Upload
ali-akbar-rahmani
View
212
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
membahas mengenai tipe tipe penelitian
Citation preview
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 2
1. Explain the components of the research
proposal
2. Describe the type of research
3. Discuss the differences between quantitative and qualitative research
4. Characterize basic qualitative methods
Learning Objectives
At the end of today’s session, the student should be able to :
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 3
RESEARCH PROPOSALRESEARCH PROPOSAL
I. Title
II. Introduction
III. Literature Review IV. Methodology V. Bibliography VI. Appendix
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 4
1. Title
1. Reflects contents of the research
2. Simple sentence
3. Avoid abbreviation
4. Avoid interrogative sentence
5. Location and time of study
6. etc.
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 5
2. Introduction
1. Background of Problem
2. Problem Statement
3. Hypothesis
4. Objective
5. Significance of the study
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 6
Problem ?Research Problem ?
Problem Selection Criteria : Feasible Interesting Novel Ethical Relevant
2.1 Background of the Problem
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 7
Sources of Research Problems :
a. Literatureb. Scientific meetingsc. Personal experiencesd. Opinion of expertse. Non-scientific sources
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 8
Criteria :
a. Interrogative sentence(s)
b. Be specific and not ambiguous
c. Separate statement for more than one research questions
2.2 Problem Statement
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 9
is simply a statement of predicted relationships between the variables being studied
2.3 Hypothesis
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 10
Condition X is related to Condition Y the occurrence of
Antecedent condition Effect
Independent Dependent variable variable
3 Hypothesis
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 11
Functions
Classification
Stating the Hypothesis
Always necessary ?
2.3. Hypothesis
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 12
Functions
serves to narrow down the field of the research study
forces the researcher to be precise in stating the specific situation being studied
2.3 Hypothesis
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 13
Functions
guides the methodology for the remainder of the study
serves as a framework for stating conclusions of the study as direct answer to the purpose of the study
2.3 Hypothesis
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 14
Functions
will be testable
the researcher will be able to collect data that can then be analyzed statistically to determine if the hypothesis can be supported
A hypothesis is not proved; it is either supported or not supported (rejected)
2.3 Hypothesis
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 15
Criteria :
1. Stated in affirmative sentence, simple and clear2. Has strong theoretical background3. Stated the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variable(s)4. Empirically can be tested5. The statement should be specific6. Should be stated before the study (a priori )
2.3 Hypothesis
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 16
Stating the Hypothesis (Examples)
Educational levels of the mothers have some influences on the growth and development of their children
Taking X medicine may cause disorder of the reproductive function
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 17
Stating the Hypothesis Example
Birth weights of the neonates born by the mothers of smoking husbands are lower than those who were born by the mothers of non-smoker husbands
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 18
Stating the Hypothesis (Example)
The children who do not communicate with adult persons will suffer from severe mental retardation
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 20
2.4 Statement of the Purpose of the Study
the single statement that identifies the focus of the research
what the researcher intends to do to answer the research question
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 21
3 ways : (1) as a declarative statement
(2) as a question
(3) as a hypothesis
2.4 Statement of the Purpose of the Study
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 22
(1) as a declarative statement
The purpose of this study is to describe the effectof structured individualized versus structured group instruction on successful breast feedingby primiparas in their home setting
2.4 Statement of the Purpose of the Study
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 23
2.4 Statement of the Purpose of the Study
(2)as a question
The purpose of this study is to answer the question : Is there a significant relationship between a method of teaching about breast feeding and successful breast feeding by primiparas in their home setting ?
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 24
(3) as a hypothesis
The purpose of this study is to test the following hypothesis:
Primiparas who receive individualized instruction in breast feeding will have a significantly more successful breast-feeding experience in their home setting than primiparas who receive structured group instruction in breast feeding
2.4 Statement of the Purpose of the Study
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 26
From this study those factors which are responsible for stopping breast-feeding in urban communities can be identified and this will be useful for giving feedback for promoting the breast-feeding program.
2.4 Objective
General Objective
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 28
2.5 Significance of the Study
Science
Health Service / Health Policy
Research
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 29
3. Review of Related Literature
Reasons to Review the Literature
To determine what has already been done Provides ideas about the kinds of studies that need to be done To point out research strategies
To help the researcher to interpret the results of the study
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 31
The use of one theory or interrelated theories to support the rationale (reason) for conducting the study and provide a guide to analyzing the results
Theoretical Framework
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 32
The use of one or more related concepts that underlie the study problem and support the rationale (reason) for conducting the studyThe concepts should also be discussed in relationship to the variables being investigated
(Use diagram)
Conceptual Framework
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 34
4. Methodology
1. Study Design
2. Location and Time
3. Study Population
4. Sampling
5. Sample size
6. Inclusion and exclusion criteria
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 35
7. Informed consent
8. Procedures
9. Identifying Variables
10. Operational definition
11. Plan of data analysis and data interpretation
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 37
Curriculum vitae of researchers Budget Time schedule of the study Informed consent (Form) Statistical formulas Instruments of the study (e.g. Questionnaire) Dummy Table Others
APPENDIXES
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 39
Quantitative and Quantitative and Qualitative ResearchQualitative Research
1. Introduction to Quantitative and Qualitative Research
2. Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research
3. Types of Quantitative and Qualitative Research
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 40
1. Introduction
Many researchers have narrowly defined scientific research method to include only quantitative research.
This research method is based on the philosophy of logical empiricism
Quantitative and Quantitative and Qualitative ResearchQualitative Research
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 41
Quantitative research is
a formal, objective, systematic process in
which numerical data are utilized to obtain
information about the world
Quantitative research ?
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 42
Is used to
- describe variables
- examine relationships among variables
- determine cause- and-effect interactions between variables
Quantitative research
the predominantly used method of scientific
investigation
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 43
Qualitative research is
a systematic, subjective approach used to
describe life experiences and give them
meaning
not a new idea in social and behavioral
sciences
Qualitative research ?
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 44
Quantitative Research
Hard science
Focus : concise and
narrow
Reductionistic
Objective
Qualitative
Research
Soft science Focus : complex
and
broad
Holistic
Subjective
2. Comparison of Quantitative and
Qualitative Research
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 45
Quantitative Research
Reasoning : logistic and deductive
Basis of knowing : cause-and-effect relations.
Tests theory
Qualitative Research
Reasoning : dialectic,
inductive
Basis of knowing : meaning, discovery
Develops theory
2. Comparison of Quantitative and
Qualitative Research
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 46
Quantitative Research
Control
Instruments
Basic elements of
analysis
: numbers
Qualitative Research
Shared interpretation
Communication and observation
Basic elements of analysis : words
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 47
Quantitative Research
Statistical analysis
Generalization
Qualitative Research
Individual interpretation
Uniqueness
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 48
3. Types of Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Types of Quantitative Research
1. Descriptive
2. Correlational
3. Quasi-Experiment
4. Experiment
1. Non-intervention (Observational) 2. Intervention
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 49
Types of Qualitative Research
1. Phenomenology
2. Grounded Theory
3. Ethnography
4. etc.
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 50
1. Phenomenological Research
Phenomenological research is an inductive, descriptive approach developed from phenomenological philosophy
The focus of phenomenological philosophy is understanding the response of whole human being, not just specific parts of behaviors
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 51
The aim of phenomenological research is to describe an experience as it is lived by the person, such as describing a person’s experience of pain as it is lived by that person
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 52
2. Grounded Theory Research
GTR is an inductive research technique. This research approach is useful in discovering what problems exist in a social scene and the process persons use to handle them
GTR emphasizes observation and the development of practice-based intuitive relationships between variables
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 53
The research process involves formulation, testing, and redevelopment of propositions until a theory evolves.
The theory developed is “grounded” or has its roots in the data from which it was derived
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 54
3. Ethnographic Research
ER for investigating cultures through an in-depth study of the members of the culture.
ER attempts to tell the story of people’s daily lives while describing the culture they are a part of
ER process is the systematic collection, description, and analysis of data to develop a theory of cultural behavior
20/04/09 Proposal Penelitian (MHS) 55
Using ER different cultures are described, compared and contrasted to add to the understanding of the impact of culture on human behavior and health