View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 1© 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 1
Cape Cod Human Resources Association
You and Your Business: Cost-Cutting Strategies and Legal Considerations
During a Recessionary Economy
June 25, 2009
Presented by Katherine A. Hesse & Thomas W. Colomb
Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 2
The Recessionary Economy: Where Are We?
Recession by many accounts started in December 2007
Heavy effects on business Decreased access to capital Declining value of assets Some costs still rising (e.g., health care)
What are some legal strategies to help business deal with the financial pressures of the recession?
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 3
Strategy: Cutting Costs While Minimizing Legal Risk
Financial Discipline – Make smart choices about where to cut costs Do not fail to make required tax payments Do not use employee 401k or health deductions for business
purposes Renegotiate Existing Contracts
Leases Vendor contracts (pricing, terms (e.g., time to pay, interest rate
on delayed payments)) Credit card rates Payroll Costs Insurance Coverage
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 4
Strategy: Negotiation Options
Everything is negotiable Prioritize Be realistic – Don’t be overly optimistic nor unduly
pessimistic Have goals and strategies in mind from the start, but be
flexible Think about what the other party needs
What do you bring to the table? How can you make it mutually beneficial?
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 5
Example: Real Estate Lease
Rent – Reduction in rate? Term – Consider an extended term? Scope – Consider opportunity to buy out at discounted
rate? Subleasing options? Purchase or expansion options? Reallocation of responsibility for or deferral of
maintenance and repairs? Personal guarantees? Pass through charges?
Also consider common area charge audit.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 6
The Recessionary Economy
Job Losses at the National,
State and Local Level
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 7
Employment: National*
Unemployment rose from 8.9% in April 2009 to 9.4% in May
14.5 million unemployed in May 2009 – up 787,000 from April
7.0 million jobs lost between December 2007 and May 2009 – unemployment rate almost doubled, rising 4.5% in same period
“Involuntary part-time workers” currently 9.1 million (up 4.4 million since December 2007)
* All statistical information in this presentation drawn from published reports by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Massachusetts Department of Workforce Development, Division of Unemployment Assistance.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 8
Employment: National, cont.
Widespread losses across major industry sectors: Steep losses continue in manufacturing Rate of decline moderating in construction,
professional/business services, retail Health care has added approximately 25k jobs/month in
2009
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 9
Employment: Massachusetts
Unemployment rose to 8.2% in May 2009 from 8.0% in April 2009 (May 2008 Mass. Unemployment at 4.9%)
4,900 Jobs added in May 2009 – First monthly increase since May 2008 and largest monthly increase since January 2008
Sectors gaining jobs in May 2009: Professional, Scientific and Business; Education and Health; Leisure and Hospitality; Financial; Trade and Transportation (in order of gain)
Sectors losing jobs in May 2009: Construction; Government; Manufacturing; Information (in order of loss). Losses in manufacturing and information are modest and reflect smaller monthly declines. (Information down 6.3% from one year ago; Manufacturing 5.4% from one year ago)
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 10
Employment: Massachusetts, cont.
Massachusetts Regional Unemployment April 2009*
Boston/Cambridge/Quincy unemployment consistently below state average (6.7% vs. 8.0% in April 2009)
Brockton/Bridgewater/Easton unemployment consistently above state average (8.8% vs. 8.0% in April 2009)
(Town of) Barnstable unemployment above state average (8.4% vs. 8.0% in April 2009)
* Comparisons made using April 2009 data. Regional data for May 2009 will be released June 30th.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 11
Local Unemployment Rates( ) = Seasonally Adjusted Rate; All Other Rates are Unadjusted
Dec 2007 May 2008 Dec 2008 Jan 2009 May 2009
National 4.8 (4.9) 5.2 (5.5) 7.1 (7.2) 8.5 (7.6) 9.1 (9.4)
Mass. 4.3 (4.5) 4.8 (4.9) 6.5 (6.4) 8.1 (7.4) 8.0 (8.2)
Barnstable 4.6 4.2 7.5 10.2 7.3
Bourne 5.2 5.3 7.8 10.1 8.5
Brewster 4.6 4.0 7.2 10.3 6.6
Chatham 4.6 4.5 7.5 11.0 6.7
Dennis 5.9 4.7 9.4 12.4 7.3
Eastham 6.5 4.8 10.1 12.9 8.2
Falmouth 4.5 4.5 7.1 9.5 6.7
Harwich 5.8 5.0 9.2 13.1 8.1
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 12
Local Unemployment Rates( ) = Seasonally Adjusted Rate; All Other Rates are Unadjusted
Dec 2007 May 2008 Dec 2008 Jan 2009 May 2009
National 4.8 (4.9) 5.2 (5.5) 7.1 (7.2) 8.5 (7.6) 9.1 (9.4)
Mass. 4.3 (4.5) 4.8 (4.9) 6.5 (6.4) 8.1 (7.4) 8.0 (8.2)
Mashpee 4.6 4.8 7.9 10.0 7.5
Orleans 3.8 5.0 7.5 9.9 7.1
Provincetown 23.7 10.1 28.3 35.1 15.4
Sandwich 4.1 4.1 7.0 9.2 7.5
Truro 12.4 8.0 17.1 23.1 10.4
Wellfleet 9.8 5.6 13.8 17.7 9.2
Yarmouth 6.5 5.6 10.5 13.5 8.7
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 13
Strategy: Reducing Operating Costs Payroll and Employee Benefits
Wage Reductions Furloughs Pension/Retirement Health and Welfare/Insurance
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 14
Strategy:Reducing Operating Costs Workforce Reductions
Attrition/Hiring Freeze Exit Incentives Individual Separations Layoffs Facility/Business Closure
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 15© 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 15
Wage Reductions and Furloughs
Where permissible – May Be Prospective Only Adequate Notice Reductions or deductions in pay and pay furloughs
can cause employer to run afoul of the “salary basis” requirements, so be careful to do it right
Careful and Thorough Communications Do Not “Defer” Pay
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 16
Exempt Employees:Salary Basis Executive, Administrative, or Professional
employee Compensated on a “salary basis” ($455/week or
greater) Subject to certain permissible deductions Beware of non-permissible deductions
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 17
Other Wage and Hour Issues
Timing – Advance notice of change required Vacation Pay and Commissions as wages Payment on Separation Individual liability Mandatory treble damages Offering employees the choice between a pay
reduction and layoff - communication is key
Practice Tip: Do not defer payment of wages.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 18
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Introduction
Benefit costs may make up 25-40 % of payroll costs.
Cutting these costs is a necessity for many employers today.
What cost cutting can be done legally? Reduction/Deferral of Costs Administrative Simplification
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 19
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Different Plans – Different Rules Different rules apply to
“pension” plans (e.g., DB, DC, 401(k), 403(b), etc.) “welfare” plans (e.g., health, dental, vision, life,
STD, LTD) unfunded benefits (e.g., vacation, sick or personal
time, LOA’s) government mandated benefits (e.g., worker’s
compensation, unemployment insurance) Union plans vs. company plans Single employer versus multi-employer plans
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 20
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Pension Plans Defined benefit plans are subject to the “anti-cutback
rule”. Employers may not retroactively eliminate retirement benefits, however, future accruals may be reduced or eliminated.
Employers may not retroactively reduce or eliminate promised defined contribution retirement benefits. Future contributions may be reduced or eliminated. Mandatory employer match may be made
discretionary or eliminated.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 21
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Pension Plans, cont. Do not be tempted to “dip into” pension monies.
They must be held in trust. Deductions from employee paychecks are held in
trust as well: do not be tempted to use the “float” on 401(k) contributions deducted from employee paychecks.
Hardship withdrawal provisions are available in some plans.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 22
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Pension Plans, cont. If you take advantage of plan loan provisions in your
pension plans: Make sure any loans are documented. Make sure they bear a commercially reasonable rate of
interest. Make sure they are for the legally permissible time
period. Make sure they are paid back by payroll deduction. Beware of prohibited transaction rules for “parties in
interest.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 23
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Welfare Benefits
A general rule of thumb is that, absent a contract to the contrary, employers are free to change or eliminate welfare plans (e.g., health, dental, vision, LTD, STD, Life) prospectively upon appropriate notice to participants.
Massachusetts employers may face penalties under the Massachusetts Health Care Reform Act for elimination of a health plan. Fair Share Contribution penalty. Minimum Creditable Coverage/taxation implications for
employees.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 24
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Pension and Welfare Benefits
The regulations require that the plan and SPD specify the method in which a plan may be amended or terminated.
A formal plan amendment properly adopted by those with the authority to do so is necessary to amend or terminate the plan.
Changes to pension plans require the adoption of a plan amendment and notice to participants prior to the effective date of the change. This is also recommended for welfare plans despite regulatory wording on timing.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 25
Employee Benefits in a Recession: COBRA Continuation on Termination When an employee’s termination or reduction in
hours causes the loss of health coverage, continuation and conversion options must be offered to eligible employees under COBRA for employers with 20 or more
employees, or state law for employer with between 2 and 19
employees. Remember that state law, unlike federal law, provides continuation coverage for same sex spouses.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 26
When an employee is involuntarily terminated (except for gross misconduct), s/he and his/her qualified beneficiaries may be entitled to subsidized COBRA for up to 9 months with the employer picking up 65% of the cost until getting reimbursed through the payroll tax system if They were enrolled in the employer’s health care plan on
the date of termination and Their date of termination falls between September 1,
2008 and December 31, 2009. New COBRA notices are required - DOL has made
available on its website.
Employee Benefits in a Recession: COBRA Continuation on Termination
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 27
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Unfunded Benefits The general rule is that these benefits are at the
discretion of the employer provided the employer has not created a contractual obligation to pay them. Thus, these benefits can normally be changed prospectively upon notice. The length of a reasonable notice period will vary depending on the type of benefit.
Be careful of promises to pay contained in offer letters, employee handbooks, etc.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 28
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Employment Issues
It is unlawful to suspend, expel, discipline, or discriminate against a participant or beneficiary for exercising any right under ERISA or for the purpose of interfering with the
attainment of a benefit. Note potential ADA, ADEA claims as well.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 29
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Employment Issues, cont. A pattern of abuse under a pension plan (such as
dismissal of employees before their accrued benefits become non-forfeitable) tending to discriminate in favor of employees who are highly compensated can have adverse consequences.
Do not misrepresent availability of coverage. Do NOT fail to remit timely employee
contributions to health or 401(k) plans – this is a big focus of EBSA enforcement!
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 30
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Summary Pitfalls abound for the unwary employer
attempting to cut benefit costs, but with the proper planning and advice, dramatic cost savings can often be achieved.
Know the legal and practical restraints on your actions and their consequences before making a decision – do your homework!
Remember that you may have two roles, that of fiduciary as well as employer/plan sponsor and act accordingly.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 31
Employee Benefits in a Recession: Summary, cont. Seek qualified professional help well-versed in not
only in employment but also in ERISA, COBRA, HCR and other employee benefits issues.
Long range planning is essential to long term cost control, however significant savings can also be achieved in a short time horizon, in some cases almost immediately.
Creative benefits planning can also be used to improve morale and deal with issues created by layoffs, furloughs, etc.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 32
Workforce Reductions: Strategic Considerations What options best suit our organization, fiscally and
operationally? Pre-existing obligations (employment contracts, CBAs,
policies) What benefits/incentives can we offer (if any)? Who will be eligible for exit incentives? Timeframe WARN and/or state notice requirements Modification/enforcement of restrictive covenants
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 33
Workforce Reductions: Strategic Considerations Ensure Proper Development and Legal Review of:
Exit incentive program Discrimination issues Releases (voluntariness, consideration)
Severance program Seek legal advice regarding ERISA issues
Layoff criteria Disparate impact analysis Severance agreements/releases
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 34
Workforce Reductions:Legal Considerations
Contractual/collective bargaining issues/employer policy Potential WARN notification requirements Discrimination: disparate treatment Discrimination: disparate impact Disabled employees Employees on protected leave (e.g., FMLA, MMLA,
USERRA) Caution with “problem employees”
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 35
Legal Considerations: Disparate Impact
Disparate impact = facially-neutral layoff program that has a disproportionate adverse impact on employees in protected classification(s)
Most common claim is age or gender
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 36
Legal Considerations: Severance Agreements
Common non-economic considerations: Rehire/reinstatement References Confidentiality and non-disparagement Restrictive covenants
Unemployment Benefits “Hot Button” issues
Attorneys fees/liquidated damages “Claw-back” or “tender back” provisions – per EEOC
regulations will invalidate release of age claim
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 37
Legal Considerations: Releases A release is a contract – it can be voided if not
supported by sufficient consideration. Beware of “boilerplate” – certain claims cannot be
waived. Employer may not restrict individual’s right to file
claim, participate in investigation or provide information to administrative agencies (e.g., NLRB, EEOC, MCAD).
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 38
Legal Considerations: Releases, cont. While employee can usually agree to dismiss most
pending court cases, approval is required for dismissal of most pending agency claims (e.g., EEOC, MCAD).
Certain agencies (e.g., NLRB) have specific requirements and broad discretion to approve/reject settlements
Workers’ compensation settlements require approval of administrative judge.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 39
Legal Considerations: OWBPA Releases To obtain enforceable release of age claims under ADEA,
release must comply with all EEOC requirements. Must provide “additional” consideration. Must provide employee with 21 days to consider agreement.
45 days in connection with “exit incentive” or “program”. Employee may waive some or all of this period.
Must provide employee with 7 days to revoke agreement. This period cannot be shortened or waived.
Exit incentive: must provide information about program, including titles and ages of employees who are/are not selected or eligible to participate.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 40
Workforce Reductions: WARN Act
Employer must give union, individual employees, state and local government at least 60 calendar days notice of a covered “plant closing” or “mass layoff”.
Employees may individually waive right to the 60 day notice; union may not waive that right for them.
Payment in lieu of notice is not recognized in the statute or the regulations, but Department of Labor concedes that pay in lieu of notice “effectively precludes any [judicial] relief.”
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 41
3 Exceptions to Providing WARN Notice
1. Where employer reasonably believes that giving notice would impair its ability to get needed business or capital infusion;
2. Closure due to business circumstances that are not reasonably foreseeable; or
3. Natural disaster.
In case of exceptions, the employer must give as much notice as practicable.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 42
WARN Applies to:
Employers with 100+ full-time employees, defined as employees averaging over 20 hours/week. (Or employer with 100+ employees who work at least a combined 4,000 hours/week). WARN covers private sector employers and quasi-public entities (MWRA, for example), but does not cover governmental entities.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 43
WARN Applies to:
A. A "plant closing," where an operating unit or plant at a single site of employment is shut down and at least fifty employees suffer an “employment loss”
B. A "mass layoff," where the operating unit at the single site of employment still operates, but either (1) 500 employees, or (2) at least 50-499 employees constituting at least 33% of the workforce, suffer an “employment loss” within any 30 day period.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 44
WARN Applies to:
C. A "deemed" plant closing or mass layoff, which occurs when there have been a series of employment losses at a single site of employment involving a total of at least 50 employees who have suffered an “employment loss” over any 90 day period; these are added together, independently of any other plant closing or mass layoff that was over 50 employees, to "deem" that a plant closing or mass layoff has occurred. Beware of staggered layoffs or “winding down” operations.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 45
What is an “employment loss”?
An “employment loss” is a termination of employment, a layoff from that employer of more than 6 months, or an hours reduction of 50% or more for any 6 month period.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 46
What happens if I don’t give proper notice?
You will be liable for 60 calendar days of pay and benefits and possibly attorneys fees for failing to give notice to employees, and a civil fine of $500.00/day for failing to give notice to the local chief elected official unless back pay and benefits are paid within 3 weeks of the closing. Note that the 60 days does not begin to run until employee receipt of the notice, not when it is sent.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 47
Workforce Reductions:Massachusetts Plant Closing Requirements Plant Closing law, G.L. c. 151A, §71A-H Requires
notice to state; no notice to employees is required. Certain provisions regarding unemployment and insurance benefits for displaced workers (charged back to employer). Subject to legislative approval. Has never been funded.
“Tin Parachute” statute, G.L. c. 149, §183: Mandates severance pay for employees losing jobs due to a “transfer of control” of the company. Federal courts have held that this statute is preempted by ERISA.
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 48
Questions?
503425 © 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 49© 2009 Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane LLP. All Rights Reserved. 49
Quincy Boston Springfield
Crown Colony Plaza 75 Federal Street One Monarch Place
300 Crown Colony Drive Suite 410 1414 Main Street 1310R
Quincy, MA 02169 Boston, MA 02210 Suite 1310RSpringfield, MA 01144
Tel: 617/479-5000 Tel: 617/479-5000 Tel: 888/841-4850
Fax: 617/479-6469 Fax: 617/338-1324 Fax: 617/479-6469
WWW.MHTL.COM