Upload
santy-san
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 70_77_Lin
1/9
Print ISSN: 0355-3140 Electronic ISSN: 1795-990X Copyright (c) Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Downloaded from www.sjweh.fi on February 14, 2012
Original article
Scand J Work Environ Health 2012;38(1):70-77
doi:10.5271/sjweh.3194
Estimation of life expectancies and loss-of-life expectancies
for workers with permanent occupational disabilities of the
extremities a 21-year follow-up study
by Lin S-H, Lee H-Y, Chang Y-Y,Jang Y, Wang J-D
Affiliation: Department of Public Health, College of Medicine,
National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Department
of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung
University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan. [email protected]
Refers to the following texts of the Journal: 1982;8(3):153-158
2006;32(2):91-99 2002;28(5):328-332
Key terms: amputee; disability; life expectancy; loss-of-life
expectancy; lower extremity; occupation; occupational disability;
permanent disability; prevention; worker
This article in PubMed: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21912828
http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_issue.php?issue_id=291http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6540http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6541http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6542http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6543http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=233http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7249http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=778http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=3343http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=2243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=74http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7244http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7245http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=378http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=325http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21912828http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21912828http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=325http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=378http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7245http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7244http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=74http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=2243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=3343http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=778http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7249http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=233http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6543http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6542http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6541http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6540http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_issue.php?issue_id=2918/3/2019 70_77_Lin
2/9
70 Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1
Original articleScand J Work Environ Health 2012;38(1):7077. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3194
Estimation o lie expectancies and loss-o-lie expectancies or workers withpermanent occupational disabilities o the extremities a 21-year ollow-up
studyby Sheng-Hsuan Lin, MD,1 Hsin-Yi Lee, PhD,2Yu-Yin Chang, MSc,2Yuh Jang, PhD,3Jung-Der Wang,MD, ScD2, 4, 5
Lin S-H, Lee H-Y, Chang Y-Y, Jang Y, Wang J-D. Estimation of life expectancies and loss-of-life expectancies forworkers with permanent occupational disabilities of the extremities a 21-year follow-up study. Scand J WorkEnviron Health. 2012;38(1):7077. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3194
Objectives This study aims to estimate the life expectancies and loss-of-life expectancies of workers withpermanent occupational disabilities of the upper and lower limbs in Taiwan.
Methods We collected all cases of permanent occupational disability in the upper and lower limbs from theBureau of Labor Insurance database of compensation claims between 19862006; these data were linked with
the national mortality registry to obtain a survival function. Workers were divided into eight groups according
to their injury types, three of which fulfilled the condition of constant excess hazard and the survival functions
were extrapolated to 50 years using a semi-parametric method.
Results Of the subjects involved in the study, 1016 with toe amputations, 995 with foot or leg amputations, and4339 with foot or leg non-amputations showed a life expectancy of 1.8 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -1.3
-4.9], 4.9 (95% CI 2.2 -7.6), and 4.5 (95% CI 2.1 -6.9) years, respectively. The above method was validated
by extrapolating partial cohorts based on the first 10 years of follow-up data to 21-year and comparing actual
survival rates using the Kaplan Meier method. The relative bias of three groups was
8/3/2019 70_77_Lin
3/9
Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1 71
Lin et al
HIV (5) or cancer (6, 7). That method was also applied
in the estimation of life expectancy for workers with
permanent occupational disabilities from 19862000
and demonstrated that the expected loss-of-life expec-
tancy varied between 519 years, depending on the
grade of major physiological dysfunction and injury
type (8, 9). However, the above results cannot be
directly applied to workers with less severe, more
specific impairments such as amputation of the upper
and lower extremities. The aforementioned cohort was
followed up through 2006, providing an opportunity
to evaluate the long-term survival of these physically
challenged workers. The objective of this study was to
estimate the life expectancy and loss-of-life expectancy
of workers with permanent occupational disabilities of
the lower and upper extremities, including amputees
and non-amputees.
Methods
Study population
In Taiwan, the Bureau of Labor Insurance (BLI) has
administered a compensation scheme for workers
since 1950. A historical prospective study was carried
out based on the computerized registry established by
the BLI, which included all cases of permanent dis-
ability from 19862006 that resulted in compensation.
According to statements released by the BLI in Taiwan,the term approved compensation claim for permanent
occupational disability (ACCPOD) indicated that the
disabilities of affected workers were caused by occupa-
tional injuries or diseases and that they were unable to
recover within one year under medical care, regardless
of whether they were able to return to work (www.bli.
gov.tw/File.aspx?uid=NS%2B%2Fve99M9Q%3D ).
In total, the computerized registry consisted of 106
437 compensation claims for permanent occupa-
tional disability resulting from work-related injuries
and included details of workers gender, age on date
of injury, type of disability and accident, body partaffected, and monthly insured salary. Initially, 4745
cases were excluded due to incomplete information
on gender, age on date of injury, or body part affected.
Because the primary aim of this study was to determine
whether people with single injuries of the extremities
have reduced life expectancies, we only included sub-
jects with a single disability in our analysis. Thus, we
excluded 18 605 cases of individuals with more than
one type of disability. Among these excluded cases,
12 237 were compensated in one single application,
while the other 3049 subjects suffered from 6368 times
of recurrent injuries. We also excluded 11 907 cases
that involved injury locations other than the upper or
lower extremities. As summarized in figure 1, a total
of 71 001 cases remained for our analysis.
Among those individuals included in this study,
8017 suffered from injuries of the lower extremities and
62 984 suffered from injuries of the upper extremities.
We further stratified these cases into four categories of
injury: toes only, leg or foot, fingers, and hand or
arm. Each of these four categories was further divided
into amputee and non-amputee groups, which resulted in
a total of eight groups analyzed in this study. According
to the BLI, an amputation is defined as more than half
of a segment cut off; patients with all other kinds of dis-
ability that did not result in amputation were classified
as non-amputatees. The survival status of the individual
in each case was tracked through the end of December
2006 and was verified with the National Mortality
Registry (NMR) in Taiwan. The NMR, established in
1950, is maintained by the Department of Health of
the Executive Yuan (or institute). It is the most reliable
official database for certificates of death in Taiwan and
has been computerized since 1981 (10). In this study, we
linked the personal identification (ID) number of com-
pensated individuals from the BLI registry to the NMR
database. If a worker was found to have a record in the
mortality registry under the same ID number, then the
date and cause of death could be accurately confirmed.
If this verification was not possible, the individual was
considered to be either alive or to have had his or her
record censored sometime prior to 31 December 2006.
Because the annual emigration rate for Taiwan wasgenerally below 0.1% from 19862000, and most emi-
grants still pay their premiums and keep their insurance
under the National Health Insuranceprogram due to its
comprehensive coverage, the loss to follow-up among
censored subjects was very low after comprehensive
linkage with the data of NMR. Foreign workers were
not included in this study because they have not been
given ID numbers and hence their survival status could
not be verified.
Method o extrapolating survival unctions to lietime
After the aforementioned procedure, we obtained the
survival functions of eight different groups. As most
of these workers survived past the 21-year follow-up
period, we adopted a method of extrapolation to esti-
mate the mean and 95% confidence interval (95% CI)
of the lifetime survival for different types of disability.
The general method of extrapolation used in this study
was to assume that a disease can produce premature
mortality (or excess hazard), which can be quanti-
fied based on the follow-up of the patient cohort for a
shorter period of time (4, 11). If the excess mortality
in the study population appears to be a constant hazard
http://www.bli.gov.tw/File.aspx?uid=NS%2B%2Fve99M9Q%3Dhttp://www.bli.gov.tw/File.aspx?uid=NS%2B%2Fve99M9Q%3Dhttp://www.bli.gov.tw/File.aspx?uid=NS%2B%2Fve99M9Q%3Dhttp://www.bli.gov.tw/File.aspx?uid=NS%2B%2Fve99M9Q%3D8/3/2019 70_77_Lin
4/9
72 Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1
Loss-of-life expectancy for occupational extremity disability
compared with the age- and gender-matched reference
population during the first several years of follow-up,
we then use information from the reference population
for further extrapolation. We applied the Monte Carlo
method to generate the lifetime survival function for this
matched reference population by incorporating data (or
hazard functions) from national vital statistics. Finally,if the assumption of constant excess hazard holds,
then the logit-transformed survival ratio, indicated
by W(t), between the study and reference population
becomes linear during the later follow-up period, and
the estimated regression line can be used to extrapolate
lifelong survival beyond the follow-up period (5). We
have simulated (11) and mathematically proven(5) that
this is a valid method for predicting the life expectancy
under a high censored rate,which is also corroborated
by several real examples (5, 7, 9).
In order to verify whether the above method of
extrapolation can be appropriately applied to workerswith permanent occupational disabilities of the upper
and lower extremities, we first checked the temporal
trend of logit W(t) during the first 21 years in each
group. For each subject with a permanent disability,
100 age- and gender-matched referents were simulated
from the life tables of vital statistics of Taiwan using
the Monte Carlo method. If the hazard function for the
population with permanent disabilities of the upper and
lower extremities is proportional to that of the reference
population at each time t, then the logit transformation
of the ratio W(t) will become linear after the follow-up
period; the slope of that line can then be used to extrapo-
late long-term survival beyond the follow-up period.
This sampling and estimation procedure was repeated
100 times to obtain 100 projected estimates of survival
and 100 bootstrap standard errors.
Validation o the Monte Carlo extrapolation
The validation of the actual performance of the Monte
Carlo extrapolation for workers with permanent occu-
pational disabilities of the upper and lower extremities
was performed on a sub-cohort of the study popula-
tion that included workers with occupational injuries
occurring between 19861995. Assuming that those
patients were only followed until the end of 1995 (for
the first ten years), we extrapolated their survival data
through the end of 2006 using the Monte Carlo method.
Because this sub-cohort was actually followed until
the end of 2006, the actual observations at the end
of the 21-year follow-up period calculated with the
Kaplan-Meier method were considered the gold stan-
dard. In addition, we defined relative bias, which is
the indicator of the accuracy of our estimation, as the
value of difference between the actual observations
calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the
Monte Carlo simulation results, divided by the Kaplan-
Meier estimate.
We also defined health gap as the value of loss-of-
life expectancy of the cohort of interest divided by the
life expectancy of the age- and gender-matched general
population.
Results
Characteristics o subjects
As summarized in table 1, the studied population groups
were male-dominant; the proportions of male worker
ranged from 74.087.6%. The mean age for each group
ranged from 36.545.3 years old. The average of follow-
up time among eight groups ranged from 6.912 years.
The total follow-up person-years are summarized intable 1. The numbers of deceased individuals in the
final three subgroups that were able to be extrapolated
were 118, 391, and 175 for toe amputees, foot or leg
non-amputees, and foot or leg amputees, respectively.
The monthly insured salary for each group was between
NTD $22 96427 328 (equivalent to between USD
$706.60840.90). This salary was comparable to the
average monthly salary of the employed population
of Taiwan (NTD $27 404 or USD $ 843.20) (http://
www.bli.gov.tw). Three groups, consisting of finger
amputees, finger non-amputees, and hand or arm ampu-
tees, appeared to have lower adjusted average monthly
35 436 cases excluded due toincomplete data (N= 4924),multiple disabilities (N=18 605),or injury sites other than upperand lower extremities(N=11 907)
Total number of subjects in thedatabase (N=106 437)
Foot or leg non-amputee
(N=4339)
Subjects included in the analysis(N=71 001)
62 416 cases in which thesurvival couldnt be extrapolated
due to better survival(N= 17 522) or unstable excesshazard (N=44 894)
Toe(s)amputee(N=1016)
Foot or legamputee(N=995)
2235 cases in which the first tenyears cohort did not fit theconstant excess hazard
Figure 1. Flow chart o selection o subjects
http://www.bli.gov.tw/http://www.bli.gov.tw/http://www.bli.gov.tw/http://www.bli.gov.tw/8/3/2019 70_77_Lin
5/9
Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1 73
Lin et al
insurance salaries. Up to 70% or more of all disabilities
of the upper extremities were caused by individuals
becoming trapped or caught in machinery, except among
the hand or arm non-amputee subgroup (table 1). In
contrast, more than one-third of injuries in the foot or
leg amputee and non-amputee subgroups were the result
of transportation incidents.
Lie expectancy and loss-o-lie expectancy or three
subgroups
Data analysis revealed a violation of constant excess
hazard for the following five subgroups: (i) toe non-
amputee; (ii) finger amputee; (iii) finger non-amputee;
(iv) hand or arm amputee; and (v) hand or arm non-
amputee. We therefore performed Monte-Carlo extrapo-
lations only on the following three subgroups: toe ampu-
tee; foot or leg amputee; and foot or leg non-amputee.
The estimates of loss-of-life expectancy compared with
the general population among all groups varied between
1.84.9 years, while the health gaps ranged from 5.6
17.7%, as shown in table 2 and figure 2.
Validation o extrapolation
In order to examine the validity of the Monte-Carlo
method in the above three groups, we extrapolated the
cohorts established between 19861995 (10 years) for
an additional 11 years and then compared the results
with actual survival derived from Kaplan-Meyer estima-
tion of the 21 years of follow-up from 19862006 (table
2). The relative bias in the survival estimation for both
the toe amputee and foot or leg amputee groups was
8/3/2019 70_77_Lin
6/9
74 Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1
Loss-of-life expectancy for occupational extremity disability
Table 1b. Frequency distribution o subjects stratifed by demographic actors and non-amputee injury types. [NTD=New Taiwan Dollar]
Fingernon-amputees a
(N=43 690)
Hand or armnon-amputees b
(N=2235)
Toenon-amputees c
(N=1667)
Foot or legnon-amputees d
(N=4339)
Mean SD % Mean SD % Mean SD % Mean SD %
Proportion deceased 6.6 8.2 7.7 9.0
Male gender 76.4 74.0 86.2 78.1
Age at injury (years) 36.5 12.1 45 10.9 39.1 11.9 45.3 10.9
Calendar year o injury
19861990 28.0 16.0 21.8 14.519911995 26.5 7.5 25.1 5.819962000 21.8 13.9 23.8 16.420012006 23.6 62.6 29.3 63.3
Insured salary at injury
50 000 NTD e 0.8 0.0 1.7 0.1
Insured salary (NTD) e 23 301 8996 27 244 9361 26 155 9997 27 328 9582
Injury typeFallen to lower level 0.2 14.1 1.7 15.2
Slipped, tripped, or stumbled 0.3 13.6 0.9 11.4Struck by sliding object orknocked down
1.5 13.9 20.0 18.7
Trapped or caught in machinery 74.4 15.0 47.8 7.7
Cuts, lacerations, or punctures 21.5 4.5 13.9 3.1
Transportation incidents 0.7 32.5 10.1 38.3
Other 1.4 6.3 5.6 5.7
a Total ollow-up person-years=519 911b Total ollow-up person-years=16 092c Total ollow-up person-years=18 004d Total ollow-up person-years=29939e USD 1.00=NTD 32.5 in 2006
Table 2. Frequency distributions and estimates o lie expectancies and loss-o-lie expectancies or three cohorts in which the long-termsurvival could be extrapolated by Monte-Carlo simulation: rom 2150 years. [95% CI=95% confdence interval.]
Foot or leg amputees Toe amputees Foot or leg non-amputees
N Mean % 95% CI N Mean % 95% CI N Mean % 95% CI
Cases 995 1016 4339
Proportion deceased 17.6 11.6 9.0
Mean extrapolation by Monte Carlomethod rom 1021 (years)
17.6 16.818.4 18.6 16.121.1 16.7 11.621.8
Mean survival up to 21 years basedon actual observations calculated byKaplan-Meier method (years)
17.9 17.518.3 18.9 18.519.3 18.1 17.718.5
Relative bias a -1.7 1.6 7.7
Mean lietime survival based onMonte Carlo method (years) b
27.7 24.630.8 32.4 29.335.5 27.0 24.629.4
Mean loss o lie expectancy based onMonte Carlo method (years) b
4.9 2.27.6 1.8 1.34.9 4.5 2.16.9
Health gap 17.7 5.6 16.7
a Relative bias=(dierence between Kaplan-Meier observations and Monte Carlo simulation) / Kaplan-Meier observationsb Based on age- and gender-matched general population
8/3/2019 70_77_Lin
7/9
Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1 75
Lin et al
Figure 2. a, c, and e depict the logit transormation o the survival ratio W(t)between the survival unctions o three groups and those o theage- and gender-matched reerence population generated by the Monte Carlo method. The three groups consist o oot or leg non-amputees, ootor leg amputees, and toe amputees, o which the long-term survival is appropriate to extrapolate by Monte-Carlo simulation; b, d, and depict thepredicted 50-year survival curve or these three groups.
(a) W(t) for foot or leg amputee (b) 50-year survival for foot or leg amputee
(c) W(t) for foot or leg non-amputee (d) 50-year survival for foot or leg
non-amputee
(e) W(t) for toe amputee (f) 50-year survival for toe amputee
8/3/2019 70_77_Lin
8/9
76 Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1
Loss-of-life expectancy for occupational extremity disability
12). To our knowledge, this study is the first to estimate
the long-term survival of people with traumatic dis-
abilities of the upper and lower extremities by using
the semi-parametric extrapolation method. Our results
showed that the life expectancies of workers with toe
amputations, foot or leg amputations, and foot or leg
amputees were 32.4, 27.7, and 27.0 years, respectively,
while their average loss-of-life expectancy were 1.8, 4.9,
and 4.5 years, respectively (table 2). These results were
carefully validated by calculating the relative biases,
which were relatively small except for the estimate
of the foot or leg non-amputee subgroup. However,
because the 95% CI for the loss-of-life expectancy of
the toe amputee subgroup included 0 years, we should
not make any strong inferences based on those results.
The major reason why the people in these three
groups died prematurely was demonstrated in one of our
previous studies (13). This showed that workers with
permanent occupational disabilities of lower extremi-
ties tend to die from diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular
disease, liver cirrhosis, and chronic renal failure, with
increased standard mortality ratios (SMR) of 7.66,
2.40, 2.07, and 5.09, respectively. In addition, this
study also found that the survival function of workers
with disabilities of the upper extremities could not be
extrapolated using this method because of the violation
of the assumption of constant excess hazard. In fact,
these workers still suffered from increased mortalities
from suicide, transportation fatalities, and other injuries,
but their causes of deaths did not constitute a constant
mortality rate for their survival curve.This study has at least two major implications. First,
it quantified the amount of loss-of-life expectancy due
to occupational injury, which can be used in future cost-
effectiveness analyses aimed at helping prevent such
injuries. Although this study did not show the lifetime
medical cost for such injuries, we have demonstrated
that the prevention of a case of foot or leg amputation
can save about 4.9 life-years, while preventing a foot
or leg injury that does not result in amputation can save
about 4.5 life-years. Second, while most countries current
system of workers compensation provides some form of
income supplementation for injured workers, none haveincorporated compensation for the reduction in workers
life expectancy. Based on the theory of justice to preserve
ones own capabilities and possibly to compensate others
for the loss-of-life expectancy (14, 15), we recommend
that future improvements to compensations systems take
reduction in life expectancy into account.
Study limitations
Although we have used the most comprehensive national
data currently available in Taiwan, this study has some
limitations. First, life expectancy is also a function of
comorbidity. Besides age, gender, and the occurrence of
occupational disability of the upper or lower extremities,
there are many other risk factors, including underlying
chronic diseases, lifestyle, and socioeconomic status,
that determine peoples life expectancy. As subjects
included in this study were young or middle-aged work-
ers with an average age ranging between 36.545.3
years (table 1), the extent to which comorbidity of
chronic diseases confounds our results might not be
very large.
Second, all subjects were actively employed; they
were healthy workers who would have had better base-
line health conditions and reduced mortality compared to
the general population had the work-related injuries not
occurred (16, 17). Thus, our study mildly underestimated
the reduction in life expectancy associated with disability.
Moreover, the lifetime extrapolation is based on the life
tables established by current and previous vital statistics.
Because health technology continues to improve, such
a method could easily underestimate the actual survival
of workers in the future, including those with permanent
occupational disabilities of the lower extremities. Thus,
our estimations of life expectancy and loss-of-life expec-
tancy for these workers are conservative and must be
constantly adjusted to reflect the most current data.
Concluding remarks
Workers who sustained occupational injuries and pos-
sessed permanent disabilities of the foot or leg were
found to have a loss-of-life expectancy of 4.9 yearswhen their injuries resulted in amputation and 4.5 years
when they did not. We have also demonstrated that the
semi-parametric extrapolation method is feasible and
accurate for predicting life expectancy and expected
years-of-life-lost for cohorts with permanent occupa-
tional disabilities. In the interest of fairness, we rec-
ommend that such losses be taken into consideration
in workers compensation systems. In addition, these
results can be used to assess the cost-effectiveness of
preventive occupational health services.
Acknowledgements
This study is supported partially by a grant from the
Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH)
of the Council of Labor Affairs, Executive Yuan of
Taiwan (No. IOSH97-M101) and another grant from
the National Science Council (NSC 96-2628-B-002-
071-MY3).
We are indebted to the Bureau of Labor Insurance
of Taiwan for kindly providing the database of workers
compensation during 19862006.
8/3/2019 70_77_Lin
9/9
Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1 77
Lin et al
References
1. Aulivola B, Hile CN, Hamdan AD, et al. Major lower extremity
amputation: outcome of a modern series. Arch Surg 2004; 139:
3959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.4.395.
2. Heikkinen M, Saarinen J, Suominen VP, et al. Lower limb
amputations: differences between the genders and long-termsurvival. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31:27786. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1080/03093640601040244.
3. Sandnes DK, Sobel M, Flum DR. Survival after lower-
extremity amputation. J Am Coll Surg 2004;199:394402.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.270.
4. Hwang JS, Wang JD. Monte Carlo estimation of extrapolation
of quality-adjusted survival for follow-up studies. Stat Med
1999;18:162740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0258(19990715)18:133.0.CO;2-D.
5. Fang CT, Chang YY, Hsu HM, et al. Life expectancy of
patients with newly-diagnosed HIV infection in the era of
highly active antiretroviral therapy. Qjm 2007;100:97105.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcl141.
6. Chu PC, Hwang JS, Wang JD, et al. Estimation of the financial
burden to the National Health Insurance for patients with major
cancers in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 2008;107:5463.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60008-X.
7. Chu PC, Wang JD, Hwang JS, et al. Estimation of Life
Expectancy and the Expected Years of Life Lost in Patients
with Major Cancers: Extrapolation of Survival Curves under
High-Censored Rates. Value Health 2008;11:11029. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.x .
8. Ho JJ, Hwang JS, Wang JD. Estimation of reduced lifeexpectancy from serious occupational injuries in Taiwan.
Accid Anal Prev 2006;38:9618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
aap.2006.03.007.
9. Ho JJ, Hwang JS, Wang JD. Life-expectancy estimations and
the determinants of survival after 15 years of follow-up for 81
249 workers with permanent occupational disabilities. Scand
J Work Environ Health 2006;32:918.
10. Hsieh GY, Chen PC, Wang JD. Verification and correction of
error for death registration data of the Department of Health
R.O.C. between 1980 and 1997. Taiwan J Public Health 2002;
21:32938.
11. Hwang JS, Tsauo JY, Wang JD. Estimation of expected
quality adjusted survival by cross-sectional survey. Stat Med1996;15:93102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0258(19960115)15:13.0.CO;2-2.
12. Mac Neill HL, Devlin M, Pauley T, et al. Long-term outcomes
and survival of patients with bilateral transtibial amputations
after rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 87: 18996.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cc.
13. Lin SH, Lee HY, Chang YY, et al. Increased mortality risk
for workers with a compensated, permanent occupational
disability of the upper or lower extremities: a 21-year follow-
up study. Am J Epidemiol 2010;171:91723. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1093/aje/kwq003.
14. Sen A. Freedom and the foundations of justice. In: Sen A, eds.
Development as freedom. 1st ed. New York, NY: Knopf 1999:
5486.
15. Rawls J. The main idea of the theory of justice. In: Rawls J, A
Theory of Justice. 1st ed. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of
Harvard University Press 1971:117.
16. Radon K, Goldberg M, Becklake M. Healthy worker effect in
cohort studies on chronic bronchitis. Scand J Work Environ
Health 2002;28:32832.
17. Wang JD, Miettinen OS. Occupational mortality studies.
Principles of validity. Scand J Work Environ Health 1982;8:
1538.
Received for publication: 24 September 2010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.4.395http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.4.395http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640601040244http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640601040244http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640601040244http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.270http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.270http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13%3c1627::AID-SIM159%3e3.0.CO;2-Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13%3c1627::AID-SIM159%3e3.0.CO;2-Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13%3c1627::AID-SIM159%3e3.0.CO;2-Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcl141http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcl141http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60008-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60008-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cchttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cchttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cchttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cchttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cchttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60008-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcl141http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13%3c1627::AID-SIM159%3e3.0.CO;2-Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13%3c1627::AID-SIM159%3e3.0.CO;2-Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.270http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640601040244http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640601040244http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.4.395