85518966 David Lodge the Modes of Modern Writing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 85518966 David Lodge the Modes of Modern Writing

    1/320

    The Modes ofModern WritingMetaphor, Metonymy, and the

    Typology of Modern Literature

    I

    David Lodge

    Edward A rnoldA m e m b e r o f t h e H o d d e r H e a d l i n e G r o u pL O N D O N M E L B O ! N E A " # L A N D

  • 8/10/2019 85518966 David Lodge the Modes of Modern Writing

    2/320

    What does literature do and how does it do it. And what does English

    Literature do and hno dots it do it. And what ways does it use to do what n

    does.

    Ctertrude Ste,,,

    Edward Arnold is a division of Hoddcr Headline PLC 33KEuston Road, London NWI 3BH

    !"" #avid Lod$e

    %irst &u'lis(ed in t(e )nited Kin$do* !""%irst &u'lis(ed in &a&er'ac+ !"!

    All ri$(ts reserved No &art of t(is &u'lication *a- 'e re&roduced ortrans*itted in an- for* or '- an- *eans, electronicall- or *ec(anicall-,./. /$ &(otoco&-in$, recordin$ or an- infor*ation stora$e or retrieval0v wit(out cit(er &rior &er*ission in writin$ fro* t(e &u'lis(er or alit &er*ittin$ restricted co&-in$ In t(e )nited Kin$do* suc(li tL1vcs are issued '- t(e Co&-ri$(t Licensin$ A$enc- !2 otten(a* Court

    Road London WIP /Hli

    British Library C dialoguing in Publication DataA catalo$ue record for t(is 'oo+ is availa4e fro* I(e Britis( Li'rar-

    / 'SBN0-7I3I-A2M-!

    5 II 2 9 6 " ft 7!6 !" !8 9: !;

    I. d and 'ound in t(e )nited Kin$do* '-A ,

  • 8/10/2019 85518966 David Lodge the Modes of Modern Writing

    3/320

    "ontents

    $refa%e &ii$refatory Note to the 'e%ond (mpre))ion *iiiA%+nowledgement) *&

    #art $ne% #ro&e(s and )*e+,tions

    -hat i) Literature. (/ George Orwell0) 0A Hanging0, and 0Mi%hael La+e De)%ribe)0 12 O)%ar -ilde3 0The Ballad of !eading Gaol0 45 -hat i) !eali)m. //6 Arnold Bennett3 The Old Wives' Tale /47 -illiam Burrough)3 The Naked Lunch 264 The !eali)ti% Tradition 288 Two #ind) of Modern 9i%tion 51 "riti%i)m and !eali)m 62

    : The No&el and theNouvelle Critique 64 "on%lu)ion to $art One 4:

    #art To% Meta.hor and Meton(

    ;a+ob)on0) Theory 42/ Two Type) of Apha)ia 442 The Metaphori% and Metonymi% $ole) 415 Drama and 9ilm 86 $oetry, $ro)e and the $oeti% 887 Type) of De)%ription 12

    4 The E*e%ution) !e&i)ited(:

    28 The Metonymi% Te*t a) Metaphor :11 Metaphor and "onte*t l l1

    #art Three% Modernists Anti(odernists and

    #ost(odernists

    ;ame) ;oy%e (/6/ Gertrude 'tein r552 Erne)t Hemingway

  • 8/10/2019 85518966 David Lodge the Modes of Modern Writing

    4/320

    &i Contents

    5 D< H< Lawren%e6 =irginia -oolf7 (n the Thirtie)4 $hilip Lar+in8 $o)tmoderni)t 9i%tion

    Appendi* A3 0A Hanging0 by

    George Orwell0Mi%hael La+e De)%ribe) -hat theE*e%utioner A%tually 9a%e)0E*tra%t from The Naked Lunchby-illiam Burrough)

    Note) and !eferen%e)

    (nde*

    7:

    44

    88

    212

    220

    /57

    /6:

    /6/

    /65

    /46

    >

    Appendi* B3

    Appendi* "3

  • 8/10/2019 85518966 David Lodge the Modes of Modern Writing

    5/320

    #refa+e

    The fir)t part of thi) boo+ %on)ider) )ome fundamental ?ue)tion) of

    literary theory and %riti%al pra%ti%e, illu)trated by referen%e to a widerange of modern te*t)@ ?ue)tion) )u%h a), what i) literature, what i)reali)m, what i) the relation)hip between form and %ontent inliterature, and what prin%iple) underlie the &ariety of literary form),and the %hange) in literary fa)hion, in the modern era. To an)wer )u%h?ue)tion), it i) argued, we need a %omprehen)i&e typology of literarydi)%our)ethat i), one %apable of de)%ribing and di)%riminatingbetween all type) of te*t without preudging them< The )e%ond part ofthe boo+ de)%ribe) and e*plore) a theory of language upon whi%h )u%ha typology may be ba)ed!oman ;a+ob)on0) di)tin%tion betweenmetaphor and metonymyand applie) it to the analy)i) of a number of

    )hort te*t), in%luding tho)e e*amined in $art One< (n $art Three, thetheory i) applied to a more di)%ur)i&e and hi)tori%al )tudy of the wor+of parti%ular writer), or )%hool) and generation) of writer), in the

    modern period Dra(a and 8i(

    -hen ;a+ob)on )ay) that drama i) e))entially 0metaphori%0 he i) %learlythin+ing of the generi% %hara%ter of dramati% art a) it ha) manife)tedit)elf throughout the hi)tory of %ulture< Ari)ing out of religiou) ritualin whi%h a )ymboli% )a%rifi%e wa)su7stituted for a real one drama i)%orre%tly interpreted by it) audien%e a) being analogou) to rather thandire%tly imitati&e of reality, and ha) attained it) highe)t a%hie&ement)in %la))i%al Gree%e, in Eliabethan England, in neo%la))i%al 9ran%eby being poeti%, u)ing a language with a builtCin empha)i) on pattern)of )imilarity and %ontra)t %ontra)t being a +ind of negati&e )imilarity

    8/ Meta*hor and Meton$m$

    illu)ion, but of bringing into a )ingle frame of referen%e a %on)tellationof e&ent) )ay, Oedipu)0) birth, hi) +illing of an old man, )ol&ing of ariddle, marriage that were not %ontiguou) in )pa%e or time but%ombine on the le&el of )imilarity the old man i) the )ame a) the father,the wife i) the )ame a) the mother, the )on i) the )ame a) the hu)bandto form a me))age of tragi% import< Eliabethan drama i) moreob&iou)ly narrati&e than Gree+ tragedy that i), more linear or)yntagmati% in it) %on)tru%tion but it) mo)t di)tin%ti&e formal feature,the double plot, i) a de&i%e of )imilarity and %ontra)t< The two plot) of

    Aing Lear and the %omple* pairing and %ontra)ting and di)gui)ing of%hara%ter) in that play i) a %la))i% e*ample of )u%h dramati% )tru%ture,whi%h generally ha) the effe%t of retarding, or di)tra%ting attentionfrom, the %hronologi%al )e?uen%e of e&ent)< (n the )torm )%ene ofLear,for in)tan%eone of the pea+) of 'ha+e)peare0) dramati%a%hie&ementthere i) no linear progre))3 nothing happen), really,e*%ept that the %hara%ter) uggle with )imilaritie) and %ontra)t)3between the weather and human life, between appearan%e) andrealitie)< And it i) not only inLear that the %hain of )e?uentiality and%au)ality in 'ha+e)pearean tragedy pro&e) under )%rutiny to be%uriou)ly in)ub)tantial< 'tephen Booth ha) %on&in%inglydemon)trated how the opening of amletplunge) u) immediately intoa field of parado*e) and nonC)e?uitur) whi%h we )truggle in &ain tounite into a %oherent pattern of %au)e and effe%then%e, perhap), theea)e with whi%h Tom 'toppard grafted on to it hi) more e*pli%itlyab)urdi)t and metaphori%al(osencrant and 2uildenstern -re ead6&(t i) demon)trable that the plot of Othello allow) no time in whi%hDe)demona %ould ha&e %ommitted adultery with "a))iobut thatanomaly doe)n0t matter, and i) indeed rarely noti%ed in the theatre3 theplay i) built on %ontra)t)Othello0) bla%+ne)) with De)demona0)whitene)), hi) ealou)y again)t her inno%en%e, hi) nai&ety again)t

    (ago0) %unningnot %au)eCandCeffe%t< Othello0) )elfCu)tifying)olilo?uy, 0(t i) the %au)e, it i) the %au)e, my )oul0 =, ii, i %arrie) abitter irony, for there i) no %au)e3 not only i) De)demona inno%ent, but(ago0) mali%e ha) no real moti&e that i) why it i) )o effe%ti&e &odernists, Anti'odernists and Post'odernists

    I attended the e+t,res of the e*+eent )6 B6 B,rg,( ,nti SenatorM+"arth ended his ten,re6 I i(agined NK o,d &,rn6 Misera&est,dents drifting in the has oo5ed at one another6

    In ess than a (onth or5ing da and night I rote a &ad nove6I ent to s+hooHNK Mi+higan Ber5eeH(,+h of the ti(e6 I had

    itt gidd +onversation fo,r or five nights a ee5 in a ho(ose*,a &ar inAnn Ar&or6I read iterar revies the a .eo.e s,+5 +and6#ersona reationshi.s ere (ore i(.ortant to (e than anthing ese6I had a fight ith a .oerf, fat (an ho fe on ( fa+e and as

    i((ova&e6I had .ersona reationshi.s ith foot&a .aers FaJJ (,si+ians ass-

    &andits n(.ho(ania+s non-s.e+iaiJed degenerates and n,(ero,seish .re(edi+a st,dents6

    I had .ersona reationshi.s ith thirt-five rhes,s (on5es in ane*.eri(ent on (on5e addi+tion to (or.hine6 The 5ne (e as one hoshot ree5ing +ra. o,t of +ages ith a hose6>1

    The 0)tory0 hardly the right word, but there i) no other %ontinue) inthe )ame mode3 bald )tatement) of fa%t whi%h appear to ha&e nothing to

    %onne%t them e*%ept that they belong to the life of the narrator in the16:), and )eem to ha&e been )ele%ted at random from hi) totale*perien%e< There i) a +ind of re%urrent themethe politi%alimpoten%e of the 16:)but mo)t of the )tatement) made ha&enothing to do with it< (t0) a &ery ri)+y pro%edure, but it wor+) be%au)eof the %a)ual brillian%e of the writing and be%au)e the writer per)uade)u) that the di)%ontinuity of hi) te*t is the truth of hi) e*perien%e< 0(u)ed to thin+ that )omeday ( would write a fi%tional &er)ion of my)tupid life in the fiftie),0 )ay) the narrator at one point, and theimpli%ation i) that the raw ingredient) of that life heaped in front of u)%on)titute a more authenti% re%ord than would be any wellCmadeno&el66C Hemingway, Men Without Women I1/8J Harmond)worth, 14/

    pp< 6C5

    in New Uor+ in 155 and the )e%ond &er)ion, entitled 9ohn Thomas and

    Lad$ 9ane wa) publi)hed in London by Heinemann in 14