Upload
evangeline-payne
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8 December 1999 1
Institutional Structures and Arrangements at Public Sector
LaboratoriesLyndal Thorburn
Advance Consulting & Evaluation Pty LtdOECD Workshop on High Technology Spinoffs,
Working Group on Innovation and Technology Policy, 8 December 1999
8 December 1999 2
Public Sector Laboratories Total 194 direct spinoffs from Australian
research institutions. Of these• 92 from universities• 8 from hospitals• 14 from co-operative research centres
Remaining 82 from public sector labs• 56 from CSIRO• 11 from Medical Research Institutes• 3 from DSTO, 5 others
8 December 1999 3
CSIRO Structure & Aims
Science & Industry Research Act 1949 Conducts scientific research to assist
Australian industry Can own & control IP
• But not permitted to own a controlling interest in a co. without Ministerial approval
Also subject to FOI, Privacy, ADJR
8 December 1999 4
CSIRO Research Collaborative R&D; Contract research; Consulting; Licensing of formal intellectual property; Technical services; Research by 6,700 staff (96/97) covers
agribusiness, manufacturing, mining, environment, services
8 December 1999 5
Official Performance Indicators Sector profile External earnings Publications, reports, patents Customer satisfaction Adoption and impact of research and advice
• NOT spinoffs, but it recognises 3 types of startups: technology transfer companies (30), direct spinoffs (55), indirect spinoffs (20)
8 December 1999 6
CSIRO Commercial Outputs AUTM survey (1997)
• US universities, per 1000 “faculty”*, receive 37 disclosures, apply for 9 patents, negotiate 11 licence agreements, receive US$320,00 royalties
No Australian equivalent,but using AUTM standard in 1996/97 CSIRO should have applied for 60 patents (52) received US$2.1m royalties (US$4m) and produced 5 startups (2.5).
* Trune (1996)
8 December 1999 7
CSIRO Startups
Range of forces:• institutional• technological• profit• market
Finance rare Equity rare
8 December 1999 8
Stand-alone
CSIRO New Spinofflicence
royalties
staff
Individual shareholders
•Staff resign, redundancy, use $ for co. finance
8 December 1999 9
Joint Venture
CSIRO New Spinoff
licence
royalties
staffOne or more firms/agencies
licencestaff
royaltiesequity
equity
•CSIRO staff usually on leave without pay, funding from jv partners, CSIRO may have equity position
8 December 1999 10
Subsidiary of single existing firm
CSIRO New Spinofflicence
royalties
staff
Existing firm
staff/equity
•CSIRO staff resign or LWOP, funding from parent
8 December 1999 11
Public listing
CSIRO New Spinofflicence
royalties
staff
Public shareholdings
equity
8 December 1999 12
Medical Research Institutes (MRIs) Statute e.g. Garvan Institute of Medical
Research, Howard Florey Institute of Experimental Physiology
Company e.g.Austin Research Institute Approx 20 of these, AU$120m, 2000 staff Main aim is understanding & treatment of
disease
8 December 1999 13
MRI Commercial Outputs
No standardised performance indicators but annual reports concentrate on research activities, publications, conferences etc
Using same AUTM survey, expect 18 patent applications, $US0.64m royalties, 22 licence agreements, 1.2 startups in 96/97• no data available except known 0 startups that
year
8 December 1999 14
Wholly owned subsidiary
MRI
New Spinoff
licence
equity
royalties
Staff?
8 December 1999 15
Joint Venture
MRI New Spinoff
licence
royalties
Multiple research institutions or single firms
licencestaff
royaltiesequity
equity
•Spinoff staff are usually provided by the partner firm or are recruited directly; researchers stay within MRI•n = 1 (+2)
8 December 1999 16
Subsidiary of multiple owners
MRI New Spinofflicence
royalties
staff
VC and other private investors
equity
•Spinoff driven by finance opportunity, MRI staff p/t in firm
8 December 1999 17
Summary of Models
SA JV WOS PL SSF SMO Un-known
Total
CSIRO 30 19 0 3 3 0 0 55
MRI 0 3 6 0 0 1 1 11
TOTAL 30 22 6 3 3 1 1 66
8 December 1999 18
Issues
Spinoff rates influenced by• Basic vs applied focus• Commercial imperatives• Commercial focus• Finance
Spinoff structures influenced by • Legal status• Perceptions of risk