or putting out fire 33 reported enjoying burn-ing objects such as twigs grass or paper and 21 reported enjoyingplaying with matches or lighters Correspondingly fire had high enter-tainment value for children with large proportions of respondents cit-ing as motives for fire starting ldquojust for funrdquo (23) and ldquoout of boredomrdquo(19) with curiousity (ldquoto see what would happenrdquo) another significantcontributor (18)
Cotterall (2003) conducted a similar survey of 3031 students fromgrade 3 through 13 in Sudbury Ontario A number of patterns aremarkedly evident First while the frequency of actual fire play shows asteady increase across the age span studied (18 of third graders reporthaving played with matches or lighters in the last year while 81 ofthirteenth graders report having done so) what Cotterall terms lsquoexpressedpreoccupation and fascination with firersquo (eg ldquoAre you curious aboutfirerdquo ldquoAre you really interested in fire and what it can dordquo etc) doesnot vary in any regular fashion across this age range and likewise thelower-level factor that Cotterall terms lsquoexpressed interest in firersquo (egldquoDo you like to start firesrdquo ldquoDo you feel excited when you watch afire burningrdquo ldquoDo you like staring at firerdquo etc) shows only a gradualincrease with age These patterns suggest that the age-related changesin fire play documented by Cotterall are a function not of changes inattraction to fire but rather of changes in willingness to disobey ruleschanges in opportunities to engage in proscribed behavior outside of
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 436
A BURNING DESIRE 437
adult supervision and changes in access to sources of ignition Tellinglyacross ages the principal motives for fire starting are ldquojust for funrdquo ldquotosee what would happenrdquo ldquoto destroy somethingrdquo and ldquoboredomrdquo pat-terns that are even more marked among those who reported extensivefire play Equally important knowledge regarding institutionally-conveyedfire safety practices had virtually no relationship with the extent of fireplay
An indirect measure of childrenrsquos fire-related activity can be derivedfrom records of fires that whether by design or accident becomesufficiently large as to attract the attention of fire departments Okulitchand Pinsonneault (2002) compiled records of 4600 fires involving juve-niles in Oregon between 1996 and 2000 Twelve-year olds accountedfor the largest proportion of these fires with a steady increase in involve-ment from ages 1 to 12 and a steady decrease in involvement after age12 If we assume that in at least some sizable fraction of these firesthe fire starter had no intention of creating a conflagration sufficientlylarge as to result in the involvement of the authorities (cf Kafry 1980)then comparing this pattern to Cotterallrsquos findings suggests that in NorthAmerica age 12 constitutes the dangerous apex of the combination offactors listed above (willingness to disobey rules etc) and incompletemastery of fire such that it escapes the fire starterrsquos control
Lastly although not presented in the context of quantitative datadrawing on her experience with firesetters in Massachusetts Pinsonneaultconcludes that ldquo[c]ommon questions children have about fire includelsquoWhat makes fire hot How does a small fire grow Why are somefires very smoky Can everything burn How can you keep a firesmall How can you put fires outrdquo (Pinsonneault 2002223) Importantlythese are exactly the sort of questions that we might expect to be fore-most in the minds of individuals whose curiousity is not simply the prod-uct of a general interest in the world but rather reflects a domain-specificinformation-gathering system the purpose of which is to acquire the abil-ity to control fire
Although the studies reviewed above vary considerably in their detailsthey can be roughly summarized as follows a) western children firstbecome curious about fire in early childhood b) experimentation withfire increases as a function of age often extending well into adolescenceand c) for many individuals some attraction to fire persists into maturity
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 437
438 DANIEL M T FESSLER
a pattern consistent with the entertainment value that many westernadults place on activities such as gazing into a fire The question remainshowever as to whether this trajectory directly reflects the workings of adevelopmental information acquisition system governed by an evolvedpsychological mechanism In particular it is telling that much fire playoccurs in adolescence in western populations First as was arguably truein most ancestral human societies in many small-scale societies todayadolescents particularly females engage in a great deal of productiveunsupervised economic activity (cf Kaplan Hill Lancaster amp Hurtado2000) Given that fire is an elementary part of the human tool kit itwould be odd if the acquisition of fire-control skills was normally soretarded that additional experimentation was still required during thesame phase of life when significant economic productivity has alreadycommenced Second a hallmark of adolescence in western nations is asubstantial increase in mobility and autonomy changes that often pre-cipitate engagement in proscribed activities that had previously been pre-cluded by caretaker supervision Combined with strong prohibitionsagainst fire play and for many limited exposure to fire on a daily basisthis pattern means that in much of the developed world adolescenceoften constitutes the first opportunity to extensively experiment with fireTogether these observations suggest that while studies of fire play inthe West are interesting in as much as they reveal considerable moti-vation to explore fire from a young age they nevertheless present whatis likely a highly distorted portrait of the developmental unfolding of amechanism aimed at acquiring fire knowledge and skills
Childrenrsquos interactions with fire in societies in which fire isroutinely used as a tool
Children and fire in Bengkulu Sumatra
Between 1990 and 1993 I conducted ethnographic fieldwork in a semi-traditional Bengkulu Malay fishing village on the west coast of SumatraAlthough I did not systematically collect data on childrenrsquos interactionswith fire my immersion in village life was such that I neverthelessrecorded many offhand observations and impressions allowing for asketch of childrenrsquos interactions with fire
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 438
A BURNING DESIRE 439
Because childcare duties and cooking duties were often delegated tothe same individuals from infancy on children in Bengkulu had ampleopportunity to observe others controlling fire Small children often saton or near their caretakers while the latter manipulated fire caretakersbrushed the child aside with a scolding if the child reached for burningor hot items but otherwise offered no instruction regarding the controlof fire Childrenrsquos autonomous manipulation of fire typically began aroundage 4 About this time children were allowed to build small fires andfrequently did cooking either mud pies and other pretend foods or actualmorsels Adults did not instruct children with regard to either buildingor maintaining a fire at most snapping at a child if play with or nearfire posed a danger the only input that might be considered pedagog-ical came from slightly older children who would sometimes narratetheir actions using a type of play-speech while handling fire Childrenrsquosinterest in such ldquokidrsquos firesrdquo seemed to peak around age 6-7 and dimin-ished rapidly thereafter disappearing entirely before age 10 Childrenages 3-6 sometimes poked at jumped over and similarly toyed withadult fires (resulting in one serious burn during my stay) but this waslimited in scope and frequency and again had largely subsided by mid-dle childhood Children age 6 and up were often sent to a neighborrsquoshouse to fetch burning embers for fire-starting By age 8 both girls andboys were commonly performing adult chores including cooking andtending fires and their interactions with fire were increasingly utilitar-ian in nature Adolescents and young adults (particularly men nearly allof whom smoked) would occasionally idlely flick cigarrette lighters toywith matches or poke at burning candles but such behavior was moreakin to fiddling than to interested experimentation and was not char-acterized by any excitement The only behavior that I observed thatcould even remotely be classified as fascination with fire occurred whena fad for making cap bombs swept the village boys age 5-8 would mod-ify old spark plugs to form the body of the bomb scrape match headsto obtain gunpowder then load the projectiles and throw them upwardsqueeling with glee when they produced a resounding Bang upon impactwith the ground
To summarize my (admittedly unsystematic) ethnographic observa-tions in one Bengkulu village children experienced early interaction withfire but received little or no instruction in controlling it Typically children
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 439
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
432 DANIEL M T FESSLER
ecosystems the only avenue open to selection processes operating on aspecies as wide-ranging as ourselves was to rely on learning for the acqui-sition of the requisite behaviors
Importantly contrary to portraits common in the conventional socialscience literature a reliance on acquired information in no way indi-cates the absence of domain-specific evolved psychological mechanisms(see Tooby Cosmides amp Barrett 2005) On the contrary beginning withGarcia Ervin and Koellingrsquos (1966) seminal demonstration of special-purpose mechanisms dedicated to the acquisition of toxin-avoidancebehaviors evolutionists have embraced a perspective wherein psycho-logical adaptations can operate via a predisposition to attend to discretecues and particular sources of information in order to learn about specificfacets of the environment Well-documented examples include snakedetection in primates and humans (Mineka Davidson Cook amp Keir1984 Oumlhman 1993) and inbreeding-relevant kin recognition in humans(Wolf 1993)
Expected properties of a mechanism dedicated to fire learning
In exploring the properties that we might expect to characterize theinformation-acquisition mechanisms specific to the problem of control-ling fire it is useful to begin by considering the logical features of thetask domain Parallels between this domain and that of another better-studied information-acquisition task can shed light on these features Forat least two reasons the task domain of learning to control fire is akinto that of learning to cope with threats posed by predatory animalsFirst paralleling the problem of identifying and differentiating amongfuels although some cues are shared by many predators (eg largesharp teeth) these cues are not universal and moreover the color sizemorphology and behavior of predators varies widely across ecosystemsmaking it difficult for natural selection to imbue human minds withinnate predator-recognition templates (Barrett 2005) Second general-ized feedback-based learning is inappropriate to the task of acquiringinformation about predators since particularly for children the costs ofsuch learning would be prohibitively high ndash as Barrett observes ldquoA child
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 432
A BURNING DESIRE 433
that requires attack or injury to learn that an animal is dangerous isunlikely to survive for longrdquo (2005217) Correspondingly if childrenwere to acquire their knowledge of fire exclusively through individualtrial-and-error learning a large percentage would suffer serious or fatalburns
Barrett (2005) outlines five features that can be expected to charac-terize the information acquisition system dedicated to learning aboutpredators we can expect parallels to exist for each of these features inthe domain of controlling fire First learning can be expected to occurwithout extrinsic motivation Just as dangerous animals appear to holdconsiderable fascination for children so too can children be expected tobe spontaneously interested in fire ndash children are predicted to be curi-ous about the flammability of various materials and interested in theconsequences of manipulating or rearranging burning objects addingobjects to or removing objects from a fire and so on Second we canexpect information to be acquired rapidly often on the basis of only asingle exposure To acquire a new animal concept children are expectedto need only a single encounter or to hear only once about the attrib-utes of a dangerous animal Likewise fire learning should be rapid inresponse to minimal exposure ndash information relevant to the control offire is predicted to have high salience such that children will attend tothis information and recall a greater percentage of it following exposurethan will be the case with respect to information relevant to otherdomains that is acquired through general-purpose learning mechanismsThird both because it allows low-cost learning-at-a-distance and becauseit tracks local ecological circumstances socially-transmitted informationconstitutes a valuable resource for both the student of predators and thestudent of fire Just as members of a local group act as a reservoir ofaccumulated observations regarding the identifying attributes and char-acteristic behaviors of indigenous animals so too can othersrsquo knowledgeof the fire-relevant properties of locally-available materials be expectedto play a valuable role in learning to use fire in a given ecosystemFourth the information acquisition system can be expected to employbiases or prior structures that guide learning in the specified domainFor example Barrett suggests that childrenrsquos learning about animals maybe guided by such fundamental categorical distinctions as dangerous ver-sus harmless carnivore versus herbivore and so on Correspondingly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 433
434 DANIEL M T FESSLER
learning about fire may be structured by dichotomies such as flammableversus nonflammable or more broadly things that intensify fires andthings that diminish fires Lastly acquisition of procedural knowledgemay be achieved in part through the operation of dedicated mechanismsthat serve to generate relevant experience in a safe context Just as chaseplay an intrinsically rewarding activity for children may serve to honepredator-prey pursuit and evasion skills (Steen amp Owens 2001) so toomay childrenrsquos manipulations of small fires embers and the like pro-vide a means of acquiring relevant experience in a setting that is saferthan a full-scale cooking or heating fire
Existing literature Childrenrsquos fire play and fire setting inmodern societies
Testing the five sets of predictions described above will require struc-tured experiments involving young children from diverse cultures Becausesuch an enterprise is not entered into lightly it is worth exploring herethe extent to which available findings are congruent with the portrait ofhuman fire psychology outlined above A voluminous literature addressesthe topic of fire setting by children and juveniles Importantly fire set-ting is a broad category of behavior encompassing everything from play-ing with matches to arson The perspective developed here suggests thatfor the child observation of and interaction with fire will often be endsin themselves a motivational orientation that differs markedly from thatwhich pertains when fire is used as a weapon to intentionally inflict dam-age or harm Consistent with this distinction public safety experts dis-tinguish so-called lsquofire playrsquo from other behaviors involving fire definingfire play as ldquoA fire deliberately set for no purpose constructive or destruc-tive beyond the fire itselfrdquo (Hall 20031) This distinction however inno way suggests that fire play is harmless ndash on the contrary fire safetyofficersrsquo concern with fire play is quite justified By way of example inthe US between 1980 and 1999 childrenrsquos fire play resulted in 7306civilian deaths 48922 serious civilian injuries and over 3 billion dol-larsrsquo worth of property damage (Hall 2003) Although governmentalattempts to combat the problem through consumer product safety reg-ulations public information campaigns education plans and interven-
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 434
A BURNING DESIRE 435
tion programs have succeeded in reducing these figures somewhat chil-drenrsquos fire play continues to be a significant source of pain sufferingand expense in modern societies
Much of the literature on fire setting is aimed at characterizing thefeatures of recidivist juvenile fire setters with investigators identifyingattributes and correlates such as cruelty to animals defiance of author-ity and a chaotic or conflictual family environment as risk factors forrecidivism (Kolko 2002) While such research usefully identifies dan-gerous individuals who are relatively resistent to the mechanisms of socialcontrol normally employed to enhance conformity to social standardsthis entreprise generally overshadows the exploration of fire setting amongnon-clinical non-recidivist children Nevertheless despite this bias it ispossible to glean a portrait of such behavior from the existing literature
Kafry (1980) queried 99 lower elementary school boys in BerkeleyCalifornia finding that 45 reported having played with fire and 21reported having caused a fire as a consequence of the latter 18 werecaused by children who were two years of age or younger at the timeof the accident Eighty-one percent of children surveyed reported beinginterested in fire and across ages curiosity was the motive cited mostfrequently to explain the behavior As a comparison group for a clini-cal sample Kolko et al (2001) conducted a three-year longitudinal studyof a community sample of 100 boys and 62 girls age 6-13 (mean =95) with follow-up interviews at one and two years Results reveal quiteconsistent patterns wherein at any one time approximately one-third ofthe children report being interested in fire slightly less than half reportplaying with matches and slightly less than one-third report having setplay fires Viewed individually by the end of the study almost three-quarters of the participants had at some time played with matches orset a play fire Perrin-Wallqvist and Norlander (2003) retrospectively sur-veyed 50 18-year old Swedish men and 45 18-19 year old Swedishwomen Seventy percent of the men reported having played with fireduring childhood and 44 of the women did likewise The principalmotives for childhood fire play were curiosity entertainment and excite-ment seeking a high proportion of subjects reported being fascinated ordrawn to fire Paralleling this result Perrin-Wallqvist et al (Perrin-Wallqvist Archer amp Norlander 2004) surveyed 28 male and 28 female
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 435
436 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Swedish 16-year olds concerning emotional attitudes toward fire While61 thought fire was ldquocozyrdquo and 20 found fire ldquoexcitingrdquo only 9thought that fire was ldquouninterestingrdquo 27 of the respondents found firesufficiently entertaining that they lit fires when bored
Simonsen and Bullis (2001) surveyed 5416 third through eighth gradeOregonian students relatively evenly distributed across ages regardingfire starting interest in fire and motivations for fire play Forty-sevenpercent of students reported having played with fire a retrospective ques-tion revealed that 10 reported starting their first fire between the agesof one and five 27 reported starting their first fire between the agesof six and ten and 10 reported starting their first fire between theages of 11 and 15 Attraction to and interest in fire was quite highalthough only 29 overtly reported being interested in fire 46 reportedliking television programs that involve fire 61 reported enjoying assist-ing adults in lighting or putting out fire 33 reported enjoying burn-ing objects such as twigs grass or paper and 21 reported enjoyingplaying with matches or lighters Correspondingly fire had high enter-tainment value for children with large proportions of respondents cit-ing as motives for fire starting ldquojust for funrdquo (23) and ldquoout of boredomrdquo(19) with curiousity (ldquoto see what would happenrdquo) another significantcontributor (18)
Cotterall (2003) conducted a similar survey of 3031 students fromgrade 3 through 13 in Sudbury Ontario A number of patterns aremarkedly evident First while the frequency of actual fire play shows asteady increase across the age span studied (18 of third graders reporthaving played with matches or lighters in the last year while 81 ofthirteenth graders report having done so) what Cotterall terms lsquoexpressedpreoccupation and fascination with firersquo (eg ldquoAre you curious aboutfirerdquo ldquoAre you really interested in fire and what it can dordquo etc) doesnot vary in any regular fashion across this age range and likewise thelower-level factor that Cotterall terms lsquoexpressed interest in firersquo (egldquoDo you like to start firesrdquo ldquoDo you feel excited when you watch afire burningrdquo ldquoDo you like staring at firerdquo etc) shows only a gradualincrease with age These patterns suggest that the age-related changesin fire play documented by Cotterall are a function not of changes inattraction to fire but rather of changes in willingness to disobey ruleschanges in opportunities to engage in proscribed behavior outside of
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 436
A BURNING DESIRE 437
adult supervision and changes in access to sources of ignition Tellinglyacross ages the principal motives for fire starting are ldquojust for funrdquo ldquotosee what would happenrdquo ldquoto destroy somethingrdquo and ldquoboredomrdquo pat-terns that are even more marked among those who reported extensivefire play Equally important knowledge regarding institutionally-conveyedfire safety practices had virtually no relationship with the extent of fireplay
An indirect measure of childrenrsquos fire-related activity can be derivedfrom records of fires that whether by design or accident becomesufficiently large as to attract the attention of fire departments Okulitchand Pinsonneault (2002) compiled records of 4600 fires involving juve-niles in Oregon between 1996 and 2000 Twelve-year olds accountedfor the largest proportion of these fires with a steady increase in involve-ment from ages 1 to 12 and a steady decrease in involvement after age12 If we assume that in at least some sizable fraction of these firesthe fire starter had no intention of creating a conflagration sufficientlylarge as to result in the involvement of the authorities (cf Kafry 1980)then comparing this pattern to Cotterallrsquos findings suggests that in NorthAmerica age 12 constitutes the dangerous apex of the combination offactors listed above (willingness to disobey rules etc) and incompletemastery of fire such that it escapes the fire starterrsquos control
Lastly although not presented in the context of quantitative datadrawing on her experience with firesetters in Massachusetts Pinsonneaultconcludes that ldquo[c]ommon questions children have about fire includelsquoWhat makes fire hot How does a small fire grow Why are somefires very smoky Can everything burn How can you keep a firesmall How can you put fires outrdquo (Pinsonneault 2002223) Importantlythese are exactly the sort of questions that we might expect to be fore-most in the minds of individuals whose curiousity is not simply the prod-uct of a general interest in the world but rather reflects a domain-specificinformation-gathering system the purpose of which is to acquire the abil-ity to control fire
Although the studies reviewed above vary considerably in their detailsthey can be roughly summarized as follows a) western children firstbecome curious about fire in early childhood b) experimentation withfire increases as a function of age often extending well into adolescenceand c) for many individuals some attraction to fire persists into maturity
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 437
438 DANIEL M T FESSLER
a pattern consistent with the entertainment value that many westernadults place on activities such as gazing into a fire The question remainshowever as to whether this trajectory directly reflects the workings of adevelopmental information acquisition system governed by an evolvedpsychological mechanism In particular it is telling that much fire playoccurs in adolescence in western populations First as was arguably truein most ancestral human societies in many small-scale societies todayadolescents particularly females engage in a great deal of productiveunsupervised economic activity (cf Kaplan Hill Lancaster amp Hurtado2000) Given that fire is an elementary part of the human tool kit itwould be odd if the acquisition of fire-control skills was normally soretarded that additional experimentation was still required during thesame phase of life when significant economic productivity has alreadycommenced Second a hallmark of adolescence in western nations is asubstantial increase in mobility and autonomy changes that often pre-cipitate engagement in proscribed activities that had previously been pre-cluded by caretaker supervision Combined with strong prohibitionsagainst fire play and for many limited exposure to fire on a daily basisthis pattern means that in much of the developed world adolescenceoften constitutes the first opportunity to extensively experiment with fireTogether these observations suggest that while studies of fire play inthe West are interesting in as much as they reveal considerable moti-vation to explore fire from a young age they nevertheless present whatis likely a highly distorted portrait of the developmental unfolding of amechanism aimed at acquiring fire knowledge and skills
Childrenrsquos interactions with fire in societies in which fire isroutinely used as a tool
Children and fire in Bengkulu Sumatra
Between 1990 and 1993 I conducted ethnographic fieldwork in a semi-traditional Bengkulu Malay fishing village on the west coast of SumatraAlthough I did not systematically collect data on childrenrsquos interactionswith fire my immersion in village life was such that I neverthelessrecorded many offhand observations and impressions allowing for asketch of childrenrsquos interactions with fire
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 438
A BURNING DESIRE 439
Because childcare duties and cooking duties were often delegated tothe same individuals from infancy on children in Bengkulu had ampleopportunity to observe others controlling fire Small children often saton or near their caretakers while the latter manipulated fire caretakersbrushed the child aside with a scolding if the child reached for burningor hot items but otherwise offered no instruction regarding the controlof fire Childrenrsquos autonomous manipulation of fire typically began aroundage 4 About this time children were allowed to build small fires andfrequently did cooking either mud pies and other pretend foods or actualmorsels Adults did not instruct children with regard to either buildingor maintaining a fire at most snapping at a child if play with or nearfire posed a danger the only input that might be considered pedagog-ical came from slightly older children who would sometimes narratetheir actions using a type of play-speech while handling fire Childrenrsquosinterest in such ldquokidrsquos firesrdquo seemed to peak around age 6-7 and dimin-ished rapidly thereafter disappearing entirely before age 10 Childrenages 3-6 sometimes poked at jumped over and similarly toyed withadult fires (resulting in one serious burn during my stay) but this waslimited in scope and frequency and again had largely subsided by mid-dle childhood Children age 6 and up were often sent to a neighborrsquoshouse to fetch burning embers for fire-starting By age 8 both girls andboys were commonly performing adult chores including cooking andtending fires and their interactions with fire were increasingly utilitar-ian in nature Adolescents and young adults (particularly men nearly allof whom smoked) would occasionally idlely flick cigarrette lighters toywith matches or poke at burning candles but such behavior was moreakin to fiddling than to interested experimentation and was not char-acterized by any excitement The only behavior that I observed thatcould even remotely be classified as fascination with fire occurred whena fad for making cap bombs swept the village boys age 5-8 would mod-ify old spark plugs to form the body of the bomb scrape match headsto obtain gunpowder then load the projectiles and throw them upwardsqueeling with glee when they produced a resounding Bang upon impactwith the ground
To summarize my (admittedly unsystematic) ethnographic observa-tions in one Bengkulu village children experienced early interaction withfire but received little or no instruction in controlling it Typically children
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 439
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
A BURNING DESIRE 433
that requires attack or injury to learn that an animal is dangerous isunlikely to survive for longrdquo (2005217) Correspondingly if childrenwere to acquire their knowledge of fire exclusively through individualtrial-and-error learning a large percentage would suffer serious or fatalburns
Barrett (2005) outlines five features that can be expected to charac-terize the information acquisition system dedicated to learning aboutpredators we can expect parallels to exist for each of these features inthe domain of controlling fire First learning can be expected to occurwithout extrinsic motivation Just as dangerous animals appear to holdconsiderable fascination for children so too can children be expected tobe spontaneously interested in fire ndash children are predicted to be curi-ous about the flammability of various materials and interested in theconsequences of manipulating or rearranging burning objects addingobjects to or removing objects from a fire and so on Second we canexpect information to be acquired rapidly often on the basis of only asingle exposure To acquire a new animal concept children are expectedto need only a single encounter or to hear only once about the attrib-utes of a dangerous animal Likewise fire learning should be rapid inresponse to minimal exposure ndash information relevant to the control offire is predicted to have high salience such that children will attend tothis information and recall a greater percentage of it following exposurethan will be the case with respect to information relevant to otherdomains that is acquired through general-purpose learning mechanismsThird both because it allows low-cost learning-at-a-distance and becauseit tracks local ecological circumstances socially-transmitted informationconstitutes a valuable resource for both the student of predators and thestudent of fire Just as members of a local group act as a reservoir ofaccumulated observations regarding the identifying attributes and char-acteristic behaviors of indigenous animals so too can othersrsquo knowledgeof the fire-relevant properties of locally-available materials be expectedto play a valuable role in learning to use fire in a given ecosystemFourth the information acquisition system can be expected to employbiases or prior structures that guide learning in the specified domainFor example Barrett suggests that childrenrsquos learning about animals maybe guided by such fundamental categorical distinctions as dangerous ver-sus harmless carnivore versus herbivore and so on Correspondingly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 433
434 DANIEL M T FESSLER
learning about fire may be structured by dichotomies such as flammableversus nonflammable or more broadly things that intensify fires andthings that diminish fires Lastly acquisition of procedural knowledgemay be achieved in part through the operation of dedicated mechanismsthat serve to generate relevant experience in a safe context Just as chaseplay an intrinsically rewarding activity for children may serve to honepredator-prey pursuit and evasion skills (Steen amp Owens 2001) so toomay childrenrsquos manipulations of small fires embers and the like pro-vide a means of acquiring relevant experience in a setting that is saferthan a full-scale cooking or heating fire
Existing literature Childrenrsquos fire play and fire setting inmodern societies
Testing the five sets of predictions described above will require struc-tured experiments involving young children from diverse cultures Becausesuch an enterprise is not entered into lightly it is worth exploring herethe extent to which available findings are congruent with the portrait ofhuman fire psychology outlined above A voluminous literature addressesthe topic of fire setting by children and juveniles Importantly fire set-ting is a broad category of behavior encompassing everything from play-ing with matches to arson The perspective developed here suggests thatfor the child observation of and interaction with fire will often be endsin themselves a motivational orientation that differs markedly from thatwhich pertains when fire is used as a weapon to intentionally inflict dam-age or harm Consistent with this distinction public safety experts dis-tinguish so-called lsquofire playrsquo from other behaviors involving fire definingfire play as ldquoA fire deliberately set for no purpose constructive or destruc-tive beyond the fire itselfrdquo (Hall 20031) This distinction however inno way suggests that fire play is harmless ndash on the contrary fire safetyofficersrsquo concern with fire play is quite justified By way of example inthe US between 1980 and 1999 childrenrsquos fire play resulted in 7306civilian deaths 48922 serious civilian injuries and over 3 billion dol-larsrsquo worth of property damage (Hall 2003) Although governmentalattempts to combat the problem through consumer product safety reg-ulations public information campaigns education plans and interven-
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 434
A BURNING DESIRE 435
tion programs have succeeded in reducing these figures somewhat chil-drenrsquos fire play continues to be a significant source of pain sufferingand expense in modern societies
Much of the literature on fire setting is aimed at characterizing thefeatures of recidivist juvenile fire setters with investigators identifyingattributes and correlates such as cruelty to animals defiance of author-ity and a chaotic or conflictual family environment as risk factors forrecidivism (Kolko 2002) While such research usefully identifies dan-gerous individuals who are relatively resistent to the mechanisms of socialcontrol normally employed to enhance conformity to social standardsthis entreprise generally overshadows the exploration of fire setting amongnon-clinical non-recidivist children Nevertheless despite this bias it ispossible to glean a portrait of such behavior from the existing literature
Kafry (1980) queried 99 lower elementary school boys in BerkeleyCalifornia finding that 45 reported having played with fire and 21reported having caused a fire as a consequence of the latter 18 werecaused by children who were two years of age or younger at the timeof the accident Eighty-one percent of children surveyed reported beinginterested in fire and across ages curiosity was the motive cited mostfrequently to explain the behavior As a comparison group for a clini-cal sample Kolko et al (2001) conducted a three-year longitudinal studyof a community sample of 100 boys and 62 girls age 6-13 (mean =95) with follow-up interviews at one and two years Results reveal quiteconsistent patterns wherein at any one time approximately one-third ofthe children report being interested in fire slightly less than half reportplaying with matches and slightly less than one-third report having setplay fires Viewed individually by the end of the study almost three-quarters of the participants had at some time played with matches orset a play fire Perrin-Wallqvist and Norlander (2003) retrospectively sur-veyed 50 18-year old Swedish men and 45 18-19 year old Swedishwomen Seventy percent of the men reported having played with fireduring childhood and 44 of the women did likewise The principalmotives for childhood fire play were curiosity entertainment and excite-ment seeking a high proportion of subjects reported being fascinated ordrawn to fire Paralleling this result Perrin-Wallqvist et al (Perrin-Wallqvist Archer amp Norlander 2004) surveyed 28 male and 28 female
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 435
436 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Swedish 16-year olds concerning emotional attitudes toward fire While61 thought fire was ldquocozyrdquo and 20 found fire ldquoexcitingrdquo only 9thought that fire was ldquouninterestingrdquo 27 of the respondents found firesufficiently entertaining that they lit fires when bored
Simonsen and Bullis (2001) surveyed 5416 third through eighth gradeOregonian students relatively evenly distributed across ages regardingfire starting interest in fire and motivations for fire play Forty-sevenpercent of students reported having played with fire a retrospective ques-tion revealed that 10 reported starting their first fire between the agesof one and five 27 reported starting their first fire between the agesof six and ten and 10 reported starting their first fire between theages of 11 and 15 Attraction to and interest in fire was quite highalthough only 29 overtly reported being interested in fire 46 reportedliking television programs that involve fire 61 reported enjoying assist-ing adults in lighting or putting out fire 33 reported enjoying burn-ing objects such as twigs grass or paper and 21 reported enjoyingplaying with matches or lighters Correspondingly fire had high enter-tainment value for children with large proportions of respondents cit-ing as motives for fire starting ldquojust for funrdquo (23) and ldquoout of boredomrdquo(19) with curiousity (ldquoto see what would happenrdquo) another significantcontributor (18)
Cotterall (2003) conducted a similar survey of 3031 students fromgrade 3 through 13 in Sudbury Ontario A number of patterns aremarkedly evident First while the frequency of actual fire play shows asteady increase across the age span studied (18 of third graders reporthaving played with matches or lighters in the last year while 81 ofthirteenth graders report having done so) what Cotterall terms lsquoexpressedpreoccupation and fascination with firersquo (eg ldquoAre you curious aboutfirerdquo ldquoAre you really interested in fire and what it can dordquo etc) doesnot vary in any regular fashion across this age range and likewise thelower-level factor that Cotterall terms lsquoexpressed interest in firersquo (egldquoDo you like to start firesrdquo ldquoDo you feel excited when you watch afire burningrdquo ldquoDo you like staring at firerdquo etc) shows only a gradualincrease with age These patterns suggest that the age-related changesin fire play documented by Cotterall are a function not of changes inattraction to fire but rather of changes in willingness to disobey ruleschanges in opportunities to engage in proscribed behavior outside of
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 436
A BURNING DESIRE 437
adult supervision and changes in access to sources of ignition Tellinglyacross ages the principal motives for fire starting are ldquojust for funrdquo ldquotosee what would happenrdquo ldquoto destroy somethingrdquo and ldquoboredomrdquo pat-terns that are even more marked among those who reported extensivefire play Equally important knowledge regarding institutionally-conveyedfire safety practices had virtually no relationship with the extent of fireplay
An indirect measure of childrenrsquos fire-related activity can be derivedfrom records of fires that whether by design or accident becomesufficiently large as to attract the attention of fire departments Okulitchand Pinsonneault (2002) compiled records of 4600 fires involving juve-niles in Oregon between 1996 and 2000 Twelve-year olds accountedfor the largest proportion of these fires with a steady increase in involve-ment from ages 1 to 12 and a steady decrease in involvement after age12 If we assume that in at least some sizable fraction of these firesthe fire starter had no intention of creating a conflagration sufficientlylarge as to result in the involvement of the authorities (cf Kafry 1980)then comparing this pattern to Cotterallrsquos findings suggests that in NorthAmerica age 12 constitutes the dangerous apex of the combination offactors listed above (willingness to disobey rules etc) and incompletemastery of fire such that it escapes the fire starterrsquos control
Lastly although not presented in the context of quantitative datadrawing on her experience with firesetters in Massachusetts Pinsonneaultconcludes that ldquo[c]ommon questions children have about fire includelsquoWhat makes fire hot How does a small fire grow Why are somefires very smoky Can everything burn How can you keep a firesmall How can you put fires outrdquo (Pinsonneault 2002223) Importantlythese are exactly the sort of questions that we might expect to be fore-most in the minds of individuals whose curiousity is not simply the prod-uct of a general interest in the world but rather reflects a domain-specificinformation-gathering system the purpose of which is to acquire the abil-ity to control fire
Although the studies reviewed above vary considerably in their detailsthey can be roughly summarized as follows a) western children firstbecome curious about fire in early childhood b) experimentation withfire increases as a function of age often extending well into adolescenceand c) for many individuals some attraction to fire persists into maturity
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 437
438 DANIEL M T FESSLER
a pattern consistent with the entertainment value that many westernadults place on activities such as gazing into a fire The question remainshowever as to whether this trajectory directly reflects the workings of adevelopmental information acquisition system governed by an evolvedpsychological mechanism In particular it is telling that much fire playoccurs in adolescence in western populations First as was arguably truein most ancestral human societies in many small-scale societies todayadolescents particularly females engage in a great deal of productiveunsupervised economic activity (cf Kaplan Hill Lancaster amp Hurtado2000) Given that fire is an elementary part of the human tool kit itwould be odd if the acquisition of fire-control skills was normally soretarded that additional experimentation was still required during thesame phase of life when significant economic productivity has alreadycommenced Second a hallmark of adolescence in western nations is asubstantial increase in mobility and autonomy changes that often pre-cipitate engagement in proscribed activities that had previously been pre-cluded by caretaker supervision Combined with strong prohibitionsagainst fire play and for many limited exposure to fire on a daily basisthis pattern means that in much of the developed world adolescenceoften constitutes the first opportunity to extensively experiment with fireTogether these observations suggest that while studies of fire play inthe West are interesting in as much as they reveal considerable moti-vation to explore fire from a young age they nevertheless present whatis likely a highly distorted portrait of the developmental unfolding of amechanism aimed at acquiring fire knowledge and skills
Childrenrsquos interactions with fire in societies in which fire isroutinely used as a tool
Children and fire in Bengkulu Sumatra
Between 1990 and 1993 I conducted ethnographic fieldwork in a semi-traditional Bengkulu Malay fishing village on the west coast of SumatraAlthough I did not systematically collect data on childrenrsquos interactionswith fire my immersion in village life was such that I neverthelessrecorded many offhand observations and impressions allowing for asketch of childrenrsquos interactions with fire
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 438
A BURNING DESIRE 439
Because childcare duties and cooking duties were often delegated tothe same individuals from infancy on children in Bengkulu had ampleopportunity to observe others controlling fire Small children often saton or near their caretakers while the latter manipulated fire caretakersbrushed the child aside with a scolding if the child reached for burningor hot items but otherwise offered no instruction regarding the controlof fire Childrenrsquos autonomous manipulation of fire typically began aroundage 4 About this time children were allowed to build small fires andfrequently did cooking either mud pies and other pretend foods or actualmorsels Adults did not instruct children with regard to either buildingor maintaining a fire at most snapping at a child if play with or nearfire posed a danger the only input that might be considered pedagog-ical came from slightly older children who would sometimes narratetheir actions using a type of play-speech while handling fire Childrenrsquosinterest in such ldquokidrsquos firesrdquo seemed to peak around age 6-7 and dimin-ished rapidly thereafter disappearing entirely before age 10 Childrenages 3-6 sometimes poked at jumped over and similarly toyed withadult fires (resulting in one serious burn during my stay) but this waslimited in scope and frequency and again had largely subsided by mid-dle childhood Children age 6 and up were often sent to a neighborrsquoshouse to fetch burning embers for fire-starting By age 8 both girls andboys were commonly performing adult chores including cooking andtending fires and their interactions with fire were increasingly utilitar-ian in nature Adolescents and young adults (particularly men nearly allof whom smoked) would occasionally idlely flick cigarrette lighters toywith matches or poke at burning candles but such behavior was moreakin to fiddling than to interested experimentation and was not char-acterized by any excitement The only behavior that I observed thatcould even remotely be classified as fascination with fire occurred whena fad for making cap bombs swept the village boys age 5-8 would mod-ify old spark plugs to form the body of the bomb scrape match headsto obtain gunpowder then load the projectiles and throw them upwardsqueeling with glee when they produced a resounding Bang upon impactwith the ground
To summarize my (admittedly unsystematic) ethnographic observa-tions in one Bengkulu village children experienced early interaction withfire but received little or no instruction in controlling it Typically children
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 439
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
434 DANIEL M T FESSLER
learning about fire may be structured by dichotomies such as flammableversus nonflammable or more broadly things that intensify fires andthings that diminish fires Lastly acquisition of procedural knowledgemay be achieved in part through the operation of dedicated mechanismsthat serve to generate relevant experience in a safe context Just as chaseplay an intrinsically rewarding activity for children may serve to honepredator-prey pursuit and evasion skills (Steen amp Owens 2001) so toomay childrenrsquos manipulations of small fires embers and the like pro-vide a means of acquiring relevant experience in a setting that is saferthan a full-scale cooking or heating fire
Existing literature Childrenrsquos fire play and fire setting inmodern societies
Testing the five sets of predictions described above will require struc-tured experiments involving young children from diverse cultures Becausesuch an enterprise is not entered into lightly it is worth exploring herethe extent to which available findings are congruent with the portrait ofhuman fire psychology outlined above A voluminous literature addressesthe topic of fire setting by children and juveniles Importantly fire set-ting is a broad category of behavior encompassing everything from play-ing with matches to arson The perspective developed here suggests thatfor the child observation of and interaction with fire will often be endsin themselves a motivational orientation that differs markedly from thatwhich pertains when fire is used as a weapon to intentionally inflict dam-age or harm Consistent with this distinction public safety experts dis-tinguish so-called lsquofire playrsquo from other behaviors involving fire definingfire play as ldquoA fire deliberately set for no purpose constructive or destruc-tive beyond the fire itselfrdquo (Hall 20031) This distinction however inno way suggests that fire play is harmless ndash on the contrary fire safetyofficersrsquo concern with fire play is quite justified By way of example inthe US between 1980 and 1999 childrenrsquos fire play resulted in 7306civilian deaths 48922 serious civilian injuries and over 3 billion dol-larsrsquo worth of property damage (Hall 2003) Although governmentalattempts to combat the problem through consumer product safety reg-ulations public information campaigns education plans and interven-
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 434
A BURNING DESIRE 435
tion programs have succeeded in reducing these figures somewhat chil-drenrsquos fire play continues to be a significant source of pain sufferingand expense in modern societies
Much of the literature on fire setting is aimed at characterizing thefeatures of recidivist juvenile fire setters with investigators identifyingattributes and correlates such as cruelty to animals defiance of author-ity and a chaotic or conflictual family environment as risk factors forrecidivism (Kolko 2002) While such research usefully identifies dan-gerous individuals who are relatively resistent to the mechanisms of socialcontrol normally employed to enhance conformity to social standardsthis entreprise generally overshadows the exploration of fire setting amongnon-clinical non-recidivist children Nevertheless despite this bias it ispossible to glean a portrait of such behavior from the existing literature
Kafry (1980) queried 99 lower elementary school boys in BerkeleyCalifornia finding that 45 reported having played with fire and 21reported having caused a fire as a consequence of the latter 18 werecaused by children who were two years of age or younger at the timeof the accident Eighty-one percent of children surveyed reported beinginterested in fire and across ages curiosity was the motive cited mostfrequently to explain the behavior As a comparison group for a clini-cal sample Kolko et al (2001) conducted a three-year longitudinal studyof a community sample of 100 boys and 62 girls age 6-13 (mean =95) with follow-up interviews at one and two years Results reveal quiteconsistent patterns wherein at any one time approximately one-third ofthe children report being interested in fire slightly less than half reportplaying with matches and slightly less than one-third report having setplay fires Viewed individually by the end of the study almost three-quarters of the participants had at some time played with matches orset a play fire Perrin-Wallqvist and Norlander (2003) retrospectively sur-veyed 50 18-year old Swedish men and 45 18-19 year old Swedishwomen Seventy percent of the men reported having played with fireduring childhood and 44 of the women did likewise The principalmotives for childhood fire play were curiosity entertainment and excite-ment seeking a high proportion of subjects reported being fascinated ordrawn to fire Paralleling this result Perrin-Wallqvist et al (Perrin-Wallqvist Archer amp Norlander 2004) surveyed 28 male and 28 female
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 435
436 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Swedish 16-year olds concerning emotional attitudes toward fire While61 thought fire was ldquocozyrdquo and 20 found fire ldquoexcitingrdquo only 9thought that fire was ldquouninterestingrdquo 27 of the respondents found firesufficiently entertaining that they lit fires when bored
Simonsen and Bullis (2001) surveyed 5416 third through eighth gradeOregonian students relatively evenly distributed across ages regardingfire starting interest in fire and motivations for fire play Forty-sevenpercent of students reported having played with fire a retrospective ques-tion revealed that 10 reported starting their first fire between the agesof one and five 27 reported starting their first fire between the agesof six and ten and 10 reported starting their first fire between theages of 11 and 15 Attraction to and interest in fire was quite highalthough only 29 overtly reported being interested in fire 46 reportedliking television programs that involve fire 61 reported enjoying assist-ing adults in lighting or putting out fire 33 reported enjoying burn-ing objects such as twigs grass or paper and 21 reported enjoyingplaying with matches or lighters Correspondingly fire had high enter-tainment value for children with large proportions of respondents cit-ing as motives for fire starting ldquojust for funrdquo (23) and ldquoout of boredomrdquo(19) with curiousity (ldquoto see what would happenrdquo) another significantcontributor (18)
Cotterall (2003) conducted a similar survey of 3031 students fromgrade 3 through 13 in Sudbury Ontario A number of patterns aremarkedly evident First while the frequency of actual fire play shows asteady increase across the age span studied (18 of third graders reporthaving played with matches or lighters in the last year while 81 ofthirteenth graders report having done so) what Cotterall terms lsquoexpressedpreoccupation and fascination with firersquo (eg ldquoAre you curious aboutfirerdquo ldquoAre you really interested in fire and what it can dordquo etc) doesnot vary in any regular fashion across this age range and likewise thelower-level factor that Cotterall terms lsquoexpressed interest in firersquo (egldquoDo you like to start firesrdquo ldquoDo you feel excited when you watch afire burningrdquo ldquoDo you like staring at firerdquo etc) shows only a gradualincrease with age These patterns suggest that the age-related changesin fire play documented by Cotterall are a function not of changes inattraction to fire but rather of changes in willingness to disobey ruleschanges in opportunities to engage in proscribed behavior outside of
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 436
A BURNING DESIRE 437
adult supervision and changes in access to sources of ignition Tellinglyacross ages the principal motives for fire starting are ldquojust for funrdquo ldquotosee what would happenrdquo ldquoto destroy somethingrdquo and ldquoboredomrdquo pat-terns that are even more marked among those who reported extensivefire play Equally important knowledge regarding institutionally-conveyedfire safety practices had virtually no relationship with the extent of fireplay
An indirect measure of childrenrsquos fire-related activity can be derivedfrom records of fires that whether by design or accident becomesufficiently large as to attract the attention of fire departments Okulitchand Pinsonneault (2002) compiled records of 4600 fires involving juve-niles in Oregon between 1996 and 2000 Twelve-year olds accountedfor the largest proportion of these fires with a steady increase in involve-ment from ages 1 to 12 and a steady decrease in involvement after age12 If we assume that in at least some sizable fraction of these firesthe fire starter had no intention of creating a conflagration sufficientlylarge as to result in the involvement of the authorities (cf Kafry 1980)then comparing this pattern to Cotterallrsquos findings suggests that in NorthAmerica age 12 constitutes the dangerous apex of the combination offactors listed above (willingness to disobey rules etc) and incompletemastery of fire such that it escapes the fire starterrsquos control
Lastly although not presented in the context of quantitative datadrawing on her experience with firesetters in Massachusetts Pinsonneaultconcludes that ldquo[c]ommon questions children have about fire includelsquoWhat makes fire hot How does a small fire grow Why are somefires very smoky Can everything burn How can you keep a firesmall How can you put fires outrdquo (Pinsonneault 2002223) Importantlythese are exactly the sort of questions that we might expect to be fore-most in the minds of individuals whose curiousity is not simply the prod-uct of a general interest in the world but rather reflects a domain-specificinformation-gathering system the purpose of which is to acquire the abil-ity to control fire
Although the studies reviewed above vary considerably in their detailsthey can be roughly summarized as follows a) western children firstbecome curious about fire in early childhood b) experimentation withfire increases as a function of age often extending well into adolescenceand c) for many individuals some attraction to fire persists into maturity
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 437
438 DANIEL M T FESSLER
a pattern consistent with the entertainment value that many westernadults place on activities such as gazing into a fire The question remainshowever as to whether this trajectory directly reflects the workings of adevelopmental information acquisition system governed by an evolvedpsychological mechanism In particular it is telling that much fire playoccurs in adolescence in western populations First as was arguably truein most ancestral human societies in many small-scale societies todayadolescents particularly females engage in a great deal of productiveunsupervised economic activity (cf Kaplan Hill Lancaster amp Hurtado2000) Given that fire is an elementary part of the human tool kit itwould be odd if the acquisition of fire-control skills was normally soretarded that additional experimentation was still required during thesame phase of life when significant economic productivity has alreadycommenced Second a hallmark of adolescence in western nations is asubstantial increase in mobility and autonomy changes that often pre-cipitate engagement in proscribed activities that had previously been pre-cluded by caretaker supervision Combined with strong prohibitionsagainst fire play and for many limited exposure to fire on a daily basisthis pattern means that in much of the developed world adolescenceoften constitutes the first opportunity to extensively experiment with fireTogether these observations suggest that while studies of fire play inthe West are interesting in as much as they reveal considerable moti-vation to explore fire from a young age they nevertheless present whatis likely a highly distorted portrait of the developmental unfolding of amechanism aimed at acquiring fire knowledge and skills
Childrenrsquos interactions with fire in societies in which fire isroutinely used as a tool
Children and fire in Bengkulu Sumatra
Between 1990 and 1993 I conducted ethnographic fieldwork in a semi-traditional Bengkulu Malay fishing village on the west coast of SumatraAlthough I did not systematically collect data on childrenrsquos interactionswith fire my immersion in village life was such that I neverthelessrecorded many offhand observations and impressions allowing for asketch of childrenrsquos interactions with fire
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 438
A BURNING DESIRE 439
Because childcare duties and cooking duties were often delegated tothe same individuals from infancy on children in Bengkulu had ampleopportunity to observe others controlling fire Small children often saton or near their caretakers while the latter manipulated fire caretakersbrushed the child aside with a scolding if the child reached for burningor hot items but otherwise offered no instruction regarding the controlof fire Childrenrsquos autonomous manipulation of fire typically began aroundage 4 About this time children were allowed to build small fires andfrequently did cooking either mud pies and other pretend foods or actualmorsels Adults did not instruct children with regard to either buildingor maintaining a fire at most snapping at a child if play with or nearfire posed a danger the only input that might be considered pedagog-ical came from slightly older children who would sometimes narratetheir actions using a type of play-speech while handling fire Childrenrsquosinterest in such ldquokidrsquos firesrdquo seemed to peak around age 6-7 and dimin-ished rapidly thereafter disappearing entirely before age 10 Childrenages 3-6 sometimes poked at jumped over and similarly toyed withadult fires (resulting in one serious burn during my stay) but this waslimited in scope and frequency and again had largely subsided by mid-dle childhood Children age 6 and up were often sent to a neighborrsquoshouse to fetch burning embers for fire-starting By age 8 both girls andboys were commonly performing adult chores including cooking andtending fires and their interactions with fire were increasingly utilitar-ian in nature Adolescents and young adults (particularly men nearly allof whom smoked) would occasionally idlely flick cigarrette lighters toywith matches or poke at burning candles but such behavior was moreakin to fiddling than to interested experimentation and was not char-acterized by any excitement The only behavior that I observed thatcould even remotely be classified as fascination with fire occurred whena fad for making cap bombs swept the village boys age 5-8 would mod-ify old spark plugs to form the body of the bomb scrape match headsto obtain gunpowder then load the projectiles and throw them upwardsqueeling with glee when they produced a resounding Bang upon impactwith the ground
To summarize my (admittedly unsystematic) ethnographic observa-tions in one Bengkulu village children experienced early interaction withfire but received little or no instruction in controlling it Typically children
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 439
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
A BURNING DESIRE 435
tion programs have succeeded in reducing these figures somewhat chil-drenrsquos fire play continues to be a significant source of pain sufferingand expense in modern societies
Much of the literature on fire setting is aimed at characterizing thefeatures of recidivist juvenile fire setters with investigators identifyingattributes and correlates such as cruelty to animals defiance of author-ity and a chaotic or conflictual family environment as risk factors forrecidivism (Kolko 2002) While such research usefully identifies dan-gerous individuals who are relatively resistent to the mechanisms of socialcontrol normally employed to enhance conformity to social standardsthis entreprise generally overshadows the exploration of fire setting amongnon-clinical non-recidivist children Nevertheless despite this bias it ispossible to glean a portrait of such behavior from the existing literature
Kafry (1980) queried 99 lower elementary school boys in BerkeleyCalifornia finding that 45 reported having played with fire and 21reported having caused a fire as a consequence of the latter 18 werecaused by children who were two years of age or younger at the timeof the accident Eighty-one percent of children surveyed reported beinginterested in fire and across ages curiosity was the motive cited mostfrequently to explain the behavior As a comparison group for a clini-cal sample Kolko et al (2001) conducted a three-year longitudinal studyof a community sample of 100 boys and 62 girls age 6-13 (mean =95) with follow-up interviews at one and two years Results reveal quiteconsistent patterns wherein at any one time approximately one-third ofthe children report being interested in fire slightly less than half reportplaying with matches and slightly less than one-third report having setplay fires Viewed individually by the end of the study almost three-quarters of the participants had at some time played with matches orset a play fire Perrin-Wallqvist and Norlander (2003) retrospectively sur-veyed 50 18-year old Swedish men and 45 18-19 year old Swedishwomen Seventy percent of the men reported having played with fireduring childhood and 44 of the women did likewise The principalmotives for childhood fire play were curiosity entertainment and excite-ment seeking a high proportion of subjects reported being fascinated ordrawn to fire Paralleling this result Perrin-Wallqvist et al (Perrin-Wallqvist Archer amp Norlander 2004) surveyed 28 male and 28 female
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 435
436 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Swedish 16-year olds concerning emotional attitudes toward fire While61 thought fire was ldquocozyrdquo and 20 found fire ldquoexcitingrdquo only 9thought that fire was ldquouninterestingrdquo 27 of the respondents found firesufficiently entertaining that they lit fires when bored
Simonsen and Bullis (2001) surveyed 5416 third through eighth gradeOregonian students relatively evenly distributed across ages regardingfire starting interest in fire and motivations for fire play Forty-sevenpercent of students reported having played with fire a retrospective ques-tion revealed that 10 reported starting their first fire between the agesof one and five 27 reported starting their first fire between the agesof six and ten and 10 reported starting their first fire between theages of 11 and 15 Attraction to and interest in fire was quite highalthough only 29 overtly reported being interested in fire 46 reportedliking television programs that involve fire 61 reported enjoying assist-ing adults in lighting or putting out fire 33 reported enjoying burn-ing objects such as twigs grass or paper and 21 reported enjoyingplaying with matches or lighters Correspondingly fire had high enter-tainment value for children with large proportions of respondents cit-ing as motives for fire starting ldquojust for funrdquo (23) and ldquoout of boredomrdquo(19) with curiousity (ldquoto see what would happenrdquo) another significantcontributor (18)
Cotterall (2003) conducted a similar survey of 3031 students fromgrade 3 through 13 in Sudbury Ontario A number of patterns aremarkedly evident First while the frequency of actual fire play shows asteady increase across the age span studied (18 of third graders reporthaving played with matches or lighters in the last year while 81 ofthirteenth graders report having done so) what Cotterall terms lsquoexpressedpreoccupation and fascination with firersquo (eg ldquoAre you curious aboutfirerdquo ldquoAre you really interested in fire and what it can dordquo etc) doesnot vary in any regular fashion across this age range and likewise thelower-level factor that Cotterall terms lsquoexpressed interest in firersquo (egldquoDo you like to start firesrdquo ldquoDo you feel excited when you watch afire burningrdquo ldquoDo you like staring at firerdquo etc) shows only a gradualincrease with age These patterns suggest that the age-related changesin fire play documented by Cotterall are a function not of changes inattraction to fire but rather of changes in willingness to disobey ruleschanges in opportunities to engage in proscribed behavior outside of
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 436
A BURNING DESIRE 437
adult supervision and changes in access to sources of ignition Tellinglyacross ages the principal motives for fire starting are ldquojust for funrdquo ldquotosee what would happenrdquo ldquoto destroy somethingrdquo and ldquoboredomrdquo pat-terns that are even more marked among those who reported extensivefire play Equally important knowledge regarding institutionally-conveyedfire safety practices had virtually no relationship with the extent of fireplay
An indirect measure of childrenrsquos fire-related activity can be derivedfrom records of fires that whether by design or accident becomesufficiently large as to attract the attention of fire departments Okulitchand Pinsonneault (2002) compiled records of 4600 fires involving juve-niles in Oregon between 1996 and 2000 Twelve-year olds accountedfor the largest proportion of these fires with a steady increase in involve-ment from ages 1 to 12 and a steady decrease in involvement after age12 If we assume that in at least some sizable fraction of these firesthe fire starter had no intention of creating a conflagration sufficientlylarge as to result in the involvement of the authorities (cf Kafry 1980)then comparing this pattern to Cotterallrsquos findings suggests that in NorthAmerica age 12 constitutes the dangerous apex of the combination offactors listed above (willingness to disobey rules etc) and incompletemastery of fire such that it escapes the fire starterrsquos control
Lastly although not presented in the context of quantitative datadrawing on her experience with firesetters in Massachusetts Pinsonneaultconcludes that ldquo[c]ommon questions children have about fire includelsquoWhat makes fire hot How does a small fire grow Why are somefires very smoky Can everything burn How can you keep a firesmall How can you put fires outrdquo (Pinsonneault 2002223) Importantlythese are exactly the sort of questions that we might expect to be fore-most in the minds of individuals whose curiousity is not simply the prod-uct of a general interest in the world but rather reflects a domain-specificinformation-gathering system the purpose of which is to acquire the abil-ity to control fire
Although the studies reviewed above vary considerably in their detailsthey can be roughly summarized as follows a) western children firstbecome curious about fire in early childhood b) experimentation withfire increases as a function of age often extending well into adolescenceand c) for many individuals some attraction to fire persists into maturity
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 437
438 DANIEL M T FESSLER
a pattern consistent with the entertainment value that many westernadults place on activities such as gazing into a fire The question remainshowever as to whether this trajectory directly reflects the workings of adevelopmental information acquisition system governed by an evolvedpsychological mechanism In particular it is telling that much fire playoccurs in adolescence in western populations First as was arguably truein most ancestral human societies in many small-scale societies todayadolescents particularly females engage in a great deal of productiveunsupervised economic activity (cf Kaplan Hill Lancaster amp Hurtado2000) Given that fire is an elementary part of the human tool kit itwould be odd if the acquisition of fire-control skills was normally soretarded that additional experimentation was still required during thesame phase of life when significant economic productivity has alreadycommenced Second a hallmark of adolescence in western nations is asubstantial increase in mobility and autonomy changes that often pre-cipitate engagement in proscribed activities that had previously been pre-cluded by caretaker supervision Combined with strong prohibitionsagainst fire play and for many limited exposure to fire on a daily basisthis pattern means that in much of the developed world adolescenceoften constitutes the first opportunity to extensively experiment with fireTogether these observations suggest that while studies of fire play inthe West are interesting in as much as they reveal considerable moti-vation to explore fire from a young age they nevertheless present whatis likely a highly distorted portrait of the developmental unfolding of amechanism aimed at acquiring fire knowledge and skills
Childrenrsquos interactions with fire in societies in which fire isroutinely used as a tool
Children and fire in Bengkulu Sumatra
Between 1990 and 1993 I conducted ethnographic fieldwork in a semi-traditional Bengkulu Malay fishing village on the west coast of SumatraAlthough I did not systematically collect data on childrenrsquos interactionswith fire my immersion in village life was such that I neverthelessrecorded many offhand observations and impressions allowing for asketch of childrenrsquos interactions with fire
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 438
A BURNING DESIRE 439
Because childcare duties and cooking duties were often delegated tothe same individuals from infancy on children in Bengkulu had ampleopportunity to observe others controlling fire Small children often saton or near their caretakers while the latter manipulated fire caretakersbrushed the child aside with a scolding if the child reached for burningor hot items but otherwise offered no instruction regarding the controlof fire Childrenrsquos autonomous manipulation of fire typically began aroundage 4 About this time children were allowed to build small fires andfrequently did cooking either mud pies and other pretend foods or actualmorsels Adults did not instruct children with regard to either buildingor maintaining a fire at most snapping at a child if play with or nearfire posed a danger the only input that might be considered pedagog-ical came from slightly older children who would sometimes narratetheir actions using a type of play-speech while handling fire Childrenrsquosinterest in such ldquokidrsquos firesrdquo seemed to peak around age 6-7 and dimin-ished rapidly thereafter disappearing entirely before age 10 Childrenages 3-6 sometimes poked at jumped over and similarly toyed withadult fires (resulting in one serious burn during my stay) but this waslimited in scope and frequency and again had largely subsided by mid-dle childhood Children age 6 and up were often sent to a neighborrsquoshouse to fetch burning embers for fire-starting By age 8 both girls andboys were commonly performing adult chores including cooking andtending fires and their interactions with fire were increasingly utilitar-ian in nature Adolescents and young adults (particularly men nearly allof whom smoked) would occasionally idlely flick cigarrette lighters toywith matches or poke at burning candles but such behavior was moreakin to fiddling than to interested experimentation and was not char-acterized by any excitement The only behavior that I observed thatcould even remotely be classified as fascination with fire occurred whena fad for making cap bombs swept the village boys age 5-8 would mod-ify old spark plugs to form the body of the bomb scrape match headsto obtain gunpowder then load the projectiles and throw them upwardsqueeling with glee when they produced a resounding Bang upon impactwith the ground
To summarize my (admittedly unsystematic) ethnographic observa-tions in one Bengkulu village children experienced early interaction withfire but received little or no instruction in controlling it Typically children
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 439
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
436 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Swedish 16-year olds concerning emotional attitudes toward fire While61 thought fire was ldquocozyrdquo and 20 found fire ldquoexcitingrdquo only 9thought that fire was ldquouninterestingrdquo 27 of the respondents found firesufficiently entertaining that they lit fires when bored
Simonsen and Bullis (2001) surveyed 5416 third through eighth gradeOregonian students relatively evenly distributed across ages regardingfire starting interest in fire and motivations for fire play Forty-sevenpercent of students reported having played with fire a retrospective ques-tion revealed that 10 reported starting their first fire between the agesof one and five 27 reported starting their first fire between the agesof six and ten and 10 reported starting their first fire between theages of 11 and 15 Attraction to and interest in fire was quite highalthough only 29 overtly reported being interested in fire 46 reportedliking television programs that involve fire 61 reported enjoying assist-ing adults in lighting or putting out fire 33 reported enjoying burn-ing objects such as twigs grass or paper and 21 reported enjoyingplaying with matches or lighters Correspondingly fire had high enter-tainment value for children with large proportions of respondents cit-ing as motives for fire starting ldquojust for funrdquo (23) and ldquoout of boredomrdquo(19) with curiousity (ldquoto see what would happenrdquo) another significantcontributor (18)
Cotterall (2003) conducted a similar survey of 3031 students fromgrade 3 through 13 in Sudbury Ontario A number of patterns aremarkedly evident First while the frequency of actual fire play shows asteady increase across the age span studied (18 of third graders reporthaving played with matches or lighters in the last year while 81 ofthirteenth graders report having done so) what Cotterall terms lsquoexpressedpreoccupation and fascination with firersquo (eg ldquoAre you curious aboutfirerdquo ldquoAre you really interested in fire and what it can dordquo etc) doesnot vary in any regular fashion across this age range and likewise thelower-level factor that Cotterall terms lsquoexpressed interest in firersquo (egldquoDo you like to start firesrdquo ldquoDo you feel excited when you watch afire burningrdquo ldquoDo you like staring at firerdquo etc) shows only a gradualincrease with age These patterns suggest that the age-related changesin fire play documented by Cotterall are a function not of changes inattraction to fire but rather of changes in willingness to disobey ruleschanges in opportunities to engage in proscribed behavior outside of
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 436
A BURNING DESIRE 437
adult supervision and changes in access to sources of ignition Tellinglyacross ages the principal motives for fire starting are ldquojust for funrdquo ldquotosee what would happenrdquo ldquoto destroy somethingrdquo and ldquoboredomrdquo pat-terns that are even more marked among those who reported extensivefire play Equally important knowledge regarding institutionally-conveyedfire safety practices had virtually no relationship with the extent of fireplay
An indirect measure of childrenrsquos fire-related activity can be derivedfrom records of fires that whether by design or accident becomesufficiently large as to attract the attention of fire departments Okulitchand Pinsonneault (2002) compiled records of 4600 fires involving juve-niles in Oregon between 1996 and 2000 Twelve-year olds accountedfor the largest proportion of these fires with a steady increase in involve-ment from ages 1 to 12 and a steady decrease in involvement after age12 If we assume that in at least some sizable fraction of these firesthe fire starter had no intention of creating a conflagration sufficientlylarge as to result in the involvement of the authorities (cf Kafry 1980)then comparing this pattern to Cotterallrsquos findings suggests that in NorthAmerica age 12 constitutes the dangerous apex of the combination offactors listed above (willingness to disobey rules etc) and incompletemastery of fire such that it escapes the fire starterrsquos control
Lastly although not presented in the context of quantitative datadrawing on her experience with firesetters in Massachusetts Pinsonneaultconcludes that ldquo[c]ommon questions children have about fire includelsquoWhat makes fire hot How does a small fire grow Why are somefires very smoky Can everything burn How can you keep a firesmall How can you put fires outrdquo (Pinsonneault 2002223) Importantlythese are exactly the sort of questions that we might expect to be fore-most in the minds of individuals whose curiousity is not simply the prod-uct of a general interest in the world but rather reflects a domain-specificinformation-gathering system the purpose of which is to acquire the abil-ity to control fire
Although the studies reviewed above vary considerably in their detailsthey can be roughly summarized as follows a) western children firstbecome curious about fire in early childhood b) experimentation withfire increases as a function of age often extending well into adolescenceand c) for many individuals some attraction to fire persists into maturity
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 437
438 DANIEL M T FESSLER
a pattern consistent with the entertainment value that many westernadults place on activities such as gazing into a fire The question remainshowever as to whether this trajectory directly reflects the workings of adevelopmental information acquisition system governed by an evolvedpsychological mechanism In particular it is telling that much fire playoccurs in adolescence in western populations First as was arguably truein most ancestral human societies in many small-scale societies todayadolescents particularly females engage in a great deal of productiveunsupervised economic activity (cf Kaplan Hill Lancaster amp Hurtado2000) Given that fire is an elementary part of the human tool kit itwould be odd if the acquisition of fire-control skills was normally soretarded that additional experimentation was still required during thesame phase of life when significant economic productivity has alreadycommenced Second a hallmark of adolescence in western nations is asubstantial increase in mobility and autonomy changes that often pre-cipitate engagement in proscribed activities that had previously been pre-cluded by caretaker supervision Combined with strong prohibitionsagainst fire play and for many limited exposure to fire on a daily basisthis pattern means that in much of the developed world adolescenceoften constitutes the first opportunity to extensively experiment with fireTogether these observations suggest that while studies of fire play inthe West are interesting in as much as they reveal considerable moti-vation to explore fire from a young age they nevertheless present whatis likely a highly distorted portrait of the developmental unfolding of amechanism aimed at acquiring fire knowledge and skills
Childrenrsquos interactions with fire in societies in which fire isroutinely used as a tool
Children and fire in Bengkulu Sumatra
Between 1990 and 1993 I conducted ethnographic fieldwork in a semi-traditional Bengkulu Malay fishing village on the west coast of SumatraAlthough I did not systematically collect data on childrenrsquos interactionswith fire my immersion in village life was such that I neverthelessrecorded many offhand observations and impressions allowing for asketch of childrenrsquos interactions with fire
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 438
A BURNING DESIRE 439
Because childcare duties and cooking duties were often delegated tothe same individuals from infancy on children in Bengkulu had ampleopportunity to observe others controlling fire Small children often saton or near their caretakers while the latter manipulated fire caretakersbrushed the child aside with a scolding if the child reached for burningor hot items but otherwise offered no instruction regarding the controlof fire Childrenrsquos autonomous manipulation of fire typically began aroundage 4 About this time children were allowed to build small fires andfrequently did cooking either mud pies and other pretend foods or actualmorsels Adults did not instruct children with regard to either buildingor maintaining a fire at most snapping at a child if play with or nearfire posed a danger the only input that might be considered pedagog-ical came from slightly older children who would sometimes narratetheir actions using a type of play-speech while handling fire Childrenrsquosinterest in such ldquokidrsquos firesrdquo seemed to peak around age 6-7 and dimin-ished rapidly thereafter disappearing entirely before age 10 Childrenages 3-6 sometimes poked at jumped over and similarly toyed withadult fires (resulting in one serious burn during my stay) but this waslimited in scope and frequency and again had largely subsided by mid-dle childhood Children age 6 and up were often sent to a neighborrsquoshouse to fetch burning embers for fire-starting By age 8 both girls andboys were commonly performing adult chores including cooking andtending fires and their interactions with fire were increasingly utilitar-ian in nature Adolescents and young adults (particularly men nearly allof whom smoked) would occasionally idlely flick cigarrette lighters toywith matches or poke at burning candles but such behavior was moreakin to fiddling than to interested experimentation and was not char-acterized by any excitement The only behavior that I observed thatcould even remotely be classified as fascination with fire occurred whena fad for making cap bombs swept the village boys age 5-8 would mod-ify old spark plugs to form the body of the bomb scrape match headsto obtain gunpowder then load the projectiles and throw them upwardsqueeling with glee when they produced a resounding Bang upon impactwith the ground
To summarize my (admittedly unsystematic) ethnographic observa-tions in one Bengkulu village children experienced early interaction withfire but received little or no instruction in controlling it Typically children
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 439
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
A BURNING DESIRE 437
adult supervision and changes in access to sources of ignition Tellinglyacross ages the principal motives for fire starting are ldquojust for funrdquo ldquotosee what would happenrdquo ldquoto destroy somethingrdquo and ldquoboredomrdquo pat-terns that are even more marked among those who reported extensivefire play Equally important knowledge regarding institutionally-conveyedfire safety practices had virtually no relationship with the extent of fireplay
An indirect measure of childrenrsquos fire-related activity can be derivedfrom records of fires that whether by design or accident becomesufficiently large as to attract the attention of fire departments Okulitchand Pinsonneault (2002) compiled records of 4600 fires involving juve-niles in Oregon between 1996 and 2000 Twelve-year olds accountedfor the largest proportion of these fires with a steady increase in involve-ment from ages 1 to 12 and a steady decrease in involvement after age12 If we assume that in at least some sizable fraction of these firesthe fire starter had no intention of creating a conflagration sufficientlylarge as to result in the involvement of the authorities (cf Kafry 1980)then comparing this pattern to Cotterallrsquos findings suggests that in NorthAmerica age 12 constitutes the dangerous apex of the combination offactors listed above (willingness to disobey rules etc) and incompletemastery of fire such that it escapes the fire starterrsquos control
Lastly although not presented in the context of quantitative datadrawing on her experience with firesetters in Massachusetts Pinsonneaultconcludes that ldquo[c]ommon questions children have about fire includelsquoWhat makes fire hot How does a small fire grow Why are somefires very smoky Can everything burn How can you keep a firesmall How can you put fires outrdquo (Pinsonneault 2002223) Importantlythese are exactly the sort of questions that we might expect to be fore-most in the minds of individuals whose curiousity is not simply the prod-uct of a general interest in the world but rather reflects a domain-specificinformation-gathering system the purpose of which is to acquire the abil-ity to control fire
Although the studies reviewed above vary considerably in their detailsthey can be roughly summarized as follows a) western children firstbecome curious about fire in early childhood b) experimentation withfire increases as a function of age often extending well into adolescenceand c) for many individuals some attraction to fire persists into maturity
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 437
438 DANIEL M T FESSLER
a pattern consistent with the entertainment value that many westernadults place on activities such as gazing into a fire The question remainshowever as to whether this trajectory directly reflects the workings of adevelopmental information acquisition system governed by an evolvedpsychological mechanism In particular it is telling that much fire playoccurs in adolescence in western populations First as was arguably truein most ancestral human societies in many small-scale societies todayadolescents particularly females engage in a great deal of productiveunsupervised economic activity (cf Kaplan Hill Lancaster amp Hurtado2000) Given that fire is an elementary part of the human tool kit itwould be odd if the acquisition of fire-control skills was normally soretarded that additional experimentation was still required during thesame phase of life when significant economic productivity has alreadycommenced Second a hallmark of adolescence in western nations is asubstantial increase in mobility and autonomy changes that often pre-cipitate engagement in proscribed activities that had previously been pre-cluded by caretaker supervision Combined with strong prohibitionsagainst fire play and for many limited exposure to fire on a daily basisthis pattern means that in much of the developed world adolescenceoften constitutes the first opportunity to extensively experiment with fireTogether these observations suggest that while studies of fire play inthe West are interesting in as much as they reveal considerable moti-vation to explore fire from a young age they nevertheless present whatis likely a highly distorted portrait of the developmental unfolding of amechanism aimed at acquiring fire knowledge and skills
Childrenrsquos interactions with fire in societies in which fire isroutinely used as a tool
Children and fire in Bengkulu Sumatra
Between 1990 and 1993 I conducted ethnographic fieldwork in a semi-traditional Bengkulu Malay fishing village on the west coast of SumatraAlthough I did not systematically collect data on childrenrsquos interactionswith fire my immersion in village life was such that I neverthelessrecorded many offhand observations and impressions allowing for asketch of childrenrsquos interactions with fire
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 438
A BURNING DESIRE 439
Because childcare duties and cooking duties were often delegated tothe same individuals from infancy on children in Bengkulu had ampleopportunity to observe others controlling fire Small children often saton or near their caretakers while the latter manipulated fire caretakersbrushed the child aside with a scolding if the child reached for burningor hot items but otherwise offered no instruction regarding the controlof fire Childrenrsquos autonomous manipulation of fire typically began aroundage 4 About this time children were allowed to build small fires andfrequently did cooking either mud pies and other pretend foods or actualmorsels Adults did not instruct children with regard to either buildingor maintaining a fire at most snapping at a child if play with or nearfire posed a danger the only input that might be considered pedagog-ical came from slightly older children who would sometimes narratetheir actions using a type of play-speech while handling fire Childrenrsquosinterest in such ldquokidrsquos firesrdquo seemed to peak around age 6-7 and dimin-ished rapidly thereafter disappearing entirely before age 10 Childrenages 3-6 sometimes poked at jumped over and similarly toyed withadult fires (resulting in one serious burn during my stay) but this waslimited in scope and frequency and again had largely subsided by mid-dle childhood Children age 6 and up were often sent to a neighborrsquoshouse to fetch burning embers for fire-starting By age 8 both girls andboys were commonly performing adult chores including cooking andtending fires and their interactions with fire were increasingly utilitar-ian in nature Adolescents and young adults (particularly men nearly allof whom smoked) would occasionally idlely flick cigarrette lighters toywith matches or poke at burning candles but such behavior was moreakin to fiddling than to interested experimentation and was not char-acterized by any excitement The only behavior that I observed thatcould even remotely be classified as fascination with fire occurred whena fad for making cap bombs swept the village boys age 5-8 would mod-ify old spark plugs to form the body of the bomb scrape match headsto obtain gunpowder then load the projectiles and throw them upwardsqueeling with glee when they produced a resounding Bang upon impactwith the ground
To summarize my (admittedly unsystematic) ethnographic observa-tions in one Bengkulu village children experienced early interaction withfire but received little or no instruction in controlling it Typically children
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 439
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
438 DANIEL M T FESSLER
a pattern consistent with the entertainment value that many westernadults place on activities such as gazing into a fire The question remainshowever as to whether this trajectory directly reflects the workings of adevelopmental information acquisition system governed by an evolvedpsychological mechanism In particular it is telling that much fire playoccurs in adolescence in western populations First as was arguably truein most ancestral human societies in many small-scale societies todayadolescents particularly females engage in a great deal of productiveunsupervised economic activity (cf Kaplan Hill Lancaster amp Hurtado2000) Given that fire is an elementary part of the human tool kit itwould be odd if the acquisition of fire-control skills was normally soretarded that additional experimentation was still required during thesame phase of life when significant economic productivity has alreadycommenced Second a hallmark of adolescence in western nations is asubstantial increase in mobility and autonomy changes that often pre-cipitate engagement in proscribed activities that had previously been pre-cluded by caretaker supervision Combined with strong prohibitionsagainst fire play and for many limited exposure to fire on a daily basisthis pattern means that in much of the developed world adolescenceoften constitutes the first opportunity to extensively experiment with fireTogether these observations suggest that while studies of fire play inthe West are interesting in as much as they reveal considerable moti-vation to explore fire from a young age they nevertheless present whatis likely a highly distorted portrait of the developmental unfolding of amechanism aimed at acquiring fire knowledge and skills
Childrenrsquos interactions with fire in societies in which fire isroutinely used as a tool
Children and fire in Bengkulu Sumatra
Between 1990 and 1993 I conducted ethnographic fieldwork in a semi-traditional Bengkulu Malay fishing village on the west coast of SumatraAlthough I did not systematically collect data on childrenrsquos interactionswith fire my immersion in village life was such that I neverthelessrecorded many offhand observations and impressions allowing for asketch of childrenrsquos interactions with fire
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 438
A BURNING DESIRE 439
Because childcare duties and cooking duties were often delegated tothe same individuals from infancy on children in Bengkulu had ampleopportunity to observe others controlling fire Small children often saton or near their caretakers while the latter manipulated fire caretakersbrushed the child aside with a scolding if the child reached for burningor hot items but otherwise offered no instruction regarding the controlof fire Childrenrsquos autonomous manipulation of fire typically began aroundage 4 About this time children were allowed to build small fires andfrequently did cooking either mud pies and other pretend foods or actualmorsels Adults did not instruct children with regard to either buildingor maintaining a fire at most snapping at a child if play with or nearfire posed a danger the only input that might be considered pedagog-ical came from slightly older children who would sometimes narratetheir actions using a type of play-speech while handling fire Childrenrsquosinterest in such ldquokidrsquos firesrdquo seemed to peak around age 6-7 and dimin-ished rapidly thereafter disappearing entirely before age 10 Childrenages 3-6 sometimes poked at jumped over and similarly toyed withadult fires (resulting in one serious burn during my stay) but this waslimited in scope and frequency and again had largely subsided by mid-dle childhood Children age 6 and up were often sent to a neighborrsquoshouse to fetch burning embers for fire-starting By age 8 both girls andboys were commonly performing adult chores including cooking andtending fires and their interactions with fire were increasingly utilitar-ian in nature Adolescents and young adults (particularly men nearly allof whom smoked) would occasionally idlely flick cigarrette lighters toywith matches or poke at burning candles but such behavior was moreakin to fiddling than to interested experimentation and was not char-acterized by any excitement The only behavior that I observed thatcould even remotely be classified as fascination with fire occurred whena fad for making cap bombs swept the village boys age 5-8 would mod-ify old spark plugs to form the body of the bomb scrape match headsto obtain gunpowder then load the projectiles and throw them upwardsqueeling with glee when they produced a resounding Bang upon impactwith the ground
To summarize my (admittedly unsystematic) ethnographic observa-tions in one Bengkulu village children experienced early interaction withfire but received little or no instruction in controlling it Typically children
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 439
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
A BURNING DESIRE 439
Because childcare duties and cooking duties were often delegated tothe same individuals from infancy on children in Bengkulu had ampleopportunity to observe others controlling fire Small children often saton or near their caretakers while the latter manipulated fire caretakersbrushed the child aside with a scolding if the child reached for burningor hot items but otherwise offered no instruction regarding the controlof fire Childrenrsquos autonomous manipulation of fire typically began aroundage 4 About this time children were allowed to build small fires andfrequently did cooking either mud pies and other pretend foods or actualmorsels Adults did not instruct children with regard to either buildingor maintaining a fire at most snapping at a child if play with or nearfire posed a danger the only input that might be considered pedagog-ical came from slightly older children who would sometimes narratetheir actions using a type of play-speech while handling fire Childrenrsquosinterest in such ldquokidrsquos firesrdquo seemed to peak around age 6-7 and dimin-ished rapidly thereafter disappearing entirely before age 10 Childrenages 3-6 sometimes poked at jumped over and similarly toyed withadult fires (resulting in one serious burn during my stay) but this waslimited in scope and frequency and again had largely subsided by mid-dle childhood Children age 6 and up were often sent to a neighborrsquoshouse to fetch burning embers for fire-starting By age 8 both girls andboys were commonly performing adult chores including cooking andtending fires and their interactions with fire were increasingly utilitar-ian in nature Adolescents and young adults (particularly men nearly allof whom smoked) would occasionally idlely flick cigarrette lighters toywith matches or poke at burning candles but such behavior was moreakin to fiddling than to interested experimentation and was not char-acterized by any excitement The only behavior that I observed thatcould even remotely be classified as fascination with fire occurred whena fad for making cap bombs swept the village boys age 5-8 would mod-ify old spark plugs to form the body of the bomb scrape match headsto obtain gunpowder then load the projectiles and throw them upwardsqueeling with glee when they produced a resounding Bang upon impactwith the ground
To summarize my (admittedly unsystematic) ethnographic observa-tions in one Bengkulu village children experienced early interaction withfire but received little or no instruction in controlling it Typically children
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 439
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
440 DANIEL M T FESSLER
had gained complete mastery of fire by age 7 and for most older chil-dren adolescents and adults fire was of only passing interest To explorewhether this pattern might be representative of societies that use fire inways more akin to those likely characteristic of ancestral humans I sur-veyed other ethnographers with regard to their recollections about chil-drenrsquos interest in play with and mastery of fire
Ethnographersrsquo impressions from 19 societies
I sent a questionnaire covering six general areas of interaction with fire(see Appendix) to anthropologists and others with extensive ethnographicfield experience Eighteen investigators responded providing informationon 19 cultures Table 1 summarizes this information None of the inves-tigators had conducted research focusing directly on childrenrsquos interac-tions with fire hence like my own observations from Bengkulu theirresponses should be considered preliminary accounts of this topic ratherthan definitive portraits thereof
Though not evenly distributed across extant traditional and semi-traditional societies the survey results do capture disparate geographicregions suggesting that any resulting patterns are unlikely to be explic-able as merely the product of cultural sharing or cultural diffusionAlthough variation exists several themes stand out First children begininteracting with fire early with ages ranging from toddlerhood to 6Second children generally do not play with fire in the manner charac-teristic of western children in most cultures studied there is little or noplay behavior involving fire and when it does occur such behavior seemsto have practice or semi-utilitarian functions akin to those that I observedamong the Bengkulu ndash with the exception of several reports of interestin firecrackers or their homemade equivalents none of the reports describechildren igniting materials simply to watch them burn Consistent withthese observations the majority of respondents report that fire has noentertainment value whatsoever ndash fire is viewed in strictly utilitarianterms and fire-gazing generally does not occur among children or adultsReports of childrenrsquos fire competence vary somewhat most of the respon-dents were more confident describing childrenrsquos ability to tend or main-tain a fire than they were reporting on childrenrsquos ability to build a firein part because in many of the societies studied people rarely start a
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 440
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
A BURNING DESIRE 441
fire from scratch relying instead on embers or coals from another fireGender differences with regard to fire competence were described for anumber of the societies with girls generally acquiring competence soonerthan boys andor achieving greater proficiency due to a gendered divi-sion of labor Focusing on whichever gender achieves proficiency ear-lier the age for achieving competence in maintaining a fire ranges from5 to 8 with the average being approximately 65
Discussion
To summarize the above while some variation exists ethnographersworking in disparate societies in which fire is routinely used as a toolreport patterns of fire behavior similar to those that I observed in SumatraChildrenrsquos interactions with fire begin early with mastery of fire typi-cally achieved by middle childhood Fire is viewed in utilitarian terms ndashit has little or no entertainment value and childrenrsquos fire play when itoccurs at all is best described in terms of practicing a necessary skillThese patterns underline the contrast between the developmental tra-jectory of fire learning in modern societies and that which occurs else-where For ancestral humans and their immediate predecessor speciesfire would have been a nearly-omnipresent tool an important but mun-dane facet of daily life and the same seems to characterize peoplersquosinteractions with fire in many contemporary traditional or small-scalesocieties This stands in contrast to firersquos role in most modern societieswhere it is used principally as decoration (hearth fires candles) enter-tainment (bonfires fireworks) or romantized marker of special circum-stances (barbeques campfires) functions that are neither frequent normundane At the same time that fire is culturally marked with height-ened affect children in modern societies have limited opportunities tolearn about fire through such low-level hands-on manipulations as tend-ing a cooking fire or building a play version thereof Hence many mod-ern societies may simultaneously enshrine fire as an emotional symboland a source of amusement (rather than a tool) and constrain childrenrsquosopportunities to acquire realistic information about and experience withfire One possible consequence of this pattern is that the developmentaltrajectory of fire learning is greatly retarded in the west with mastery
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 441
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
442 DANIEL M T FESSLERTab
le 1
Ethno
grap
hersrsquo
Recollections
Con
cern
ing
Childrenrsquo
s In
tera
ctions
with
Fire
Empty
cells
indica
te t
hat
no i
nformation
is a
vailab
le
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Yan
omam
o (1
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 n
o ge
nder
7-
8 g
irls m
ore
Min
imal
bull
Scol
ding
[Ven
ezue
la]
differ
ence
sco
mpe
tent
ampbo
ys p
lay
R
E d
ange
rkn
owle
dgea
ble
at a
rite
de
of
passag
eho
rsep
lay
invo
lvin
g fire
ne
ar fi
rebull
Obs
er-
vatio
n
Ach
e (2
)M
any
burn
s 1
-2
4 n
o ge
nder
U
tilita
rian
attem
pts
Mai
ntai
n 6
N
one
fire
is
Occ
asio
nal
[Par
agua
y]de
aths
al
l du
e to
di
ffer
ence
sto
bui
ldm
aint
ain
Bui
ld
8 bo
ring
ad
ult
slee
ping
nea
r fire
fire
s from
4 u
p n
oN
o ge
nder
diff
sin
stru
ctio
npl
ay p
er s
em
ostly
obs
er-
vatio
n an
dtria
l an
der
ror
Shua
r (3
)N
one
know
n 5-
6 y
oung
er k
ids
Min
imal
pla
y
Mai
ntai
n 8
or
Non
e af
ter
5-6
Possib
le[E
cuad
or]
show
fas
cina
tion
alth
ough
ea
rlie
r ex
cept
fire
-oc
casion
alpr
e-te
ens
teen
s
Bui
ld
10 o
r cr
acke
rs
adul
t m
ake
fire
cra
cker
sea
rlie
r G
irls
war
ning
s or
better
ski
lled
instru
ctio
nm
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nan
d tria
lan
d er
ror
Mat
sige
nka
(4)
Non
e kn
own
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
no
3 n
o ge
nder
5
no
gend
er
Fire
is
only
a
No
war
ning
s [P
eru]
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sdi
ffer
ence
sga
ther
ing
poin
t or
(roa
stin
g fu
nin
stru
ctio
nfo
od
etc
)ob
serv
atio
non
ly
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 442
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
A BURNING DESIRE 443Bw
a M
aweg
o (5
)M
any
min
or b
urns
Girls f
rom
age
4
Var
ies
Girls 7
-8
boys
N
one
[Dom
inic
a]from
coo
king
fire
sbo
ys l
ater
late
r
Zin
acan
tec
May
a2
know
n c
ooki
ng
Girls f
rom
age
4
Girls p
lay
cook
ing
Girls
build
ampN
one
War
ning
of
(6)
fire
crac
kers
boys
rar
ely
age
6-10
bo
ys
mai
ntai
n sm
fire
todd
lers
[M
exic
o]on
ly p
lay
w
by 6
bi
g fire
by
Obs
erva
tion
fire
crac
kers
8
Boy
s d
onrsquot
of a
dults
deal
w
fire
and
sibl
ings
in
stru
ctio
nfrom
old
er
child
ren
during
pla
y
Lab
rado
r M
etis amp
Man
y bu
rns
At
firs
t w
alki
ng
Girls
7 Pl
ay w
Po
ssib
le
Innu
(7)
Boy
s 9
-10
kero
sene
adul
t[N
ewfo
undl
and]
instru
ctio
n
Fijia
n (8
)4
year
old
fel
l in
Boy
s ag
e 7-
10 r
un
Mai
ntai
n 7
(see
fire
pla
y)N
o [Y
asaw
a Is
l F
iji]
fire
w
bu
rnin
gBui
ld
in
stru
ctio
nstic
ks
Man
agal
ase
(9)
Man
y bu
rns 1
Ver
y ea
rly
No
play
per
se
5-6
no
gend
er[P
apua
New
fa
talit
y m
ostly
due
Em
bers
use
d fo
ral
thou
gh m
ake
differ
ence
sG
uine
a]to
sle
epin
g ne
ar fi
relig
ht b
y 3-
4de
sign
s w
em
bers
at n
ight
Gim
i (1
0)N
one
know
n5
girls h
andl
e fire
Bui
ld amp
Boy
s pl
ay w
M
ostly
[N
ew B
rita
in
mor
e (c
ooki
ng)
mai
ntai
n 8
m
atch
esob
serv
atio
nPa
pua
New
Prob
ably
ear
lier
Non
e fo
r ad
ults
of o
lder
Gui
nea]
for
girls
child
ren
Ilah
ita A
rape
shM
any
burn
s3
no
gend
erU
tilita
rian
fire
5-6
no
gend
erN
one
No
war
ning
s(1
1) [
Papu
a N
ew
todd
lers
stu
mbl
edi
ffer
ence
sha
ndlin
g from
di
ffer
ence
th
ough
Som
e ad
ult
Gui
nea]
into
fire
el
derly
roll
3 up
girls
are
mor
ein
stru
ctio
n of
into
fire
whi
lesk
illed
youn
g gi
rls
slee
ping
mos
tlyob
serv
atio
n
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 443
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
444 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Nam
e of
gro
up
Seriou
s bu
rns
Age
1st i
nter
actio
n A
ge 1
st fi
re p
lay
Age
com
pete
ntEnt
erta
inm
ent
bull
War
ning
scu
lture
bull
gend
er
bull ge
nder
bull
gend
er
bull Lea
rnin
g
Kel
abit
(12)
Non
e kn
own
Ver
y ea
rly
6 b
oys
ofte
n W
arni
ngs
to[B
orne
o]bu
ild fi
res
to
babi
es
cook
gam
esu
perv
isio
n of
you
ngch
ildre
nrsquos
fire
s
Mul
tiple
cas
tes
in
Man
y bu
rns
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Girls
6-7
Non
eSc
ary
stor
ies
Bhu
bane
swar
pl
ay w
ith fi
reBoy
s u
nkno
wn
to w
arn
Indi
a (1
3)do
nrsquot
deal
w
infa
nts
and
fire
child
ren
Lea
rn b
yob
serv
atio
n
Nur
zay
Wes
tern
Tw
o ca
ses e
ach
Ver
y ea
rly
Chi
ldre
n do
not
Ten
ding
fire
4-
5N
one
stric
tlyN
o di
rect
Paht
un (
14)
age
3be
gin
poki
ng a
t pl
ay w
ith fi
reBui
ld amp
mai
ntai
nut
ilita
rian
instru
ctio
n[A
fgha
nistan
]fire
as
todd
lers
fire
5-
6m
uch
but
it is u
tilita
rian
N
o ge
nder
diff
sob
serv
atio
nad
ults
com
men
t on
mista
kes
Pim
bwe
(15)
2 ch
ild f
atal
ities
5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
8-9
for
fire
sFi
re i
s fo
cus
ofN
o w
arni
ngs
[Tan
zani
a]m
any
burn
sdi
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
ou
tsid
e of
hou
se
soci
aliz
ing
but
No
dire
ctat
age
7
no
10-1
1 fo
r fire
sth
is i
s du
e to
instru
ctio
nge
nder
diff
eren
ces
inside
of
hous
ew
arm
th (
only
)C
hild
ren
do n
ot
build
pla
y fire
s
Tab
le 1
(co
nt)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 444
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
A BURNING DESIRE 445K
ipsigi
s (1
5)1
fata
lity
man
y5-
6 n
o ge
nder
Em
bers
car
ried
for
7 fo
r fire
s ou
tsid
eN
one
stric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
burn
s (5
6 o
f di
ffer
ence
sut
ilita
rian
rea
sons
of h
ouse
no
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctac
cide
nts
unde
r at
age
5-6
no
gend
er d
iffer
ence
sin
stru
ctio
nag
e 5)
gend
er d
iffer
ence
s8
for
fire
s in
side
Ext
ensive
Chi
ldre
n do
not
of
hou
se
mor
eob
serv
atio
nbu
ild p
lay
fire
sco
mm
on f
or g
irls
Muk
ogod
o (1
6)M
any
burn
s m
ostly
Girls
3Boy
s 6
Mai
ntai
n 6
-7
Non
e s
tric
tlyN
o w
arni
ngs
[Ken
ya]
child
ren
Boy
s a
bit
late
rG
irls
none
kno
wn
mos
tly g
irls
utili
tarian
No
dire
ctBui
ld
Tee
nage
in
stru
ctio
n(m
atch
es a
re
expe
nsiv
e k
ept
from
chi
ldre
n)
Aba
shisha
A
few
bur
n sc
ars
4-5
mor
e Beg
ins
at a
ge 6
6-
7Litt
le o
bvio
usM
inim
alA
balu
yia
(17)
obse
rved
com
mon
for
m
ost
freq
uent
6-1
2in
tere
st ndash
instru
ctio
n[K
enya
]gi
rls
ut
ilita
rian
by
adu
ltsan
d ol
der
child
ren
m
ostly
ob
serv
atio
nm
imic
ry
Had
za (
18)
1 ac
cide
ntal
bur
n6
mon
ths n
oC
arry
coa
ls f
orBui
ld a
ndN
one
No
[Tan
zani
a]ge
nder
diff
eren
ces
utili
tarian
pur
pose
sm
aint
ain
by 6
in
stru
ctio
nstar
ting
age
3-4
no
gen
der
obse
rvat
ion
no g
ende
r di
ffer
ence
son
lydi
ffer
ence
s
Nev
er o
bser
ved
play
fire
s
Res
pond
ents (1
) R
aym
ond
B H
ames
(2
) K
im R
H
ill (3
) H
C
lark
Bar
rett (4
) C
arol
ina
Izqu
ierd
o (5)
Mar
k V
Fl
inn
(6)
Ash
ley
E M
ayna
rd (7
) Evi
ePl
aice
(8
) Jo
seph
Hen
rich
(9
) W
illia
m M
cKel
lin
(10)
Ste
phen
Le
(11
) D
onal
d F
Tuz
in
(12)
Mon
ica
Jano
wsk
i (1
3) S
usan
C
Seym
our (
14)
Mic
hael
Cas
imir
(15)
Mon
ique
Bor
gerh
offM
ulde
r (
16)
Lee
Cro
nk
(17)
Tho
mas
S
Wei
sner
(1
8) F
rank
W
Mar
low
e
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 445
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
446 DANIEL M T FESSLER
of fire occuring a decade or more later than is the case when childreninteract with fire in a manner more akin to that which has likely beentypical for most of human history A second possible consequence is thatthe motives that drive fire learning are only incompletely satisfied withthe result that throughout life fire retains greater allure or fascinationthan would normally be the case in turn this pattern provides a per-sonal foundation for the acquisition and perpetuation of the lsquotoyrsquo mean-ings ascribed to fire in modern societies1
For scholars seeking to explore evolutionary hypotheses the possi-bilities detailed above constrain the utility of some avenues for explor-ing fire learning in the west as conclusions derived from naturalisticobservations of western childrenrsquos fire behavior will likely fail to gener-alize beyond developed societies However precisely the same featuresmay also enhance the empirical weight of findings obtained throughexperimentation By way of analogy Barrett and Behne (2005) conductedexperiments showing that there are remarkable parallels between Germanand Shuar children in the development of an understanding of deathparallels that occur despite the fact that German children have far lessexposure to actual instances of death and have far more exposure tomisinformation (eg cartoon portrayals of immediate recovery from cat-astrophic injury etc) Children in the US are exposed to a plethoraof misinformation concerning fire (Hardesty amp Gayton 2002) includingnumerous highly unrealistic portrayals of fire on toy packaging (Curri et al 2003) and in television advertisements (Palmieri et al 2004)Consider for example the lessons that a child might derive from arecent Taco Bell commercial in which basketball star Shaquille OrsquoNealis engulfed in flames whereupon he calmly asks the camera ldquoIs it hotin here or is it just merdquo Paralleling Barrettrsquos work the thesis thathumans possess evolved psychological mechanisms dedicated to the acqui-sition of fire-relevant information predicts that despite such misinfor-mation and lack of experience children in modern societies shouldresemble children in small-scale societies where such resemblance occursnot with respect to fire knowledge per se but rather with regard to the
1 Similar reasoning may explain the fascination with predators both real and imag-inary that characterizes many modern cultures in which few individuals will ever encountera truly dangerous animal (cf Barrett 2005)
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 446
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
A BURNING DESIRE 447
ease and rapidity with which they learn which substances burn andwhich do not their tendency to make category errors within rather thanacross these two classes and so on With this in mind I encourage inves-tigators to explore the psychology of fire in children of both modernand developing nations
In addition to having consequences for research into the psycholog-ical foundations of fire learning the evolutionarily novel nature of west-ern childrenrsquos interactions with fire has potentially important implicationsfor public policy Fire safety officials spend a substantial amount of timeenergy and money trying to educate children regarding the dangers offire yet existing evidence suggests that at best these efforts have onlylimited impact on childrenrsquos actual behavior (cf Cotterall 2003) In mod-ern societies adult-initiated pedagogy such as this plays an importantrole in information transfer However teaching is far less significant inthe learning processes that occur in many small-scale societies Ratherchildren spend much of their time either on the sidelines watching theskilled performance of locally-adaptive behaviors or attempting to engagein play-like learning behaviors (Fiske nd Mead 1943) the same appearsto be true of fire learning It is possible that the latter mode is moreappropriate for learning skills having a deep evolutionary history Thethesis that fire learning is shaped by a domain-specific information-acqui-sition mechanism suggests that opportunities to observe others interact-ing with fire in a mundane fashion and opportunities to manipulate firefree of the titillation of proscription may ultimately prove more effectivethan direct pedagogy in managing the threat to public safety posed bychildrenrsquos fire play in modern societies
As noted earlier again motivated by public safety concerns a significantportion of the existing research on the psychology of fire focuses onaberrant individuals persons who are at high risk of recidivism in thecommission of fire-related crimes Importantly investigations of psy-chopathology may provide an additional avenue for exploring the evolvedpsychology of fire use Just as phobias offer a window into the psycho-logical mechanisms that evolved to cope with recurrent threats to ances-tral humans (Oumlhman amp Mineka 2001) so too may it be possible toexplore manias as a window into the mechanisms that evolved to copewith recurrent resources or opportunities (examples unrelated to fireinclude erotomania and kleptomania) Considerable attention has been
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 447
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
448 DANIEL M T FESSLER
dedicated to the clinical study of pyromania However to date investi-gators have largely framed the study of disordered fascination with fireusing superordinate categories (eg impulse control disorders aggressiv-ity disorders etc) that overlook the unique importance of fire in humanevolution An evolutionary perspective suggests that useful insights intothe mind of the pyromaniac may be gained by focusing on the specificfeatures of fire that motivate fire-setting behavior at present we knowlittle about how or why fire excites or stimulates such individuals Likewiselight may be shed on pyromania by the thesis that viewed both cross-culturally and evolutionarily western societies structure childrenrsquos inter-actions with fire in a highly unusual manner ndash the ontogeny of thiscondition may epitomize the costs of disrupting the normal trajectory ofinformation-acquisition processes that are guided by evolved mechanisms
Alone among the components of the tool kits of our ancestors firecontinues to play important roles in contemporary human life Whetheras a useful tool or a destructive object of fascination fire has an impacton societies large and small yet we know little about the psychology offire fire learning and the impact of culture on these factors It is hightime that we knew more
Appendix
Survey Regarding Childrenrsquos Interactions With Fire
1 Name of groupsocietypeople at issue2 Do you know of any serious burns (including deaths) due to fire
Please briefly explain (ie age of individual[s] outcome etc)3 At approximately what age do children first begin interacting with
(ie manipulating poking at etc) fire Is there a gender differencein this regard
4 At what age do children typically begin playing with fire (carryingburning objects building play fires etc) In what age range is suchbehavior most frequent if it occurs Any gender differences
5 At what age are children fully competent to maintain a fire At whatage are children fully competent to startbuild a fire Any genderdifferences
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 448
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
A BURNING DESIRE 449
6 Do children display entertainment interest in fire (ie watching firefor long periods manipulating fires to create interesting effects etc)Are there are age or gender differences Do adults display such interest
7 Do adults or older children directly instruct children with regard tothe dangers of fire How do children learn techniques for maintain-ing a fire How do children learn techniques for startingbuilding afire
REFERENCES
Barrett H C2005 Adaptations to predators and prey In D M Buss (Ed) The evolutionary psy-
chology handbook (pp 200-223) Hoboken NJ WileyBarrett H C amp Behne T
2005 Childrenrsquos understanding of death as the cessation of agency a test usingsleep versus death Cognition 96(2) 93-108
Brain C K amp Sillen A1988 Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire Nature 336(6198)
464-466Brown D E
1991 Human universals New York McGraw-HillClark J D amp Harris J W K
1985 Fire and its roles in early hominid lifeways African Archaeological Review 3(1)3-27
Cotterall A J2003 A survey of the disposition affinity interest and experience with fire of students in the
city of Greater Sudbury Unpublished MA thesis Laurentian University SudburyOntario
Curri T B Palmieri T L Aoki T H Kaulkin C K Lunn M EGregory C M et al
2003 Playing with fire Images of fire on toy packaging Journal of Burn Care amp
Rehabilitation 24(3) 163-165Fiske A P Learning a culture the way informants do observing imitating and participating
(nd) Unpublished manuscriptGarcia J Ervin F R amp Koelling R A
1966 Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement Psychonomic Science 5 121-122
Goren-Inbar N Alperson N Kislev M E Simchoni O Melamed Y Ben-Nun A et al
2004 Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yarsquoaqov Israel Science304(5671) 725-727
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 449
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
450 DANIEL M T FESSLER
Hall J R J2003 Children playing with fire Quincy MA National Fire Protection Association
Hardesty V A amp Gayton W F2002 The problem of children and fire An historical perspective In D J Kolko
(Ed) Handbook on firesetting children and youth (pp 1-13) San Diego AcademicPress
Kafry D1980 Playing with matches Children and fire In D Canter (Ed) Fires and human
behavior (1st ed pp 47-61) New York John Wiley amp SonsKaplan H Hill K Lancaster J amp Hurtado A M
2000 A theory of human life history evolution Diet intelligence and longevityEvolutionary Anthropology 9(4) 156-185
Kolko D J (Ed)2002 Handbook on firesetting Children and youth San Diego Academic Press
Kolko D J Day B T Bridge J A amp Kazdin A E2001 Two-year prediction of childrenrsquos firesetting in clinically referred and non-
referred samples Journal of Child Psychology amp Psychiatry amp Allied Disciplines
42(3) 371-380Mead M
1943 Our educational emphases in primitive perspective American Journal of Sociology
48(6) 633-639Mineka S Davidson M Cook M amp Keir R
1984 Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys Journal of Abnormal
Psychology 93(4) 355-372Oumlhman A
1993 Stimulus prepotency and fear learning Data and theory In N Birbaumeramp A Oumlhman (Eds) The organization of emotion Cognitive clinical and psycho-
physiological aspects (pp 218-239) Toronto Hogrefe and HubeOumlhman A amp Mineka S
2001 Fears phobias and preparedness Toward an evolved module of fear andfear learning Psychological Review 108(3) 483-522
Okulitch J S amp Pinsonneault I2002 The interdisciplinary approach to juvenile firesetting A dialogue In D J
Kolko (Ed) Handbook on firesetting in children and youth (pp 58-74) San DiegoAcademic Press
Palmieri T L Aoki T Combs E Curri T Garma S Kaulkin C et al2004 Saturday-morning television Do sponsors promote high-risk behavior for
burn injury Journal of Burn Care amp Rehabilitation 25(4) 381-385Perrin-Wallqvist R Archer T amp Norlander T
2004 Adolescentsrsquo fire-setting awareness under boredom Relation to personalityvariables Psychological Reports 94 863-871
Perrin-Wallqvist R amp Norlander T2003 Firesetting and playing with fire during childhood and adolescence Interview
studies of 18-year old male draftees and of 18-19-year old female pupilsLegal and Criminological Psychology 8(2) 151-157
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 450
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451
A BURNING DESIRE 451
Pinsonneault I L2002 Fire safety education and skills training In D J Kolko (Ed) Handbook on
firesetting in children and youth (pp 219-260) San Diego Academic PressRagir S
2000 Diet and food preparation Rethinking early hominid behavior Evolutionary
Anthropology 9(4) 153-155Simonsen B amp Bullis M
2001 Fire interest survey Final report Salem OR Oregon Office of the State FireMarshal
Stanford C B1999 The hunting apes Meat eating and the origins of human behavior Princeton NJ
Princeton University PressSteen F F amp Owens S
2001 Evolutionrsquos pedagogy An adaptationist model of pretense and entertainmentJournal of Cognition and Culture 1(4) 289-321
Tooby J Cosmides L amp Barrett H C2005 Resolving the debate on innate ideas Learnability constraints and the evolved
interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions In P CarruthersS Laurence amp S Stich (Eds) The innate mind Structure and contents (pp 305-337) New York Oxford University Press
Wolf A P1993 Westermarck redivivus Annual Review of Anthropology 22 157-175
Wrangham R W Jones J H Laden G Pilbeam D amp Conklin-Brittain N 1999 The raw and the stolen Cooking and the ecology of human origins Current
Anthropology 40(5) 567-594
JOCC_63-4_f5-428-451 91806 1221 PM Page 451