82
D.Caroline Mohamed 07/07/2013 1 D Caroline Mohamed

5.Gingival and periodontal indices.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • D.Caroline Mohamed

    07/07/2013 1 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Outline of lecture Description of normal gingiva

    Gingival index by silness and loe

    OHI index simplified

    CPITN index

    07/07/2013 2 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Remembering gingiva anathomy

    07/07/2013 3 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 4 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 5 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 6 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Characteristics of normal gingiva

    07/07/2013 7 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 8 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 9 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 10 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 11 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Characteristics of gingivitis

    07/07/2013 12 D Caroline Mohamed

  • How do we know there is a problem?? DIAGNOSIS

    Individual complaine

    Clinical examinations

    Radiographic examination

    07/07/2013 13 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Individual complaine Bleeding gums Red gums

    Blood on my pilow

    Bad taste

    Bad smell (halitosis)

    Smokers ....less bleeding

    07/07/2013 14 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Clinical examinations

    Plaque index

    Gingival index

    Pocket measurment

    Furcation

    Tooth mobility

    07/07/2013 15 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Gingival index of loe and silness The most frequently used index for evaluating

    gingivitis.

    It is possible to measure

    bleeding tendencies

    color, contour changes of the gingiva

    alternations in the consistency of tissue

    and the presence of ulcerations.

    07/07/2013 16 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Steps..

    The gingival condition around each tooth is examined, and a score for the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual areas is recorded.

    If desired, the gingival index can also be used on only selected teeth in the mouth.

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 17

  • Bleeding is the most important criterion of inflammation in this index; however, the distinction between normal {0} and mild inflammation {l} is based on visual appearance of the tissues

    The intensity of probing with a blunt instrument must be carefully controlled.

    The basic intention of this index is not to assess the depth or extent of a pocket or to determine bone loss but only to evaluate the status of gingival health.

    07/07/2013 18 D Caroline Mohamed

  • D Caroline Mohamed 19

    Mesio-facial

    Disto-facial

    Buccal

    Lingual

    Buccal

    Mesial Distal

    Palatine or lingual

  • Gingival Index: GI

    0 1 2 3

    07/07/2013 20 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Appearance Bleeding Inflammation Points

    normal no bleeding none 0

    slight change in color

    and mild edema with

    slight change in

    texture

    no bleeding mild 1

    redness,

    hypertrophy, edema

    and glazing

    bleeding on

    probing/pressu

    re

    moderate 2

    marked redness,

    hypertrophy, edema,

    ulceration

    spontaneous

    bleeding

    severe 3

    Gingival Index Le & Silness 1963

    07/07/2013 21 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 22

    Training What is the gingival index of this

    tooth?

  • 0 normal

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 23

  • 07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 24

  • 0 normal

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 25

  • 07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 26

  • 2 bleeding on probing/pressure

    moderate

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 27

  • 07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 28

  • marked redness, hypertrophy, edema, ulceration

    spontaneous bleeding

    3

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 29

  • 07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 30

  • 2

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 31

  • 07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 32

  • 3

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 33

  • Gingival Index Method

    Six index teeth

    16; 12; 24; 36; 32; 44

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 34

    6 2 4

    4 2 6

  • Gingival Index Calculation GI for a tooth:

    Scores for the four areas of the tooth are added and then divided by four

    GI for the individual:

    Indices for each of the teeth are added & then divided by the total of number of teeth examined

    GI for a group:

    Indices for each member of a group is added up & then divided by the total number of individuals in the group.

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 35

  • GI FORMULA

    GI ( tooth) = scores M+D+B+L

    4

    GI ( individual ) = GI each teeth added

    N. of teeth

    GI ( group) = GI each individual added

    N. of individuals

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 36

  • Training Youve just assessed Omars gingival situation and filled

    his chart now give me his gingival index.

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 37

    Gingival Index Tooth

    Sum of scores of each tooth divided for 4:

    15 ( M=3; D=2;B=1; P=0) /4=

    12 ( M=1; D=2; B=3; P=1) /4=

    11 ( M=0; D=1; B=0;P=1) /4 =

    21 ( M=0; D=1; B=3; P=0) /4=

    24 ( M=1; D=2; B=3; P=1 ) /4=

    33 ( M=1; D=2; B=3; L=2) /4=

    GI individul= Scores each tooth added

    N. Teeth

  • Training Youve just assessed Omars gingival situation and filled

    his chart now give me his gingival index.

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 38

    Gingival Index Tooth

    Sum of scores of each tooth diveded for 4:

    15 ( M=3; D=2;B=1; P=0) 6/4=1.5

    12 ( M=1; D=2; B=3; P=1) 7/4= 1.75

    11 ( M=0; D=1; B=0;P=1) 2/4 = 0.5

    21 ( M=0; D=1; B=3; P=0) 4/4=1

    24 ( M=1; D=2; B=3; P=1 ) 7/4=1.75

    33 ( M=1; D=2; B=3; L=2) 8/4=2

    GI individual= Scores each teeth

    N. Teeth

    Omars GI= =1.5+1.75+0.5+1+1.75+2 6

    Omars GI= 8.5 = 1.4 6

  • Omars gingival index is = 1.4.

    What does it mean?

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 39

  • Average

    Gingival Index

    Interpretation Patient

    evaluation

    < 0.1 no inflammation Healthy

    0.1 - 1.0 mild inflammation Mild gingivitis

    1.1 - 2.0 moderate

    inflammation

    Moderate gingivitis

    2.1 - 3.0 severe

    inflammation

    Severe gingivitis

    Gingival Index Le & Silness 1963

    07/07/2013 40 D Caroline Mohamed

  • It means that Omar has moderate inflammation/ gingivitis ( 1.1 to 2.0)

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 41

  • Oral hygiene index (OHI) Greene, Vermillion, and Waggener,

    The OHI of Greene and Vermillion has two components,

    the debris index ( DI)

    and the calculus index, ( CI)

    It is an indication of

    oral cleanliness.

    The term oral debris include plaque, materia alba and food remnants.

    07/07/2013 42 D Caroline Mohamed

  • The scores may be used singly or in combination.

    For scoring, the clinician divides the dentition into sextants and selects the facial (or buccal) and lingual tooth surface in each sextant that is covered with the greatest amount of debris and calculus.

    Twelve surfaces, therefore, will be evaluated.

    For this index, a surface includes half the circumference of the tooth.

    07/07/2013 43 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Debris Index

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 44

  • How to proceed? Each tooth is dried and examined visually using a mirror,

    an explorer, and adequate light.

    The explorer is passed over the cervical third to test for the presence of plaque.

    A disclosing agent may be used to assist evaluation.

    07/07/2013 45 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 46 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Criteria for classifying debris Silness and Loe

    Score Criteria

    0 No debris or stain present

    1 A film of plaque covering the

    tooth or soft debris covering

    not more than 1/3 of the tooth

    surface, or presence of

    extrinsic stain without other

    debris regardless of surface

    area covered

    2 Moderate accumulation of

    soft deposits in the gingival

    pocket or on the tooth. Soft

    debris covering more than 1/3

    but not more than 2/3 of the

    exposed tooth surface

    3 Soft debris covering more

    than 2/3 of the exposed tooth

    surface or abundance of soft

    matter within the pocket 07/07/2013 47 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Training Give me the right debris score:

    07/07/2013 48 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 3

    07/07/2013 49 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 50 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 0

    07/07/2013 51 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 52 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 1

    2

    07/07/2013 53 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 54 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 3

    07/07/2013 55 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 56 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 1 3

    2

    07/07/2013 57 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 58 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 3

    1

    07/07/2013 59 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 07/07/2013 60 D Caroline Mohamed

  • 0

    07/07/2013 61 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Criteria for classifying calculus

    Scores Criteria

    0 No calculus present

    1 Supragingival calculus covering not more than 1/3

    of the exposed tooth surface

    2 Supragingival calculus covering more than 1/3 but

    not more than 2/3 of the exposed tooth surface or

    the presence of individual flecks of subgingival

    calculus around the cervical portion of the tooth or

    both

    3 Supragingival calculus covering more than 2/3 of the exposed tooth surface or a continuous heavy

    band of subgingival calculus around the cervical

    portion of the tooth or both 07/07/2013 62 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Training

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 63

  • Training

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 64

    3 1

    3

    0

    0

    2

    3

    1

  • To help to memorize....

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 65

  • ORAL HYGIENE INDEX SIMPLIFIED Greene and Vermilion

    One of the most popular indicators for determining oral hygiene status in epidemiologic study

    Greene and Vermillion have also developed a simplified OHI in which the clinician measures only one tooth surface in each sextant, equaling only six surfaces. ( 6 rather than 12)

    07/07/2013 66 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Selection of tooth surfaces

    Six Index surfaces are examined:

    The buccal surface of the upper 1st molars ( 16, 26)

    The lingual surfaces of the lower 1st molars ( 36, 46)

    The labial surface of the upper right central incisor (11 )

    The labial surface of the lower left central incisors ( 31)

    16 11 26

    46 31 36

    07/07/2013 67 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Calculating OHI-Simplified DI-S = Buccal total score + Lingual total score

    N. of segments scored

    CI- S = Buccal total score + Lingual total score

    N. of segments scored

    Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) = D I-S + C I-S

    OHI-S Value ranges from 0 to 6

    07/07/2013 68 D Caroline Mohamed

    Good 0.0 to 1.2

    Fair 1.3 to 3.0

    Poor 3.1 to6.0

  • Sign the worse score FOR debris

    index and Calculus index (WHO, pathfinder methods, 1993).

    07/07/2013 69 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Oral hygiene index-s

    Advantages:

    It takes less time to score.

    It is easy to score.

    It is useful in survey work

    Disadvantages:

    Results are biased

    The index is not sensitive.

    It is not ideal for clinical trials {Research}.

    07/07/2013 70 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN)

    Developed by Russell, the PI determines the periodontal disease status of populations in epidemiologic studies. Each tooth is scored according to the condition of the surrounding tissues.

    It can be based solely upon clinical examination, or it can make use of Xrays.

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 71

  • CPITN index

    Indicators. Three indicators of periodontal status are used for this assessment:

    presence or absence of gingival bleeding

    supra- or subgingival calculus

    periodontal pockets-subdivided into shallow (4-5mm) and deep (6mm or more).

    07/07/2013 72 D Caroline Mohamed

  • CPITN probe

    A specially designed light weight probe with a 0.5-mm ball tip is used, bearing a black band between a 3.5 and 5.5 mm from the ball tip.

    07/07/2013 73

    D Caroline Mohamed

  • Sextant The mouth is divided into

    6 sextant defined by the teeth number

    A sextant should be examined only if there are two or more teeth present and not indicated for extraction.

    When only 1 tooth remain in a sextant it should be included in the adjacent sextant

    Upper right

    posterior

    18-14

    Upper

    anterior

    13-23

    Upper left

    posterior

    24-28

    lower right

    posterior

    44-48

    Lower

    anterior

    33-43

    lower left

    posterior

    38-34

    07/07/2013 74 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Teeth to be examined For adults aged 20 years and over, the teeth to be examined are: The

    2 molars in each posterior sextant are paired for recording, and if one is

    missing, there is no replacement.

    If no index teeth or tooth is present in a sextant qualifying for examination, all the remaining teeth in that sextant are examined

    For young people up to the age of 19 years, only six teeth 16,11,26,36,31 and 46 are examined

    For children under 15 recording for pocket should not be attempted. ie., only bleeding and calculus should be considered

    If no index tooth is present in a sextant qualifying for examination, single fully erupted incisor or premolar may be substituted

    17 16 11 26 27

    47 46 31 36 37 07/07/2013 75 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Sensing gingival pocket The sensing force used should be no more than 20 gms

    A practical test for establishing this force is to place the probe point under he thumb nail and press until blanching occurs

    For sensing sub gingival calculus, the lightest force that will allow movement of the probe ball point along the tooth surface should be used

    The depth of insertion read against the colour coding.

    At least 6 point on each tooth should be examined: mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal, and the corresponding lingual sites.

    07/07/2013 76 D Caroline Mohamed

  • When non-index teeth are examined, the highest score found in the sextant is recorded in the appropriate box.

    If there are not at least two teeth remaining and not indicated for extraction in a sextant, the appropriate box should be cancelled by a cross ( x ).

    07/07/2013 77 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Examination and recording. The incisor and either the first molars (up to 19 years) or the pairs of first and

    second molars (above 19 years) should be sensed and

    the highest score recorded in the appropriate box.

    07/07/2013 78 D Caroline Mohamed

  • Scoring criteria for Russels ( CPTI) 0: normal

    l: bleeding observed, directly or by using mouth mirror,

    after sensing

    2: calculus felt during probing but all the black area is

    visible

    3: pocket 4 or 5 mm (gingival margin situated on black

    area of probe

    4: pocket > 6 mm (black area of probe not visible)

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 79

  • CPTIN Score Criteria for field studies

    Additional X ray criteria

    Treatment Needs

    0 Healthy. Neither overt inflammation nor loss of

    function caused by the

    destruction of supporting

    tissue is noted

    Radiographic appearance

    normal

    No need for treatment

    1 Mild Gingivitis. Overt inflammation in the free

    gingiva is present, but

    does not circumscribe the

    tooth.

    -------------------------------- TN 1 .Need to improve individual OH. Require

    OHI nstructions

    2 Gingivitis. Inflammation surrounds the tooth, but

    there is no apparent break

    in the epithelial

    attachment

    --------------------------------- TN2. Patient needs OHI and Professional cleaning.

    Pockets of 4 to 5 mm

    needs Scaling an root

    planning

    6 Gingivitis with pocket formation. The tooth is not

    mobile in the socket and

    not drifted.

    Horizontal bone lost

    involving the entire

    alveolar crest, up to half of

    the length of the tooh root(

    distance from apex to

    cementoenamel junction)

    TN 3. Needs of complex

    treatment ( deep scaling,

    efficient personal OH

    measures)

    8 Advanced destruction with loss of function. The tooth

    may be loose or drifting. It

    may sound dull on

    percussion and may be

    depressible in the socket.

    Advanced bone loss,

    involving more than half of

    the length of the tooth root

    or a definite intrabony

    pocket with definite

    widening of the

    periodontal membranes.

    Therre may be root

    resorption, or rarefaction

    of the apex.

    . // 07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 80

  • Scores for each tooth are added, and the total divided by the number of teeth examined. Scores can be interpreted

    as follows:

    0-0.2: Clinically normal supportive tissues.

    0.3-0.9: Simple gingivitis.

    0.7-1.9: Beginning destructive periodontal disease.

    1.6-5.0: Established destructive periodontal disease.

    3.8-8.0: Terminal periodontal disease.

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 81

  • Thank you

    07/07/2013 D Caroline Mohamed 82