71
9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

9/11 Strikes

Technical Investigation

Eng. Mehmet

Page 2: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Official Theory:

• 4 teams of 19 “SUICIDE MUSLIM TERRORISTS” hijacked 4 flights and crashed the planes into buildings and the ground.

Page 3: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

THEY USED CUTTERS

• This cutter was presumed to be used in flight UA93, exhibit of the government in Moussaoui’s trial.

Page 4: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Consequences

• 2948 killed during the strikes.• Two wars started and two countries invaded.• More than 3600 American soldiers dead, in addition to

hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian people.• Bin Ladin, known by few, became an overnight

televison celebrity.• Terrorist strikes increased as never before: Bali,

Madrid, London, Iraq, Afghanistan, Turkey, Yemen, …• Muslims are labeled as TERRORISTS. That was the

beginning of the never-ending war against Muslims and no one acted to stop it.

Page 5: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Anomalies 1

• Flight passenger lists had none of the terrorists names. It is possible to make false identity documents for 1, 2 or 3 people; where are the rest?

• Several terrorists reported alive. See BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm

• FBI Director Robert Mueller admitted that "the identity of several of the hijackers is in doubt", but he never explained how they had first been identified.

• Arguing over « National Security » almost all information has been classified secret and became inaccessible.

Page 6: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Anomalies 2

• None of the black boxes have ever been released to the public.

• None of the planes parts has been identified by their serial numbers.

• The twin towers could not collapse. They were designed to resist an impact of a similar sized commercial plane, the 707.

• The official reports contain too many omissions, distortions, and lies.

Page 7: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

What’s the Reality?

• There are several evidences. But we will study only three proved facts:

• All four planes were controlled by only ONE team. They used American electronic weapon technology.

• Twin towers were demolished by explosives.• The plane that hit the Pentagon was not a

Boeing 757. • For more details, we recommend to look into internet.

Attention: There are too many unrealistic theories on the web. We want to emphasize that we refute them. But when the amount of available information is very small it’s normal to get so many theories, and many disinformation agents. You have to form your own opinion.

Page 8: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

How could the US government make the strikes?

• Set up a team to make the strikes

• Use technology to precisely control the planes

• The realisation by one team using technology will create some behavioral differences compared with the official version of 4 different terrorist teams

Page 9: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

One team / 4 teams

One team Four Teams

Work

Serial,To guarantee the reliability of the

actions and make no mistake, they could manage only one plane at a

time

Parallel,Each plane has its own team and pilot, they will act independently

from other planes

Coordination between planes

Yes,As consequence of the serial work it

becomes an obligation

No, As the terrorists couldn’t contact each other after the takeoffs, the

planes will be independent

Relation between

End of one plane action &

Beginning of the next plane deviation

Take off & Deviation

of the same plane

Page 10: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Probable Timeline Graphic

if 4 Different Teams

•The deviation from flight route will happen about 15 minutes after the take off.•Each plane will fly directly to its target without worrying about other flights.•Take off delays couldn’t be anticipated.. After take off, terrorists could not contact each other.•There couldn’t be any interdependence between the planes.

Page 11: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Official Flight Path

Source:http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

Source:http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

Page 12: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

The sequence of the events

Page 13: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Timeline graphic & conclusions

•All hijacks were made sequentially, one plane at a time!•Before deviating from its flight route, each plane waited for the previous plane to be put on target!•The deviation of any plane was dependent on the situation of the preceeding plane.

Page 14: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

CONCLUSION

• The planes were hijacked byONE TEAM!

• To guarantee the reliability of the action and not make mistakes

they managed one plane at a time.

• When their job was finished on a plane, they began the job of the next plane.

Page 15: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?

• It’s possible if the planes have remote adjustable automatic control capabilities!

• This technology has existed for decades.

• 1994 - An experiment at the Crows Landing NASA Facility in the Central Valley of California involved 110 landings of a Boeing 737 airliner using an experimental GPS navigation system. http://ludb.clui.org/ex/i/CA3033/

• In 10/1/2001, Raytheon released a document showing developments made on civil aircrafts like 727 and 737 to control them by automatic systems.

Page 16: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

TOMAHAWK MISSILES

A SMALL PLANE WHICH GUIDES ITSELF ACCORDING TO GPS MEASURED POSITION

Page 17: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

CONTROLE AND GUIDANCE SYSTEMPOSITION

MEASUREMENTIndependent from the

missile

ORIENTATION MEASUREMENTIndependent from the missile

COMPUTERIndependent from the missile

FLIGHT SURFACES MOTORISATIONSimulates pilot actions in an aircraft

Size increases when missile becomes bigger

They must be too much bigger in an aircraft

In the market it is possible to find different sizes and versions, including non reversible ones as standard product.

• If all these systems are installed inside the aircraft but not activated, the plane reacts normally and can take off naturally.

• When activated, the plane reacts like a missile.• The install has to be done during the last maintenance operation. The

maintenance database of these planes has been cleaned up the day of 9/11 and became inaccessible to everybody including the professional aviation companies.

Page 18: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

WHAT ABOUT THE PILOTS?

• The installed flight surface control servos can be of non reversible type to prevent the pilots countermanding the remote controls.

• The guidance control computer could use one digital output to activate a release valve injecting a military war gas inside the plane killing all passengers and flight crew.

• In this case, the autopilot can be used to guide the planes. But for the required precision and the validation of the ground control systems, the use missile control system would be necessary.

Page 19: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

PLANES

• In the next page, we consider that technology installed in all planes which are controllable like missiles with the same ground equipment.

• Lets notice that for high speed equipment like planes, the precision of the GPS is reduced. Especially in altitude measurement it becomes impossible to measure at better precision than +/-50m.

• The realization explained in the next page is the most probable explanation we found considering all available evidence, the feasibility, the reliability and simplicity of each action. We demand that an independent justice court collect all evidences, make the investigation and tell us the reality of these actions.

Page 20: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Managing and sequence of events7:59 – Take off AA118:14 – Right rotation request to AA11, pilots ok

End of connection = pilots dead &

automatic control activated

Take off UA175

~8:25 – The automatic control of AA11 is validated

Deviation towards twin towers

8:42 – Pilots reported have heard « everyone stay in your seats »

End of connection = pilots dead & automatic control activated

Deviation of UA175

8:54 - UA175 adjustments end

Deviation of AA77

9:35 – Pentagon plane adjustments end

Deviation of UA93

8:45 – AA11 impact on

North Tower

9:03 – UA175 impact on

South Tower

9:38 – Pentagon impact

10:06 – UA93 impact to ground

8:42 – AA11 adjustments end

8:42 – Take off AU93

With 41 min delay

~8:50 – The automatic control of UA175 is validated

PID parameters of AA11 copied into UA175, same B767

Immediate deviation towards twin towers

8:25+ – Automatic guidance system PID parameters are adjusted to guarantee the precision of impact

8:20 – Take off AA77

Page 21: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

The Pentagon Strike• These are the sole published

images of the Pentagon strike. Everything is done to avoid any possibility of identifying the plane. We only see the tail part of the plane.

• In reality, there are some movies of the strike recorded by surveillance cameras, some civilian. All were confiscated by the FBI immediately after the strike and have never been released.

Page 22: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Pentagon : Damages on the right Façade

• The entry hole – central fuselage of plane, Column 14• The last damaged column in the right side, Column 20• With 10ft between two columns and 6 bays, that makes 60ft as half the damage span

Page 23: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Pentagon : Plane Approach Direction

• The wingspan calculated corresponds to a Boeing 737-400 that is 95ft

• Flight AA77 was a 757 with a wingspan of 125ft so 3 extra columns should have been damaged

• Approach angle of the plane 52° :

Half a wingspan = right side half damage span(60ft) * sin52° = 47ft,

Implies a wingspan = 94ft

Page 24: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Pentagon: Closer Impact Drawing

• The dimensions fit exactly to those of a Boeing 737

Page 25: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Pentagon : Official Report

• But to justify the presence of a Boeing 757, the same report tells « the external 1/3 of the wings did no damage on the façade ». And that is justified with the impact that the engines made prior to reaching the façade which had to break down the extremity of the wings.

• The official report recognizes that the damages span over 120ft, converted to the perpendicular of the plane direction that makes 90ft instead of 125ft for a 757

Page 26: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Broken ventilation wall

The report assumes this was broken by the left engine.

Note no traces of the engine ploughing into the ground before the wall.

All cable drums were before the wall. This cable drum crossed over starting from the ground near the wall. It had to touch the wall at the ground.

Page 27: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Pentagon : Construction of 737 impact

Page 28: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Pentagon : Plane Position at Impact

• The entry hole, Column 14• The last damaged column in the right side, Column 20

The reality :

Red plane

737-400

Official Theory :

White plane

757-200

AA77

Page 29: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Hidden plane

• A Boeing 757-200 was too long and had to be visible behind the box

• A Boeing 737-400 is just hidden behind the box

Page 30: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

The Pentagon strike review

• 8:54 The team finished their job on UA175 which is flying toward its target. The team switches on the missile control system on board AA77, switches off the transponder and lowers it to make it invisible to radar. After that moment the flight route of AA77 is unknown.

• But we know that it flew the going path in 8:54-8:20=34 minutes including the take off. For the return path, it took 9.38-8.54=44 minutes WITHOUT TAKE OFF. Including the presence of another take off, there are still 10 min extra. These are the required 10 min for the crash of AA77 on the ground in a secret military zone. There is still enough time to take off a 737 and fly it to the Pentagon situated at 10km from Dulles airport where AA77 took off.

Page 31: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Why Change the Plane?• It is possible to hit a plane on 400m high

towers using a GPS receiver. A precision of +/-50m is still enough. A receiver like that can be installed in the nose of the plane where it is invisible from outside.

• To hit a plane on 23m high building the GPS receiver is not precise enough. But it had to be done while not being sure on the result. So it was necessary to install another altitude sensor which has a precision less than 1m.

• To reach that precision, the sensor must have its measurement surface placed outside of the aircraft body. If that kind of sensor was installed on the 757 of AA77 it would be detected by the visual inspection made before each take off.

• If the altitude measurement is not precise enough, the plane can either hit the ground or pass over the building. That’s unacceptable for this kind of action.

Page 32: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Pentagon :All Damages

• Notice the orange area where the slab deflected upwards. The sole possibility for that deflection is an explosion happening under it. A kerosene explosion can not accomplish this so far from the façade.

Page 33: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

TOWERS COLLAPSE

• Official Theory : Kerosene fire highly weakened the metal and made the towers collapse.

• The heating of structures of the towers is a speculation subject. In practice, it was impossible to measure temperature of the structures. The smoke was dark showing low temperature fires. In the History, there is no steel framed building collapsing by fire. The fire could not explain these collapses.

• The bottom levels of the buildings were not heated at all.

Page 34: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

ANOMALIES OF THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

• The official reports give all details of outer columns and floor trusses but they hide the most important information about the inner core columns. In some pictures the size of these columns are reduced to present them as meaningless.

Page 35: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Floor plan of NIST report

Interior core columns are drawn at good scale. But no dimension details appear in the whole report.Notice that most of the core columns can be accessed from inside the elevators shafts.

Source:http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-1.pdf

Page 36: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

NIST Reportexterior columns oversized

Page 37: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Floor plan of FEMA

report

Interior core columns are drawn as small square dots representing them as minor elements. Dimension details are not shown in the whole of the report.

Source:http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch2.pdf

Page 38: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Columns picture

Interior core columns are much bigger and stronger than exterior columns. In addition these interior core columns are linked to each other making them extremely strong.

Page 39: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

PHOTO AFTER THE COLLAPSE

NORTH TOWER

WTC1

Outer columns still vertical

Outer columns

still vertical

SOUTH TOWER

WTC2

Internal columns

demolished

Internal columns demolished

Page 40: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

PHOTO AFTER THE COLLAPSE

Façade columns still vertical

Internal columns demolished,

There must be 47 tube columns, which are 5” thick in the lower floors

Page 41: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

STRUCTURE OF THE TOWERS

External columns that remained vertical over some floors after the collapse

It is clear that the inner columns are the main structure of the building. That’s true in all well produced high buildings.

Reversely, the exterior walls can really be compared to a hollow steel shaft.

Internal columns are the main structure of the building Demolished during the collapse! The Commission report contains that LIE :

Page 42: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

RESISTANCE OF THE STRUCTURE

According to the reality of the towers and to anti-seismic construction rules

According to the official reports

Page 43: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

CONCRETE MADE SKYCRAPER (30floors)

Cast concrete

core section

Outer columns

Page 44: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Possible damage

• These internal columns are able to resist against collapsing of all upper floors.

• The worst possible damage is the sinking of some floors at impact level. Lower floors remaining unchanged.

Page 45: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Internal Core Columns Remain Standing During the Collapse

WTC2These pictures are taken by Aman Zafar who was near the towers (www.amanzafar.com) . They show that the inner core of both WTC1 and WTC2 remained standing while the floors and façade columns were collapsing. That proves that the core section was resistant enough and could not collapse without explosives.

WTC1

Page 46: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Pictures Set

1 2

3 4

Page 47: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Internal Column Dimensions WTC2

• WTC2: The width of the columns remaining still standing are smaller than the width of the core section. It is consistent with the width of the two smallest columns rows in blue. That's identical to the core reduced by the columns which are accessible from the lift shafts. The destruction of these columns will lead to the demolition of whole tower.

Page 48: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Internal columns dimensions WTC1

Page 49: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

TOWERS DEMOLITIONHOW that can be made?• During the last week-end of 8-9 September 2001,

radio controlled and coded RDX or C4 explosives were installed on all junctions of the core columns that are accessible from the lift shafts. Each pack is identified by a numeric code. The explosives for the same floor have the same code. Each pack has a quick fixing tool for assembly on the columns. 15 people can install explosives on both towers during the week-end.

• After the plane hit, on basis of the impact floor, the authors knew the identity code of the explosives which must be exploded to start the demolition.

• To avoid the upper level parts from falling on lower level explosives causing them to explode, the explosion speed must be higher than free fall in the air.

• The measured progression speed of the explosions is near the free fall speed +/- measurement errors.

• A laptop computer situated near the towers contained a program producing the radio codes to fire the explosives at wanted speed.

• The control center where the team acted is very probably the WTC building 7 from where both towers are visible and which was collapsed during the afternoon of 9/11/01 and which was owned by the same Larry Silverstein who owned the twin towers.

• The sole possibility to demolish these towers is to explode these internal columns at their junctions.

Page 50: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Core Columns Destruction Method• Such explosions happened on all welded junctions of the columns.

Page 51: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

The distance between two explosions is approximately 3 floors, 36ft

Page 52: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

EXPLODED COLUMNS

Page 53: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Horizontal sheared column

• This picture shows the sheared connection between a box core column and an H section column. This type of connection existed at the uppermost floors of WTC towers. We see that the shearing was made by lateral displacement of the H sectioned column. The welds are pushed rightward in the picture. Such shearing is consistent with the explosion demolition method.

Page 54: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

TOWERS DEMOLITION• Only very big

explosions can explain the creation of such a huge amount of dust and metal columns thrown so far away. The explosions cut the internal columns of the structure of the tower.

Page 55: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

SOUTH TOWER DEMOLITION

Continuously increasing dust size is meaningful. The explosions are so quick that falling dust reaches newly created dust by the

explosions of the lower floors.

Page 57: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 1

• Arabic flight manuals found in a car near of one of the airports: the international language for aviation is English. Student pilots must have an adequate knowledge of English to be accepted for training and all their flight manuals would be in English if, as has been claimed, they undertook flight training in the USA. Arabic manuals are highly suspect and might have been specially prepared in justification of the events following 9/11.

• The half burnt hijacker’s passport found at ground zero: No human body was found, no debris was recognizable, but this passport remained intact, only slightly charred! In reality, this passport was retained by the CIA or some other agency. Then burnt before being shown to the medias.

Page 58: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 2

• Phone calls Phone calls made by cellular phones from planes flying at high altitudes of 30,000 feet: Even now in 2007, such calls remain impossible. By design mobile phone signals are guided horizontally to save power and only reach mobile phones at ground level. Therefore, the cellular phones cannot be used in the air.

• Since several decades the technique of synthesizing a voice synthesis is widely used. Israeli companies connected to Hollywood are the market leaders in this domain.

• When listening to some of the alleged call, there is no background noise coming from the planes; the sound is extremely clear as if spoken by actors.

Page 59: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 3• Cockpit communications from UA93 released in 2006: These

communications do not have any credibility. They contain meaningless repeats of "sit down!", "what?", and "Allahu akbar". This last sentence is the most familiar Muslim expression in the West, but Muslims would not use it when faced with death.

• Moussaoui case: He was arrested 3 weeks before the strikes when intending to start flight training on 747s. When preparing strikes of this magnitude, it would make sense to start training years ahead, no 3 weeks.

• "I want to learn to fly without take off and without landing" : These alleged comments were provided of their willingness to crash the planes into a building. However, many amateurs interested in flying express themselves like this, wanting the enjoyment of flight without the tedious hard work. By itself such a sentence is worthless as evidence.

Page 60: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

What About Bin Ladin?• During the first three years Bin Ladin said he was not

involved in 911!• Now, he is telling that he is the author!• To consider his messages, this needs to be handled by

a court of impartial justice :1. He should speak to an independent court.2. He should be protected, his life guaranteed, to make

his testimony totally free.3. All of his testimony should be checked against the

facts.4. It is too easy for the Bush Administration to have him

free, speaking as Bush wants him to speak. It is also very easy to produce his voice.

5. I refuse to recognize Bin Ladin as a spokesman for Muslims.

Page 61: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 4Video of OBL released in November 2001: We saw a bearded man like OBL speaking with very bad sound and making statements like "their lost is more than 3 billion dollar", whereas OBL had studied in England and spoke English well. Physiognomic studies showed that this person was not Bin Ladin. In addition, an ideological fighter will not emphasis financial losses. But we know that for the domestic media the emphasis on financial losses is very important to make an impression on people in the US

Video of OBL released in November 2004 : Here I believe that it was indeed Bin Ladin and he spoke like a Muslim. He indirectly takes responsibility for the strikes and justifies them on basis of 1980's Lebanon strikes: It's too easy for the USA to ask OBL to take responsibility for the strikes in order to left alone! Any way, OBL must be heard by a court of justice, and all what he says must be checked.In 9/2007, other movies containing another OBL with shorter and painted beard speaking against the same background have been released. It's clear that this is not the same person. What kind game is being played here? After using him in 2004, did they kill him and put an actor in his place? It is difficult to tell. The truth can only be found if real evidence is presented.

Page 62: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

CONCLUSIONS

• There are many convergent evidences that prove the official theory is false!

• The presence of Muslim suicide pilots is not proved.

• There is enough evidence to request the disclosure of all classified information. Without that disclosure, both national and world security are in danger.

• These strikes can not be managed without knowledge and permission of the Bush administration’s high level deciders.

Page 63: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Does the US Administration have the skills to accomplish

these strikes?

• YES, they do!

Some false flag terror strikes having different manner and authors that justified wars :

• Explosion of cruiser Maine! (1898)• Reichstag fire (1933)• Pearl Harbor (1941)• Operation Northwoods (1962)• Assassination of JFK (1963)• Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam (1964)

Page 64: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

IMAGE GAMES

OFFICIAL ASCE REPORT’S FIRST PAGE THE REALITY OF THE FACTS

US Navy Base in San Diego City

googleearth

Page 65: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

The Conquistador, Successor of HitlerHe managed to start the invasion of Muslims countries

Page 66: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Why? Bali, Madrid, London, Morocco,..

• Life in Muslim countries is simple: If you don’t bother anyone, no one will bother you. But if you attack someone, you will get an equal reaction.

• Let’s remember that before 9/11/01, during Clinton’s Administration efforts for peace in Palestine, the strikes had been reduced and there was dialogue.

• If the number and the intensity of the attacks are low and the reactions remain moderate, it can be resolved with good results.

• Today the intensity of the aggression (Americans) and injustices (Israelis) are so high that there is no room for dialogue or moderate reactions.

• The traditional method of Muslim countries has not adapted to today’s aggressions and injustices.

• We need another solution! The last remaining one is Justice which is imperfect, costly, and slow. Muslims must get used to its methods and complexities. And justice must be less imperfect.

Page 67: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

Why? Madrid and London

• Let me explain some doubts about the Madrid and London blasts. I did no investigation into these actions. But my thoughts are:

• In Madrid they used cellular phones as radio controlled firing systems, similar to the explosives used in the WTC towers. The method was new. In 2007 Muslims are still making suicide bombings without using such technology. The authors must be the same people who made 9/11 strikes. I hope the current lawsuit in Spain will lead to some truth. I trust Spanish justice.

• The cctv cameras of the London tube were controlled and recorded by an Israeli company, before, during, and after the blasts. Simple children are shown as terrorists.

• These are the sole organized big blasts in European countries.• All other actions done by Muslims in European countries were individual

actions made by foolish people: Theo Van Gogh murder and other people placing gas bottles near the door of a synagogue.

• These small actions are not comparable to the Madrid and London blasts.• To get stronger credibility and remove all doubts in such investigations, all

evidences must be checked and independent Muslim professionals must be fully involved.

• This was before the verdict of Spanish court on 31 october 2007.

Page 68: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

11 March 2004 Madrid strikes

• The Spanish court of justice reached its verdict on 31th October 2007 after 3 years of investigation and an 8-month trial against 28 defendants.

• Three of them were found guilty and received more than a total of 40,000 years imprisonment for having supplied or placed the explosives without participating in the actual bombing.

• The remaining 25 defendants were not at all involved in the Madrid bombings.• 18 of them received several jail sentences of up to 18 years without having taken part

in or being related to the bombings.• 7 were acquitted.• The masterminds of the bombings were not identified.• How can 3 years of investigation bring 25 uninvolved people to the trial while the

masterminds remain unknown?• This poses serious questions for the impartiality of the trial. During 3 years of

investigation all the evidence collected should have identified the masterminds and let those 25 without any direct involvement go free.

• It appears that the court needed to put the blame on someone and thus found passed guilty verdicts on random Muslim suspects.

• As for the exploded flat in Madrid it could well be that ordinary Arab tourists had stayed there. Whilst they were out of the flat some people might have installed explosives in their flat. Upon their return the culprits ignited the explosives by remote control, filming it at the same time for the benefit of the media.

Page 69: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

July 7, 2005 London strikes

• The cctv cameras of the London tube were controlled and recorded by an Israeli company.

• There is no record showing the Muslim bombers entering these wagons.• Natanyahu who had to give a conference near the explosion area received a

call from the Mossad asking him to remain in his hotel.• The policewoman Lizzie Kenworthy was next to the exploded wagon. She

entered inside the explosion area and explained what she saw: The chap next to her had lost his leg and there was a woman to their left who was on her back trapped in the metal, which had twisted up through the middle of the carriage. The roof was still on, but the lining of the carriage had been blown off. The sides had also come off and there was a big hole in the floor. That means the bombs were placed under the carriage. Sources http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article333787.ece

• According to that testimony of a policewoman it’s impossible that any passenger have placed these bombs under the carriage. So Muslims are not involved in 7/7 London events.

• Justice has to be done again.

Page 70: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

MY MOTIVES• The World is becoming a small village, the changes are very

huge. • Humanity is facing several challenges. One of the challenges is

diversity of life.• As a Muslim, I believe that diversity, being the will of God, will

enrich us with our differences. Koran 5/48, 49/13.• As a scientist, I consider peaceful diversity as one of the most

important conditions for life to exist.• That diversity can only exist in a just world!• I know that interest groups created these strikes to start wars. I

didn’t start this investigation to help these warlike people. So let’s not deviate into hate which will make easier the work of these warlike people. Only some American Republican leaders are guilty.

• Let’s act as responsible people for peace and justice. That means fighting against our own unjust people as well. Justice is in the best interest of all.

Page 71: 9/11 Strikes Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet

END

Eng. Mehmet

Copyright 2003-2008