Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AGENDA ITEMS 12-15 February to 2015 Public Hearing
MEMORANDUM
February 62015
TO County Council
6D FROM Glenn Odin Deputy Council Staff Director
SUBJECT Public Hearing-supplemental appropriations and amendments to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Montgomery County Government White Flint West Workaround $9505000 (White Flint Special Tax District) Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads $3500000 (GO bonds) Resurfacing PrimaryArterial Roads $3700000 (GO bonds) and Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads $1000000 (GO bonds)
The Executive is recommending these four supplemental appropriations and CIP amendments The Transportation Infrastructure Energy and Environment (T ampE) Committee has tentatively scheduled a worksession on March 2 to review these recommendations
For each recommendation the Executives transmittal a draft resolution and a project description form is attached as follows
White Flint West Workaround copy1-6 Resurfacing ResidentialRural Roads copy7-tO Resurfacing PrimaryArterial Roads copy11-15 Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads copy16-19
forlinfy 1 Stampefyl S-20cip1 5021 Ohearing-resurfacing pdfsdoc
OFFICE OF mE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUMmiddot
January 15 2015
TO George Leventhal President County C~~
FROM
SUBJECT
Isiah Leggett County Executive q~ Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Impro~eents Program and Supplemental Appropriation 15-S1S-CMCG-9 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) $9505000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY15 Capital Budget and amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$9505000 for White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) Appropriation for this project will fund cons1ruction ofroadway and utility improvements for segments ofMain S1reetlMarket Street and Executive Boulevard Extended to support the Master Plan roadway vision in the White Flint area
1bis appropriation is needed because the contract for the Conference Center parking garage will be executed in FYI5 Segments ofMain StreetJMarket Street and Executive Boulevard Extended within the Conference Center property will be constructed by the Conference Center parking garage contractor A Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA) was signed between the Maryland Stadium Authority (MSA) and DOT in the spring 2014 The MOA is for construction ofa portion ofthe White Flint West Workaround roadwork to be included in MSA conference center parking garage design build procurement
This arrangement will allow the County to take advantage ofeconomies ofscale and reduce potential conflicts Based on the MSA schedule for the conference center parking garage expendituies and funding will need to be advanced and the appropriation ofcons1ruction funding for the roadway portion will need to be advanced to FYIS
CD
montgomerycountymdgov311 ~3~ bullbullbullbullIII 240-773-3556 TTYIMA
George Leventhal President Page 2 January 152015
The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because (1) the project offers the opportunity to achieve significant savings (2) the project supports significant economic development initiatives and (3) the project offers a significant opportunity that will be lost ifnot taken at this time
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$9505000 and specify the source of funds as White Flint - Special Tax District
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILnm
Attachment Amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 15-S15-CMCG-9
cc AI Roshdie~ Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
Resolution -------- shyhWrod~ ______________ Adopted _______
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY~MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 15-S15-CMCG-9 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTnmsportation White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) $9505~000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulatio~ or one that is approved after January I ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriati~ and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds White Flint West 501506 SIampU $5011000 White Flint shyWorkaround Construction $4494000 Special Tax District
TOTAL $9505000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 1S-SlS-CMCG-9 Page Two
4 This appropriation is needed because the contract for the Conference Center parking garage will be executed in FY15 Segments ofMain StreetIMarlret Street and Executive Boulevard Extended within the Conference Center property will be constructed by the Conference Centerparking garage contractor A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was signed between the Maryland Stadium Authority (MSA) and DOT in the spring 2014 The MOA is for construction ofa portion ofthe White Flint West Workaround roadwork to be included in MSA conference center parlcing garage design build procurement This arrangement will allow the County to take advantage ofeconomies of scale and reduce potential conflicts Based on the MSA schedule for the conference center parking garage expenditures and funding will need to be advanced and the appropriation ofConstruction funding for the roadway portion will need to be advanced to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $9505000 for White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) and specifies that the source of funds will be White Flint - Special Tax District
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds White Flint West 501506 SIampU $5011000 White Flint shyWorkaround Construction $4494000 Special Tax District
TOTAL $9505000
Ibis is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
White Flint West Workaround (P501506)
1IS15 categClly Tnmsportaionmiddot Date Last Modified 4ItfI14 Sub CateIJOlY Roads RequIred AdequaIe Pub6c Facility No Administering AgenoJ Transportation (AAGE3O) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Norlll Belhesda-Garlef1 Park SIaIus FITIIII Design Stage
6421
600
Site 1m and UtiIIes 25423
Construction 2945
0
Total
Tax District
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total 7
Data FIrst
FY15 First Cost Estimate
CUlIeI1t ~ FY15 62689 last FYs Cost EstimaIa 0
o o
Unencumbered Balance o
DesCription This project provides for land acquisition site improvements and utility (SIampU) relocations construction management and construction for one new road one new bikeway one relocated road and an intersection realignment improvement in the White Flint District area for Stage 1 Various improvements to the roads will include new traffic lanes shared-wgte paths undergrounding of overhead utility lines where required other utility relocations and streetscaping Preliminary and final engineering were funded through FY14 by White Flint District West Transportation (CIP 5(1116) The proposed projects for construction are 1Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new two-lane 1200-foot roadway 2Main StreetMarket Street (lB-1) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new 1200-f00t bikeway 3Executive Boulevard Extended (8-15) - Marine Road to Old Georgetown Road (MD1B7) - 900 feet of relocated four-lane roadway 41ntersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard including the approaches to Old Georgetown Road and the portion of Hoya Street from the intersection realignment of Hoya StreetOld Georgetown RoadlExecutive Boulevard to a point just north of the intersection to provide access to new development 5 Hoya Street (M-4A) - Montrose Parkway to the intersection of Old Georgetown Road - 1100 feet of reconstructed 4-Iane roadway
Estimated Schedule IS if +fttl h 1 Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Design in FY14through FY15 SIampU in FYi6through FY18 and construction in FYjalIdFV18 2 Main StreetIMarket Street (LB-1) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU in FY~rough FY1B and construction in FY-WaItfFY18 3 Executive Boulevard Extended (B-15) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU ana construction in FY16 through FY20 1( fflrtgtVlt h 4 Intersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY1B and construction in FY17 through FY19 5 Hoya Street (U-4A) - Design in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY18 and construction in FY17 through FY18 The schedule assumes that all land needed for road construction will be dedicated by the major developers in a timely manner The schedule also assumes the construction of conference center replacement parking will take place prior to the start of the roadway construction
Justification The vision for the White Flint District is for a more urban core with a walkable street grid sidewalks bikeways trans paths public use space parks and recreational facirlties mixed-use development and enhanced streetscape to improve the areas for pedestrian circulation and transit oriented development around the Metro station These road improvements along with other District roads proposed to be constructed by developers will fulfill the strategic program plan for a more etfactive and efficient transportation system The proposed improvements are in conformance with the White Flint Sector Plan Resolution 16-1300 adopted March 23 2010 Fiscal Note
Other The segments ofMain S1reetMarket Street and Executive Boulevard Extended that are adjacent to the (nf-- iPntP1 cit~ wilt h~ (ndn](~tfJd hv the contrac1nr oftne CnnfplPnlP (pont -p ln (__ n-
White ~lint West Workaround (P501506)
The uttimate funding source for these projecfs will be VVhite Flint Special Taxing District ~ revenues and related special obUgation bond issues Debt service on the special obligation bond issues WIll be paid solely from VVhite Flint Special Taxing District revenues Resolution No 16-1570 states that The Countys goal is that the VVhite Flint Special Taxing District special tax rate must not exceed len percent of the totaI1ax rate for the District except that the rate must be sufficient to pay debt service on any bonds that are already outstanding- If VVhite Flint Special Tax District revenues are not sufficient to fund these projects then the County will utiIize forward funcfmg advance funding and management ofdebt insurance or 19payment in a manner to oomply with the goal A pubDCgtprillate partnership Wll be considered to expecflie this project Disclosures A pedestrian impact analysis has been oompleted for this project
Coordination Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Washington Area Metropofllan Transit AuIhority City of Rockville State ~flghway Administration Town of Garrett Park Neighborhood Civic Associations DevelopeB
OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
Janwuy 152015
TO GeoIge Leven1hal President Countypi~___ FROM Isiah Leggett County Executive I~-
SUBJECT Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital ImprovJe~ ~gram and Supplemental Appropriation I2-SIS-CMCG-6 to the FYIS Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYIS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S I5-CMCG-6
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department of Transportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office of Management and Budget
montgomerycountymdgov311 _~__ 240-773-3556 TrY
--------Resolution fu~ ____________~
Adopred _______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 to the FYl5 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacmg ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
Background
1 Section 307 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County o~ or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may ina single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote of no fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residential Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 Page Two
4 This ~pp1ementa1 is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also J1e1p avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residentiall Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk of the Council
Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (P500511)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Highway Maintenance Requirad Adequate Public FaclJlty No Administeling Agency Transportation AAGE30 ReJocafion Impact None Planning Area Countywide status Ongoing
Total Thru FY13 EstFY14
Total 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Beyond 6 YI$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($OOOs) flU 1 nl
Planninc Desion and Supervision 9956 58 1423 8475 l1ifl~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ 0
Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Improvements and utirrties 0 0 0 0 0 LIIO d L IJ ~IO ~tuO qato 0
Construction 105663 bull 49574 8064 48025 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Other 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ~ 49amp77 9487 astib aiJt~ fiJ~ JI~i~ IJl1oieIt 17lampee D lIa qEt FUNONGS~ E ($ODDs
Current Revenue General 309 309 0 0 0 u AIISl J) 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 113738 41751 9481 58500 ~ale~fle 7mltl ~ ~ rO)
~ v
i58O IltI~
0
PAYGO 1617 1617 0 0 0 o bull o o r 0 I r 0 0
Total ~ 49677 9487 ~I~O Jil~ IIHe YMte-11 Meo I~ 0
II qur APPROPRIATION AND ~~~~RE DATA ODDs
IDate Flrst Appropriation FY 05 Flrst Cost Estimate I Current Scope FY 15 llaqflt~ Last FYs Cost Estimate 74866 Partial Closeout Thru 0 iNew Partial Closeout 0 IToml Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for the pennanent patching and resurfacing of rural and residential roadways using durable hot mix asphalt to restore long-tenn structural integrity to the aging rural and residential roadway infrastructure The County maintains a combined total of 4210 lane miles of rural and residential roads Preventative maintenance inciudes full-depth patching of distressed areas of pavement in combination with a new hot mix asphalt wearing surface of 1-inch to 2-inches depending on the levels of observed distress A portion of this work will be perfonned by the county in-house paving crew
Cost Change R~2ctf (Qllheq-o of ~oortlQlI~QtI~f4A)J ~9- ~Potl ~~ (eQf1 $1 dded to the a proved funding in FY15-17 to maintain core transportation I tofund significantly more costly rehabi I a on wor 5 million added in FY19 and FY20 to this ongoing level of effort project The additional f ent the need for more costly roa r ich is about five times more expensive and will addre lcant deterioration in the condition of many residential or rural roads Increase cos tional $ I Ion in FY14 supplementals Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily
traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair cost as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCl) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The latest 2013 survey indicated that the current cost of the countywide backJog on road repairs is $2111 million This represents 58 percent of total residential infrastructure pavement repair needs Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle
Other The design and planning stages as well as project construction will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (MSHTO) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) RuraVresidential road mileage has been adjusted to confonn with the State inventory of road mileage maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA) This inventory is updated annually Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 on residential and rural roads Related CiP projects include Pennanent Patching ResidentiaVRural Roads (501106) and Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary CommiSSion Washington Gas Light Company PEPCO Cable TV Verizon I United States Post Office
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
OFFICE OF mE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUMmiddot
January 15 2015
TO George Leventhal President County C~~
FROM
SUBJECT
Isiah Leggett County Executive q~ Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Impro~eents Program and Supplemental Appropriation 15-S1S-CMCG-9 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) $9505000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY15 Capital Budget and amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$9505000 for White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) Appropriation for this project will fund cons1ruction ofroadway and utility improvements for segments ofMain S1reetlMarket Street and Executive Boulevard Extended to support the Master Plan roadway vision in the White Flint area
1bis appropriation is needed because the contract for the Conference Center parking garage will be executed in FYI5 Segments ofMain StreetJMarket Street and Executive Boulevard Extended within the Conference Center property will be constructed by the Conference Center parking garage contractor A Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA) was signed between the Maryland Stadium Authority (MSA) and DOT in the spring 2014 The MOA is for construction ofa portion ofthe White Flint West Workaround roadwork to be included in MSA conference center parking garage design build procurement
This arrangement will allow the County to take advantage ofeconomies ofscale and reduce potential conflicts Based on the MSA schedule for the conference center parking garage expendituies and funding will need to be advanced and the appropriation ofcons1ruction funding for the roadway portion will need to be advanced to FYIS
CD
montgomerycountymdgov311 ~3~ bullbullbullbullIII 240-773-3556 TTYIMA
George Leventhal President Page 2 January 152015
The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because (1) the project offers the opportunity to achieve significant savings (2) the project supports significant economic development initiatives and (3) the project offers a significant opportunity that will be lost ifnot taken at this time
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$9505000 and specify the source of funds as White Flint - Special Tax District
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILnm
Attachment Amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 15-S15-CMCG-9
cc AI Roshdie~ Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
Resolution -------- shyhWrod~ ______________ Adopted _______
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY~MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 15-S15-CMCG-9 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTnmsportation White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) $9505~000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulatio~ or one that is approved after January I ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriati~ and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds White Flint West 501506 SIampU $5011000 White Flint shyWorkaround Construction $4494000 Special Tax District
TOTAL $9505000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 1S-SlS-CMCG-9 Page Two
4 This appropriation is needed because the contract for the Conference Center parking garage will be executed in FY15 Segments ofMain StreetIMarlret Street and Executive Boulevard Extended within the Conference Center property will be constructed by the Conference Centerparking garage contractor A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was signed between the Maryland Stadium Authority (MSA) and DOT in the spring 2014 The MOA is for construction ofa portion ofthe White Flint West Workaround roadwork to be included in MSA conference center parlcing garage design build procurement This arrangement will allow the County to take advantage ofeconomies of scale and reduce potential conflicts Based on the MSA schedule for the conference center parking garage expenditures and funding will need to be advanced and the appropriation ofConstruction funding for the roadway portion will need to be advanced to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $9505000 for White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) and specifies that the source of funds will be White Flint - Special Tax District
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds White Flint West 501506 SIampU $5011000 White Flint shyWorkaround Construction $4494000 Special Tax District
TOTAL $9505000
Ibis is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
White Flint West Workaround (P501506)
1IS15 categClly Tnmsportaionmiddot Date Last Modified 4ItfI14 Sub CateIJOlY Roads RequIred AdequaIe Pub6c Facility No Administering AgenoJ Transportation (AAGE3O) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Norlll Belhesda-Garlef1 Park SIaIus FITIIII Design Stage
6421
600
Site 1m and UtiIIes 25423
Construction 2945
0
Total
Tax District
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total 7
Data FIrst
FY15 First Cost Estimate
CUlIeI1t ~ FY15 62689 last FYs Cost EstimaIa 0
o o
Unencumbered Balance o
DesCription This project provides for land acquisition site improvements and utility (SIampU) relocations construction management and construction for one new road one new bikeway one relocated road and an intersection realignment improvement in the White Flint District area for Stage 1 Various improvements to the roads will include new traffic lanes shared-wgte paths undergrounding of overhead utility lines where required other utility relocations and streetscaping Preliminary and final engineering were funded through FY14 by White Flint District West Transportation (CIP 5(1116) The proposed projects for construction are 1Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new two-lane 1200-foot roadway 2Main StreetMarket Street (lB-1) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new 1200-f00t bikeway 3Executive Boulevard Extended (8-15) - Marine Road to Old Georgetown Road (MD1B7) - 900 feet of relocated four-lane roadway 41ntersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard including the approaches to Old Georgetown Road and the portion of Hoya Street from the intersection realignment of Hoya StreetOld Georgetown RoadlExecutive Boulevard to a point just north of the intersection to provide access to new development 5 Hoya Street (M-4A) - Montrose Parkway to the intersection of Old Georgetown Road - 1100 feet of reconstructed 4-Iane roadway
Estimated Schedule IS if +fttl h 1 Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Design in FY14through FY15 SIampU in FYi6through FY18 and construction in FYjalIdFV18 2 Main StreetIMarket Street (LB-1) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU in FY~rough FY1B and construction in FY-WaItfFY18 3 Executive Boulevard Extended (B-15) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU ana construction in FY16 through FY20 1( fflrtgtVlt h 4 Intersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY1B and construction in FY17 through FY19 5 Hoya Street (U-4A) - Design in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY18 and construction in FY17 through FY18 The schedule assumes that all land needed for road construction will be dedicated by the major developers in a timely manner The schedule also assumes the construction of conference center replacement parking will take place prior to the start of the roadway construction
Justification The vision for the White Flint District is for a more urban core with a walkable street grid sidewalks bikeways trans paths public use space parks and recreational facirlties mixed-use development and enhanced streetscape to improve the areas for pedestrian circulation and transit oriented development around the Metro station These road improvements along with other District roads proposed to be constructed by developers will fulfill the strategic program plan for a more etfactive and efficient transportation system The proposed improvements are in conformance with the White Flint Sector Plan Resolution 16-1300 adopted March 23 2010 Fiscal Note
Other The segments ofMain S1reetMarket Street and Executive Boulevard Extended that are adjacent to the (nf-- iPntP1 cit~ wilt h~ (ndn](~tfJd hv the contrac1nr oftne CnnfplPnlP (pont -p ln (__ n-
White ~lint West Workaround (P501506)
The uttimate funding source for these projecfs will be VVhite Flint Special Taxing District ~ revenues and related special obUgation bond issues Debt service on the special obligation bond issues WIll be paid solely from VVhite Flint Special Taxing District revenues Resolution No 16-1570 states that The Countys goal is that the VVhite Flint Special Taxing District special tax rate must not exceed len percent of the totaI1ax rate for the District except that the rate must be sufficient to pay debt service on any bonds that are already outstanding- If VVhite Flint Special Tax District revenues are not sufficient to fund these projects then the County will utiIize forward funcfmg advance funding and management ofdebt insurance or 19payment in a manner to oomply with the goal A pubDCgtprillate partnership Wll be considered to expecflie this project Disclosures A pedestrian impact analysis has been oompleted for this project
Coordination Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Washington Area Metropofllan Transit AuIhority City of Rockville State ~flghway Administration Town of Garrett Park Neighborhood Civic Associations DevelopeB
OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
Janwuy 152015
TO GeoIge Leven1hal President Countypi~___ FROM Isiah Leggett County Executive I~-
SUBJECT Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital ImprovJe~ ~gram and Supplemental Appropriation I2-SIS-CMCG-6 to the FYIS Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYIS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S I5-CMCG-6
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department of Transportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office of Management and Budget
montgomerycountymdgov311 _~__ 240-773-3556 TrY
--------Resolution fu~ ____________~
Adopred _______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 to the FYl5 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacmg ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
Background
1 Section 307 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County o~ or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may ina single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote of no fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residential Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 Page Two
4 This ~pp1ementa1 is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also J1e1p avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residentiall Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk of the Council
Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (P500511)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Highway Maintenance Requirad Adequate Public FaclJlty No Administeling Agency Transportation AAGE30 ReJocafion Impact None Planning Area Countywide status Ongoing
Total Thru FY13 EstFY14
Total 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Beyond 6 YI$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($OOOs) flU 1 nl
Planninc Desion and Supervision 9956 58 1423 8475 l1ifl~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ 0
Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Improvements and utirrties 0 0 0 0 0 LIIO d L IJ ~IO ~tuO qato 0
Construction 105663 bull 49574 8064 48025 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Other 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ~ 49amp77 9487 astib aiJt~ fiJ~ JI~i~ IJl1oieIt 17lampee D lIa qEt FUNONGS~ E ($ODDs
Current Revenue General 309 309 0 0 0 u AIISl J) 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 113738 41751 9481 58500 ~ale~fle 7mltl ~ ~ rO)
~ v
i58O IltI~
0
PAYGO 1617 1617 0 0 0 o bull o o r 0 I r 0 0
Total ~ 49677 9487 ~I~O Jil~ IIHe YMte-11 Meo I~ 0
II qur APPROPRIATION AND ~~~~RE DATA ODDs
IDate Flrst Appropriation FY 05 Flrst Cost Estimate I Current Scope FY 15 llaqflt~ Last FYs Cost Estimate 74866 Partial Closeout Thru 0 iNew Partial Closeout 0 IToml Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for the pennanent patching and resurfacing of rural and residential roadways using durable hot mix asphalt to restore long-tenn structural integrity to the aging rural and residential roadway infrastructure The County maintains a combined total of 4210 lane miles of rural and residential roads Preventative maintenance inciudes full-depth patching of distressed areas of pavement in combination with a new hot mix asphalt wearing surface of 1-inch to 2-inches depending on the levels of observed distress A portion of this work will be perfonned by the county in-house paving crew
Cost Change R~2ctf (Qllheq-o of ~oortlQlI~QtI~f4A)J ~9- ~Potl ~~ (eQf1 $1 dded to the a proved funding in FY15-17 to maintain core transportation I tofund significantly more costly rehabi I a on wor 5 million added in FY19 and FY20 to this ongoing level of effort project The additional f ent the need for more costly roa r ich is about five times more expensive and will addre lcant deterioration in the condition of many residential or rural roads Increase cos tional $ I Ion in FY14 supplementals Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily
traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair cost as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCl) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The latest 2013 survey indicated that the current cost of the countywide backJog on road repairs is $2111 million This represents 58 percent of total residential infrastructure pavement repair needs Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle
Other The design and planning stages as well as project construction will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (MSHTO) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) RuraVresidential road mileage has been adjusted to confonn with the State inventory of road mileage maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA) This inventory is updated annually Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 on residential and rural roads Related CiP projects include Pennanent Patching ResidentiaVRural Roads (501106) and Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary CommiSSion Washington Gas Light Company PEPCO Cable TV Verizon I United States Post Office
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
George Leventhal President Page 2 January 152015
The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because (1) the project offers the opportunity to achieve significant savings (2) the project supports significant economic development initiatives and (3) the project offers a significant opportunity that will be lost ifnot taken at this time
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$9505000 and specify the source of funds as White Flint - Special Tax District
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILnm
Attachment Amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 15-S15-CMCG-9
cc AI Roshdie~ Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
Resolution -------- shyhWrod~ ______________ Adopted _______
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY~MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 15-S15-CMCG-9 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTnmsportation White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) $9505~000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulatio~ or one that is approved after January I ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriati~ and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds White Flint West 501506 SIampU $5011000 White Flint shyWorkaround Construction $4494000 Special Tax District
TOTAL $9505000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 1S-SlS-CMCG-9 Page Two
4 This appropriation is needed because the contract for the Conference Center parking garage will be executed in FY15 Segments ofMain StreetIMarlret Street and Executive Boulevard Extended within the Conference Center property will be constructed by the Conference Centerparking garage contractor A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was signed between the Maryland Stadium Authority (MSA) and DOT in the spring 2014 The MOA is for construction ofa portion ofthe White Flint West Workaround roadwork to be included in MSA conference center parlcing garage design build procurement This arrangement will allow the County to take advantage ofeconomies of scale and reduce potential conflicts Based on the MSA schedule for the conference center parking garage expenditures and funding will need to be advanced and the appropriation ofConstruction funding for the roadway portion will need to be advanced to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $9505000 for White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) and specifies that the source of funds will be White Flint - Special Tax District
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds White Flint West 501506 SIampU $5011000 White Flint shyWorkaround Construction $4494000 Special Tax District
TOTAL $9505000
Ibis is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
White Flint West Workaround (P501506)
1IS15 categClly Tnmsportaionmiddot Date Last Modified 4ItfI14 Sub CateIJOlY Roads RequIred AdequaIe Pub6c Facility No Administering AgenoJ Transportation (AAGE3O) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Norlll Belhesda-Garlef1 Park SIaIus FITIIII Design Stage
6421
600
Site 1m and UtiIIes 25423
Construction 2945
0
Total
Tax District
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total 7
Data FIrst
FY15 First Cost Estimate
CUlIeI1t ~ FY15 62689 last FYs Cost EstimaIa 0
o o
Unencumbered Balance o
DesCription This project provides for land acquisition site improvements and utility (SIampU) relocations construction management and construction for one new road one new bikeway one relocated road and an intersection realignment improvement in the White Flint District area for Stage 1 Various improvements to the roads will include new traffic lanes shared-wgte paths undergrounding of overhead utility lines where required other utility relocations and streetscaping Preliminary and final engineering were funded through FY14 by White Flint District West Transportation (CIP 5(1116) The proposed projects for construction are 1Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new two-lane 1200-foot roadway 2Main StreetMarket Street (lB-1) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new 1200-f00t bikeway 3Executive Boulevard Extended (8-15) - Marine Road to Old Georgetown Road (MD1B7) - 900 feet of relocated four-lane roadway 41ntersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard including the approaches to Old Georgetown Road and the portion of Hoya Street from the intersection realignment of Hoya StreetOld Georgetown RoadlExecutive Boulevard to a point just north of the intersection to provide access to new development 5 Hoya Street (M-4A) - Montrose Parkway to the intersection of Old Georgetown Road - 1100 feet of reconstructed 4-Iane roadway
Estimated Schedule IS if +fttl h 1 Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Design in FY14through FY15 SIampU in FYi6through FY18 and construction in FYjalIdFV18 2 Main StreetIMarket Street (LB-1) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU in FY~rough FY1B and construction in FY-WaItfFY18 3 Executive Boulevard Extended (B-15) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU ana construction in FY16 through FY20 1( fflrtgtVlt h 4 Intersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY1B and construction in FY17 through FY19 5 Hoya Street (U-4A) - Design in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY18 and construction in FY17 through FY18 The schedule assumes that all land needed for road construction will be dedicated by the major developers in a timely manner The schedule also assumes the construction of conference center replacement parking will take place prior to the start of the roadway construction
Justification The vision for the White Flint District is for a more urban core with a walkable street grid sidewalks bikeways trans paths public use space parks and recreational facirlties mixed-use development and enhanced streetscape to improve the areas for pedestrian circulation and transit oriented development around the Metro station These road improvements along with other District roads proposed to be constructed by developers will fulfill the strategic program plan for a more etfactive and efficient transportation system The proposed improvements are in conformance with the White Flint Sector Plan Resolution 16-1300 adopted March 23 2010 Fiscal Note
Other The segments ofMain S1reetMarket Street and Executive Boulevard Extended that are adjacent to the (nf-- iPntP1 cit~ wilt h~ (ndn](~tfJd hv the contrac1nr oftne CnnfplPnlP (pont -p ln (__ n-
White ~lint West Workaround (P501506)
The uttimate funding source for these projecfs will be VVhite Flint Special Taxing District ~ revenues and related special obUgation bond issues Debt service on the special obligation bond issues WIll be paid solely from VVhite Flint Special Taxing District revenues Resolution No 16-1570 states that The Countys goal is that the VVhite Flint Special Taxing District special tax rate must not exceed len percent of the totaI1ax rate for the District except that the rate must be sufficient to pay debt service on any bonds that are already outstanding- If VVhite Flint Special Tax District revenues are not sufficient to fund these projects then the County will utiIize forward funcfmg advance funding and management ofdebt insurance or 19payment in a manner to oomply with the goal A pubDCgtprillate partnership Wll be considered to expecflie this project Disclosures A pedestrian impact analysis has been oompleted for this project
Coordination Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Washington Area Metropofllan Transit AuIhority City of Rockville State ~flghway Administration Town of Garrett Park Neighborhood Civic Associations DevelopeB
OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
Janwuy 152015
TO GeoIge Leven1hal President Countypi~___ FROM Isiah Leggett County Executive I~-
SUBJECT Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital ImprovJe~ ~gram and Supplemental Appropriation I2-SIS-CMCG-6 to the FYIS Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYIS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S I5-CMCG-6
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department of Transportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office of Management and Budget
montgomerycountymdgov311 _~__ 240-773-3556 TrY
--------Resolution fu~ ____________~
Adopred _______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 to the FYl5 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacmg ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
Background
1 Section 307 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County o~ or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may ina single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote of no fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residential Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 Page Two
4 This ~pp1ementa1 is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also J1e1p avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residentiall Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk of the Council
Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (P500511)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Highway Maintenance Requirad Adequate Public FaclJlty No Administeling Agency Transportation AAGE30 ReJocafion Impact None Planning Area Countywide status Ongoing
Total Thru FY13 EstFY14
Total 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Beyond 6 YI$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($OOOs) flU 1 nl
Planninc Desion and Supervision 9956 58 1423 8475 l1ifl~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ 0
Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Improvements and utirrties 0 0 0 0 0 LIIO d L IJ ~IO ~tuO qato 0
Construction 105663 bull 49574 8064 48025 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Other 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ~ 49amp77 9487 astib aiJt~ fiJ~ JI~i~ IJl1oieIt 17lampee D lIa qEt FUNONGS~ E ($ODDs
Current Revenue General 309 309 0 0 0 u AIISl J) 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 113738 41751 9481 58500 ~ale~fle 7mltl ~ ~ rO)
~ v
i58O IltI~
0
PAYGO 1617 1617 0 0 0 o bull o o r 0 I r 0 0
Total ~ 49677 9487 ~I~O Jil~ IIHe YMte-11 Meo I~ 0
II qur APPROPRIATION AND ~~~~RE DATA ODDs
IDate Flrst Appropriation FY 05 Flrst Cost Estimate I Current Scope FY 15 llaqflt~ Last FYs Cost Estimate 74866 Partial Closeout Thru 0 iNew Partial Closeout 0 IToml Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for the pennanent patching and resurfacing of rural and residential roadways using durable hot mix asphalt to restore long-tenn structural integrity to the aging rural and residential roadway infrastructure The County maintains a combined total of 4210 lane miles of rural and residential roads Preventative maintenance inciudes full-depth patching of distressed areas of pavement in combination with a new hot mix asphalt wearing surface of 1-inch to 2-inches depending on the levels of observed distress A portion of this work will be perfonned by the county in-house paving crew
Cost Change R~2ctf (Qllheq-o of ~oortlQlI~QtI~f4A)J ~9- ~Potl ~~ (eQf1 $1 dded to the a proved funding in FY15-17 to maintain core transportation I tofund significantly more costly rehabi I a on wor 5 million added in FY19 and FY20 to this ongoing level of effort project The additional f ent the need for more costly roa r ich is about five times more expensive and will addre lcant deterioration in the condition of many residential or rural roads Increase cos tional $ I Ion in FY14 supplementals Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily
traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair cost as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCl) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The latest 2013 survey indicated that the current cost of the countywide backJog on road repairs is $2111 million This represents 58 percent of total residential infrastructure pavement repair needs Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle
Other The design and planning stages as well as project construction will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (MSHTO) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) RuraVresidential road mileage has been adjusted to confonn with the State inventory of road mileage maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA) This inventory is updated annually Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 on residential and rural roads Related CiP projects include Pennanent Patching ResidentiaVRural Roads (501106) and Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary CommiSSion Washington Gas Light Company PEPCO Cable TV Verizon I United States Post Office
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
Resolution -------- shyhWrod~ ______________ Adopted _______
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY~MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 15-S15-CMCG-9 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTnmsportation White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) $9505~000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulatio~ or one that is approved after January I ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriati~ and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds White Flint West 501506 SIampU $5011000 White Flint shyWorkaround Construction $4494000 Special Tax District
TOTAL $9505000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 1S-SlS-CMCG-9 Page Two
4 This appropriation is needed because the contract for the Conference Center parking garage will be executed in FY15 Segments ofMain StreetIMarlret Street and Executive Boulevard Extended within the Conference Center property will be constructed by the Conference Centerparking garage contractor A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was signed between the Maryland Stadium Authority (MSA) and DOT in the spring 2014 The MOA is for construction ofa portion ofthe White Flint West Workaround roadwork to be included in MSA conference center parlcing garage design build procurement This arrangement will allow the County to take advantage ofeconomies of scale and reduce potential conflicts Based on the MSA schedule for the conference center parking garage expenditures and funding will need to be advanced and the appropriation ofConstruction funding for the roadway portion will need to be advanced to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $9505000 for White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) and specifies that the source of funds will be White Flint - Special Tax District
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds White Flint West 501506 SIampU $5011000 White Flint shyWorkaround Construction $4494000 Special Tax District
TOTAL $9505000
Ibis is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
White Flint West Workaround (P501506)
1IS15 categClly Tnmsportaionmiddot Date Last Modified 4ItfI14 Sub CateIJOlY Roads RequIred AdequaIe Pub6c Facility No Administering AgenoJ Transportation (AAGE3O) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Norlll Belhesda-Garlef1 Park SIaIus FITIIII Design Stage
6421
600
Site 1m and UtiIIes 25423
Construction 2945
0
Total
Tax District
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total 7
Data FIrst
FY15 First Cost Estimate
CUlIeI1t ~ FY15 62689 last FYs Cost EstimaIa 0
o o
Unencumbered Balance o
DesCription This project provides for land acquisition site improvements and utility (SIampU) relocations construction management and construction for one new road one new bikeway one relocated road and an intersection realignment improvement in the White Flint District area for Stage 1 Various improvements to the roads will include new traffic lanes shared-wgte paths undergrounding of overhead utility lines where required other utility relocations and streetscaping Preliminary and final engineering were funded through FY14 by White Flint District West Transportation (CIP 5(1116) The proposed projects for construction are 1Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new two-lane 1200-foot roadway 2Main StreetMarket Street (lB-1) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new 1200-f00t bikeway 3Executive Boulevard Extended (8-15) - Marine Road to Old Georgetown Road (MD1B7) - 900 feet of relocated four-lane roadway 41ntersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard including the approaches to Old Georgetown Road and the portion of Hoya Street from the intersection realignment of Hoya StreetOld Georgetown RoadlExecutive Boulevard to a point just north of the intersection to provide access to new development 5 Hoya Street (M-4A) - Montrose Parkway to the intersection of Old Georgetown Road - 1100 feet of reconstructed 4-Iane roadway
Estimated Schedule IS if +fttl h 1 Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Design in FY14through FY15 SIampU in FYi6through FY18 and construction in FYjalIdFV18 2 Main StreetIMarket Street (LB-1) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU in FY~rough FY1B and construction in FY-WaItfFY18 3 Executive Boulevard Extended (B-15) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU ana construction in FY16 through FY20 1( fflrtgtVlt h 4 Intersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY1B and construction in FY17 through FY19 5 Hoya Street (U-4A) - Design in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY18 and construction in FY17 through FY18 The schedule assumes that all land needed for road construction will be dedicated by the major developers in a timely manner The schedule also assumes the construction of conference center replacement parking will take place prior to the start of the roadway construction
Justification The vision for the White Flint District is for a more urban core with a walkable street grid sidewalks bikeways trans paths public use space parks and recreational facirlties mixed-use development and enhanced streetscape to improve the areas for pedestrian circulation and transit oriented development around the Metro station These road improvements along with other District roads proposed to be constructed by developers will fulfill the strategic program plan for a more etfactive and efficient transportation system The proposed improvements are in conformance with the White Flint Sector Plan Resolution 16-1300 adopted March 23 2010 Fiscal Note
Other The segments ofMain S1reetMarket Street and Executive Boulevard Extended that are adjacent to the (nf-- iPntP1 cit~ wilt h~ (ndn](~tfJd hv the contrac1nr oftne CnnfplPnlP (pont -p ln (__ n-
White ~lint West Workaround (P501506)
The uttimate funding source for these projecfs will be VVhite Flint Special Taxing District ~ revenues and related special obUgation bond issues Debt service on the special obligation bond issues WIll be paid solely from VVhite Flint Special Taxing District revenues Resolution No 16-1570 states that The Countys goal is that the VVhite Flint Special Taxing District special tax rate must not exceed len percent of the totaI1ax rate for the District except that the rate must be sufficient to pay debt service on any bonds that are already outstanding- If VVhite Flint Special Tax District revenues are not sufficient to fund these projects then the County will utiIize forward funcfmg advance funding and management ofdebt insurance or 19payment in a manner to oomply with the goal A pubDCgtprillate partnership Wll be considered to expecflie this project Disclosures A pedestrian impact analysis has been oompleted for this project
Coordination Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Washington Area Metropofllan Transit AuIhority City of Rockville State ~flghway Administration Town of Garrett Park Neighborhood Civic Associations DevelopeB
OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
Janwuy 152015
TO GeoIge Leven1hal President Countypi~___ FROM Isiah Leggett County Executive I~-
SUBJECT Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital ImprovJe~ ~gram and Supplemental Appropriation I2-SIS-CMCG-6 to the FYIS Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYIS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S I5-CMCG-6
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department of Transportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office of Management and Budget
montgomerycountymdgov311 _~__ 240-773-3556 TrY
--------Resolution fu~ ____________~
Adopred _______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 to the FYl5 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacmg ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
Background
1 Section 307 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County o~ or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may ina single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote of no fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residential Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 Page Two
4 This ~pp1ementa1 is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also J1e1p avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residentiall Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk of the Council
Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (P500511)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Highway Maintenance Requirad Adequate Public FaclJlty No Administeling Agency Transportation AAGE30 ReJocafion Impact None Planning Area Countywide status Ongoing
Total Thru FY13 EstFY14
Total 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Beyond 6 YI$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($OOOs) flU 1 nl
Planninc Desion and Supervision 9956 58 1423 8475 l1ifl~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ 0
Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Improvements and utirrties 0 0 0 0 0 LIIO d L IJ ~IO ~tuO qato 0
Construction 105663 bull 49574 8064 48025 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Other 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ~ 49amp77 9487 astib aiJt~ fiJ~ JI~i~ IJl1oieIt 17lampee D lIa qEt FUNONGS~ E ($ODDs
Current Revenue General 309 309 0 0 0 u AIISl J) 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 113738 41751 9481 58500 ~ale~fle 7mltl ~ ~ rO)
~ v
i58O IltI~
0
PAYGO 1617 1617 0 0 0 o bull o o r 0 I r 0 0
Total ~ 49677 9487 ~I~O Jil~ IIHe YMte-11 Meo I~ 0
II qur APPROPRIATION AND ~~~~RE DATA ODDs
IDate Flrst Appropriation FY 05 Flrst Cost Estimate I Current Scope FY 15 llaqflt~ Last FYs Cost Estimate 74866 Partial Closeout Thru 0 iNew Partial Closeout 0 IToml Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for the pennanent patching and resurfacing of rural and residential roadways using durable hot mix asphalt to restore long-tenn structural integrity to the aging rural and residential roadway infrastructure The County maintains a combined total of 4210 lane miles of rural and residential roads Preventative maintenance inciudes full-depth patching of distressed areas of pavement in combination with a new hot mix asphalt wearing surface of 1-inch to 2-inches depending on the levels of observed distress A portion of this work will be perfonned by the county in-house paving crew
Cost Change R~2ctf (Qllheq-o of ~oortlQlI~QtI~f4A)J ~9- ~Potl ~~ (eQf1 $1 dded to the a proved funding in FY15-17 to maintain core transportation I tofund significantly more costly rehabi I a on wor 5 million added in FY19 and FY20 to this ongoing level of effort project The additional f ent the need for more costly roa r ich is about five times more expensive and will addre lcant deterioration in the condition of many residential or rural roads Increase cos tional $ I Ion in FY14 supplementals Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily
traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair cost as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCl) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The latest 2013 survey indicated that the current cost of the countywide backJog on road repairs is $2111 million This represents 58 percent of total residential infrastructure pavement repair needs Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle
Other The design and planning stages as well as project construction will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (MSHTO) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) RuraVresidential road mileage has been adjusted to confonn with the State inventory of road mileage maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA) This inventory is updated annually Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 on residential and rural roads Related CiP projects include Pennanent Patching ResidentiaVRural Roads (501106) and Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary CommiSSion Washington Gas Light Company PEPCO Cable TV Verizon I United States Post Office
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 1S-SlS-CMCG-9 Page Two
4 This appropriation is needed because the contract for the Conference Center parking garage will be executed in FY15 Segments ofMain StreetIMarlret Street and Executive Boulevard Extended within the Conference Center property will be constructed by the Conference Centerparking garage contractor A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was signed between the Maryland Stadium Authority (MSA) and DOT in the spring 2014 The MOA is for construction ofa portion ofthe White Flint West Workaround roadwork to be included in MSA conference center parlcing garage design build procurement This arrangement will allow the County to take advantage ofeconomies of scale and reduce potential conflicts Based on the MSA schedule for the conference center parking garage expenditures and funding will need to be advanced and the appropriation ofConstruction funding for the roadway portion will need to be advanced to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $9505000 for White Flint West Workaround (No 501506) and specifies that the source of funds will be White Flint - Special Tax District
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds White Flint West 501506 SIampU $5011000 White Flint shyWorkaround Construction $4494000 Special Tax District
TOTAL $9505000
Ibis is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
White Flint West Workaround (P501506)
1IS15 categClly Tnmsportaionmiddot Date Last Modified 4ItfI14 Sub CateIJOlY Roads RequIred AdequaIe Pub6c Facility No Administering AgenoJ Transportation (AAGE3O) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Norlll Belhesda-Garlef1 Park SIaIus FITIIII Design Stage
6421
600
Site 1m and UtiIIes 25423
Construction 2945
0
Total
Tax District
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total 7
Data FIrst
FY15 First Cost Estimate
CUlIeI1t ~ FY15 62689 last FYs Cost EstimaIa 0
o o
Unencumbered Balance o
DesCription This project provides for land acquisition site improvements and utility (SIampU) relocations construction management and construction for one new road one new bikeway one relocated road and an intersection realignment improvement in the White Flint District area for Stage 1 Various improvements to the roads will include new traffic lanes shared-wgte paths undergrounding of overhead utility lines where required other utility relocations and streetscaping Preliminary and final engineering were funded through FY14 by White Flint District West Transportation (CIP 5(1116) The proposed projects for construction are 1Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new two-lane 1200-foot roadway 2Main StreetMarket Street (lB-1) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new 1200-f00t bikeway 3Executive Boulevard Extended (8-15) - Marine Road to Old Georgetown Road (MD1B7) - 900 feet of relocated four-lane roadway 41ntersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard including the approaches to Old Georgetown Road and the portion of Hoya Street from the intersection realignment of Hoya StreetOld Georgetown RoadlExecutive Boulevard to a point just north of the intersection to provide access to new development 5 Hoya Street (M-4A) - Montrose Parkway to the intersection of Old Georgetown Road - 1100 feet of reconstructed 4-Iane roadway
Estimated Schedule IS if +fttl h 1 Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Design in FY14through FY15 SIampU in FYi6through FY18 and construction in FYjalIdFV18 2 Main StreetIMarket Street (LB-1) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU in FY~rough FY1B and construction in FY-WaItfFY18 3 Executive Boulevard Extended (B-15) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU ana construction in FY16 through FY20 1( fflrtgtVlt h 4 Intersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY1B and construction in FY17 through FY19 5 Hoya Street (U-4A) - Design in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY18 and construction in FY17 through FY18 The schedule assumes that all land needed for road construction will be dedicated by the major developers in a timely manner The schedule also assumes the construction of conference center replacement parking will take place prior to the start of the roadway construction
Justification The vision for the White Flint District is for a more urban core with a walkable street grid sidewalks bikeways trans paths public use space parks and recreational facirlties mixed-use development and enhanced streetscape to improve the areas for pedestrian circulation and transit oriented development around the Metro station These road improvements along with other District roads proposed to be constructed by developers will fulfill the strategic program plan for a more etfactive and efficient transportation system The proposed improvements are in conformance with the White Flint Sector Plan Resolution 16-1300 adopted March 23 2010 Fiscal Note
Other The segments ofMain S1reetMarket Street and Executive Boulevard Extended that are adjacent to the (nf-- iPntP1 cit~ wilt h~ (ndn](~tfJd hv the contrac1nr oftne CnnfplPnlP (pont -p ln (__ n-
White ~lint West Workaround (P501506)
The uttimate funding source for these projecfs will be VVhite Flint Special Taxing District ~ revenues and related special obUgation bond issues Debt service on the special obligation bond issues WIll be paid solely from VVhite Flint Special Taxing District revenues Resolution No 16-1570 states that The Countys goal is that the VVhite Flint Special Taxing District special tax rate must not exceed len percent of the totaI1ax rate for the District except that the rate must be sufficient to pay debt service on any bonds that are already outstanding- If VVhite Flint Special Tax District revenues are not sufficient to fund these projects then the County will utiIize forward funcfmg advance funding and management ofdebt insurance or 19payment in a manner to oomply with the goal A pubDCgtprillate partnership Wll be considered to expecflie this project Disclosures A pedestrian impact analysis has been oompleted for this project
Coordination Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Washington Area Metropofllan Transit AuIhority City of Rockville State ~flghway Administration Town of Garrett Park Neighborhood Civic Associations DevelopeB
OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
Janwuy 152015
TO GeoIge Leven1hal President Countypi~___ FROM Isiah Leggett County Executive I~-
SUBJECT Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital ImprovJe~ ~gram and Supplemental Appropriation I2-SIS-CMCG-6 to the FYIS Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYIS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S I5-CMCG-6
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department of Transportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office of Management and Budget
montgomerycountymdgov311 _~__ 240-773-3556 TrY
--------Resolution fu~ ____________~
Adopred _______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 to the FYl5 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacmg ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
Background
1 Section 307 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County o~ or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may ina single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote of no fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residential Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 Page Two
4 This ~pp1ementa1 is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also J1e1p avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residentiall Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk of the Council
Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (P500511)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Highway Maintenance Requirad Adequate Public FaclJlty No Administeling Agency Transportation AAGE30 ReJocafion Impact None Planning Area Countywide status Ongoing
Total Thru FY13 EstFY14
Total 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Beyond 6 YI$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($OOOs) flU 1 nl
Planninc Desion and Supervision 9956 58 1423 8475 l1ifl~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ 0
Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Improvements and utirrties 0 0 0 0 0 LIIO d L IJ ~IO ~tuO qato 0
Construction 105663 bull 49574 8064 48025 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Other 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ~ 49amp77 9487 astib aiJt~ fiJ~ JI~i~ IJl1oieIt 17lampee D lIa qEt FUNONGS~ E ($ODDs
Current Revenue General 309 309 0 0 0 u AIISl J) 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 113738 41751 9481 58500 ~ale~fle 7mltl ~ ~ rO)
~ v
i58O IltI~
0
PAYGO 1617 1617 0 0 0 o bull o o r 0 I r 0 0
Total ~ 49677 9487 ~I~O Jil~ IIHe YMte-11 Meo I~ 0
II qur APPROPRIATION AND ~~~~RE DATA ODDs
IDate Flrst Appropriation FY 05 Flrst Cost Estimate I Current Scope FY 15 llaqflt~ Last FYs Cost Estimate 74866 Partial Closeout Thru 0 iNew Partial Closeout 0 IToml Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for the pennanent patching and resurfacing of rural and residential roadways using durable hot mix asphalt to restore long-tenn structural integrity to the aging rural and residential roadway infrastructure The County maintains a combined total of 4210 lane miles of rural and residential roads Preventative maintenance inciudes full-depth patching of distressed areas of pavement in combination with a new hot mix asphalt wearing surface of 1-inch to 2-inches depending on the levels of observed distress A portion of this work will be perfonned by the county in-house paving crew
Cost Change R~2ctf (Qllheq-o of ~oortlQlI~QtI~f4A)J ~9- ~Potl ~~ (eQf1 $1 dded to the a proved funding in FY15-17 to maintain core transportation I tofund significantly more costly rehabi I a on wor 5 million added in FY19 and FY20 to this ongoing level of effort project The additional f ent the need for more costly roa r ich is about five times more expensive and will addre lcant deterioration in the condition of many residential or rural roads Increase cos tional $ I Ion in FY14 supplementals Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily
traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair cost as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCl) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The latest 2013 survey indicated that the current cost of the countywide backJog on road repairs is $2111 million This represents 58 percent of total residential infrastructure pavement repair needs Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle
Other The design and planning stages as well as project construction will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (MSHTO) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) RuraVresidential road mileage has been adjusted to confonn with the State inventory of road mileage maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA) This inventory is updated annually Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 on residential and rural roads Related CiP projects include Pennanent Patching ResidentiaVRural Roads (501106) and Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary CommiSSion Washington Gas Light Company PEPCO Cable TV Verizon I United States Post Office
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
White Flint West Workaround (P501506)
1IS15 categClly Tnmsportaionmiddot Date Last Modified 4ItfI14 Sub CateIJOlY Roads RequIred AdequaIe Pub6c Facility No Administering AgenoJ Transportation (AAGE3O) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Norlll Belhesda-Garlef1 Park SIaIus FITIIII Design Stage
6421
600
Site 1m and UtiIIes 25423
Construction 2945
0
Total
Tax District
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total 7
Data FIrst
FY15 First Cost Estimate
CUlIeI1t ~ FY15 62689 last FYs Cost EstimaIa 0
o o
Unencumbered Balance o
DesCription This project provides for land acquisition site improvements and utility (SIampU) relocations construction management and construction for one new road one new bikeway one relocated road and an intersection realignment improvement in the White Flint District area for Stage 1 Various improvements to the roads will include new traffic lanes shared-wgte paths undergrounding of overhead utility lines where required other utility relocations and streetscaping Preliminary and final engineering were funded through FY14 by White Flint District West Transportation (CIP 5(1116) The proposed projects for construction are 1Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new two-lane 1200-foot roadway 2Main StreetMarket Street (lB-1) - Old Georgetown Road (MD187) to Woodglen Drive - new 1200-f00t bikeway 3Executive Boulevard Extended (8-15) - Marine Road to Old Georgetown Road (MD1B7) - 900 feet of relocated four-lane roadway 41ntersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard including the approaches to Old Georgetown Road and the portion of Hoya Street from the intersection realignment of Hoya StreetOld Georgetown RoadlExecutive Boulevard to a point just north of the intersection to provide access to new development 5 Hoya Street (M-4A) - Montrose Parkway to the intersection of Old Georgetown Road - 1100 feet of reconstructed 4-Iane roadway
Estimated Schedule IS if +fttl h 1 Main StreetMarket Street (8-10) - Design in FY14through FY15 SIampU in FYi6through FY18 and construction in FYjalIdFV18 2 Main StreetIMarket Street (LB-1) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU in FY~rough FY1B and construction in FY-WaItfFY18 3 Executive Boulevard Extended (B-15) - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 SIampU ana construction in FY16 through FY20 1( fflrtgtVlt h 4 Intersection of Hoya Street (formerly Old Old Georgetown Road) (M-4A) Old Georgetown Road and Executive Boulevard - Oesign in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY1B and construction in FY17 through FY19 5 Hoya Street (U-4A) - Design in FY14 through FY15 land acquisition in FY16 SIampU in FY16 through FY18 and construction in FY17 through FY18 The schedule assumes that all land needed for road construction will be dedicated by the major developers in a timely manner The schedule also assumes the construction of conference center replacement parking will take place prior to the start of the roadway construction
Justification The vision for the White Flint District is for a more urban core with a walkable street grid sidewalks bikeways trans paths public use space parks and recreational facirlties mixed-use development and enhanced streetscape to improve the areas for pedestrian circulation and transit oriented development around the Metro station These road improvements along with other District roads proposed to be constructed by developers will fulfill the strategic program plan for a more etfactive and efficient transportation system The proposed improvements are in conformance with the White Flint Sector Plan Resolution 16-1300 adopted March 23 2010 Fiscal Note
Other The segments ofMain S1reetMarket Street and Executive Boulevard Extended that are adjacent to the (nf-- iPntP1 cit~ wilt h~ (ndn](~tfJd hv the contrac1nr oftne CnnfplPnlP (pont -p ln (__ n-
White ~lint West Workaround (P501506)
The uttimate funding source for these projecfs will be VVhite Flint Special Taxing District ~ revenues and related special obUgation bond issues Debt service on the special obligation bond issues WIll be paid solely from VVhite Flint Special Taxing District revenues Resolution No 16-1570 states that The Countys goal is that the VVhite Flint Special Taxing District special tax rate must not exceed len percent of the totaI1ax rate for the District except that the rate must be sufficient to pay debt service on any bonds that are already outstanding- If VVhite Flint Special Tax District revenues are not sufficient to fund these projects then the County will utiIize forward funcfmg advance funding and management ofdebt insurance or 19payment in a manner to oomply with the goal A pubDCgtprillate partnership Wll be considered to expecflie this project Disclosures A pedestrian impact analysis has been oompleted for this project
Coordination Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Washington Area Metropofllan Transit AuIhority City of Rockville State ~flghway Administration Town of Garrett Park Neighborhood Civic Associations DevelopeB
OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
Janwuy 152015
TO GeoIge Leven1hal President Countypi~___ FROM Isiah Leggett County Executive I~-
SUBJECT Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital ImprovJe~ ~gram and Supplemental Appropriation I2-SIS-CMCG-6 to the FYIS Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYIS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S I5-CMCG-6
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department of Transportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office of Management and Budget
montgomerycountymdgov311 _~__ 240-773-3556 TrY
--------Resolution fu~ ____________~
Adopred _______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 to the FYl5 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacmg ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
Background
1 Section 307 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County o~ or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may ina single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote of no fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residential Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 Page Two
4 This ~pp1ementa1 is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also J1e1p avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residentiall Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk of the Council
Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (P500511)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Highway Maintenance Requirad Adequate Public FaclJlty No Administeling Agency Transportation AAGE30 ReJocafion Impact None Planning Area Countywide status Ongoing
Total Thru FY13 EstFY14
Total 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Beyond 6 YI$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($OOOs) flU 1 nl
Planninc Desion and Supervision 9956 58 1423 8475 l1ifl~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ 0
Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Improvements and utirrties 0 0 0 0 0 LIIO d L IJ ~IO ~tuO qato 0
Construction 105663 bull 49574 8064 48025 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Other 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ~ 49amp77 9487 astib aiJt~ fiJ~ JI~i~ IJl1oieIt 17lampee D lIa qEt FUNONGS~ E ($ODDs
Current Revenue General 309 309 0 0 0 u AIISl J) 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 113738 41751 9481 58500 ~ale~fle 7mltl ~ ~ rO)
~ v
i58O IltI~
0
PAYGO 1617 1617 0 0 0 o bull o o r 0 I r 0 0
Total ~ 49677 9487 ~I~O Jil~ IIHe YMte-11 Meo I~ 0
II qur APPROPRIATION AND ~~~~RE DATA ODDs
IDate Flrst Appropriation FY 05 Flrst Cost Estimate I Current Scope FY 15 llaqflt~ Last FYs Cost Estimate 74866 Partial Closeout Thru 0 iNew Partial Closeout 0 IToml Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for the pennanent patching and resurfacing of rural and residential roadways using durable hot mix asphalt to restore long-tenn structural integrity to the aging rural and residential roadway infrastructure The County maintains a combined total of 4210 lane miles of rural and residential roads Preventative maintenance inciudes full-depth patching of distressed areas of pavement in combination with a new hot mix asphalt wearing surface of 1-inch to 2-inches depending on the levels of observed distress A portion of this work will be perfonned by the county in-house paving crew
Cost Change R~2ctf (Qllheq-o of ~oortlQlI~QtI~f4A)J ~9- ~Potl ~~ (eQf1 $1 dded to the a proved funding in FY15-17 to maintain core transportation I tofund significantly more costly rehabi I a on wor 5 million added in FY19 and FY20 to this ongoing level of effort project The additional f ent the need for more costly roa r ich is about five times more expensive and will addre lcant deterioration in the condition of many residential or rural roads Increase cos tional $ I Ion in FY14 supplementals Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily
traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair cost as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCl) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The latest 2013 survey indicated that the current cost of the countywide backJog on road repairs is $2111 million This represents 58 percent of total residential infrastructure pavement repair needs Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle
Other The design and planning stages as well as project construction will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (MSHTO) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) RuraVresidential road mileage has been adjusted to confonn with the State inventory of road mileage maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA) This inventory is updated annually Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 on residential and rural roads Related CiP projects include Pennanent Patching ResidentiaVRural Roads (501106) and Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary CommiSSion Washington Gas Light Company PEPCO Cable TV Verizon I United States Post Office
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
White ~lint West Workaround (P501506)
The uttimate funding source for these projecfs will be VVhite Flint Special Taxing District ~ revenues and related special obUgation bond issues Debt service on the special obligation bond issues WIll be paid solely from VVhite Flint Special Taxing District revenues Resolution No 16-1570 states that The Countys goal is that the VVhite Flint Special Taxing District special tax rate must not exceed len percent of the totaI1ax rate for the District except that the rate must be sufficient to pay debt service on any bonds that are already outstanding- If VVhite Flint Special Tax District revenues are not sufficient to fund these projects then the County will utiIize forward funcfmg advance funding and management ofdebt insurance or 19payment in a manner to oomply with the goal A pubDCgtprillate partnership Wll be considered to expecflie this project Disclosures A pedestrian impact analysis has been oompleted for this project
Coordination Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Washington Area Metropofllan Transit AuIhority City of Rockville State ~flghway Administration Town of Garrett Park Neighborhood Civic Associations DevelopeB
OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
Janwuy 152015
TO GeoIge Leven1hal President Countypi~___ FROM Isiah Leggett County Executive I~-
SUBJECT Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital ImprovJe~ ~gram and Supplemental Appropriation I2-SIS-CMCG-6 to the FYIS Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYIS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S I5-CMCG-6
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department of Transportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office of Management and Budget
montgomerycountymdgov311 _~__ 240-773-3556 TrY
--------Resolution fu~ ____________~
Adopred _______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 to the FYl5 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacmg ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
Background
1 Section 307 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County o~ or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may ina single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote of no fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residential Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 Page Two
4 This ~pp1ementa1 is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also J1e1p avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residentiall Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk of the Council
Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (P500511)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Highway Maintenance Requirad Adequate Public FaclJlty No Administeling Agency Transportation AAGE30 ReJocafion Impact None Planning Area Countywide status Ongoing
Total Thru FY13 EstFY14
Total 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Beyond 6 YI$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($OOOs) flU 1 nl
Planninc Desion and Supervision 9956 58 1423 8475 l1ifl~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ 0
Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Improvements and utirrties 0 0 0 0 0 LIIO d L IJ ~IO ~tuO qato 0
Construction 105663 bull 49574 8064 48025 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Other 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ~ 49amp77 9487 astib aiJt~ fiJ~ JI~i~ IJl1oieIt 17lampee D lIa qEt FUNONGS~ E ($ODDs
Current Revenue General 309 309 0 0 0 u AIISl J) 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 113738 41751 9481 58500 ~ale~fle 7mltl ~ ~ rO)
~ v
i58O IltI~
0
PAYGO 1617 1617 0 0 0 o bull o o r 0 I r 0 0
Total ~ 49677 9487 ~I~O Jil~ IIHe YMte-11 Meo I~ 0
II qur APPROPRIATION AND ~~~~RE DATA ODDs
IDate Flrst Appropriation FY 05 Flrst Cost Estimate I Current Scope FY 15 llaqflt~ Last FYs Cost Estimate 74866 Partial Closeout Thru 0 iNew Partial Closeout 0 IToml Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for the pennanent patching and resurfacing of rural and residential roadways using durable hot mix asphalt to restore long-tenn structural integrity to the aging rural and residential roadway infrastructure The County maintains a combined total of 4210 lane miles of rural and residential roads Preventative maintenance inciudes full-depth patching of distressed areas of pavement in combination with a new hot mix asphalt wearing surface of 1-inch to 2-inches depending on the levels of observed distress A portion of this work will be perfonned by the county in-house paving crew
Cost Change R~2ctf (Qllheq-o of ~oortlQlI~QtI~f4A)J ~9- ~Potl ~~ (eQf1 $1 dded to the a proved funding in FY15-17 to maintain core transportation I tofund significantly more costly rehabi I a on wor 5 million added in FY19 and FY20 to this ongoing level of effort project The additional f ent the need for more costly roa r ich is about five times more expensive and will addre lcant deterioration in the condition of many residential or rural roads Increase cos tional $ I Ion in FY14 supplementals Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily
traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair cost as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCl) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The latest 2013 survey indicated that the current cost of the countywide backJog on road repairs is $2111 million This represents 58 percent of total residential infrastructure pavement repair needs Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle
Other The design and planning stages as well as project construction will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (MSHTO) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) RuraVresidential road mileage has been adjusted to confonn with the State inventory of road mileage maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA) This inventory is updated annually Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 on residential and rural roads Related CiP projects include Pennanent Patching ResidentiaVRural Roads (501106) and Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary CommiSSion Washington Gas Light Company PEPCO Cable TV Verizon I United States Post Office
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
Janwuy 152015
TO GeoIge Leven1hal President Countypi~___ FROM Isiah Leggett County Executive I~-
SUBJECT Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital ImprovJe~ ~gram and Supplemental Appropriation I2-SIS-CMCG-6 to the FYIS Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYIS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3500000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S I5-CMCG-6
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department of Transportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office of Management and Budget
montgomerycountymdgov311 _~__ 240-773-3556 TrY
--------Resolution fu~ ____________~
Adopred _______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 to the FYl5 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacmg ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
Background
1 Section 307 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County o~ or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may ina single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote of no fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residential Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 Page Two
4 This ~pp1ementa1 is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also J1e1p avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residentiall Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk of the Council
Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (P500511)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Highway Maintenance Requirad Adequate Public FaclJlty No Administeling Agency Transportation AAGE30 ReJocafion Impact None Planning Area Countywide status Ongoing
Total Thru FY13 EstFY14
Total 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Beyond 6 YI$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($OOOs) flU 1 nl
Planninc Desion and Supervision 9956 58 1423 8475 l1ifl~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ 0
Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Improvements and utirrties 0 0 0 0 0 LIIO d L IJ ~IO ~tuO qato 0
Construction 105663 bull 49574 8064 48025 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Other 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ~ 49amp77 9487 astib aiJt~ fiJ~ JI~i~ IJl1oieIt 17lampee D lIa qEt FUNONGS~ E ($ODDs
Current Revenue General 309 309 0 0 0 u AIISl J) 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 113738 41751 9481 58500 ~ale~fle 7mltl ~ ~ rO)
~ v
i58O IltI~
0
PAYGO 1617 1617 0 0 0 o bull o o r 0 I r 0 0
Total ~ 49677 9487 ~I~O Jil~ IIHe YMte-11 Meo I~ 0
II qur APPROPRIATION AND ~~~~RE DATA ODDs
IDate Flrst Appropriation FY 05 Flrst Cost Estimate I Current Scope FY 15 llaqflt~ Last FYs Cost Estimate 74866 Partial Closeout Thru 0 iNew Partial Closeout 0 IToml Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for the pennanent patching and resurfacing of rural and residential roadways using durable hot mix asphalt to restore long-tenn structural integrity to the aging rural and residential roadway infrastructure The County maintains a combined total of 4210 lane miles of rural and residential roads Preventative maintenance inciudes full-depth patching of distressed areas of pavement in combination with a new hot mix asphalt wearing surface of 1-inch to 2-inches depending on the levels of observed distress A portion of this work will be perfonned by the county in-house paving crew
Cost Change R~2ctf (Qllheq-o of ~oortlQlI~QtI~f4A)J ~9- ~Potl ~~ (eQf1 $1 dded to the a proved funding in FY15-17 to maintain core transportation I tofund significantly more costly rehabi I a on wor 5 million added in FY19 and FY20 to this ongoing level of effort project The additional f ent the need for more costly roa r ich is about five times more expensive and will addre lcant deterioration in the condition of many residential or rural roads Increase cos tional $ I Ion in FY14 supplementals Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily
traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair cost as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCl) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The latest 2013 survey indicated that the current cost of the countywide backJog on road repairs is $2111 million This represents 58 percent of total residential infrastructure pavement repair needs Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle
Other The design and planning stages as well as project construction will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (MSHTO) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) RuraVresidential road mileage has been adjusted to confonn with the State inventory of road mileage maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA) This inventory is updated annually Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 on residential and rural roads Related CiP projects include Pennanent Patching ResidentiaVRural Roads (501106) and Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary CommiSSion Washington Gas Light Company PEPCO Cable TV Verizon I United States Post Office
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
--------Resolution fu~ ____________~
Adopred _______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 to the FYl5 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacmg ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) $3500000
Background
1 Section 307 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County o~ or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may ina single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 of the Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote of no fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residential Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
reg
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 Page Two
4 This ~pp1ementa1 is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also J1e1p avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residentiall Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk of the Council
Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (P500511)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Highway Maintenance Requirad Adequate Public FaclJlty No Administeling Agency Transportation AAGE30 ReJocafion Impact None Planning Area Countywide status Ongoing
Total Thru FY13 EstFY14
Total 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Beyond 6 YI$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($OOOs) flU 1 nl
Planninc Desion and Supervision 9956 58 1423 8475 l1ifl~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ 0
Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Improvements and utirrties 0 0 0 0 0 LIIO d L IJ ~IO ~tuO qato 0
Construction 105663 bull 49574 8064 48025 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Other 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ~ 49amp77 9487 astib aiJt~ fiJ~ JI~i~ IJl1oieIt 17lampee D lIa qEt FUNONGS~ E ($ODDs
Current Revenue General 309 309 0 0 0 u AIISl J) 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 113738 41751 9481 58500 ~ale~fle 7mltl ~ ~ rO)
~ v
i58O IltI~
0
PAYGO 1617 1617 0 0 0 o bull o o r 0 I r 0 0
Total ~ 49677 9487 ~I~O Jil~ IIHe YMte-11 Meo I~ 0
II qur APPROPRIATION AND ~~~~RE DATA ODDs
IDate Flrst Appropriation FY 05 Flrst Cost Estimate I Current Scope FY 15 llaqflt~ Last FYs Cost Estimate 74866 Partial Closeout Thru 0 iNew Partial Closeout 0 IToml Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for the pennanent patching and resurfacing of rural and residential roadways using durable hot mix asphalt to restore long-tenn structural integrity to the aging rural and residential roadway infrastructure The County maintains a combined total of 4210 lane miles of rural and residential roads Preventative maintenance inciudes full-depth patching of distressed areas of pavement in combination with a new hot mix asphalt wearing surface of 1-inch to 2-inches depending on the levels of observed distress A portion of this work will be perfonned by the county in-house paving crew
Cost Change R~2ctf (Qllheq-o of ~oortlQlI~QtI~f4A)J ~9- ~Potl ~~ (eQf1 $1 dded to the a proved funding in FY15-17 to maintain core transportation I tofund significantly more costly rehabi I a on wor 5 million added in FY19 and FY20 to this ongoing level of effort project The additional f ent the need for more costly roa r ich is about five times more expensive and will addre lcant deterioration in the condition of many residential or rural roads Increase cos tional $ I Ion in FY14 supplementals Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily
traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair cost as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCl) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The latest 2013 survey indicated that the current cost of the countywide backJog on road repairs is $2111 million This represents 58 percent of total residential infrastructure pavement repair needs Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle
Other The design and planning stages as well as project construction will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (MSHTO) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) RuraVresidential road mileage has been adjusted to confonn with the State inventory of road mileage maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA) This inventory is updated annually Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 on residential and rural roads Related CiP projects include Pennanent Patching ResidentiaVRural Roads (501106) and Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary CommiSSion Washington Gas Light Company PEPCO Cable TV Verizon I United States Post Office
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 12-S15-CMCG-6 Page Two
4 This ~pp1ementa1 is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also J1e1p avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 238 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$3500000 for Resurfacing ResidentiallRural Roads (No 500511) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing Residentiall Rural Roads 500511 PDS $525000 GO Bonds
Construction $2975000 GO Bonds TOTAL $3500000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk of the Council
Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (P500511)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Highway Maintenance Requirad Adequate Public FaclJlty No Administeling Agency Transportation AAGE30 ReJocafion Impact None Planning Area Countywide status Ongoing
Total Thru FY13 EstFY14
Total 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Beyond 6 YI$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($OOOs) flU 1 nl
Planninc Desion and Supervision 9956 58 1423 8475 l1ifl~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ 0
Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Improvements and utirrties 0 0 0 0 0 LIIO d L IJ ~IO ~tuO qato 0
Construction 105663 bull 49574 8064 48025 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Other 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ~ 49amp77 9487 astib aiJt~ fiJ~ JI~i~ IJl1oieIt 17lampee D lIa qEt FUNONGS~ E ($ODDs
Current Revenue General 309 309 0 0 0 u AIISl J) 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 113738 41751 9481 58500 ~ale~fle 7mltl ~ ~ rO)
~ v
i58O IltI~
0
PAYGO 1617 1617 0 0 0 o bull o o r 0 I r 0 0
Total ~ 49677 9487 ~I~O Jil~ IIHe YMte-11 Meo I~ 0
II qur APPROPRIATION AND ~~~~RE DATA ODDs
IDate Flrst Appropriation FY 05 Flrst Cost Estimate I Current Scope FY 15 llaqflt~ Last FYs Cost Estimate 74866 Partial Closeout Thru 0 iNew Partial Closeout 0 IToml Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for the pennanent patching and resurfacing of rural and residential roadways using durable hot mix asphalt to restore long-tenn structural integrity to the aging rural and residential roadway infrastructure The County maintains a combined total of 4210 lane miles of rural and residential roads Preventative maintenance inciudes full-depth patching of distressed areas of pavement in combination with a new hot mix asphalt wearing surface of 1-inch to 2-inches depending on the levels of observed distress A portion of this work will be perfonned by the county in-house paving crew
Cost Change R~2ctf (Qllheq-o of ~oortlQlI~QtI~f4A)J ~9- ~Potl ~~ (eQf1 $1 dded to the a proved funding in FY15-17 to maintain core transportation I tofund significantly more costly rehabi I a on wor 5 million added in FY19 and FY20 to this ongoing level of effort project The additional f ent the need for more costly roa r ich is about five times more expensive and will addre lcant deterioration in the condition of many residential or rural roads Increase cos tional $ I Ion in FY14 supplementals Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily
traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair cost as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCl) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The latest 2013 survey indicated that the current cost of the countywide backJog on road repairs is $2111 million This represents 58 percent of total residential infrastructure pavement repair needs Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle
Other The design and planning stages as well as project construction will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (MSHTO) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) RuraVresidential road mileage has been adjusted to confonn with the State inventory of road mileage maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA) This inventory is updated annually Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 on residential and rural roads Related CiP projects include Pennanent Patching ResidentiaVRural Roads (501106) and Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary CommiSSion Washington Gas Light Company PEPCO Cable TV Verizon I United States Post Office
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (P500511)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Highway Maintenance Requirad Adequate Public FaclJlty No Administeling Agency Transportation AAGE30 ReJocafion Impact None Planning Area Countywide status Ongoing
Total Thru FY13 EstFY14
Total 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Beyond 6 YI$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($OOOs) flU 1 nl
Planninc Desion and Supervision 9956 58 1423 8475 l1ifl~ ~ ~ ~ I~ I~ 0
Land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Improvements and utirrties 0 0 0 0 0 LIIO d L IJ ~IO ~tuO qato 0
Construction 105663 bull 49574 8064 48025 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
Other 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ~ 49amp77 9487 astib aiJt~ fiJ~ JI~i~ IJl1oieIt 17lampee D lIa qEt FUNONGS~ E ($ODDs
Current Revenue General 309 309 0 0 0 u AIISl J) 0 0 0 0
GO Bonds 113738 41751 9481 58500 ~ale~fle 7mltl ~ ~ rO)
~ v
i58O IltI~
0
PAYGO 1617 1617 0 0 0 o bull o o r 0 I r 0 0
Total ~ 49677 9487 ~I~O Jil~ IIHe YMte-11 Meo I~ 0
II qur APPROPRIATION AND ~~~~RE DATA ODDs
IDate Flrst Appropriation FY 05 Flrst Cost Estimate I Current Scope FY 15 llaqflt~ Last FYs Cost Estimate 74866 Partial Closeout Thru 0 iNew Partial Closeout 0 IToml Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for the pennanent patching and resurfacing of rural and residential roadways using durable hot mix asphalt to restore long-tenn structural integrity to the aging rural and residential roadway infrastructure The County maintains a combined total of 4210 lane miles of rural and residential roads Preventative maintenance inciudes full-depth patching of distressed areas of pavement in combination with a new hot mix asphalt wearing surface of 1-inch to 2-inches depending on the levels of observed distress A portion of this work will be perfonned by the county in-house paving crew
Cost Change R~2ctf (Qllheq-o of ~oortlQlI~QtI~f4A)J ~9- ~Potl ~~ (eQf1 $1 dded to the a proved funding in FY15-17 to maintain core transportation I tofund significantly more costly rehabi I a on wor 5 million added in FY19 and FY20 to this ongoing level of effort project The additional f ent the need for more costly roa r ich is about five times more expensive and will addre lcant deterioration in the condition of many residential or rural roads Increase cos tional $ I Ion in FY14 supplementals Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily
traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair cost as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCl) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The latest 2013 survey indicated that the current cost of the countywide backJog on road repairs is $2111 million This represents 58 percent of total residential infrastructure pavement repair needs Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle
Other The design and planning stages as well as project construction will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (MSHTO) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) RuraVresidential road mileage has been adjusted to confonn with the State inventory of road mileage maintained by the State Highway Administration (SHA) This inventory is updated annually Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 on residential and rural roads Related CiP projects include Pennanent Patching ResidentiaVRural Roads (501106) and Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary CommiSSion Washington Gas Light Company PEPCO Cable TV Verizon I United States Post Office
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
bull _--0_ __ _____ It bull
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 20850
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDpM
January IS 2015
TO
FROM
George Leven~ President County co~~
Isiah Leggett County Executive -P~--SUBJECT Amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 13-8 IS-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTransportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) $3700000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FYlS Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No S08S27) Appropriation for this project will fund road resurfacing improvements to support County roads in residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 2S2 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYlS
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYlS-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of$3700000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S IS-CMCG-7
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
montGomervcountvmdaov311
J~
~31~JtBe t iHiiiti~ 240-773-3556 lTV
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
Resolution ------- shyfutrod~ ______________ Aoo~ ______________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMCG-7 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Department ofTmnsportation Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) $3700000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source of funds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplemental appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply with avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation Qr one that is approved after January 1 ofany fisca1 year requires an affinnative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or reduce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomery County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affinnative vote ofno fewer than six members of the Council
3 The County Executive recOmmends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 13-S15-CMGG-7 Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 252 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FY15
5 The County Executive recommends an amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3700000 for Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (No 508527) and specifies that the source offunds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Marylan~ approves the following action
The FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriatioI) is approved as follows
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Resurfacing PrimaryArterial
508527 PDS $555000 GO Bonds Construction $3145000 GO Bonds
TOTAL $3700000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
Resu rfacing Primary Arterial (P508527)
Category Transporlllllon Date Last ModIIIed ~114
Sub Category Highway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facmty No Adminislaring Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Thru Total Beyond 6 Total FY13 EstFY14 6 Years FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Yr$
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ($0005
9793 1 4302 ILtI- ~-T5 915 915
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o _II ~rtO 0 0 0
so 098 9044 9944 I I K)J~ 5185 5185
26 4 22 o 0 0 0
Total 59e1f ~ dOrl middottlJ~ 6100 6100 $amp(0 ff sar FUNDIN~ ODDs) A
34565 9049 14268 ~11~ 1 1303GOBonds 1672 1384 500 o Recordation Tax Premium 25352 0 [~Wia 301~b 4797 4428 4736 5600 o
Total iN1I ~ 1+GI ~ f~ 6100 6100 6100 6100 610D o 4-1 APp~Ln~11o~lDJTURE DATA (0005)
FY15 FY16
uest
New Partial Closeout 9049
Unencumbered Belance Total Partial Closeout 96515
Description The County maintains approximately 996 lane miles of primary anr1 arterial roadways This project provides for the systematic milling repair and bituminous concrete resurfacing of selected primary and arterial roads and revitarszation of others This project Includes the Main Street Montgomery Program and provides for a systematic full-service and coordinated revitalization of the prim~ry and arterial road infrastructure to ensure viability of the primary transportation network and enhance safety and ease of use for all users Mileage of primaryarterial roads has been adjusted to conform with the inventory maintained by the State Highway Administration This inventory is updated annually
~~~aen~~ete~t~f~~ $4~9sst1~~4~i=~rf~=e7~~~ ~af~r~catblldi~r~eu-Justification ~~ Primary and arterial roadways provide transport support for tens of thousands of trips each day Primary and arterial roads connect diverse origins and destinations that include commercial retail industrial residential places of worship recreation and community facilities The repair of the Countys primary and arterial roadway Infrastructure is critical to mobility throughout the County In addition the state of disrepair of the primary and arterial roadway system causes travel delays increased traffic congestion and compromises the safety and ease of travel along all primary and arterial roads which includes pedestrians and bicyclists WeD maintained road surfaces increase safety and assist in the relief of traffic congestion In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a contemporary pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys and subsequent ratings of all primaryarterial pavements as well as calculating the rating health of the primary roadway network as a whole Physical condition inspections of the pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle The physical condition surveys note the typelevel and extent of primaryarterial pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This information is used to calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire primaryarterial network The system also provides for budget optimization and recommends annual budgets for a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy primaryarterial pavement inventory
Other One aspect of this project will focus on Improving pedestrian mobility by creating a safer walking environment utilizing selected engineering technologies and ensuring Americans with Disabilities Act (NJA) compliance Several existing Cl and operating funding sources will be focused In support of the Main Street Montgomery campaign The design and planning stages as well as final completion of the project will comply with the Department of Transportation (DOT) MarYland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) and ADA standards
Fiscal Note $8 million is the annual requirement to maintain Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 71 for PrimaryArterial roads
Disclosures fII~ ~ ~ ~U ~ C-6 e~j ~ ~act~t~~ A pedestrian impact analysis has been completed for this project J rJ Expenditures will continue indefinitely rtetoil4lII1 bull
reg
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
Resurfacing PrimaryArterial (P508527)
Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Other UtlJIties Department of Housing and Community Affairs Montgomery County Public SchoolsMaryland - National capital Parle and Planning Commission Department of Economic Development Department of PermJttlng Services Regional Services Centers Community Associations Montgomery County Pedeslrian Safety Advisory Committee Commission on People with Disabirities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROCKVILLE MARYLAND 208S0
Isiah Leggett County Executive
MEMORANDUM
January 152015
TO George Leventhal President County n~
FROM IsiahLeggett County _ve--f~middot--~shySUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and
Supplemental Appropriation 11-S 15-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomery County Government Deparbnent ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) $1000000
I am recommending a supplemental appropriation to the FY13 Capital Budget and an amendment to the FYI 5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 501106) Appropriation for this project will fund permanent road patching improvements to support County roads in the Countys residential and rural areas
This supplemental is needed because of fiscal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 1371ane miles ofCounty ro3ds by shifting these funds to FYl5
I recommend that the County Council approve this supplemental appropriation and amendment to the FYI5-20 Capital Improvements Program in the amount of $1000000 and specify the source offunds as GO Bonds
I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis action
ILbrg
Attachment Amendment to the FY13-18 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-S1S-CMCG-5
cc AI R Roshdieh Acting Director Department ofTransportation Jennifer A Hughes Director Office ofManagement and Budget
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
-------Resolution fumod~ ___________ Adopted ________
COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND
By Council President at the Request ofthe County Executive
SUBJECT Amendment to the FY15-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation 11-SI5-CMCG-5 to the FY15 Capital Budget Montgomexy County Govemment Department ofTransportation Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No 5(1106) $1000000
Background
1 Section 307 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that any supplemental appropriation shall be recommended by the County Executive who shall specify the source offunds to finance it The Council shall hold a public hearing on each proposed supplement81 appropriation after at least one weeks notice A supplemental appropriation that would comply wi~ avail the County of or put into effect a grant or a Federal State or County law or regulation or one that is approved after January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affirmative vote offive Councilmembers A supplemental appropriation for any other purpose that is approved before January 1 ofany fiscal year requires an affinnative vote ofsix Councilmembers The Council may in a single action approve more than one supplemental appropriation The Executive may disapprove or redUce a supplemental appropriation and the Council may reapprove the appropriation as ifit were an item in the annual budget
2 Section 302 ofthe Montgomexy County Charter provides that the Council may amend an approved capital improvements program at any time by an affirmative vote ofno fewer than six members ofthe Council
3 The County Executive recommends the following capital project appropriation increases
Project Project Cost Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads 501106 PDS $150000 GO Bonds
Construction S850~OOO GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
Amendment to the FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program and Supplemental Appropriation ll-SIS-CMCG-S Page Two
4 This supplemental is needed because offiScal capacity reasons The recommended amendment is consistent with the criteria for amending the CIP because the project resources have been shifted between fiscal years to provide fiscal capacity The supplemental and amendment will also help avoid the need to fund significantly more costly road rehabilitation work on 137 lane miles ofCounty roads by shifting these funds to FYIS
S The COlmty Executive recommends an amendment to the FY1S-20 Capital Improvements Program and a supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1000000 for Permanent Patching ResidentiallRural Roads (No SOI106) and specifies that the source offimds will be GO Bonds
6 Notice ofpublic hearing was given and a public hearing was held
Action
The County Council for Montgomery County Maryland approves the following action
The FYIS-20 Capital Improvements Program ofthe Montgomery County Government is amended as reflected on the attached project description form and a supplemental appropriation is approved as follows
Project Project Cost- Source Name Number Element Amount ofFunds Permanent Patching ResidentialJRural Roads S01106 PDS $IS0000 GO Bonds
Construction ~8S0000 GO Bonds TOTAL $1000000
This is a correct copy ofCouncil action
Linda M Lauer Clerk ofthe Council
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
Permanent Patching ResidentialRural Roads (PS011 06)
Category Transportation Date Last Modified 412114 Sub Category Hlghway Maintenance Required Adequate Public Facility No Administering Agency Transportation (AAGE30) Relocation Impact None Planning Area Countywide Status Ongoing
Site 1m aments and UtiliHes
GO Bonds
State Aid
Construction
Other
o o o o o o
IAnnrnnntion Request FY15 2900 ReQuest Est FY16 2900
Su I Appropriation Request 1600 -e Transfer 0
Cumulative Approprtation 17492 Expenditure 1Encumbrances 11766 Unencumbered Balance 5726
Date First on FY 11
Frrst Cost Estimate Current Scope FY15 1JJla ~
Last FYs Cost Estimate 26000 Partial Closeout Thru 0 New Partial Closeout 0 Total Partial Closeout 0
Description This project provides for pennanent patching of ruraUresidential roads in older residential communities This pennanent patching program provides for deep patching of rural and residential roads to restore limited structural integrity and proloog pavement performance This program will ensure structural viability of older residential pavements until such time that road rehabilitation occurs Based on current funding trends many residential roads identified as needing reconstruction may not be addressed for 40 years or longer The permanent patching program is designed to address this problem Pavement reconstruction involves either total removal and reconstruction of the pavement section or extensive deep patching followed by grinding along with a thick structural hot mix asphaH overlay Permanent patching may improve the pavement rating such that total rehabilitation may be considered in lieu of total reconstruction at significant overall savings
Cost Change rfeo-r fizqhtcdOt ri- nlft--1 ~feCl~~~b ~~ fopctI ~~ (ei4IJ lRerease due to addltloll of a $2992ff1i11ieft FYi-+ stlpplemellt8i aRc R19 28 to fttis eAsecteiR9 level Qf effort ll9iect Justification In FY09 the Department of Transportation instituted a pavement management system This system provides for systematic physical condition surveys The physical condition surveys note the type level and extent of residential pavement deterioration combined with average daily traffic and other usage characteristics This infonnation is usedto calculate specific pavement ratings types of repair strategies needed and associated repair costs as well as the overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the entire residential network The system also provides for budget optimization and a systematic approach to maintaining a healthy residential pavement inventory The updated 2013 pavement concfrtion survey indicated that 180 lane miles (4 percent) of residential pavement have fallen into the lowest possible category and are in need of structural patching Typically pavements rated in this category require between 15-20 percent pennanent patching per lane mile Physical condition inspections of residential pavements will occur on a 2-3 year cycle Fiscal Note $36 million is the annual cost required to maintain the current Countywide Pavement Condition Index of 68 for residential and rural roads Related CIP projects include Residential and Rural Road Rehabilitation (500914) and Resurfacing ResidentiaVRural Roads (500511) Disclosures Expenditures will continue indefinitely The Executive asserts that this project conforms to the requirements of relevant local plans as required by the Maryland Economic Growth Resource Protection and Planning Act Coordination Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Washington Gas Ught Company Department of Pennitting Services PEPCO Cable TV Verizon Montgomery County Public Schools Regional Services Centers Community Associations Commission of People with Disabilities
