Upload
noel-nichols
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
4.1 Best practices for centralisation of data in authorizing MS with relation 4.1 Best practices for centralisation of data in authorizing MS with relation to 50/50 split of collection costs?to 50/50 split of collection costs?
Make use of indicators to detect declarations. Preferably common indicators when common system, (i.e. Procedure code), until or otherwise national indicators, (i.e. Operator and goods location code)
COM to produce a list of national contact points for SASP
Execution of payment national competence (could be outside of Customs)
4.2 How to effect transfer of funds?4.2 How to effect transfer of funds?
Provide for transfer in currency ˝collected˝Submit a summary to participating MS
according to AA AnnexSummary preferably to be possible to generate
from ICS (by using indicators) after 1/7 2009, until then by national system
Actual payment often outside of Customs
4.3 Should possibility to include more MS when reassesseing be 4.3 Should possibility to include more MS when reassesseing be considered?considered?
Questionnarie from COM to MS to receive knowledge of position on SASP
Questionnaire from MS to holders to get knowledge of desires to expand
MS competence to plan reviews
4.4 Concrete measures to take in order to expand existing and future 4.4 Concrete measures to take in order to expand existing and future SASP?SASP?
Knowledge of MS positions, i.e. No use to desire expansion if participating MS not ready
COM to offer bilateral assistance to MS when requested under exceptional circumstances
COM to create fact-sheet (short) on SASP to be published on the web(s)
Produce a list of national contact points for SASP Promote e-learning tool (COM and MS) National promotion to traders
4.5 Opting out because disagreement on the 50/50-split?4.5 Opting out because disagreement on the 50/50-split?
Not an option, 50/50 decided on political levelPossible to opt out for other reasons...
RESOLVE ISSUES!!!Dialogue, meetings, professionalism...
NOTE: Awareness of differences in AA and Convention regarding opting out (revocation)
4.6 Best practice when application is submitted? (rephrased question)4.6 Best practice when application is submitted? (rephrased question)
Scrutinize application for formal acceptanceMake contact with operator to ensure
understanding and also compliance with requirements
Arrange physical meeting(s) with participating MS
4.7 How to resolve dispute in practice?4.7 How to resolve dispute in practice?
Arrangement to run during dispute, i.e. No impact on operator
CommunicationDialogueMeetings ProfessionalismCommon senseAgree on possible MSs to offer opinion in disputeAs a very last resort, use mediator (COM)
1.9 How and when to reflect repayments and audit recoveries?1.9 How and when to reflect repayments and audit recoveries?
Need to reflect underpayments and repayments when calculating the 25 %
Use monthly summary to inform on reason for increased (recovery) or decreased (repaid) amounts from Authorizing MS
Errors detected by either MS to be communicated according to agreements in the control plan. Errors relating to consignments outside SASP not to be included.
If no supplementary declaration is submitted, commodities considered ˝not declared˝
4.8 Who should handle an appeal if SASP is not granted due to 4.8 Who should handle an appeal if SASP is not granted due to participating MS?participating MS?
The authorizing MS!Only acceptable reason for rejection is if trader
does not fulfil the SASP criteria and conditionsThe reasons to be included in the rejectionAppeal handled by authorizing MS, dialogue
with participating MS