8:14-cv-00356 #34

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 8:14-cv-00356 #34

    1/4

    SUSAN WATERS et a l

    Plain t i f fs

    v

    DAVE

    HEINEMAN

    et a l

    Defendants

    HAROLD WILSON

    and

    GRACY SEDLAK

    Internenors

    Flll:.L

    1

    T IC I

    :,

    UH

    i ;

    r

    OF NE.it A KA

    IN

    THE

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .

    - 5

    p

    1

    2: 2

    1

    FOR THE DISTRICT

    OF NEBRASKA

    )

    CASE NO. 8: 4 c v 0 0 0 3 ~ f i ,, F

    1

    .

    E

    )

    INTERNENORS

    OPPOSITION

    Rf

    r lC

    t

    ::.

    .

    ln

    ) PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO

    )

    MOTION

    TO

    INTERVENE

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    The

    Intervenors in the

    above

    action

    do

    hereby object to Plain t i f fs

    Representatives

    Brief in Opposition to Intervene

    of

    December 29, 2014

    and

    do aver

    and

    s ta te the

    following:

    A.Existing

    Part ies DO

    NOT

    adequately

    represent the Intervenors in teres ts .

    Intervenors are

    one

    singler ly incarcerated and a

    former inamte

    of

    the

    Dept.

    of

    Corrections.

    The Neb.

    DCS

    has f inal

    author i ty to

    deny

    or approve any request by

    a

    current

    inmate to marry. Plain t i f fs action does not

    address

    th is contingency

    in

    that

    should the

    Court

    grant the Plain t i f fs request and injunction, i t would not necessari ly

    effect

    the Intervenors

    in

    any

    way.

    No

    would

    i t

    address

    the

    denile

    of

    vis i ta t ion

    by

    the

    Intervenors even i f they were allowed to marry legal ly .

    8:14-cv-00356-JFB-TDT Doc # 34 Filed: 01/05/15 Page 1 of 4 - Page ID # 197

  • 8/10/2019 8:14-cv-00356 #34

    2/4

    C P l a i n t i f f s act ion excludes transgender c i t i zens

    from

    obtaining the

    right

    to marry

    s

    t r ~ n s g e n d e r

    individuals are

    neither same

    sex nor opposite sex to the male

    and

    female

    genders. Thus they cannot

    marry anyone

    who is opposite gender

    to

    the

    gender they present

    themselves

    to

    be.

    D

    Intervenors

    have

    the

    r ight to intervene in th i s act ion

    Rule

    24 i s

    to be

    l ibera l ly construed, however, any doubts resolved

    in

    favor of

    the

    proposed

    Intervenors.

    6-26 Moores

    Federal

    Pract ice-Civi l

    2

    4.03

    E

    Intervention should not be dsmissed

    unl es s no

    r e l i e f

    poss ib le

    Court accepts

    as true

    npnconclusionary allegations

    of

    motion to intervene

    and motion

    should

    not be

    dismissed

    unless

    i t appears to

    cer t ianty that Intervenor

    i s

    not ent i t led

    to

    re l ief

    under any se t of

    fa t ts

    that could be proved under complaint.

    Reich v DBC/York

    Estate Corp.

    68 F.3d 316, 321

    F

    Intervenors

    have

    a

    s ign i f i cant

    protectable

    in teres t in

    being

    l ega l ly

    married

    These in te res ts

    include vis i ta t ion as spouses, property r ights

    tax incent ives ,

    as well as l i f e extending decisions to be

    made

    by one's spouse.

    n

    Appelant

    has

    a

    sgfiificant protectable in te res t

    in

    intervention

    i f

    (1)

    i t

    asserts

    an

    in te res t tha t

    i s

    protected

    under some law and

    (2)

    there is a relationship

    between

    i t s

    legal ly

    protected

    in te res t

    and

    the

    Pla in t i f f s

    claims.

    Donnelly v

    Glickman

    159

    F.

    3d

    405,

    409

    G Intervenors

    have

    a spec i f i c

    in teres t in P l a i n t i f f s act ions

    i JI

    8:14-cv-00356-JFB-TDT Doc # 34 Filed: 01/05/15 Page 2 of 4 - Page ID # 198

  • 8/10/2019 8:14-cv-00356 #34

    3/4

    one or

    the

    other

    intended spouse. Plain t i f fs have not

    adequately

    protected

    the

    interes ts of

    Ms

    Sedlak as a transgender female

    who

    could

    declare herself legal ly

    female

    i f she

    were

    a

    resident

    of

    such

    s ta tes

    as

    New

    Mexico.

    amd

    the Intervenors

    could

    legal ly marry

    i f

    they

    were

    able to

    move

    to

    Iowa or

    other surrounding s ta tes

    were the

    same

    sex marriage

    ban

    has

    been

    ruled

    unconsi tut ioonal/

    Intervenors

    aver

    that the i r intervention

    i s

    not Permissive, bu by right of marraige since the

    Supreme Court s

    rul ing

    on

    DOMA

    We

    s ta te that

    the

    Court cannot

    deny

    our

    motion

    to Intervene as

    i t

    i s be our r ight to

    do so.

    Court erred

    by

    not acceptin

    g

    as true, al legations

    of

    evidence submitted

    in

    support of

    motion to

    intervene.

    Southenn Centre for Biologicacl Diversi ty

    v

    Berg

    268

    F.2d 810, 819-820

    Intervenors

    here ci te the i r previous f i l ings

    both

    of Federal Court and in

    State is tr ic t Court: 8:13cv-130

    and

    CI13-1225.

    Intervenors are

    e n t i t l e d to in jun t ive r e l i e f

    and

    ask for

    such

    Intervenors ask to have the immediate

    r ight

    to marry

    granted and

    to vi s i t

    as

    legal spouses, persuant

    ~ ~ ~

    /137418

    Box 22800

    to

    Neb R.R.S 251063.

    Gracy

    1035 Hartley

    Lincoln, NE 68521

    8:14-cv-00356-JFB-TDT Doc # 34 Filed: 01/05/15 Page 3 of 4 - Page ID # 199

  • 8/10/2019 8:14-cv-00356 #34

    4/4

    Notice:

    this correspondence was

    mailed

    from an

    institution operated by the Nebraska

    Department

    of

    Corrections. Its

    ~ i j ~ e n s o r e

    Inmate Name:

    Inmate

    =v

    P. 0 .

    Box

    22800

    Lincoln , NE

    68542-2800

    u. kl

    b,0 Ds

    h{ J1 l ur

    , \ )

    6

    ~

    I r \ ~

    plO /o\

    5-v\t \I s

    0m1t\A1A..1t

    -{

    \bi \ ;

    v-u

    6 8 1 0 2 1 3 2 2

    111I 1 1l1

    1

    IIII\1lI 11IlI 1III11II1IIII1

    1

    1

    I11II1 I J l I

    US

    8:14-cv-00356-JFB-TDT Doc # 34 Filed: 01/05/15 Page 4 of 4 - Page ID # 200