10
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Effectiveness of strategies for the management and/or prevention of hypothermia within the adult perioperative environmentSandeep Moola BDS MHSM (Honours) and Craig Lockwood RN BN GradDipClinNurs MNSc The Joanna Briggs Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Abstract Background Inadvertent hypothermia is common in patients undergoing surgical procedures with a reported prevalence of perioperative hypothermia ranging from 50% to 90%. Hypothermia within the perioperative envi- ronment may have many undesired physiological effects that are associated with postoperative morbidity. There are different options for treating and/or preventing hypothermia within the adult perioperative environment, which include active and passive warming methods. This systematic review was undertaken to provide comprehensive evidence on the most effective strategies for prevention and management of inadvertent hypothermia in the perioperative environment. Objective The objective of this review was to identify the most effective methods for the treatment and/or preventions of hypothermia in intraoperative or postoperative patients. Inclusion criteria Adult patients 18 years of age, who underwent any type of surgery were included in this review. Types of interventions included were any type of linen or cover, aluminium foil wraps, forced-air warming devices, radiant warming devices and fluid warming devices. This review considered all identified prospective studies that used a clearly described process for randomisation, and/or included a control group. The primary outcome of interest was change in core body temperature. Review methods Two independent reviewers assessed methodological validity of papers selected for retrieval and any disagreements were resolved through discussion. Results Nineteen studies with a combined 1451 patients who underwent different surgical procedures were included in this review. Meta-analysis was not possible. Forced-air warming in pregnant women scheduled for caesarean delivery under regional anaesthesia prevented maternal and foetal hypothermia. Intravenous and irrigat- ing fluids warmed (38–40°C) to a temperature higher than that of room temperature by different fluid warming devices (both dry and water heated) proved significantly beneficial to patients in terms of stable haemodynamic variables, and higher core temperature at the end of the surgery. Water garment warmer was significantly (P < 0.05) effective than forced-air warming in maintaining intraoperative normothermia in orthotopic liver transplantation patients. Extra warming with forced air compared to routine thermal care was effective in reducing the incidence of surgical wound infections and postoperative cardiac complications. Passive warming with reflective heating blankets or elastic bandages wrapped around the legs tightly were found to be ineffective in reducing the incidence or magnitude of hypothermia. Conclusion There are significant benefits associated with forced-air warming. Evidence supports commencement of active warming preoperatively and monitoring it throughout the intraoperative period. Single strategies such as forced-air warming were more effective than passive warming; however, combined strategies, including preoperative commencement, use of warmed fluids plus forced-air warming as other active strategies were more effective in vulnerable groups (age or durations of surgeries). Correspondence: Mr Sandeep Moola, The Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Email: [email protected], [email protected] doi:10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00227.x Int J Evid Based Healthc 2011; 9: 337–345 © 2011 The Authors International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2011 The Joanna Briggs Institute

67287505

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 67287505

E V I D E N C E S Y N T H E S I S

Effectiveness of strategies for the management and/orprevention of hypothermia within the adultperioperative environmentjbr_227 337..345

Sandeep Moola BDS MHSM (Honours) and Craig Lockwood RN BN GradDipClinNurs MNScThe Joanna Briggs Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

AbstractBackground Inadvertent hypothermia is common in patients undergoing surgical procedures with a reportedprevalence of perioperative hypothermia ranging from 50% to 90%. Hypothermia within the perioperative envi-ronment may have many undesired physiological effects that are associated with postoperative morbidity. There aredifferent options for treating and/or preventing hypothermia within the adult perioperative environment, whichinclude active and passive warming methods. This systematic review was undertaken to provide comprehensiveevidence on the most effective strategies for prevention and management of inadvertent hypothermia in theperioperative environment.

Objective The objective of this review was to identify the most effective methods for the treatment and/orpreventions of hypothermia in intraoperative or postoperative patients.

Inclusion criteria Adult patients �18 years of age, who underwent any type of surgery were included in thisreview. Types of interventions included were any type of linen or cover, aluminium foil wraps, forced-air warmingdevices, radiant warming devices and fluid warming devices. This review considered all identified prospective studiesthat used a clearly described process for randomisation, and/or included a control group. The primary outcome ofinterest was change in core body temperature.

Review methods Two independent reviewers assessed methodological validity of papers selected for retrievaland any disagreements were resolved through discussion.

Results Nineteen studies with a combined 1451 patients who underwent different surgical procedures wereincluded in this review. Meta-analysis was not possible. Forced-air warming in pregnant women scheduled forcaesarean delivery under regional anaesthesia prevented maternal and foetal hypothermia. Intravenous and irrigat-ing fluids warmed (38–40°C) to a temperature higher than that of room temperature by different fluid warmingdevices (both dry and water heated) proved significantly beneficial to patients in terms of stable haemodynamicvariables, and higher core temperature at the end of the surgery.

Water garment warmer was significantly (P < 0.05) effective than forced-air warming in maintaining intraoperativenormothermia in orthotopic liver transplantation patients. Extra warming with forced air compared to routinethermal care was effective in reducing the incidence of surgical wound infections and postoperative cardiaccomplications.

Passive warming with reflective heating blankets or elastic bandages wrapped around the legs tightly were foundto be ineffective in reducing the incidence or magnitude of hypothermia.

Conclusion There are significant benefits associated with forced-air warming. Evidence supports commencementof active warming preoperatively and monitoring it throughout the intraoperative period. Single strategies such asforced-air warming were more effective than passive warming; however, combined strategies, including preoperativecommencement, use of warmed fluids plus forced-air warming as other active strategies were more effective invulnerable groups (age or durations of surgeries).

Correspondence: Mr Sandeep Moola, The Joanna Briggs Institute,Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide,SA 5000, Australia. Email: [email protected],[email protected]

doi:10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00227.x Int J Evid Based Healthc 2011; 9: 337–345

© 2011 The AuthorsInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2011 The Joanna Briggs Institute

Page 2: 67287505

Implications for practice• Use active warming strategies• Commence warming preoperatively• In extended surgeries or aged patients use multiple active warming strategies• Warm fluids designated for intraoperative administration• Consider pharmacotherapeutic strategies in preference to no treatment/prevention

Implications for research Future research should focus on large, high quality randomised controlled trialslooking at long-term clinical outcomes, operating temperature forced-air warming devices, different body sites andpercentage of body coverage area of active warming.

Background

Inadvertent hypothermia is common in patients undergoingsurgical procedures with a reported prevalence of periopera-tive hypothermia ranging from 50% to 90%. Inadvertenthypothermia is common in patients undergoing surgicalprocedures. Hypothermia within the perioperative environ-ment may have many undesired physiological effects thatare associated with postoperative morbidity, some of whichinclude bleeding, platelet dysfunction and shivering whichincreases oxygen consumption. Inadvertent hypothermia isdifferent from therapeutic or induced hypothermia, which isdefined as deliberate induction of hypothermia. Therefore,maintaining a state of normothermia is both beneficial to thepatient in terms of morbidity and/or mortality and the healthservice in terms of resource allocation and length of stay.

There are different options for treating and/or preventinghypothermia within the adult perioperative environment,which include active and passive warming methods. Passivewarming methods include the use of unwarmed linen oraluminium blankets and head covers. Active warmingmethods include the use of forced-air warming devices, fluidwarmers and radiant heaters.

This systematic review was undertaken to provide com-prehensive evidence on the most effective strategies for pre-vention and management of inadvertent hypothermia in theperioperative environment.

Objective

The objective of this review was to identify the most effectivemethods for the treatment and/or preventions of hypother-mia in intraoperative or postoperative patients.

Search strategy

A three-step search strategy was undertaken (Fig. 1). Stepone consisted of a limited search of Medline using the termshypothermia, surgical, perioperative, randomised controlledtrial, adult treatment and/or prevention. Step two consistedof a full search of all databases using all the key wordsidentified. Step three consisted of the review of referencelists of all included papers for further references and searched

grey literature for unpublished studies. Some of databasesincluded in the search included CINAHL, MEDLINE,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL),EMBASE, Current Contents, Scopus, TRIP database, TheDatabase of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, The Net-worked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD)and Proquest Dissertations and Theses.

Inclusion criteria and data sourcesAdult patients �18 years of age, who underwent any type ofsurgery were included in this review. Patients who weresubjected to deliberate hypothermia such as those forcardiac or neurosurgical interventions were excluded. Typesof interventions included were any type of linen or cover,aluminium foil wraps, forced-air warming devices, radiantwarming devices and fluid warming devices. Interventionsnot included in this review were: forms of warming reliantupon microwave warming of fluids, electric blankets andhumidified inhalation gasses. This review considered all iden-tified prospective studies that used a clearly describedprocess for randomisation, and/or included a control group.The primary outcome of interest was change in core body

Studiesretreived for

appraisal(n = 124)

Met inclusion& quality

criteria (n = 18)Critical appraisal

Excluded(n = 106) 1451 patients across 18 trials

Figure 1 Study selection process flow chart (This summary wasderived from Moola and Lockwood14).

338 S Moola and C Lockwood

© 2011 The AuthorsInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2011 The Joanna Briggs Institute

Page 3: 67287505

temperature. Rectal temperatures were not considered asinternal placement can affect the accuracy of readings.Papers written in languages other than English wereexcluded, the search was not limited by date, and allincluded databases were searched from their date ofinception.

Review methods

Two independent reviewers assessed methodological validityof papers selected for retrieval prior to inclusion in the reviewusing the standardised critical appraisal instruments fromthe Joanna Briggs Institute Systems for the Unified Manage-ment, Assessment and Review of Information package (JBI-SUMARI). Appraisal was based on assessing risk of bias in thefollowing four domains: allocation, performance, detectionand attrition. Data were extracted from papers included inthe review using standardised data extraction tools fromthe JBI-SUMARI and disagreements were resolved throughdiscussion. As there were no comparable randomised con-trolled trials found for this review, and as the data wereunable to be statistically combined, the data extracted fromthe included studies were synthesised into a narrativesummary.

Results

One hundred and thirty studies potentially eligible for inclu-sion in our review were identified. On final assessment, 19studies (Appendix I) were identified as fulfilling all of ourcriteria for inclusion giving a combined total of 1451patients who underwent different surgical procedures. Four-teen studies were identified for background and discussion.Ninety-seven studies did not fulfil our criteria for inclusion.

This review focused on interventions to prevent andmanage hypothermia perioperatively. Inclusion criteria werestrictly adhered to, which ensured that the review focusedon randomised clinical trials (with a description of randomi-sation process) of active and passive warming techniquesin patients aged over 18 years. Patient groups within theincluded studies in this review did not differ significantly onbaseline demographic characteristics, duration and type ofsurgery or length of anaesthesia. Patient ages ranged from18–80 years with most being older than 40 years.

The review found that the definitions of hypothermia werenot consistent across studies. There was limited reporting ofpre-specified secondary outcomes. Most of the includedstudies in the review had small sample sizes, fewer than 100patients. In all the studies, the interventions were used intra-operatively, but some included warming in preoperative andpostoperative phases. Not all studies distinguished clearlybetween these phases when describing their interventionsand/or results.

Forced-air warming in pregnant women (with high risk ofbleeding, difficulty with wound healing and cardiac prob-lems) scheduled for caesarean delivery under regional ana-esthesia prevented maternal and foetal hypothermia.1 Inarthroscopic knee surgery patients, forced-air warming did

not result in a decrease in the incidence of postoperativeshivering indicating that it was not effective or feasible toextend active warming into recovery in this patient popula-tion.2 Intravenous and irrigating fluids warmed (38–40°C) toa temperature higher than that of room temperature bydifferent fluid warming devices (both dry and water heated)proved significantly beneficial to patients in terms of stablehaemodynamic variables, and higher core temperature (coreT) at the end of the surgery (transurethral prostatectomyand orthopaedic surgery).3,4 However, prewarming irrigationfluids in knee arthroscopy patients did not prove beneficial inmaintaining normothermia.5

Water garment warmer was significantly (P < 0.05) effec-tive than forced-air warming in maintaining intraoperativenormothermia in orthotopic liver transplantation patients.6

Extra warming with forced air compared to routine thermalcare was effective in reducing the incidence of surgicalwound infections and postoperative cardiac complications,as well as shortening the length of hospital stay.7

Passive warming with reflective heating blankets or elasticbandages wrapped around the legs tightly were found to beineffective in reducing the incidence or magnitude of hypo-thermia.8 Low-flow anaesthesia with active forced-airwarming was effective in stabilising patient’s core T duringsurgical procedures.9 Only one study that included medica-tion as an intervention showed that intraoperative intrave-nous infusion of phenylephrine in the first hour ofanaesthesia in patients who underwent minor oral surgerywas associated with significantly less heat loss.9

Discussion

Inadvertent or unintended perioperative hypothermia iscommon during anaesthesia and surgical procedures result-ing in severe postoperative complications and is thought toprolong hospitalisation.10 Inadvertent hypothermia duringgeneral anaesthesia results from a combination of impairedthermoregulation and exposure to the cold environment ofthe operating room.10,11 Shivering threshold in epidural andspinal anaesthesia is lesser than in general anaesthesia.11

Core T usually decreases after the first hour of anaesthesiabecause body’s heat loss exceeds the metabolic productionof heat and after 3–5 h of anaesthesia, the core T stopsdecreasing.12 Early intervention in the operating room andrecovery room is vital to maintain normothermia. In addi-tion, continual perioperative monitoring of patient’s bodytemperature is warranted.13 Intravenous infusion of phenyle-phrine may be beneficial in preventing heat loss in patientsduring minor oral surgery; however, phenylephrine is asso-ciated with potential adverse effects that may affect thepatient’s cardiovascular system.9

Translation into practice – implementingpreventative and management strategies forinadvertent perioperative hypothermiaAs the evidence from a recent systematic review illustrates,inadvertent perioperative hypothermia is associated with arange of negative health outcomes intraoperatively and

Management of inadvertent hypothermia 339

© 2011 The AuthorsInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2011 The Joanna Briggs Institute

Page 4: 67287505

postoperatively.14 While the review identified evidence onwhich interventions are effective, and most of the tech-niques and strategies have been previously identifiedthrough primary research, surgical patients continue toexperience unplanned perioperative hypothermia.

The evidence suggests hospital costs could be reduced bybetween $2500 and $7000 per surgical patient and thatmorbidity and mortality could be decreased by promotinggood perioperative management to maintain normother-mia.15 However, a lack of intervention during the periopera-tive phase of patient care continues to place patients at riskof unplanned hypothermia.

Current guidelines and professional standards for preven-tion of perioperative hypothermia are based on eitherconsensus or earlier reviews and do not include recent rec-ommendations that inform how practice should change, nordo they effectively facilitate change based on current evi-dence. The Centre for Disease Control in their 1999 ‘Guide-line for prevention of surgical site infection’ did not providerecommendations to prevent inadvertent perioperativehypothermia because of a lack of randomised controlledtrials related to surgical site infections.16

Joanna Briggs Institute systematic reviews take a ‘bestavailable’ rather than ‘best or nothing’ approach to system-atic reviews, meaning wider forms of evidence are identifiedand included, enabling reviewers to generate recommenda-tions for practice in the absence of randomised controlledtrials rather than conclude that the evidence is inadequate.

Current guidelines include a range of decision algorithmsand generalised statements that can inform practice andare framed in the context of preoperative, intraoperativeand postoperative care. The National Institute for Health andClinical Excellence guidelines, for example, suggest a rangeof interventions depending on preoperative temperature fordifferent phases of the perioperative period. One has to askwhy then, perioperative management of unplanned hypo-thermia remains problematic.

Doreen Wagner, in a paper entitled ‘Unplanned periop-erative hypothermia’ makes the following observation ofstandards and guidelines for preventative strategies formanagement of hypothermia: ‘. . . practitioners can trackimprovements and outcomes, redesign processes for provid-ing standardised care, and commit to using current scienceto improve patient care.’15

This then is an area where further work is required. Theevidence on which interventions is effective is clear. Thebenefits to the patient and the health system are alsounequivocally clear. What is now needed is a range ofresources to enable and facilitate the translation of reviewfindings into recommendations for practice that can beimplemented and evaluated at the local level.

The evidence is in favour of active warming that is initiatedpreoperatively; this should be built into care pathways andconsideration given to routinely including information onprevention of perioperative hypothermia in patient educa-tion as an expected standard of treatment.

Routine clinical audit of surgical processes should includeauditing of the provision of patient education included

awareness of preoperative warming as a key metric, particu-larly where surgery is likely to be of an extensive timeframe.

Clinically, the expectation should be that all at-risk surgicalpatients will be warmed preoperatively, and that intraopera-tive fluids will be warmed prior to administration. Theseshould be standardised, measurable processes where routineclinical audit can establish compliance with best practicerecommendations.

Passive warming should be clearly understood to be anineffective intervention, and not seen as a viable alternativeto active warming methods.

Conclusion

The majority of the trials included in this review evaluatedactive warming techniques, more specifically forced-airwarming methods. There are significant benefits associatedwith forced-air warming in terms of better outcomes such ashigher core temperatures, reduced incidence of shiveringand morbid cardiac events, increased thermal comfort,reduced blood loss, and reduced surgical site infections andshorter length of hospital stay. Evidence supports com-mencement of active warming preoperatively and monitor-ing it throughout the intraoperative period. Single strategiessuch as forced-air warming were more effective than passivewarming; however, combined strategies, including preop-erative commencement, use of warmed fluids plus forced-airwarming as other active strategies were more effective invulnerable groups (age or durations of surgeries).

Implications for practice

The systematic review indicated that active warming tech-niques (forced-air warming) were effective in preventing andmanaging hypothermia in the perioperative environmentand based on the results from the review considerationshould be given to the following recommendations toprevent and manage inadvertent hypothermia in the perio-perative environment:• Use active warming strategies• Discontinue passive warming in vulnerable groups• Commence warming preoperatively• In extended surgeries or aged patients use multiple active

warming strategies• Warm fluids designated for intraoperative administration

Implications for research

Most of the included studies in the review had small samplesizes, fewer than 100 patients. Future research should focuson large, high quality randomised controlled trials looking atlong-term clinical outcomes, operating temperature forced-air warming devices (not just maximum set temperature),different body sites and percentage of body coverage area ofactive warming for efficient management of intraoperativehypothermia.

340 S Moola and C Lockwood

© 2011 The AuthorsInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2011 The Joanna Briggs Institute

Page 5: 67287505

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their thanks to RobertMcCann, Clinical Lecturer, The University of Adelaide andLyell Brougham, Clinical Service Coordinator, Royal AdelaideHospital for their valuable input during the course of thisreview and Mrs Maureen Bell, Research Librarian, TheUniversity of Adelaide for her help with search strategy.

References1. Horn E-P, Schroeder F, Gottschalk A et al. Active warming

during caesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 409–14.

2. Smith I, Newson CD, White PF. Use of forced-air warmingduring and after outpatient arthroscopic surgery. Anesth Analg1994; 78: 836–41.

3. Evans JWH, Singer M, Coppinger SWV, Macartney N, WalkerJM, Milroy EJG. Cardiovascular performance and core tempera-ture during transurethral prostatectomy. J Urol 1994; 152:2025–9.

4. Hasankhani H, Mohammadi E, Moazzami F, Mokhtari M, Nagh-gizadh MM. The effects of intravenous fluids temperature onperioperative hemodynamic situation, post-operative shivering,and recovery in orthopaedic surgery. Can Oper Room Nurs J2007; 25: 20–4.

5. Kelly JA, Doughty JK, Hasselbeck AN, Vacchiano CA. The effectof arthroscopic irrigation fluid warming on body temperature. JPerianesth Nurs 2000; 15: 245–52.

6. Janicki PK, Stoica C, Chapman WC et al. Water warminggarment versus forced air warming system in prevention of

intraoperative hypothermia during liver transplantation: a ran-domised controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2002; 2: 7.

7. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia toreduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shortenhospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and TemperatureGroup. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1209–15.

8. Whitney A. The efficiency of a reflective heating blanket inpreventing hypothermia in patients undergoing intra-abdominal procedures. AANA J 1990; 58: 212–15.

9. Ikeda T, Ozaki M, Sessler DI, Kazama T, Ikeda K, Sato S. Intra-operative phenylephrine infusion decreases the magnitude ofredistribution hypothermia. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 462–5.

10. Sessler DI. Mild Perioperative Hypothermia. N Engl J Med 1997;336: 1730–7.

11. Buggy DJ, Crossley AW. Thermoregulation, mild perioperativehypothermia and postanaesthetic shivering. Br J Anaesth 2000;84: 615–28.

12. Mahoney CB, Odom J. Maintaining intraoperative normother-mia: a meta-analysis of outcomes with costs. AANA J 1999; 67:155–64.

13. Burns SM. Revisiting hypothermia: a critical concept. Crit CareNurse 2001; 21: 83–6.

14. Moola S, Lockwood C. The effectiveness of strategies for themanagement and/or prevention of hypothermia within theadult perioperative environment: systematic review. JBI Libraryof Systematic Reviews 2010; 8: 752–92.

15. Wagner VD. Unplanned perioperative hypothermia. AORN J2006 Feb. Accessed 7 Sep 2010. Available from: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FSL/is_2_83/ai_n16359780

16. NICE. Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia: The Management ofInadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia in Adults. London:National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Guideline65, 2008.

Appendix I

Included studies

Study Butwick 20071

Method Randomised controlled trial (RCT)Participants Thirty healthy American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I or II pregnant women (18 and 40 years of age)

undergoing caesarean delivery with spinal anaesthesiaIntervention Forced-air warming unit with lower body warming coverOutcomes Oral temperature, shivering, pain intensity and thermal comfort scoresRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentNo/adequate – sequentially numbered opaque envelopes. Blinded investigators assessed oral temperature,

shivering and thermal comfortNotes Intraoperative lower body forced air-warming does not prevent intraoperative hypothermia or shivering in women

undergoing elective caesarean delivery with spinal anaesthesia

Study Horn 20022

Method RCTParticipants 30 healthy pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean delivery epidural anaesthesiaIntervention Forced-air warming (n = 15, 29 to 37 years) or to passive insulation(n = 15, 26 to 36 years)Outcomes Core temperature was measured at the tympanic membrane, and shivering was graded by visual inspection.

Patients evaluated their thermal sensation with visual analogue scalesRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentNo/adequate – sequentially numbered opaque envelopes

Notes Perioperative forced-air warming of women undergoing caesarean delivery with epidural anaesthesia preventsmaternal and foetal hypothermia, reduces maternal shivering. The sample size of this study was based on anexpected treatment effect of 1°C

Management of inadvertent hypothermia 341

© 2011 The AuthorsInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2011 The Joanna Briggs Institute

Page 6: 67287505

Study Mason 19983

Method RCTParticipants 64 morbidly obese patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (17–59 years)Intervention Control group – warmed cotton blankets, experimental group – Bair Hugger forced-air warming systemOutcomes Blood loss, bladder temperatures, shiveringRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentNo/adequate – sealed opaque envelopes

Notes An observer evaluating the outcomes for all study subjects was unaware of the group assignment

Study Smith 19944

Method RCTParticipants One hundred and twenty-seven healthy outpatients scheduled for arthroscopic knee surgery under general

anaesthesiaIntervention Forced-air warming (n = 69) with warmed cotton blankets (n = 58). The forced air-warming unit (B-H model 500)

was set at a high of 43.3 � 2.8°COutcomes Core temperature was measured at the tympanic membrane. Shivering was assessed as absent or presentRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentYes/unclear

Notes Only phase II of the trial was considered as it fulfilled the inclusion criteria

Study Elmore 19985

Method RCTParticipants One hundred patients who underwent repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms or aortoiliac occlusive diseaseIntervention Circulating water mattress – 50 (60 to 76 years) or a forced-air warming blanket – 50 (62 to 74 years)Outcomes Core temperatures, postoperative length of stay, cardiac complications, and death ratesRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentUnclear. Cardiac complications monitored Holter Monitor were interpreted by blinded cardiologists

Notes Normothermia is protective for infrarenal aortic surgical patients; and forced-air warming blankets provideimproved temperature maintenance compared with circulating water mattresses

Study Lee 20046

Method Single-blind RCTParticipants 60 male and female patients between 18 and 80 yearsIntervention Radiant warming (directed at the palm of the hand), forced-air warming (upper or lower body)Outcomes Core temperature, thermal comfort, shiveringRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentNo/adequate – randomisation results were concealed in opaque envelopes. Patients were blind to group

assignmentNotes This study was supported by a grant from Fisher and Paykel. Suntouch radiant warming was not as effective as

forced-air warming in maintaining normothermia during long surgical operations

Study Camus 19957

Method RCTParticipants 16 ASA status I and II adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia.

Control group – eight (38–46 years), study group – eight (42–50 years)Intervention Forced-air warming for one hour before induction of anaesthesia (prewarmed group), wool blanket in control

groupOutcomes Core temperature (tympanic membrane), shivering and thermal comfortRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentNo/adequate – shivering quantitatively evaluated by an independent observer blinded to thermal management

Notes Preoperative skin surface warming is particularly helpful during short procedures because redistributionhypothermia is otherwise difficult to treat

Study Fossum 20018

Method Pretest/post-test experimental designParticipants 100 patients (ASA I, II or III) 18+ years of age scheduled for a surgical procedure that required general anaesthesiaIntervention Prewarming by using a forced-air warm blanket (n = 50) or a cotton blanket (n = 50)Outcomes Pre and postoperative core body temperatures with a tympanic membrane thermometer. Patients’ self-report of

thermal comfort. ShiveringRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentNo/adequate – 50 sealed packets contained a blue dot (control) and 50 sealed packets contained a red dot

(treatment)Notes The investigators recommend the use of forced air prewarming for all surgical patients. Study cannot be

generalised to all institutions and populations because of the limitations in patient population, length ofanaesthesia time and types of surgeries performed

342 S Moola and C Lockwood

© 2011 The AuthorsInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2011 The Joanna Briggs Institute

Page 7: 67287505

Study Wong 20079

Method RCTParticipants One hundred and three patients over 18 years old who underwent elective major abdominal surgery were

randomly allocated to either perioperative warming group (n = 47) or control group (n = 56)Intervention All patients included in this study were placed on warming mattresses 2 h before transfer to the operating theatre.

However, intraoperatively the mattresses were switched on in the warming group, whereas mattresses wereswitched off in the control group

Outcomes Core temperature was monitored using a tympanic thermometer before and after surgery. Wound complicationsand blood loss

Risk of bias/allocationconcealment

No/adequate – sealed opaque envelopes containing computer generated numbers. A blinded observer inspectedoperation site for evidence of wound complications and blood loss

Notes Intention-to-treat analysis was used to evaluate outcomes

Study Evans 199410

Method RCTParticipants Sixty-five patients, between 50–80 years scheduled to undergo transurethral prostatectomy to two groups known

as standard or isothermicIntervention Patients in the standard group received ambient temperature irrigating fluid (21°C) and the patients in the

isothermic group received irrigation fluid heated to 38°COutcomes Core temperature was measured trans-oesophageallyRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentUnclear

Notes 13 out of 65 patients were excluded from the final analysis due to violations of anaesthetic protocol and bladdertumour

Study Kelly 200011

Method RCTParticipants 24 adult ASA class I and II patientsIntervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive warmed arthroscopic irrigation solution or room-temperature irrigation

solutionOutcomes Mean per cent temperature decrease from preoperative baseline. Tympanic temperatures were monitored every

15 min throughout the surgical and postanaesthesia recovery periodsRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentUnclear

Notes Prevention and treatment of hypothermia are important to patient safety and comfort

Study Hasankhani 200712

Method RCTParticipants 60 adult patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery (ASA status I)Intervention Patients were randomly divided into two groups according to intraoperative i.v. fluids management. In 30 patients

(hypothermia group) all i.v. fluids infused were at room temperature. In the other 30 patients (normothermiagroup) all i.v. fluids were warmed using a dry i.v. fluid warmer

Outcomes Core temperature, perioperative pulse rate, blood pressure, shivering, recovery time and intraoperativeoesophageal and skin temperature were measured

Risk of bias/allocationconcealment

Unclear. Presence or absence of shivering was recorded by a blinded assessor

Notes Intraoperative i.v. fluid warming reduces perioperative changes to the hemodynamic situation, postoperativeshivering and recovery time

Study Janicki 200213

Method RCTParticipants 24 adult patients (18–65 years old) enrolled in one of two intraoperative temperature management groups during

orthotopic liver transplantationIntervention The water-garment group (n = 12) received warming with a body temperature (oesophageal) set point of 36.8°C.

The forced-air warmer group (n = 12) received routine warming therapy using upper- and lower-body forced-airwarming system

Outcomes Body core temperature (primary outcome) was recorded intraoperatively and during the two hours after surgery inboth groups

Risk of bias/allocationconcealment

Yes/inadequate. Open labelled trial

Notes The investigated water warming system results in better maintenance of intraoperative normothermia than routineforced-air warming applied to upper and lower body

Management of inadvertent hypothermia 343

© 2011 The AuthorsInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2011 The Joanna Briggs Institute

Page 8: 67287505

Study Kurz 199614

Method Double-blind RCTParticipants Two hundred patients (18–80 years) who underwent colorectal resection for cancer or inflammatory bowel diseaseIntervention Routine intraoperative thermal care (hypothermia group, n = 40) or additional warming (normothermia group,

n = 40)Outcomes Surgical wound infection, thermal comfort core temperature. Wound infections were evaluated by a blinded

observerRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentAdequate/yes – computer generated codes maintained in numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes

Conclusions Maintaining normothermia intraoperatively is likely to decrease the incidence of infectious complications inpatients undergoing colorectal resection and to shorten their hospitalisations

Study Frank 199715

Method Stratified single-blind RCTParticipants 300 patients age greater than 60 years, scheduled for peripheral vascular, abdominal, or thoracic surgical

procedures and scheduled for postoperative admission to the intensive care unitIntervention Comparison of routine thermal care (hypothermic group) to additional supplemental warming care (normothermic

group)Outcomes Morbid cardiac event, cardiac outcomes were assessed in a double-blind fashion. Haemodynamic monitoring.

Mean core temperature (eight body sites were monitored – two core sites and six skin-surface sites)Risk of bias/allocation

concealmentAdequate/yes – opaque sealed envelopes

Notes In patients with cardiac risk factors who are undergoing non-cardiac surgery, the perioperative maintenance ofnormothermia is associated with a reduced incidence of morbid cardiac events and ventricular tachycardia

Study Sun 200416

Method RCTParticipants Sixty term pregnant women in a general hospital, ASA class I–II who underwent elective caesarian delivery under

epidural anaesthesia were randomly allocated to either treatment group or control groupIntervention Thirty patients in the treatment group received leg wrapping with tight elastic bandages and 30 patients in the

control group had their legs loosely covered by elastic bandagesOutcomes Core temperature and shiveringRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentNo/adequate – random assignments were kept in sealed, sequentially numbered envelope until use

Notes Leg wrapping with tight elastic bandages has no significant benefit in terms of reducing the incidence ormagnitude of hypothermia and preventing shivering

Study Whitney 199017

Method RCTParticipants 40 female patients who underwent intra-abdominal gynaecological proceduresIntervention Patients were allocated either to experimental group or control group. Patients in the experimental group had

reflective drapes applied to cover maximum body surface and warmed cotton thermal blankets were used in thecontrol group

Outcomes Core temperature was measured in all patients by oesophageal thermistor probesRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentUnclear

Notes Reflective blankets are not effective than warmed cotton blankets in preventing intraoperative hypothermia duringintra-abdominal gynaecological procedures

Study Berti 199718

Method RCTParticipants 30 ASA physical status I and II patients (62 to 75 years), who were scheduled for elective hip or knee arthroplasty

and were free from systemic diseaseIntervention Low-flow anaesthesia with additional reflective blankets, low-flow anaesthesia with active forced-air warmingOutcomes Core temperatureRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentUnclear

Notes Passive heat retention by means of low-flow anaesthesia alone and in combination with reflective blankets isineffective in maintaining intraoperative normothermia and definitely inferior to active forced-air warming

344 S Moola and C Lockwood

© 2011 The AuthorsInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2011 The Joanna Briggs Institute

Page 9: 67287505

Study Ikeda 199919

Method Single-blind RCTParticipants 18 ASA physical status I–II patients undergoing minor oral surgeryIntervention Patients were randomly assigned to an infusion of 0.5 mg/kg/min phenylephrine i.v. or no treatment (control)Outcomes Core temperature at tympanic membrane, heart rate with a three-lead ECG, haemodynamic responses and

ambient temperatureRisk of bias/allocation

concealmentUnclear

Notes Core temperature reduction during the first hour of anaesthesia decreased less in patients given phenylephrinethan in untreated controls

References to included citations

1. Butwick AJ, Lipman SS, Carvalho B. Intraoperative forced air warming during caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia does not preventmaternal hypothermia. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 1413–19.

2. Horn E-P, Schroeder F, Gottschalk A et al. Active warming during caesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 409–14.3. Mason DS, Sapala JA, Wood MH, Sapala MA. Influence of a forced air warming system on morbidly obese patients undergoing Roux-en-Y

gastric bypass. Obes Surg 1998; 8: 453–60.4. Smith I, Newson CD, White PF. Use of forced-air warming during and after outpatient arthroscopic surgery. Anesth Analg 1994; 78:

836–41.5. Elmore JR, Franklin DP, Youkey JR, Oren JW, Frey CM. Normothermia is protective during infrarenal aortic surgery. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28:

984–92.6. Lee L, Leslie K, Kayak E, Myles PS. Intraoperative patient warming using radiant warming or forced-air warming during long operations.

Anaesth Intensive Care 2004; 32: 358–61.7. Camus Y, Delva E, Sessler DI, Lienhart A. Pre-induction skin-surface warming minimises intraoperative core hypothermia. J Clin Anesth

1995; 7: 384–8.8. Fossum S, Hays J, Henson MM. A comparison study on the effects of prewarming patients in the outpatient surgery setting. J Perianaesth

Nurs 2001; 16: 187–94.9. Wong PF, Kumar S, Bohra A, Whetter D, Leaper DJ. Randomised clinical trial of perioperative systemic warming in major elective

abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 421–6.10. Evans JWH, Singer M, Coppinger SWV, Macartney N, Walker JM, Milroy EJG. Cardiovascular performance and core temperature during

transurethral prostatectomy. J Urol 1994; 152: 2025–9.11. Kelly JA, Doughty JK, Hasselbeck AN, Vacchiano CA. The effect of arthroscopic irrigation fluid warming on body temperature. J Perianesth

Nurs 2000; 15: 245–52.12. Hasankhani H, Mohammadi E, Moazzami F, Mokhtari M, Naghgizadh MM. The effects of intravenous fluids temperature on perioperative

hemodynamic situation, post-operative shivering, and recovery in orthopaedic surgery. Can Oper Room Nurs J 2007; 25: 20–4.13. Janicki PK, Stoica C, Chapman WC et al. Water warming garment versus forced air warming system in prevention of intraoperative

hypothermia during liver transplantation: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2002; 2: 7.14. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospital-

ization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1209–15.15. Frank SM, Fleisher LA, Breslow MJ et al. Perioperative maintenance of normothermia reduces the incidence of morbid cardiac events: a

randomised clinical trial. JAMA 1997; 277: 1127–34.16. Sun HL, Ling QD, Sun WZ et al. Lower limb wrapping prevents hypotension, but not hypothermia or shivering, after the introduction of

epidural anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 241–4.17. Whitney A. The efficiency of a reflective heating blanket in preventing hypothermia in patients undergoing intra-abdominal procedures.

AANA J 1990; 58: 212–15.18. Berti M, Casati A, Torri G, Aldegheri G, Lugani D, Fanelli G. Active warming, not passive heat retention, maintains normothermia during

combined epidural-general anaesthesia for hip and knee arthroplasty. J Clin Anaesth 1997; 9: 482–6.19. Ikeda T, Ozaki M, Sessler DI, Kazama T, Ikeda K, Sato S. Intraoperative phenylephrine infusion decreases the magnitude of redistribution

hypothermia. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 462–5.

Management of inadvertent hypothermia 345

© 2011 The AuthorsInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2011 The Joanna Briggs Institute

Page 10: 67287505

Copyright of International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its

content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's

express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.