Upload
urbanomadic
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 6.Tadeja.Leskovsek
1/10
Regional Development and Governance Symposium
Innovation Enhancement
in Slovenian Regions
Tadeja Colnar Leskovek
Anteja ECG
Izmir, 26October 2007
7/27/2019 6.Tadeja.Leskovsek
2/10
What does it take for region to becomeinnovative?
Infrastructure conductive to Innovation
Educationsystem
Competition
Protection ofintelectual and
industrial property
Taxation
Legal and regulatoryenvironment
Administrativesimplification
DIVERSITY
NEW
INTER-
ACTIONS
SHARING
role
models
Conditions for
Innovation
Fostering
INNOVATION
CONCEPTS
CONSENSUS
BUILDING
LEADERSHIP
INNOVATIVE
REGIONS
vision
strategy
action
convergentdivergent
7/27/2019 6.Tadeja.Leskovsek
3/10
Cluster program forinnovation enhancement
Its overall success and its significant
experience make Slovenia the prime
candidate from which to learn about thesuccess drivers of cluster initiatives.
Its overall success and its significant
experience make Slovenia the prime
candidate from which to learn about thesuccess drivers of cluster initiatives.
The most prominent example is Slovenia,a country that has received much
attention for its cluster program and the
role clusters played in the impressive
performance of the Slovenian economy.
Slovenia is amongst the front runners of cluster
development in Europe
In Slovenia for instance, clusters are an
integrated tool of investment and innovation
policy, started in 1999.
7/27/2019 6.Tadeja.Leskovsek
4/10
Cluster program was part of proactiveindustrial policy
Improving enterprises
competitive capacity(4 measures)
Innovative environment
Internationalization
of SME
Increasing
productivity
Investment in
technologicaldevelopment
Networking and
clusterdevelopment
7/27/2019 6.Tadeja.Leskovsek
5/10
starting with mapping
Linking and networking was relatively weak.
Geographical (regional) dimension was not clear -dispersed throughout Slovenia.
Infrastructure which could support clusterdevelopment was only emerging.
Existing co-operations and flows could represent abasis for at least nine potential clusters.
Which cluster isstrategic for Slovenia?
How to developclusters?
which indicated:
7/27/2019 6.Tadeja.Leskovsek
6/10
... followed by measures to respond toidentified needs.
Measures aiming at
Promoting cooperation and
networking between
companies and between
companies and R&D
institutions
Developing clusters in practice
Pilot Projects
Objectives: To gain experiences and
develop knowledge
To strengthen linkages along
supply chains
To strengthen linkagesbetween R&D and business
To promote cluster concept
From supporting strategic clusters toa set of horizontal policy measures
7/27/2019 6.Tadeja.Leskovsek
7/10
Results achieved from 2001 to 2004were encouraging
17 clusters - networking of more than 300 enterprises(57.000 employees) and 40 support institutions,
4 technological networks - networking of 43 enterprises(30.000 employees) and 15 support institutions,
29 technology centers - co-operating of 240 enterprises,
53 enterprises (22.700 employees) introducing the systemfor continuous improvement in production, processes andtechnology.
7/27/2019 6.Tadeja.Leskovsek
8/10
Key success factors -Clear roles and competencies
Ministry of Economyacted ascatalyst of the clustering process
Providing co-financing of start-
up costs (40%) of clusterinitiatives (management,
projects)
Analysis
Facilitation
Training
International networking
7/27/2019 6.Tadeja.Leskovsek
9/10
Key success factors -Balanced Top Down And Bottom Up Process
Bottom-up process:
Measures not replacing market mechanism.
Decisions about areas (industries) of cluster development,
organizational and managerial issues are domain of participating
actors (firms and institutions).
No Constrains, no strict Rules, no guided Strategies.
Initiative and responsibility for success of business and clustering
remain domain of managers, employees and individuals.
7/27/2019 6.Tadeja.Leskovsek
10/10
Major challenge in implementingcluster policy
how to create trusting environment
Public policy cannot be developed in the absence of strong public
private partnership, which in return, can not be developed without
the culture of trust.
Trust is needed between partners, between employers and
employees between boards and shareholders, and between state
and citizens.