View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 4th Quarter 2007 Commentary
1/4
Asset mANAGemeNt
Our Year in Review
In absolute terms, portolio perormance in 2007 turned
out reasonably well or our clients. Depending on the mix
o equities and xed income, portolio returns ranged
between 7% and 9%. Compared to our perormance
benchmark, stock results in the Nelson Roberts portolios
were outstanding. Our stock portolios beat the S&P 500
return o 5.49% by about 300 basis points (~3.0%).
(See the box below or index return data.)
The perormance o our portolios was aided by decisions
on sector allocation weightings as well as individual stock
selection. Specically, our decision to limit exposure in the
nance and consumer discretionary sectors, which were
down -17% and -12% respectively, beneted our port-
olio returns. Additionally, our light allocation to small
capitalization stocks also helped. We cut our small stock
exposure in hal in late 2006 to 2.5% o client equity
allocations. The Russell 2000 Index o small stocks was
down -1.6% or the year.
Our selection o individual stocks also aided portolio per-
ormance. Beginning with the sale o Goldman Sachs at
$211 per share on July 19th, we signicantly reduced our
already underweighted nance holdings. At the time we
eared the momentum in credit market problems would
disproportionately aect large money center banks, like
portolio holdings Goldman Sachs and Citigroup. A sale
o Citigroup, at $48 per share, would ollow in the ear
all as the cloud over money center banks darkened. O
August 23rd, we added a position in Brown & Brown,
a mid-market insurance broker with no exposure to th
subprime mortgage mess. On October 23rd, we bough
shares in American Express on the belie that the spend
habits o its typically more afuent customers would no
be signicantly impacted i an economic slowdown act
ally occurs. While both Brown & Brown and American
Express declined rom our purchase price, neither was a
weak as Citigroup, which closed the year at $29.44 per
share. Goldman, ater trading as low as $169, closed th
year just above our sale price at $215.
Portolio activity was not limited to the nance sector.
During the year we sold a long-held position in Avery
Dennison in exchange or 3M. Since then, Avery has
allen and 3M has risen, resulting in 41% more return o
this position. Another successul exchange, selling a pos
tion in Dupont and buying Monsanto, yielded an even
more impressive 59% improvement. Uncharacteristical
we sold our Monsanto position or a short-term capita
gain on the belie that the shares had quickly become
overvalued, achieving during our three month holding
period what we expected over two years. The act that
Monsanto closed the year at $111 ($20 above our sellinprice) argues that our valuation parameters may have
been too stringent. We kick ourselves or not holding
on or the momentum ride, though as Phil Nelson used
to say, You cant go broke taking prots.
We selected the right managers to buy international
stocks or our clients portolios. The index or interna-
tional market returns, the EAFE Index, was up 10%. Th
two actively managed unds we hold, Masters Select
International and Matthews Pacic were up 34% and 19
fOUrtH QUArter 2007QUARTERLYCommentary
INDEX PERFORMANCE Q4 07 YTD
Dow Jones Industrials -3.91 8.87
Standard & Poors 500 -3.33 5.49
EAFE (international stocks) -1.70 11.73
Russell 2000 (small stocks) -4.57 -1.56
Lehman Intermediate 2.91 7.39
Lehman Municipal 1.36 3.36
Inside this Issue
Asset mANAGemeNt
: : Our Year in Review
firm perspective
: : Nothing is Certainbut Death and Taxes
meet A memBer Of
tHe firm
: : Terrence Boyd, Jr.
www.nelsonroberts.com | 650.322.4
7/31/2019 4th Quarter 2007 Commentary
2/4
WeexpecttheFedwillcontinuetoerronthgrowth,andequityreturnswillsurprisewithstocksreactingtoeasy money.
Largest
Fiteen Equity
Holdings
Schlumberger
Mathews Pacifc Tiger Fund
iShares EAFE Index Fund
Procter & Gamble
Masters Select International
Chevron
Marathon Oil
Utilities Sector SPDR
Texas Instruments
General Electric
Emerson Electric
State Street Corp
Intl Business Machines
WalgreenMicrosot
Some o the best decisions we made this year were ones
that resulted in no activity. We stayed clear o the value
traps oered in the carnage o the subprime mortgage
mess and homebuilder stocks. Both types o investments
continued to decline. We passed on several stocks that
continued to all throughout the year including Washington
Mutual and Trex, a manuacturer o synthetic wood used
or decking. Each o these stocks was down over 60%
or the year.
While we are pleased with the value we delivered to our
client portolios, we also have to acknowledge the oppor-
tunities missed. Gold, which we do not own, rose 30.5%
and our technology stocks, though strong, underperormed
the index as we missed the trio o the best perorming
technology shares: Apple was up 133.5%, Research in
Motion, the maker o the ubiquitous Blackberry, was up
126.6% and Google was up 50.5%. Yes, picking stocks
is always a humbling experience.
W Lan o Ou pa
Back in early 2000, we did really well or clients by
cutting back on technology stocks and increasing our
exposure to the healthcare and consumer staple sector
In 2001, the nancial markets were very weak and our
eorts were ocused on mitigating the risks in our equit
portolios. Heading into 2002, we got back into the
market too early with the expectation that a bull marke
would return. During the 2000-2002 period, the equity
market had the worst returns in 2002. A change in ma
ket leadership oten takes longer than most prognosti-
cators expect. We do not believe this time is dierent.
Recall the popular cocktail party chatter about attractiv
investment opportunities in real estate in mid-2005.
Compare the current bursting bubble in housing to the
last one in technology. Were in the midst o the housin
bubble bursting and in our opinion it is not over yet.
i wa a na od ya o h aoun o aal gan w ook. to w,
w ll holdng bau:
Investmentsreachtargetedvaluesandbecomeovervalued.ExamplesofthiswereMonsanto,
Stericycle and SunOpta.
Wendabetteropportunity.Forexample,sellingAveryandbuying3M,orsellingDupontand
buying Monsanto.
Ourdesiretodecreaseourexposuretooneparticularsector,suchasnancethispastyear.
Anunfavorablechangeinthebusinessstructureorcompetitivemarketplace.Forexample,inMay
we sold our position in Equiax, a company that primarily makes money providing credit reports
to mortgage lenders. This stock ell precipitously in July as the subprime problems widened. Poorexecutionorchangeinacompanysmanagementstrategy.Wesoldanunprotable
position in Motorola this year because o its continued management missteps that resulted in
poor stock perormance.
Uniquecircumstances,suchasapendingmergeroracquisition,thatresultinastocksrapid
rise and make it simply an arbitrage on whether the deal is completed. We typically will avoid this
risk, take our gains and move on. Our sale o Caremark early in the year is an example o this.
We are less reticent to take gains at present because we have a sneaking hunch that we have
seen the low in capital gains tax rates. It will be interesting to see how a new Administration in
the White House infuences tax policy in 2009.
7/31/2019 4th Quarter 2007 Commentary
3/4
of
upside
Best Holdings
o 2007
Schlumberger +56
Monsanto +45
Matthews Pacic +34
Intel +33
Marathon Oil +33
Worst Holding
o 2007
McGraw Hill -35
Volcano Corp -30
Amgen -24
Motorola -19
Zimmer Holdings -16
www.nelsonroberts.com | 650.322.4000
V
v i s i o n
What is money?
At its simplest, it remains a orm o barter, an exchange o energy or good
At its most complex, its a symbol o mastery, a measure o power. At its ce
are people with vision, talent, skill, amilies, children, hope and dreams.
[vizh en] n. the ability to perceive or foresee through mental acuteness
eono and fxd ino
The Lehman Brothers Intermediate Government Corpo-
rate Bond Index exceeded our xed income portolio
returns o 4-5% by close to 2.5%. The Federal Open
Market Committee (FOMC) cut rates three times this all
in an eort to stabilize the banking and housing indus-
tries. We positioned our portolios to protect against
rising infation that would result in rising interest rates
and alling bond prices. In the second hal o 2007 when
rates declined in reaction to economic concern and FOMC
action, the xed income component o our portolios
went up less than the overall bond market. We continue
to believe the greatest risks in the xed income markets
are low credit quality and infation. Thereore, we con-
tinue to maintain high quality, short-term bond holdings
to oset these risks.
The Fed is walking the knies edge between infation
and defation. Three cuts in short term rates still have
not solved the credit markets liquidity problem. Is the
growing infation problem being masked by the Feds
ocus on core statistics (infation less the impact o ood
and energy)? Commodity prices have run up signicantly
in the last ew years. Industrial metals seem to have
peaked but oil and ood prices continue to rise. The 200%
increase in the cost o oil during the last our years will
eventually push the broader infation statistics higher.
The opposite side o the knie is a debt-extinguishment-
through-deault scenario. Many parts o the credit
markets have become near rozen. Specialized o-bal-
ance sheet investments known as Structured Investment
Vehicles (SIVs) were created by many o the money center
institutions. SIVs used extensive borrowing to leverage
the return opportunity by borrowing short-term in the
money markets and lending long-term in the nance and
mortgage sectors. As the short-term borrowings come
due, these SIVs have been unable to access capital in
the commercial paper market because the value o their
collateral, oten subprime mortgages, has dropped. The
subprime mortgage problems are spreading and many
(including us) ear we have seen only the tip o the
iceberg. It remains to be seen how much more o the
iceberg is yet to be revealed. The extreme volatility in
both the stock and the bond markets is a refection o
how market participants abhor uncertainty.
exaon
As we begin 2008, the markets are aced with possible
weaknesses, but we believe there are also some corre-
sponding strengths:
WeAKNesses streNGtHs
Weak housing markets Stable job growth
A tired consumer worriedabout alling home equityand rising ood and energycosts
Stable wages(personal income)
A liquidity mess in manyparts o the fxed incomemarket
Federal Reserve actions =TAF (Term Auction Facility)injections o $40 B to aidliquidity
We expect the Fed will continue to err on the side o
growth, and equity returns will surprise on the upside
with stocks reacting to easy money and continued
strength rom international revenue sources. Dramatic
price movements will continue, but equities will nish the
year in positive territory. Fixed Income markets will suer
rom the buildup o infationary pressures and the con-
tinued fight to quality with credit risk uncertainty.
Though we believe the strengths will overcome the weak-
nesses, we have positioned our client portolios more
deensively to hedge the rising possibility o an economicslowdown. On aggregate, our portolio companies have
signicant exposure away rom the U.S. consumer. Our
holdings are in companies with very low debt and strong
cash positions. We have increased our exposure to histori-
cally more deensive sectors like healthcare, consumer
staples and industrials. We have opted to avoid interest
rate or credit risk in our bond portolios and will continue
to hold short-term high quality issuances.
7/31/2019 4th Quarter 2007 Commentary
4/4
firm perspective
Nothing is certain but death and taxes...but today neither is certain.by Brian Roberts
Benjamin Franklin has been attributed with saying, In this world nothing is certain
but death and taxes. While we would agree with Mr. Franklin that we will all pay taxesand eventually perish, he might have been surprised to learn how much uncertainty
surrounds these events these days, specically regarding timing and amounts.
One o the rst actions o the Bush Administration in 2001 was to pass the Economic
Growth and Tax Relie Reconciliation Act, which included the adjustment o the personal
estate tax exemption. From 1987 through 1997, the estate tax exemption remained
unchanged at $600,000. As asset values infated (most notably homes), an increasing
number o Americans were subject to an estate tax liability upon death. With the revi-
sion o the tax code, this exemption amount was upwardly adjusted, growing rom the
$675,000 in 2001, reaching $3,500,000 in 2009, with estate taxes being eliminated
entirely in 2010. The catch, however, is that in 2011 the exemption would return to
$1,000,000 per person. The anticipated joke about the new estate tax plan o pushing
Mom and Dad out o the Learjet in 2010 soon ollowed.
When the sunset provisions o the new estate tax exemptions were put in place in
2002,many speculated that a more permanent revision would be reached in Congress
relatively quickly. It is now 2008 and the status o estate tax exemption beyond 2009
remains a mystery. The consensus opinion o estate planning attorneys is that a perma-
nent resolution will be reached in 2008 with the exemption settling at $3,500,000 per
individual. Until there is certainty in the tax legislation, estate planning conversations
will be ull o speculation.
This uncertainty in the tax code is not isolated to estate settlement issues. Even the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has aced challenges. While Congress hotly debated
deense spending and adjustments to tax legislation during its summer and all sessions,
the IRS encouraged a speedy resolution by indicating it would need ten weeks to
implement any changes. Congress did nally come to a resolution that would again
x the increasing number o tax lers who were subject to the Alternative Minimum
Tax (AMT) by upwardly adjusting the AMT exemption. The late resolution compromise,
reached on December 19th, will result in the potential delay in processing or more
than three million U.S. citizens. Ater Congress adjourned or the holiday, the IRS went
to work reprogramming its system to comply with the new tax laws. The tax lers who
will be most aected are those subject to the AMT and qualiy or a reund. The IRS
has estimated it will be unable to process AMT related returns until February 11th.
While 2008 will continue to be lled with uncertainty regarding taxes, we at Nelson
Roberts hope with certaintyyou enjoy a Happy New Year lled with health, happiness,
and prosperity.
Meet a Member o the Firm: : As the rms Trading and Portolio Accountant, tn Boyd provides
management and oversight o day-to-day transactions or clients, record-
keeping, account reconciliation, and client service compliance. He works
closely with the custodian rms to ensure a successul client experience across
organizations. Terrence has been with Nelson Roberts since he graduated rom
Santa Clara University in the spring o 2006. He recently sat or Level I o the
Chartered Financial Analyst exam. Clients and colleagues alike appreciate
Terrences attention to detail and proessional demeanor.
2000 University Avenue, Suite 601
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
l 650-322-4000
wb www.nelsonroberts.com
Kimberly Carlisle, Images o Light Photography
iNvestmeNt ADvisOrY teAm
Brooks Nelson, CFA
Brian Roberts, CFA
Stephen Philpott
For additional inormation on the services o Nelson Roberts Investme
Advisors, or to receive our Newsletters via e-mail or be removed rom
our mailing list, please contact Elizabeth Fannon at 650-322-4000 or
2008 Nelson Roberts Investment Advisors
CP Larson Photography