6073836-Black-Man-Created-All-Other-Races

8/7/2019 6073836-Black-Man-Created-All-Other-Races

1/5

Black Man Created All Other RacesPosted: October 10, 2001An analysis by

Dr. Kwame Nantambu

It is quite clear that any human that had its birth in Afrika could not have survived inan equatorial region without pigmentation. According to Senegalese scientist,

deceased Dr. Cheikh Anta Diop (pronounced Jop), the world's modern-day multi-genius or Imhotep, since nature does not do anything by chance, then humankind

that was born in a sub-equatorial region was given melanin to protect its skin fromthe hot rays of the sun.

For this reason, it is certain that the first man had to be a BLACK man.

It is only after that Black race left Mother Afrika to people other parts of the world

that had different climate conditions that that original Black man changed and tookon different aspects or physical characteristics.

He acquired a different look as a result of his migration. Indeed, scientific evidencesuggests that nature created six specimens of man before we get to man as we know

him today.

According to this evidence, it appears that the first three of these species never

acquired the potential to leave Afrika. Three others did leave Afrika.

The fourth and fifth of these species disappeared. What remains is man as we knowhim today B that is, the sixth species. The fifth species did not have a forehead; the

eyes were situated very close to the top of the head.

However, the brain inside this species was very different from the brain of mantoday. He did not have the anterior lobe of the brain. That's the major difference

between Homo sapiens sapiens B what we are today and the fifth specimen.

This species was never able to overcome nature to an extent that he was able tocreate works of art.

The sixth species was a BLACK man who in pre-historic history is called Grimaldi

man. He is the man whom we are today.

Between 40,000 and 20,000 years ago, this BLACK man left Mother Afrika and wentinto Father Europe at a time during the last glaciazation. The climate in Europe was

extremely cold; it was much colder than it is now and during this period of some20,000 years, this BLACK man underwent significant physical adaptations to

eventually become what we call or know today as the WHITE man.

This original BLACK man had to adapt or adjust to his new cold environment.

In other words, this BLACK MAN DID NOT need his sun-required melanin in this cold

environment. He lost that. He DID NOT need Black skin in this cold environment. Helost that.

He DID NOT need his sun-required broad nose, large, thick lips and hair in this new


2/5

cold environment. His environmental adaptation caused him to loose all of theseAfrikan physical features. As a result, his nose had to contract and become thin and

narrow so that the cold could not enter, his lips also became thin and the colour andthickness of his hair had to change.

He thus became WHITE to survive in his new cold climatic surroundings. However, a

more vital adaptation took place.

In his original Afrikan form, this human man was in-tuned with nature but in his

derived European human form, he became anti-nature as a result of 20,000 years

spent in the ice cold caves during the Ice Age. According to Dr. Diop, it is very clearto all the scientists in this field that the man we know conventionally today to be a

White man evolved from a Black man over a period of some 20,000 years ofadaptation to a different climate.

That is the only scientific conclusion at which to arrive. If this sixth specimen has

never left Afrika to people in other parts of the world and if those people in otherparts of the world in different climates had not through the process of adaptation

become what they are in various regions of the world, all humankind would be

homogenous and all humankind would be BLACK.

If that sixth species, that Black man, had not left Mother Afrika then the rest of the

world would be just a desert; it would never have been peopled.

The bottom-line is that the first man was BLACK and it was he who gave birth toother races of the world.

In terms of human anthropology, there are two theories in regard to the origin of

man.

They are first; the monogenetic theory which contends that man was born in one

place and subsequently became different as he migrated to populate other parts ofthe world. There is only one source for the origin of humankind.

The second is the polygenetic theory, which suggests that man was born in Africa

and also in Europe and Asia. In other words, there are different and several sourcesor locations for the origin of humankind. Africa is just one of them but NOT the

primary one. At face value, the polygenetic theory may seem to make a lot of sense

but under very strict scientific scrutiny and analysis, it quickly falls apart andcollapses just like a deck of stacked Euro-centric, racist, supremist cards.

There are two basic flaws in this theory; namely first, nature never creates the same

being twice or it never strikes twice in its evolution.

Second, in the animal kingdom, throughout the evolution of animals, a being wascreated and it either disappeared or changed somewhat or a new being was created

completely.

The same being was never created twice. And if we are to remain strictly scientific, itdoes not make common sense to say that man was created twice.

This is total circular reasoning which does not even compute in the arena of historical

sanity.


3/5

In Kenya, the most ancient evolutionary information of humankind is found and it is

for this reason scientists can state with certainty that man can only have beencreated one time.

All fossils that were found outside Mother Afrika have only been found much recently

compared to those found in Afrika.

In fact, no other Continent contains the complete set of the six human species of

man but Afrika.

The only species that appears in America is that Homo sapiens sapiens. America was

peopled through the Bering Strait at the end of the final glaciazation and it is only forthat reason we find only Homo sapiens sapiens in America.

In Asia, we have Homo erectus, Neanderthal man and Homo sapiens. In Europe, we

have Homo erectus, Neanderthal man and Homo sapiens. Through their migrationprocess from Mother Afrika to populate and civilise the rest of the world, the original

Afrikans used the Suez Canal or the Isthmus of Suez to go into Asia and Eastern

Europe or the Straits of Gibraltar to the north into Europe.

It must be borne in mind that the polygenetic or polycentric theory seeks to establish

a hierarchy among races and to indicate that some races are superior to others.

This theory thus represents European anthropological supremacy at its racist zenith.

This is all part of the manifestation of "the evil genius of Europe" in their attempt tomaintain, perpetuate and strengthen their global power control intent.

In sum, the polygenetic theory represents the Euro-centric thought process in its

geo-politically coded, multi-diversified supremist context.

It seeks to deny Afrika and Afrikans of any sense of human originality.

It suggests that Mother Afrika and Afrikans cannot stand-alone; we need a European

or Asian connection or imprimatur to make us legit. Indeed, history of humankindtotally rejects this European racist and supremist master-plan.

It must be understood that within the context of European global supremacy, Asiansare regarded, treated and respected as "honorary Whites" or "quasi Europeans".

In the United States of America, they are regarded, treated and respected as

"probationary Whites".

On the contrary view, if man has the same origin then, of course, there can be nointellectual hierarchy because all the three races of the world have the same

intellectual ability and capacity.

If the three races had different origins then one can argue that they had differentintellectual capacity as a result of having a different intellectual history.

The polygenetic theory is essential to defend the position that there must be

inequality between races.


4/5


5/5

This theory rejects the slightest notion of Afrikan superiority; it only proves the

Afrikan human originality in Mother Afrika.

It does not represent reverse supremacy.

The monogenetic theory coincides with the reality that in real life, there is only oneoriginal life to live, not three as the polygenetic theory contends.

Furthermore, in the musical arena, there is only one original master copy, not three;

in real life, a child has only one original mother and father, not three.

Afrikans are the original peoples with original ideas; we are the global majority.

Every human being on this planet, whether European, Asian, Chinese, Syrian, Indian,Portuguese or even "Dougla" is derived from the original Black, Afrikan race.

Shem Hotep

Dr. Nantambu is an Associate Professor, Dept. of Pan-African Studies, Kent StateUniversity, U.S.A. a Public Policy versus Human Needs

Documents

6073836-Black-Man-Created-All-Other-Races