Upload
santino-fanning
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
99CHAPTE
R
DYNAMIC POWERPOINT™ SLIDES BY SOLINA LINDAHL
International TradeInternational Trade
CHAPTER OUTLINE
2
Analyzing Trade with Supply and Demand
The Costs of Protectionism
Arguments against International Trade
For applications, click here
To Try it! To Try it! questionsquestions
To To VideoVideo
Some good blogs and other sites to get the juices flowing:
Food for Food for Thought….Thought….
3
BACK TO
Analyzing Trade with Supply and Demand
We can use the demand and supply model to determine:
The effects of free trade on:Domestic equilibrium price and quantityImports
The effects of trade barriers on:Domestic equilibrium price and quantity Imports
BACK TO
with free trade:•World price prevails.•Domestic consumption =•Domestic production =
Analyzing Trade with Supply and Demand
Price
Quantity of semiconductors
P no trade
Free tradeequilibrium
tradefree
Stradefree
D QQ
tradeno
Q
trade freeSQ
Domestic demand
Domestic supply
World supplyWorld price
No tradeequilibrium
Domesticproduction
Domestic consumption
Imports
tradefree
DQtradefree
SQ
trade freeDQ
• imports =
BACK TO
With Tariff:•World price + tariff prevails.•Domestic consumption= •Domestic production =
Analyzing Trade with Supply and Demand
Price
Quantity of semiconductors
pno trade
tariffS
tariffD QQ
tradeno
Q
tariffSQ
Domestic demand
Domestic supply
World supply + tariffWorld price+ tariff
Equilibrium with tariff
Domesticproduction
tariffDQ
• imports =
World price World Supplytariff
tradefree
SQ tradefree
DQ
Domestic consumption
Imports w/tariff
• tariff revenue
Importsw/ free trade
tariffDQtariff
SQ
Try it!Try it!
A tariff results in a higher:I. consumer surplus.II. producer surplus.III. government revenue.
a)I and II onlyb)II and III onlyc)I and III onlyd)I, II, and III
To next To next Try it! Try it!
BACK TO
The Costs of Protectionism
Protectionism Protectionism = policy of restraining trade through quotas, tariffs, or other regulations which burden foreign (but not domestic) producers.
TariffTariff = a tax on imports
Trade Quota Trade Quota = a restriction on the quantity of goods that can be imported: imports greater than the quota amount are forbidden (or heavily taxed.)
8
BACK TO
The Costs of Protectionism
A tariff has two effects:1. ↑ domestic production, ↓ domestic
consumption.More of the good is produced by the higher-cost domestic producers.
2. Less is consumed → lower gains from trade.
Measuring the losses and wasted resources
Can we measure the value of wasted resources? Yes!
BACK TO
The Costs of Protectionism
Price perpound(in cents)
Quantity(in billions of pounds)
Domestic demand
Domestic supply
World supply + tariff
World price
Free tradeequilibrium
20
20
9
24
U. S. costs
Worldcosts
Wasted resources
World supply
Lost gains from tradeor deadweight loss
Tariffequilibrium
BACK TO
The Costs of Protectionism
Price perpound(in cents)
Quantity(in billions of pounds)
Domestic demand
Domestic supply
World supply + tariff
World price
20
20
9
24
$1.1 billion
World supply
Value of wasted resources = [(.20 – .09) x 20]/2 = $1.1 billion
Lost gains from trade= [(.20 - .09) x (24 – 20)]/2 = $.22 billion
BACK TO
The Costs of Protectionism
Conclusions:A tariff reduces economic efficiency:
Low-cost producers are prevented from selling.
Mutually profitable gains from trade are prevented by law.
U.S. consumers pay more, and workers in other countries (many of whom are poor) lose income.
Try it!Try it!A $1 tariff results in:a)An increase in imports of 80 million units.b)A decrease in imports of 80 million units.c)An increase in imports of 100 million units.d)A decrease in imports of 100 million units.
To next To next Try it! Try it!
BACK TO
The Costs of Protectionism
One final cost: lobbyingThe loss to domestic consumers is
greater than the gains to domestic producers.
Why does congress pass tariffs?Small number of producers → Benefit
per producer is high.Large number of consumers → Loss per
consumer is low.
BACK TO
Arguments Against International Trade
Most Common Arguments1. Trade reduces the number of jobs in the
U.S.2. It’s wrong to trade with countries that use
child labor.3. We need to keep some industries for
reasons of national security.4. We need to keep some “key” industries
because of beneficial spillovers onto other sectors.
5. We can increase U.S. well-being with strategic trade protectionism.
Try it!Try it!Which argument against trade is the strongest in your opinion?a)Trade reduces the number of jobs in the U.S.b)It’s wrong to trade with countries that use child labor.c)We need to keep some industries for reasons of national security.d)We need to keep some “key” industries because of beneficial spillovers onto other sectors.e)We can increase U.S. well-being with strategic trade protectionism.
BACK TO
BACK TO
Rebuttals
Trade and JobsTariffs raise the price of protected goods.
Consumers have less money to spend on other goods.Jobs are lost in other industries—these
lost jobs are hard to see.
Trade creates jobsThe U.S. dollars we spend on other
country’s good are often used to buy our goods.Jobs are created in U.S. exporting
industries.17
BACK TO
Rebuttals
Child LaborRestricting imports made by child labor may do more harm than good.
Children work out of necessity—what else will they do?
Often the alternative is worse.ProstitutionScrounging in refuse dumps
Child labor is a poverty problem, not a trade problem.
18
BACK TO
Poverty and Child Labor
Source: Edmonds, E. and N. Pavcnik, 2005. “Child Labor in the global economy” Journal of Economic Perspectives
BACK TO
Rebuttals
Trade and National SecurityTrue: Some industries probably should be protected to protect National Security.BUT: This is subject to great abuse—almost every industry can make this argument for protection.Examples:
Vaccine production?—probably a good idea.
Angora Goat fleece?--are you kidding? No. This is protected.
iI think I am vital to your security. No
kidding.
BACK TO
Rebuttals
Key IndustriesSome industries are characterized by large spillovers to other industries (and should be encouraged).
Example: Computer chips have spillover spillover benefits that go beyond the computer chip industry
BUT:Subsidy (to chip makers) is a better
option than a tariff. Tariff would be second-best.
Hard to determine which industries are key.
BACK TO
Rebuttals
Strategic Trade Protectionism Strategic Trade Protectionism = Government helps domestic firms act like a cartel when they sell to international buyers.
May be able to grab up a larger share of the gains from trade than with free trade.
This is done by forcing other countries to pay MORE for your goods, usually with an export tax.
Will the exporting country see more revenue?Success depends on Price Elasticity of Demand. OPEC succeeds because oil has few substitutes.If the U.S. taxes car exports, it may just encourage foreigners to switch to a substitute good (Japanese cars, for instance).
BACK TO
At TEDIndia, TED favorite Hans Rosling gives another lively and humorous talk- and graphs global economic growth since 1858. He also predicts the exact date that India and China will outstrip the US. (15:50 minutes)
BACK TO
SEE THE SEE THE INVISIBLEINVISIBLE HANDHAND
SEE THE SEE THE INVISIBLEINVISIBLE HANDHAND
24
Globalization is not new Phoenicians: 1550 B.C. TradersRoman Empire: 753 B.C. Specialization and TradeCollapse of trade networks? 476 A.D. “Dark Ages”Revitalized trade routes? 1300s “European Renaissance”
Periods of increased trade and the spread of ideas have been among the best for human progress.