5th MAHAMANA MALAVIYA - WordPress.com MAHAMANA MALAVIYA NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION - 2017. PAGE NO. 3 FACULTY OF LAW, BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY 3.5 The Hard Copyof Demand Draft

5th MAHAMANA MALAVIYA

NATIONAL MOOT COURT

COMPETITION - 2017.

Organised By

FACULTY OF LAW,

BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY

5th MAHAMANA MALAVIYA NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION - 2017.

PAGE NO. 1 FACULTY OF LAW, BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY


National Moot Court Competition-2017.

Faculty of Law, BHU, Varanasi

25th & 26th March, 2017.

1. GENERAL:

1.1 ADMINISTRATION: The ‘5th Mahamana Malaviya National Moot Court

Competition, 2017’, is to be organised and administered by Faculty of Law, Banaras Hindu

University, Varanasi.

1.2 DATE: - The Competition shall be held on 25th March, 2017 and 26th March, 2017 at

the Law School (Faculty of Law), Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh-

221005.

1.3 LANGUAGE: - The official language for the Competition shall be English only.

1.4 STRUCTURE OF THE COMPETITION: - The Competition shall consist of a

Researcher’s Test, Two (2) Preliminary Rounds, the qualification for which is on First

come-First serve basis and three (3) Advanced Rounds viz. Quarter-Finals, Semi-Finals and

Finals.

1.5 DRESS CODE: - All the participants are required to adhere to the following dress code

while their present in any court room during the Competition:

i. Girls: - Black and White Western Formals.

ii. Boys: - Black and White Western Formals.

RULES AND REGULATIONS



2. PARTICIPATION AND ELIGIBILITY:

2.1 ELIGIBILITY: - Students pursuing Three (3) Year or Five (5) Year Courses of LL.B. Degree

in the Academic Year 2016-2017 from any recognised Law School/College/University in

India or abroad are eligible to participate.

2.2 Each participating University shall send only One (1) Team to the Competition. Team

members must be bonafide students of the University they are representing. Once

registered (after Final Registrations), a Team will not be permitted to vary their

composition in any manner.

2.3 TEAM COMPOSITION: - The participating team shall comprise a minimum of two (2)

and a maximum of three (3) members. In a team of two (2) members, both the members

shall be designated as ‘Speakers’ and one of the two Speakers shall be considered as

‘Researcher’ (which is to be notified at the time of Final Registrations). In a team of three

(3) members, two members shall be designated as ‘Speakers’ and the third member of

the team shall be designated as a ‘Researcher’. The Organizing Committee reserves the

Right to bar any team from participating in the Competition.

3. REGISTRATION:

3.1 Interested teams are required to register themselves by filling up the form so provided

and subsequently mailing it to [email protected] with the subject “Provisional

Registration for 5th Mahamana Malaviya National Moot Court Competition 2017”,

latest by 15th February, 2017.

3.2 On receiving the Provisional Registrations, the first 24 teams to send their forms shall be

provisionally registered, subject to arrival of the hard copies of their form and draft.

3.3 Interested teams must confirm their participation through an e-mail, latest by 18th

February, 2017 by sending scanned copy of Registration Form and Demand Draft of Rs.

2500 (Two Thousand Five Hundred Rupees only) drawn in favour of ‘5th Mahamana

Malaviya National Moot Court Competition’, payable at State Bank of India, B.H.U.

Branch, Varanasi. The subject of the mail must read “Registration for 5th Mahamana

Malaviya National Moot Court Competition 2017.”

3.4 Once the relevant documents in the hard copy form are received, your registration

process is deemed to be complete.



3.5 The Hard Copy of Demand Draft along with the Registration Form and Travel Plan (which

shall be mailed to you once the soft copy of your documents is received) must reach the

following address: Convener, Mahamana Moot Court Competition, Law School (Faculty

of Law), Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221005 by 25th February, 2017.

3.6 After receiving the Hard Copies as mentioned in Rule-3.5, the process of registration shall

be deemed to be completed and teams would be allotted a ‘Team Code’ which will be

notified to them through an e-mail.

4. MEMORIAL PARTICULARS:

4.1 MEMORIAL SUBMISSION:

4.1.1 Each team participating in the Competition must prepare one Memorial on behalf of

Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)/Applicant(s) and one on behalf of the

Defendant/Respondent(s).

4.1.2 Each team must send the soft copies of each side of Memorials (One (1) in MS Word

.doc/.docx format and One (1) in .pdf format) for evaluation by 15th March, 2017

before 11:59 P.M. to [email protected] with the subject “[Team Code]

Memorial for Appellants/Respondents”. The file names of the electronic copies of

the Memorials must contain only the Team Code and the side being represented in

the following format: [Team Code] - Memorial for [The Applicable Side]. For example,

“Team Code A-14 – Memorial for Appellant”.

4.1.3 Memorials submitted beyond the deadline shall incur a liability of 04 Marks for each

day of delay. However, teams submitting soft copies of memorials any time after 19th

March, 2017 will be subject to immediate disqualification. No further extensions will

be granted with respect to this deadline.

4.1.4 Each team has to submit Six (6) Hard Copies for each side of the Memorial, which must

be reach the following address: Convener, Mahamana Moot Court Competition, Law

School (Faculty of Law), Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221005 before 22nd

March, 2017.

4.1.5 Memorials submitted will be evaluated according to Rule 4.4.



4.1.6 Applicants may take note that Soft and Hard Copies of the Memorials submitted by

them should be identical. Any discrepancy in this regard would result in immediate

disqualification from the Competition.

4.2 MEMORIAL FORMAT:

4.2.1 All the pages of the Memorial must be of A4 Size with equal margin on each side.

4.2.2 The text font for the ‘Main Body’ must be Times New Roman, Size 12, with 1.5 Line

Spacing. The text font for the ‘Footnotes’ must be Times New Roman, Size 10, with

1.0 Line Spacing. Character Spacing should not be condensed in any manner. Margins

should be 1 Inch on each side.

4.2.3 Footnotes must not be explanatory in nature.

Illustrative example of an acceptable footnote: A v. B, AIR 1973 SC 22, 23-24

[hereinafter X].

Illustrative example of an unacceptable footnote: A v. B, AIR 1973 SC 22, 23-24

[hereinafter X] (holding that the Right to Information Act was in fact against the

express provisions of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India).

4.2.4 Teams shall cite authorities in the Memorial using footnotes following the Harvard

Bluebook 19th Edition and the footnoting must be uniform throughout the

Memorandum.

4.2.5 The Memorials shall be ‘Spiral Bound’. The following colour scheme shall be followed

for the Cover Page of the Memorial:

Petitioner: Blue

Respondent: Red

4.3 MEMORIAL CONTENT:

4.3.1 The Memorials shall necessarily consist of only and only the following sections:

(a). Cover Page;

(b). Table of Contents;

(c). List of Abbreviations;

(d). Index of Authorities (with Page Number where the authority has been cited);

(e). Statement of Jurisdiction;



(f). Statement of Facts (not exceeding 2 Pages);

(g). Arguments Presented (Statement of Issues);

(h). Summary of Arguments (not exceeding 2 Pages);

(i). Arguments Advanced (not exceeding 20 Pages);

(j). Prayer (not exceeding 1 Page).

4.3.2 Each Memorial shall have the following and only the following on its cover page:

(a). The Team Code on the upper right hand corner of the Cover Page;

(b). The Name and Place of the Forum;

(c). The relevant legal provision under which it is filed;

(d). Name of parties and their status;

(e). Memorial Filed on Behalf of ____.

4.4 EVALUATION:

The maximum score for each Memorial shall be 100 points. The memorials shall be

evaluated on the following criteria:

Knowledge of Law and Facts 25 Points

Proper and Articulate Analysis 25 Points

Extent and Use of Research 20 Points

Clarity and Organization 20 Points

Grammar and Style 10 Points

4.5 PENALTIES:

Not following the instructions regarding Memorials in these Rules will lead to the

following penalties -

Late Submission 04 Marks each day (disqualification after

4 days).

Exceeding Page Limits 01 Mark per exceeding page.



Failure to include the required

information on the Cover Page 01 Mark per violation.

Failure to comply Footnote

standards, Font Size, Font Style,

Line Spacing, Margins

0.50 Marks per violation.

Failure to use correct Colour

Coding 02 Marks per Memorial.

5. STRUCTURE OF THE COMPETITION:

5.1 RESEARCHERS’ TEST:

a. The Researchers’ Test shall be conducted on 24th March, 2017 from 06:00 pm to

07:00 pm.

b. Every Team member designated as the Researcher has to be present at the time of

the Researchers’ Test. If a Researcher does not participate in the Researchers’ Test,

their team shall cease to be a contender for the Best Researcher Prize.

c. The test shall contain questions related to the Moot Proposition and the relevant laws

applicable.

5.2 ORAL ROUND PROCEDURES:

A. General Procedures:

a. The teams shall be seeded into Six (6) Groups on the basis of their reporting at the

Registration-Desk on the Date of Competition.

b. The Memorials shall be exchanged after the Registration on 24th March, 2017.

c. There shall be two Preliminary Rounds, a Quarter-Final Round, a Semi-Final Round

and a Final Round. If the number of teams participating is less than twelve, there shall

be no Quarter-Final Round.



d. Two (2) members, and no more than Two (2) members, from each Team shall make

Oral Pleadings during the Rounds.

e. Prior to the beginning of the Oral Rounds, each Team shall inform the Court Officers

how it wishes to allocate their time. e.g., For the Preliminary Rounds, how the 20

minutes allotted to the Team would be allocated among (a) its First Speaker, (b) its

Second Speaker, and (c) Rebuttal (by Plaintiff) or Sur-rebuttal (by Defendant). No

single Speaker shall plead for more than twelve (12) minutes, excluding the time for

rebuttal.

B. Procedures for Oral Submissions:

a. Each team will get a total of 20 minutes (in Preliminary and Quarter-Final Rounds) and

30 minutes (in Semi-Finals, and Final Rounds), to present their case. This time will

include Rebuttal and Sur-rebuttal time (if permitted by the judge(s)).

b. The Applicants/Petitioners/Appellants shall submit their arguments first followed by

the Respondents. Thereafter, the Applicants/Petitioners/Appellants shall have the

option of submitting rebuttals.

c. The division of time per speaker is left to the discretion of the team subject with a

minimum of 6 minutes per speaker (in Preliminary and Quarter-Final Rounds) and 12

minutes per speaker (in Semi-Final and Final Rounds).

d. Rebuttals can be assigned a time period of not more than 2 minutes (in Preliminary

and Quarter-Final Rounds) and 3 minutes (in Semi-Final and Final Rounds).

e. The oral arguments should be strictly confined to the issues presented in the

memorial. The researcher may sit with the speakers during the orals.

f. Maximum scores for the oral rounds shall be 100 points per speaker per judge.

g. The speakers can provide the copies of the compendium, only if the same is permitted

by the panel of judges in their respective court rooms.

h. The oral rounds shall be judged on the following criteria:



Knowledge of Law: 20 Points

Application of Law to Facts: 20 Points

Ingenuity and Ability to Answer to Questions: 20 Points

Style, Poise, Courtesy and Demeanour: 20 Points

Time Management: 10 Points

Organization and coherence of the argument: 10 Points

5.3 Preliminary Round:

a. The Preliminary Rounds are scheduled to take place on 25th March, 2017.

b. There shall be two (2) Preliminary Rounds. All the selected Teams will be participating

in the Preliminary Rounds.

c. The Bench constituted for the Preliminary Rounds shall consist of at least two Judges.

No Teams shall face the same Bench more than once in the Preliminary Rounds.

d. The Teams shall be arguing on each side during the Preliminary Rounds.

e. No two teams shall face each other more than once in the Preliminary Rounds.

f. For the purposes of qualification from the Preliminary Rounds to the Quarter Finals,

the number of rounds won by the team shall be considered as the first criteria. The

second criteria shall be the total marks of both the speakers. In case of persisting tie,

the team with better combined memorial score will qualify for the Quarter-Finals.

5.4 Quarter-Final Round:

a. The Quarter-Final Rounds are scheduled to take place on 25th March, 2017.

b. Total of Eight (8) Teams shall proceed to the Quarter-Final Rounds from the

Preliminary Rounds, which shall comprise of four (4) matches.

c. In the Quarter-Final Rounds, each Team shall argue on the side as decided on the basis

of draw-of-lots.



d. The Quarter-Final Rounds shall be in the nature of knock-outs, i.e., the team with the

lesser score shall be evicted.

e. The Winning Teams in each of the four Quarter-Final matches shall advance to the

Semi-Final Rounds.

5.5 Semi-Final Round:

a. The Semi-Final Rounds are scheduled to take place on 26th March, 2017.

b. The Winning Teams in each of the Quarter-Finals shall compete according to the draw-

of-lots.

c. In the event that Quarter-Finals are not required to be held, the top four Teams shall

proceed to the Semi-Final Rounds. For that purpose, the condition mentioned in 5.3

(f) shall apply.

d. The Winning Team from each of the two Semi-Final Rounds shall advance to the Final

Round.

5.6 Final Round:

a. The Final Round is scheduled to take place on 26th March, 2017.

b. For the Final Round, the Teams shall argue on the side as decided by the draw-of-lots.

c. The Winner of the Final Round (i.e., the team obtaining a Higher Score in the verbal

arguments) shall be adjudged as the winner of the competition.

NOTE: Use of any Electronic Gadgets is strictly prohibited during the course of

Researcher’s Test and Oral Rounds. Non-Compliance to the Rules shall leads to immediate

disqualification.

6. SCOUTING:



Teams shall not be allowed to observe the Oral Rounds of another team, unless they have

been officially knocked-out of the Competition. Scouting is strictly prohibited. Scouting by

any team shall result in disqualification.

7. ADHERENCE TO ANONYMITY:

7.1 During the Oral Rounds participating teams are supposed not to state their names or the

names of the Institution to which they belong and instead must use the Team Code

allotted to them.

7.2 The team shall not disclose their identity anywhere in their written Memorials and instead

should use the Code allotted.

7.3 Failing any of the condition stipulated above shall result in immediate disqualification of

the team. Decision of the Organizing Secretary in this regard would be final.

8. AWARDS:

8.1 Winners Trophy & Prize

8.2 Runner-Up Trophy & Prize

8.3 Best Memorial Trophy

8.4 Best Researcher Trophy & Prize

8.5 Best Student Advocate Trophy & Prize (To be judged on the basis of the preliminary round

marks only.)

9. LOCAL HOSPITALITY:

9.1 Accommodation shall be provided to all teams by the Organisers from the evening of 24th

March, 2017 to the evening of 26th March, 2017.

9.2 Teams who intend to arrive prior to or leave after the specified dates are required to

inform the Organizing Committee in advance.

9.3 Food and Transportation to and from the venue shall be provided to all the teams for the

aforementioned duration and it shall be strictly limited to 03 Members per team.



10. ANY CLARIFICATIONS REGARDING THE COMPETITION CAN BE

SOUGHT FROM:

Regarding Travel and Accommodation:

Mr. Mayank Pratap, Moot Court Committee (Tel: +919919312701)

Mr. Pratyush Pandey, Moot Court Committee (Tel: +917376748533)

Regarding any other query or help:

Dr. Anil Kumar Maurya, Moot Court Committee (Tel: +919695014000)

Mr. Anurag Pandey, Moot Court Committee (Tel: +919559229163)

NOTE:

All clarifications regarding the Moot Problem should be sent to [email protected] by

22nd February, 2017. A full list of clarifications shall be sent to all the teams through email by 25th

February, 2017, if required.

Organising Committee:

Patron: Prof. G. C. Tripathi, Vice-chancellor, Banaras Hindu University

Convener: Prof. D. K. Sharma, Head & Dean, Faculty of Law, BHU

Organising Secretary: Prof. R. K. Murali

Joint Secretary: Mr. Mayank Pratap, Dr. Anil Kumar Maurya

Treasurer: Dr. Raju Majhi




National Moot Court Competition - 2017.


25th & 26th March, 2017.

1. Scindia, a nation worth a population of more than a billion people lies in the southern region of

Asia. The country has a rich history and has seen a huge upsurge in development in the recent

times. The development spans across multiple sectors. One such sector is Information

Technology which has picked up pace due to multiple initiatives taken by the Central Government

in the recent years. The country has a varied demography spread across urban and rural living

conditions, sometimes even in the extremes. Thus, Information Technology has spread its reach

in a non-uniform manner, although with the recent steps taken by the Government, the people

of the nation have begun to accept it into their lives, replacing their orthodox methods which

they had been habitual of. Owing to the growing inculcation of Information Technology across

the country, multiple institutes have come up to impart the knowledge of this relatively new

branch of study. However, a few of the universities in the country had been the pioneers of in

the field of IT in the country, boasting of recognition on a global level.

2. Raghvan Dutta and Karan Bansal are two Scindian nationals who recently obtained their

bachelor’s degree in Cyber Law and Information Security from the renowned Scindian Institute

of Information Technology (SIIT). Both the boys were exceptionally bright and were considered a

prodigy, particularly when it came to finding loopholes in cyber security. They had had an

eventful time in their college, their journey blotted only by a stray incident of disciplinary sanction

when their attempt at breaking into the University’s Cyber Network was dealt with strictly. The

duo, however, passed with flying colours and found themselves eligible for the highly appreciated

Scindian Institute of Cyber Security (SICS) for their post graduate program, which they applied

for, and were selected upon clearing the required interview.

3. Scindia has entered into an international treaty under which each participating nation is required

to submit a review of cyber security practices adopted in its integral national functions and any

MOOT - PROPOSITION



upgrades that a nation may have made in its cyber security mechanisms to bring it at par with

the suggested international standards. The Convention aims to improve the international

scenario of cyber security measures adopted by all of its participant nations. This year, the

responsibility of preparing the draft of the review had been awarded to the SICS, the institute

being of national repute and importance and having the requisite command over the subject

matter. The institute worked in close correspondence with certain designated officials of the

Government, to facilitate the preparation of the said draft and to provide to SICS, the information

it might require.

4. The Scindian Space Research Organisation (SSRO) is the space agency of the Government of

Republic of Scindia headquartered in Periyana, a state in the southern part of the country, with

a vision to "harness space technology for national development", while pursuing space science

research and planetary exploration. In March 2016, the SSRO, in the wake of the recent events

of cyber-attacks on multiple websites of national importance, had decided to take extensive

measures to secure its online presence. Thus, after a substantial upgrade of its existing cyber

security mechanism, it released a public notification announcing a reward of 1,00,000 in its

national currency to anybody who could find vulnerabilities in their security mechanism. Those

interested were required to fill an online form hosted on a third-party website and subsequently

pay an online fee of 500 in the national currency after which they were to be allotted a Unique

Participant Code (UPC) by way of which they would be identified and be able to claim the prize,

as the case may be. Thousands of people reportedly applied for the competition but were unable

to circumvent the Organisation’s security measures put into place. The contest was subsequently

announced closed on August 31st, 2016.

5. Raghvan along with Karan, during their initial year at the SICS, had applied for the competition in

the month of June, 2016 to try and find a loophole in SSRO’s security. Although the upgraded

system proved to be too foolproof for them and they could not succeed in their attempt.

However, they had continued to modify their method of attacks and were expectant of a positive

result on their end. On the second Sunday of October 2016, the duo decided to give their old

endeavour another shot and tried a multi-vector attack on the servers of SSRO. One of their

multiple modus operandi in this attack was to introduce a self-programmed virus through an e-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_agency

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_government

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_government



mail which, when accessed, was programmed to make its way into the servers of SSRO and

facilitate the success of the multi-vector attack, launched from the outside by the two.

6. This method of attack became successful and the duo gained access to SSRO’s servers on the said

date. However, once the breach was successful, the virus began to behave in a manner not

foreseen by the perpetrators of the attack. It affected multiple websites hosted by the SSRO and

began to make innumerable copies of the extremely confidential data that had been housed

inside the servers. Raghvan and Karan, monitoring this breach from their end, noticed this

unprecedented behavior of the virus and were alarmed. Their test runs with the virus had only

showed them that the virus was capable of facilitating multi-vector attacks and taking down the

websites hosted on the infected server.

7. Faced with an unforeseen behavior of their program which they now knew would land them in

the midst of extremely dire circumstances, they sent out an anonymous mail, addressed to the

SSRO, containing the coding of the virus and every other detail they thought would be helpful in

terminating the attack. However, because the servers at SSRO had been clogged, this message

did not get through until it was too late. Multiple websites hosted on the servers had stopped

showing up and the SSRO servers had become jammed. Following this, emergency response to

the attack was triggered and the servers at SSRO shut down to prevent further damage.

8. Following the reboot of the servers and the restoration of order, the mail which had been sent

anonymously by the two was received and tracked by way of the IP address, which directed the

Authorities to Raghvan Dutta and Karan Bansal, both of whom were subsequently arrested and

charged under Sections 66, 66F of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and

Section 441 of the Scindian Penal Code. The Ld. Sessions Court, upon perusing the facts and the

evidence on record, concluded that there was a clear lack of intention on the part of the Accused

and thus, they were acquitted under all of the charges labeled against them.

9. The State filed an appeal against the Ld. Sessions Court’s verdict in the High Court of Periyana.

The High Court, in its judgement stated that the mere access by the two of them was an access

without authorization and that the breach of confidentiality of the files was deemed sufficient to

find the two guilty under the charged sections. The judgement of the Sessions Court was thus



reversed and Raghvan Dutta and Karan Bansal were found guilty under Sections 66, 66F of the

Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Section 441 of the Scindian Penal Code.

They have now approached the Supreme Court of Scindia.

10. Voice of Netizens is a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) registered under the relevant Act

of the country. The Organisation has an eventful history, and has often been in the news for

standing up to the Government for the basic rights of the people while on the Internet. The NGO

believes that any arbitrary law restricting free speech on the internet is a bane, often leaving the

affected people in a position from where they are unable to raise a voice against the oppressive

laws.

11. The Organisation observed that a number of detentions across various states of the country had

been made using Section 66F of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, for

offences ranging from serious acts such as compromising the security of the State to acts of

defamation or contempt of court, comparatively less in their seriousness. The blanket usage of

this provision, across offences so vastly varied in their severity, was viewed as a glaring

transgression of the rights of the people in the latter cases. Perturbed over the growing number

of such incidents, Voice of Netizens decided to file a Public Interest Litigation before the Supreme

Court of Scindia challenging the constitutional validity of the said provision.

12. The petition was admitted before the Apex Court and was clubbed with the matter of Mr. Dutta

and Mr. Bansal, the Court believing that it was imperative to decide the constitutionality of

Section 66F of the IT Act in order to administer justice to the matter concerning the SSRO. The

matter is therefore pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of Scindia.

13. All the relevant laws of Scindia are pari materia to those of India.




National Moot Court Competition-2017.


25th & 26th March, 2017.

(Please fill this form using capital letters to ensure legibility.)

INSTITUTION DETAILS

Name ____________________________________________________________________.

Contact No. (Faculty Co-coordinator) ________________________________________.

Email ____________________________________________________________________.

TEAM DETAILS

Speaker 1:

Name ____________________________________________________________________.

Contact No. ______________________________________________________________.

Email _____________________________________________________________________.

Speaker 2:

Name ____________________________________________________________________.

Contact No. _______________________________________________________________.

Email ____________________________________________________________________.

REGISTRATION FORM



Researcher:

Name ____________________________________________________________________.

Contact No. _______________________________________________________________.

Email ____________________________________________________________________.

Contact Person:

(A member of the team with whom all Competition related communication shall be

made.)

Name ____________________________________________________________________.

Contact No. _______________________________________________________________.

Email ____________________________________________________________________.

REGISTRATION FEE:

Please find enclosed, the Demand Draft No. ________________________________ dated

_________________________ in favour of ‘5th Mahamana Malaviya National Moot Court

Competition’, payable at BHU, Varanasi for Rs. 2,500/- (Rupees Two Thousand Five

Hundred only) as the registration fee for the 5th Mahamana Malaviya National Moot Court

Competition.

(Signature and Seal of the Head of Institution)




National Moot Court Competition - 2017.


25th & 26th March, 2017.

Release of Problem Saturday, February 5, 2017.

Deadline for Provisional Registration Wednesday, February 15, 2017.

Deadline for submission of soft copy of Registration Form, Demand Draft and

Travel Form Saturday, February 18, 2017.

Deadline for submission of hard copy of Registration Form, Demand Draft and

Travel Form Saturday, February 25, 2017.

Deadline for seeking clarifications Saturday, February 25, 2017.

Release of final clarifications (if any) Tuesday, February 28, 2017.

Deadline for submission of soft copy of Memorials

Wednesday, March 15, 2017.

Deadline for submission of hard copy of Memorials

Wednesday, March 22, 2017.

Inauguration Ceremony Saturday, March 25, 2017.

Researchers’ Test Friday, March 24, 2017.

Oral Rounds Saturday-Sunday, March 25-26, 2017.

Valedictory Ceremony Sunday, March 26, 2017.

TIMELINE

Documents

5th MAHAMANA MALAVIYA - WordPress.com MAHAMANA MALAVIYA NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION - 2017. PAGE NO. 3 FACULTY OF LAW, BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY 3.5 The Hard Copyof Demand Draft