Upload
eric-ortiz
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
April 10, 2023
Mentoring: key factor for teacher development in
Iranian EFL setting
Khalil MotallebzadehIslamic Azad University (IAU), Iran
45th Annual International IATEFL Conference and Exhibition
15th -19th April 2011, Brighton, UK
April 10, 2023
Outline My personal story Focus of the study Mentoring and more Study method Results Conclusions
My story as a novice EFL teacher
What about your stories?
April 10, 2023
Focus of the Study
Mentoring as a professional development strategy has not been paid much attention in Iranian EFL context.
Research Questions: What are the effects of mentoring/induction
support program on beginning English teachers?
What are the effects of mentoring/induction support on beginning English teachers’ retention in the profession?
April 10, 2023
Mentoring & more
Origin of the term Mentor Homer’s epic poem, The Odyssey Original Mentor:
the goddess Athena and man caring and guiding Telemachus helping Telemachus to grow and learn,
throughout the Odyssey a transitional aide to manhood
April 10, 2023
What is mentoring?
Mentoring is a process in which a more skilled or more experienced person, the mentor, nurtures someone less skilled or experienced, the mentee, (Johnson, 2002).
Mentoring is a relational experience in which one person empowers another by sharing resources (Stanley & Clinton, 1992).
April 10, 2023
Most first-year teachers often lose their enthusiasm, ambition, and idealism and start getting lost in the flurry of a challenging beginning . Providing some kind of support to novice teachers seems essential to retain them within the profession and to develop them as potential professionals (Saban, 2002).
Why Mentoring?
April 10, 2023
Some benefits of mentoring:
Providing opportunities to learn and grow (Forbes, 2004)
Providing opportunities for personal and professional development (Miller, 2002)
enhancing self-confidence and job satisfaction (Douglas, 2007)
development of a support system resulting in increased levels of genuine, and freely given, trust and respect (AFSPC, 2000)
April 10, 2023
Types of Mentoring ClassicMentoring
Developmental Mentoring
‘Receive’ assistance/ sponsorship
Partnership based on trust,ongoing support, common purpose, & mutual learning
ClassicMentoring
‘Receive’ assistance/ sponsorship
April 10, 2023
Successful Mentoring?
While induction has shown to increase teacher retention, effective induction support and development programs as mentoring are rare, (Levine, 2006).
In case mentoring practices are properly implemented, mentees’ feelings of satisfaction, trust, appreciation and acceptance in the mentoring programs will increase (Ismail et al., 2010).
Qualified Mentor!
A qualified mentor is generally a person who possesses certain qualities or is in a position of authority, and who kindly watches over a younger individual so that he may benefit from the mentor’s support and advice (St-Jean & Mathieu, 2011).
Successful Mentor characteristics
Jonson (2002): Good listener Knowledgeable People oriented Good motivator Patient Nonjudgmental Empathetic Sensitive to mentee’s needs Effective & successful teacher (role model)
April 10, 2023
Method Participants
EFL teachersN=10 Iranian first year English teachersCompleted a 4-year program in TEFLAged 22-25
Exp. G. (Mentees)N=5 (F=4, M=1)
Cont. G. (Non-mentees) N=5 (F=3, M=2)
April 10, 2023
Method Participants
Mentors N=5 (F 2, M 3) 13-20 years of experience in TEFL Aged 40-53
April 10, 2023
Method Instruments
Classroom Observation Form (COF) Instructional method, lesson planning, use of language tasks,
classroom management, types of interaction, assessing learners’ progress, use of props and audio-visual materials, self-confidence and emotional stability
Three times per sem. Adapted from Barrett (2003)
Interviews Before and after sessions (once a week) (5-15 mins) Final interviews (30 mins)
Adapted from Johnson & Birkeland (2003) Self-report Survey
significance of induction program
April 10, 2023
Method cont.
PlaceHafez Language School, Mashhad-Iran
LengthTwo consecutive semesters
1st sem. (September 2009 – December 2009) 2nd sem. (January 2010 – March 2010)
April 10, 2023
Method cont. Procedure
Assigning a school mentor for each menteeMentees received induction support from
Mentors (personal meetings and classroom observations)
In-service program (1 workshop & 2 supervisor-directed meeting)
Non-mentees received induction support from initial training (one-week orientation & TTC
program) In-service program (as above)
April 10, 2023
Result
Quantitative Analysis Employing independent t-tests (COF):
No significant differences between 2 groups at the beginning and during the 1st sem.
Mentees group significantly outperformed non-mentees group at the end and during 2nd sem. on lesson planning, use of language tasks, types of interaction, use of props and audio-visual materials, self-confidence and emotional stability
April 10, 2023
Results
Quantitative AnalysisEmploying independent t-tests (self-report
Survey): Mentees group significantly scored higher than
non-mentees group on Feeling more confident as effective teacher 83% Agreeing on more reflective role in classroom 78% Feeling more confident to plan effectively
77%
April 10, 2023
Results Qualitative Analysis
Interviews Mentees
feeling more confident being more reflective giving more feedback to learners being more supportive to learners developing more job satisfaction being more systematic in decision making feeling more comfortable in classroom management Developing a more positive atmosphere in classroom
April 10, 2023
Results
Qualitative Analysis Interviews
Non-mentees developing a clear picture of instructional methodology learning to make better tests becoming more familiar with the school standards developing workable lesson plans feeling more comfortable in classroom
management
April 10, 2023
Views on Mentors:
Opportunities & Challenges
Negative Focusing on a different
approach compared to induction program
Offering a lot of advice Little acknowledgement of
my personal strength Unrealistic expectations Often judgmental Very formal Too much reflection
Positive Trustworthy Collaborative Empathetic Role model Good listener Approachable Understanding
April 10, 2023
Conclusions
Induction program (both in-service training and mentoring) foster development of teacher expertise.
A mixed approach seems more effective than single induction program.
Mentees should be given opportunity to choose their own mentors.
Mentors also need ongoing mentor development programs. Mentees need orientation on how a mentor can develop their
profession. Integrative (formal & informal) mentoring approach may enhance
a more positive atmosphere. Dynamic mentoring can make the process more interactive and
mutually encouraging.
Final Words!
“Coming together is a beginning,keeping together is progress,
but working together is a success.”
Anonymous