Upload
brent-gray
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
Stark spectrum simulation of XStark spectrum simulation of X22YY44
asymmetric molecules: application to asymmetric molecules: application to ethylene in a MFI-type host zeoliteethylene in a MFI-type host zeolite
M. Sanzharov, M. Rotger, M. Sanzharov, M. Rotger, V. BoudonV. Boudon, M. Loëte, , M. Loëte, N. Zvereva-Loëte, A. Ballandras, G. WeberN. Zvereva-Loëte, A. Ballandras, G. Weber
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne, UMR 5209 CNRS - Université de Bourgogne
9 av. A. Savary, BP 47870, F-21078 DIJON Cedex – France
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
ContentsContents
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical model
3. Experimental details
4. Simulations
5. Conclusion and perspectives
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
1.Introduction
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
Porosity of MFI zeolite Adsorption of ethylene on Adsorption of ethylene on highly siliceous ZSM-5 highly siliceous ZSM-5
zeolitezeoliteApproachesApproaches
ab initio calculations of ethylene in zeolithe
ab initio calculations for ethylene-ethylene complex
Stark calculations
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
2. Theoretical model
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
H s =H0 +hs =H0 + μZE +12αZZEZ
2
L m value
0 0
2 -2 0
2 -1 0
2 0
2 1 0
2 2 0
−1
3
2
3
αZZ = −1
3A(0) +
2
3A(2)
A(L ) = α L ,n({ i} ,Γ)
{ i}∑
n,Γ∑ C(L ,nΓ)⊗P({ i} ,Γ)⎡⎣ ⎤⎦
(Ag)
αZZ = 0;0 ZZ A(0) + 2;m ZZm∑ A(2)
%μΘ = 1;m Θ
m∑ %μ (1g ,0Γu ),{i} C (1g ,0Γg )⊗M ({i},Γu )⎡⎣ ⎤⎦
{i}∑
Γ∑
(Au )
m X Y Z
1 0
0 0 0 1
-1 0
1
2
−1
2
−i
2
−i
2
P({i},Γ) andand M ({i},Γu ) are rovibrational operatorsare rovibrational operators
Stark HamiltonianStark Hamiltonian
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
H =H{P0=GS} +H{P1 }+...+H{Pk }
+...+H{Pn}
Initial Initial HamiltonianHamiltonian
Effective HamiltonianEffective Hamiltonian
H <Pn> =P<Pn>HP<Pn> =H{GS}
<Pn> +H{ P1}
<Pn> +...+H{ Pn}
<Pn>
H{Pk }= t{ns}{ms}
Ω(K ,nΓ)Γ1Γ2Γvβ RΩ(K ,nΓ)⊗ε V{ns}{ms}Γ1Γ2Γv( )
indices∑
(Ag)
t – model parameterst – model parametersV – vibrational operatorV – vibrational operatorR - rotational operatorR - rotational operator
Rovibrational coupled basisRovibrational coupled basis
J,nrCr ⊗ {vs} ,Cv{ }
The zero-field Hamiltonian operatorThe zero-field Hamiltonian operator
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
Selection rulesSelection rules
C '=CΔM =0ΔJ =0,1,2
Stark matrixStark matrixEvolution of the energy Evolution of the energy levels with the rise of an levels with the rise of an
electric fieldelectric field
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
SifS =K ifgie
hcEi /kT Φ fS μZ
(Au ) ΦiS
2+ Φ f
S μX(Au ) Φi
S2+ Φ f
S μY(Au ) Φi
S2
{ }
Kif =8π 3
hcQ(T )LT0
Tσ if 1−e
−hcσ if
kT⎛
⎝⎜⎞
⎠⎟
-the Loschmidt constant L=2,686754.10the Loschmidt constant L=2,686754.1019 19 cmcm-1-1
-the reference temperature Tthe reference temperature T00=273,15 K=273,15 K-the temperature of gas T in Kthe temperature of gas T in K-the partition function of system Q(T)the partition function of system Q(T)
gi =
7siCi =Aτ 3siCi =B1τ
3siCi =B2τ
3siCi =B3τ
⎧
⎨⎪⎪
⎩⎪⎪
€
Φ fS μΘ
(Au ) Φ iS = V CMσ( )
JCαM
Jα
∑J 'α '
∑ VJ 'Cα 'M 'CM 'σ '( ) Φ f
RV μΘ(Au ) Φ i
RV
Stark electric dipole moment intensitiesStark electric dipole moment intensities
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
The truncation of Stark matrix problem (I)The truncation of Stark matrix problem (I)
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
The truncation of Stark matrix problem (II)The truncation of Stark matrix problem (II)
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
3. Experimental details
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
In situ experimental set-up
UHV magnetic sampletransporter
Baratron pressuregauges (10 et 1000 hPa)
Infrared cell
Input of drynitrogen gas
Heat chamber
Gas supply & high vacuum
Gas andvacuum valves
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
4. Simulations
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
Spectrum Spectrum simulationsimulation of the of the 1212 band with band with
a zero-fielda zero-field
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
High resolution Stark spectrumHigh resolution Stark spectrum
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
ComparisonComparison95,5 mbar, Mmax=20, Res=3 cm-1
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
5. Conclusion and perspectives
65th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 21–25, 2010
Conclusion and perspectivesConclusion and perspectives
- For the value of an electric field E≈10 GV/m we observe a For the value of an electric field E≈10 GV/m we observe a shift of the νshift of the ν1212 band of Δω=8 cm band of Δω=8 cm-1-1
- The obtained results are consistant with the experimental The obtained results are consistant with the experimental results and the results of results and the results of ab initio ab initio calculations (5.14 GV/m calculations (5.14 GV/m with PBE1PBE/6-31++(2d,2p) level of theowith PBE1PBE/6-31++(2d,2p) level of theory)
- Stark spectrum simulation of the Stark spectrum simulation of the 99 and and 11 11 bands bands
- Stark Raman spectraStark Raman spectra
- Multipole electric fieldsMultipole electric fields