Upload
equality-case-files
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 8:14-cv-00356 #34
1/4
SUSAN WATERS et a l
Plain t i f fs
v
DAVE
HEINEMAN
et a l
Defendants
HAROLD WILSON
and
GRACY SEDLAK
Internenors
Flll:.L
1
T IC I
:,
UH
i ;
r
OF NE.it A KA
IN
THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .
- 5
p
1
2: 2
1
FOR THE DISTRICT
OF NEBRASKA
)
CASE NO. 8: 4 c v 0 0 0 3 ~ f i ,, F
1
.
E
)
INTERNENORS
OPPOSITION
Rf
r lC
t
::.
.
ln
) PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO
)
MOTION
TO
INTERVENE
)
)
)
)
)
)
The
Intervenors in the
above
action
do
hereby object to Plain t i f fs
Representatives
Brief in Opposition to Intervene
of
December 29, 2014
and
do aver
and
s ta te the
following:
A.Existing
Part ies DO
NOT
adequately
represent the Intervenors in teres ts .
Intervenors are
one
singler ly incarcerated and a
former inamte
of
the
Dept.
of
Corrections.
The Neb.
DCS
has f inal
author i ty to
deny
or approve any request by
a
current
inmate to marry. Plain t i f fs action does not
address
th is contingency
in
that
should the
Court
grant the Plain t i f fs request and injunction, i t would not necessari ly
effect
the Intervenors
in
any
way.
No
would
i t
address
the
denile
of
vis i ta t ion
by
the
Intervenors even i f they were allowed to marry legal ly .
8:14-cv-00356-JFB-TDT Doc # 34 Filed: 01/05/15 Page 1 of 4 - Page ID # 197
8/10/2019 8:14-cv-00356 #34
2/4
C P l a i n t i f f s act ion excludes transgender c i t i zens
from
obtaining the
right
to marry
s
t r ~ n s g e n d e r
individuals are
neither same
sex nor opposite sex to the male
and
female
genders. Thus they cannot
marry anyone
who is opposite gender
to
the
gender they present
themselves
to
be.
D
Intervenors
have
the
r ight to intervene in th i s act ion
Rule
24 i s
to be
l ibera l ly construed, however, any doubts resolved
in
favor of
the
proposed
Intervenors.
6-26 Moores
Federal
Pract ice-Civi l
2
4.03
E
Intervention should not be dsmissed
unl es s no
r e l i e f
poss ib le
Court accepts
as true
npnconclusionary allegations
of
motion to intervene
and motion
should
not be
dismissed
unless
i t appears to
cer t ianty that Intervenor
i s
not ent i t led
to
re l ief
under any se t of
fa t ts
that could be proved under complaint.
Reich v DBC/York
Estate Corp.
68 F.3d 316, 321
F
Intervenors
have
a
s ign i f i cant
protectable
in teres t in
being
l ega l ly
married
These in te res ts
include vis i ta t ion as spouses, property r ights
tax incent ives ,
as well as l i f e extending decisions to be
made
by one's spouse.
n
Appelant
has
a
sgfiificant protectable in te res t
in
intervention
i f
(1)
i t
asserts
an
in te res t tha t
i s
protected
under some law and
(2)
there is a relationship
between
i t s
legal ly
protected
in te res t
and
the
Pla in t i f f s
claims.
Donnelly v
Glickman
159
F.
3d
405,
409
G Intervenors
have
a spec i f i c
in teres t in P l a i n t i f f s act ions
i JI
8:14-cv-00356-JFB-TDT Doc # 34 Filed: 01/05/15 Page 2 of 4 - Page ID # 198
8/10/2019 8:14-cv-00356 #34
3/4
one or
the
other
intended spouse. Plain t i f fs have not
adequately
protected
the
interes ts of
Ms
Sedlak as a transgender female
who
could
declare herself legal ly
female
i f she
were
a
resident
of
such
s ta tes
as
New
Mexico.
amd
the Intervenors
could
legal ly marry
i f
they
were
able to
move
to
Iowa or
other surrounding s ta tes
were the
same
sex marriage
ban
has
been
ruled
unconsi tut ioonal/
Intervenors
aver
that the i r intervention
i s
not Permissive, bu by right of marraige since the
Supreme Court s
rul ing
on
DOMA
We
s ta te that
the
Court cannot
deny
our
motion
to Intervene as
i t
i s be our r ight to
do so.
Court erred
by
not acceptin
g
as true, al legations
of
evidence submitted
in
support of
motion to
intervene.
Southenn Centre for Biologicacl Diversi ty
v
Berg
268
F.2d 810, 819-820
Intervenors
here ci te the i r previous f i l ings
both
of Federal Court and in
State is tr ic t Court: 8:13cv-130
and
CI13-1225.
Intervenors are
e n t i t l e d to in jun t ive r e l i e f
and
ask for
such
Intervenors ask to have the immediate
r ight
to marry
granted and
to vi s i t
as
legal spouses, persuant
~ ~ ~
/137418
Box 22800
to
Neb R.R.S 251063.
Gracy
1035 Hartley
Lincoln, NE 68521
8:14-cv-00356-JFB-TDT Doc # 34 Filed: 01/05/15 Page 3 of 4 - Page ID # 199
8/10/2019 8:14-cv-00356 #34
4/4
Notice:
this correspondence was
mailed
from an
institution operated by the Nebraska
Department
of
Corrections. Its
~ i j ~ e n s o r e
Inmate Name:
Inmate
=v
P. 0 .
Box
22800
Lincoln , NE
68542-2800
u. kl
b,0 Ds
h{ J1 l ur
, \ )
6
~
I r \ ~
plO /o\
5-v\t \I s
0m1t\A1A..1t
-{
\bi \ ;
v-u
6 8 1 0 2 1 3 2 2
111I 1 1l1
1
IIII\1lI 11IlI 1III11II1IIII1
1
1
I11II1 I J l I
US
8:14-cv-00356-JFB-TDT Doc # 34 Filed: 01/05/15 Page 4 of 4 - Page ID # 200