9SOL3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 9SOL3

    1/3

    Econ 116 Spring 2009 Problem Set 3 Solutions

    1. Assume that a bank has on its asset side reserves of 500 and loans of 3000 and

    on its liability side deposits of 3500. Assume that the required reserve ratio is 10

    percent.

    (a) How much is the bank required to hold as reserves given its deposits of 3500?

    (b) How much are its excess reserves?

    Since the bank is holding $500, 500-350=$150 is the amount of excess reserves.

    (c) By how much can the bank increase its loans?

    The bank can increase its loans by the amount of total excess reserves, which is $150.

    So they can make additional loans worth of $150.

    (d) Suppose a depositor comes to the bank and withdraws 200 in cash. Show the

    banks new balance sheet, assuming the bank obtains the cash by drawing down its

    reserves. Does the bank now hold excess reserves? Is it meeting the required reserve

    ratio? If not, what can it do?

    2. The T-account analysis in class showed that the Fed can increase the money

    supply by buying government securities. Why does this action lower the interest rate?

    What assumptions are you making about the demand for money in your answer?

    Explain carefully.

    M

    r

    M*

    r*

    MS

    MD

    MS

    M**

    r**

    To increase money supply, Fed, through open

    market operations, purchases bonds from public.

    This will drive up the price of the bonds in the

    open market. Since we know that bond prices are

    negatively related to interest rates, interest rates

    will decrease.

    Since rrr (required reserve ratio or reserve to deposit

    ratio)=0.10, then minimum amount of reserves the bank

    should hold is R*/D=0.10 => R*/3500=0.10=>R*=350.

    Bank is reuired to hold b law at least $350.

    Balance Sheet of Bank

    Assets Liabilities

    R0500 D03500

    L03000

    Now the bank has $300 in reserves which is $50 less thanthe required reserve amount. In this case, at the end of the

    day, when the bank closes its balances, it can either borrow

    from the Fed (using the discount rate) or from other

    commercial banks (using the federal funds rate) to achieve

    reuired reserve ratio.

    Balance Sheet of Bank (afterthe withdrawal) Assets

    Liabilities R0300

    D03200

    L03000

  • 8/10/2019 9SOL3

    2/3

    3. Since the U.S. Treasury must sell government securities to finance any deficit

    that it may run, is it ever possible for a deficit to be financed by printing money?

    Explain carefully. (Hint: the answer is yes.) How is the interest rate affected, if at all,

    when deficits are financed without printing money?

    Yes, The Fed could buy newly issued government bonds directly from the government

    (the Treasury).As Fed buys these bonds from the Treasury, and as Treasury spends

    the money, money supply in the economy will increase through the money multiplier,

    which will reduce interest rates.

    If government finances its deficit by borrowing from public (through bonds), there

    won't be any change in the money supply. (Think of this as a transaction between 2parties one borrowing from the other). Since there is no change in the money supply,

    interest rates will stay the same.

    4. As recently as last year when Professor Fair went to an ATM machine to

    withdraw money from his interest bearing money market account he withdrew $300.

    Now he withdraws $500. Is this rational on his part? Why or why not? (Professor Fair

    will not feel bad if you say he is not rational as long as this is the correct answer.)

    In this question, we have to understand Professor Fairs demand for money. Assuming

    Professor Fair lives in a Keynesian world, then his money demand will depend on threevariables, price level, interest rates, and his income level. MD= f(P,r,Y). In this

    equation, as Interest rate increases, your money demand will decrease (Since you can

    earn more by depositing your money to the bank and youll have less money in your

    hand). As your income increases your money demand will increase (As your income

    increases youll engage in more transactions.) Finally, as prices increase your money

    demand will increase (Youll need more money for your transactions.) Assuming price

    level and Professor Fairs income level didnt change over the last year, and knowing

    that Fed decreased the interest rates, we can claim that his average money holdings

    increased over the last year due to the decrease in interest rates. So he is perfectly

    rational.

    5. Say you bought a 10-year government bond last year that yielded 4.5 percent

    per year. Assume that since that time the 10-year government bond rate has dropped

    to 3.0 percent. Are you better off or worse off after this drop? Explain carefully. How is

    this related to Professor Serebryakov?

  • 8/10/2019 9SOL3

    3/3

    To make our answer simple, suppose we have a console bond (a bond that pays a fixed

    amount forever). Then, Pb=(1/r), where Pb is the price of the bond, and r is the

    interest rate. In this equation, if the interest rate drops, you are obviously better off,

    since the price of the bond will increase (note, since you already own the bond when

    the interest rates decrease, you will still earn the same coupon from the bond and

    receive a higher price should you wish to sell).