4.0 - ENGINEERING ISSUES REPORTmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/sfv-405/images/final...annual opera epulveda Bo develop the ound and sou from Ventura n fications, and ulevard stimate

4.0 - ENGINEERING ISSUES REPORT

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Sepu

Engine

Prepared

Prepared

HNTB Co

in collabo

Novembe

lveda P

eering Iss

for:

by:

rporation

oration with P

er 2012

Pass Cor

ues Repo

Parsons Brinc

rridor S

ort

kerhoff, EMI,

ystems

, IBI Group, a

s Planni

nd V&A

ing Studdy


SepulvedaEngineeri

Tableo1 Intro

2 Corri

2.1

2.1.1

2.1.2

2.1.3

2.2

2.2.1

2.2.2

2.2.3

2.3

2.3.1

2.3.2

2.3.3

2.4

2.4.1

2.4.2

2.4.3

2.5

2.5.1

2.5.2

2.5.3

2.6

2.6.1

2.6.2

3 Next

Appendix

Appendix

a Pass Corridong Issues Rep

ofContenoduction .......

idor System C

At‐Grade Van

1 Key Eng

2 Rough‐O

3 Issues fo

At‐Grade Fre

1 Key Eng

2 Rough‐O

3 Issues fo

Aerial Viaduc

1 Key Eng

2 Rough‐O

3 Issues fo

Tolled Highw

1 Key Eng

2 Rough‐O

3 Issues fo

Fixed‐Guidew

1 Key Eng

2 Rough‐O

3 Issues fo

Toll Tunnel a

1 Key Eng

2 Issues fo

t Steps ..........

x 1: Conceptu

x 2: Higher Sp

or Systems Plport

nts.....................

Concepts ......

n Nuys/Sepul

gineering Elem

Order‐of‐Mag

or Further Inv

eeway Manag

gineering Elem

Order‐of‐Mag

or Further Inv

ct Managed L

gineering Elem

Order‐of‐Mag

or Further Inv

way Tunnel ....

gineering Elem

Order‐of‐Mag

or Further Inv

way Light Rail

gineering Elem

Order‐of‐Mag

or Further Inv

and Rail Tunn

gineering Elem

or Further Inv

.....................

ual Drawings

peed Buses

anning Study

.....................

.....................

lveda Bouleva

ments ............

gnitude Costs

vestigation an

ged Lanes ......

ments ............

gnitude Costs

vestigation an

Lanes .............

ments ............

gnitude Costs

vestigation an

.....................

ments ............

gnitude Costs

vestigation an

l or Heavy Ra

ments ............

gnitude Costs

vestigation an

el ..................

ments ............

vestigation an

.....................

y

......................

......................

ard Bus Rapid

......................

s ....................

nd Analysis ...

......................

......................

s ....................

nd Analysis ...

......................

......................

s ....................

nd Analysis ...

......................

......................

s ....................

nd Analysis ...

il Tunnel .......

......................

s ....................

nd Analysis ...

......................

......................

nd Analysis ...

......................

.....................

.....................

d Transit (BRT

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

T) ...................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

P

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

Page 1

....... 2

....... 2

....... 2

....... 4

....... 4

....... 6

....... 6

....... 8

....... 8

....... 9

..... 10

..... 12

..... 12

..... 13

..... 14

..... 16

..... 18

..... 19

..... 20

..... 22

..... 23

..... 24

..... 25

..... 27

..... 29

..... 30


SepulvedaEngineeri

1 INTRThis

key e

been

cons

task

Plan

This

Char

geot

study

conc

2 CORThe s

and

Conc

2.1 ATh

G

M

M

Ex

Th

B

p

Se

d


RODUCTIOreport presen

engineering e

n developed t

sultant teams

orders for th

ning Charrett

report provid

rrette 2, high‐

echnical asse

y that need fu

cepts are inclu

RRIDOR SYsix concepts a

2 are mainly

cepts 4 throug

At-Grade Vahe proposed

reen Line and

MetroLink Stat

MetroLink/Am

xposition LRT

he at‐grade B

us on Should

rovision of tra

epulveda Bou

escribed belo

or Systems Plport

ON nts refined co

elements for e

through work

working on t

e Sepulveda

te 1 and 2.

des a summar

‐level, concep

essments, con

urther invest

uded in the A

YSTEM COare presented

at‐grade or s

gh 6 incorpor

n Nuys/Sepat‐grade BRT

d Crenshaw/L

tion to the no

mtrak, Orange

T, and Jefferso

BRT service tr

er operations

affic signal pr

ulevard, Van N

ow.

anning Study

orridor system

each concept

king sessions w

the Transport

Pass Corridor

ry description

ptual cost est

nstructability

igation and a

Appendix.

ONCEPTSd in further d

urface alterna

rate major su

pulveda BouT provides a c

LAX Light Rail

orth. Interme

Line Sepulve

on Boulevard

aveling along

s across Sepu

riority, and qu

Nuys Bouleva

y

m concepts, r

t and issues n

with Metro p

tation Plannin

r Systems Pla

n of the conce

imates, inform

issues, and is

nalysis. In ad

etail in the fo

atives, Conce

bsurface (tun

ulevard Busonnection be

Transit (LRT)

diate stops a

eda Station, W

.

g existing road

lveda Pass on

ueue jump lan

ard, and San F

rough‐order‐o

eeding furthe

planning staff,

ng, Demand M

nning Study,

epts and any

mation on ke

ssues uncove

ddition, conce

ollowing secti

ept 3 is an aer

nnel) compon

s Rapid Traetween Centu

) line on the s

re proposed

Wilshire Boule

dways will be

n I‐405 (in bo

nes at selecte

Fernando Roa

of‐magnitude

er study. The

, input from t

Modeling, and

and from inp

changes resu

ey design elem

red during th

eptual drawin

ions. In gene

rial viaduct al

nents.

ansit (BRT) ury Boulevard

south to the S

at Nordhoff S

evard (Wests

e enhanced by

th directions

ed intersectio

ad. These enh

P

e cost estimat

e concepts ha

the other

d Environmen

put received a

ulting from

ments,

he course of t

ngs for the

ral, Concepts

ternative, an

d station with

San Fernando

Street, Van N

ide Subway),

y the provisio

), and the

ons along

hancements a

Page 2

tes,

ave

ntal

at

his

s 1

d

the

o

uys

on of

are

SepulvedaEngineeri


Figure

or Systems Plport

e 1. Con

anning Study

ncept 1 At‐Gr

y

rade Van Nuyys/Sepulveda BRT Map

P

Page 3

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.1.1

2.1.

2.1.

2.1.

2.1.2


Key Engine

1.1 Concept The prim

intersect

propose

operatio

reconfig

1.2 GeotechNo unco

Concept

1.3 Construc

No nega

1 may pr

and abili

and tran

Rough-OrdThe majorit

estimates w

cases where

data from s

by Metro p

The unit co

quantified b

typical unit

economies

characterist

mile, where

costs were

and a 30 pe

to account

See the Sep

discussion o

specific ass

estimates.

or Systems Plport

eering Eleme

Design Elememary engineer

tion striping m

d BRT service

ons on I‐405 (t

uration of the

nical Assessmommon geote

1.

ctability Issuetive construc

resent improv

ity to phase in

nsit signal prio

der-of-Magnity of the unit

were provided

e unit costs w

similar project

ersonnel.

sts used for t

by a cost per

factor. Whe

of scale. The

tics of the con

eas some con

adjusted acco

ercent conting

for the prelim

pulveda Pass C

on the costing

umptions and

anning Study

ents

ents ring design el

modifications

e and signing

the north sid

e Orange Line

ment echnical issue

s ctability issues

ved construct

ntersection a

ority.

tude Costs cost factors u

d by the Metr

were not prov

ts and indust

his study rep

mile unit and

re appropriat

e cost estimat

ncept. For ex

cepts were e

ordingly. Last

gency was ap

minary nature

Corridor Syst

g methodolog

d adjustment

y

ements assoc

s associated w

and striping a

e of the Sepu

e Sepulveda s

s are anticipa

s are anticipa

tability due to

nd vehicle im

used to devel

ro Cost Estim

vided by Metr

ry resources,

resent the co

d major featu

te, the unit co

tes have also

xample, the ty

nvisioned to

tly, unit costs

pplied to each

e of this feasib

ems Planning

gy, unit cost v

s applied to d

ciated with C

with queue ju

associated w

ulveda Pass).

station

ated for the ro

ated for Conc

o its limited c

mprovements

lop the rough

ating Departm

ro and the de

, which were

oncepts at a v

res such as tr

osts have bee

been adjuste

ypical Metro

have fewer s

s were develo

h concept’s to

bility level ass

g Study Prelim

values, gener

develop the r

Concept 1 are

ump improvem

ith the bus on

This concept

oadway facili

ept 1, on the

construction n

associated w

h‐order‐of‐ma

ments. There

esign team re

reviewed and

very high leve

ransit station

en adjusted to

ed to reflect t

rail project h

stations per m

oped to reflec

otal applied u

sessment.

minary Cost R

ral assumptio

rough‐order‐o

P

traffic signal

ments for the

n should

t also assume

ties required

contrary, Co

needs, lower

with queue jum

agnitude cost

e were certai

lied up availa

d approved fo

el; alternative

s are assigned

o reflect

the physical

has a station e

mile and the u

ct program co

nit cost in ord

eport for a fu

ns, and conce

of‐magnitude

Page 4

and

e

es the

for

ncept

cost

mps

t

n

able

or use

es are

d a

every

unit

osts

der

ull

ept

e cost

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.1.2

2.1.

2.1.


2.1 Capital CThe majo

estimate

S

a

A

S

The ro

$162M

.2.2 Vehicle

Vehicl

Transit

perfor

sizes r

compo

option

lane fa

transm

transm

(differ

Based

(refurb

service

new ve

.2.3 Operat

Opera

mainte

2013,

Based

part of

year.

or Systems Plport

Cost Estimate or componen

e are:

Shoulder imp

accommodat

Boulevard

At‐grade BRT

Modifications

Priority treat

Sepulveda Bo

ough‐order‐of

M.

e Cost Estimae costs assoc

t service. A p

rmed as part o

eflect the pro

onent associa

ns reflect the

acility across S

mission of exis

mission that c

ing from curr

on the above

bished compa

e, and from $

ehicles respe

tions and Mainting and main

enance cost f

and average

on these inp

f Concept 1, t

anning Study

nts of the con

provements o

te shoulder ru

T Station

s at the Oran

ments, inters

oulevard and

f‐magnitude c

ate iated with Co

lanning‐level

of the Deman

ovision of BRT

ated with the

need for BRT

Sepulveda Pa

sting vehicles

an maintain 4

rent fleet) tha

e consideratio

ared to new v

$4M to $78M

ctively.

ntenance Cosntenance cos

figures as rep

weekday pas

uts, average

the at‐grade S

y

cept used to

on the northb

unning buses

ge Line statio

sections modi

Van Nuys Bo

capital cost es

oncept 1 inclu

calculation fo

nd Modeling t

T service acro

vehicle cost e

T service to m

ass. The first f

s in Metro’s fl

45 mph and t

at can mainta

on, vehicle co

vehicle purcha

for the high r

t Estimate t estimates w

orted in the M

senger mile r

annual opera

Sepulveda Bo

develop the

ound and sou

from Ventura

on

ifications, and

ulevard

stimate for C

ude vehicles f

or both a low

task order. Th

oss the Sepulv

estimates, is

aintain a 45 m

fleet option re

leet with a m

the other is fo

ain 45mph acr

osts for Conce

ase) for the e

range of BRT

were develope

Metro Propos

results from t

ating costs for

oulevard BRT,

rough‐order‐

uthbound I‐40

a Boulevard t

d queue jump

Concept 1 is a

for the propo

w and high ran

he low and hi

veda Pass. Th

fleet type. Tw

mph speed in

eplaces the e

ore powerful

or the purcha

ross the Sepu

ept 1 range fr

estimated low

service, for r

ed using the o

sed Budget fo

the demand m

r BRT operati

, were estima

P

‐of‐magnitude

05 to

to Sepulveda

p lanes along

nticipated to

sed Bus Rapid

nge fleet size

igh range flee

he second

wo different f

n the manage

engine and

l engine and

ase of new ve

ulveda Pass.

rom $2M to $

w range of BR

refurbished an

operating and

or Fiscal Year

modeling effo

ons included

ated at $96M

Page 5

e cost

be

d

was

et

fleet

d

hicles

$37M

T

nd

d

orts.

as

per

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.1.3

2.2 AC

in

A

o

ge

lim

o

A

La

d

d

la

p

w

ea

la

Th

A

m

ei

a

lo

40

ac

fr

B

vi

la

la

th


Issues for Further inq

and operate

undertaken

shoulder op

transit signa

At-Grade Freoncept 2 wou

nterchange in

venue, I‐405

ccupancy toll

eneral purpos

mit freeway w

nly be one m

t the point w

a Grange Ave

irection of tra

irect access r

anes to US‐10

rovided for a

westbound on

astbound on

anes via a dire

he southern D

venue, just so

managed lanes

ither be unde

connection f

ocal streets (B

05) would be

ccess to adjac

rontage roads

RT vehicles u

ia direct acce

anes of I‐405

ane on and of

he managed l

or Systems Plport

Further Inveuiries and inv

e the roadwa

n to understan

perations and

al priority me

eeway Manauld implemen

the north to

is proposed t

(HOT) lanes

se lanes wou

widening. No

anaged HOT

here the man

nue), one of

avel) to a con

amp connect

01 serving traf

reas east of I‐

US‐101 or co

US‐101 woul

ect access ram

Direct Access

outh of Santa

s in the medi

er or over I‐40

or managed l

Beloit Avenue

converted to

cent properti

s).

tilizing the I‐4

ss ramps. The

using a new u

ff ramps. Stan

anes could al

anning Study

stigation andvestigation w

ay facilities pr

nd each agen

d intersection

easures.

aged Lanesnt managed la

the I‐105 int

to consist of f

in each direc

ld be to main

orth of US‐101

lane in each d

naged lanes t

the managed

necting road

tion to US‐101

ffic with origi

‐405). As suc

ontinue north

d have the op

mp connectio

Ramp conne

a Monica Bou

an of I‐405 w

05). Ramps o

lanes traffic t

e on the west

o one way str

es (other des

405 managed

e proposed d

undercrossing

ndard in‐lane

lso be provide

y

d Analysis ith Caltrans a

oposed for th

ncy’s particula

signal, signin

s ane operation

erchange in t

five general p

tion. A possi

ntain the four

1 and south o

direction.

ransition from

d lanes will be

way using dir

1 would prov

ns or destina

ch, traffic goin

hbound on I‐4

ption of direc

n.

ection is prop

levard. In thi

with a structur

on the outside

o the adjacen

side of I‐405

eets, but kep

sign options m

d lanes are pro

esign would a

g and then ac

ingress and e

ed at standar

and other mu

he new BRT s

ar requiremen

ng and stripin

ns in the cent

the south. Be

purpose (GP)

ble exception

r lane section

of Santa Mon

m two lanes t

e dropped or

rect access ra

vide a connect

ations west of

ng northboun

405 dependin

ctly entering t

osed to be co

is scenario, ra

re to La Grang

e of each side

nt local street

and Cotner A

pt at their exis

may allow for

oposed acces

allow buses t

ccess the man

egress from t

rd Caltrans int

nicipal agenc

ervice will ne

nts for implem

ng changes fo

ter lanes of I‐4

etween US‐10

lanes and two

n to the provi

in the southb

ica Boulevard

to one lane (a

added (depe

amps. At the

tion from the

f I‐405 (no co

nd on I‐405 w

ng on lane sel

the I‐405 sout

onstructed at

amps would c

ge Avenue (co

e of the freew

ts. As design

Avenue on th

sting elevatio

two‐way traf

ss to the Oran

o travel unde

naged lanes o

he general pu

tervals. Simi

P

cies that main

eed to be

menting bus

r queue jump

405 from the

01 and La Gra

o managed, h

ision of five

bound directi

d, there woul

at US‐101 and

nding on the

north end, a

e I‐405 manag

nnections

would be able

ection and tr

thbound man

La Grange

connect the

onnection co

way would pro

ed, the adjac

e east side of

on to maintain

ffic on the

nge Line Busw

er the northb

on I‐405 via ce

urpose lanes

larly, addition

Page 6

ntain

on

p and

e I‐5

ange

high

ion to

d

d at

ged

to go

affic

naged

uld

ovide

cent

f I‐

n

way

ound

enter

to

nal

SepulvedaEngineeri

ac

al


ccess to the m

lso be provide

Figure

or Systems Plport

managed lane

ed via additio

e 2. Con

anning Study

es (north and

onal direct acc

ncept 2 At‐Gr

y

south of the

cess ramps.

rade Freeway

two‐lane Sep

y Managed La

pulveda Pass

anes

P

section) coul

Page 7

d

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.2.1

2.2.

2.2.

2.2.

2.2.2


Key Engine

.1.1 ConceThe pr

lane o

majori

existin

the Se

The sin

of tolli

constr

constr

the we

associa

requir

Line, a

lanes t

direct

crossin

anticip

.1.2 Geotec

No unc

Conce

.1.3 ConstrConstr

mainli

to imp

Consid

constr

Rough-OrdSee Section

used when

Systems Pla

or Systems Plport

eering Eleme

pt Design Elerimary design

perations fro

ity of the dist

ng HOV lane, w

pulveda Pass

ngle lane sect

ing equipmen

ruction of the

ruction of dire

est, and at La

ated with the

e additional r

additional righ

to the west, a

access ramps

ng Sepulveda

pated to rema

chnical Assescommon geo

pt 2.

ructability Issuruction of th

ne construct

pact traffic op

derable traffic

ruction activit

der-of-Magnin 2.1.3 of this

developing t

anning Study

anning Study

ents

ments elements for

m approxima

tance betwee

with a core se

s from the US

tions require

nt for manage

two‐lane seg

ect access ram

Grange Aven

e single lane o

right‐of‐way f

ht of way will

and additiona

s from the US

Pass. The pr

ain within the

ssment otechnical issu

ues e direct acce

ion required

perations on I

c control and

ties.

tude Costs report for a b

he rough‐ord

Preliminary C

y

r this concept

ately the I‐5 in

en I‐5 and I‐10

egment of tw

‐101 to La Gr

signing and s

ed lane opera

gment of the

mps to conne

nue, as well a

operations. C

for two of the

be required

al right‐of‐way

S‐101 will join

roposed direc

e existing I‐40

ues are antici

ess ramp str

to accommo

‐405 and all a

mitigation m

brief discussio

der‐of‐magnit

Cost Report fo

t include the

n the north to

05 would be a

wo‐lane opera

range Avenue

striping chang

ations. Design

managed lan

ect to the Ora

s the signing,

Construction o

e three propo

to shift the n

y will be requ

n the two‐lane

ct access ram

05 right‐of‐wa

pated for the

ructures and

odate the dire

adjacent and

measures are

on of the met

tude costs or

or a more in‐d

implementat

o the I‐105 in

a single lane c

ation (in each

e.

ges, as well as

n elements re

nes concept w

nge Line, US‐

, striping and

of the direct a

osed locations

orthbound m

uired to widen

e section of m

ps at La Gran

ay envelope.

e roadway fac

any associat

ect access fa

intersecting

expected to b

thodology an

the Sepulved

depth discuss

P

tion of manag

the south. T

conversion of

direction) ac

s the installat

equired for th

would require

‐101 to and fr

tolling eleme

access ramp w

s. At the Ora

mainline I‐405

n I‐405 where

managed lane

nge Avenue ar

cilities require

ted I‐405 fre

cilities is exp

roadway fac

be required d

nd assumption

da Pass Corrid

sion.

Page 8

ged

The

f the

cross

tion

e

e

rom

ents

will

nge

5

e the

es

re

ed for

eeway

pected

ilities.

during

ns

dor

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.2.

2.2.

2.2.

2.2.3


.2.1 CapitaThe m

cost es

C

a

T

t

The ro

$1.6B

$1.1B

.2.2 Vehicle

Vehicl

BRT se

lower

(refurb

BRT se

.2.3 Operat

Opera

mainte

weekd

Pass C

costs f

lanes,

Issues for Further traf

particularly

as for the si

or Systems Plport

l Cost Estimatajor compon

stimate are:

Direct Access

Construction

and tolling eq

The incorpora

the Sepulved

ough‐order‐of

with $0.5B be

attributed to


ervice is the s

range of BR

bished and ne

ervice, again f

tion and Maintting and ma

enance cost

day passenge

Corridor Syste

for BRT opera

were estimat

Further Inveffic analysis is

y at the two to

ingle lane sec

anning Study

te ents of the co

s Ramps at th

of express la

quipment;

ation of the B

a Pass (Van N

f‐magnitude c

eing attribute

the highway

ate ciated with Co

same for both

RT service ac

ew vehicles re

for refurbishe

tenance Cost intenance co

from the Me

r miles result

ems Planning

ations includ

ted $138M pe

stigation ands needed to b

o one lane tra

ctions to the n

y

oncept used t

e Orange Line

nes which wo

BRT improvem

Nuys and Sepu

capital cost es

ed to the tran

y based comp

oncept 2 are

h concepts. A

cross Sepulve

espectively) a

ed and new ve

Estimate ost estimates

etro Proposed

ts from the d

Study. Based

ed as part of

er year.

d Analysis better underst

ansition point

north of US‐1

to develop th

e Busway, US

ould include r

ments from C

ulveda Boule

stimate for C

nsit‐only com

onents.

the same as

As noted for C

eda Pass is e

and from $4M

ehicles respe

s were devel

d Budget for

demand mod

d on these in

f Concept 2, t

tand expecte

ts at US‐101 a

101 and south

he rough‐orde

S‐101, and La

restriping, ph

Concept 1 for

vard).

Concept 2 is a

ponents of th

for Concept 1

Concept 1, ve

estimated fro

M to $78M fo

ectively.

oped using t

r Fiscal Year

deling efforts

puts, average

the at‐grade

ed managed la

and La Grang

h of La Grange

P

er‐of‐magnitu

Grange Aven

hysical barrier

areas outside

nticipated to

he concept an

1, as the prop

ehicle costs fo

om $2M to

r the high ran

the operating

2013 and av

for the Sepu

e annual ope

freeway man

ane operation

e Avenue, as

e Avenue.

Page 9

ude

nue

rs,

e of

be

nd

posed

or the

$37M

nge of

g and

verage

ulveda

rating

naged

ns,

well

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.3 ATh

40

fo

ar

ce

b

A

B

w

ov

d

G

A


Aerial Viaduhe highway v

05 between t

our managed

rea of the I‐40

enter running

ound directio

ccess to the h

oulevard, at U

would begin at

ver US‐101 w

estinations w

range Avenu

venue.

or Systems Plport

ct Managedviaduct propo

the US‐101 to

lanes (two in

05 freeway.

g columns, ut

ons.

highway viad

US‐101 and a

t Burbank Bo

with direct acc

west of I‐405,

e where an a

anning Study

d Lanes sed for Conce

o the I‐10. Th

n each directio

As designed,

ilizing 5 feet o

uct is propose

southern acc

ulevard wher

cess ramp con

travel across

erial T‐ramp

y

ept 3 is an ele

e conceptual

on) and woul

the structure

of inside shou

ed in three lo

cess point at

re it would co

nnections to U

the pass and

would provid

evated guidew

l aerial viaduc

ld be constru

e would be su

ulder from th

ocations, nort

La Grange Av

onnect to the

US‐101 for tr

d south to the

de connection

way above th

ct structure w

cted in the m

upported by 1

he exiting nor

th of US‐101 a

venue. The el

existing over

avelers with o

e proposed te

ns to local str

Pa

he median of

would consist

median/should

10 foot wide

th and south

at Burbank

evated struct

rcrossing, pas

origins or

erminus at La

eets via La Gr

age 10

the I‐

of

der

ture

ss

range

SepulvedaEngineeri


Figure

or Systems Plport

e 3. Con

anning Study

ncept 3 Aeria

y

al Viaduct Managed Lanes

Pa

age 11

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.3.1

2.3.

2.3.

2.3.

2.3.2

2.3.


Key Engine

.1.1 ConceThe pr

associa

Grange

design

.1.2 Geotec

While

requir

accura

structu

.1.3 Constr

Constr

expect

Consid

constr


used when

Systems Pla

.2.1 Capita

The m

cost es

C

G

T

t

The ro

$2.3B

$2.2B

or Systems Plport

eering Eleme


ated direct ac

e Avenue. Co

ned, are antic

chnical Assesno uncomm

ed for Conce

ately portray

ure of this siz

ructability Issuruction of th

ted to impac

derable traffic

ruction activit


developing t

anning Study


stimate were

Construction

Grange Aven

Direct Access

The incorpora

the elevated

ough‐order‐of

with $0.13B b

attributed to

anning Study

ents

ments elements for

ccess structur

onstruction o

ipated to req

ssment mon geotech

ept 3, geolog

y any geotec

e.

ues he aerial via

ct traffic ope

c control and

ties.


he rough‐ord

Preliminary C

te ents of the co

:

of a four‐lan

ue;

s Ramps at Bu

ation of the B

viaduct struc

f‐magnitude c

being attribut

the highway

y

r this concept

res and ramp

f the propose

uire addition

nical issues

gic and seism

chnical or se

duct and as

erations on I‐

mitigation m

brief discussio

der‐of‐magnit

Cost Report fo

oncept used t

e elevated gu

urbank Avenu

BRT improvem

cture (Van Nu

capital cost es

ted to the tra

y based comp

t is the aerial

ps at Burbank

ed direct acce

nal right‐of‐wa

are anticipat

mic issues sh

eismic issues

ssociated dire

‐405 and all

measures are

on of the met

tude costs or

or a more in‐d

to develop th

uideway betw

ue, US‐101 an

ments from C

uys and Sepulv

stimate for C

ansit‐only com

onents.

viaduct struc

Boulevard, U

ess locations,

ay.

ted for the

hould be ana

associated

ect access r

connecting

expected to b

thodology an

the Sepulved

depth discuss

he rough‐orde

ween Burbank

nd La Grange

Concept 1 for

veda Bouleva

Concept 3 is a

mponents of t

Pa

cture and

US‐101 and La

as currently

roadway fac

alyzed in dep

with an ele

amp structu

roadway fac

be required d

nd assumption

da Pass Corrid

sion.

er‐of‐magnitu

k Avenue and

Avenue; and

areas outside

ard).

nticipated to

the concept a

age 12

a

cilities

pth to

evated

res is

ilities.

during

ns

dor

ude

d La

e of

be

and

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.3.

2.3.

2.3.3


.2.2 VehicleVehicl

propos

costs f

$37M

range

.2.3 Operat

Opera

transp

Issues for If Concept 3

An aerial via

adjacent to

particularly

Sepulveda P

Additional e

feasibility o

ability to pr

interchange

Further traf

required at

understand

somewhat

exit points t

exit points t

Lastly, a hi

Widening P

seismic ass

be expecte

regarding s

or Systems Plport


sed BRT servi

for the lower

(refurbished

of BRT servic

tion and Maintting and main

portation dem

Further Inve3 is progresse

aduct is antic

the I‐405 fre

y challenging c

Pass Widenin

engineering is

of using a sing

rovide the ne

e to provide t

ffic analyses n

the proposed

d the operatio

more challen

to the viaduc

that could be

ghway viadu

Project, and

essment of in

ed that any

eismic issues

anning Study

ate ciated with Co

ice is the sam

range of BRT

and new veh

e, again for r

tenance Cost ntenance cos

mand modelin

stigation anded, communit

cipated to cre

eeway and co

coming on th

g Project.

ssues for furt

gle column str

eded clearan

the connector

needs to be p

d access and

onal feasibility

ging for Conc

t facility, as c

e provided fro

ct concept w

was ultimate

ndividual con

further study

.

y

oncept 3 are

me for all conc

T service acro

hicles respec

efurbished an

Estimate t estimates w

ng efforts wer

d Analysis ty based impa

eate visual qu

mmunity imp

e heels of the

ther analysis a

ructural appr

ces from exis

r from northb

performed to

egress locatio

y of the conce

cept 3 than fo

compared to t

om the adjace

was considere

ely withdraw

ncepts was no

y on this co

the same as

cepts. As not

oss Sepulveda

ctively) and fr

nd new vehic

were not calcu

re not undert

acts would ne

ality impacts

pacts during c

e current con

and investiga

oach for the

sting structur

bound I‐405 t

determine th

ons to the ele

ept. Traffic m

or Concept 2,

the potential

ent general pu

ed in the EIR

n due to sei

ot completed

oncept would

s for Concept

ted for Conce

a Pass is estim

rom $4M to $

cles respective

ulated for Co

taken for this

eed to be ana

to residents

construction m

nstruction of t

ation include a

aerial viaduct

es within the

to eastbound

he traffic dem

evated viaduc

management

due to the li

for intermed

urpose lanes

R for the I‐40

ismic safety

d as part of th

d result in s

Pa

1, 2, and 4 a

ept 1 and 2, ve

mated from $2

$78M for the

ely.

ncept 3, as

Concept.

alyzed and ass

and business

may prove to

the I‐405

analyzing the

t structure, a

e US‐101

US‐101.

mand and cap

ct to better

may be

mited entry a

diate entry an

under Conce

05 Sepulveda

concerns. W

his study, it w

imilar conclu

age 13

as the

ehicle

2M to

e high

sess.

ses

o be

e

nd

pacity

and

nd

ept 2.

a Pass

hile a

would

usions

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.4 TC

tw

cr

o

in

Th

th

lo

te


Tolled Highwoncept 4 wou

wo lanes of h

ross section c

n a lower leve

nclude both a

he tunnel alig

hrough the Sa

oosely followi

erminus of th

or Systems Plport

way Tunnel uld construct

ighway traffic

consisting of e

el, or two sep

utos and bus

gnment would

anta Monica M

ng the I‐405

e tunnel wou

anning Study

a bored tunn

c in each dire

either a single

parate bores w

es. A graphic

d begin near

Mountains, th

roadway (app

uld be located

y

nel under the

ction. The to

e bore with tw

with two lane

c depicting Co

the I‐405/US

hen south‐so

proximately 9

d near La Gran

Santa Monic

olled tunnel c

wo lanes on a

es in each bor

oncept 4 is sh

‐101 intercha

utheast throu

9 miles). Simi

nge Avenue.

ca Mountains

oncept is ant

an upper leve

re. Traffic in

hown on the f

ange and wou

ugh Century C

ilar to Concep

Pa

that would c

ticipated to ha

el and two lan

the tunnel w

following pag

uld extend so

City east of an

pt 2, the sout

age 14

carry

ave a

nes

would

ge.

uth

nd

thern

SepulvedaEngineeri


Figure

or Systems Plport

e 4. Con

anning Study

ncept 4 Tolled

y

d Highway Tuunnel

Pa

age 15

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.4.1

2.4.


Key Engine

.1.1 ConceThe pr

portal

the US

for tra

101 tu

portals

second

single

Figure

vertica

or Systems Plport

eering Eleme


structures ne

S‐101 intercha

ffic coming fr

unnel portal c

s with flyover

d would be in

tunnel.

e 5. Typical cro

al egress poin

anning Study

ents

ments elements for

ear US‐101 an

ange, one for

rom US‐101 t

onnections, t

r ramps (direc

ndependent t

oss‐section: S

nts.

y

r Concept 4 a

nd La Grange

r traffic comin

o the west. T

the first conn

ct access ram

unnels to I‐40

Single bore tu

are the tunne

Avenue. Tw

ng to and from

Two concepts

ects I‐405 an

mps) to a singl

05 and US‐10

unnel (stacked

l structure an

o tunnel port

m I‐405 to the

s were develo

d US‐101 wit

e, large bore

01 that would

d roadway) a

Pa

nd the tunnel

tals are neede

e north and o

oped for the U

h the tunnel

tunnel, and t

later join int

lternative wit

age 16

ed at

one

US‐

the

to a

th

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.4.


Figure 6. T

emergency

.1.2 Geotec

Site sp

orient

widely

while e

The ali

potent

Northr

fault r

slope s

furthe

evalua

In add

include

topple

design

be des

tunnel

tunnel

structu

Additio

Evalua

or Systems Plport

Typical cross‐s

y egress.

chnical Assespecific geolog

ation of majo

y varying grou

establishing a

ignment is loc

tially active fa

ridge Hill in 1

upture, seism

stability at po

r evaluation.

ated during de

ition to seism

e oil field rela

e (which could

n must consid

signed to acco

l connects to

l crosses a fau

ure may be co

onal informat

ation Memora

anning Study

section: twin

ssment ical and envir

or seismic fau

und water in t

a desired align

cated in a sei

aults in the ar

994 and San

mic shaking, li

ortals as well

Potential dis

esign.

mic hazards, o

ated hazards,

d impact port

er the geoha

ommodate th

portals, shaft

ult that has p

onsidered to

tion regarding

andum (Metr

y

tunnel altern

ronmental co

lts, historical

the study cor

nment profile

smically activ

rea. Two of th

Fernando in 1

quefaction an

as liquefactio

placements a

other geologic

expansive an

tals and to a l

zards describ

he anticipated

ts and cross p

otential for a

accommodat

g geotechnica

o, June 20, 20

native with cr

onsiderations

oil fields, fav

rridor levels re

e for the selec

ve region and

hese faults ha

1971. Therefo

nd landslides

on potential o

along the exis

c hazards that

nd collapsible

esser extent,

bed above. Fo

d seismic mov

passages. In e

an abrupt disp

te the movem

al issues can

012).

ross passage c

such as locat

vorable geolo

egime are of

cted route.

d there are nu

ad major eart

ore seismic h

need to be e

of portal struc

sting faults ne

t exist in the

e soils, and la

, ventilation s

or example, t

vements, esp

extreme case

placement), a

ment.

be found in t

Pa

connections f

tions and

ogical formatio

great import

umerous

thquakes – No

azards such a

evaluated. Se

ctures will req

eed to be

project area

ndslides/rock

shafts). The t

unnel joints m

pecially where

es (e.g., if the

an oversized

he Geotechn

age 17

for

ons,

ance

orth

as

eismic

quire

k

unnel

must

e the

ical

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.4.

2.4.2

2.4.

2.4.


.1.3 Constr

Constr

retriev

machi

constr

S

s

T

c

t

T

4

T

e

a

S

d


used when

Systems Pla

.2.1 Capita

The m

cost es

A

T

A low

alignm

assum

mile tu

cost es

$12.9B

.2.2 Vehicle

Vehicl

propos

or Systems Plport

ructability Issuructability iss

val of the tun

ne for a single

ructability issu

Siting accepta

staging areas

The need to s

northbound I

construction

the bored tun

The southern

405 freeway

portal.

The removal,

excavated so

approximatel

Siting of vent

densely deve


developing t

anning Study


stimate are:

A large diame

Tunnel porta

range and hig

ment, with the

ed economy

unnel from w

stimate for Co

B.


sed BRT servi

anning Study

ues ues associate

nel boring ma

e, large‐bore

ues include, b

able portal lo

s required to l

separate traff

I‐405 and wes

of diverging c

nnel.

n tunnel porta

mainline lane

transport an

il resulting fro

ly 7.6 million

tilation plants

eloped urban


he rough‐ord

Preliminary C

te ents of the co

eter bore tun

ls and approa

gh range estim

e low range co

of scale asso

which the cost

oncept 4 rang

ate ciated with C

ice is the sam

y

ed with Conce

achine, the la

tunnel. Furt

but are not lim

ocations at ea

launch and re

fic in the nort

stbound US‐1

cut‐and‐cove

al connection

es to create s

nd identificati

om the bored

cubic yards.

s and associat

environment

brief discussio

der‐of‐magnit

Cost Report fo

oncept used t

nel; and

aches on eith

mate were de

ost represent

ciated a tunn

s were based

ged from a lo

Concept 4 are

me for all conc

ept 4 are mai

aunch, retriev

her detail on

mited to the f

ch end of the

etrieve the tu

thbound tunn

101, which is

er portal boxe

s at La Grang

ufficient spac

on of locatio

d tunnel cons

ted appurten

t.

on of the met

tude costs or

or a more in‐d

to develop th

er end of the

eveloped for

ting a 20 perc

nel of this leng

d). The rough

ow range of $

e the same a

cepts. As not

nly surroundi

val and use of

these and ot

following item

e tunnel to pr

unnel boring m

nel into two d

expected to r

ed sections th

ge may requir

ce in the med

ns in which to

struction, whi

ant tunnel st

thodology an

the Sepulved

depth discuss

he rough‐orde

e tunnel.

the tunnel po

cent reductio

gth (as comp

h‐order‐of‐ma

10.4B to a hig

as for Concep

ted for Conce

Pa

ing the launc

f a tunnel bor

ther

ms:

rovide sufficie

machine.

directions,

require

hat will interfa

re shifting of t

dian for a tun

o deposit the

ich is estimat

ructures with

nd assumption

da Pass Corrid

sion.

er‐of‐magnitu

ortions of the

n to reflect a

ared to a 1 to

agnitude capi

gh estimate o

pt 1 and 2, a

ept 1 and 2, ve

age 18

h and

ring

ent

ace

the I‐

nel

ed at

hin a

ns

dor

ude

e

n

o 2

tal

of

as the

ehicle

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.4.

2.4.3


costs f

$37M

range

.2.3 Operat

Opera

mainte

averag

Sepulv

operat

tunnel

Issues for Further ana

favorable co

reduce traff

Tunnel and

to determin

adjacent to

In addition,

Concept 4 t

facilities. A

determine t

better asse

and egress

or Systems Plport

for the lower

(refurbished

of BRT servic


enance costs

ge weekday p

veda Pass Cor

ting costs for

l, were estima

Further Invealysis is neede

onstruction s

fic impacts an

tunnel porta

ne to minimiz

the tunnel a

as noted for

than for Conc

As noted for C

the traffic de

ss (tunnel and

locations.

anning Study

range of BRT

and new veh

e, again for r


reported in t

passenger mil

rridor System

BRT operatio

ated $127M p

stigation anded regarding

taging schem

nd lane closu

al constructio

ze the impact

nd tunnel po

Concept 3, t

cept 2, due to

Concepts 2 an

mand and ca

d local street

y

T service acro

hicles respec

efurbished an


the Metro Pro

es results fro

s Planning St

ons included a

per year.

d Analysis possible port

mes that woul

res.

n near existin

s to foundatio

rtals.

raffic manage

o the limited e

d 3, further t

pacity require

) operational

oss Sepulveda

ctively) and fr

nd new vehic

were develope

oposed Budge

om the deman

udy. Based o

as part of Con

tal configurat

d minimize ri

ng structures

ons of the ex

ement is som

entry and exis

traffic analyse

ed at the pro

feasibility of

a Pass is estim

rom $4M to $

cles respective

ed using the o

et for Fiscal Y

nd modeling e

on these inpu

ncept 4, the t

ions in order

ight‐of‐way re

will require a

xisting structu

mewhat more

st points to th

es needs to be

oposed portal

f the concept

Pa

mated from $2

$78M for the

ely.

operating and

Year 2013 and

efforts for the

ts, average a

tolled highwa

to examine

equirements

additional ana

ures that are

challenging f

he tunnel

e performed

locations to

and the acce

age 19

2M to

e high

d

d

e

nnual

ay

and

alyses

for

to

ess

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.5 FC

an

Sy

so

St

A

V

M

tr

w

o

Th

w

M

C

to


ixed-Guideoncept 5 pro

nd the Los An

ylmar/San Fe

outh. Fifteen

tarting at the

ntelope Valle

entura Boule

Monica Mount

ravel south on

would continu

r Green Line a

here are two

would run at g

Monica Mount

entury Aviati

o run entirely

or Systems Plport

way Light Rposes a rail li

ngeles Airport

rnando Metr

stations are p

Sylmar Metr

ey tracks befo

vard where it

tains to a por

n Westwood

e south to Se

at the Centur

options asso

grade in the S

tains, and the

on Station ne

y in a tunnel c

anning Study

Rail or Heavne connectin

t. The line wo

olink station

proposed wit

rolink station,

ore turning so

t would enter

rtal location s

Boulevard to

epulveda Bou

ry Aviation St

ciated with th

an Fernando

en run in an a

ear LAX. Conc

configuration,

y

vy Rail Tunng the San Fer

ould extend a

in the north t

h station spa

, the rail align

outh onto Van

r a tunnel por

south of Santa

Overland Av

levard where

ation.

his concept, C

Valley, trave

at‐grade confi

cept 5B is a h

, following th

nel rnando Valley

approximatel

to the Centur

cing that is ge

nment would

n Nuys Boulev

rtal and trave

a Monica Bou

venue. From

e it would con

Concept 5A is

l in a tunnel c

iguration thro

eavy rail align

e same alignm

y with the We

y 28 miles an

ry Aviation St

enerally 2 mi

run parallel t

vard and trav

el underneath

ulevard. The

Overland Ave

nnect to the M

s a light rail al

configuration

ough West Lo

nment that h

ment.

Pa

est Los Angele

nd connect th

tation to the

les apart.

to the existing

veling south to

h the Santa

rail line woul

enue, the line

Metro Crensh

lignment that

n under the Sa

os Angeles to

as been assu

age 20

es

e

g

o

d

e

haw

t

anta

the

med

SepulvedaEngineeri


Figure

or Systems Plport

e 7. Con

anning Study

ncept 5 Fixed

y

d Guideway Liight Rail or Heeavy Rail Tun

Pa

nel

age 21

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.5.1

2.5.

2.5.

2.5.


Key Engine

.1.1 ConceThe m

track

include

underg

a main

.1.2 Geotec

As dis

such a

geolog

are ne

route.

The ali

potent

Northr

fault r

slope s

furthe

evalua

In add

include

topple

design

be des

tunnel

tunnel

structu

Additio

Evalua

.1.3 Constr

The co

for Co

would

or Systems Plport

eering Eleme

pt Design Elemajor design

and necessar

es dual bor

ground statio

ntenance faci

chnical Assescussed for C

as locations a

gical formatio

ecessary to co

ignment is loc

tially active fa

ridge Hill in 1

upture, seism

stability at po

r evaluation.

ated during th

ition to seism

e oil field rela

e (which could

n must consid

signed to acco

l connects to

l crosses a fau

ure may be co

onal informat

ation Memora

ructability Issuonstructability

oncept 4, with

require the s

anning Study

ents

ments components

ry associated

re tunnels a

on. Both Con

lity.

ssment oncept 4, sit

and orientatio

ons, widely va

onsider when

cated in a sei

aults in the ar

994 and San

mic shaking, li

ortals as well

Potential dis

he design of t

mic hazards, o

ated hazards,

d impact port

er the geoha

ommodate th

portals, shaft

ult that has p

onsidered to

tion regarding

andum (Metr

ues y issues assoc

h the excepti

siting of a new

y

associated w

d facilities sy

and necessar

cept 5A and

te specific ge

on of major s

arying groun

establishing

smically activ

rea. Two of th

Fernando in 1

quefaction an

as liquefactio

placements a

he tunnel.

other geologic

expansive an

tals and to a l

zards describ

he anticipated

ts and cross p

otential for a

accommodat

g geotechnica

o, June 20, 20

ciated with C

ion of the fre

w maintenanc

with Concept

ystems and a

ry associated

Concept 5B h

eological and

seismic faults

d water in th

a desired alig

ve region and

hese faults ha

1971. Therefo

nd landslides

on potential o

along the exis

c hazards that

nd collapsible

esser extent,

bed above; fo

d seismic mov

passages. In e

an abrupt disp

te the movem

al issues can

012).

oncept 5 are

eeway conne

ce and yard s

t 5A include

at‐grade stati

d facilities a

have also assu

environmen

s, historical o

he study corr

gnment profi

d there are nu

ad major eart

ore seismic h

need to be e

of portal struc

sting faults ne

t exist in the

e soils, and la

, ventilation s

r example tu

vements, esp

extreme case

placement), a

ment.

be found in t

very similar

ections. How

shop facility.

Pa

at‐grade ligh

ions. Conce

and systems

umed the nee

ntal considera

oil fields, favo

ridor levels re

ile for the sel

umerous

thquakes – No

azards such a

evaluated. Se

ctures will req

eed to be

project area

ndslides/rock

shafts). The t

nnel joints m

pecially where

es (e.g., if the

an oversized

he Geotechn

to those disc

wever, this co

age 22

ht rail

pt 5B

s and

ed for

ations

orable

egime

ected

orth

as

eismic

quire

k

unnel

ust

e the

ical

ussed

ncept

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.5.2

2.5.

2.5.

2.5.


It sho

constr

mitiga


used when

Systems Pla

.2.1 Capita

Based

concep

an at‐g

approx

assum

and th

concep

A

A

A

A low

alignm

assum

magni

$8.3B

“heavy

.2.2 Vehicle

Vehicl

overal

.2.3 OperatOpera

mainte

averag

Sepulv

operat

or Systems Plport

uld also be

ruction of LR

tes some of t


developing t

anning Study

l Cost Estimaton direction

pt option and

grade configu

ximately Sant

ed to operate

he heavy rail c

pt used to de

At‐grade light

At‐grade tran

Dual bore tun

Underground

A maintenanc

range and hig

ment, with the

ed economy

tude capital c

for the light r

y rail” concep

e Cost Estimae cost associa

l per mile cap


enance costs

ge weekday p

veda Pass Cor

ting costs for

anning Study

noted that

RT facilities,

the identified


he rough‐ord

Preliminary C

te from Charret

d a heavy rail

uration on eit

ta Monica Bo

e in a tunnel

concept optio

velop the rou

t rail

nsit stations

nnels

d transit statio

ce facility

gh range estim

e low range co

of scale asso

cost estimate

rail concept o

pt option.

ate ated with the

pital costs dis


as reported i

passenger mil

rridor System

the two rail o

y

Metro has e

including 20

risks associa

brief discussio

der‐of‐magnit

Cost Report fo

tte 2, cost est

concept opti

her side of th

ulevard. The

configuration

ons include 14

ugh‐order‐of‐

ons

mate were de

ost represent

ciated a tunn

e for Concept

option to a hig

e proposed ra

cussed above


in the Metro

es results fro

s Planning St

options (LRT a

extensive exp

foot diame

ated with Con

on of the met

tude costs or

or a more in‐d

timates were

on. The light

he tunnel from

e “heavy rail”

n for the entir

4 stations. Th

‐magnitude co

eveloped for

ting a 20 perc

nel of this leng

5 ranged fro

gh estimate o

il service for

e.

were develope

Proposed Bu

om the deman

udy. Based o

and heavy ra

perience wit

ter transit ra

ncept 4.

thodology an

the Sepulved

depth discuss

developed fo

t rail option w

m Ventura Bo

concept opti

re length. Bo

he major com

ost estimate

the tunnel po

cent reductio

gth. The roug

m a low rang

of $13.6B to $

Concept 5, ar

ed using the o

dget for Fisca

nd modeling e

on these inpu

il) included as

Pa

h the design

ail tunnels, w

nd assumption

da Pass Corrid

sion.

or a light rail

would operate

oulevard to

on (5B) is

oth the light r

mponents of t

are:

ortions of the

n to reflect a

gh‐order‐of‐

e of $7.4B to

$17.5B for the

re included in

operating and

al Year 2013 a

efforts for the

ts, average a

s part of Conc

age 23

n and

which

ns

dor

e in

ail

he

e

n

e

n the

d

and

e

nnual

cept

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.5.3


5, rang

for hea

Issues for Constructio

require righ

reaches the

somewhat

of the track

portal dime

configuratio

minimize rig

Siting of a n

highly deve

or Systems Plport

ged from an e

avy rail opera

Further Inveon of the port

ht of way acq

e minimum co

less, dependi

k center to ce

ensions and sh

ons in order t

ght‐of‐way re

new maintena

eloped urban

anning Study

estimated $14

ations.

stigation andtal location w

uisitions. The

over required

ng on ground

nter of 39’. F

hape. Furthe

to examine fa

equirements a

ance and yard

area.

y

42M per year

d Analysis ill require lay

e portal woul

d for tunnels w

d conditions.

Further geolo

er analysis is n

avorable cons

and reduce tr

d shop facility

r for light rail

ydown areas t

d be a flared

which is gene

The box wou

ogic studies w

needed regar

struction stag

raffic impacts

y may be cha

operations to

that may imp

box construc

erally one tun

uld flare to re

would determ

rding possible

ging schemes

s and lane clo

llenging with

Pa

o $188M per

pact property

ction until it

nel diameter

each the full w

ine the actua

e portal

that would

osures.

in the corrido

age 24

year

and

r, or

width

al

or’s

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.6 TC

th

se

Th

n

n

o

fr

n

10

Th

n

C


Toll Tunnel aoncept 6 wo

hrough the Sa

ervice.

he proposed

orthern port

ear Century B

ne lane in ea

rom eastbou

orthbound I‐

01, south acr

he private sh

orthern term

entury Aviati

or Systems Plport

and Rail Tuuld be very s

anta Monica M

highway tun

al at approxi

Boulevard. Fr

ach direction.

nd US‐101,

405. The hig

oss Sepulved

huttle/rail tu

minus at the V

on Station th

anning Study

nnel similar to Con

Mountains an

nnel would b

imately Rosco

rom Roscoe B

A second lan

while a nort

ghway tunne

a Pass and to

unnel would

Van Nuys Me

at roughly pa

y

ncepts 4 and

nd also includ

be longer tha

oe Boulevard

Boulevard to

ne would be

thbound lan

l would cons

o the southern

be shorter t

etroLink Stati

arallels I‐405.

5, as it cons

des a second

an that prop

d and the so

US‐101 the h

added in the

e would exi

sist of two la

n portal near

than that pro

ion and a slig

sists of a bore

tunnel for a p

posed for Co

uthern porta

highway tunne

e southbound

t to westbo

nes in each d

r LAX.

oposed for C

ghtly more d

Pa

ed highway t

private shutt

oncept 4, wit

al in the LAX

el would cons

d direction co

und US‐101

direction from

Concept 5, w

direct route t

age 25

tunnel

le/rail

th the

area,

sist of

oming

from

m US‐

with a

to the

SepulvedaEngineeri


Figure

or Systems Plport

e 8. Con

anning Study

ncept 6 Toll T

y

Tunnel and Prrivate Shuttlee/Rail Tunnel

Pa

age 26

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.6.1

2.6.

2.6.

2.6.


Key Engine

.1.1 ConceThe pr

tunnel

LAX. A

Roscoe

101 in

comin

The m

structu

system

.1.2 Geotec

As dis

consid

fields,

corrido

profile

As not

numer

seismi

at port

evalua

during

Other

hazard

and th

In extr

geolog

regard

Memo

.1.3 Constr

In add

applica

portal,

(north

requir

or Systems Plport

eering Eleme


l portal struc

A single tunn

e Boulevard a

terchange, on

g from US‐10

major design c

ure, tunnel p

ms and a main

chnical Assesscussed for

derations suc

favorable g

or levels regi

e for the selec

ted, the alignm

rous potentia

c shaking, liq

tals as well as

ation. Potenti

g the design o

geologic haza

ds, expansive

he private shu

reme cases, s

gic and seism

ding geotechn

orandum (Me

ructability Issuition to the c

able to Conce

, traffic in the

bound 405 o

e the constru

anning Study

ents

ments n elements fo

ctures near R

nel portal can

and Century B

ne for traffic

01 to the west

components

portals, tunne

ntenance and

ssment Concepts 4

h as location

geological fo

me are neces

cted routes.

ments are loc

ally active fau

uefaction and

s liquefaction

al displaceme

of the tunnels

ards previous

and collapsib

uttle tunnel d

pecial design

ic conditions

nical issues ca

tro, June 20,

ues onstructabilit

ept 6. Howev

e northbound

r westbound

uction of cut a

y

or Concept 6

Roscoe Boule

n accommod

Boulevard po

coming to an

t.

associated w

el stations, lig

d yard shop fa

4 and 5, sit

ns and orient

rmations, w

ssary to cons

cated in a seis

lts in the area

d landslides n

n potential of

ents along the

s.

sly noted also

ble soils, and

esigns must c

and structur

that exist in t

an be found in

2012).

ty issues note

ver, under Co

d tunnel need

US 101) whil

and cover tra

6 for the high

evard, US‐101

ate both ent

ortals, but two

nd from I‐405

with the priva

ght rail track,

acility.

te specific g

tation of maj

idely varying

sider when es

smically activ

a and seismic

need to be ev

portal struct

e existing fau

o apply to Con

landslides/ro

consider the g

res may be ne

the corridor.

n the Geotech

ed for Concep

ncept 6, at th

s to separate

e still in the t

nsition box st

hway tunnel

1 and Centur

tering and ex

o portals are

to the north

ate shuttle tu

, necessary a

geological an

jor seismic fa

g ground wa

stablishing a

ve region and

c hazards such

valuated. Seis

ures will requ

ults need to b

ncept 6, such

ock topple. Bo

geohazards d

ecessary to ac

Additional in

hnical Evalua

pts 4 and 5, w

he US 101 hig

e into the two

tunnel. This i

tructures of v

Pa

structure an

ry Boulevard,

xiting traffic a

needed at th

and one for t

unnel is the t

associated fac

nd environm

aults, historic

ater in the

desired align

there are

h as fault rup

smic slope sta

uire further

e evaluated

as oil field re

oth the highw

described abo

ccount for the

nformation

tion

which are also

ghway tunnel

o destinations

s expected to

varying width

age 27

nd the

, near

at the

he US‐

traffic

tunnel

cilities

mental

cal oil

study

nment

ture,

ability

elated

way

ove.

e

o

s

o

s and

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.6.

2.6.

2.6.

2.6.


would

standp

the tu

for thr

box st

analys

expect

.1.4 Rough

See Se

assum

Sepulv

depth

.1.5 CapitaConce

from a

near C

locate

LAX ar

for Co

A low

alignm

assum

magni

$30.8B

.1.6 Vehicle

Vehicl

overal

.1.7 Operat

Opera

mainte

Propos

from t

Study.

Conce

or Systems Plport

create challe

point. At the

nnel would n

rough traffic c

ructure and s

sis is needed t

ted temporar

h-Order-of-Magection 2.1.3 of

ptions used w

veda Pass Cor

discussion.

l Cost Estimatpt 6 consists

approximately

Century Boule

d in either a l

rea, with dest

ncept 5.

range and hig

ment, with the

ed economy

tude capital c

B to $38.7B.

e Cost Estimae cost associa

l per mile cap

tion and Maintting and ma

enance costs

sed Budget f

the demand

Based on th

pt 6 were est

anning Study

enges from a

US 101, at th

eed to be con

continuing in

similar issues

to determine

ry and perma

gnitude Costsf this report f

when develop

rridor System

te of a bored hi

y Roscoe Bou

evard. Conce

large, single‐b

tinations and

gh range estim

e low range co

of scale asso

cost estimate

ate ated with the

pital costs dis

tenance Cost intenance co

s for bus serv

for Fiscal Yea

modeling eff

hese inputs, a

timated $104

y

constructabil

he La Grange A

nfigured to al

the tunnel. T

as stated abo

the specific r

nent right of

s for a brief dis

ping the roug

s Planning St

ghway tunne

ulevard to the

pt 6 also inclu

bore tunnel, o

operating ch

mate were de

ost represent

ciated a tunn

e for Concept

e proposed ra

cussed above

Estimate ost estimates

vice and ligh

ar 2013 and

forts for the

average annu

4M per year.

lity, right of w

Avenue and S

llow ingress a

This will also c

ove would ne

requirements

way impacts

cussion of th

gh‐order‐of‐m

udy Prelimina

el through the

e southern en

udes a private

or a twin bore

aracteristics

eveloped for

ting a 20 perc

nel of this leng

6 was estima

il service for

e.

s were devel

t rail operat

average we

Sepulveda P

al operating

way, and main

Sepulveda Bo

and egress wh

create a need

eed to be add

s for each por

due to tunne

e methodolo

magnitude cos

ary Cost Repo

e Santa Monic

nd of the Stud

e shuttle serv

e tunnel from

as for the “he

the tunnel po

cent reductio

gth. The roug

ated to have a

Concept 6, ar

oped using t

ions as repo

eekday passe

Pass Corridor

costs for the

Pa

ntenance of t

oulevard port

hile also allow

d for a transit

ressed. Furth

rtal and the

el constructio

gy and

sts or the

ort for a more

ca Mountains

dy corridor at

vice that wou

m Sylmar to th

eavy rail” opt

ortions of the

n to reflect a

gh‐order‐of‐

a low range o

re included in

the operating

rted in the M

nger miles r

Systems Pla

rail compone

age 28

traffic

als,

wing

ion

her

on.

e in‐

s

LAX,

ld be

he

tion

e

n

of

n the

g and

Metro

esults

anning

ent of

SepulvedaEngineeri

2.6.2


Issues for As noted fo

that may im

box constru

one tunnel

private shu

analysis is

constructio

traffic impa

Another co

tunnel port

to the foun

As noted fo

concepts th

analyses ne

proposed p

the concept

Lastly, simi

maintenanc

developed

or Systems Plport

Further Inveor Concepts 4

mpact propert

uction until it

diameter, or

uttle tunnel,

needed rega

n staging sch

acts and lane

onstructability

tals and tunne

dations of the

or Concept 3

hat have lim

eed to be per

portal location

t and the acc

lar to Conce

ce and yard

urban area.

anning Study

stigation and4 and 5, const

ty and requir

t reaches the

r somewhat le

the box wou

arding possib

hemes that w

closures.

y issue with

el facilities ne

e existing nei

3 and 4, traff

ited entry a

formed to de

ns to better a

ess and egres

ept 5, the pri

shop facility,

y

d Analysis truction of th

re right of wa

e minimum co

ess, dependin

uld flare to r

le portal con

would minim

concept 6, s

ear existing st

ghboring stru

fic managem

nd exit point

etermine the

assess (tunne

ss locations.

ivate shuttle

which may

he portal loca

y acquisitions

over required

ng on ground

reach the ful

nfigurations i

mize right‐of‐w

similar to Co

tructures, and

uctures.

ment is somew

ts to the roa

traffic deman

el and local s

tunnel wou

be challengi

tion will requ

s. The portal

d for tunnels

d conditions.

ll width of t

in order to e

way requirem

ncept 4 is th

d the need to

what more c

adway facilit

nd and capac

street) operat

ld require th

ng within the

Pa

uire laydown

l would be a f

which is gen

In the case o

he track. Fu

examine favo

ments and re

he constructi

o minimize im

challenging fo

ty. Further t

city required a

tional feasibi

he siting of a

e corridor’s h

age 29

areas

flared

nerally

of the

urther

orable

educe

on of

mpacts

or the

traffic

at the

lity of

a new

highly

SepulvedaEngineeri

3 NEXThis

could

for m

trans

for fr

for t

and s

grad

envir

At‐G

TunnIn ad

a mi


XT STEPS study has ide

d be the iden

merit. Further

sit alternative

reeway altern

ransit service

station spacin

e alternatives

ronmental stu

rade and Aer

Create b

Addition

Search o

Develop

Refine co

Refine e

Refinem

Identify

Perform

Commun

nel Options (Cddition to the

nimum, requ

Refine p

First pha

Mountai

Reconfir

based on

Refine tu

Develop

facilities

Identify

Perform

and fan

Identify

construc

or Systems Plport

entified six re

tification of o

r studies wou

es and would

natives. Based

es could be es

ng on anticipa

s. The next st

udies include

rial Viaduct O

basemap inclu

nal geotechnic

of existing util

preliminary r

ost estimate;

nvironmenta

ent of deman

sources of fu

cost/benefit

nity outreach

Concepts 4, 5 items listed

ire the follow

ortal location

ase of geotech

ins and labora

rm initial asse

n site investig

unnel alignme

concepts for

;

possible loca

conceptual d

plant building

standard des

ction, and ope

anning Study

presentative

other feasible

ld also establ

establish lan

d on the conc

stablished tha

ated operatin

teps expected

e, but are not

ptions (Conce

uding titles se

cal desk study

lities records

ramp configu

l analysis of p

nd modeling a

nding and pr

analysis base

h.

and 6) above for Co

wing analyses

ns;

hnical site inv

atory testing;

essment of lar

gation results

ent, profile, a

r tunnel venti

tions for fan

design and pr

gs.

sign compone

erating cost.

y

concepts. A

e alternatives

lish alignmen

e configurati

ceptual engin

at would take

ng speeds, as

d to be requir

limited to, th

epts 1, 2 and

earch for prop

y;

and buildings

urations;

potential imp

and financial

opose likely p

ed on above;

ncepts 1 thro

and evaluatio

vestigation, in

;

rge diameter

;

and configura

lation, fire lif

plant building

roduce conce

ents that can

potential out

, which shoul

nts and station

ons, ramp, an

neering plans,

e into account

well as grade

red as part su

hose listed be

3)

per right of w

s records;

acts and miti

analysis;

project delive

ough 3, conce

ons:

ncluding deep

TBM feasibil

tion;

fe/safety and

gs;

ptual drawing

be utilized as

tcome of sub

ld also be tho

n locations fo

nd direct con

, conceptual o

t the effects o

e‐crossing de

ubsequent pla

elow.

way requireme

gation;

ery method;

epts with tunn

p borings in th

ity with TBM

other tunnel

gs for underg

s “typicals” to

Pa

sequent stud

oroughly anal

or the differen

nector locatio

operating pla

of grades, cur

lay for any at

anning or

ents assessm

nel sections w

he Santa Mon

manufacture

systems and

ground struct

o reduce desig

age 30

dies

yzed

nt

ons

ans

rves,

t‐

ent;

will, at

nica

ers,

d

ures

gn,

SepulvedaEngineeri

Append


dix 1: Conc

or Systems Plport

ceptual Dra

anning Study

awings

y

Documents

4.0 - ENGINEERING ISSUES REPORTmedia.metro.net/projects_studies/sfv-405/images/final...annual opera epulveda Bo develop the ound and sou from Ventura n fications, and ulevard stimate