1
| Army's Fight With Space Agency W ut to President in Crucial Meeting By WILLIAMHINES Star BUS Writer The "battle of Huntsville’’—now hardly more than a desperate rear-guard action—heads into Its crucial phase etoday. » The new Space Council was scheduled to hold the second' meting of Its brief life to discuss with President Elsen- hower. its chairman, a proposal by the National Aeronautics I INTERPRETIVE REPORT > j the final retreat to Appomattox, , the Army is not really hoping ; for victory; rather. It wants to , delay defeat a little, r Defeat, in the present case, i would be the freeze-out of the and Space Administration to take over certain Army space activities. The Army, asserting what amounts to squatters' rights over an Important sector of space research and develop- ment, la now openly battling for time. Like Lee’s troops on f *"* « ¦L\&a M J H/_ y - H '<¦ I Hill Murom I f '"I I Army from the burgeoning 1 space business. As 1946 sponsor of "Operation Paperclip’’—the i importation of Oerman scien- tists—the Arnjy witn some Jus- tification regards Itself as the United States pioneer In outer space. Understandably, the Army is loath to see Itself removed from the Interstellar picture at this time—or any other. For fully two weeks now, the Army has been fighting in the arena of public opinion to prevent removal of some of its most Important space elements. Because the new Space Agency has refused to get Into the ring and slug, the battle to date has looked very much like a shadow- boxing session. But it has been a very real battle nevertheless, and to a degree has been fruitful for the Army. Few Knew Story As nearly as can be deter- mined, the Army managed only last week to undo a decision that had been made. The likeli- hood that the decision will be. reaffirmed in the next month or six weeks does little or noth- ing to detract from the bril- liance of Army maneuvering. Because of a White House- Imposed gag on public discus- sion of the NASA-Army con- troversy, few outside the Space Council know the nature of the NASA proposition or the reasons it was put forward. Briefly, this is what NASA wants, and why: It seeks to take over the Army’s Jet Propulsion Labora- tory, operated at California Tech In Pasadena, Calif., as a quasi-civilian facility under. Dr. William H. Pickering, and the Army Ballistic Missile Agency, run as a military installation at Huntsville, Ala., under Brig. Gen. John A. Barkley. The reason for this raid on the Army’s space potential is that NASA needs three capa- bilities—as an operating out- fit—which it did not have in the old National Advisory Com- mittee on Aeronautics setup. Nearby Units Involved Capability No. 1 Is In the realm of space science—the basic research end Os astro- nautics. It has recently ac- quired this capability as a re- sult of the transfer of Dr. John P. Hagen and his Vanguard group from Navy control. Capability No. 2 is in elec- tronics and guidance. NASA—- as its present deputy admin- istrator, Hugh Dry den. testi- fied before Congress last year—- needs a "captive laboratory” to develop this complex and vital part of space hardware. The Jet Propulsion Lab is its first tar- get; NASA also has eyes for the Lincoln Lab at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Silver Spring. Capability No. 3 Is In "vehicle systems engineering.” Virtually the only governmental organi- zation that fills the bill from NASA’s point of view Is the Redstone operation usually known as the "Wemher von Braun team.” It is NASA’s position that these three capabilities—as in- tegral parts of the Space Agency’s organization—are es- sential If NASA is to carry out its mission of peaceful civilian activity beyond the atmosphere. Delays Forseen Any time table in connection with any phase of space activ- ity is extremely tenuous, but it would teem that if NASA had to start from scratch in creat- ing for itself Capabalities 2 and 3, it would take from three to five years. As It Is, the transi- tion of the existing Capabilities 2 and 3 from Army to NASA jurisdiction, if authorized by the President, will take from 18 months to two years. The Initial maneuver by NASA to get JPL and the Red- stone group seems to have been made at about the same time the Hagen team was transferred from the Navy, on NASA’s natal day of October 1. It is under- stood that a firm decision to transfer the other two activi- ties was agreed on by NASA and Defense Department offi- cials—without Army concur- rence—shortly after the first of the month. This left the Army without a voice in the Space Council, which was originally scheduled to meet the President yester- day—later set back 24 hours. From the Army point of view, other measures were required. These measures took the form of a leak to a military affairs reporter of the fact that NASA had tapped the Army for JPL and the Von Braun group. The leak brought the story out into the open, after which Army officials felt themselves entitled to answer questions and com- ment on public issues. Sincerity Stressed That this was not regarded by the White House as a proper way to do business is now con- ceded throughout the Govern- ment. While no one has yet un- dertaken to reprimand Lt. Gen. Arthur O. Trudeau, Army re- search and development chief, and MaJ. Gen. John B. Medaris, head of the Huntsville complex, for their public utterances, the best anyone has been able to come up with in their behalf has been the kind of faint praise that usually accompanies damnation. A knowledgable Army source, asked to Justify the generals' activities, pointed out that they | were both sincere and dedi- cated—attributes that it would ley under Gen. Medaris’ over- all command. Rebuttal to the rest of the Army’s case would entail in- volved argumentation which—- to date at least—those on the ! other sido have shunned. Onej more or less neutral observer pooh-poohed the Corps of En- gineers ‘‘civil functions” anal- ogy, just as others have hooted ;at Gen. Trudeau's assertion .that the Army’s role in space 'is to take and hold ground—- even lunar ground. There seems scant doubt that sooner or later the Acmy is go- ing to be out qf the space busi- ness Army strategy now aims at making lt "later” rather than “sooner.” One way—the best Immediate way—would be to drag feet until the end of the. year. After December 31, 1958. under the Space Act’s section 302(c), the President must report all proposed functional transfers to Congress and sub- mit the proposals for a possible Capitol Hill veto. The Army reasoning is that hardly seem necessary to cite , In the case of high Army ( officials. And Acting Defense Becre- \ tary Quarles uttered a mild comment in derogation of the generals’ statements. Duftng questioning on Mutual Broad- casting System's "Reporters Roundup" Sunday, Mr. Quarles was asked whether he thought the two were "out of line.” "Discussing this matter in public on its merits while it is under active consideration by the President is inappro- priate. To that extent, I say it was out of line," Mr. Quarles said. Voa Braun Provoked "But,” he added. "I must say it reflected the Army view-! point.” The Trudeau-Medaris state- ments came chiefly at the Army Association meeting here last week, although Gen. Me- daris had sounded off earlier in Chicago. Also, Dr. von Braun left no doubt about his own pique, and that of his "team,” at the NASA proposal. What the general and Dr. von Braun have said, both overtly and covertly, has been bolstered by behlnd-the-hand discussion in other Army quar- ters. The cumulative effect has been distinctly mindful of the “Op 23" scandal of 1949, when the Navy undertook —with justification, as it has turned out-—to criticize the Air Force B-36 program and incidentally to get In a few out-of-channels shafts against unification. The Army case now bolls down to this; Huntsville is a smoothly op- erating team, Integrated from top to bottom. Half of lt can’t be taken away without ruining the other half; the top can’t be skimmed off without leaving an ineffective, headless organiza- tion behind. * Furthermore—the Army case continues—the “Paperclip” sci- entists, liberated from postwar Germany and imported into the States like so many V-2 rockets, are a closely knit group who will not stand for being rent asunder. Rather than allow the Government to transfer them Indiscriminately about, they will quit Government service and avail themselves of some of the juicy industrial plums re- peatedly offered them. Civilian Corps Not Large Personnel and organizational considerations aside, the Army goes on, the Von Braun group complements what is being done in military weaponry; In- deed, less than 10 per cent—- “vastly less,” according to Gen. Medaris—of the work at Hunts- ville is civilian type space activity. And in any case, the Army continues, there is no reason why an activity should be taken away from the Army just be- cause lt is civilian in nature. The Corps of Engineers, as Gen. Medaris pointed out last week, "has done a highly creditable and successful job over a period of many years” in dam building on America’s great rivers and "I don’t know of anything war- like in building a dam.” More important, according to the Army, is the Nike-Zeus project now under way at Huntsville. In this antimissile missile development program lies America’s primary hope of shielding itself from a rain of nuclear death should war with Russia come. And finally, there is the mat- ter of squatter sovereignty. As Gen. Trudeau put it: “An agency which was foresighted enough 13 years ago to get the group of German scientists and to go into the missile field earlier than anybody else and develop a greater competency and demonstrated capability than anybody else” deserves a little better than what now seems to be in store for the Army. Problem Solvable In addition to all this, the Army officials say there is no reason why NASA can’t get its work done on a contract basis. Gen. Medaris said "we can put up another wicket at the gate” and take NASA work orders in- stead of breaking up the team. Supplementary to these more or less formal arguments are a welter of rumors. Three of them —that the Redstone team will be moved bodily away from Huntsville; that the NASA’s real reason for the Huntsville raid is that it wants Dr. von Braun as chief scientist of the new agency, and that after this coup the next NASA raid will be on the Air Force for the Cape Canaveral (Fla.) launch- ing facility—all can be cate- gorically denied. The Army case fares better under cursory than under de- tailed examination. The actual crux of the Army’s argument lies in what is being done at Huntsville for the national se- curity. These are the facts: The Jupiter Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile has been assigned to the Air Force for operations, and is out of Hunts- ville's hands. The 200-500 mile Pershing . solid-fueled, ground-to-ground tactical missile has been as- , signed to the Martin Co. for , research, development and pro- duction, and Huntsville retains only some monitoring respon- i sibility. ¦ Delaying Action Seen The Nike-Zeus project at Huntsville is under the Army Rocket and Guided Missile Agency commanded by Brig. Gen. John G. Shinkle, and not in the ken of the Von Braun ! team supervised by Gen. Bark- If an OK on the latest NASA proposal can be deferred for 63 days beyond the council meeting the plan will be tossed the Army's Congressional ! friends can block it. The only trouble with this reasoning—from a long range point of view—is that every- body would lose and nobm*y wpuld win by guch strategy. If i the NASA plan is deferred until 1959, NASA undoubtedly will give up as a lost cause any hope of absorbing going con- cerns. Willy-nilly, lt will set about the long, hard business of building from the ground up. Meanwhile, in a couple of years’ time, the Huntsville , group will find its military projects taken over by the Air Force under apparent present Pentagon policies of putting all space eggs in one basket. At length perhaps in 1961 ior 1962—the Von Brsun- Medaris operations would find ' themselves worked out of a job. And, as a team at least, they would have nowhere to go. For this and other reasons, all signs point to a White ADVERTISEMENT nflP’ S fl K&i Tv ¦ ft*. m THE EVENING STAR, WASHINGTON, D. C., WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1958 House decision in favor of NABA; not this week, probably, but in all likelihood within the next month or six weeks. ADVERTISEMENT PULL THE KEY ON 30-E ELECT JUDGE REEVES WASHINGTON DC. - LANGLEY PARK, MARYLAND : -i ' 'iBH (credit service charge includedi ‘Hal AA V JL--- EASY 2-speed, 2-cycle automatic washer f exclusive Easy Spiralator a two rinse water tempera- * twin time cycle selections roll-over washing action. tures, plus power-rinse, give a choice of settings rinses away suds and soil. for len 9 th of w « h, "9 ond three wash water temper- nniHig. atures give safe, gentle, two wash and two spin , variable load size selec- thorough washing of all speeds perfectly launder Hons automatically fill fabrics. all garments. > washer to correct level. $r gas range round up sale j new thrift purchase plan vj -/£ no down payment, up to 36 months to pay /1 , on your gas bill—pay only 7.21 per month I \ _ km jWWJ | o s 2O trade-in for your old range on a new I I TAPPMI 56 i/rwMy 234. 50 v - I matchless ¦ note \ ¦ 191 zLSO* | ' gas range H (HUB JL JL. installed / Rv ... .. / B Handsomely styled 1959 Tappan wi your o with all new milk-glass finished JHMgI lighted back the amaz- ing range with all the conveniences you want —set 'n' forget burners, 'MET 1 divided cooking top, huge storage pSg space, large oven with window and - light, lift-off oven door ond swing- —-SL. L out broiler—and it's budget priced visual** lift-off set *' foryct during Foil Range Roundup! •van door even deer burners •Price include/ normal intUSlation Lansburgh’s—WASHEßS AND RANGES—Washington, Sixth Floor; Langley Park, Lower Level shop early, shop late Thursday, both A-16

A-16 With W - Chronicling America

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A-16 With W - Chronicling America

| Army's Fight With Space AgencyWut to President in Crucial Meeting

By WILLIAMHINESStar BUS Writer

The "battle of Huntsville’’—now hardly more than adesperate rear-guard action—heads into Its crucial phase

etoday.» The new Space Council was scheduled to hold the second'meting of Its brief life to discuss with President Elsen-hower. its chairman, a proposal by the National Aeronautics

I INTERPRETIVE REPORT

> jthe final retreat to Appomattox,, the Army is not really hoping; for victory; rather. It wants to

, delay defeat a little,

r Defeat, in the present case,

i would be the freeze-out of the

and Space Administration totake over certain Army spaceactivities.

The Army, asserting whatamounts to squatters' rightsover an Important sector ofspace research and develop-ment, la now openly battlingfor time. Like Lee’s troops on

f *"* «

¦L\&a MJ

H/_ y - H ‘ '<¦ I

HillMurom I

f '"I I

Army from the burgeoning 1space business. As 1946 sponsorof "Operation Paperclip’’—the iimportation of Oerman scien-tists—the Arnjy witn some Jus-tification regards Itself as theUnited States pioneer In outerspace. Understandably, theArmy is loath to see Itselfremoved from the Interstellarpicture at this time—or anyother.

For fully two weeks now,the Army has been fighting inthe arena of public opinion toprevent removal of some of itsmost Important space elements.Because the new Space Agencyhas refused to get Into the ringand slug, the battle to date haslooked very much like a shadow-boxing session.

But it has been a very realbattle nevertheless, and to adegree has been fruitful for theArmy.

Few Knew Story

As nearly as can be deter-mined, the Army managed onlylast week to undo a decisionthat had been made. The likeli-hood that the decision will be.reaffirmed in the next monthor six weeks does little or noth-ing to detract from the bril-liance of Army maneuvering.

Because of a White House-Imposed gag on public discus-sion of the NASA-Army con-troversy, few outside the SpaceCouncil know the nature of theNASA proposition or the reasonsit was put forward.

Briefly, this is what NASAwants, and why:

It seeks to take over theArmy’s Jet Propulsion Labora-tory, operated at CaliforniaTech In Pasadena, Calif., as aquasi-civilian facility under. Dr.William H. Pickering, and theArmy Ballistic Missile Agency,run as a military installation atHuntsville, Ala., under Brig.Gen. John A. Barkley.

The reason for this raid onthe Army’s space potential isthat NASA needs three capa-

bilities—as an operating out-fit—which it did not have inthe old National Advisory Com-mittee on Aeronautics setup.

Nearby Units Involved

Capability No. 1 Is In therealm of space science—thebasic research end Os astro-nautics. It has recently ac-quired this capability as a re-sult of the transfer of Dr. JohnP. Hagen and his Vanguardgroup from Navy control.

Capability No. 2 is in elec-tronics and guidance. NASA—-as its present deputy admin-istrator, Hugh Dry den. testi-fied before Congress last year—-needs a "captive laboratory” todevelop this complex and vitalpart of space hardware. The JetPropulsion Lab is its first tar-get; NASA also has eyes for theLincoln Lab at MassachusettsInstitute of Technology and theJohns Hopkins Applied Physics

Silver Spring.

Capability No. 3 Is In "vehiclesystems engineering.” Virtuallythe only governmental organi-zation that fills the bill fromNASA’s point of view Is theRedstone operation usuallyknown as the "Wemher vonBraun team.”

It is NASA’s position thatthese three capabilities—as in-tegral parts of the SpaceAgency’s organization—are es-sential If NASA is to carry outits mission of peaceful civilianactivity beyond the atmosphere.

Delays Forseen ’

Any time table in connectionwith any phase of space activ-ity is extremely tenuous, but itwould teem that if NASA hadto start from scratch in creat-ing for itself Capabalities 2 and3, it would take from three tofive years. As It Is, the transi-tion of the existing Capabilities2 and 3 from Army to NASAjurisdiction, if authorized bythe President, will take from 18months to two years.

The Initial maneuver byNASA to get JPL and the Red-stone group seems to have beenmade at about the same timethe Hagen team was transferredfrom the Navy, on NASA’s natalday of October 1. It is under-stood that a firm decision totransfer the other two activi-ties was agreed on by NASAand Defense Department offi-cials—without Army concur-rence—shortly after the firstof the month.

This left the Army without avoice in the Space Council,which was originally scheduledto meet the President yester-day—later set back 24 hours.From the Army point of view,other measures were required.

These measures took the formof a leak to a military affairsreporter of the fact that NASAhad tapped the Army for JPLand the Von Braun group. Theleak brought the story out intothe open, after which Armyofficials felt themselves entitledto answer questions and com-ment on public issues.

Sincerity StressedThat this was not regarded

by the White House as a properway to do business is now con-ceded throughout the Govern-ment. While no one has yet un-dertaken to reprimand Lt. Gen.Arthur O. Trudeau, Army re-search and development chief,and MaJ. Gen. John B. Medaris,head of the Huntsville complex,for their public utterances, thebest anyone has been able tocome up with in their behalfhas been the kind of faintpraise that usually accompaniesdamnation.

A knowledgable Army source,asked to Justify the generals'activities, pointed out that they

| were both sincere and dedi-cated—attributes that it would

ley under Gen. Medaris’ over-all command.

Rebuttal to the rest of theArmy’s case would entail in-volved argumentation which—-to date at least—those on the !other sido have shunned. Onejmore or less neutral observerpooh-poohed the Corps of En-gineers ‘‘civil functions” anal-ogy, just as others have hooted;at Gen. Trudeau's assertion.that the Army’s role in space'is to take and hold ground—-even lunar ground.

There seems scant doubt thatsooner or later the Acmy is go-ing to be out qf the space busi-ness Army strategy now aimsat making lt "later” rather than“sooner.” One way—the bestImmediate way—would be todrag feet until the end of the.year. After December 31, 1958.under the Space Act’s section302(c), the President mustreport all proposed functionaltransfers to Congress and sub-mit the proposals for a possibleCapitol Hill veto.

The Army reasoning is that

hardly seem necessary to cite ,In the case of high Army (officials.

And Acting Defense Becre- \tary Quarles uttered a mildcomment in derogation of thegenerals’ statements. Duftngquestioning on Mutual Broad-casting System's "ReportersRoundup" Sunday, Mr. Quarleswas asked whether he thoughtthe two were "out of line.”

"Discussing this matter inpublic on its merits while itis under active considerationby the President is inappro-priate. To that extent, I sayit was out of line," Mr. Quarlessaid.

Voa Braun Provoked

"But,” he added. "I must sayit reflected the Army view-!point.”

The Trudeau-Medaris state-ments came chiefly at theArmy Association meeting herelast week, although Gen. Me-daris had sounded off earlierin Chicago. Also, Dr. von Braunleft no doubt about his ownpique, and that of his "team,”at the NASA proposal.

What the general and Dr.von Braun have said, bothovertly and covertly, has beenbolstered by behlnd-the-handdiscussion in other Army quar-ters. The cumulative effect hasbeen distinctly mindful of the“Op 23" scandal of 1949, whenthe Navy undertook —withjustification, as it has turnedout-—to criticize the Air ForceB-36 program and incidentallyto get In a few out-of-channelsshafts against unification.

The Army case now bollsdown to this;

Huntsville is a smoothly op-erating team, Integrated fromtop to bottom. Half of lt can’tbe taken away without ruiningthe other half; the top can’t beskimmed off without leaving anineffective, headless organiza-tion behind. *

Furthermore—the Army casecontinues—the “Paperclip” sci-entists, liberated from postwarGermany and imported into theStates like so many V-2 rockets,are a closely knit group whowill not stand for being rentasunder. Rather than allow theGovernment to transfer themIndiscriminately about, theywill quit Government serviceand avail themselves of some ofthe juicy industrial plums re-peatedly offered them.

Civilian Corps Not Large

Personnel and organizationalconsiderations aside, the Armygoes on, the Von Braun groupcomplements what is beingdone in military weaponry; In-deed, less than 10 per cent—-“vastly less,” according to Gen.Medaris—of the work at Hunts-ville is civilian • type spaceactivity.

And in any case, the Armycontinues, there is no reasonwhy an activity should be takenaway from the Army just be-cause lt is civilian in nature.The Corps of Engineers, as Gen.Medaris pointed out last week,"has done a highly creditableand successful job over a periodof many years” in dam buildingon America’s great rivers and"Idon’t know of anything war-like in building a dam.”

More important, accordingto the Army, is the Nike-Zeusproject now under way atHuntsville. In this antimissilemissile development programlies America’s primary hope ofshielding itself from a rain ofnuclear death should war withRussia come.

And finally, there is the mat-ter of squatter sovereignty. AsGen. Trudeau put it: “Anagency which was foresightedenough 13 years ago to get thegroup of German scientists andto go into the missile fieldearlier than anybody else anddevelop a greater competencyand demonstrated capabilitythan anybody else” deserves alittle better than what nowseems to be in store for theArmy.

Problem Solvable

In addition to all this, theArmy officials say there is noreason why NASA can’t get itswork done on a contract basis.Gen. Medaris said "we can putup another wicket at the gate”and take NASA work orders in-stead of breaking up the team.

Supplementary to these moreor less formal arguments are awelter of rumors. Three of them—that the Redstone team willbe moved bodily away fromHuntsville; that the NASA’sreal reason for the Huntsvilleraid is that it wants Dr. vonBraun as chief scientist of thenew agency, and that after thiscoup the next NASA raid willbe on the Air Force for theCape Canaveral (Fla.) launch-ing facility—all can be cate-gorically denied.

‘ The Army case fares betterunder cursory than under de-tailed examination. The actualcrux of the Army’s argumentlies in what is being done atHuntsville for the national se-curity. These are the facts:

The Jupiter IntermediateRange Ballistic Missile has beenassigned to the Air Force foroperations, and is out of Hunts-ville's hands.

The 200-500 mile Pershing. solid-fueled, ground-to-ground

tactical missile has been as-, signed to the Martin Co. for, research, development and pro-duction, and Huntsville retainsonly some monitoring respon-

i sibility.¦

Delaying Action Seen

The Nike-Zeus project atHuntsville is under the ArmyRocket and Guided MissileAgency commanded by Brig.Gen. John G. Shinkle, and notin the ken of the Von Braun

! team supervised by Gen. Bark-

If an OK on the latest NASAproposal can be deferred for63 days beyond the councilmeeting the plan will be tossedthe Army's Congressional

! friends can block it.The only trouble with this

reasoning—from a long rangepoint of view—is that every-body would lose and nobm*ywpuld win by guch strategy. If

i the NASA plan is deferreduntil 1959, NASA undoubtedlywill give up as a lost cause anyhope of absorbing going con-cerns. Willy-nilly, lt will setabout the long, hard businessof building from the ground up.

Meanwhile, in a couple ofyears’ time, the Huntsville

, group will find its militaryprojects taken over by the AirForce under apparent presentPentagon policies of puttingall space eggs in one basket.

At length perhaps in 1961ior 1962—the Von Brsun-Medaris operations would find

' themselves worked out of a job.

And, as a team at least, theywould have nowhere to go.

For this and other reasons,all signs point to a White

ADVERTISEMENT

nflP’ • S

fl K&iTv ¦ft*. m

THE EVENING STAR, WASHINGTON, D. C., WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1958

House decision in favor ofNABA; not this week, probably,but in all likelihood within thenext month or six weeks.

ADVERTISEMENT

PULL THEKEY

ON 30-E

ELECT

JUDGEREEVES

WASHINGTON DC. - LANGLEY PARK, MARYLAND

: -i' 'iBH (credit service charge includedi

‘Hal AA

V JL---

EASY 2-speed, 2-cycleautomatic washer f

• exclusive Easy Spiralator a two rinse water tempera- * twin time cycle selectionsroll-over washing action. tures, plus power-rinse, give a choice of settings

rinses away suds and soil. for len9th of w«h, "9 ond• three wash water temper- nniHig.

atures give safe, gentle, • two wash and two spin , variable load size selec-thorough washing of all speeds perfectly launder Hons automatically fillfabrics. all garments. > washer to correct level.

$r gas range round up salej new thrift purchase plan vj

-/£ no down payment, up to 36 months to pay /1 ,

on your gas bill—pay only 7.21 per month I \

_ kmjWWJ

| o s 2O trade-infor your old range on a new

I I TAPPMI 56i/rwMy 234. 50 v - I matchless¦ note \ ¦

191 zLSO* |'

gas rangeH (HUB JL JL. installed /

Rv ... .. / B Handsomely styled 1959 Tappanwi your o

with all new milk-glass finishedJHMgI lighted back the amaz-

ing range with all the conveniences

you want —set 'n' forget burners,

'MET 1 divided cooking top, huge storage

pSg space, large oven with window and- light, lift-off oven door ond swing-

—-SL. L out broiler—and it's budget pricedvisual** lift-off set *' foryct during Foil Range Roundup!

•van door even deer burners•Price include/ normal intUSlation

Lansburgh’s—WASHEßS AND RANGES—Washington, Sixth Floor; Langley Park, Lower Level

shop early, shop late Thursday, both

A-16