View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chris D. Frith, T. Singer, The role of social cognition in decision making , “Phil. Trans. R.
Soc. B” (2008), vol. 363, p. 3875–3886.
THESES:
(1) Social cognition is a process which shouldn’t be analyzed in isolation from moral
intuitions, motivational biases, and high-level executive control. It’s a complex and
complicated set of various elements which “works” together in order to making a decision.
(2) Model of decision making proposed by Evans plays a very important role in legal thought.
Cognition and emotions have equally important function in case moral judgment, and also
when it comes to making economic decisions. Emotions not always, as Damasio wants, lead
us astray. However, rational, affect-free decisions in the domain of economics are not always
economically effective (from long-time perspective).
ABSTRACT:
Authors analyse a wide range of topics which are strongly connected with various models of
social decision making. For example, in this paper we can find remarks about neuronal mirror
systems responsible for understanding other people’s motor actions and action intentions.
Mirror neurons – a hot topic in the contemporary neuroscience and moral psychology – are
also mentioned as higher order mirror systems in our brain, allowing us to understand and
even share emotions and sensations with others. At the even higher level, we are able to
construct “theory of mind” (TOM), which allows us to understand beliefs of wishes in others.
Above mentioned tools are crucial for making decisions in social domain. However, after
describing them, authors move to other topic – the interaction between emotions and reason in
social decision making. This second problem is popular and well describe in literature of the
subject (J. Haidt, O.R. Goodennough and K. Prehn, J.Kennett and C. Folin and many others).
They discuss emotion/reason dichotomy in four situations: (1) our sense of fairness, (2)
altruistic punishment, (3) trust, (4) the framing effect. What is new in the paper, is setting the
common ground for moral and economic decisions. It seems that authors agree with the
possibility that we will be able to build a general model of social decision making, and not
only – as we can today – incomplete models of decision making in moral, economic and legal
domain.
COMMENTS:
The paper is well written and very interesting. Unquestionably, the strongest point of it is a
presentation of influence on social decision making such mechanisms like: neuronal mirror
systems, empathy, and theory of mind (TOM). Theses presented in the paper are well
documented by empirical data (lesion, behavioral, and neuroimagining data). When it comes
to emotion/reason problem, we know today more than authors write in their article. For
example, a trolley dilemma, and footbridge dilemma are more complicated, and they prove
something else than Firth and Singer want to. But it’s still a very good piece of work form
moral psychology and neuroeconomics.