20
A Appendix Figure A3: Treatment 1: Exposure to Violence 1

A Appendix Figure A3: Treatment 1: Exposure to Violencecambridge... · 2019. 3. 12. · 2.21 ⇤⇤⇤ 2.13 ... Income and Wealth x Violence 0.17 (0.14) Government Occupation x Violence

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • A Appendix

    Figure A3: Treatment 1: Exposure to Violence

    1

  • Figure A4: Treatment 2: Economic Growth/National Status

    Figure A5: Treatment 3: Integrative Institutions/Youths Joining Army

    2

  • Figure A6: Treatment 4: Common Geography

    3

  • Figure A7: Map of Region

    Note: sourced from WikiMedia Commons. Produced by the Central Intelligence Agency. URL:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kashmir_region_2004.jpg

    4

  • Table

    A7:Observed

    Correlation

    betweenSelf-Rep

    ortedViolence

    Exp

    osure

    andIdentification

    :Part1/4

    Ranke

    dIndianIden

    tity

    (1-4)

    Iden

    tity:Indian/Indian+Kash

    miri(1/0)

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    (5)

    (6)

    Violence

    Exposure

    �0.08⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.07⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.05⇤⇤

    �0.0001

    �0.01

    0.02

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    Age

    :18

    -27

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.02

    (0.04)

    (0.04)

    (0.03)

    (0.02)

    Age

    :28

    -49

    �0.08⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.07⇤⇤

    �0.02

    �0.01

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    Gen

    der:Fem

    ale

    0.03

    0.02

    �0.04

    �0.04

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    >=HighSch

    ool

    0.04

    0.05

    0.01

    0.02

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    Religion:Sunni

    �0.93⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.89⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.43⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.41⇤

    ⇤⇤

    (0.16)

    (0.16)

    (0.08)

    (0.08)

    Religion:Shia

    �0.60⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.56⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.33⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.29⇤

    ⇤⇤

    (0.18)

    (0.18)

    (0.09)

    (0.09)

    MainEarner

    0.06

    0.07

    0.01

    0.02

    (0.04)

    (0.04)

    (0.03)

    (0.02)

    Wea

    lthIndex

    �0.001

    0.001

    0.01

    0.001

    (0.01)

    (0.01)

    (0.005)

    (0.01)

    OccupationGov

    t0.01

    0.004

    0.02

    0.01

    (0.05)

    (0.05)

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    Constant

    1.33⇤

    ⇤⇤2.21⇤⇤

    ⇤2.13⇤⇤

    ⇤0.23⇤⇤

    ⇤0.66⇤⇤

    ⇤0.69⇤⇤

    (0.03)

    (0.17)

    (0.17)

    (0.02)

    (0.08)

    (0.09)

    IndividualCov

    ariates

    No

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    Yes

    Yes

    Constituen

    cyFixed

    E↵ects

    No

    No

    Yes

    No

    No

    Yes

    Observations

    2,520

    2,516

    2,516

    2,520

    2,516

    2,516

    ResidualStd

    .Error

    0.61

    0.59

    0.59

    0.42

    0.41

    0.41

    ⇤⇤p<0.05,

    ⇤⇤⇤p<0.01(two-tailed

    ).Robust

    stan

    dard

    errors

    inparenth

    eses.

    All

    regressionsincludedummiesfortrea

    tmen

    tassignmen

    twith

    theco

    ntrolgroup

    beingth

    ereference

    category.

    5

  • Table

    A8:Observed

    Correlation

    betweenSelf-Rep

    ortedViolence

    Exp

    osure

    andIdentification

    :Part2/4

    Kash

    mir

    Statu

    s:Rem

    ain

    inIndia

    (1/0)

    India/Pakistan:PreferIndia

    (1/0)

    Donationto

    IndianNGO

    (0-100)

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    (5)

    (6)

    (7)

    (8)

    (9)

    Violence

    Exposure

    �0.09⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.09⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.06⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.07⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.08⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.04

    �1.11

    �0.96

    �2.19

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (1.33)

    (1.34)

    (1.32)

    Age

    :18

    -27

    �0.05

    �0.06⇤⇤

    �0.06

    �0.08⇤⇤

    1.45

    1.38

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (0.04)

    (0.03)

    (2.03)

    (1.98)

    Age

    :28

    -49

    �0.04

    �0.04

    �0.06⇤⇤

    �0.07⇤⇤

    0.82

    1.31

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (1.64)

    (1.58)

    Gen

    der:Fem

    ale

    �0.03

    �0.02

    �0.02

    0.0002

    4.20⇤

    ⇤2.92

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (1.74)

    (1.72)

    >=HighSch

    ool

    �0.01

    0.01

    0.02

    0.04

    1.85

    1.34

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (1.85)

    (1.80)

    Religion:Sunni

    �0.34⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.35⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.36⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.40⇤⇤

    ⇤�5.48

    �3.96

    (0.08)

    (0.08)

    (0.04)

    (0.06)

    (5.53)

    (5.48)

    Religion:Shia

    �0.14

    �0.19

    �0.06

    �0.14⇤⇤

    0.06

    5.22

    (0.09)

    (0.10)

    (0.05)

    (0.07)

    (6.10)

    (6.16)

    MainEarner

    0.03

    0.03

    0.06

    0.06

    3.62

    3.00

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (1.91)

    (1.87)

    Wea

    lthIndex

    �0.005

    �0.003

    �0.01

    �0.01

    0.51

    2.01⇤⇤

    (0.01)

    (0.01)

    (0.01)

    (0.01)

    (0.36)

    (0.40)

    OccupationGov

    t0.01

    0.005

    0.15⇤

    ⇤⇤0.14⇤⇤

    ⇤0.07

    �0.08

    (0.04)

    (0.04)

    (0.04)

    (0.04)

    (2.62)

    (2.57)

    Constant

    0.33⇤

    ⇤⇤0.69⇤⇤

    ⇤0.56⇤⇤

    ⇤0.64⇤⇤

    ⇤1.00⇤⇤

    ⇤0.95⇤⇤

    ⇤26.02⇤

    ⇤⇤26.61⇤

    ⇤⇤3.51

    (0.02)

    (0.09)

    (0.10)

    (0.03)

    (0.06)

    (0.09)

    (1.61)

    (5.85)

    (6.07)

    IndividualCov

    ariates

    No

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    Yes

    Yes

    Constituen

    cyFixed

    E↵ects

    No

    No

    Yes

    No

    No

    Yes

    No

    No

    Yes

    Observations

    2,379

    2,375

    2,375

    1,739

    1,737

    1,737

    2,520

    2,516

    2,516

    ResidualStd

    .Error

    0.44

    0.44

    0.43

    0.49

    0.48

    0.47

    32.91

    32.81

    31.65

    ⇤⇤p<0.05,

    ⇤⇤⇤p<0.01(two-tailed

    ).Robust

    stan

    dard

    errors

    inparenth

    eses.

    All

    regressionsincludedummiesfortrea

    tmen

    tassignmen

    twith

    theco

    ntrolgroup

    beingth

    ereference

    category.

    6

  • Table

    A9:Observed

    Correlation

    betweenSelf-Rep

    ortedViolence

    Exp

    osure

    andIdentification

    :Part3/4

    National

    Iden

    tifica

    tion

    Index

    INational

    Iden

    tifica

    tion

    Index

    II

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    (5)

    (6)

    Violence

    Exposure

    �0.12⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.13⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.09⇤

    ⇤�0.14⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.14⇤

    ⇤⇤�0.09

    (0.04)

    (0.04)

    (0.04)

    (0.05)

    (0.05)

    (0.05)

    Age

    :18

    -27

    0.02

    0.01

    �0.04

    �0.04

    (0.06)

    (0.06)

    (0.07)

    (0.07)

    Age

    :28

    -49

    �0.07

    �0.05

    �0.10

    �0.08

    (0.05)

    (0.05)

    (0.06)

    (0.06)

    Gen

    der:Fem

    ale

    0.002

    �0.01

    �0.02

    �0.01

    (0.05)

    (0.05)

    (0.06)

    (0.06)

    >=HighSch

    ool

    0.04

    0.05

    0.10

    0.11

    (0.05)

    (0.05)

    (0.06)

    (0.06)

    Religion:Sunni

    �1.41⇤⇤

    ⇤�1.35⇤⇤

    ⇤�1.19⇤

    ⇤⇤�1.20⇤⇤

    (0.19)

    (0.19)

    (0.19)

    (0.19)

    Religion:Shia

    �0.85⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.74⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.59⇤

    ⇤⇤�0.58⇤⇤

    (0.21)

    (0.22)

    (0.21)

    (0.21)

    MainEarner

    0.12

    ⇤⇤0.13⇤⇤

    0.14⇤⇤

    0.16⇤⇤

    (0.06)

    (0.06)

    (0.07)

    (0.07)

    Wea

    lthIndex

    0.01

    0.03

    ⇤⇤�0.02

    0.001

    (0.01)

    (0.01)

    (0.01)

    (0.01)

    OccupationGov

    t0.03

    0.004

    0.12

    0.11

    (0.08)

    (0.08)

    (0.09)

    (0.09)

    Constant

    0.08

    1.40⇤

    ⇤⇤0.93⇤⇤

    ⇤0.28⇤⇤

    ⇤1.39⇤⇤

    ⇤0.80⇤⇤

    (0.05)

    (0.21)

    (0.22)

    (0.06)

    (0.21)

    (0.23)

    IndividualCov

    ariates

    No

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    Yes

    Yes

    Constituen

    cyFixed

    E↵ects

    No

    No

    Yes

    No

    No

    Yes

    Observations

    2,377

    2,373

    2,373

    1,724

    1,722

    1,722

    ResidualStd

    .Error

    0.97

    0.94

    0.91

    0.98

    0.95

    0.93

    ⇤⇤p<0.05,

    ⇤⇤⇤p<0.01(two-tailed

    ).Robust

    stan

    dard

    errors

    inparenth

    eses.

    All

    regressionsincludedummiesfortrea

    tmen

    tassignmen

    twith

    theco

    ntrolgroup

    beingth

    ereference

    category.

    7

  • Table

    A10:Observed

    Correlation

    betweenSelf-Rep

    ortedViolence

    Exp

    osure

    andIdentification

    :Part4/4

    Pea

    cefulProtest

    Participation(1-5)

    ViolentProtest

    Endorsem

    ent(1-5)

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    (5)

    (6)

    Violence

    Exposure

    0.29

    ⇤⇤⇤

    0.26⇤⇤

    ⇤0.32⇤⇤

    ⇤0.25⇤⇤

    ⇤0.26⇤⇤

    ⇤0.16⇤⇤

    (0.05)

    (0.05)

    (0.05)

    (0.07)

    (0.07)

    (0.07)

    Age

    :18

    -27

    0.09

    0.06

    0.03

    �0.04

    (0.08)

    (0.08)

    (0.10)

    (0.10)

    Age

    :28

    -49

    0.12

    0.12

    0.03

    0.04

    (0.07)

    (0.07)

    (0.09)

    (0.08)

    Gen

    der:Fem

    ale

    �0.09

    �0.06

    0.03

    �0.03

    (0.07)

    (0.07)

    (0.09)

    (0.09)

    >=HighSch

    ool

    0.10

    0.12

    0.21⇤

    ⇤0.19⇤⇤

    (0.07)

    (0.07)

    (0.09)

    (0.09)

    Religion:Sunni

    0.08

    0.04

    0.04

    �0.14

    (0.20)

    (0.21)

    (0.29)

    (0.27)

    Religion:Shia

    �0.01

    �0.12

    0.02

    �0.14

    (0.23)

    (0.24)

    (0.32)

    (0.32)

    MainEarner

    �0.002

    �0.01

    0.18

    0.10

    (0.07)

    (0.07)

    (0.10)

    (0.10)

    Wea

    lthIndex

    0.04

    ⇤⇤⇤

    0.01

    �0.05⇤⇤

    ⇤0.01

    (0.01)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    OccupationGov

    t�0.07

    �0.10

    �0.07

    �0.14

    (0.10)

    (0.10)

    (0.13)

    (0.13)

    Constant

    3.97⇤

    ⇤⇤3.86⇤⇤

    ⇤4.42⇤⇤

    ⇤2.74⇤⇤

    ⇤2.55⇤⇤

    ⇤2.53⇤⇤

    (0.06)

    (0.23)

    (0.25)

    (0.08)

    (0.31)

    (0.34)

    IndividualCov

    ariates

    No

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    Yes

    Yes

    Constituen

    cyFixed

    E↵ects

    No

    No

    Yes

    No

    No

    Yes

    Observations

    2,443

    2,440

    2,440

    2,44

    92,446

    2,446

    ResidualStd

    .Error

    1.27

    1.27

    1.24

    1.68

    1.67

    1.58

    ⇤⇤p<0.05,

    ⇤⇤⇤p<0.01(two-tailed

    ).Robust

    stan

    dard

    errors

    inparenth

    eses.

    All

    regressionsincludedummiesfortrea

    tmen

    tassignmen

    twith

    theco

    ntrolgroup

    beingth

    ereference

    category.

    8

  • Table

    A11:Correlation

    betweenSelf-identification

    andPreferences(C

    ontrol

    GroupRespon

    dents)

    OLS

    OLS

    OLS

    OLS

    OLS

    Kash

    mir

    Statu

    sIndia

    (1/0)

    Ind-P

    ak:PreferIndia

    (1/0)

    Donation:India

    (%)

    Pea

    cefulProtests(1-5)

    ViolentProtests(1-5)

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    (5)

    (6)

    (7)

    (8)

    (9)

    (10)

    Iden

    tity

    IndianorIndianandKash

    miri(1/0)

    0.23⇤

    ⇤⇤0.23⇤⇤

    ⇤5.75

    0.27⇤⇤

    0.32

    (0.05)

    (0.05)

    (3.48)

    (0.13)

    (0.19)

    Ranke

    dIndianIden

    tity

    (1-4)

    0.14⇤

    ⇤⇤0.11⇤⇤

    ⇤6.01⇤⇤

    ⇤�0.17

    0.04

    (0.04)

    (0.03)

    (2.13)

    (0.10)

    (0.12)

    Constant

    0.24⇤

    ⇤⇤0.11⇤⇤

    0.55⇤⇤

    ⇤0.47⇤⇤

    ⇤24.25⇤

    ⇤⇤17.75⇤

    ⇤⇤4.05⇤⇤

    ⇤4.32⇤⇤

    ⇤2.78⇤⇤

    ⇤2.80⇤

    ⇤⇤

    (0.02)

    (0.05)

    (0.03)

    (0.05)

    (1.67)

    (3.16)

    (0.07)

    (0.14)

    (0.09)

    (0.17)

    Observations

    466

    466

    360

    360

    501

    501

    485

    485

    486

    486

    ResidualStd

    .Error

    0.45

    0.45

    0.48

    0.48

    32.84

    32.70

    1.25

    1.25

    1.68

    1.69

    ⇤⇤p<0.05,⇤⇤

    ⇤p<0.01(two-tailed

    ).Robust

    standard

    errors

    inparenth

    eses.

    9

  • Table

    A12:RefusalRates

    byTreatmentCon

    dition

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    (5)

    (6)

    (7)

    (8)

    (9)

    Violence

    Exp

    osure

    0.00

    010.00

    2�0.02

    00.02

    40.00

    01�0.02

    00.02

    2�0.00

    1�0.00

    3(0.003

    )(0.006

    )(0.015

    )(0.029

    )(0.003

    )(0.015

    )(0.029

    )(0.011

    )(0.011

    )Econom

    icGrowth

    �0.00

    20.00

    010.00

    70.05

    5�0.00

    20.00

    50.06

    10.00

    5�0.00

    2(0.002

    )(0.007

    )(0.020

    )(0.036

    )(0.002

    )(0.021

    )(0.036

    )(0.014

    )(0.013

    )Econom

    icGrowth

    +Violence

    �0.00

    20.00

    5�0.04

    1⇤⇤

    0.03

    6�0.00

    2�0.04

    3⇤⇤⇤

    0.03

    0�0.01

    9�0.00

    9(0.002

    )(0.008

    )(0.016

    )(0.036

    )(0.002

    )(0.016

    )(0.036

    )(0.011

    )(0.012

    )IntegrativeInstitution

    s�0.00

    2�0.00

    40.00

    40.02

    8�0.00

    20.00

    30.03

    70.01

    90.00

    9(0.002

    )(0.006

    )(0.020

    )(0.035

    )(0.002

    )(0.020

    )(0.036

    )(0.016

    )(0.014

    )IntegrativeInstitution

    s+

    Violence

    �0.00

    2�0.00

    1�0.02

    60.05

    5�0.00

    2�0.02

    80.05

    30.00

    80.01

    0(0.002

    )(0.007

    )(0.017

    )(0.035

    )(0.002

    )(0.017

    )(0.035

    )(0.014

    )(0.014

    )Geograp

    hic

    Priming

    �0.00

    2�0.00

    4�0.01

    80.06

    0�0.00

    2�0.02

    00.05

    5�0.01

    6�0.01

    4(0.002

    )(0.006

    )(0.018

    )(0.036

    )(0.002

    )(0.018

    )(0.036

    )(0.011

    )(0.011

    )Geograp

    hic

    Priming+

    Violence

    �0.00

    2�0.00

    8⇤⇤

    �0.01

    90.01

    4�0.00

    2�0.02

    10.01

    5�0.00

    3�0.00

    1(0.002

    )(0.004

    )(0.017

    )(0.034

    )(0.002

    )(0.018

    )(0.034

    )(0.013

    )(0.013

    )Con

    stan

    t(C

    ontrol

    GroupMean)

    0.00

    20.00

    8⇤⇤

    0.07

    0⇤⇤⇤

    0.28

    1⇤⇤⇤

    0.00

    20.07

    2⇤⇤⇤

    0.28

    7⇤⇤⇤

    0.03

    2⇤⇤⇤

    0.03

    0⇤⇤⇤

    (0.002

    )(0.004

    )(0.011

    )(0.020

    )(0.002

    )(0.012

    )(0.020

    )(0.008

    )(0.008

    )

    Observations

    2,52

    22,52

    22,52

    22,52

    22,52

    22,52

    22,52

    22,52

    22,52

    2Residual

    Std.Error

    0.02

    80.08

    40.23

    10.46

    30.02

    80.23

    30.46

    50.17

    40.16

    8

    ⇤⇤p<0.05

    ,⇤⇤

    ⇤ p<0.01

    (two-tailed

    ).Rob

    ust

    stan

    darderrors

    inparentheses.

    10

  • FigureA8:HeterogeneousE↵ects

    ofViolence

    Exp

    osure

    byEducation

    Level

    Note:

    Figuresplotproportion

    san

    dmeansalon

    gwith95%

    confidence

    intervals.

    Circles

    plotmeansan

    dproportion

    sforlow

    education

    respon

    dents

    (<highschoo

    leducation

    )an

    dtriangles

    plotmeansan

    dproportion

    sforhigheducation

    respon

    dents

    (�highschoo

    leducation

    )

    11

  • FigureA9:HeterogeneousE↵ects

    ofViolence

    Exp

    osure

    byBaseline(C

    ontrol

    Group)National

    Identification

    inCon

    stituency

    Note:

    Figuresplotproportion

    san

    dmeansalon

    gwith95%

    confidence

    intervals.

    Circles

    plotmeansan

    dproportion

    sforrespon

    -dents

    from

    lownational

    identification

    constituencies

    andtriangles

    plotmeansan

    dproportion

    sforrespon

    dents

    from

    high(above

    median)national

    identification

    constituencies

    12

  • Table A13: Heterogeneous Treatment E↵ects of Violence Exposure on National Identifica-tion Index (Benjamini-Hochberg Adjusted p-values)

    Violence Exposure 0.58 (0.34)p = 0.27

    Age Above Median 0.08 (0.09)p = 0.73

    Female 0.06 (0.12)p = 0.98

    Completed High School 0.39 (0.11)⇤⇤⇤

    p = 0.01Sunni Muslim �0.46 (0.19)

    p = 0.08Main Earner 0.15 (0.13)

    p = 0.54Income and Wealth Above Median 0.001 (0.09)

    p = 1.00Government Occupation �0.06 (0.18)

    p = 0.99Constituency National Identification Above Median 0.56 (0.09)⇤⇤⇤

    p = 0.00Age x Violence �0.05 (0.13)

    p = 0.99Female x Violence �0.09 (0.16)

    p = 0.98High School x Violence �0.51 (0.15)⇤⇤⇤

    p = 0.01Sunni Muslim x Violence �0.40 (0.30)

    p = 0.49Main Earner x Violence �0.02 (0.18)

    p = 0.99Income and Wealth x Violence 0.02 (0.13)

    p = 0.99Government Occupation x Violence 0.02 (0.23)

    p = 0.99Constituency National Identification x Violence �0.29 (0.12)

    p = 0.08Constant �0.06 (0.21)

    p = 0.99

    Observations 918Residual Std. Error 0.92

    ⇤⇤p

  • Table

    A14:SplitSam

    ple

    Tests

    ofHeterogeneousTreatmentE↵ects

    ofViolence

    Exp

    osure

    onNational

    Identification

    Index

    (Benjamini-Hochb

    ergAdjusted

    p-values)

    DummyVariable

    takingvalues

    1/0

    CATE

    (1)

    CATE

    (0)

    Di↵.p-val.

    Di↵.p-val.(B

    Had

    j.)

    Con

    trol

    Mean(1)

    Con

    trol

    Mean(0)

    Age

    AboveMedian

    -0.18(0.09)

    -0.12(0.09)

    0.68

    0.97

    0.08

    -0.03

    Fem

    ale

    -0.15(0.09)

    -0.15(0.09)

    0.97

    0.97

    -0.01

    0.05

    Com

    pletedHighSchoo

    l-0.50(0.13)

    -0.03(0.07)

    0.00

    0.01

    0.23

    -0.06

    SunniMuslim

    -0.17(0.06)

    0.22

    (0.30)

    0.12

    0.31

    -0.01

    0.51

    MainEarner

    -0.13(0.12)

    -0.16(0.07)

    0.83

    0.97

    0.09

    -0.01

    Incomean

    dWealthAboveMedian

    -0.20(0.09)

    -0.11(0.09)

    0.49

    0.97

    0.04

    0.01

    GovernmentOccupation

    -0.19(0.23)

    -0.15(0.07)

    0.84

    0.97

    0.07

    0.02

    Con

    stituency

    National

    IDAboveMedian

    -0.27(0.10)

    -0.02(0.07)

    0.05

    0.19

    0.30

    -0.27

    14

  • Table A15: Heterogeneous Treatment E↵ects of Violence Exposure on Protest Index

    (1) (2) (3)

    Violence Exposure �0.15⇤⇤ �0.14⇤⇤ �0.52(0.07) (0.07) (0.31)

    Age Above Median �0.03 �0.13(0.07) (0.10)

    Female 0.09 0.09(0.09) (0.13)

    Completed High School 0.19⇤⇤ 0.27⇤⇤

    (0.08) (0.11)Sunni Muslim �0.07 �0.20

    (0.13) (0.17)Main Earner 0.12 0.16

    (0.10) (0.14)Income and Wealth Above Median 0.06 �0.01

    (0.07) (0.10)Government Occupation �0.17 �0.24

    (0.12) (0.18)Constituency National Identification Above Median �0.04 �0.05

    (0.07) (0.09)Age x Violence 0.18

    (0.14)Female x Violence 0.01

    (0.18)High School x Violence �0.18

    (0.16)Sunni Muslim x Violence 0.26

    (0.25)Main Earner x Violence �0.10

    (0.20)Income and Wealth x Violence 0.17

    (0.14)Government Occupation x Violence 0.15

    (0.24)Constituency National Identification x Violence 0.04

    (0.14)Constant 0.11⇤⇤ 0.06 0.24

    (0.05) (0.16) (0.22)

    Observations 944 943 943Residual Std. Error 1.02 1.02 1.02

    ⇤⇤p

  • Table A16: Heterogeneous Treatment E↵ects of Violence Exposure on Identification Index(Principal Components)

    (1) (2) (3)

    Violence Exposure �0.18⇤⇤ �0.15⇤⇤ 0.65(0.08) (0.08) (0.43)

    Age Above Median 0.10 0.13(0.08) (0.11)

    Female �0.10 �0.10(0.10) (0.15)

    Completed High School 0.15 0.42⇤⇤⇤

    (0.10) (0.15)Sunni Muslim �0.86⇤⇤⇤ �0.61⇤⇤

    (0.19) (0.25)Main Earner 0.14 0.09

    (0.12) (0.16)Income and Wealth Above Median �0.04 �0.08

    (0.08) (0.12)Government Occupation �0.02 0.01

    (0.15) (0.23)Constituency National Identification Above Median 0.56⇤⇤⇤ 0.71⇤⇤⇤

    (0.08) (0.11)Age x Violence �0.06

    (0.16)Female x Violence 0.01

    (0.21)High School x Violence �0.57⇤⇤⇤

    (0.19)Sunni Muslim x Violence �0.58

    (0.39)Main Earner x Violence 0.09

    (0.23)Income and Wealth x Violence 0.07

    (0.16)Government Occupation x Violence �0.02

    (0.30)Constituency National Identification x Violence �0.31⇤⇤

    (0.16)Constant 0.06 0.48⇤⇤ 0.13

    (0.06) (0.21) (0.28)

    Observations 920 918 918Residual Std. Error 1.21 1.15 1.15

    ⇤⇤p

  • Table A17: Heterogeneous Treatment E↵ects of Violence Exposure on Identification Index(Standardized Z)

    (1) (2) (3)

    Violence Exposure �0.08⇤⇤ �0.07⇤⇤ 0.40⇤⇤(0.04) (0.04) (0.20)

    Age Above Median 0.04 0.06(0.04) (0.05)

    Female 0.02 0.07(0.05) (0.07)

    Completed High School 0.10⇤⇤ 0.24⇤⇤⇤

    (0.05) (0.07)Sunni Muslim �0.38⇤⇤⇤ �0.26⇤⇤

    (0.09) (0.12)Main Earner 0.10 0.09

    (0.06) (0.08)Income and Wealth Above Median 0.01 �0.01

    (0.04) (0.06)Government Occupation �0.02 �0.03

    (0.07) (0.11)Constituency National Identification Above Median 0.25⇤⇤⇤ 0.34⇤⇤⇤

    (0.04) (0.05)Age x Violence �0.04

    (0.08)Female x Violence �0.10

    (0.10)High School x Violence �0.31⇤⇤⇤

    (0.09)Sunni Muslim x Violence �0.27

    (0.18)Main Earner x Violence 0.01

    (0.11)Income and Wealth x Violence 0.02

    (0.08)Government Occupation x Violence 0.05

    (0.14)Constituency National Identification x Violence �0.20⇤⇤⇤

    (0.07)Constant �0.002 0.13 �0.08

    (0.03) (0.10) (0.13)

    Observations 981 979 979Residual Std. Error 0.60 0.58 0.57

    ⇤⇤p

  • Table A18: Heterogeneous Treatment E↵ects of Violence Exposure on Index of NationalIdentification Excluding Questions on Kashmirs Political Future and India-Pakistan Prefer-ence

    (1) (2) (3)

    Violence Exposure �0.13⇤⇤ �0.12⇤⇤ 0.48(0.06) (0.06) (0.33)

    Age Above Median 0.05 0.06(0.06) (0.09)

    Female 0.06 0.08(0.08) (0.12)

    Completed High School 0.20⇤⇤ 0.46⇤⇤⇤

    (0.08) (0.11)Sunni Muslim �0.49⇤⇤⇤ �0.31

    (0.15) (0.20)Main Earner 0.11 0.08

    (0.09) (0.13)Income and Wealth Above Median 0.06 0.02

    (0.06) (0.09)Government Occupation �0.11 �0.15

    (0.11) (0.16)Constituency National Identification Above Median 0.35⇤⇤⇤ 0.46⇤⇤⇤

    (0.06) (0.09)Age x Violence �0.03

    (0.12)Female x Violence �0.05

    (0.16)High School x Violence �0.57⇤⇤⇤

    (0.15)Sunni Muslim x Violence �0.39

    (0.30)Main Earner x Violence 0.05

    (0.18)Income and Wealth x Violence 0.08

    (0.13)Government Occupation x Violence 0.13

    (0.22)Constituency National Identification x Violence �0.24⇤⇤

    (0.12)Constant 0.003 0.11 �0.15

    (0.04) (0.16) (0.22)

    Observations 979 977 977Residual Std. Error 0.96 0.93 0.93

    ⇤⇤p

  • Table

    A19:Average

    TreatmentE↵ects:AllGroups

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    (5)

    (6)

    (7)

    (8)

    (9)

    Violence

    Exp

    osure

    �0.06

    �0.04

    �0.04

    �0.09

    ⇤⇤�2.72

    �0.15

    ⇤⇤�0.21

    ⇤⇤⇤

    �0.20

    ⇤⇤�0.12

    (0.04)

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (0.04)

    (2.04)

    (0.06)

    (0.07)

    (0.09)

    (0.11)

    Econom

    icGrowth

    �0.01

    �0.00

    3�0.05

    �0.02

    0.89

    �0.04

    �0.05

    0.01

    �0.14

    (0.05)

    (0.03)

    (0.04)

    (0.05)

    (2.61)

    (0.08)

    (0.09)

    (0.10)

    (0.13)

    Econom

    icGrowth

    +Violence

    �0.02

    0.02

    �0.06

    �0.02

    0.24

    �0.06

    �0.04

    0.01

    �0.15

    (0.05)

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (0.05)

    (2.66)

    (0.08)

    (0.10)

    (0.10)

    (0.13)

    IntegrativeInstitution

    s�0.03

    0.04

    �0.00

    010.06

    �0.63

    �0.02

    �0.00

    10.15

    �0.01

    (0.05)

    (0.03)

    (0.04)

    (0.04)

    (2.51)

    (0.08)

    (0.09)

    (0.10)

    (0.14)

    IntegrativeInstitution

    s+

    Violence

    �0.03

    �0.02

    �0.01

    �0.02

    2.30

    �0.02

    �0.04

    0.18

    ⇤⇤�0.02

    (0.05)

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (0.04)

    (2.58)

    (0.08)

    (0.09)

    (0.09)

    (0.13)

    Com

    mon

    Geograp

    hy�0.06

    �0.01

    0.02

    0.01

    1.68

    �0.05

    �0.08

    �0.01

    0.01

    (0.04)

    (0.03)

    (0.04)

    (0.05)

    (2.62)

    (0.08)

    (0.09)

    (0.10)

    (0.13)

    Com

    mon

    Geograp

    hy+

    Violence

    �0.07

    0.04

    �0.01

    �0.04

    �1.26

    �0.04

    �0.10

    �0.05

    �0.16

    (0.05)

    (0.03)

    (0.03)

    (0.04)

    (2.37)

    (0.07)

    (0.09)

    (0.10)

    (0.13)

    Con

    stan

    t(C

    ontrol

    GroupMean)

    1.30

    ⇤⇤⇤

    0.23

    ⇤⇤⇤

    0.29

    ⇤⇤⇤

    0.61

    ⇤⇤⇤

    25.55⇤

    ⇤⇤0.03

    0.22

    ⇤⇤⇤

    4.10

    ⇤⇤⇤

    2.85

    ⇤⇤⇤

    (0.03)

    (0.02)

    (0.02)

    (0.03)

    (1.47)

    (0.05)

    (0.05)

    (0.06)

    (0.08)

    Observations

    2,52

    02,52

    02,37

    91,73

    92,52

    02,37

    71,72

    42,44

    32,44

    9Residual

    Std.Error

    0.61

    0.42

    0.45

    0.49

    32.91

    0.97

    0.98

    1.28

    1.68

    ⇤⇤p<0.05

    ,⇤⇤

    ⇤ p<0.01

    (two-tailed

    ).Rob

    ust

    stan

    darderrors

    inparentheses.

    (1)Ran

    kOrderingof

    SocialIdentities:Ran

    kof

    Indianidentity

    (1-4)withhigher

    values

    indicatinggreaternational

    identification

    .(2)Self-Identification

    :Respon

    dentsees

    herselfas

    “IndianOnly”or

    “Indianan

    dKashmiri”

    (1)or

    “KashmiriOnly”(0)

    (3)KashmirsPolitical

    Status:

    Kashmir

    shou

    ldremainwithIndia

    (1)rather

    than

    becom

    ingindep

    endentor

    joiningPak

    istan(0)(4)

    India-Pak

    istanPreference:Ifindep

    enden

    ceis

    not

    anop

    tion

    ,shou

    ldKashmir

    remainwithIndia

    (1)or

    join

    Pak

    istan(0)

    (5)Beh

    avioralMeasure

    ofIdentification

    :Allocationto

    all-India

    NGO

    (%)rather

    than

    NGO

    workingon

    lyin

    Kashmir.

    (6)Index

    ofNational

    Identification

    I:(excludingIndia-Pak

    istanpreference)

    (7)Index

    ofNational

    Identification

    II:(includingIndia-Pak

    istanpreference)

    (8)Participationin

    PeacefulProtests:

    Statedwillingn

    essto

    participatein

    peacefulprotestsag

    ainst

    theIndiangovernment(1-5)

    (9)SupportforViolence:Endorsementof

    violen

    ceag

    ainst

    theIndiangovernment(1-5)

    19

  • We compute minimum detectable e↵ect sizes for each outcome variable. The minimum de-tectable e↵ect size (MDE) is the smallest e↵ect that, if true, has a given chance of producing anestimate of the treatment e↵ect that is statistically significant at a given level. Here we computeMDEs based on assuming that the observed variance in the outcome in the sample of control grouprespondents is equal to the population variance, with ↵ = 0.05 and � = 0.80 according to thefollowing formula adapted from Duflo et al. (2007)72:

    MDE = (t(1�K) + t↵/2) ⇤

    s1

    P (1� P )

    r�2

    N(6)

    Where, t↵ is the critical value for the probability that the null hypothesis H0 is rejected whenit is false and t1�K is the critical value needed to achieve a power of K (0.84 for a 80% power forinstance). P is the fraction of subjects allocated to the treatment group (0.5 if respondents areassigned with equal probability to the treatment and control condition), � is the standard deviationof the treatment e↵ect (di↵erence in means or proportions), and N is the sample size. The formulawe use for the power calculations is thus given by:

    MDE = (0.84 + 1.96) ⇤ 2 ⇤ SE (7)

    and estimate the standard error of means and proportions using the following formula (assumingequal variance in control and treatment conditions, a sample size of 1000, and half the respondentsassigned to control and treatment conditions, respectively).

    SE =q(s2C/nC) + ((s

    2T /nT )) (8)

    Table A20: Power Analysis

    Variable Control Mean Control Var. SE MDERanked Indian Identity (Reversed 1-4) 1.3 0.41 0.04 0.23

    Indian or Indian+Kashmiri/Kashmiri (1/0) 0.23 0.18 0.03 0.15Donation to All-India NGO (Percent) 25.55 1081.95 2.08 11.65Kashmir remain Part of India (1/0) 0.29 0.21 0.03 0.16India/Pakistan: Prefer India (1/0) 0.61 0.24 0.03 0.17

    National Identification Index 0.03 1 0.06 0.35Peaceful Protest Participation (1-5) 4.1 1.59 0.08 0.45Violent Protest Endorsement (1-5) 2.85 2.85 0.11 0.6

    72Esther Duflo, Rachel Glennerster, and Michael Kremer. Using randomization in devel- opment economicsresearch: A toolkit. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 6059. Center for Economic Policy Research, 2007.

    20