Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
4 Maslin Crescent, Quakers Hill (NSW)
Traffic & Car Parking Impact Assessment
Client: Pyramids Builders
Prepared by
Evan Boloutis
Director
EB Traffic Solutions Pty Ltd B.Eng (Civil), MEng Sc (Traffic), MBA
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.ebtraffic.com.au
Mobile: 0408 395 729
14 April 2021
Rev C
1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose of this report
This report sets out an assessment of the traffic and parking implications of the current
out of school hours care operation, with specific consideration of the following:
• the existing conditions and a description of the proposal;
• an assessment of the development's car parking requirements;
• adequacy of the on-site and on-street car parking supply to accommodate
both the proposal’s car parking requirements and the car parking demands
anticipated to be generated by the proposal;
• the development’s bicycle parking requirements and
• the traffic impact of the proposal.
1.2 Referenced documents
This report has been based upon a number of sources and references. These include:
• Discussions with the applicant and town planning officers at the City of
Blacktown;
• Nearmap, Google maps, Melways online and Blacktown City Council
Interactive map and www.transportnsw.info;
• Web sites www.bicycleinfo.nsw.gov.au/, www.securabike.com.au/ & Bicycle
Victoria’s, ‘The Bicycle Parking handbook’;
• AutoTURN computer software for the swept path analysis;
• Australian Standards AS 2890.1 (2004), AS 2890.3 (2015) and AS 2890.6 (2009);
• Blacktown’s DCP (2015) and Blacktown Local Environmental Plan (2015);
• Parking surveys undertaken on Thursday 11 February 2021 between 7.30 am
and 6.30 pm; and
• Layout plans of the proposed development at 4 Maslin Crescent Quakers Hill,
Dwg A-DA 002, Issue B, dated 7 April 2021.
2. EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1 Location and Land use
The subject site is located on the south side of Maslin Crescent approximately 20 m
east of Hambledon Road. The location of the subject site is shown in Figure 2.1.
2
Source: Copyright Melways Publishing Pty, Ltd. Reproduced from Melway online with permission
Figure 2.1: Location of the subject site
The Jellyfish child care centre, which caters for up to 40 children, is operated by the
applicant and is located opposite the subject site. The Mihkelson Reserve is located
to the immediate east of the site. The surrounding area is typically residential in nature.
The nature of the site and immediately surrounding area is shown in Figure 2.2.
Source: google maps
Figure 2.2: Nature of the subject site and surrounding area
Subject site
Subject site
Jellyfish child care
3
2.2 Road Network
Maslin Crescent is a Council owned road with an undivided cross section containing
a shared traffic and parking lane in each direction. Unrestricted parking applies along
the roadway.
Photos showing the cross section of Maslin Crescent looking to the east and west are
shown in Figure 2.3 and 2.4, respectively.
Source: google maps street view
Figure 2.3: Maslin Crescent looking east
Source: google maps street view
Figure 2.4: Maslin Crescent looking west
2.3 Existing Parking Supply and Demand
There are around 28 on-street spaces located within 60 m of the site. The area
adopted for the parking surveys is shown in Figure 2.5.
4
Source: google maps Figure 2.5: Survey area adopted for parking surveys
To establish the existing parking demands in the nearby on-street car parking areas,
surveys were undertaken on Thursday 11 February 2021 between 7.30 am and 6.30
pm.
The results of the surveys, which are summarised in Attachment A, indicate that the
peak car parking demands occurred at 9 am and 3 pm and corresponded to two
cars or 7 % of the available on-site parking supply (28 spaces).
2.4 Public Transport
The site has good access to conveniently located public transport services.
These services comprise of the Quakers Hill railway station and a bus route operating
in relative close proximity to the site. Details of the public transport services are
summarised as:
• Quakers Hill railway station is located around 1.2 km to the south-west of the
site; and
• Bus route 732 operates between Rouse Hill and Blacktown via The Ponds.
The bus stops located in close proximity to the site are shown in Figure 2.6.
Survey area
Subject Site
5
Source: google maps
Figure 2.6: Location of bus stops in close proximity to the site
Further, the specific route is shown in Figure 2.7.
Source: google maps
Figure 2.7: Bus route 732
Bus stops
Bus route
Bus stop
Subject site
Subject site
6
3. THE PROPOSAL
It is proposed to refurbish the existing dwelling to provide a child care centre for 29
children.
It is understood from discussions with the applicant that the before and after school
care service operates between 7 am and 9 am and between 3 pm and 6 pm on
weekdays. The child care centre is not proposed to operate on weekends. A total of
four support staff will be provided for the child care centre.
It is proposed to provide a total of eight car parking spaces, inclusive of a disabled
parking space, of which three spaces will be allocated to staff and five spaces
allocated to visitors, inclusive of an accessible space. In addition, two bicycle spaces
are proposed to be provided to encourage staff to cycle to the development.
The layout of the proposed access and car parking areas are shown in Attachment A.
4. CAR PARKING CONSIDERATIONS
4.1 Car Parking Requirements
The car parking requirements for the proposed land use components are set out in
Blacktown’s DCP (2015), specifically Part A, Section 6.3 (Table 1).
Reference to Blacktown’s DCP (2015) indicates that the car parking requirements for
the proposed child care centre are summarised as:
• 1 space per employee, plus
• 1 space per 6 children or part thereof for parents and visitors.
Further, reference to the Building Code of Australia indicates that, for a child care
centre there is a requirement to provide one disabled parking space, which is satisfied
by the proposed provision of a disabled bay.
Application of the above parking rates results in a car parking requirement of nine
spaces inclusive of one disabled space.
Based upon the on-site parking provision of eight spaces and development’s car
parking requirement for nine spaces, the proposed development has a car parking
deficiency of one space.
Reference to the results of the parking surveys (Section 2.,3) indicates that there are
ample available on-street spaces to accommodate the development’s car parking
deficiency of one space.
4.2 Bicycle Parking Requirements
There are no specific bicycle parking requirements for the child care centre as set out
in Blacktown’s DCP (2015), specifically Part A, Section 6.3 (Table 1).
7
Notwithstanding the above, to encourage staff and visitors to the child care centre
to arrive by sustainable means, it is recommended that two bicycle spaces be
located in the front of the site.
4.3 Motorcycle Parking Requirements
There are no motorcycle parking requirements for the child care centre as set out in
Blacktown’s DCP (2015), specifically Part A, Section 6.3.
4.4 Car Park Layout
4.4.1 Dimensions of car accommodation
The visitor parking bays in the car park have been provided at a width of 2.6 m and a
length of 5.4 m with an adjacent aisle width of at least 5.8 m. The staff parking bays
have been provided at a width of 2.6 m and a length of 5.4 m.
Further, wheels stops are proposed to be provided in the easternmost visitor spaces
and the westernmost staff spaces to regulate parking activity within these spaces.
The accessible bay has been provided at a width of 2.4 m with the adjacent
shared/manoeuvring space provided at a width of 2.4 m with a length of 5.4 m and
an aisle width in excess of 5.8 m and a bollard is located centrally within the shared
space at an offset a distance of 800 mm from the edge of the accessway, which
accords with the Australian Standards, AS 2890.6:2009.
Offset clearances of 300 mm have been provided adjacent to any bays located next
to end walls as required by AS 29890.1:2004. In addition, while a blind aisle extension
of 1 m has been provided at the southern end of the accessway in accordance with
AS 2890.1:2004, the swept path assessment indicates that motorists can safely
enter/exit the end bays.
It is recommended that the staff spaces are linemarked yellow with appropriate
signage stating ‘reserved – child care staff parking only’, visitor parking bays are
recommended to be signposted and linemarked appropriately.
4.4.2 Access to/from car spaces
The swept paths of vehicles entering and exiting the respective car spaces on the
development site have been assessed with the use of the AutoTURN computer
software for a B85 car.
The analysis, which is shown in Attachment B indicates that to enable a motorist to
safely access the on-site spaces, manoeuvre from the spaces to then exit from the
car parking spaces in a forward manner to Maslin Crescent.
4.4.3 Width of internal access
Reference to the layout plans indicate that the width of the access to the car park is
5 m which accords with the requirements stipulated in the Australian Standard, AS
2890.1:2004.
8
4.4.4 Sight lines for exiting motorists
To ensure maximum sight lines are provided for motorists exiting from the
development’s access and to pedestrians walking along the south side of Bungalow
Road, a triangular area measuring 2 m along the property boundary from the edge
of the driveway access (to the south) and 2.5 m along the access from the property
boundary, it is recommended that the sight line triangles to the immediate west and
east of the crossover at the boundary line contain low level ground cover (0.3 m max
height).
The requirement to provide sight line triangles for pedestrian safety is stipulated in
Figure 3.3 of the Australian Standard, AS 2890.1:2004.
Reference to the layout plans indicate that clear sight line triangles have been
provided on either side of the accessway. Further, any obstructions within the sight
line triangles such as vegetation or letter boxes, should have a height less than 900
mm.
5. OTHER
5.1 Commercial vehicles
Discussions with the applicant indicate that deliveries associated with the child care
would typically be undertaken in a small van during the off-peak periods, that is,
between the peak drop off/pick up time periods.
These vehicles can be accommodated within the car park. Deliveries are to be
restricted to the time periods between the drop off/pick up time periods, that is
between 9.30 am and 3 pm on weekdays to minimise any potential conflict with
parents arriving to drop off/pick up children.
5.2 Refuse
The refuse bins are currently stored on the west side of the child care centre. The bins
would be serviced by a private contractor in a 6.4 m Single Rigid Vehicle (SRV). An
example of a 6.4 m refuse truck is shown in Attachment D.
The swept paths of a refuse truck entering and exiting the development site have
been assessed with the use of the AutoTURN computer software for a 6.4 m truck.
The analysis, which is shown in Attachment E indicates that to enable a refuse truck
can safely access the on-site car park, manoeuvre on-site to then exit from the car
park in a forward manner to Maslin Crescent.
To minimise the potential for conflict with parents dropping off/picking up children, it
is recommended that the refuse bins are serviced outside of the child care centre’s
operating times.
9
6. TRAFFIC IMPACT
The anticipated traffic generation for the proposed child care centre can be
determined based upon case study survey data documented in the RTA NSW ‘Guide
to Traffic Engineering Developments’ (October 2002), which states that, for long day
care centres, the traffic generation rates correspond to 0.8 vehicle trips per child
during the morning drop off period, (7 am to 9 am) and a traffic generation rate of
0.7 vehicle movements per child during the late afternoon pick up period (4 pm to 6
pm).
Application of the traffic generation rates to the proposed development indicates
that, during the am peak hour, there will be around 24 vehicle movements (12
entry/12 exit movements) and during the pm peak hour, there will be around 20
vehicle movements (10 entry/10 exit movements).
The level of traffic generated by the child care centre could be adequately
accommodated along Maslin Crescent without representing an adverse impact
upon the amenity of the area.
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Having regard to the above, it is concluded that:
• The proposed the development has a car parking deficiency of one space;
• The results of the parking surveys (Section 2.,3) indicates that there are ample
available on-street spaces to accommodate the development’s car parking
deficiency of one space; and
• Traffic generated by the parents and staff will be minimal and is not expected
to adversely impact upon the safety or operation of the surrounding road
network.
Further, it is recommended that:
• the staff spaces are linemarked yellow with appropriate signage stating
‘reserved – child care staff parking only’, visitor parking bays be signposted and
linemarked appropriately;
• the refuse bins are serviced outside of the child care centre’s operating times;
• deliveries are to be restricted to the time periods between the drop off/pick up
time periods, that is, between 9.30 am and 3 pm on weekdays; and
• any obstructions within the sight line triangles such as vegetation or letter boxes,
should have a height less than 900 mm.
10
Evan Boloutis
Director
EB Traffic Solutions Pty Ltd
B.Eng (Civil), MEng Sc (Traffic), MBA
Copyright
The information contained in this report is confidential and intended for the use of the client specified on the front of
the report. No representation is made or is implied to be made to any third party. No part of this report may be
reproduced or used without the written permission of EB Traffic Solutions Pty Ltd. Any unauthorised use of this report will
constitute an infringement of copyright.
Disclaimer
EB Traffic Solutions Pty Ltd takes no responsibility in any way to any person or organisation, other than that for which
the report has been prepared, in respect of the information contained in this report, including any omissions or errors.
11
ATTACHMENT A
RESULTS OF CAR PARKING SURVEYS
ATTACHMENT B
PROPOSED CAR PARK LAYOUT
ATTACHMENT C
SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS (B85 CARS)
3
ATTACHMENT D
6.35 M LONG TRUCK WASTE WISE MINI REFUSE TRUCK
4
ATTACHMENT E
SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS (6.4 m SRV REFUSE VEHICLE)