Upload
jeremy-porter
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A. Bross MICE CM17 February MuCool Test Area Facility to test all components of cooling channel (not a test of ionization cooling) u At high beam power s Designed to accommodate full Linac Beam s 1.6 X Hz – 2.4 X p/s – 600 W into 35 cm LH MeV u RF power from Linac (201 and 805 MHz test stands) s Waveguides pipe power to MTA
Citation preview
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 1
MuCool RF Program
805 and 201 MHz Studies
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 2
RF Cavity R and D
ANL/FNAL/IIT/LBNL/UMiss/Cockcroft
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 3
MuCool Test Area
Facility to test all components of cooling channel (not a test of ionization cooling)
At high beam power Designed to accommodate full Linac Beam 1.6 X 1013
p/pulse @15 Hz – 2.4 X 1014 p/s– 600 W into 35 cm LH2 absorber @ 400 MeV
RF power from Linac (201 and 805 MHz test stands) Waveguides pipe power to MTA
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 4
MTA Hall
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 5
MTA Hall Instrumentation
805
201CsI
Plastic Scintillator
Magnet
Chipmunk
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 6
Fundamental Focus Of RF R&D
Study the limits on Accelerating Gradient in NCRF cavities in magnetic field
However We believe that the
behavior of RF systems in general can be accurately described (predicted) by
Tensile strength of the material(s) used in the cavity fabrication (T)
Local surface field enhancements (eq)
Esurf = 2T//eq
This applies to all accelerating structures
In SC structures local heating becomes problem first
Follows universal curve
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 7
805 MHz
Data seem to follow universal curve
Max stable gradient degrades quickly with B field
Remeasured Same results Does not condition
Gra
dien
t in
MV/
m
Peak Magnetic Field in T at the Window
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 8
First RF 805 MHz Commissioning without
Magnetic Field Last MarchRadation Mon.#1 vs Gradient
y = 3E-22x16.246
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Gradient in MV/m
Rad
iatio
n in
mR
em/h
r
+ Time
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 9
First Radiation Measurement with Magnetic Field compared to No Field Data
Rad Mon #1 vs Grad with 2.5 justa-positioned with no Field
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Grad mV/m
Rad
iatio
n m
Rem
/hr 2.5 T Line
Lines Without Magnetic Field
March 06, Results.
Safe E Field Limit ~ 16MV/m Detector Distance=1.34 m
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 10
Nov. 06 Results: Electric field limit at 2.5 T in the LBLSingle Cell Cavity with Curve Be Windows coated with
TiN
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
RF Commissioning with Mag Field at 2.5 T
Pre RF Commissioning without Mag Field
Nov. 06 Results:Safe E field Limit ~16 MV/mDetector Distance=2.73 m Acccounts for scale
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 11
Latest Electric field limit Data at 2.5 T and 1.25 T in the LBLSingle Cell Cavity with Curve Be Windows
coated with TiN
0102030405060708090
13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27
Gradient MV/m
Rad
iatio
n m
R/H
r
Asymptotic Gradient limit line at 1.25 T
2.5 T Data
RF Conditioning without Magnetic Field
The Asymptotic limit line shown indicates the continuous Gradient sparking limit. In all the cases studied including Lab G this line as predicted the Gradient Limit for the cases under Study.
For the 1.25 T case the Save operating limit has been shown to be
20 MV/m
1.25 T Data
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 12
Comparison of Lab G Results with the MTA Data
Safe Operating Gradient Limit vs Magnetic Field Level at Window for the three different
Coil modes
40403736
3432.431.73128.8
26.7426.425.922
404037.663535.2
3028.527.327
4040
25.7523.2522.521.520.9
16.5 15 13.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 1 2 3 4 5Peak Magnectic Field in T at the Window
Elec
tric
Gra
dien
t in
MV/
m
(Solenoid)Yellow
(Opposing) Red
(Single Coil)Black Diamond
MTA Result ~ 16 MV/mMTA 1.25 T Result Jan. 07
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 13
805 MHz Imaging
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 14
Next 805 MHz study - Buttons
Button test Evaluate various materials and
coatings Quick Change over
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 15
RF R&D – 201 MHz Cavity Design
The 201 MHz Cavity is now operating New data on x-ray backgrounds will be presented
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 16
X-Ray Detectors
#16: NaI crystal (1.5” diameter × 2”), upstream of 201 cavity #8: large thick scintillator paddle,
upstream of 201 cavity similar to MICE TOF(14” × 14.5” × 0.5”)
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 17
Procedures X-ray background measurements
Recording x-ray events for 1000 rf pulses Creating electronic gates to record
x-ray events at rf envelope during fill, flattop, decay and total range of rf pulse. RF pulse length ~ 100-μs
X-ray energy spectrum measurements
The histogram memory HM413 was calibrated with Co60 source
HM413 histogram memory was used to histogram the signals from AD413A ADC
Note: there is cosmic-ray background for all the measurements
1.17MeV peak
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 18
X-Ray Background Measurement of the 201-MHz cavity
Data taken in Dec. 2006 and Jan. 2007 with superconducting solenoid off The counting rates have been measured as a function of rf gradients. In
comparison with the x-ray intensity, the cosmic background is negligible. For MICE, accelerating gradient is 8MV/m limited by rf source
MICE gradient
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 19
Multipactoring Study
─ The impact of an electron to a surface can, depending on its energy and angle, release one or more secondary electrons into the vacuum.
─ These electrons can then be accelerated by the RF fields and impact with the same or another surface. Should the impact energies, number of electrons released and timing of the impacts be such that a sustained multiplication of the number of electrons occurs, the phenomenon can grow exponentially and may lead to operational problems of the RF system such as damage of RF components or loss/distortion of the RF signal.
Multipactoring is an effect that occurs when the Multipactoring is an effect that occurs when the electrons accelerated by RF fields are resonantly electrons accelerated by RF fields are resonantly enhanced via an electron avalanche caused by enhanced via an electron avalanche caused by secondary electron emissionsecondary electron emission
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 20
Multipactoring?
Possible multipactoring effects at some gradients, e.g., ~ 6.8MV/m in 201MHz cavity
There may be a very weak multipactoring effect. But too weak to distort rf field and produce huge ripples like above.
Multipactoring?
Typical multipactoring waveform pattern observed at
the 805 MHz cavity at MTA
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 21
Energy Spectrum Measurement of the 201MHz cavity
At 8-MV/m, the total counts recorded during 1000 rf pulses: #8: ~ 30,000; #16: ~ 21,000
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 22
X-Ray Background Measurement of the 805-MHz Cavity
When the rf gradient is higher than ~ 13-MV/m, the counting rates increase significantly (over 1 million/s) the NaI detector is not able to keep up and saturated. The counting rate is not accurate anymore, nor is the energy spectrum.
Cosmic background
x-ray
saturated
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 23
201 MHz Cavity Status
The 201 MHz Cavity is back up ready for operation We had a short in the 4” coax feeds to the couplers
The problem seemed to stem from the fact that parts from multiple vendors where used in the 4” coax run
Power coupler Straight sections Elbows
At the interfaces between parts from different vendors, the fit-up was not ideal
Inner conductor specifications seemed to vary This has now been fixed In addition we will be using pressurized (12 pisg) SF6
in the 4” coax run as the insulating gas instead of air
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 24
201 Coax Post-Mortem
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 25
A. Bross MICE CM17 February 2007 26
High Pressure H2 Filled Cavity WorkMuon’s Inc
High Pressure Test Cell Study breakdown
properties of materials in H2
Run in B field No degradation in M.S.G. up
to 3.5T