Upload
wiley
View
54
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
3.7.Two Theorems: the “Equipartition” & the “Virial”. Let. . . Equipartition Theorem. generalized coord. & momenta. Quadratic Hamiltonian :. . . . Fails if DoF frozen due to quantum effects. Equipartition Theorem f = # of quadratic terms in H. Virial Theorem. Virial =. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
3.7. Two Theorems: the “Equipartition” & the “Virial”
Let
; 1, ,6 , ; 1, ,3 ,j i ix j N q p i N q p
6 3 3N N Nd d x d q d p 1 Hi i
j j
H Hx d e xx Z x
HZ d e
max
min
1 j
j
xH H ii jj x
j
xd e x d x eZ x
1 H
ij
ed xZ x
iji jj
dd d xd x
1 H
j i jjd d x eZ
k kx extreme xH
1 Hi j d e
Z
i i j
j
Hx kTx
i i jj
Hx kTx
i i ii
Hq q p kTq
i i ii
Hp p q kTp
3i i ii ii
Hq q p NkTq
3i i ii ii
Hp p q NkTp
Equipartition Theorem
Quadratic Hamiltonian :
3
1
3N
i i ii ii
Hq q p NkTq
3
1
3N
i i ii ii
Hp p q NkTp
2 2
1 1
QP nn
i i j ji j
H A P B Q
generalized coord. & momenta
2 j jj
H A PP
2 j j
j
H B QQ
1 1
2QP nn
i ji ji j
H HP Q HP Q
12
H f kT Equipartition Theoremf = # of quadratic terms in H.
Fails if DoF frozen due to quantum effects
12 P QH n n kT
Virial Theorem
i ii
r fVVirial = 3N kT Virial theoremj jj
q p
Ideal gas: f comes from collision at walls ( surface S ) :
SP d r SVP S P f n S
Gaussian theorem : P dV rV 3 P V PV N kT
Equipartition theorem : 1 32
U K N kT 2KV
d-D gas with 2-body interaction potential u(r) :
i ji j i j
ud PV rr
V d N kT 11 i ji j i j
P urN kT d N kT r
Virial equation of stateProb.3.14
3.8. A System of Harmonic OscillatorsSee § 7.3-4 for applications to photons & phonons.
2 2 21 1,2 2i i i iH q p p m q
m
System of N identical oscillators :
1, ,i N
2 2 21
1 1 1exp2 2
Q dq dp p m qh m
2
1 2 2mh m
11Q
kT
1
N
NQ Q Oscillators are distinguishable :N
kT
N
NkTZ Q
ln lnA kT Z N kT
kT
,
lnT V
A kTN kT
,
0T N
APV
U A T S N kT
,
lnN V
AS N k N kT kT
ln 1kTN k
,V
N V
UC N kT
H U PV N kT ,
PN P
HC N kT
Equipartition :122
U N kT N kT
N
NkTZ Q
1
2i E
ig E d e Z
i
'
'
1 12
Ei
N Ni
eg E di
0
1
0
Res 01 1 !
0 0
E N
NN
e E EN
E
contour closes on the left
contour closes on the right
1
ln ln1 !
N
NES k g E k
N
ln ln
N
NEk N N N
ln 1ES N kN
,
1
N V
S N kT E E
ln 1kTS N k
as before
Quantum Oscillators
12n n
0,1,2,n
10
1exp2n
Q n
12 1
1e
e
112sinh2
12
11
NN
NeZ Q
e
12sinh2
N
lnA kT Z1ln 2sinh2
N kT 1 ln 1
2N N kT e
,T V
A AN N
,
0T N
APV
12 1
NU A T S Ne
,
ln 11N V
A eS N k e NT T e
2
2, 1
VN V
N k eUCT e
H U PV U
,P
N P
HCT
Equipartition :122
U N kT N kT
1 ln 12
A N N kT e 1ln 2sinh2
N kT
1 ln 12
kT e
ln 11
N k ee
1 1 1ln 2sinh coth2 2 2
N k NT
1 1coth2 2
N
221 1csch
2 2N k
fails
/
/
1 12 1
11
kT
kT
Schrodingere
Plancke
kT Classical
quantum classicalC C
Mathematica
g ( E )
12
11
NN
NeZ Q
e
12
0
1 !1 ! !
N R
R
N Re e
N R
0
1 1exp2R
N RZ N R
R
0
Ed E g E e
0
1 12R
N Rg E E N R
R
Microcanonical Version
Consider a set of N oscillators, each with eigenenergies12n n
0,1,2,n
Find the number of distinct ways to distribute an energy E among them.
Each oscillator must have at least the zero-point energy disposable energy is
12
E E N R R Positive integers
= # of distinct ways to put R indistinguishable quanta (objects)
into N distinguishable oscillators (boxes).
= # of distinct ways to insert N1 partitions into a line of R object.
1 !1 ! !
N RN R
1 !1 ! !
N RN R
N = 3, R = 5
# of distinct ways to put R indistinguishable quanta
(objects) into N distinguishable oscillators (boxes).
Number of Ways to Put R Quanta into N States
Mathematica
S
1 !1 ! !
N RN R
lnSk
ln ln lnN R N R N R N N N R R R
ln ln lnN R N R N N R R
1
N
ST E
1
N
SR
12
E R N
ln 1 ln 1k N R R
1 lnk N RT R
12ln 12
E Nk
E N
/
1212
kTE N
eE N
/
/
1 12 1
kT
k T
E eN e
12
EN R N
12
ER N
/
1 12 1kTe
same as before
Classical Limit
Classical limit :EN
12
R N
N
R N
1 !1 ! !
N RN R
1 2 1
1 !N R N R R
N
1
1 !
NRN
ln ln lnS k k N R N N N
!
NRN
ln 1Rk NN
ln 1ES k NN
E R
1
N
ST E
k NE
E N kT 122
N kT
equipartition
3.9. The Statistics of Paramagnetism
System : N localized, non-interacting, magnetic dipoles in external field H.
1
N
ii
E E
1
N
ii
μ H1
cosN
ii
H
cos1
HQ e
1
N
NZ Q Q Dipoles distinguishable
coszM N ˆHH z
cos
cos
cos H
H
eN
e
zT
GMH
ln
T
ZkTH
1ln
T
QN kT
H
, lnG T H k T Z
( E = 0 set at H = 0 )
(Zrot cancels out )
Classical Case (Langevin)
Dipoles free to rotate.
2 1 cos
1 0 1cos HQ d d e
2 H He eH
4 sinh HH
14ln ln sinhG N kT Q N kT H
H
zz
MN
1ln
T
QkT
H
cosh 1sinh
HkT
H H
1cothz HH
HLkT
1cothL x xx
Langevin function
Mathematica
( Q , G even in H )
( c.f. Prob 2.2 )
z L x
zM N L xV V
Magnetization =
HxkT
1cothL x xx
Strong H, or Low T : 1x 211 xL x O ex
zM NV V
z
Weak H, or High T : 1x 3
5
3 45x xL x O x
3zHkT
2
3zM N H
V V kT
00
lim zT H
H
MV H
Isothermal susceptibility :( paramagnetic )
2
3NV kT
C
T Curie’s law
C = Curie’s const
CuSO4 K2SO46H2O
Quantum Case
μ J
= gyromagetic ratio2
egmc
= Lande’s g factor
2 1J J J J = half integers, or integers
1 132 2 1
S S L Lg
J J
g = 2 for e ( L= 0, S = ½ )
2 2 2 2J 2 2 1Bg J J
2Bemc
= (signed) Bohr magneton
z m Bg m , 1, , 1,m J J J J
ˆHH z z BH g m H
L S Bg g g μ L S J
Bg m H
1B
Jm g H
m J
Q e
/J
m x J
m J
e
Bx g J H
2 1 /
/
11
J x Jx
x J
eee
2/
0
Jx m x J
m
e e
2 1 / 2 2 1 / 2
2 1 / 2 2 1 / 2
J x J J x Jx
J x J J x J
e eee e
2 1 / 2 2 1 / 2
/ 2 / 2
J x J J x J
x J x J
e ee e
1sinh 12
sinh2
xJ
xJ
1ln sinh 1 lnsinh2 2
xG N kT xJ J
( Q , G even in e & H )
1lnsinh 1 lnsinh2 2
xG N kT xJ J
zT
GMH
1 1 11 coth 1 coth2 2 2 2B
xN g J xJ J J J
BxkT g J
H
zz B J
M g J B xN
1 1 11 coth 1 coth2 2 2 2J
xB x xJ J J J
= Brillouin function
Bx g J H
Mathematica
( M is even in e & // H )
Limiting Cases
1 1 11 coth 1 coth2 2 2 2J
xB x xJ J J J
2 2
1
1 1 1 1 11 1 03 2 2 3
J
x
B xx x x
J J J
cothy y
y y
e eye e
21 21 0
3
ye yy y
y
2
2
11
y
y
ee
z B Jg J B x
2
21 1 03 3
BB
B BB
Hg J g JkT
H H HJ J g g JkT kT kT
Curie’s const =
2
3JNCV k
Bx g J H
2 2 2 1Bg J J
Dependence on J
J ( with g 0 so that is finite ) :
Bx g J H
2 2 2 1Bg J J
x , 1JB x L x J ~ classical case
J = 1/2 ( “most” quantum case ) :
g = 2
1/2 2coth 2 cothB x x x
1 1 11 coth 1 coth2 2 2 2J
xB x xJ J J J
2coth 1 cothcoth
x xx
tanh x
z B Jg J B x tanhB x0
BB
B BB
HkT
H HkT kT
2
1/2BNC
V k
2
3NV k
1/2J JC
2 23 B
KCr(SO4)2
J = 3/2, g = 2
FeNH4(SO4)2 · 12H2O,J = 5/2, g = 2
Gd2(SO4)3 · 8H2OJ = 7/2, g = 2
3.10. Thermodynamics of Magnetic Systems: Negative T
J = ½ , g = 2 m Bg m H 12
m
N
NZ Q e e 2cosh N
ln lnG kT Z N kT e e ln 2coshN kTkT
,H N
GST
, ,G T H N
dG SdT M d H d N M is extensive; H, intensive.
ln 2cosh tanhN k NkT T kT
,T N
GMH
tanhBNkT
B H
1m
m
Q e e e
tanhU G T S NkT
M H , ,U S H N
22
2,
sechH N
UC NT kT kT
U here is the “enthalpy”.
Note: everything except M is even in H.
2N
Ordered Disordered(Saturation) (Random)
Mathematica
22
2 sechC NkT kT
2
22 / /
4kT kT
NkT e e
2 /
22 / 1
kT
kT
eNkT e
2 energy gap
Peak near / kT ~ 1
( Schottky anomaly )
Absolute T
Two equivalent ways to define the absolute temperature scale :
1.Ideal gas equation.
2.Efficiency of a Carnot cycle.
P V n R T 0 0T P
1 C
H
TeT
0 1T e Violation of the Kelvin & Clausius versions of the 2nd law.
Definition of the temperature of a system : UTS
U is any thermodynamic potential with S as an independent variable.
0T S as U
Dynamically unstable.
Impossible if Er is unbounded above.
T < 0
0E
E
Z e E Z finite T 0 if E is unbounded.
BH
T < 0 possible if E is bounded.
tanhU NkTe.g.,
Usually T > 0 implies U < 0.
But T < 0 is also allowable if U > 0.U = 0 set at H = 0
( U is even in H )
ln 2cosh tanhSN k kT kT kT
2
1cosh1 tanh
xx
2
1cosh
1kT U
N
N
N U N U
12ln tanhN U US
N NN U N U
tanhU NkT
1tanh UkT N
1 1 1tanh ln
2 1xxx
1 ln2
N UN U
Also
2ln ln2
S N U N UN k N N UN U N U
BH
2ln ln
2S N U N U
N k N N UN U N U
1 1ln 2 1 ln 1 ln2 2
U UN N U N UN N
ln ln2 2 2 2
N U N U N U N UN N N N
Mathematica
1 ln2
N UkT N U
Heat Flow
: small to large
Flow of U (as Q) : High to low.
T : 0 0+
tanhU NkT
BH
Mathematica
Experimental Realization
Let t1 = relaxation time of spin-spin interaction.
t2 = relaxation time of spin-lattice interaction.
System is 1st saturated by a strong H ( US = HM < 0 ). H is then reversed.
Lattice sub-system has unbounded E spectrum so its T > 0 always.
For t1 < t < t2 , spin subsystem in equilibrium; M unchanged US = HM > 0 TS < 0.
For t2 < t , spin & lattice are in equilibrium T > 0 & U < 0 for both.
Consider the case t1 << t2 , e.g., LiF with t1 = 105 s, t2 = 5 min.
T 300K
T 350KNMR
T ( + ) K
T < 0 requires E bounded above:
Usually, K makes E unbounded T < 0 unusual
T > 0 requires E bounded below :
Uncertainty principle makes E bounded below T > 0 normally
T >> max
maxkT 1n n
1N
NZ Q Q n
N
n
e 2 211
2
N
n nn
Let g = # of possible orientations (w.r.t. H ) of each spin
___
1
g
n nn n
g
___
2 2112
N
Z g
___2 21ln ln ln 1
2Z N g
2___ ___2 2 2 21 1 1ln
2 2 2N g
2 31 1ln 12 3
x x x x
___2 2 21ln
2N g
___2 2 21ln ln
2Z N g
___________
21 1, ln ln2
NA N Z g N N
2
N N
A AS kT
___________
222
1ln2
Nk g N
___2 2 21ln
2S N k g
___________
221ln2
N g
___________
2U A T S N N
2,N N
U UC N kT
___________
22 0N k
0
0max lnS S N k g
Energy flows from small to large negative T is hotter than T = +
U is larger for smaller