Upload
nach-baharin
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
1/31
SIME DARBY PROPERTIES REALTY SDN. BHD.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF 71 UNITSDOUBLE STOREY LINK HOUSE (26 X 75) AT PHASE 1B, ON
LOT PT. 11406 HSB 135440, NILAI IMPIAN, MUKIMSENTUL,DAERAH SEREMBAN, NEGERI SEMBILAN DARUL
KHUSUS, FOR MESSRS SIME DARBY PROPERTIES REALTYSDN. BHD.
CONTRACT NO: NI/P-NI1B/DBL/10/016
DECLARATION
This Tender Report is prepared by the undersigned for the above project and allreviews made are based on the Tender Documents received only.
MITG GROUP SDN. BHD.
MOHD ADNAN SUHOT
1
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
2/31
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 TITLE OF PROJECT
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF 71 UNITS
DOUBLE STOREY LINK HOUSE (26 X 75) AT PHASE 1B, ON LOTPT. 11406 HSB 135440, NILAI IMPIAN, MUKIM SENTUL,DAERAHSEREMBAN, NEGERI SEMBILAN DARUL KHUSUS, FOR MESSRSSIME DARBY PROPERTIES REALTY SDN. BHD.
CONTRACT NO: NI/P-NI1B/DBL/10/016
1.2 BRIEF INFORMATION OF TENDER
a) Consultant Pre-Tender Estimate : RM 19,980,108.82
b) Date of Closing of Tender : 24th March 2011
b) Fixed Completion Period of Contract : 52 weeks
c) Tender Validity Period : 120 days
d) Expiry Date of Tender Validity Period: 22nd July 2011
e) Type of Tender : Tender by Invitation/Selective Tenderingfrom Employersapproved list
f) Type of Contract : Bill of Quantities FormPart of the Contract
g) Tender bond : RM 10,000.00
h) Performance Bond : 5% of Contract Sum
i) L.A.D (Mock-up Unit) : RM 500.00/Unit/Day(Whole Works) : RM 10,300.00/Day
2
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
3/31
1.3 CONSULTANTS FOR THE PROJECT:
a)Architect : Visage Architect Sdn. Bhd.
b) Civil Engineer : Ranhill Bersekutu Sdn. Bhd.
c) Structural Engineer : JPI Sdn. Bhd
d) Mechanical and Electrical Engineer : PE Associates Sdn. Bhd
e) Quantity Surveyor : MITG Group Sdn. Bhd.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORKS
The Works let on this contract are as follows:
a) Preliminaries and General Conditions
b) Anti-termite Chemical Treatment
c) Building Works
d) Infrastructure Works (Provisional Quantities)
e) Mock-up Units
f) Mechanical & Electrical Works
3.0 THE TENDER
The tender is based on Bills of Quantities which form part of the contract inaccordance with the Agreement and Conditions of PAM Contract 2006
Private Edition with Quantities. No adjustment in the tendered sum will beallowed. However, if there are changes in the scope of works ordered by theEmployer, these will be treated as variations and adjustments to the tenderedsum. The tendered rates will be used as a basis for valuation of suchvariations.
3
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
4/31
4.0 CALLING OF TENDER
The tender was based on selective tendering. Fifteen (15) pre-qualifiedtenderers (selection done by the Employer) were invited by the Employer tosubmit tenders for this project.
The documents were made available to tenderers commencing 24 th February2011. Ten (10) tenderers responded to the tender invitation.
All tenderers were required to submit their tenders on the stipulated time viz.,not later than 12 noon on 24th March 2011 at the office of:
Contract Management DepartmentSime Darby Property Berhad
Operation Office,20, Jalan Astaka U8/82,Seksyen U8, Bukit Jelutong,40150 Shah Alam,Selangor Darul Ehsan.
5.0 TENDERS RECEIVED
The tenders were opened at the office of Messrs. Sime Darby Property Berhad(Contract Management Department). All the Ten (10) tenderers that
responded to the invitation, submitted their tenders on or before the stipulateddate and time.
All the tender documents were then reverted to the office of the ConsultingQuantity Surveyor on 24th March 2011. The detailed analysis and tenderevaluation focused on five (5) lowest tenders only as other five (5) tenderersoffer were higher. It is unlikely that the offer will be neither considered foracceptance nor beneficial to the Employer. The tabulation of the tendersreceived arranged in ascending order is depicted in Table 1 of Page 5. (Referalso Schedule of Tender Opening)
There was one (1) no. Addendum issued and all the ten tenderers haveincluded it in their tender.
4
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
5/31
5
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
6/31
Table 1 - Tenders Received in Ascending Order
Fixed CompletionPeriod
Open Completion Period
Code Tenderer Position
TenderSum (RM)
24 MonthDefect
LiabilityPeriod
TenderSum (RM)
with 60MonthDefect
LiabilityPeriod
TenderSum (RM)
24 MonthDefect
LiabilityPeriod
Completion Period(Weeks)
TenderSum (RM)
with 60MonthDefect
LiabilityPeriod
Completion Period(Weeks)
Remarks
6/10PA BUILDERS
SDN BHD1 21,788,000.00 25,668,000.00 23,993,311.21 48 27,873,311.21 48
2/10AL AMBIA SDNBHD
2 22,210,895.91 - --
--
7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE
SDN BHD
3 22,602,103.95 - --
--
8/10 SRI MANSANGSDN BHD
4 23,820,000.00 25,820,000.00 --
--
4/10 IDAMAN IKHLASSDN BHD
5 23,863,048.94 24,113,048.94 --
--
6
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
7/31
Fixed CompletionPeriod
Open Completion Period
Code Tenderer PositionTender
Sum (RM)24 Month
Defect
LiabilityPeriod
TenderSum (RM)
with 60Month
DefectLiabilityPeriod
TenderSum (RM)24 Month
Defect
LiabilityPeriod
Completion Period
(Weeks)
TenderSum (RM)
with 60Month
DefectLiabilityPeriod
Completion Period
(Weeks)
Remarks
10/10JALLCON SDNBHD
6 23,980,000.00 25,880.000.00
3/10 MAKASSAR SDNBHD
7 25,500,000.00 25,800,000.00 25,500,000.00 52 25,800,000.00 52
5/10 TIMUR KAYASDN BHD
8 26,419,690.35 27,619,690.35 - - - -
1/10 AIMACONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD
9 27,574,685.30 28,677,672.7029,523,911.35 65 30,704,867.80 65
9/10 BUMIMETROCONSTRUCTION SDN BHD
10 29,190,073.80 -- - - -
7
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
8/31
Arithmetical checks were carried out on all tenders. Errors were found in all thetenders. The errors were due to mistakes in multiplying, addition and transfer. Theerrors subsequently change the tenderers position. The tenders, the corrected tendersum and their revised position are depicted below.
Table 3 - Corrected Tender Sum due to Arithmetical Error:
8
Code Tenderer Original Tender
Sum( RM )
OriginalPosition
CorrectedTender Sum
( RM )
Arithmetical Check
RevisedPosition
Remarks
Error (RM) %
6/10PA BUILDERSSDN BHD
21,788,000.00 1 21,786,942.60 -1,057.40 -0.0049 1
2/10AL AMBIA SDNBHD
22,210,895.91 2 23,027,144.88 +816,248.97 +3.6750 2 Wrong M&Etransfer
7/10 GLOBAL GLOBESDN BHD
22,602,103.95 3 23,375,071.95 +772,968.00 +3.4199 4Wrong M&E
transfer
8/10 SRI MANSANGSDN BHD
23,820,000.00 4 23,821,155.80 +1,155.80 +0.0049 5
4/10 IDAMAN IKHLASSDN BHD
23,863,048.94 5 23,862,985.04 -63.90 -0.0003 6
10/10JALLCON SDNBHD
23,980,000.00 6 23,159,983.00 -820,017.00 -3.4196 3Wrong M&E
transfer
3/10 MAKASSAR SDNBHD
25,500,000.00 7 25,508,996.40 +8,996.40 +0.0353 7
5/10 TIMUR KAYASDN BHD
26,419,690.35 8 26,442,173.35 +22,483.00 +0.0851 8
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
9/31
The Tendered Sum shall be the basis of acceptance of tender and not the CorrectedTotal. Any error found, shall be rationalized prior to signing of Contract.
9
Code Tenderer Original Tender
Sum( RM )
OriginalPosition
CorrectedTender Sum
( RM )
Arithmetical CheckRevisedPosition
Remark
Error (RM) %
1/10AIMACONSTRUCTIONSDN. BHD
27,574,685.30 9 27,577,301.02 +2,615.72 +0.0095 9
9/10BUMIMETROCONSTRUCTIONSDN BHD
29,190,073.80 10 30,314,446.63 +1,124,372.83 +3.8519 10Arithmet
Error Genera
Summa
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
10/31
6.0 ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF TENDERS
The tenders were evaluated based on the financial or commercial proposalonly. Since the tender was based on selective tendering, tenderers selectedwere deemed to be capable in carrying out the proposed work to warrantinvitation. Hence, we did not analyse the tenderers capabilities in terms ofexperience and resources.
The criteria of the evaluation in descending order of importance are as follows:
6.1 Tender documents duly filled in and a formal offer made (Sufficiency ofTenders submitted).
6.2 Competitiveness and reasonableness of tender.
6.3 Pricing all sections of the tender documents and Bills of Quantities.
All tender documents are checked to ensure that tenderers had made validand proper offers. A full checklist/analysis is given in the following appendices:
Appendix A - Breakdown of Tender by SectionAppendix B - Breakdown of Building Works per UnitAppendix C (i) - Elemental Cost Breakdown for Building Works
(Type A)Appendix C (ii) - Elemental Cost Breakdown for Building Works
(Type B)Appendix D - Comparison of Major Rates
Our evaluation was based on comparative analysis between our Pre-Tenderestimate and the Tenderers submission.
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION
10
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
11/31
7.1 Tenderer 6/10 PA BUILDERS SDN. BHD.
The tenderer made a valid and proper offer and complied with all major tenderrequirements. The tenderer submitted a complete tender.
The Tenderer submitted the lowest offer and the arithmetical error are foundbut the error does not affect the contractors ranking. The tenderers overalloffer is within the acceptable margin of +/- 10%, i.e. 9.05% higher than the
QS estimate.
11
Tender Sum(RM)
CorrectedTender Sum
(RM)
Error OriginalPosition
RevisedPosition
21,788,000.00 21,786,942.60 -1,057.40(-0.0049%)
1 1
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
12/31
12
DescriptionTenderer
(RM)Qs Estimate
Differencewith estimate
PercentageDifference %
Preliminaries 1,109,305.11 920,000.00 +189,305.11 +20.57
BuildingWorks
Type A
Type B
6,954,576.65
7,168,724.24
5,862,369.52
6,050,856.88
+1,092,207.13
+1,117,867.36
+18.63
+18.47
External
Works WithinLot Boundary 131,267.00 135,996.40 -4,699.40 -3.46
Anti TermiteTreatment
49,230.00 61,076.00 -11,846.00 -19.40
Mock Up Unit 20,000.00 10,000.00 +10,000.00 +100.00
Mechanical &ElectricalWorks
1,000,469.00 2,272,000.00 -1,271,531.00 -55.97
ExternalInfrastructure
3,808,062.00 2,964,652.00 +843,410.00 +28.45
Lighting andTelephone
Infrastructure
340,820.00 360,650.02 -19,830.02 -5.50
Prime CostSum &
ProvisionalSum
818,000.00 800,000.00 +18,000.00 +2.25
Tender Sum 21,788,000.00 19,980,106.82 +1,807,893.18 +9.05
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
13/31
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
7.1 Tenderer 6/10 PA BUILDERS SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
The pricing for Preliminaries is higher i.e. 20.57% higher than the QSestimate. The preliminaries price at RM 1,109,305.11 or 5.60% of the tendersum is considered acceptable.
The overall cost for building works is higher, i.e. Type A (+18.63%) and TypeB (+18.47%) higher than the QS estimate.
The cost per m2 GFA for typical unit (intermediate unit) is RM80.67 is higherthan the QS estimate which is RM67.95.
The following rates are considered high that caused the major differencebetween the tenderer and the QS estimate :-
The rates/pricing for Infrastructure Works is higher, i.e. 28.45% higher thanthe QS estimate.
The rates/pricing for External Telephone Infra and Street Lighting Service- 5.50% lower than the Engineer estimate.
The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is higher, i.e -55.97% lowerthan the Engineer estimate.
Comparison in the prices offered are as depicted in Appendix A-D.
13
Item QtyQtyRate (RM)Rate (RM) Amount (RM)Amount (RM)
UnitUnitTotal Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferencDifferenc
with QS (Rwith QS (R
QS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer
HalfSlab
80 75.00/m 265.00/m265.00/m 6,000.00 21,200.00 71 426,000.00 1,505,200.00 1,079,200.0
AcotecWall
190 55.00/m 74.20/m74.20/m 10,450.00 14,098.00 71 741,950.00 1,000,958.00 259,008.0
TOTAL 1,167,950.00 2,506,158.00 1,338,208.0
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
14/31
7.2 Tenderer 2/10 AL AMBIA SDN. BHD.
The tenderer made a valid and proper offer and complied with all major tenderrequirements.
The tenderer submitted the second lowest offer with the arithmetical error of+RM816, 248.97, mainly due to wrong M&E transfer. Their corrected tenderamount is actually higher at RM 23,027,144.88 but the error does not changethe tenderers ranking. The tenderers overall offer i.e. 11.17% higher thanthe QS estimate.
14
Tender Sum(RM)
CorrectedTender Sum
(RM)Error
OriginalPosition
RevisedPosition
22,210,895.91 23,027,144.88 +816,248.97(+3.6750%) 2 2
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
15/31
15
DescriptionTenderer
(RM)Qs Estimate
Differencewith estimate
PercentageDifference %
Preliminaries 1,013,644.00 920,000.00 +93,644.00 +10.18
BuildingWorks
Type A
Type B
6,748,207.50
6,962,028.08
5,862,369.52
6,050,856.88
+885,837.98
+911,171.20
+15.11
+15.06
ExternalWorks WithinLot Boundary
153,909.30 135,996.40 +17,912.90 +13.17
Anti TermiteTreatment
64,981.40 61,076.00 +3,905.40 +6.39
Mock Up Unit 67,288.00 10,000.00 +57,288.00 +572.88
Mechanical &Electrical
Works626,362.00 2,272,000.00 -1,645,638.00 -72.43
ExternalInfrastructure
4,901,376.83 2,964,652.00 +1,936,724.83 +65.33
Lighting andTelephone
Infrastructure
432,475.80 360,650.02 +71,825.78 +19.92
Prime CostSum &
ProvisionalSum
824,000.00 800,000.00 +24,000.00 +3.00
Tender Sum 22,210,895.91 19,980,106.82 +2,230,789.09 +11.17
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
16/31
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
7.2 Tenderer 2/10 AL AMBIA SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
The pricing for Preliminaries is generally lower i.e. 10.18% higher than theQS estimate. The preliminaries price at RM 1,013,644.00 or 4.98% of thetender sum is considered acceptable.
The total cost for building works is higher, i.e. Type A (+15.11%) and Type B(+15.06%)higher than the QS estimate.
The following rates are considered high that caused the major differencebetween the tenderer and the QS estimate :-
16
Item QtyQty
Rate (RM)Rate (RM) Amount (RM)Amount (RM)
UnitUnit
Total Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM)DifferenceDifference
with QSwith QS(RM)(RM)
QS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer
Fwk tosides of
slab188 8.00/m 17.00/m17.00/m 1,504.00 3,196.00 71 106,784.00 226,916.00 120,132.00
Half slab 80 75.00/m 88.80/m88.80/m 6,000.00 7,105.00 71 426,000.00 504,384.00 78,384.00
100mmskirting
16 5.00/m 16.90/m16.90/m 80.00 270.40 71 5,680.00 19,198.40 12,518.40
175mmriser
23 9.00/m 28.80/m28.80/m 32.80 276.00 71 14,697.00 47,030.40 32,333.40
Nosing 23 5.00/m 26.10/m26.10/m 115.00 600.30 71 8,165.00 42,621.30 34,456.30
Half bwl 102 28.00/m 41.20/m41.20/m 2,856.00 4,202.20 71 202,776.00 298,370.40 95,594.40
Acotec wall 190 55.00/m 70.10/m70.10/m 10,450.00 13,319.00 71 741,950.00 945,649.00 203,699.00
Plaster 98 10.00/m 18.70/m18.70/m 980.00 1,832.60 71 69,580.00 130,114.60 60,534.60
`TOTAL C/F 1,595,228.00 2,267,846.50 672,618.50
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
17/31
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
7.2 Tenderer 2/10 AL AMBIA SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
The cost per m2 GFA for typical unit (intermediate unit) is RM78.03 is higherthan the QS estimate which is RM67.95.
The rates/pricing for Infrastructure Works are higher, i.e. 65.33% higher thanthe QS estimate.
The rates/pricing for External Telephone Infra and Street Lighting Service19.92% higher than the Engineer estimate.
The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is very high, i.e -72.43% lowerthan the Engineer Estimate some arithmeticalarithmetical error during transfer to generalsummary.
Comparison in the prices offered are as depicted in Appendix A-D.
17
Item QtyQtyRate (RM)Rate (RM) Amount (RM)Amount (RM)
UnitUnitTotal Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferenceDifference
with QS (Rwith QS (R
QS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer
Total B/F 1,595,228.00 2,267,846.50 672,618.5
400mm x400mm
tiles78 47.00/m 80.10/m80.10/m 3,666.00 6,247.80 71 260,286.00 443,593.80 183,307.8
Pegola 4 120.00/no 1,062.60/no1,062.60/no 480.00 4,250.40 71 34,080.00 301,778.40 267,698.4
Refuse bin 1 800.00/no 1,744.80/no1,744.80/no 800.00 1,744.80 71 56,800.00 123,880.80 67,080.80
TNB 1 800.00/no 1,058.20/no1,058.20/no 800.00 1,058.20 71 56,800.00 75,132.20 18,332.20
Surface
water
drain
900mmwide
83 350.00/m 1,210.00/m1,210.00/m 29,050.00 100,430.00 - - - 71,380.00
750mmwide
23 290.00/m 1.155.00/m1.155.00/m 6,670.00 26,565.00 - - - 19,895.00
600mmwide
195 230.00/m 1,078.00/m1,078.00/m 44,620.00 209,132.00 - - - 164,512.0
450mmwide
53 175.00/m 1,023.00/m1,023.00/m 9,275.00 54,219.00 - - - 44,944.00
Ditto, avgdpth
222 140.00/m 880.00/m880.00/m 31,080.00 195,360.00 - - - 164,280.0
Precastblock drain
1,344 120.00/m 517.00/m517.00/m 161,280.00 694,848.00 - - - 533,568.0
TOTAL 2,285,169.00 4,492,785.70 2,207,616.7
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
18/31
7.3 Tenderer 7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE SDN. BHD.
The tenderer made a valid and proper offer and complied with all major tenderrequirements.
The tenderers overall offer is i.e. 13.12% higher than the QS estimate which
is 3
rd
lowest tenderer. There is an error of +RM772,968.00 or +3.4199%mainly due to wrong M&E transfer. The error when corrected changed thecontractors ranking from 3rd to 4th.
18
Tender Sum(RM)
CorrectedTender Sum
(RM)
ErrorOriginalPosition
RevisedPosition
22,602,103.95 23,375,071.95 +772,968.00(+3.4199%)
3 4
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
19/31
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
7.3 Tenderer 7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
19
DescriptionTenderer
(RM) Qs EstimateDifference
with estimatePercentage
Difference %
Preliminaries 630,000.00 920,000.00 -290,000.00 -31.52
BuildingWorks
Type A
Type B
7,190,373.05
7,426,721.40
5,862,369.52
6,050,856.88
+1,328,003.53
+1,375,864.52
+22.65
+22.74
ExternalWorks WithinLot Boundary
270,990.50 135,996.40 +134,994.10 +99.26
Anti TermiteTreatment
26,615.00 61,076.00 -34,461.00 -56.42
Mock Up Unit 223,000.00 10,000.00 +213,000.00 +2,130.00
Mechanical &Electrical
Works560,190.00 2,272,000.00 -1,711,810.00 -75.34
External
Infrastructure
4,557,382.00 2,964,652.00 +1,592,730.00 +53.72
Lighting andTelephone
Infrastructure393,061.00 360,650.02 +32,410.98 +8.99
Prime CostSum &
ProvisionalSum
806,000.00 800,000.00 +6,000.00 +0.75
Tender Sum 22,602,103.95 19,980,106.82 +2,621,997.13 +13.12
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
20/31
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
7.3 Tenderer 7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
The pricing for Preliminaries is generally lower i.e. -31.52% lower than the QSestimate. The preliminaries price at RM 630,000.00 or 2.98% of the tendersum is considered low.
The total building works is i.e. Type A (22.65%) and Type B (22.74%) higherthan the QS estimate
The following rates are considered high that caused the major differencebetween the tenderer and the QS estimate :-
20
ItemQtyQty
Rate (RM)Rate (RM) Amount (RM)Amount (RM)
UnitUnit
Total Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferenceDifference
with QS (RMwith QS (RMQS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer
100mmskirting
16 5.00/m 35.00/m35.00/m 80.00 560.00 71 5,680.00 39,760.00 34,080.00
175mmriser
23 9.00/m 35.00/m35.00/m 207.00 805.00 71 14,697.00 57,155.00 78,384.00
225mmtread
23 5.00/m 35.00/m35.00/m 276.00 805.00 71 5,680.00 19,198.40 12,518.40
Nosing 23 5.00/m 35.00/m35.00/m 115.00 805.00 71 8,165.00 42,621.30 34,456.30
Half bwl 102 28.00/m 36.00/m36.00/m 2,856.00 3,672.00 71 202,776.00 298,370.40 95,594.40
Acotec wall 190 55.00/m 70.10/m70.10/m 10,450.00 13,319.00 71 741,950.00 945,649.00 203,699.00
Plaster 98 10.00/m 16.00/m16.00/m 980.00 1,568.00 71 69,580.00 130,114.60 60,534.60
400mm x400mm tile
78 47.00/m 86.00/m86.00/m 3,666.00 6,708.00 71 260,286.00 476,268.00 215,982.00
Skirting 73 5.00/m 40.00/m40.00/m 365.00 2,920.00 71 25,915.00 207,320.00 181,405.00
UAC 47 32.00/m 70.00/m70.00/m 1,504.00 3.290.00 71 106,784.00 233,590.00 126,806.00
Plasterboard
121 45.00/m 70.00/m70.00/m 5,445.00 8,470.00 71 386,595.00 601,370.00 214,775.00
TOTAL C/F 1,842,024.00 2,911,213.00 1,068,189.00
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
21/31
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
7.3 Tenderer 7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
21
Item QtyQty
Rate (RM)Rate (RM) Amount (RM)Amount (RM)
UnitUnit
Total Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferencDifferenc
with QS (Rwith QS (R
QS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer
Total B/F 1,842,024.00 2,911,213.00 1,068,189
Broomfinish
34 5.00/m 45.00/m45.00/m 170.00 1,540.00 71 12.070.00 108,630.00 96,560.0
Pebblewash
8 40.00/m 150.00/m150.00/m 320.00 1,200.00 71 22,720.00 85,200.00 62,480.0
Gate 1 1,000.00/no 2,000.00/no2,000.00/no 1,000.00 2,000.00 71 71,000.00 142,000.00 71,000.0
Refuse bin 1 800.00/no 1,800.00/no1,800.00/no 800.00 1800.00 71 56,800.00 127,800.00 71,000.0
TNB 1 800.00/no 1,200.00/no1,200.00/no 800.00 1,200.00 71 56,800.00 85,200.00 28,400.0
Pegola 4 120.00/no 500.00/no500.00/no 480.00 2,000.00 71 34,080.00 142,000.00 107,920.
900mmwide drain
83 350.00/m 1,500.00/m1,500.00/m 29,050.00 124,500.00 - - - 95,450.0
750mmwide ditto
23 290.00/m 900.00/m900.00/m 6,670.00 20,700.00 - - - 14,030.0
600mmwide ditto
195 230.00/m 750.00/m750.00/m 44,620.00 145,500.00 - - - 100,880.
450mmwide ditto
53 175.00/m 450.00/m450.00/m 9,275.00 23,850.00 - - - 14,575.0
Ditto, avgdpth exc
1.5222 140.00/m 350.00/m350.00/m 31,080.00 77,700.00 - - - 46,620.0
Precastblock drain
1,344 120.00/m 350.00/m350.00/m 161,280.00 470,400.00 - - - 309,120.
Crusher run 4,306 13.50/m 23.00/m23.00/m 58,131.00 99,038.00 - - - 40,907.0
Conc.Wearing
4,306 15.20/m 24.00/m24.00/m 65,451.20 103,344.00 - - - 37,892.8
Kerb 3.107 30.00/m 78.00/no78.00/no 93,210.00 242,346.00 - - - 149,136.
TOTAL 2,594,261.20 4,909,421.00 2,315,159
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
22/31
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
7.3 Tenderer 7/10 GLOBAL GLOBE SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
The cost per m2 GFA GFA for typical unit (intermediate unit) is RM83.73 ishigher than the QS estimate which is RM67.95.
The rates/pricing for Infrastructure Works are higher, i.e. 53.72% higher thanthe QS estimate.
The rates/pricing for External Telephone Infra and Street Lighting Service8.99% higher than the Engineer estimate.
The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is lower, i.e -75.34% lowerthan Engineer Estimate and some arithmeticalarithmetical error during transfer to generalsummary.
7.3 Tenderer 8/10 SRI MANSANG SDN. BHD.
The tenderer made a valid and proper offer and complied with all major tenderrequirements.
The tenderers overall offer is i.e. 19.22% higher than the QS estimate.There is an error of +RM1,155.80 or +0.0049% mainly due to amount transferto summary. The error when corrected changed the contractors ranking from4th to 5th.
22
Tender Sum(RM)
CorrectedTender Sum
(RM)Error
OriginalPosition
RevisedPosition
23,820,000.00 23,821,155.80 +1,155.80(+0.0049)
4 5
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
23/31
23
DescriptionTenderer
(RM)Qs Estimate
Differencewith estimate
PercentageDifference %
Preliminaries 2,320,502.10 920,000.00 +1,400,502.10 +152.23
BuildingWorks
Type A
Type B
6,904,454.21
7,121,870.60
5,862,369.52
6,050,856.88
+1,042,084.69
+1,071,013.72
+17.78
+17.70
ExternalWorks WithinLot Boundary
185,862.90 135,996.40 +49,866.50 +36.67
Anti TermiteTreatment
67,076.00 61,076.00 +6,000.00 +9.82
Mock Up Unit 145,110.00 10,000.00 +135,110.00 +1,351.00
Mechanical &Electrical
Works1,205,221.00 2,272,000.00 -1,066,779.00 -46.95
ExternalInfrastructure
4,241,352.00 2,964,652.00 +1,276,700.00 +43..06
Lighting andTelephone
Infrastructure
442,854.00 360,650.02 +82,203.98 +22.79
Prime CostSum &
ProvisionalSum
824,000.00 800,000.00 +24,000.00 +3.00
Tender Sum 23,820,000.00 19,980,106.82 +3,839,891.18 +19.22
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
24/31
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
7.3 Tenderer 8/10 SRI MANSANG SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
The pricing for Preliminaries is generally higher i.e. 152.23% higher than theQS estimate. The preliminaries price at RM 2,320,502.10 or 11.22% of thetender sum is considered high.
The total building works is i.e. Type A (17.78%) and Type B (17.70%)higherthan the QS estimate
The following rates are considered high that caused the major differencebetween the tenderer and the QS estimate :-
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
24
Item QtyQtyRate (RM)Rate (RM) Amount (RM)Amount (RM)
UnitUnitTotal Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferenceDifference
with QS (RMwith QS (RM
QS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer
Half slab 80 75.00/m 122.00/m122.00/m 6,000.00 9,150.00 71 426,000.00 649,650.00 223,650.00
Half bwl 102 28.00/m 43.00/m43.00/m 2,856.00 4,386.00 71 202,776.00 311,406.00 108,630.00
Plaster 98 10.00/m 16.92/m16.92/m 980.00 1,658.16 71 69,580.00 117,729.36 48,149.36
Broomfinish
34 5.00/m 28.00/m28.00/m 170.00 952.00 71 12,070.00 67,592.00 55,552.00
Pebblewash
8 40.00/m 98.00/m98.00/m 320.00 784.00 71 22,720.00 55,664.00 32,944.00
Gate 1 1,000.00/no 3,400.00/no3,400.00/no 1,000.00 3,400.00 71 71,000.00 241,400.00 170,400.00
Refuse bin 1 800.00/no 2,780.00/no2,780.00/no 800.00 2,780.00 71 56,800.00 197,380.00 140,580.00
TNB 1 800.00/no 1,800.00/no1,800.00/no 800.00 1,800.00 71 56,800.00 127,800.00 71,000.00
Pegola 4 120.00/no 990.00/no990.00/no 480.00 3.960.00 71 34,080.00 281,160.00 247,080.00
TOTAL C/F 951,826.00 2,049,781.36 1,097,955.36
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
25/31
7.3 Tenderer 8/10 SRI MANSANG SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
The cost per m2 GFA GFA for typical unit (intermediate unit) is RM79.84 ishigher than the QS estimate which is RM67.95.
The rates/pricing for Infrastructure Works are higher, i.e. 43.06% higher thanthe QS estimate.
The rates/pricing for External Telephone Infra and Street Lighting Service22.79% higher than the Engineer estimate.
The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is lower, i.e -46.95% lowerthan Engineer Estimate.
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
25
Item QtyQtyRate (RM)Rate (RM) Amount (RM)Amount (RM)
UnitUnitTotal Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferencDifferenc
with QS (Rwith QS (R
QS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer
Total B/F 951,826.00 2,049,781.36 1,097,955
900mmwide drain
83 350.00/m 695.00/m695.00/m 29,050.00 57,685.00 - - - 28,635.0
750mmwide ditto
23 290.00/m 650.00/m650.00/m 6,670.00 14,950.00 - - - 8,280.0
600mmwide ditto
195 230.00/m 570.00/m570.00/m 44,620.00 110,580.00 - - - 65,960.0
450mmwide ditto
53 175.00/m 583.00/m583.00/m 9,275.00 30,899.00 - - - 21,624.0
Ditto, exc1.5m
222 140.00/m 514.00/m514.00/m 31,080.00 114,108.00 - - - 83,028.0
Precastblock drain
1,344 120.00/m 448.00/m448.00/m 161,280.00 602,112.00 - - - 440,832.
DIsposal 11,961 5.00/m 20.00/m20.00/m 58,131.00 239,220.00 - - - 179,415.
TOTAL 1,293,606.00 3,2193,35.36 1,925,729
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
26/31
7.3 Tenderer 4 /10 IDAMAN IKHLAS SDN. BHD.
The tenderer made a valid and proper offer and complied with all major tenderrequirements.
The tenderers overall offer is i.e. 19.43% higher than the QS estimate.
26
Tender Sum(RM)
CorrectedTender Sum
(RM)
ErrorOriginalPosition
RevisedPosition
23,863,048.94 23,862,985.04 -63.90(-0.0003)
5 6
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
27/31
27
DescriptionTenderer
(RM)Qs Estimate
Differencewith estimate
PercentageDifference %
Preliminaries 1,300,000.00 920,000.00 +380,000.00 +41.30
BuildingWorks
Type A
Type B
7,271,238.55
7,493,441.32
5,862,369.52
6,050,856.88
+1,408,869.03
+1,442,584.44
+24.03
+23.84
ExternalWorks WithinLot Boundary
173,514.46 135,996.40 +37,518.06 +27.59
Anti TermiteTreatment
61,340.58 61,076.00 +264.58 +0.43
Mock Up Unit 43,805.53 10,000.00 +33,805.53 +338.06
Mechanical &Electrical
Works1,243,540.11 2,272,000.00 -1,028,459.89 -45.27
ExternalInfrastructure
4,629,804.79 2,964,652.00 +1,665,152.79 +56.17
Lighting and
TelephoneInfrastructure
400,204.49 360,650.02 +39,554.47 +10.97
Prime CostSum &
ProvisionalSum
824,000.00 800,000.00 +18,000.00 +2.25
Tender Sum 23,820,000.00 19,980,106.82 +3,882,940.12 +19.43
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
28/31
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
7.3 Tenderer 4/10 IDAMAN IKHLAS SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
The pricing for Preliminaries is generally higher i.e. 41.30% higher than theQS estimate. The preliminaries price at RM 1,300,000.00 or 5.99% of thetender sum is considered acceptable.
The total building works is i.e. Type A (24.30%) and Type B (23.84%)higherthan the QS estimate
The following rates are considered high that caused the major differencebetween the tenderer and the QS estimate :-
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
28
Item QtyQtyRate (RM)Rate (RM) Amount (RM)Amount (RM)
UnitUnitTotal Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferenceDifference
with QS (RMwith QS (RM
QS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer
Half slab 80 75.00/m 154.18/m154.18/m 6,000.00 11,563.50 71 426,000.00 821,008.50 395,008.50
Roof 117 58.93/m 98.55/m98.55/m 7,000.11 11,530.35 71 497,007.81 818,654.85 321,647.04
Half bwl 102 28.00/m 40.73/m40.73/m 2,856.00 4,154.46 71 202,776.00 294,966.66 92,190.66
Plaster 98 10.00/m 29.04/m29.04/m 980.00 2,845.92 71 69,580.00 202,060.32 132,480.32
Pebblewash
8 40.00/m 101.48/m101.48/m 320.00 811.84 71 22,720.00 55,664.00 32,944.00
Refuse bin 1 800.00/no 2,371.36/no2,371.36/no 800.00 2,371.36 71 56,800.00 168,366.56 111,566.56
TNB 1 800.00/no 1,252.65/no1,252.65/no 800.00 1,252.65 71 56,800.00 88,938.15 32,138.15
Pegola 4 120.00/no 618.37/no618.37/no 480.00 2,473.48 71 34,080.00 175,617.08 141,537.08
TOTAL C/F 1,365,763.81 2,627,252.76 1,261,488.9
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
29/31
7.3 Tenderer 4/10 IDAMAN IKHLAS SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
29
Item QtyQtyRate (RM)Rate (RM) Amount (RM)Amount (RM)
UnitUnitTotal Amount (RM)Total Amount (RM) DifferenDifferen
with QS (with QS (
QS Tenderer QS Tenderer QS Tenderer
Total B/F 1,365,763.81 2,627,252.76 1,261,488
Precastblock drain
1,344 120.00/m 511.00/m511.00/m 161,280.00 686,784.00 - - - 525,504
2100mm x2100mm
bricksump1 2,600.00/no 3,741.40/no3,741.40/no 2,600.00 3,741.40 - - - 1,141.4
1950mm x1950mm
ditto6 2,300.00/no 3,482.20/no3,482.20/no 13,800.00 20,893.20 - - - 7,093.2
1650mm x1650mm
ditto2 1,600.00/no 2,975.78/no2,975.78/no 3,200.00 5,951.56 - - - 2,751.5
1500mm x1500mm
ditto3 1,100/no 1,880.29/no1,880.29/no 3,300.00 5,640.87 - - - 2,340.8
Ditto exc1.5m but n.e
3.0m29 1,300.00/no 2,734.86/no2,734.86/no 37,700.00 79,310.94 - - - 41,610.
1200mm x1200mm
7 900.00/no 1,540.46/no1,540.46/no 6,300.00 10,783.74 - - - 4,483.2
750mm x750mm
cover slab47 75.00/no 230.43/no230.43/no 3,525,00 10,829.74 - - - 7,304.7
600mm x600mm ditto
170 48.00/no 211.33/no211.33/no 8.160.00 35,926.10 - - - 27,766.
450mm x450mm ditto
170 27.00/no 200.10/no200.10/no 4,590.00 34,017.00 - - - 29,427.
TOTAL 1,610,218.81 3,521,130.79 1,910,911
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
30/31
7.0 COMMENTS ON THE SUBMISSION (CONTD)
7.3 Tenderer 4/10 IDAMAN IKHLAS SDN. BHD. (CONTD)
The cost per m2 GFA GFA for typical unit (intermediate unit) is RM84.03 ishigher than the QS estimate which is RM67.95.
The rates/pricing for Infrastructure Works are higher, i.e. 56.17% higher thanthe QS estimate.
The rates/pricing for External Telephone Infra and Street Lighting Service10.97% higher than the Engineer estimate.
The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is lower, i.e -The pricing for Mechanical and Electrical works is lower, i.e -445.275.27% lower% lowerthan Engineer Estimate.than Engineer Estimate.
8.0 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
30
8/6/2019 71 Unit Report[1]
31/31
The following are our observation and recommendation:-
1) If time is and essence and the project need to be launched immediately,we recommend the following:-
a) Tender interview to be held to inform the tenderers about theirrates.
b) We proposed tenderer PA Builders to be inform about the ratesfor half slab and Acotec wall and they have to review their ratessince these items caused major difference from our estimate.
c) Tenderer Al-Ambia need to review the infrastructure works to ouracceptable range.
If both above tenderers price can be reduced to an acceptable range,their overall pricing would definitely be within an acceptable price for
award.
2) If time is not critical we recommend to re-tender this phase to get widerprice range because from our observation, the contractor pricing for theworks were not based on market price which we believe due of thefollowing reasons:-
a) The contractors speculate that the price of basic material wouldincrease again in the next 5 or 6 months which will coincide withwork being done on site.
b) Speculative buying of major item such as concrete andreinforcement bar. We strongly believe that the contractor hasmade forward order at a premium price in anticipation of the pricegoing higher whereas in actual fact the price is lower at thecurrent point of time.