70_77_Lin

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 70_77_Lin

    1/9

    Print ISSN: 0355-3140 Electronic ISSN: 1795-990X Copyright (c) Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health

    Downloaded from www.sjweh.fi on February 14, 2012

    Original article

    Scand J Work Environ Health 2012;38(1):70-77

    doi:10.5271/sjweh.3194

    Estimation of life expectancies and loss-of-life expectancies

    for workers with permanent occupational disabilities of the

    extremities a 21-year follow-up study

    by Lin S-H, Lee H-Y, Chang Y-Y,Jang Y, Wang J-D

    Affiliation: Department of Public Health, College of Medicine,

    National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Department

    of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung

    University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan. [email protected]

    Refers to the following texts of the Journal: 1982;8(3):153-158

    2006;32(2):91-99 2002;28(5):328-332

    Key terms: amputee; disability; life expectancy; loss-of-life

    expectancy; lower extremity; occupation; occupational disability;

    permanent disability; prevention; worker

    This article in PubMed: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21912828

    http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_issue.php?issue_id=291http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6540http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6541http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6542http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6543http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=233http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7249http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=778http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=3343http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=2243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=74http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7244http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7245http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=378http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=325http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21912828http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21912828http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=325http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=378http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7245http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7244http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=74http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=2243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7243http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=3343http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=778http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?keyword_id=7249http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=233http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6543http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6542http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6541http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?author_id=6540http://d/www/www.sjweh.fi/show_issue.php?issue_id=291
  • 8/3/2019 70_77_Lin

    2/9

    70 Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1

    Original articleScand J Work Environ Health 2012;38(1):7077. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3194

    Estimation o lie expectancies and loss-o-lie expectancies or workers withpermanent occupational disabilities o the extremities a 21-year ollow-up

    studyby Sheng-Hsuan Lin, MD,1 Hsin-Yi Lee, PhD,2Yu-Yin Chang, MSc,2Yuh Jang, PhD,3Jung-Der Wang,MD, ScD2, 4, 5

    Lin S-H, Lee H-Y, Chang Y-Y, Jang Y, Wang J-D. Estimation of life expectancies and loss-of-life expectancies forworkers with permanent occupational disabilities of the extremities a 21-year follow-up study. Scand J WorkEnviron Health. 2012;38(1):7077. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3194

    Objectives This study aims to estimate the life expectancies and loss-of-life expectancies of workers withpermanent occupational disabilities of the upper and lower limbs in Taiwan.

    Methods We collected all cases of permanent occupational disability in the upper and lower limbs from theBureau of Labor Insurance database of compensation claims between 19862006; these data were linked with

    the national mortality registry to obtain a survival function. Workers were divided into eight groups according

    to their injury types, three of which fulfilled the condition of constant excess hazard and the survival functions

    were extrapolated to 50 years using a semi-parametric method.

    Results Of the subjects involved in the study, 1016 with toe amputations, 995 with foot or leg amputations, and4339 with foot or leg non-amputations showed a life expectancy of 1.8 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -1.3

    -4.9], 4.9 (95% CI 2.2 -7.6), and 4.5 (95% CI 2.1 -6.9) years, respectively. The above method was validated

    by extrapolating partial cohorts based on the first 10 years of follow-up data to 21-year and comparing actual

    survival rates using the Kaplan Meier method. The relative bias of three groups was

  • 8/3/2019 70_77_Lin

    3/9

    Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1 71

    Lin et al

    HIV (5) or cancer (6, 7). That method was also applied

    in the estimation of life expectancy for workers with

    permanent occupational disabilities from 19862000

    and demonstrated that the expected loss-of-life expec-

    tancy varied between 519 years, depending on the

    grade of major physiological dysfunction and injury

    type (8, 9). However, the above results cannot be

    directly applied to workers with less severe, more

    specific impairments such as amputation of the upper

    and lower extremities. The aforementioned cohort was

    followed up through 2006, providing an opportunity

    to evaluate the long-term survival of these physically

    challenged workers. The objective of this study was to

    estimate the life expectancy and loss-of-life expectancy

    of workers with permanent occupational disabilities of

    the lower and upper extremities, including amputees

    and non-amputees.

    Methods

    Study population

    In Taiwan, the Bureau of Labor Insurance (BLI) has

    administered a compensation scheme for workers

    since 1950. A historical prospective study was carried

    out based on the computerized registry established by

    the BLI, which included all cases of permanent dis-

    ability from 19862006 that resulted in compensation.

    According to statements released by the BLI in Taiwan,the term approved compensation claim for permanent

    occupational disability (ACCPOD) indicated that the

    disabilities of affected workers were caused by occupa-

    tional injuries or diseases and that they were unable to

    recover within one year under medical care, regardless

    of whether they were able to return to work (www.bli.

    gov.tw/File.aspx?uid=NS%2B%2Fve99M9Q%3D ).

    In total, the computerized registry consisted of 106

    437 compensation claims for permanent occupa-

    tional disability resulting from work-related injuries

    and included details of workers gender, age on date

    of injury, type of disability and accident, body partaffected, and monthly insured salary. Initially, 4745

    cases were excluded due to incomplete information

    on gender, age on date of injury, or body part affected.

    Because the primary aim of this study was to determine

    whether people with single injuries of the extremities

    have reduced life expectancies, we only included sub-

    jects with a single disability in our analysis. Thus, we

    excluded 18 605 cases of individuals with more than

    one type of disability. Among these excluded cases,

    12 237 were compensated in one single application,

    while the other 3049 subjects suffered from 6368 times

    of recurrent injuries. We also excluded 11 907 cases

    that involved injury locations other than the upper or

    lower extremities. As summarized in figure 1, a total

    of 71 001 cases remained for our analysis.

    Among those individuals included in this study,

    8017 suffered from injuries of the lower extremities and

    62 984 suffered from injuries of the upper extremities.

    We further stratified these cases into four categories of

    injury: toes only, leg or foot, fingers, and hand or

    arm. Each of these four categories was further divided

    into amputee and non-amputee groups, which resulted in

    a total of eight groups analyzed in this study. According

    to the BLI, an amputation is defined as more than half

    of a segment cut off; patients with all other kinds of dis-

    ability that did not result in amputation were classified

    as non-amputatees. The survival status of the individual

    in each case was tracked through the end of December

    2006 and was verified with the National Mortality

    Registry (NMR) in Taiwan. The NMR, established in

    1950, is maintained by the Department of Health of

    the Executive Yuan (or institute). It is the most reliable

    official database for certificates of death in Taiwan and

    has been computerized since 1981 (10). In this study, we

    linked the personal identification (ID) number of com-

    pensated individuals from the BLI registry to the NMR

    database. If a worker was found to have a record in the

    mortality registry under the same ID number, then the

    date and cause of death could be accurately confirmed.

    If this verification was not possible, the individual was

    considered to be either alive or to have had his or her

    record censored sometime prior to 31 December 2006.

    Because the annual emigration rate for Taiwan wasgenerally below 0.1% from 19862000, and most emi-

    grants still pay their premiums and keep their insurance

    under the National Health Insuranceprogram due to its

    comprehensive coverage, the loss to follow-up among

    censored subjects was very low after comprehensive

    linkage with the data of NMR. Foreign workers were

    not included in this study because they have not been

    given ID numbers and hence their survival status could

    not be verified.

    Method o extrapolating survival unctions to lietime

    After the aforementioned procedure, we obtained the

    survival functions of eight different groups. As most

    of these workers survived past the 21-year follow-up

    period, we adopted a method of extrapolation to esti-

    mate the mean and 95% confidence interval (95% CI)

    of the lifetime survival for different types of disability.

    The general method of extrapolation used in this study

    was to assume that a disease can produce premature

    mortality (or excess hazard), which can be quanti-

    fied based on the follow-up of the patient cohort for a

    shorter period of time (4, 11). If the excess mortality

    in the study population appears to be a constant hazard

    http://www.bli.gov.tw/File.aspx?uid=NS%2B%2Fve99M9Q%3Dhttp://www.bli.gov.tw/File.aspx?uid=NS%2B%2Fve99M9Q%3Dhttp://www.bli.gov.tw/File.aspx?uid=NS%2B%2Fve99M9Q%3Dhttp://www.bli.gov.tw/File.aspx?uid=NS%2B%2Fve99M9Q%3D
  • 8/3/2019 70_77_Lin

    4/9

    72 Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1

    Loss-of-life expectancy for occupational extremity disability

    compared with the age- and gender-matched reference

    population during the first several years of follow-up,

    we then use information from the reference population

    for further extrapolation. We applied the Monte Carlo

    method to generate the lifetime survival function for this

    matched reference population by incorporating data (or

    hazard functions) from national vital statistics. Finally,if the assumption of constant excess hazard holds,

    then the logit-transformed survival ratio, indicated

    by W(t), between the study and reference population

    becomes linear during the later follow-up period, and

    the estimated regression line can be used to extrapolate

    lifelong survival beyond the follow-up period (5). We

    have simulated (11) and mathematically proven(5) that

    this is a valid method for predicting the life expectancy

    under a high censored rate,which is also corroborated

    by several real examples (5, 7, 9).

    In order to verify whether the above method of

    extrapolation can be appropriately applied to workerswith permanent occupational disabilities of the upper

    and lower extremities, we first checked the temporal

    trend of logit W(t) during the first 21 years in each

    group. For each subject with a permanent disability,

    100 age- and gender-matched referents were simulated

    from the life tables of vital statistics of Taiwan using

    the Monte Carlo method. If the hazard function for the

    population with permanent disabilities of the upper and

    lower extremities is proportional to that of the reference

    population at each time t, then the logit transformation

    of the ratio W(t) will become linear after the follow-up

    period; the slope of that line can then be used to extrapo-

    late long-term survival beyond the follow-up period.

    This sampling and estimation procedure was repeated

    100 times to obtain 100 projected estimates of survival

    and 100 bootstrap standard errors.

    Validation o the Monte Carlo extrapolation

    The validation of the actual performance of the Monte

    Carlo extrapolation for workers with permanent occu-

    pational disabilities of the upper and lower extremities

    was performed on a sub-cohort of the study popula-

    tion that included workers with occupational injuries

    occurring between 19861995. Assuming that those

    patients were only followed until the end of 1995 (for

    the first ten years), we extrapolated their survival data

    through the end of 2006 using the Monte Carlo method.

    Because this sub-cohort was actually followed until

    the end of 2006, the actual observations at the end

    of the 21-year follow-up period calculated with the

    Kaplan-Meier method were considered the gold stan-

    dard. In addition, we defined relative bias, which is

    the indicator of the accuracy of our estimation, as the

    value of difference between the actual observations

    calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the

    Monte Carlo simulation results, divided by the Kaplan-

    Meier estimate.

    We also defined health gap as the value of loss-of-

    life expectancy of the cohort of interest divided by the

    life expectancy of the age- and gender-matched general

    population.

    Results

    Characteristics o subjects

    As summarized in table 1, the studied population groups

    were male-dominant; the proportions of male worker

    ranged from 74.087.6%. The mean age for each group

    ranged from 36.545.3 years old. The average of follow-

    up time among eight groups ranged from 6.912 years.

    The total follow-up person-years are summarized intable 1. The numbers of deceased individuals in the

    final three subgroups that were able to be extrapolated

    were 118, 391, and 175 for toe amputees, foot or leg

    non-amputees, and foot or leg amputees, respectively.

    The monthly insured salary for each group was between

    NTD $22 96427 328 (equivalent to between USD

    $706.60840.90). This salary was comparable to the

    average monthly salary of the employed population

    of Taiwan (NTD $27 404 or USD $ 843.20) (http://

    www.bli.gov.tw). Three groups, consisting of finger

    amputees, finger non-amputees, and hand or arm ampu-

    tees, appeared to have lower adjusted average monthly

    35 436 cases excluded due toincomplete data (N= 4924),multiple disabilities (N=18 605),or injury sites other than upperand lower extremities(N=11 907)

    Total number of subjects in thedatabase (N=106 437)

    Foot or leg non-amputee

    (N=4339)

    Subjects included in the analysis(N=71 001)

    62 416 cases in which thesurvival couldnt be extrapolated

    due to better survival(N= 17 522) or unstable excesshazard (N=44 894)

    Toe(s)amputee(N=1016)

    Foot or legamputee(N=995)

    2235 cases in which the first tenyears cohort did not fit theconstant excess hazard

    Figure 1. Flow chart o selection o subjects

    http://www.bli.gov.tw/http://www.bli.gov.tw/http://www.bli.gov.tw/http://www.bli.gov.tw/
  • 8/3/2019 70_77_Lin

    5/9

    Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1 73

    Lin et al

    insurance salaries. Up to 70% or more of all disabilities

    of the upper extremities were caused by individuals

    becoming trapped or caught in machinery, except among

    the hand or arm non-amputee subgroup (table 1). In

    contrast, more than one-third of injuries in the foot or

    leg amputee and non-amputee subgroups were the result

    of transportation incidents.

    Lie expectancy and loss-o-lie expectancy or three

    subgroups

    Data analysis revealed a violation of constant excess

    hazard for the following five subgroups: (i) toe non-

    amputee; (ii) finger amputee; (iii) finger non-amputee;

    (iv) hand or arm amputee; and (v) hand or arm non-

    amputee. We therefore performed Monte-Carlo extrapo-

    lations only on the following three subgroups: toe ampu-

    tee; foot or leg amputee; and foot or leg non-amputee.

    The estimates of loss-of-life expectancy compared with

    the general population among all groups varied between

    1.84.9 years, while the health gaps ranged from 5.6

    17.7%, as shown in table 2 and figure 2.

    Validation o extrapolation

    In order to examine the validity of the Monte-Carlo

    method in the above three groups, we extrapolated the

    cohorts established between 19861995 (10 years) for

    an additional 11 years and then compared the results

    with actual survival derived from Kaplan-Meyer estima-

    tion of the 21 years of follow-up from 19862006 (table

    2). The relative bias in the survival estimation for both

    the toe amputee and foot or leg amputee groups was

  • 8/3/2019 70_77_Lin

    6/9

    74 Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1

    Loss-of-life expectancy for occupational extremity disability

    Table 1b. Frequency distribution o subjects stratifed by demographic actors and non-amputee injury types. [NTD=New Taiwan Dollar]

    Fingernon-amputees a

    (N=43 690)

    Hand or armnon-amputees b

    (N=2235)

    Toenon-amputees c

    (N=1667)

    Foot or legnon-amputees d

    (N=4339)

    Mean SD % Mean SD % Mean SD % Mean SD %

    Proportion deceased 6.6 8.2 7.7 9.0

    Male gender 76.4 74.0 86.2 78.1

    Age at injury (years) 36.5 12.1 45 10.9 39.1 11.9 45.3 10.9

    Calendar year o injury

    19861990 28.0 16.0 21.8 14.519911995 26.5 7.5 25.1 5.819962000 21.8 13.9 23.8 16.420012006 23.6 62.6 29.3 63.3

    Insured salary at injury

    50 000 NTD e 0.8 0.0 1.7 0.1

    Insured salary (NTD) e 23 301 8996 27 244 9361 26 155 9997 27 328 9582

    Injury typeFallen to lower level 0.2 14.1 1.7 15.2

    Slipped, tripped, or stumbled 0.3 13.6 0.9 11.4Struck by sliding object orknocked down

    1.5 13.9 20.0 18.7

    Trapped or caught in machinery 74.4 15.0 47.8 7.7

    Cuts, lacerations, or punctures 21.5 4.5 13.9 3.1

    Transportation incidents 0.7 32.5 10.1 38.3

    Other 1.4 6.3 5.6 5.7

    a Total ollow-up person-years=519 911b Total ollow-up person-years=16 092c Total ollow-up person-years=18 004d Total ollow-up person-years=29939e USD 1.00=NTD 32.5 in 2006

    Table 2. Frequency distributions and estimates o lie expectancies and loss-o-lie expectancies or three cohorts in which the long-termsurvival could be extrapolated by Monte-Carlo simulation: rom 2150 years. [95% CI=95% confdence interval.]

    Foot or leg amputees Toe amputees Foot or leg non-amputees

    N Mean % 95% CI N Mean % 95% CI N Mean % 95% CI

    Cases 995 1016 4339

    Proportion deceased 17.6 11.6 9.0

    Mean extrapolation by Monte Carlomethod rom 1021 (years)

    17.6 16.818.4 18.6 16.121.1 16.7 11.621.8

    Mean survival up to 21 years basedon actual observations calculated byKaplan-Meier method (years)

    17.9 17.518.3 18.9 18.519.3 18.1 17.718.5

    Relative bias a -1.7 1.6 7.7

    Mean lietime survival based onMonte Carlo method (years) b

    27.7 24.630.8 32.4 29.335.5 27.0 24.629.4

    Mean loss o lie expectancy based onMonte Carlo method (years) b

    4.9 2.27.6 1.8 1.34.9 4.5 2.16.9

    Health gap 17.7 5.6 16.7

    a Relative bias=(dierence between Kaplan-Meier observations and Monte Carlo simulation) / Kaplan-Meier observationsb Based on age- and gender-matched general population

  • 8/3/2019 70_77_Lin

    7/9

    Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1 75

    Lin et al

    Figure 2. a, c, and e depict the logit transormation o the survival ratio W(t)between the survival unctions o three groups and those o theage- and gender-matched reerence population generated by the Monte Carlo method. The three groups consist o oot or leg non-amputees, ootor leg amputees, and toe amputees, o which the long-term survival is appropriate to extrapolate by Monte-Carlo simulation; b, d, and depict thepredicted 50-year survival curve or these three groups.

    (a) W(t) for foot or leg amputee (b) 50-year survival for foot or leg amputee

    (c) W(t) for foot or leg non-amputee (d) 50-year survival for foot or leg

    non-amputee

    (e) W(t) for toe amputee (f) 50-year survival for toe amputee

  • 8/3/2019 70_77_Lin

    8/9

    76 Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1

    Loss-of-life expectancy for occupational extremity disability

    12). To our knowledge, this study is the first to estimate

    the long-term survival of people with traumatic dis-

    abilities of the upper and lower extremities by using

    the semi-parametric extrapolation method. Our results

    showed that the life expectancies of workers with toe

    amputations, foot or leg amputations, and foot or leg

    amputees were 32.4, 27.7, and 27.0 years, respectively,

    while their average loss-of-life expectancy were 1.8, 4.9,

    and 4.5 years, respectively (table 2). These results were

    carefully validated by calculating the relative biases,

    which were relatively small except for the estimate

    of the foot or leg non-amputee subgroup. However,

    because the 95% CI for the loss-of-life expectancy of

    the toe amputee subgroup included 0 years, we should

    not make any strong inferences based on those results.

    The major reason why the people in these three

    groups died prematurely was demonstrated in one of our

    previous studies (13). This showed that workers with

    permanent occupational disabilities of lower extremi-

    ties tend to die from diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular

    disease, liver cirrhosis, and chronic renal failure, with

    increased standard mortality ratios (SMR) of 7.66,

    2.40, 2.07, and 5.09, respectively. In addition, this

    study also found that the survival function of workers

    with disabilities of the upper extremities could not be

    extrapolated using this method because of the violation

    of the assumption of constant excess hazard. In fact,

    these workers still suffered from increased mortalities

    from suicide, transportation fatalities, and other injuries,

    but their causes of deaths did not constitute a constant

    mortality rate for their survival curve.This study has at least two major implications. First,

    it quantified the amount of loss-of-life expectancy due

    to occupational injury, which can be used in future cost-

    effectiveness analyses aimed at helping prevent such

    injuries. Although this study did not show the lifetime

    medical cost for such injuries, we have demonstrated

    that the prevention of a case of foot or leg amputation

    can save about 4.9 life-years, while preventing a foot

    or leg injury that does not result in amputation can save

    about 4.5 life-years. Second, while most countries current

    system of workers compensation provides some form of

    income supplementation for injured workers, none haveincorporated compensation for the reduction in workers

    life expectancy. Based on the theory of justice to preserve

    ones own capabilities and possibly to compensate others

    for the loss-of-life expectancy (14, 15), we recommend

    that future improvements to compensations systems take

    reduction in life expectancy into account.

    Study limitations

    Although we have used the most comprehensive national

    data currently available in Taiwan, this study has some

    limitations. First, life expectancy is also a function of

    comorbidity. Besides age, gender, and the occurrence of

    occupational disability of the upper or lower extremities,

    there are many other risk factors, including underlying

    chronic diseases, lifestyle, and socioeconomic status,

    that determine peoples life expectancy. As subjects

    included in this study were young or middle-aged work-

    ers with an average age ranging between 36.545.3

    years (table 1), the extent to which comorbidity of

    chronic diseases confounds our results might not be

    very large.

    Second, all subjects were actively employed; they

    were healthy workers who would have had better base-

    line health conditions and reduced mortality compared to

    the general population had the work-related injuries not

    occurred (16, 17). Thus, our study mildly underestimated

    the reduction in life expectancy associated with disability.

    Moreover, the lifetime extrapolation is based on the life

    tables established by current and previous vital statistics.

    Because health technology continues to improve, such

    a method could easily underestimate the actual survival

    of workers in the future, including those with permanent

    occupational disabilities of the lower extremities. Thus,

    our estimations of life expectancy and loss-of-life expec-

    tancy for these workers are conservative and must be

    constantly adjusted to reflect the most current data.

    Concluding remarks

    Workers who sustained occupational injuries and pos-

    sessed permanent disabilities of the foot or leg were

    found to have a loss-of-life expectancy of 4.9 yearswhen their injuries resulted in amputation and 4.5 years

    when they did not. We have also demonstrated that the

    semi-parametric extrapolation method is feasible and

    accurate for predicting life expectancy and expected

    years-of-life-lost for cohorts with permanent occupa-

    tional disabilities. In the interest of fairness, we rec-

    ommend that such losses be taken into consideration

    in workers compensation systems. In addition, these

    results can be used to assess the cost-effectiveness of

    preventive occupational health services.

    Acknowledgements

    This study is supported partially by a grant from the

    Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH)

    of the Council of Labor Affairs, Executive Yuan of

    Taiwan (No. IOSH97-M101) and another grant from

    the National Science Council (NSC 96-2628-B-002-

    071-MY3).

    We are indebted to the Bureau of Labor Insurance

    of Taiwan for kindly providing the database of workers

    compensation during 19862006.

  • 8/3/2019 70_77_Lin

    9/9

    Scand J Work Environ Health 2012, vol 38, no 1 77

    Lin et al

    References

    1. Aulivola B, Hile CN, Hamdan AD, et al. Major lower extremity

    amputation: outcome of a modern series. Arch Surg 2004; 139:

    3959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.4.395.

    2. Heikkinen M, Saarinen J, Suominen VP, et al. Lower limb

    amputations: differences between the genders and long-termsurvival. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31:27786. http://dx.doi.

    org/10.1080/03093640601040244.

    3. Sandnes DK, Sobel M, Flum DR. Survival after lower-

    extremity amputation. J Am Coll Surg 2004;199:394402.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.270.

    4. Hwang JS, Wang JD. Monte Carlo estimation of extrapolation

    of quality-adjusted survival for follow-up studies. Stat Med

    1999;18:162740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-

    0258(19990715)18:133.0.CO;2-D.

    5. Fang CT, Chang YY, Hsu HM, et al. Life expectancy of

    patients with newly-diagnosed HIV infection in the era of

    highly active antiretroviral therapy. Qjm 2007;100:97105.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcl141.

    6. Chu PC, Hwang JS, Wang JD, et al. Estimation of the financial

    burden to the National Health Insurance for patients with major

    cancers in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 2008;107:5463.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60008-X.

    7. Chu PC, Wang JD, Hwang JS, et al. Estimation of Life

    Expectancy and the Expected Years of Life Lost in Patients

    with Major Cancers: Extrapolation of Survival Curves under

    High-Censored Rates. Value Health 2008;11:11029. http://

    dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.x .

    8. Ho JJ, Hwang JS, Wang JD. Estimation of reduced lifeexpectancy from serious occupational injuries in Taiwan.

    Accid Anal Prev 2006;38:9618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.

    aap.2006.03.007.

    9. Ho JJ, Hwang JS, Wang JD. Life-expectancy estimations and

    the determinants of survival after 15 years of follow-up for 81

    249 workers with permanent occupational disabilities. Scand

    J Work Environ Health 2006;32:918.

    10. Hsieh GY, Chen PC, Wang JD. Verification and correction of

    error for death registration data of the Department of Health

    R.O.C. between 1980 and 1997. Taiwan J Public Health 2002;

    21:32938.

    11. Hwang JS, Tsauo JY, Wang JD. Estimation of expected

    quality adjusted survival by cross-sectional survey. Stat Med1996;15:93102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-

    0258(19960115)15:13.0.CO;2-2.

    12. Mac Neill HL, Devlin M, Pauley T, et al. Long-term outcomes

    and survival of patients with bilateral transtibial amputations

    after rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 87: 18996.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cc.

    13. Lin SH, Lee HY, Chang YY, et al. Increased mortality risk

    for workers with a compensated, permanent occupational

    disability of the upper or lower extremities: a 21-year follow-

    up study. Am J Epidemiol 2010;171:91723. http://dx.doi.

    org/10.1093/aje/kwq003.

    14. Sen A. Freedom and the foundations of justice. In: Sen A, eds.

    Development as freedom. 1st ed. New York, NY: Knopf 1999:

    5486.

    15. Rawls J. The main idea of the theory of justice. In: Rawls J, A

    Theory of Justice. 1st ed. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of

    Harvard University Press 1971:117.

    16. Radon K, Goldberg M, Becklake M. Healthy worker effect in

    cohort studies on chronic bronchitis. Scand J Work Environ

    Health 2002;28:32832.

    17. Wang JD, Miettinen OS. Occupational mortality studies.

    Principles of validity. Scand J Work Environ Health 1982;8:

    1538.

    Received for publication: 24 September 2010

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.4.395http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.4.395http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640601040244http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640601040244http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640601040244http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.270http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.270http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13%3c1627::AID-SIM159%3e3.0.CO;2-Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13%3c1627::AID-SIM159%3e3.0.CO;2-Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13%3c1627::AID-SIM159%3e3.0.CO;2-Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcl141http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcl141http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60008-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60008-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cchttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cchttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cchttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=2480http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=682http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq003http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cchttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31816178cchttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1%3c93::AID-SIM155%3e3.0.CO;2-2http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=984http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00350.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60008-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcl141http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13%3c1627::AID-SIM159%3e3.0.CO;2-Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13%3c1627::AID-SIM159%3e3.0.CO;2-Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.270http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640601040244http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640601040244http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.4.395