Upload
igor-stefanet
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
1/17
5 BIG TOURNAMENT LEAKS
BY RICK DACEY
FEBRUARY 2012
Busting MTTs too easily? Min-cashing when you should be final-tabling? Then
its time to plug those leaks
Tournaments are high variance affairs. You get dealt Ace-King, someone else
gets Queens, the board bricks and youre out again. Its not your fault, thats just
the way it goes. Now keep telling yourself that.
Each tournament is a series of situations and decisions, full of missed
opportunities, exploitation, concentration lapses and moments of cowardice. All
that, aside from factoring in coolers, bad luck and being card dead, makes itdamn hard to win a tournament, but lets nail five of the biggest mistakes that are
made and how you can avoid them.
1. Stacking off too early
What is the leak?
Anyone can get coolered, but stacking off too light, too early marks you out as a
big flapping fish. Just stop it.
Why is it a leak?
If you lose your stack way before the money appears even on the distant horizon
then you probably either got coolered or played badly. The former is merely
annoying, but the latter needs addressing.
Losing an entire 100BB stack with Kings or Aces on a ten-high or Jack-high flop
does not count as a cooler, it usually counts as bad play. Too many players are
willing to get stacks in with one-pair hands and overpairs, and then berate their
opponents for calling with trash, even if the call was justified because you were
willing to stack off with one pair.
How do we fix it?
Learn how to fold or go into bluff-catching mode if youre consistently busting
out of tournaments too early. If youre a regular cash game player then youll
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
2/17
probably have a better grasp of the earlier stages of a tournament thanks to more
practice at deeperstacked play. Youll also have seen how often big pairs get
undone by flopped sets, two-pairs and combo draws in single-raised pots.
Unless youve got good reason to believe that someone is super-loose and spewy
you can often go into bluff-catching mode or just pass on particularly
coordinated boards. By adopting a check and call posture in the correct situations
you might be able to extract value out of players with second pair or a weak top
pair who might otherwise pass or only give you action with the hands in their
range that crush you.
Is it perfect power poker? No, but in many smaller buy-in tournaments youre not
going to be playing the Jake Codys of this world, and you must adapt your play
to the rocks and pedestrian players. Stop bundling in 60 or 70 big blinds in a
single hand with top pair. Its probably not good.
Another way of going broke less often is to reduce the number of hands youre
playing, because if youre involved in fewer hands thats fewer situations where
you can go bust. Sounds simple? It is. Okay, the flip side is that its going to be
harder to run up a monster stack, but if your problem is busting out too early then
you need to focus on survival first and foremost.
If youre going bust or losing large chunks of your stack with hands such as Q-T
or T-7 then how about not playing those hands?
2. Picking the wrong fights
What is the leak?
Not adjusting to different player styles and subscribing to an egocentric view ofthe world.
Why is it a leak?
Every tournament has a broad spread of players, from super-tight rocks to
kamikaze spewtards, total beginners to MTT pros. If youre not constantly
assessing the players at your table you can miss key spots and easy folds, and get
yourself into unnecessarily difficult situations, such as playing good aggressiveplayers out of position.
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
3/17
How do we fix it?
Cold hard honesty is the first step, and concentration the second. If there is a
player whose game you rate, you might want to avoid tangling with them in
marginal spots and instead focus on the players who appear to be softer and more
exploitable.
Tougher players dont have to be avoided altogether, but try to play them in
position when you do engage them as it will help to level the odds or, even
better, tip the scales in your favour. Making notes is a good starting point if you
dont do so already.
The act of typing notes will help you in the future and, perhaps more importantly,
keep you focused in the here and now. By paying attention to your opponents
youll be able to make folds that you wouldnt be able to if you were playing
generically, or bluff all-in over river blocker bets that you might otherwise give
up on.
3. Blinding out
What is the leak?
Dribbling your stack down to just a few big blinds then busting.
Why is it a leak?
Letting yourself get blinded out of a tournament is one of the biggest schoolboy
errors you can make. Yes, there are always exceptions, such as when playing in a
satellite tourney or playing snug to creep into the money, but in most casesfolding your stack down to below ten big blinds is a massive leak.
Youre letting yourself get to a point where your shoves are going to get called
very wide and youhave probably been failing to take advantage of good spots.
How do we fix it?
When you find yourself with less than 30 big blinds you should start looking outfor good three-bet shoving spots with hands that dont necessarily always flop
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
4/17
brilliantly, such as small pairs.
Imagine youre down to 26 big blinds and a relatively aggressive player opens
for 2.5 big blinds from middle position. Youre in the hijack with pocket eights.
You can call off almost 10% of your stack in an attempt to flop a set, but youre
most likely to find yourself folding to a continuation bet.
A preflop raise could allow you to get away if they come back over the top but,
quite frankly, thats a horrible play, leaving a third of your stack in the middle
when you could easily be on the right side of a coinflip. If you shove youll often
take the pot there and then, picking up as much as five or six blinds for free if
antes are in play.
If you are called, either by the original raiser or one of the remaining players yet
to act, which wont happen frequently, youll often be a slight favourite against
Ace-King or Ace-Queen and occasionally a four-toone dog against a larger pair.
Dont get too results orientated when this happens if its a good spot to shove
then you should take it. And you could always suck out. In the right situations
and against players with loose opening ranges you can shove a wide range of
hands with around 20 big blinds: pairs, Broadway hands and even occasionally
some suited connectors.
Sure, youll bust out spectacularly sometimes, but overall youll give yourself
more chances to run deep rather than dribbling down to 8BB, shoving A-T and
losing to pocket fives. Again.
4. Betting too big in the late stages
What is the leak?
Put simply, many players are getting their mid to late stage tournament bet sizing
all kinds of wrong. You dont need to bet as much.
Why is it a leak?
The best tournament players dont open-raise for three or four big blinds,
particularly in the later stages, where a min-raise becomes de rigueur amongthose in the know. Once play becomes a matter of shoving or folding, you can
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
5/17
achieve the same results with a smaller bet that risks less of your stack.
How do we fix it?
In the later stages of a tournament when the average stack-to-blinds ratio drops,
the minimum raise preflop becomes the most effective bet size. Youre still
taking aggressive action to win the blinds and antes, but risking the very
minimum when youre going to be shoved on more often than flat-called.
When your stack is some 25-40BB deep those extra chips can quickly add up.
Minor alterations like this can have large knock-on effects too. If you do get
called then you can again risk less to win the pot on the flop, as there wont be as
much in there. And you can also alter your postflop betting in the later stages
where proportionally smaller flop bets will have the same effect of picking up a
shove or a fold.
Whybet a pot-sized 20k when an 8k c-bet will have the same result in the
majority of cases?
5. Incorrectly calling three-bets
What is the leak?
There is a time and place for calling three-bets, and its not when you have no
idea where you are or what youre going to do.
Why is it a leak?
Calling three-bets, particularly out of position, can be a recipe for disaster for any
but the very best postflop heroes. Theres been plenty written about calling three-bets when youre deep enough with small or medium pocket pairs for set-mining
purposes, but in the middle to late stages those situations will be fairly scarce.
Time and time again youll call a three-bet only to face a c-bet on a flop which
you have missed or have only partially connected with. How much heat do you
think youll be able to face with 8-9 suited?
How do we fix it?
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
6/17
There are two key options presenting themselves at this point: four-bet or fold. A
fold is quite straightforward you get rid of your hand and move on.
If youre now making smaller raises preflop then you can get away fairly easily
for a downtick of just a couple of big blinds. The other road takes you to four-bet
city. Four-bet city is a fun place, but its also dangerous if you dont know what
youre doing.
If you suspect your opponent may be three-betting light then youre going to win
a lot of pots by coming back over the top with a four-bet. Occasionally they will
come back over the top with a five-bet, at which point you can get it in with the
hands you want action with and toss the ones you dont.
Its important to make sure that when you pull out a four-bet bluff its against
either a thinking aggressive player, who will understand what youre
representing with the small four-bet and fold a lot of hands in their range, or an
unthinking rock-ish player, who will muck all but the top of their range to make
your four-bet profitable.
As a good rule of thumb you should never be sticking a third of your stack in
preflop planning to fold to a reraise, as there are very few hands you arent
getting a good price to call. In theory, four-bets polarise you to premium hands
that youre happy to get it all-in with and bluffs, and as such you can make that
four-bet small not that much more than a minraise over your opponents three-
bet.
You should always plan what youre going to do should your opponent come
back over the top. Call their shove, move in over the top or pass? Dont leave
yourself humming and hawing: think before you act.
POKER THOERY: TOURNAMENTS
BY LUKE DESULTORY HATFIELD
AUGUST 2012
The theoretical differences between cash games and tournaments and how to
build your edge
For a very long time I have purely been focused on the theory of cash games. I
used to be an 18-man and nineman sit-and-go pro when I started my poker career
but I have since forgotten all of my sit-and-go theory knowledge.
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
7/17
But during the Spring Championship of Online Poker (SCOOP) I thought it
would be a good time to refresh my tourney skills and I thought I would share
various things I have re-learnt in the process. So, I will start from the beginning;
Given that tournaments have even more variance than cash games, one can
conclude that one will need a larger bankroll for playing a $100 tournament than
a $100 buy-in cash game.
This is assuming you are of similar relative proficiency at both types of game. I
havent bashed the
numbers, but there is a consensus you need 100 buyins to be safe from busting
from playing tournaments. A fairly conservative estimate for cash games would
be about 50 buyins. So thats at
least twice as much!
If you are competent, it seems you will be in the money (cash prizes) around
20% on average for sitandgos and maybe slightly less for MTTs. So on
average, you will only win cash once every fi ve tournaments you play. Please
dont be shorttermist and think you are competent because you won one or
because you cashed in three straight tournaments.
You will need a much bigger sample sizes than this. It is said that you will need
to play 1,000 tournaments to discount variance, but I think this is an
underestimate and you can find out why if
you read myvariance articles on cash games here.
Measuring Skill Levels
Tournament players measure their competence by a term called Return On
Investment (ROI). ROI is calculated by the following sum: (total cash prizes total money spent on buyins)/total money
spent on buyins.
The best sitandgo players earn 20% ROIs and general consensus says that the
best MTT players can earn 100% ROI. This is completely different to the
BB/100 win rate measure that cash game players use.
By far the most important difference to understand when transitioning totournaments is that in cash games, any +EV move should be executed because
http://www.pokerplayer.co.uk/search/?words=variance&searchby=maxim&x=0&y=0http://www.pokerplayer.co.uk/search/?words=variance&searchby=maxim&x=0&y=0http://www.pokerplayer.co.uk/search/?words=variance&searchby=maxim&x=0&y=0http://www.pokerplayer.co.uk/search/?words=variance&searchby=maxim&x=0&y=07/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
8/17
+ChipEV is directly related to +$EV. But in tournaments, as your stack doesnt
have a fixed value, +ChipEV doesnt always equal +$EV. In other words, you
can make a move that will win you chips, which will lose you money in the long
term.
Sometimes +ChipEV can be $EV and therefore in order to be successful one
has to relinquish some +ChipEV spots in tournaments that one never should in a
cash game. This is all assuming that your goal in poker is to make the most
money. If your goal is to come fi rst more than your average share in
tournaments then your tactics may be slightly different.
There is a mathematical model called the Independent Chip Model (ICM) which
calculates how much a players current stack is worth at a given time in a
tournament. It produces your percentage share of the prize pool when
considering your stack and the amount of players left in the tournament. To help
you understand this Ill give you an example from a typical nine-handed sit-and-
go.
There is a sit-and-go with a standard payout structure of 50% for fi rst, 30% for
second and 20% for third and there are four players left. We will assume that the
four players have exactly the same stack size, and therefore their share in the
prizepool is equal to their share of the chip total.
Two players go all-in and one gets knocked out. Then on the next hand, one of
the smaller stacks goes all-in against the bigger stack and gets knocked out. The
respective ICM values are as follows in the table you can see on the right of the
page. When there are three players, the big stack has 50% share of the total chips
but its wrong to assume his stack is worth 50% of the prizepool on average,
because that assumes he will come fi rst every time.
It is true that the big stack will have more chance to come first than the small
stacks but the ICM attempts to give a more reasonable approximation of stack
worth. Obviously none of them will win exactly what the ICM %EV suggests, it
is just the average long term winnings they can expect to gain with that specific
stack. If you want to calculate stack worth in $EV you multiply the ICM stack
percentage by the total prize pool. For example: $100 prize pool * 25% ICM =
$25 stack worth.
The Meaning of ICM
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
9/17
So what are the implications of this? As you can see from the table, when two
players go allin and one player gets knocked out the other two players not
involved in the action have had their stacks increase in value by 5.8% of the prize
pools. By sitting tight, they have won money. In cash games, you have to play to
win money.
Another thing to note is the player who doubled his stack has only gained an
extra 13.3% of EV, so by going allin he risked 25% of his EV to gain 13.3% EV.
This can create some strange dynamics where players should fold hands as good
as AK even if it is +ChipEV to play it! Say you are in the late stages of a
sitandgo with a payout structure 40%, 30%, 20%, 10% for 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th.
There are three players left so you are already in the money. The blinds are now
50/100. The big stack of 2,000 chips goes allin on the button and the small blind
calls for 1,001 chips. You have 1,000 chips and you have AKo in the big blind.
You know that the button is shoving 100% of hands here and you know that
small blind is calling 9.5% of hands (A9s+, ATo+ & 66+). If you call you will
win a pot of 3,000 about 38% of the time and you will lose your stack 62% of the
time. So doing an ChipEV calculation: You call & win: (1,000+1,000+100) *
38% = 798. You call and you lose: (900) * 62% = 558. So 798 558 = 240. As a
fold is 0 EV, and 240>0 you should call if not considering ICM.
You can expect to increase your stack by 240 chips, so in a cash game you would
snap call. However, ChipEV doesnt take into the cash value of your tournament
stack in $EV so lets do an ICM calculation now. You currently have 28.33% of
ICM%EV. If you lose your stack you have 0%ICM EV and if you win the pot
you now have an ICM EV% of 37.5%. You lose 62% and win 38% so 62% * 0%
+ 37.5% * 38% = 14.25%.
By calling you have just lost 28.33% 14.25% = 14.08% of the prize pool. If the
prize pool is $100, you have just lost $14.08 on average by making that call. You
should fold the AK if you are basing your plays off the ICM model.
The Reality Of ICM
So, say you are disciplined and competent enough to fold the AK and then the
small blind flips over AQ, the button fl ips over A2 and the board comesA375K.
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
10/17
You hate yourself because you just folded when you would have won if you
called. If you think like this you are destined for misery with poker. If you want
to be one of the best, you should just shrug, laugh and say to yourself: Oh well, I
made the correct fold in the long run.
The underlying ICM dynamic becomes very important in the later stages of a
tournament, but the further away the tournament is from the payout positions, the
less implication ICM should have on ones decision making. Early in a
tournament, ICM has no impact at all and therefore the game play should be
similar to a cash game.
ICM requires too many calculations to run on more than 10 players, so when
playing in an MTT, it is difficult to know at what point you should start to
consider ICM factors. Some say it only needs consideration when you reach the
final table, but I think this is incorrect. It is hard to say exactly when, but I think
you should defi nitely be tighter the closer you get to the bubble.
Because of the implications of ICM, a contrasting theory in MTTs, is that one
should play more aggressively around the bubble because everyone else should
be tightening up. This is especially true if you have a large enough stack that you
will not be knocked out if you lose an all-in and therefore the bigger stacks
become very powerful in these positions.
You should open and three-bet much wider ranges and in theory you should get
many more folds. Say you are on the bubble and you have the big stack of 3,000
chips and the three other players at your table have 1,000 chips each. Lets say
the big blind is 100 chips, so the short stacks have 10BB each. If the other three
players are competent and therefore tightening up, then you can min-raise every
unopened pot and you should win the blinds.
If the players are fishier and like to call min-raises a lot then you can usually
continuation bet half the pot to take it down. Please be wary that if you are
opening 100% then you are definitely folding to three-bets too much. When
competent players realise this, they will three-bet all-in against you quite a lot,
even on the bubble, and therefore your 100% min-raising becomes unprofitable.
In more competent games where your opponents have less than 10BBs, open
shipping all-in is better. In this scenario, you can open ship 100% of hands from
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
11/17
the button and 50% of hands from the cutoff. When trying these tactics it will
result in two scenarios: you get called by a good hand and drop your stack down
to 2,000 at which point you should start playing your usual game again, or you
will suck out and have 4,000 and can continue your shipping all-in tactics.
Usually before a call happens you will have decimated the other stacks so much
that it should be a victory on average from here on.
Sizing Up
Another important thing to consider in tournaments is stack sizes. When blinds
are small relative to stacks (stacks of 100 big blinds or more) the game play will
be mostly postflop. But as blinds increase and stacks become relatively smaller
in relation to the blinds (12-40 big blind stacks) the game play becomes much
more of a preflop game.
Relative to 100BB cash games, you will see wider value three-bet ranges and
consequently wider three-bet calling ranges (with 7-7+, A-Ts+, A-Jo+ as
standard) because of the smaller stacks. The smaller stacks will lead to a game
which has less opening, less calling prefl op, more threebetting and less folding
to three-bets.
Tournament play is much more dynamic than cash game play for all of the abovereasons. This can be very confusing for the specialised cash game player, who is
used to opening a lot and playing a certain way with 100 big blinds. Cash game
players will tend to open too much and call three-bets tighter than is optimal.
On the opposite side of the coin, because of a lack of postflop experience
tournament players will struggle in the deeper postflop cash games. That is why
there are not many players whom are successful long term in both variants. The
modern day 40BB short stackers come closest to being competent at both games,but I know of none who crush tournaments and cash games.
Some say cash games are more skilled because of the deeper stacks, and to a
certain extent it is true that deeper stacks mean more decision making options
and therefore more complications, whereas smaller stacks can often lead to a
perfect mathematical solution (going all-in), which in essence is much simpler to
execute and understand. But still, any cash game player that disrespects a tourney
pro simply doesnt fully understand the complexities of tournament play.
SECRET MOVES REVEALED: PART 1
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
12/17
AUGUST 2012
Need to add a little extra something to your tournament game? PokerPlayer
reveals the moves the pros dont want you to pull
Often you can follow the strategy advice from books and websites yet still find it
hard to regularly make deep runs. Are you just running bad or could it be youre
missing out on something? Perhaps the straightforward poker lessons are failing
you, leaving you scratching your head as others twist and turn when it really
matters?
Dont get us wrong, standard strategy works best for most situations butknowing
when to adapt, when to get tricky or simply overplay your hand can make the
difference between anothermin-cash and a final table.
In poker its almost impossible to talk about absolutes, beyondPhil
Hellmuthalways believing his own hype, so why should strategy be any different?
Lets take a look at three ways you can veer from standard play to really turn the
tournament tide in the first part of ourSecret Move Strategy Series.
1. Limping with Aces
You raise with Aces, right? Of course you do. You raise for value, to take
advantage of an aggressive image and to ensure that drawing hands pay more to hit
their gin flop. Well, doing that early in a tournament is pretty difficult. When the
blinds are 25/50 and the average stack is a smidge over 10k its pretty difficult to
drum up much value unless an opponent happens to have Kings.
So what are you going to do with your pocket rockets, particularly if you are in
early-ish position? Try a limp. If you dont pick up a raise from a genuine hand or
someone just trying to swipe a limped pot, then you go to the flop with huge
implied odds.
If you bink an Ace youll likely have flopped the nuts and can extract value from
your heavily disguised hand. If you dont flop an Ace then you can play your hand
as a cautious overpair. But thats not the reason we suggest you should be limping
here.
If someone limps in and you both flop a set theres very little chance you wont
take it all, but thats going to happen infrequently. Its early on so there will still be
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
13/17
plenty of weak players left in the field and should someone telegraph strength
preflop with a raise its highly unlikely that theyll leave the hand to a limp-reraise.
Make it big, get the action heads-up in a grossly inflated pot and try to get it in on
the flop.
How to do it: You limp for 50 as do two other players and a player with pocket
Tens bumps it up to around 250. The blinds pass and you come back over the top
for 1,000. The limpers now pass and the player with pocket Tens umms-andahhs
before finally making the call. If you then pile into the flop youll frequently get
jammed on by a hand youre crushing that may have passed to four-bet preflop or,
at the very least, may have shut down when he saw a King or Queen on the flop.
Dont be a fish: If stack sizes are still deep postflop then dont be a clown and
blindly punt your stack off. Be wary of draw-heavy flops or those with multiple
court cards on them.
2. The donk bet
The donk bet has had some bad press in the past, and for good reason. A donk bet
is when youve been the passive player out of position and then lead into the flop,
for example when you call a raise preflop and then bet out first to act on the flop.
Most players in this situation are going to c-bet the majority of the hands that they
raise with preflop so by leading with what you think is the winning hand youll
simply make most players fold before donating a c-bet to you. Hence the term
donk bet.
So donk betting is for donks then? Well, perhaps not. Team PokerStars pro Jude
j.thaddeus Ainsworth is one of the most successful tournament players around
and he loves leading into opponents. Why? Its a great way to inflate a pot without
setting the alarm bells off in the same way as the check-raise or losing value when
you trap check-call on the flop and your opponent checks behind on the turn and
river. The donk bet is widely recognised as being weak, so who would play two-
pair or a large combodraw that way? Usually no-one, but should you find yourself
up against a player who really doesnt like to fold then leading may buy you more
action.
How to do it: If youre facing a livewire who is willing to call with any part of the
flop, backdoor draws or simply to float then this is your time to donk bet. If theyre
a frequent floater look to check-raise them on the turn for value. If theyre in the
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
14/17
passive school of not paying attention to the size of bets, and rather see a pile of
chips as a pile of chips, then keep doing the betting for them.
Checking in these spots is to allow the other player to do the betting for you. If you
think theyre not going to oblige and are more likely to check behind with marginal
hands then why not take a stab? Remember, there are no hard and fast rules in
poker.
Dont be a fish: Dont go donking into the ABC player. Theyll look at their King-
Ten and the Jack flop and fold. Pull this move on the loose players that dont want
to pass.
3. Incorrectly calling three-bets
The stop-and-go is so last decade you probably dont even remember what it was.
Someone would raise and youd call out of position, largely in the big blind, and
then shove whatever was left of your stack into the middle no matter what the flop
was. It was far more effective in those more innocent years when players over-
estimated their fold equity, under-appreciated pot odds and assumed that no-one
would shove with anything less than top pair.
These days players underestimate fold equity, put far too much faith in pot odds
despite not being able to calculate them and think that their opponents will shove
with anything.
This can work to your advantage, particularly when your opponent is a loose
player, or has a big stack. This is not a great technique to use against similarly
stacked players as the shove will endanger too many of their own precious chips
making them unlikely to call with weaker hands and losing you value. Against
players with a similar stack youre better off either check-raising into them or
calling a shove. Remember, try not to get too carried away with these techniques
and always apply them in addition to a solid tournament strategy.
How to do it: Rather than making that three-bet shove all-in with a premium hand,
which is likely to fold out a large chunk of the bullys range, call the raise and jam
the flop. Yes, youll occasionally make hands fold that may have called you all-in
preflop but more frequently youll get looked up by hands that would have passed
preflop but have now caught something. The shove will often confuse players,
particularly on drawing flops, and get you looked up by any pair.
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
15/17
Dont be a fish: Remember the tournament equity attached to your stack. This is
not the kind of move for you to pull off near the bubble where you should be
leveraging your fold equity when you can. Use it to chip up when the money jumps
arent significant or the bubble is still some way off.
That's it for part 1, but don't forget to check PokerPlayer.co.uk next week for the
second part in this series.
SECRET MOVES REVEALED: PART 2
AUGUST 2012
Need to add a little extra something to your tournament game? PokerPlayer
reveals the moves the pros dont want you to pullOften you can follow the strategy advice from books and websites yet still find it
hard to regularly make deep runs. Are you just running bad or could it be youre
missing out on something? Perhaps the straightforward poker lessons are failing
you, leaving you scratching your head as others twist and turn when it really
matters?
Dont get us wrong, standard strategy works best for most situations but knowing
when to adapt, when to get tricky or simply overplay your hand can make thedifference between anothermin-cash and a final table.
In poker its almost impossible to talk about absolutes, beyondPhil
Hellmuth always believing his own hype, so why should strategy be any different?
Lets take a look at three ways you can veer from standard play to really turn the
tournament tide in the second part of ourSecret Move Strategy Series.
4. The min-bet
Youve all seen it online. Theres 850 in the pot and some joker bets 100 into it.
What is the point? Well, because it sometimes seems to work. Were certainly not
advocating you take this on as a frequent tournament policy but if youre wanting
to see the turn in a hand where youre lacking much equity, a gutshot perhaps, then
a min-bet can sometimes be enough to throw your opponent off from making a
continuation bet allowing you to see if you hit your hand for (pretty much) free. It
will very infrequently make someone that would have checked back suddenlyraise, certainly at the lower levels anyway.
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
16/17
How to do it: Use this tricky one sparingly. When youre holding a hand with only
a few out, try stabbing at the pot with a minimum bet. If you get raised then you
can simply release your hand.
Dont be a donk: Dont let yourself min-bet then make a bad call when your
opponent raises it up to three-quarters pot. It looks like a fishy move, and it is a
fishy move, but very occasionally it can work.
5. The call to induce the squeeze
Youll have read in the hallowed pages of PokerPlayer many times before that
slow-playing a big hand because youre worried about scaring off opponents is a
case of fishy thinking, and rightfully so. However, occasionally disguising your
hand can get you paid off. If you have aggressive players to your left you can use
their aggression against them by inducing a squeeze by flat-calling with a premium
hand.
The same can work if youre shorter but with a playable stack of around 30 big
blinds. An open to 400, a min-raise at the 100/200 level, would leave the pot with
7.5 big blinds after youd called and a squeeze might make that closer to 14 big
blinds which would allow you to come back over the top with what would look
like a small pair.
How to do it: You hold a hand, such as A-Qs, and there has already been a call of
the initial raise. A decent player with a stack of around 20BBs will see all those
dead chips in the middle, and think theyve only got the open raiser to get past to
scoop the pot. Not so, you and your monster lay in wait.
Dont be a fish: Dont get locked into your hand postflop if no-one bites.
6. Raise-folding with equity
At this years WSOP Neil Badbeat Channing came close to winning his first
bracelet but couldnt quite cross that final hurdle despite having the opposite
number, Henry Lu, down to a five-toone chip deficit twice. Channing ground Lu
down but the big showdowns just didnt go his way. A move Channing adopted a
few times was a three-bet preflop which didnt set his opponent in but didnt look
like hed pass to a shove.
7/30/2019 5 Big Tournament Leaks
17/17
Rather than setting his opponent all-in he polarised his opponents hand and kept
the pressure on him. If you think your opponent isnt going to four-bet shove light
and you think theres little difference between their four-bet shoving and their
three-bet calling ranges then it can make sense to keep it small ball when heads-up.
How to do it: This works best heads-up. Dont be afraid to three-bet bluff and fold
if your opponent shoves. They might think you have to call based on pot odds,
but you dont.
Dont be a fish: Look at the stack sizes before you start thinking about raise-
folding. If youre getting two-to-one DO NOT FOLD.
If you missed part 1 of this strategy series click here.