7. REFERENCES

Abdullaev, I.K. 1962. Utilization of triploidy in the development of high yielding

forms of mulberry for the silkworm. Agrobiology 61-65 (Russian), Plant

Breed. Abstr., 3630:459.

Aleksandrov, A.1988. The rooting ability of some promising cultivars of mulberry

(Genus Morus L.,). Rasteniev-D. Nauki, 25(3):67-73.

Alrneida, J.E., Soares, A.R. Ramalho, M.A.P. and Fonseca, T.C. 1991.

Phenotypical stability in the mulberry. Sericologia 31(30):475-478.

Amirthadevarathinam, A., Sankarapandian, P. and Natarajan, M. 1990.

Phenotypic stability for grain yield in certain breeding lines and varieties of

grain cum fodder sorghum. Madras Agric. J., 77(9-12): 368-371.

Anido, F.L., Cravero, V., Asprelli, P., Firpo, T., Garcia, S.M. and Cointry, E. 2004.

Heterotic patterns in hybrids involving cultivar-groups of summer squash,

Cucurbita pep0 L. Euphytica 135 (3):355-360.

Arunachalam, V. 1989. Genetic bases of plant breeding. In: Plant Breeding -

Theory and Practice. V.L.Chopra (Ed). Oxford and IBH Publishing Co Ltd.,

New Delhi.

Badalov, N.G. 1971. Result of testing the triploid mulberry variety Khanalar - Tut.

for silkworm feeding spring, summer and autumn. Plant Breed. Abstr.,

42(4): 1038.

Baksh, S., Kaul, S., Kumar, M., Singh, Y., Raj, S. Mukherjee, P. 1992. Screening

of mulberry genotypes for higher rooting. National Conference on mulberry

sericulture research, CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-1 1 December, 4992, pp.1.

Bari, M.A., Qaiyyum M.A., Islam, M and Ahmed, S.U. 1988a. Comparative

evaluation of morphological characters of some open pollinated progenies

and parental lines of mulberry. Sericologia 28(4):509-516.

Bari, M.A., Qaiyyum M.A., Islam, M and Ahmed, S.U. 1988b. Estimates of genetic

variability for some quantitative characters in mulberry. International

congress on Tropical sericultural practices (Bangalore), Feb 18-23, 1988.

Bari, M.A., Qaiyyum, M.A. and Ahmed, S.U. 1989. Correlation studies in mulberry

(Morus alba L., ). Indian J. Seric., 28:11-17.

Bari, M.A., Qaiyyum, M. and Ahmed, Su, 1990. Stability of leaf yield in some

selected genotypes of mulberry (Morus alba L.). Indian J . Seric. 29:88-92.

Becker, H.C. 1981. Correlations among some statistical measures of phenotypic

stability. Euphytica 30:835-840.

Benchamin, K.V. 1989. Bioassay techniques for evaluation of mulberry leaf

quality. In: Genetic Resources of mulberry and its utilization, CSR&TI,

Mysore, pp. 159-1 74.

Bhat, G. and Hittalmani, S. 1992. Clonal difference in mulberry (Morus spp.) for

root growth parameters. lndian J. Seric. 31(1):5-8.

Bindroo, B.B., Fotadar, R.K. and Anil Dhar. 1996. Propagation of mulberry under

sub-tropical conditions. lndian Silk 34(9):11-15.

Bindroo, B.B., Tiku, A.K. and Javid, G.N. 1983. Studies on the propagation of

mulberry under temperate climatic conditions - Part I - Propagation through

hard wood cuttings. National Seminar on Silk Research and Development,

Bangalore, India, p. 108.

Bindroo, B.B., Tiku, A.K. and Pandit, R.K. 1990. Variation of some metric traits in

mulberry varieties. lndian For., 116(4):320-324.

Birari, D.S., Birari, S.P. and Jamadagni, B.M. 1993. Stability analysis of promising

genotypes of cow pea. lndian J. Agric. Sci., 63(2):103-106.

Bongale, U.D. (2000). Productivity alleviation in mulberry cultivation - An

appraisal. National Conference on Strategies for Sericulture Research and

Development, Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore,

pp 34-37.

Bongale, U.D. and Chaluvachari (1993). Evaluation of four mulberry varieties by

leaf biochemical analysis and bioassay with Bombyx mori L. J. Indian Bot.

SOC., 72: 59-62.

Breese, B.L. 1969. The measurement and significance of genotype-environment

interaction in grasses. Heredity 24:27-44.

Bucio-Alanis,L. 1966. Environmental and genotype - environmental components

of variability. II.Heterozygotes. Heredity 21:399-405.

Bucio-Alanis,L. and Will, J. 1966. Enivironmental and genotype-environmental

components of variability. II. Heterozygotes. Heredity 21:399-405.

Bucio-Alanis, L., Perkins, J.M. and Jinks, J.L. 1969. Environmental and genotype

environmental components of variability. V. Segregating generations.

Heredity 24:115-127.

Burton, G.W. 1952. Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proc. 6th Int. Grass land

Cong., 1 : 227-283.

Cafarov, N.A. and Abbasov, A.A. 1977. The effect of ploidy and other factors on

the increase in rooting ability of mulberry cuttings. Azerb elmitadgigat

impakcillinst asarlar termat macmrsac, 9:lO-15.

Ceccarelli, S. 1994. Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions.

Euphytica 77:205-219.

Chaitanya, K.V., Masilamani, S. and Reddy, A.R. 2002. Photosynthetic rates and

biomass productivity in four mulberry cultivars. 2nd International Congress of

Plant Physiology, New Delhi, 8-12 January.

Chaluvachari and Bongale, U.D. 1994. Evaluation of leaf quality of some

germplasm genotypes of mulberry through chemical analysis and bioassay

with silkworm, Bombyx mori L. lndian J. Seric., 34:127-132.

Chauhan, S.K. and Kulshrestha, A.K. 2003. Women uplift mulberry sericulture

enterprise. lndian Farming 52(11):21-22.

Chaturvedi, H.K. and Sarkar, A. 2000. Optimum size and shape of the plot for

mulberry experiments. lndian J. Seric. 39(1):66-69.

Choudhusy, P.C., Shukla, P., Ghosh, A., Mallikarjuna, B. and Sengupta, K. 1991.

Effect of spacing, crown height and method of pruning on mulberry leaf yield,

quality and cocoon yield. Indian J. Seric., 30(1): 46-53.

Clarke, J.M. and Mccaig, T.N. 1982. Evaluation of techniques for screening for

drought resistance in wheat. Crop Sci., 22:503-506.

Coffman, W.R. and Smith, M.E. 1991. Role of public, industry and International

research centre breeding programmes in developing germplasm for

sustainable agriculture. In: D.A.Sleeper, T.C.Barkar and P.J.Bramal-Cox

(&.). Plant breeding and sustainable agriculture, Consideration for

objectives and methods, pp.1-9, CSSA Special publication no.18.

Comstock, R.E, and Moll, R.H. 1963. Genotype x environment interactions.

Symposium on statistical genetics and plant breeding. NAS-NRC Publ. 1982.

Cooper, M., Stucker, R.E., DeLacy, I.H. and Harch, B.D. Wheat breeding

nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop

Sci. 37:1168-1176.

Dandin, S.B. 1989. Role of mulberry varieties in sericulture industry. Indian Silk

28(6): 11-1 9.

Dandin, S.B. and Jolly, M.S. 1986. Mulberry descriptor. Sericologia 26:(465-475).

Dandin, S.B. and Kumar, R. (1989). Evaluation of mulberry genotypes for different

growth and yield parameters. In: Genetic Resources of Mulberry and its

Utilisation. Published by CSR&TI, Mysore, pp. 143-1 51.

Dandin S.B., Jolly, M.S. , Susheelamma, B.N., Mallikarjunappa, R.S. and Sastry,

C.R. 1983. Evaluation and utilization of existing genetic variability in

mulberry. National Seminar on Silk Research and Development, Bangalore,

March 10-13,p.2.

Dandin, S.B., Venugopalapillai, S. and Sengupta, K. 1988. Guidelines for raising

mulberry saplings on commercial scale. Published by Central Sericultural

Research and Training Institute, Mysore, pp 1-12.

Das, B.C. and Krishnaswamy, S. (1969). Estimation of components of variations of

leaf yield and its traits in mulberry. J. Seric. Sci. Japan., 38:242-248.

Das, B.C. and Prasad, D.N. 1974. Evaluation of some tetraploid and triploid

mulberry varieties through chemical analysis and feeding experiments. Indian

J. Seric., 13:17-22.

Das, C., Misra, A.K., Sengupta, T. and Das, B.K. 2003. C-1730 mulberry suits to

chronic drought prone red laterite soild of West Bengal. Indian Farming

52(10): 12-14.

Das, S.Y. and Chakraborty, S. 1998. Genetic variation for seed yield and its

components in green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Advances in Plant

Science 11(1):271-273.

Datta, R.K. 1998. Utilisation of mulberry and silkworm germplasm and importance

of data base management. National seminar on mulberry and silkworm

germplasm, Central Sericultural Germplasm Resources Centre, Hosur, ppl.

Dewey, O.R. and Lu, K.H. 1959. A correlation and path coefficient analysis of

components of crested wheat grass seed production. J. Agron., 57515-518.

Dickerson, G.E.1955. Genetic slippage in response to selection for multiple

objectives. Cold Spring Harbour Symposia on Quantitative Biology 20213-

Dwivedi, N.K., Suryanarayana, N., Sikdar, A.K., Susheelamma, B.N. and Jolly,

M.S. 1989. Cytomorphological studies in triploid mulberry evolved by

hybridization of female gamete cells. Cytologia 54(1):13-19.

Dzhafarov, N.A. and Abbasov, S.N. 1967. The hybridization of mulberry forms and

the study of their progeny. Trans. Az. Seri. Res. Inst. Silk Prod., pp. 67-84.

Dzhafarov, N.A. and Abbasov, S.N. 1970. Hybridization of polypioids and its

importance in seed production in mulberry. In: Polyploidya U Shelkovitry,

MOSCOW, pp.168-173.

Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing

varieties. Crop Sci., 6:36-40.

Finlay, K.W. and Wilkinson, G.N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant

breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14:742-754.

Fisher, R.A. and Yates, F. 1967. Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and

medical research. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburg.

Fotadar,R.K.1989. Use of hormones in mulberry propagation. Indian Silk 28:17-28.

Fotadar, R.K. 2002. Correlation and path analysis in mulberry. In: Advances in

Indian Sericulture Research. Published by Central Sericultural Research and

Training Institute, Mysore, pp 11-13.

Francis, T.R. and Kannenberg, L.W. 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season

maize. 1. A descriptive method for grouping genotpes. Can. J. Plant Sci.,

58:1029-1034.

Frey, K.J. 1964. Adaptation reaction of strains selected under stress and non-

stress environmental conditions. Crop Sci., 4:55-58.

Gabriel, K.R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to

principal component analysis. Biometrika 58:453-467.

Gauch, H.G. and Zobel, R.W. 1996. AMMl analysis of yield trials p.1-40. In

M.S.Kang and H.G.Gauch (ed.) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC

Press. Boca Raton, FL.

Gauch, H.G. and Zobel, R.W. 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting

genotypes. Crop Sci. 37:311-326.

Goel, A.K., Ravindran, S., Anandarao, A., Girish Naik, V., Tikader, A., Mukherjee,

P. Sekar, S. 1998. Variability in rooting parameters at juvenile stage in

mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm. Indian J. Seric. 37(2):109-112.

Hamada, S. 1959. Principles in high yielding in mulberry culture. J. Silkworm T-

11.8:125-132.

Hanson, C.H., Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. 1956. Biometrical studies of

yield in segregating population of Korean laspedaza. Agron. J., 48:262-272.

Hartman, H.T. and Kester, D.E. 1978. Plant propagation - Principles and

Practices. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp.662.

Henry, A. and Daulay, H.S. 1990. Phenotypic stability for seed yield in safflower

(Carthamus tinctorius L.). Madras Agric. J., 77 (9-1 2):47 1-473.

Honda, T. 1970. Studies on propagation of mulberry trees by cuttings. Bull. Seric.

Exp. Stn., 24(1): 231-236.

Honda, T. 1972. Technical problems on mulberry cuttings in Japan. JARQ,

6(4):235-239.

Ito, T. 1963. Nutrition of silkworm. Indian J. Seric., 1:15-17.

Jatindranath Swain (2001). Status paper of sericulture in Tamil Nadu. National

Seminar on Mulberry Sericulture Research in India. Karnataka State

Sericulture Research and Development Institute, Bangalore, pp 21-23.

Jinks, J.L. and Stevens, J.M. 1959. The components of variation among family

means in different crosses. Genetics 44:297-308.

Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F. and Cornstock, R.F. (4955). Estimates of genetic

and environmental variability in soyabean. Agron. J., 47:314-318.

Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F. and Cornstock, R.F. (1955a). Genotypic and

phenotypic correlations in soybean and their implications in selection. Agron.

J., 47:477-483.

Jolly, M.S. and Dandin, S.B. 1986. Collection, conservation and evaluation of

mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm. Central Sericultural Research and

Training Institute, Mysore, India. pp. 1-10.

Joshi, A and Kohli, U.K. 2003. Genetic divergence for quantitative and qualitative

traits in tomato (Hycopersicon esculentum). Indian J . Agric. Sci., 73(2):110-

113.

Kamble, C.K. 1988. Multilocatinal trials of new mulberry varieties at Government

farms. Indian Silk 27(1):42-45.

Kang, M.S.1990. Genotype-by-environment interaction and plant breeding. Dept

of Agronomy, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouga, LA.

Kang, M.S. and Gauch, H.G. 1996. Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC

Press, Boca Raton, FL.)

Kang, M.S. and Miller, J.D. 1984. Genotype x environment interactions for cane

and sugar yield and their implications in sugarcane breeding. Crop Sci.

241435-440.

Kang, M.S., Miller, J.D. and Darrah, L.L. 1987. A note on relationship between

stability variance and ecovalence. Journal of Heredity 78:107.

Kasiviswanathan, K., Krishnaswami, S. and Venkataramu, C.V. 1973. Effect of

storage on the moisture content of mulberry leaves. Indian J. Seric.12:13-21.

Khanure, S.K., 1999. Stability analysis for grain protein content in Rabi Sorghum.

Madras Agric. J., 86(1-3):49-50.

Krishnaswami, S. 1986. Mulberry cultivation in South India. Central Silk Board,

Bangalore. Pp 19-23.

Kroonenberg, P.M. 1995. Introduction to biplots for GxE tables. Res. Rep. 51.

Dep. Of Mathematics, Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Kumar, P., Bhutia, R. and Ahsan, M.M. 1993. Sericulture is a remunerative in the

Darjeeling hills. Indian Farming 43(2):22-25.

Kundu, S, and Khurana, S.R. 1988. Stability for seed yield and its components in

toria (Brassica campestris). Indian J. Genet., 48(3):389-391.

Landauski, M.M. 1951. Preliminary study of the different factors influencing the

rooting of mulberry cuttings. Revue Du Ver a Soie., 11 1 :259-269.

Lerner, L.M. 1954. Genetic homeostasis. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburg.

Lewis, D. 1954. Gene-environment interaction. A relationship between dominance

heterosis, phenotypic stability and variability. Heredity 8:333-356.

Lin, C.S., Binns, M.R. and Lefkovitch, L.P. 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we

stand? Crop Sci., 26:894:900.

Lush, J.L. (1949). Heritability of quantitative characters in farm animal. Hereditas

(SUPPI.) 35:356-357.

Luthra, O.P., Singh, R.K. and Kakar, S.N. 1974. Comparison of different stability

models in wheat. Theoretical Applied Genetics 45:143-149.

Mala, V.R. and Basavaiah, 1991. lmprovement of rooting ability in selection

variety. lndian Silk, 30(8): 26-28.

Ma, B.L., Yan, W., Dwyer, L.M., Fregeau-Reid, J., Voldeng, H.D., Dion, Y. and

Nass, H. 2004. Graphic analysis of genotypes, environment, nitrogen

fertilizer and their interactions on Spring wheat yield. Agron. J. 96:169-180.

Manual, W.W., Vivekananda, P. and Ranganathan, T.B. 1997. G x E interaction in

short duration rice. Madras Agric. J. 84(2):89-91.

Masilamani, S., Nagaraj, B. and Thiagarajan, V. 1996a. Pruning of mulberry for

economic leaf yields under hill conditions. lndian Farming 46(3):17-20.

Masilamani, S. and Kamble, C.K. 1998. Genetic variation, heritability, correlation

and path analysis in mulberry. Madras Agric. J., 85(1):41-44.

Masilamani, S., Sarkar, A., Jayaswal, K.P., Sudhakaran, M. and Datta, R.K. 2000a.

Regional adaptation of V1 mulberry genotype in the hill areas. National

Conference on strategies for sericulture research and development, CSR&TI,

Mysore, India, 16-1 8, November 2000. p.12.

Masilamani, S., Thiagarajan, V. and Balasubramanian, S. 1996b. Stability analysis

for leaf yield in mulberry (Morus alba L.). lndian J. Agric. Sci., 66(2):117-118.

Masilarnani, S., Thiagarajan, V., Nagaraj, 6. and Balasubramanian, S. 2000b.

Genetic variation, heritability and path analysis in mulberry. Sericulture in

India. &: Agarwal H.O. and Seth, M.K. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh,

Dehradun, India. pp:517-526.

Masilamani, S., Thiagarajan, V., Susheelamma., B.N. and Datta, R.K. 1996c. Path

analysis for leaf yield components in mulberry (Morus spp.) grown under high

altitude conditions. Sericologia 36(3):461-467.

Mather, K. and Jones, R.M. 1958. Interaction of environment in continious

variation. 1. Description. Biometrics 14:343-359.

Minarnizawa, K. 1997. Moriculture - Science of Mulberry Cultivation (Translated

from Japanese by Hirano, H. and Kuriok, A.) Oxford and IBH Publishing Pvt.

Ltd., New Delhi, India.

Misra, A.K., Das, B.K. and Ahsan, M.M. 1995. High yielding BC-2-59 mulberry

variety is suitable for Darjeeling hills. Indian Farming 44(11):30-31.

Misra, R.C. and Ahmed, M. (1987). Manual on Irrigation Agronomy. Oxford and

IBH Publishing Co. Pvt., New Delhi, p.412.

Mohanty, A.R and Dhas, R.A.C. 1995. Prospects of sericulture industry in Tamil

Nadu by 2001. lndian Silk, March, 1995.

Mukund , V.K. 1987. Control of soil acidity for better mulberry growth. lndian silk

25(11):20-22.

Nagarajan, R. 1983. Studies on genotypic-environment interactions in selected

sugarcane cultivars for various yield and quality attributes. Ph.D. thesis,

TNAU.

Nanavaty, M.M. 1965. Silk from grub to glamour. Paramount Publishing House,

Bombay, India.

Narayan Praksh, R., Periasamy, K and Radhakrishnan, S. (1985). Effect of

dietary water content on food utilization and silk production in Bombyx mori L.

(Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). lndian J. Seric., 24: 12-17.

Nelson, R.L. and Schweitzer, L.E. 1988. Evaluating soyabean germplasm for

specific leaf weight. Crop Sci., 28:647-649.

Ogiere, M. 1978. Time for assessing various characters in mulberry breeding.

Bull. Seric. Expt. Stn., 27(2):243-278.

Panse, V. G. 1957. Genetics of quantitative characters in relation to plant

breeding. lndian J. Genet., 17:318-328.

Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1967. Statistical methods for agricultural

workers. Indian Council of Agril. Research, New Delhi.

Paroda, R.S. and Hayes, J.D. 1971. An investigation of genotype-environment

interactions for rate of ear emergence in Spring barley. Heredity 26:157-175.

Patil, S.V., Mallikarjunappa, R.S., Bongale, U.D. and Dandin, S.B. 2000. Genetic

parameters in relation to leaf yield in mulberry (Morus alba L.,). Proc.

National Seminar on Tropical Sericulture, December 28, Bangalore, 14-17 p.

Patil, V.S. 2002. Selection indexes for leaf yield parameters in mulberry (Morus

alba L.). Adv. Plant Sci., 15 (11):559-564.

Patil, S.V., Mallikarjunappa, R.S. and Eswara Rao, M.S. 2002. Heritability and

correlation for leaf yield parameters in mulberry (Morus alba L.). Advances in

Plant Sci., 15(11) :565-571.

Paul, D.C., Subba Rao, G. and Deb, D.C. 1992. Impact of dietary moisture on

nutritional indices and growth of Bombyx mori and concomitant larval

duration. J. Insect Physiol., 38(3):229-235.

Perkins, J.M. and Jinks., J.L. 1968. Environmental and genotype environmental

components of variability. III.Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23:339-356.

Plaisted, R.L. and Peterson, L.C. 1959. A technique for evaluating the ability of

selection to yield consistency in different locations and seasons. Potato J.,

361381-385.

Prakash, B.G., Sarkar, A. and Chaturvedi, H.K. 1994. Selection environment in

mulberry (Morus spp.) by joint scoring of yield and its components. Proc. of

7'h International Congress of SABRA0 and WSAA, Vol.1: 333-337.

Prakash, B.G., Sarkar, A., Chaturvedi, H.K. and Bajpai, A.K., 1992. Variability in

some crosses of mulberry. National Conference on mulberry sericulture

research, CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-11 December, 1992, pp.4.

Prasad, D.N. 1989. Multilocational trials of mulberry. In: Genetic Resources of

mulberry and utilization. m: K.Sengupta and S.B.Dandin, CSR&TI, Mysore, pp 203-21 0.

Prasad, R.N., Sarkar, A., Chaturvedi, H.K. and Datta, R.K. 1992. Variability in

seedling vigour in mulberry. National Conference on mulberry sericulture

research, CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-11 December, 1992, pp.5.

Prasad, R.N., Sarkar, A., Ctaaturvedi, H.K. and Datta, R.K. 1995. Relationship of

seed size and early vigour to field performance of adult plants in mulberry.

Proc. Of XV international Sericuiture Commission Congress, Bondung,

Indonesia.

Rahman, M.S., Sarkar, A., Chaturvedi, H.K. 1994. Association of characters of

leaf production in germplasm mulberry varieties. Bull. Sericult. Res., 5:9-13.

Rajarathinam, S. and Subbaraman, N. 1997. Regression analysis of genotype x

environment interaction in hirsuturn cotton genotypes. Madras Agric. J.,

84(4): 228-229.

Raju, H.L., Sathyan, B.A. and Rangaiah, S. 1992. Studies on genetic variability,

correlation and path analysis in M I generation in mulberry (Morus indica L.,).

National Conference on mulberry sericulture research, CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-

11 December, 1992, pp.19.

Rangaswamy,G., Narasimhanna, M.N., Sastry, C.R and Jolly, M.S., 1976.

Sericulture manual 1. Mulberry cultivation, FAO, Rome, pp.25.

Rao, L.S.P. and Khan, A.A. 1963. Vegetative propagation of Japanese mulberry

varieties by use of growth regulators. Indian J. Seric., 1(3):7-23.

Rao, M.S.E., Dandin, S.B. and Mallikkarjunappa, R.S. 2002. Evaluation of

tetraploid and triploid mulberry genotypes for propagation, growth and yield

parameters. In: Advances in lndian Sericulture Research. Published by

Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore, pp 8-40.

Rasid Trag, A., Mistri, A.K. and Basharath, D.D. (2001). Strategies for the

development of sericulture in Jammu and Kashmir in the new millennium.

National Seminar on Mulberry Sericulture Research in India. Karnataka State

Sericulture Research and Development Institute, Bangalore, ppll-17.

Ravi, K.N., Hittalmani, S., Shankar, M.A. and Varangabhushana, 1992a. Stability

analysis for qualitative parameters in mulberry (Morus spp.,). National

Conference on mulberry sericulture research, CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-1 1

December, 1992, pp.6.

Ravi, K.N., Hittalmani, S. and Shashidhar, H.E. 1992b. Stability analysis of leaf

yield in mulberry. National Conference on mulberry sericulture research,

CSR&TI, Mysore, 10-1 1 December, 1992, pp.7.

Ravikumar, C. 1988. Western ghats as a bivoltine region- Prospects, challenges

and strategies for its development. Indian Silk 26 (9):39-54.

Roy, B.N., Das, B.C. and Prasad, D.N. 1983. Study of some traits of mulberry

towards its effective selection. National Seminar of Silk Research and

Development, Bangalore, March 10-13, p.57.

Rubio, J., Cubero, J.I., Martin, L.M., Suso, M.J., Flores, F. 2004. Biploy analysis of

trait relations of white lupin in Spain. Euphytica 135(2):217-224.

Sahu, P.K., Yadav, B.R.D. and Saratchandra, B. 1995. Evaluation of yield

component in mulberry germplasm varieties. Acta Bot.lndica 23(2):191-195.

Saini, S.S., Sindhu, G.S., Ish Kumar and Goombar, T.S., 1974. Phenotypic

stability for yield of some rice varieties. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 44544-647.

Salisbury, F.B. and Ross, C.W. 1984. Hormones and growth regulators, auxins

and gibberellins. In: Plant Physiology, Ill Edition, CBS Publishers, Delhi,

India, pp.309-319.

Sarkar, A. 1993. Effects of feeding different races of silkworm (Bombyx mori L.)

with mulberry (Morus indica L.) leaves varying in ploidy level. Sericologia

33125-34.

Sarkar, A., Das, B.C. and Chakraborty, S.P. 1986. Yield stability in mulberry.

Indian J. Agric. Sci., 56(4):305-306.

Sarkar, A., Chaturvedi, H.K. and Datta, R.K. 1992. Use of indirect selection in

mulberry. Proc. Of fourth All India Conference on cytology and genetics

symposium on mulberry and silkworm organized by Society of Cytologists and

Geneticists, India: 131-1 32.

Sarkar, A., Roy, B.N., Gupta, K.K. and Das, B.C. (1987). Character association in

mulberry under close planting. lndian J. Seric., 26(2):76-78.

Sastry C,R., Jolly, MS., Subramaniam, M.R. and Madhava Rao, Y.R. 1988.

Studies on the varietal differences in the loss of moisture from harvested

mulberry leaves. Indian J. Seric., 27(2):85-91.

Satish Rao, C. 1989. Stability analysis of varietal performance under optimal and

sub-optimal environments in sugar cane. Ph.D., thesis, Kurukshetra Univ.

Sau, H., Sahu, P.K., Yadav, B.R.D. and Saratchandra, B. 1995. Evaluation of

mulberry (Morus spp.,) genetic resources- sprouting, survival and rooting

ability. J. Environ, Res., 3:ll-13.

Sengupta, K., Singh, B.D. and Mustafi, J.C. (1971). A study on the effect of time of

harvest of mulberry leaf on silkworm cocoon crop and cocoon quality. lndian

J. Seric. 10:l-5.

Sharma, S.M., 1987. Studies on propagation, growth and yield attributes of some

mulberry (Morus spp.,) genotypes. STS dissertation, ICTRETS, CSR&TI,

Mysore.

Shukla, G.K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-

environmental components of variability. Heredity 29:237-245.

Sikdar, A.K. 1990. Qualitative and quantitative improvement of mulberry (Morus

spp.) by induction of polyploidy. Ph.D., Thesis, University of Mysore, Mysore,

India. pp. 114-125.

Singh, P. 1996. Essentials of plant breeding. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, p90.

Singh, K.P., Gowda, P. and Rarnesh Babu, M.1993. Package of practices of

mulberry cultivation in the Nilgiris. Indian Farming 43(2):20-21.

Singh, P. and Narayanan, S.S. 1993. Biometrical techniques in plant breeding.

Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, p.83.

Singh, U. and Singh, P. 1975. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability

in Lentil (Lens esculenta Moench.). Madras Agric. J., 62(9):57-58.

Singhvi, N.R. 2002. Interrelations among yield components and leaf yield in

mulberry. Plant Archives 2(2):295-296.

Singhvi, N.R., Chakraborty, S., Singhal, B.K., Rekha, M., Sarkar, A. and Datta,

R.K. 1998. Character association of leaf yield traits in mulberry. Bull. Sericul.

Res., 983-84.

Singhvi, N.R., Chakraborty, S., Singhal, B.K., Rekha, M., Sarkar, A. and Datta,

R.K. 2001a. Genetic analysis of leaf yield and its attributes in mulberry.

Advances in Plant Science, 14(1):105-109.

Singhvi, N.R., Chakraborty, S., Singhal, B.K., Rekha, M., Sarkar, A. and Datta,

R.K. 2001b. Cause and effect relationship of leaf yield in mulberry as

influenced by morphological and physiological traits in mulberry. Bull. Ind.

Acad. Seri., 5(2):31-33.

Sujathamma, P. and Dandin, S.B. 1998. Evaluation of mulberry (Morus spp.,)

genotypes for propagation parameters. Indian J. Seric., 37(2):133-136.

Sunil Holkar, V.K., Mishra, V.K. and Billore, S.D. 1991. Phenotypic stability of

seed yield in pigeon pea under dryland conditions. Crop Res., 4:247-252.

Susheelarnma, B.N. and Jolly, M.S. 1986. Evaluation of morpho-physiological

parameters associated with drought resistance in mulberry. Indian J. Seric.

25(1):6-14.

Susheelarnma, B.N., Jolly, MS., Giridhar, K., Dwivedi, N.K. and Suryanarayana,

N. 1988. Correlation and path analysis in mulberry under stress and non-

stress conditions. Sericologia 28(2):239-243.

Susheelarnma, B.N., Jolly, M.S. and Sengupta, K. 1989. Evaluation of germplasm

for stress tolerance. In: Genetic resources in mulberry and utilization,

K.Sengupta and S.B.Dandin (m), CSR&TI, Mysore, India, pp.153-158.

Susheelamma, B.N., Jolly, M.S., Sengupta, K., Giridhar, K., Baksh, S., Mogili, T.,

Mallikarjunappa, R.S. and Pavankumar, T. 1992a. Statistical analysis of

adaptability of drought resistant mulberry genotypes. Sericologia 32(4):619-

628.

Susheelamma, B.N., Kumar, J.S., Sikdar, A.K., Dandin, S.B., Jolly, M.S. and

Sengupta, K. 199213. Exploitation of promising mulberry germplasm

genotypes for yield potentiality. Sericologia, 32 (2): 295-300.

Susheelamma, B.N., Masilamani, S., Thiagarajan, V., Rajashekar, K. and Datta,

R.K. 1997. Semigraphical method of analyzing genetic variation in mulberry

(Morus spp.). Indian J. Plant Gent. Res., -l0(1):69-78.

Tai, G.C.C. 1971. Genotypic stability analysis and its application to potato regional

trials. Crop Sci. 11:184-190.

Tazima, Y. 1985. Report on sericulture industry in India. Central Silk Board,

Bangalore.

Thiagarajan, V., Masilamani, S., Ahsan, M.M. and Datta, R.K. 1994. Stability

analysis of economic traits in silkworm (Bombyx mori L.). J. Genet. & Breed.

48:357-364.

Tikader, A. 1997. Studies on heritabilities, genetic parameters and response to

selection in mulberry germplasm accession. Bull. Seric. Research, 8:19-22.

Tikader, A and Rao, A.A, 2002. Phenotypic variation in mulberry (Morus spp.)

Germplasm. Sericologia 42(2):221-233.

Tikader, A., Vijayan, K., Roy, B.N. and Pavan Kumar, T. 1996. Studies on

propagation efficiency of mulberry (Morus spp.,) at ploidy level. Sericologia

361345349.

Tojyo, 1 . 1985. Research of polyploidy and its application in Morus. JARQ

18r222-228.

Trethowan, R.M., Ginkel, M.V., Ammar, K., Crossa, J., Payne, T.S., Cukadar, B.,

Rajararn, S. and Hernandex, E. 2003. Associations among twenty years of

international bread wheat yield evaluation of environments. Crop

Sci.43:1698-1711.

Umesh, V (2001). Status of sericulture in Karnataka. National Seminar on

Mulberry Sericulture Research in India. Karnataka State Sericulture

Research and Development Institute, Bangalore, pp 34-37.

Venkateswaralu, 1 (2001). Status of sericulture in Andhra Pradesh, National

Seminar on Mulberry Sericulture Research in India. Karnataka State

Sericulture Research and Development Institute, Bangalore, pp 18-20..

Vijayan, K., Tikader, A., Chakroborti, S.P. and Roy, B.N. 1997. Correlation studies

in mulberry (Morus spp.). Indian J. Genet., 57:455460.

Vijayan, K., Tikader, A., Das, K., Roy, B.N. and Pavan Kumar, T. 1996. Genotypic

influence on leaf moisture content and moisture retention capacity in mulberry

(Morus sp.,). Bull. Sericult. Res., 7:95-98.

Weaver, R.J. and Johnson, J.O. 1985. Relation of plant hormones to nutrient

mobilization and the internal environment of the plant. Supply of mineral

nutrients and photosynthate. In: Encyclopaedia of plant physiology.

Hormones regulation of development , Pharsi, R.P. and Reddi, D.M. (m.), Springer Verlag, p.4.

Wricke, G. 1962. Uber eine Methode zur Erfassung der okologischen Streubreite

in Feldversuchen. Z. Pflanzenzuechi, 47:92-96.

Yan, W. 1999. Methodology of cultivar evaluation based on yield trial data - with

special reference in winter wheat in Ontario. Ph.D Thesis, University of

Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Yan, W. 2001. GGE biplot-a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-

environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron. J. 93:1111-

1118.

Yan, W., Corenelius, P.L., Crossa, J. and Hunt, L.A. 2001. Two types of GGE

biplots for analyzing multi-environment trial data. Crop Sci. 41:656-663.

Yan, W. and Hunt, L.A. 2002. Biplot analysis of diallel data. Crop Sci. 42:21-30.

Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Q. and Szlavnics, Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and

mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci.40:597-605.

Yan, W. and Kang, M.S. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders,

geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Yan, W. and Rajcan, 1. 2002. Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of

soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42:ll-20.

Yang, J.H. and Yang, X.H. 1991. Research on polyploidy and polyploidy breeding

in mulberry in China. Sericologia 31(4):625-630.

Yates, F. and Cochran, W.G. 1938. The analysis of group of experiment. J. Agric.

Sci., 28:556-580.

Yue G, Perng, S.K., Walter, T.L., Wassom, C.E. and Liang, G.H. 1990. Stability

analysis of yield in maize, wheat and sorghum and its implications in breeding

programme. Plant Breeding 104:72-80.