Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
July 17, 2 Appendiaddressi Abstract The Lewand Regu Quality The NRDsampling84,” and educationRegulatioFigure 1.Table 1. Focus onPierce CoNRD, Lofertilizer Bazile Greview thplan are iAssessminsight todue to noAttachme Groundwmanage g84, and oimplemen
2014
ix to the Lewing groundw
t:
wis and Clarkulations to ad
D has additiog has shown west of Bloo
n efforts wilons will be i. which reprereflects rece
n groundwateounties has lower Elkhornand groundwroundwater
he groundwaincluded as Aent of Agrico the source on-point sourent B.
water Managgroundwaterother areas ifnt the action
wis and Clawater qualit
k NRD is addddress Groun
onal referenctwo primaryomfield, refel be implemmplementedesents nitrateent nitrate sam
er nitrate conled to a coorn NRD, and water managManagemen
ater quality cAttachment hemical Conof contaminrce agronom
ement Area r quality neef necessary. n tasks of the
ark Groundty and quan
ding an appendwater “qu
ce data relaty areas of coerred to as “ented in thos
d to address te concentratmpling resul
ntamination rdinated effoLower Niob
gement. Thent Plan (BGMconcerns, andA. A technintaminants in
nation in the mic sources.
Rules and Rds of the ideRevision of
e BGMP.
1
water Manantity.
endix to its euality” and “
ting to grounncern, east oDolphin Towse areas. If nthe issue. Tions in irrigalts in the are
in the Bazilort with the obrara NRD) e NRDs haveMP). Excerpd list the goaical report byn the Creighregion, andTo review t
Regulations wentified areasf the rules an
agement Ru
existing Grouquantity” iss
ndwater “quaof Hartingtonwnship”. Innecessary, P
The areas of cation wells seas identified
e Creek areaother NRDs ito educate ree worked wipts of the plaals, objectivey UNL Wate
hton Area (7/indicates co
the conclusio
will be reviss of Dolphinnd regulation
HartinOffice
FaxEmail: l
ules and Reg
undwater Msues. .
ality” issuesn, referred to
ncreased monPhase II Ruleconcern are sampled acrod.
a of Knox, Ain the area (Uesidents andith DEQ to dan which defes, and actioer Center on/2000) provi
ontaminationon section of
sed to allow tn Township ans is also nec
July 17,
608 N. RobiP.O. Box
ngton, NE 6e: (402) 254-x: (402) 254-lcnrd@harte
gulations
anagement R
. Annual nito as “East Hnitoring and es and identified onoss the Distr
Antelope, andUpper Elkho
d improve develop the fine the areaon tasks of thn Evaluation ides addition
n is most likef this report,
the NRD to and East Hwcessary to
2014
inson x 518
68739 -6758 -6759 el.net
Rules
trate Hwy
n rict.
d orn
a, he and
nal ely see
wy
2 July 17, 2014
Quantity Groundwater quantity has held relatively stable across the District through the years, until the spring of 2013 when the largest, single year decline was observed in many of the wells measured compared to the spring of 2012. Groundwater level changes from 2012 to 2013 are represented in Figure 2. The NRD also received several reports of groundwater use conflicts during the summer of 2012, the approximate location of those instances are shown on Figure 3. Drought and/or in season pumping could further impact those conflicts. Outside factors, including economic considerations, farm programs, and conservation plan compliance, have a bearing on groundwater usage. During the last 5 years, groundwater development for irrigation has increased dramatically in the LCNRD. Groundwater quantity has been generally stable as monitored by static water level readings however recent drought and irrigation development has prompted the LCNRD to draft rules and regulations to better manage groundwater resources. The drafted rules and regulations include identified sub-areas within the NRD to determine and isolate problems with aquifers, an expanded well permit procedure that includes the entire District (Figure 4.), “triggers” for elevated response methods to deal with water quantity issues, and associated action tools for management. Those features will provide for certification of irrigated acres and expansion of those acres, flow meter requirements, variance or transfer requests to deal with exceptions and enforcement methods to insure compliance. The subareas defined by the District are based on the first aquifer encountered and/or the expected potential to access a high yielding groundwater source. The subareas defined as “Limited Potential” are based on well logs of wells completed in the District and do not indicate the absence of high yielding wells, it indicates the potential to locate a high yielding well in the area is less likely than in the “Remaining Area”. Subareas are outlined in Figure 4. The LCNRD has initiated development of a Voluntary Integrated Management Plan (IMP) for water resources with DNR. Work on the IMP will begin in 2014. It is the intent of the District to utilize the IMP as the guiding document for ground and surface water planning. With these thoughts in mind the LCNRD hereby adopts the attached rules and regulations addressing Groundwater Quantity.
Table 1. Areas of groundwater quality concern.
EAST HWY 84 - Cedar County
T30N & T31N, R2E November 18, 2013
1/4,1/4 Sec TWP RNG Register # NRD # 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013NW 3 30 2E G-057535 C3 8.0 10.2 10.2 11.5 12.3 11.2 12.0 11.8 10.9 11.6 9.5NE 3 30 2E G-062440 C4 12.8 14.2 13.2 14.1 15.3 14.4 12.8 12.8 12.2 13.7 13.8NWNW 2 30 2E G-089386 C5 7.8 8.1 7.7 8.2 8.6 7.0 7.7 7.7 8.2 9.4 9.4SESW 35 31 2E G-095282 C6 8.7 8.7 9.4 9.7 10.9 11.2 9.9 9.9 8.5 12.2 2.1NW 34 31 2E G-099174 C7 3.8 3.9 4.4 3.8 4.2 9.2 4.5 4.5 5.1 5.3 6.5SWSE 34 31 2E G-056746 C18 9.4 11.0 10.2 11.9 13.7 12.8 12.8 13.2 11.4 12.2 11.8SW 4 30 2E G-097437 C26 10.8 12.6 9.4 11.4 11.3 11.3 10.3 11.2 11.0SE 4 30 2E NONE C34R 3.5 3.0 3.0 4.8 3.1 14.4
Average Nitrate Level 8.4 9.4 9.4 10.3 10.6 10.1 9.3 9.3 8.9 9.8 9.8
Maximum Nitrate Level 12.8 14.2 13.2 14.1 15.3 14.4 12.8 13.2 12.2 13.7 14.4
DOLPHIN TWP - Knox County
T31N, R2W November 18, 2013
1/4,1/4 Sec TWP RNG Register # NRD # 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013SESE 21 31 2W G-041985 K2 21.7 21.9 22.4 21.5 20.8 15.7 8.4 8.4 8.4 6.3 6.3SENE 21 31 2W G-056155 K3 19.2 18.2 18.2 18.8 24.4 20.4 23.4 20.7 20.7 17.9 14.0NWNW 22 31 2W G-042322 K4 14.8 13.7 13.7 13.8 13.8 12.7 18.0 16.5 16.3 17.0 18.6SWSW 15 31 2W G-057492 K5 11.0 11.1 11.4 11.8 11.5 11.1 11.2 11.2 7.4 13.2 12.2SWSW 8 31 2W G-050196 K6 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 6.2 6.2NE 16 31 2W NONE K49 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 9.3 7.3 9.1 7.8 9.1 15.5 19.4NW 16 31 2W NONE K52 15.3 15.9 16.3 16.1 17.2 14.1 13.2 14.7 16.1 15.3 14.2SESW 26 31 2W G-093192 K53 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.6NWNE 28 31 2W G-052944 K55 18.6 20.2 19.5 20.4 22.7 18.5 17.1 16.0 13.8 14.4 18.1SE 22 31 2W G-051970 K56 8.2 7.7 7.8 8.2 10.0 7.5 6.5 8.1 7.5 10.6 6.6NW 21 31 2W NONE K57 2.2 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 4.8 5.9 5.9SW 22 31 2W G-058943 K63 12.2 12.6 12.6 12.5 11.5 12.8 13.5 14.9 15.9 9.5 16.2
Average Nitrate Level 11.9 9.9 9.8 10.0 10.6 9.0 8.9 9.2 9.7 10.3 11.6
Maximum Nitrate Level 21.7 21.9 22.4 21.5 24.4 20.4 23.4 20.7 20.7 17.9 19.4
Values in orange have been carried over.
Values in orange have been carried over.
_̂
_̂ _̂
_̂
_̂_̂
_̂
_̂_̂_̂
_̂
_̂
_̂_̂ _̂
_̂_̂
_̂
_̂
_̂
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(!(
!(!(
!( !(
!( !( !( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!( !( !(
!(!(!( !(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
T32 R01E
T30 R03E
T29 R05E
T31 R01E T31 R02E
T30 R01ET30 R04E T30 R05E
T30 R02E
T31 R03E T31 R04E
T32 R02E
T32 R04WT32 R02W
T31 R01W
T32 R01W
T31 R02W
T29 R05W
T30 R01W
T29 R01W
T30 R04W T30 R03WT30 R05W
T32 R03W
T31 R04W T31 R03WT31 R05W
T32 R05W
T31 R05E
T29 R04W
T29 R04E
T30 R06E
T28 R05E
T33 R01ET33 R01W
T32 R03E
T30 R02W
T33 R02WT33 R04W T33 R03W
T29 R01ET29 R06E
T28 R06E
T32 R04E
T33 R05W
T29 R02E
T28 R04E
T31 R06E
T27 R06E
T33 R02E
T29 R03W
T32 R05ELindy
Wynot
Obert
Ponca
Allen
Santee
Center
Magnet
Crofton
MaskellFordyce
Newcastle
Coleridge
Waterbury
Creighton
St. Helena
Hartington
Bloomfield
Martinsburg
Bazile Mills
Knox
Cedar
Dixon
FIGURE2013 Nitrate Results plotted onFist Aquifer Encountered Map
Lewis and Clark Natural Resources DistrictDATE: March 18, 2014
M:\a
rcg
is\2
013
Nitr
ate
Res
ults
- D
istr
ict\2
013
_Nitr
ate_
Res
ults
_Dis
tric
t_fo
r G
WM
P.m
xd
Use
r: a
sudb
eck
±Sources:Hillshade - Developed from DNR DEM 2.5 0 2.5 5 7.5
Miles1:260,000
1
Legend
Bazile_GWMA
First Aquifer Encountered
Missouri River Alluvium
Undifferentiated Sandstone, Sand and Gravel
Bedrock (Niobrara)
Bedrock (Dakota)
!( New - not sampled
!( Nitrate < 5 ppm
!( Nitrate 5-10 ppm
!( Nitrate 10-20 ppm
!( Nitrate > 20 ppm
DOLPHIN
EAST HWY 84
District GW Quality - 2013
Bazile Ground Water Management Area
_̂
_̂ _̂
_̂
_̂_̂
_̂
_̂_̂_̂
_̂
_̂
_̂_̂ _̂
_̂_̂
_̂_̂
_̂
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
-0.98
-2.96
-9.92
-1.19
-5.51
-5
-1.12
-21.1
-4.9-2.3
-2.9
-2.8
-5.7
-2.92
-1.67
-3.58
-7.18
-0.81-7.13
-4.44
-5.86
-2.46
-0.13 -7.24
-8.62
-2.260.46
-2.07
-1.47
-1.93
T32 R01E
T30 R03E
T29 R05E
T31 R01E T31 R02E
T30 R01E T30 R04E T30 R05ET30 R02E
T31 R03E T31 R04E
T32 R02ET32 R04W
T32 R02W
T31 R01W
T32 R01W
T31 R02W
T29 R05W
T30 R01W
T29 R01W
T30 R04W T30 R03WT30 R05W
T32 R03W
T31 R04W T31 R03WT31 R05W
T32 R05W
T31 R05E
T30 R06E
T29 R04W
T29 R04E
T28 R05E
T33 R01ET33 R01W
T32 R03E
T30 R02W
T33 R02WT33 R04W T33 R03W
T29 R06E
T29 R01E
T28 R06E
T33 R05W
T29 R02E
T28 R04E
T31 R06E
T27 R06E
T33 R02E
T32 R04E
T29 R03W
T30 R07E
T32 R05ELindy
Wynot
Obert
Ponca
Allen
Santee
Center
Magnet
Crofton
MaskellFordyce
Newcastle
Coleridge
Waterbury
Creighton
St. Helena
Hartington
Bloomfield
Martinsburg
Bazile Mills
KnoxCedar
Dixon
FIGUREDifference in Water Level, Spring 2012 to Spring 2013
Plotted on Fist Aquifer Encountered MapLewis and Clark Natural Resources DistrictDATE: March 18, 2014
M:\a
rcg
is\2
013
Wat
er L
evel
Cha
nge
s\20
13_G
roun
dwat
er_
leve
l_ch
ange
_21
02_2
013_
for_
GW
MP.
mxd
Use
r: a
sudb
eck
±Sources:Hillshade - Developed from DNR DEM 2.5 0 2.5 5 7.5
Miles1:274,558
1
Legend
First Aquifer Encountered
Missouri River Alluvium
Undifferentiated Sandstone, Sand and Gravel
Bedrock (Niobrara)
Bedrock (Dakota)
!( Not_Defined
!( Sand_and_Gravel
!( Ogallala
!( Niobara
District GW Level Change - Spring 2012 to Spring 2013
Knox Cedar
Dixon
T32 R01E
T30 R03E
T29 R05E
T31 R01ET31 R02E
T30 R01E T30 R04E T30 R05ET30 R02E
T31 R03E T31 R04E
T32 R02ET32 R04W T32 R02W
T31 R01W
T32 R01W
T31 R02W
T29 R05W
T30 R01W
T29 R01W
T30 R04W T30 R03WT30 R05W
T32 R03W
T31 R04W T31 R03WT31 R05W
T32 R05W
T31 R05E
T30 R06E
T29 R04WT29 R04E
T28 R05E
T33 R01ET33 R01W
T32 R03E
T30 R02W
T33 R02WT33 R04W T33 R03W
T29 R01E T29 R06E
T28 R06E
T32 R04E
T33 R05W
T29 R02E
T28 R04E
T31 R06E
T27 R06E
T29 R03W
T33 R02E
T30 R07E
T32 R05E
Creighton
Ponca
Hartington
Crofton
Santee
Bloomfield
Allen
ColeridgeBazile Mills
St. Helena
Newcastle
Wynot
Magnet
MaskellFordyce
Center
Waterbury
Obert
Martinsburg
LegendWell Interference 2012TownshipCity BoundariesCounty
2012 Reports of Well Interference in the Lewis and Clark NRD
Figure 2.
_̂
_̂ _̂_̂
_̂_̂
_̂
_̂_̂_̂
_̂
_̂
_̂_̂ _̂
_̂_̂
_̂_̂
_̂
T32 R01E
T30 R03E
T29 R05E
T31 R01E T31 R02E
T30 R01ET30 R04E T30 R05E
T30 R02E
T31 R03E T31 R04E
T32 R02ET32 R04W T32 R02W
T31 R01W
T32 R01W
T31 R02W
T29 R05W
T30 R01W
T29 R01W
T30 R04W T30 R03WT30 R05W
T32 R03W
T31 R04W T31 R03WT31 R05W
T32 R05W
T31 R05E
T30 R06E
T29 R04W
T29 R04E
T28 R05E
T33 R01ET33 R01W
T32 R03E
T30 R02W
T33 R02WT33 R04W T33 R03W
T29 R01ET29 R06E
T28 R06E
T32 R04E
T33 R05W
T29 R02E
T28 R04E
T31 R06E
T27 R06E
T29 R03W
T33 R02E
T30 R07E
T32 R05E
0304 02 0501 04 0306 11
11
01
11
11
03
1111
11
11
05 04 0302
11
1111
01
11
02
11
11
11
06
11
11
11
11
11
11
11 11
11
11
0605
11
11
02
11
11
11
11
24
07
13
0304
05
04
19
09
30
01
06
17
25
04
07
18
08
11
07
05
19
06
04
14
03
19
02
18
11
19
07
04
03
10
24
06
13
18
04
2903
13
06
34
31
23
24
31
32
15
33
04
30
34
13
13
02
36
30
13
36
1201
27
30
24
03
17
08
31
18
25
36
08
29
31
26
35
03
05
02
08
18
31
25
02
08
21
33
24
18
30
07
35
29
32
18
02
29
10
10
09
34
07
27
25
18
05
26
04
33 34
04
28
28
07
27
10
09
07
14
24
25
28
19
12
33
08
0304
19
24
09
05
13
16
12
19
19
24
02
05
03
26
0505
08
13
13
16
09
28
32
29
25
29
32
05
25
24
13
24
07
2833
18
29
34
26
05
03
09
31
04
12
02
04
32
12
35
01
18
03
32
26
28
1002
05
09
2425
30
30
24
28
09
17
12
35
33
25
25
33
35
08
36
04
09
27
05
09
27
18
04
27
25
02
28
33
33
30
01
28
32
32
29
36
08
25
10
17 14
3632
31
31
36
3424
26
28
32
13
32
35
02
24
31
31
09
23
03
36
15
02
12
35
27
32
33
02
15
35
36
24
28
12
25
22
13
26
31
25
08
01
17
27
29
13
32
08
19
29
03
24
30
04
13
12
04
36
36
09
20
29
35
03
27
12 10
12
13
18
27
28
34
10
30
28
32
16
1313
31
34
03
34
05
33
26 27
12
33
29
10
28
05
28
33
13
33
26
13
04
25
32
08
04
05
16
09
07
31
32
33
26
01
25
24
36
13
29
29
1212
10
28
13
33
34
01
08
26
34
28
33
13
25
34
29
32
09
29
15
26
36
34
34
2415
27
2827
36
26
01
05
3235
08
36
01
33
24
25
27
27
03
32
34
30
16
33
36
3425
27
30
09
29
31 32
29
09
08
04
09
35
36
28
13
26
3332
26
10
17
35
25
26
26
30
33
35
09
32
24
01
30
36
19
12
34
03
21
29
12
0810
12
10
262929
14
25
27
01
3432
26
29
32
03
35
01
05
10
34
26
28
28
09
25
32 02
34
24
04
33
20
13
32
06
28
2934
1908
28
34
33
18
04
27
2834
27
05
2833
32
09
10
25
26
14
12
24
08 10
03
35
10
05
21
10
19
25
28
0910
03
32
05
19
07
3133
36
25
01
29
32
34
30
34
08
02
08
35
01
01
08
35
14
08
1008
1309
09
35
3632
24
12
24
01
29
13
36
2829
32
32
08
35
3635
29
10
33
34
01
10
27
18
10
27
19
12
24
1201
06
36
33
10
33
06
13
08
31
33
06
35
13
36
12
28
06
28
12
36
05
10
24
32
23
08
09
35
25
26
06
08
33
24
27
3633
34
18
09
3234
05
33
09
04
29
36
13
08
35
24
33
13
34
29
30
12
09
3428
24
14
09
13
32
08
36
35
25
26
16
30
08
01
29
28
09
01
04
35
26
07
24
12
24
19
33
35
28
32
02
09
30
3506
31
08
24
05
28
36
13
27
0135
13
31
16
02
29
31
33
07
15
08
12
05
26
12
03
27
10
02
35
34
27
04
13
12
23
27
19
34
13
35
3322
18
0532
27
25
06
27
36
01
26
04
29
2535
33
33 31
18
10
14
24
28
35
36
36
19
18
26
12
25
10
26
19
19
18
36
02
06
07
09
25
36
26
35
35
3531
19
10
07
36
24
34
09
09
26
10
30
25
25
04
33
30
35
10
13
07
29
10
05
18
24
01
31
29
04
09
29
27
06
08
24
23
35
34
04
07
06
18
25
3506
19
06
25
26
12
13
25
32
07
04
09
32
12
02
17
36
18
06
13
10
02
19
13
0106
04
31
04
12
05
34
01
05
03
36
34
24
2636
04
35 0203
31
17
03
27
30
24
08
0232
12
30
19
32
06
02
33
31
19
08
02
23
13
03
29
06
02
13
31
0131
30
07
01
30
31
03
18
02
19
19
01
31
06
30
31
20
18
06
03
07
19
0306 0510
18 19
30
31
17
07
01
01
25
05
34
12
18
1818
05
18
31 31
30
24
19
0902
0807
19
18
02
03
30
31
31
31
30
18
30
27
22
02
22
04
19
31
03
30
15
07
06
07
34
31
05
30
30
27
05
30
07
07
07
18
31
07
06
34
18
07
19
19
19
18
07
07
31
06
07
31
30
0606
18
30
07
18
0205
04
06
03
20
07
07
0604
18
30
18
19
18
3019
06
06
31
07
19
06
18
06
30
1930
19
18
03
14
18
07
18
07
11
29
15
20
2228
22
20 22
20
23
28
20
14
20
15
16
2316
14
23
22
21
26
1514
21
26
2127
14
30
21
22
16
22
22
21
23
17
23
16
16
17
2023
20
23
23
20
20 21
17
09
18
33
15
21
23
20
2120
17
14
20
28
04
20
23
23
27
15
26
20
21
17
15
19
22
23
23
16
21
16
20
16
16
2221
172217
14
05
17
17
20
21
2221
22
17
22
17
17
26
2123
20
17
15
17 14
17
15
15
17
15
23
16
1415
08
17
15
19
14
16
14
2216
27
22
21
22
21
21
16
22
21
2322
23
16
14
14
14
21
16
21
15
14
22
23
17
16
22
14
21
16
14
20
23
20
17
16
16
23
15
17
22
17
21
16
17
25
29
23
15
12
21
23
1715
20
20
21
14
22
29
18
2220 22
15
21
15
20
15
22
20
28
17 22
20
222122
21
29
16
17
20
09
22
17
20
20
23
23
27
15
17
16
27
1515
16
23
25
23
26
15
21
21
16
22
17
17
23
16
22
16
31
07
14
21
23
28
20
35
15
14
08
16
14
26
16
23
14
22
14
14
20
23
21
17
20
16
15
15
29
20
16
16
36
16
20
14
20
14
15
31
22
15
15
20
14
2222
23
1621
21
21
23
17
20
23
3224
14
17 14
30
1615
17
17
21
14
19
23
18
10
3236 31
06
07
27
0807Santee
St. Helena
Lindy
Wynot
Obert
Ponca
Allen
Center
Magnet
Crofton
MaskellFordyce
Newcastle
Coleridge
Waterbury
Creighton
Hartington
Bloomfield
Martinsburg
Bazile Mills
Knox Cedar
Dixon
FIGUREPRELIMINARY SUBAREA DELINEATION MAPLewis and Clark Natural Resources District
Northeast, Nebraska
PROJECT: 013-0132
DRAWN BY: RD
DATE: August 14, 2013
M:\a
rcg
is\O
lsso
n G
IS F
iles\
Fig
1 -
Pre
lim S
ubar
ea D
elin
eatio
n v1
0.m
xd U
ser:
asu
dbec
k
±Sources:Hillshade - Developed from DNR DEM 2.5 0 2.5 5 7.5
Miles1:316,800
4
Legend
_̂ City
NRD Boundary
County Boundary
Area with Limited Aquifer Development Potential
Township
Section
First Aquifer Encountered
Missouri River Alluvium
Undifferentiated Sandstone, Sand and Gravel
Bedrock (Niobrara)
Bedrock (Dakota)
Attachment – A Excerpts from: Bazile Groundwater Management Area Plan Developed for the: Lewis and Clark Natural Resources District Lower Niobrara Natural Resources District Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District Upper Elkhorn Natural Resources District May 2013
Groundwater Quality Concerns An area of concern was identified in the late 1980s as a result of affected municipal wells in the vicinity of the Villages of Brunswick, Creighton, Orchard, Osmond, Plainview, Royal, and Wausa in northeast Nebraska (Figures 1 and 2) The area lies in three counties: Antelope, Knox, and Pierce and parts of four NRDs: Lewis and Clark (LCNRD), Lower Elkhorn (LENRD), Lower Niobrara (LNNRD), and Upper Elkhorn (UENRD). The area was deemed the Bazile Triangle due to the Bazile Creek drainage in the center. It should be noted surface water drainage in the area also includes the North Fork Elkhorn River and Verdigre Creek. In 1990 the Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska published results from a study of the Bazile Triangle area of concern. The conclusions of the report indicated the aquifers appeared to be contaminated to varying degrees and the source was likely related to fertilizer application and irrigation practices. The report also concluded there was insufficient data to implement a specific groundwater management strategy (UNL 1990). In the years since the study was completed, the NRDs continued to collect data and information on the groundwater nitrate concentrations. Average nitrate concentrations remain a concern with the recent readings being illustrated in Table 1.
Figure 1.
Table 1.
Table 1 iconcentraand showcomparisdata poin
. Bazile Grou
Average Nit
is a simple reation change
w an increaseson of the dants, and perio
undwater M
trate Concen
NRD
Lewis and Lower ElkLower NioUpper Elk
eporting of tes is providee in the averaata from NRDod of record
anagement A
ntration by N
D
Clark khorn obrara khorn
the latest infoed in Figure 3age nitrate cD to NRD isdiffer.
Area Locatio
NRD in Bazil
Year
2010 2005 2009 2010
ormation. A3. Trend lin
concentrations not appropr
on in Nebras
le Groundw
Average NConcentr
18.25 m11.84 m8.24 m13.6 m
Another illusnes have beenns for the periate as the q
ska.
ater Manage
Nitrate ration mg/l mg/l
mg/l mg/l
tration of thn included wriod of recorquantity of w
ement Area
e average niwith the charrd. A direct
wells sample
itrate rts
ed,
Figure 2.
Groundwimprovemaggressivthe resulttopograpsupply m As indicadevelopeand approquantity district wdifferenc
. Bazile Grou
water managements are nove actions takts. Rechargehy, and the d
may be the re
ated previoued, subjectedoved by the and quality c
were allowedces in the pla
undwater M
ement plans ot being achiken to reduce rates from depth to grousult of nitrog
usly, each NRd to public re
State, accorconcerns and
d to tailor theans that will
anagement A
in each NRDieved as quicce nitrates inthe surface tundwater. Ngen applied
RD has a groeview and coding to the Nd meets the me plans to adbe discussed
Area
D have beenckly as desirn the water suto the aquife
Nitrate contaseveral year
oundwater momment, adoNGM&PA. minimum stdress the locd later.
n implementered. It shoulupply requirer vary greatamination curs or even de
management opted by the Each plan a
tatutory requcal needs and
ed; unfortund be noted th
re multiple ytly due to soiurrently obseecades ago.
plan. Each NRD board
addresses botuirements hod situations.
nately, hat even
years to realizil types,
erved in the w
plan was , and reviewth groundwa
owever each There are
ze
water
wed ater
Figure 3. Average Annual Nitrate Concentrations in the Area of Concern by NRD
Each NRD has expressed interest in developing a master plan for the Bazile area on which future projects or other actions will be based. Municipalities in the area also are interested stakeholders in the process as drinking water providers for the perspective entity. In order to develop a master plan, a community based planning process was utilized whereby all stakeholders had an opportunity to identify concerns and work collaboratively with technical advisory agencies to make decisions that will protect and restore groundwater quality of the area. For the purposes of this master plan, the area will now be known as the Bazile Groundwater Management Area. The expanded area encompasses 756 square miles as shown in the subsequent figure 2.
0
5
10
15
20
25
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
LCNRD
0
5
10
15
20
25
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
LENRD
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
LNNRD
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
UENRD
Goals and Objectives Project goals and objectives were developed by the advisory council with assistance from the technical advisors. The water quality objectives listed in the goals are based on being able to reduce the nitrate concentration in the groundwater to below10 mg/l and achieve reductions that will allow the NRDs to step back into lower groundwater management phase triggers. It is realized that nitrate contamination of groundwater does not occur as rapidly as surface water and a reduction in pollutant concentrations may not be realized rapidly as well. Because of this both short and long term goals and objectives were developed. In developing the plan, the interaction between surface water and groundwater was recognized and considered. The goals and objectives primarily focus on groundwater however, the advisors included goals for groundwater quantity and surface water and if necessary the plan will be modified during one of the evaluations. Short Term Goals – 5 years Goal 1: Educate landowners, agricultural producers, commercial properties and residents on the importance of environmental stewardship and good ground water quality.
Objective 1: Inform 100% of landowners and producers in the BGMA about available opportunities to improve their operation and water quality through one on one contact. Objective 2: Inform 100 % of communities on efforts available to protect their public water supplies Objective 3: Inform 100% of the crop consultants, fertilizer dealers and others about water quality of the area and the potential impacts to agriculture production. Objective 4: Provide information to commercial operations about water quality of the area and the opportunities to improve operations. Objective 5: Educate domestic groundwater users on the current status of the local aquifer.
Goal 2: Reduce the trend of increasing nitrate concentrations within the BGMA.
Objective 6: Reduce average nitrate concentrations in the BGMA by 3.2 mg/l. Objective 7: Reduce and maintain nitrate concentrations below 10 mg/l in all wellhead protection areas for public water supplies Objective 8: Increase vadose zone monitoring and utilize information for management decisions
Long Term Goals– 20 years Goal 3: Reduce and maintain groundwater nitrate concentrations to below the maximum contaminant level of 10 mg/l.
Objective 9: Reduce average nitrate concentrations in the BGMA to below 10 mg/l. Objective 10: Reduce and maintain all areas of the BGMA to 9.0 mg/l or below (Figure 13). Objective 11 Reduce and maintain all areas of the BGMA to the respective NRD’s Phase II and/or I nitrate concentrations
Goal 4: Maintain an adequate and sustainable supply of groundwater to provide sufficient quantities for domestic, municipal, agricultural and industrial uses. Objective 12: Manage groundwater usage to avoid over use and excessive aquifer depletions Goal 5: Ensure groundwater contamination and other activities do not impair surface water beneficial uses. Objective 13: Introduce and implement practices that protect surface water quality. Actions and Tasks The advisory council identified several Action Items that will facilitate meeting the project goals. The Action Items listed below will be periodically reviewed and revised as the implementation of the plan progresses. It should be noted all of the activities are specific to the BGMA.
1. User Education – to be completed within five years of plan approval a. Prepare bi-annual mailings explaining the groundwater concerns, best management
practices (BMPs), cost share programs, etc. b. Issue periodic news releases c. Hold a minimum of three meetings, workshops or seminars to further educate producers d. Initiate one-to-one contact with producers to facilitate the implementation or further
implementation of BMPs. e. Educate communities in the area on the benefits of wellhead protection management
planning 2. Soil Sampling
a. Require annual soil sampling for any crop (including turf grass) where >50 lbs per acre per year of organic or inorganic nitrogen will be applied.
i. Each sample will only be representative of 40 acres. ii. Sampling depths will be 0-8” and 8”- 24”
iii. Producers are encouraged to sample 24”- 48” b. Each soil sample must include a cation exchange capacity and organic matter analysis c. It is recommended NRDs provide cost share
3. Irrigation Water Sampling a. Irrigation water will be sampled every other year
i. Irrigation water users are encouraged to sample water annually b. It is recommended NRDs provide cost share
4. Water Well Flow Meters a. Each operator is required to have at least one irrigation system flow meter installed b. Larger operations (>10 systems) will be required to have at least one meter installed per
10 existing systems (i.e. 11 systems will require two flow meters) c. All new and replacement wells will be required to install a flow meter d. Meters must be installed within five years of plan approval e. NRDs should develop a meter inspection program
5. Soil Moisture Sensors and Irrigation Scheduling a. Each operator is required to install and utilize at least one soil moisture sensor for
irrigation scheduling b. Larger operations (>10 irrigation systems) will be required to have installed and use at
least one soil moisture sensor per 10 wells (i.e. eleven systems will require two sensors) c. Implementation should be completed within five years of plan approval
6. Fall Fertilizer Application a. No nitrogen fertilizer (organic or inorganic) shall be applied post harvest to November 1. b. Surface applied organic nutrients will be exempted from this if the application is in
compliance with future cropping needs and a nutrient management plan. Figure 13. Historic Data and Short and Long Term Nitrate Reduction Goals
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
Nitrate Concentration (mg/l)
BGMA Mean Groundwater Nitrate Concentration
20 Year
7. Winter Application a. Nitrogen fertilizer applications to frozen or snow covered ground will not be allowed
without district permission 8. Manure Applications
a. All manure applied will be based on a nutrient analysis b. Require applicator to uniformly apply organic nutrients. c. Application equipment should be maintained and calibrated
9. Crop Tissue Analysis a. Each producer will be required to complete one growing season tissue analysis and one
late season stalk nitrate test within five years of the plan approval 10. Split Fertilizer Applications
a. Split application of nitrogen fertilizer will be required where the soil cation exchange capacity is <10.
b. In soil types where the cation exchange capacity is >10, one-to-one contact with producers should be undertaken to increase split applications on 50% of the BGMA
11. Fertilizer application through irrigation system (fertigation) a. Work with producers to achieve 90% of corn producers utilizing fertigation b. NRD are encouraged to provide cost share
12. Nitrification Inhibitors a. Encourage the use of nitrification inhibitors through education
13. Variable application and precision farming a. Create a partnership with local fertilizer distributors and crop consultants to create
demonstration field(s) b. Demonstrations will include nitrification inhibitors; growing season tissue analysis and
late season stalk nitrate test c. Demonstration fields should incorporate multiple BMPs including no-till, cover crops,
etc. 14. Nitrogen Budgeting/Accounting
a. Require producers to document nitrogen requirements and usage for all fields where >50lbs per acre of nitrogen is applied.
b. NRDs are encouraged to utilize a common reporting form or other form that contains the required information
15. Sub-surface Irrigation a. Work with a sub-surface irrigation system distributor to establish one demonstration field
that includes the usage of a fertigation system 16. Irrigation Well Rehabilitation
a. Implement water well construction standards that protect confined layers b. Work with the Nebraska Water Well Standards Board to conduct a well rehabilitation
demonstration. 17. Vadose Zone Sampling
a. The NRDs will establish baseline vadose zone nitrate conditions and conduct periodic re-assessments including the 10 and 20 year time frame
18. Areas of Significant Concerns a. The NRDs will monitor the progress of the actions and tasks undertaken and where
necessary increased management will be undertaken which may include regulatory actions.
Monitoring and Evaluation Groundwater quality data and information is needed to determine whether or not the management plan is effective at reducing groundwater nitrate concentrations. Each NRD annually collects groundwater quality data from multiple wells within the BGMA. During the
initial phases of the plan implementation, a representative well network will be developed and utilized to determine the changes in groundwater nitrate concentrations. Groundwater quality data and information will be collected annually. Additionally, vadose zone nitrate concentrations will be collected and utilized to assess the potential threat to groundwater and the impacts of the implementation of best management practices. As resources allow, the NRDs will be encouraged to make use of analytical methods to identify sources (organic and inorganic) of nitrogen. Such data and information will be invaluable when determining the appropriate BMP to implement. Changes in groundwater quality are often not realized as quickly as surface water and therefore the short and long term goals are based on ten and twenty year time frames, respectively. Evaluation of the plan will include the following:
Annually meet to assess the progress of the implementation of the action items and adjust plan where necessary
2018 – determine if BMPs and other activities identified in action items have been completed 2022 – determine if short term goal are being met 2032 – determine if long term goals are being met
Information and Education Educating producers is one step in protecting and improving groundwater quality. One of the primary goals of this project will be to increase the usage of best management practices for irrigation and nitrogen management through one-on-one contact with producers in the NRD.
Publish the information (charts, graphs, etc) in the NRD’s newsletters. Present the information annually to the NRD’s Board of Directors at a public meeting. Continue to integrate the information into the current nitrogen and irrigation management
workshops. Utilize the NRD web sites to distribute information Prepare and distribute news releases to media within the NRDs and surrounding areas. Cooperate with UNL Extension Educators to distribute information about the project.
Utilize multi-media outlets to advertise the BGMA activities and follow-up with success stories.
Attachment – B Excerpts from:
Evaluation and Assessment of Agrichemical Contaminants in the Creighton, NE Area
Final Report for the Lewis and Clark Natural Resources District
July 20, 2000
Mark E. Burbach, Dr. Roy F. Spalding
University of Nebraska Lincoln, Water Sciences Laboratory
CONCLUSIONS
A large plume of non-point source nitrogen from agronomic sources (commercial-N
and fertilizer-N) lies immediately east-southeast of Creighton, NE.A golf course, abandoned
gravel pit, and fertilizer plant do not appear to be significant contributors to the N03-N in the
ground water upgradient of the Creighton municipal wells. The N03-N in this plume exceeds
the MCL for drinking water and is impacting the city of Creighton municipal wells as well as
numerous private drinking water wells. A portion of the plume is also migrating to the
northwest towards the village of Bazile Mills. A zone underlying approximately 830 ac has a
N03-N concentration exceeding 30 mg/L. The leading edge of this area is approximately 1.25
miles downgradient of the city of Creighton municipal wells and is well within the estimated
20-year travel period to the municipal wells. However, a discharge area between the leading
edge and the municipal wells
.may in part intercept this part of the plume. Nitrate analyses of vadose zone cores indicate a significant amount of N03-N
continues to leach through the sediments beneath irrigated com fields in the study area. This
will cause N03-N concentrations in the ground water to remain the same or continue to
increase in the near
future.
The city of Creighton reverse-osmosis treatment system can currently reduce 13 mg/L
N03-N in well water by 80%. To meet demand, treated water is blended with untreated water
for a final N03-N concentration in the municipal water supply system of 5-7 mg/L. If the N03-
N concentration in the municipal wells increases in the future more water will need to be
treated before entering the final water supply. This may cause the city to fail to meet demand.
With the exception of extremely low concentrations of deethylatrazine , no other
pesticides were detected in ground water from monitoring well clusters. Nitrogen isotope
values confirm that the source of nitrogen in the majority of wells in the study area is derived
predominately from commercial fertilizer sources. Deuterium values confirm that the source
of recharge to the ground water in the study area is derived from precipitation and not
impacted by surface water bodies. Chloride and sulfate values are slightly elevated in some
portions of the study area.