5 Trade Theories

  • Upload
    vbaloda

  • View
    218

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    1/14

    TRADE THEORIES

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    2/14

    What is Trade?- Exchange ofgoods and services

    Why do we need to do trade?

    Differences in cost are the basic cause of

    trade. Every country will have goods that can

    be produced cheaper than others. This

    promotes them to export that product for

    another. Eg. UAE can produce oil while

    Japan can produce electronics and cars. Thetwo nations can trade with each other and

    both are satisfied.

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    3/14

    How does a country decide

    what to trade and with whomto trade?

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    4/14

    Adam Smiths theory of AbsoluteAdvantage-

    Simplest example- Imagine USA needs 10 workers

    to manufacture 1 helicopter but takes 20 men tobuild a luxury car.

    Germany on the other hand needs 20 workers to

    manufacture a

    helicopter while only10 workers for the car.

    Do they have anyDo they have any

    advantage to trade?advantage to trade?

    Or can they continueOr can they continue

    doing what theyve been doing?doing what theyve been doing?

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    5/14

    Theres only one logicalTheres only one logical

    decision to be made by bothdecision to be made by both

    countries-countries- US must export copters to Germany andimport cars in return! Because instead of

    wasting 20 men for making a car, they can

    make TWO copters. If US sells it to Germanythey can get back TWO CARS for the cost of

    one!

    The result is maximum productivity and profit.

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    6/14

    Every country having absolute

    advantage in the production and

    distribution of every good is not

    possible. So international trade is

    important to everyone.

    That is why when sanctions are

    imposed on our trade, it affects us

    a lot. (India, Pak, Iraq, NorthKorea)

    Trade also depends on

    relationships between nations.

    Reason why heads of state keep

    meeting other heads to discussbetter ties for the future. Eg. India

    & China, Russia, US etc.

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    7/14

    But what if a country cancanproduce all the goods it

    needs or another countrycannotcannot produce any goods at

    all.Does it mean they should notDoes it mean they should not

    and cannot trade?and cannot trade?

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    8/14

    David Ricardos ComparativeAdvantage Theory Eg. Suppose India and France are cotton and

    wine producing countries. France can

    produce 1 unit of wine with 50 man hours and

    1 unit of cotton with 60 man hours. India on the other, the cost of producing 1

    unit of wine is 100 working hours and 1 unit

    of cotton is 80 man hours.Does it make sense for France to trade with

    India?

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    9/14

    Yes, France must trade withIndia! Because if we calculate, the

    cost for France for making 1unit of wine is 50/60 and 1unit of cotton is 60/50.

    Which means 1 unit of wine

    costs 0.833 units of cottonand 1 unit of cotton costs1.2 units of wine. ForFrance cotton is moreexpensive to make thanwine.

    For India, 1 unit of wine is1.25 units of cotton. and 1unit of cotton is 0.80 units ofwine. Here wine is moreexpensive.

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    10/14

    Therefore bothcountries can benefitif they are willing to

    trade with each other.India can manufacturecotton and sell toFrance in exchange

    for wine and France isalso benefited viceversa.

    To understand thepoint further, if theworld market price for1 unit of cotton issimilar to 1 unit of

    wine, then France

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    11/14

    Logic?

    To make 1 unit of cotton France has to spend

    60 man hours which has the same value as 1

    unit of wine made in 50 hours. France can

    leave the cotton making work to India andsave those 10hours or add those 10hours

    extra for making more wine.

    India on the other hand can save 20 hoursevery time it makes cotton and gets back

    equivalent amount of wine as needed.

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    12/14

    Heckscher Ohlin Theory (H-OModel) Goods differ in terms of the factors of production. Eg.Manufacturing of textiles is labour intensive whereas

    producing microprocessors is capital intensive. Countries differ w.r.t. their factor capabilities. Eg. India

    is high in labour but UK is high in capital. A country manufactures and uses those factors which

    it has in abundance. Eg. US exports capital intensivedefense goods.

    As with previous theories,

    HO Model too is weak in the fact

    that it states markets as being static

    with factors also being constant.

    Present markets change using

    innovation, intelligence

    (Indian software), taste and

    need for the goods and other reasons.

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    13/14

    Strategic Trade Theory-Combination of the latest

    trade theories. Key factors Increasing returns to scale- firms will produce andexport more and more inorder to lower costs througheconomies of scale.

    Product differentiation- there can also be intra-industry competition. i.e. within the same industry wecan have trade. Eg. Japan will trade Toyotas and Hondawith Germany in exchange for Mercedes and BMWs.

    Imperfect competition- companies might have to facevarious hurdles to sell to other nations. Eg. India mightgive special subsidies to Videocon so as to keepJapanese Sony and Aiwa costlier than domesticplayers.

  • 8/14/2019 5 Trade Theories

    14/14

    Externalities & spillover effects-Once a new technology product issold outside, other countries might

    reverse-engineer and make their ownversions. Thus the original makersuffers losses of loss of market. IPrights and patents play a role.

    Irreversible investments- eg. When

    earth-moving equipment companieslike Caterpillar suffered huge lossesin 1980s they had no choice but tocontinue as such because

    the costs for market reentry

    would have been sky high

    (building distribution

    networks, partners etc.)