37907419 Lanco Hr Project

8/13/2019 37907419 Lanco Hr Project

1/62

INDUSTRY PROFILE

One cannot simply think of economic development without the

growth of the Cement Industry. Cement one of the basic elements forsetting up storage and health infrastructure plays a crucial role in

economic development of a country.

Having more then a hundred and fifty years of history it had

been used extensively construction of anything from of building to

projects. As such cement consumption may be considered as one of

the yardsticks in scaling economy. It is core sector industry and a rise

in the price of cement is bound to have inflationary effects on other

industries with in the economy.

India is the second largest cement producing country after china.

he industry is characteri!ed by a high degree of fragmentation that

has creator intense competitive pressure on price reali!ations. "pread

across length and breath of the country there are #$% large plants

belonging to &' companies of around #(& )illion ones *) + as )arch

$%%$.

he industry was totally decontrolled in )arch #,-, and deli

censed in uly #,,# leading to a rapid increase in installed capacity

from '#.&& )illion ones per annum in #,-,/,% to #%&.$& )illion ones

per annum in #,,'/,0. oday cement ranks among the to five

industries in terms of their contribution to the union excise duty.

Cement manufacturing involves hating a mixture of limestoneand clay. 1artial fusion occurs and lumps called clinkers are formed.

he clinker is mixed with little amount of gypsum to give Ordinary

1ortland 1ortland2Cement *O1C+3 mixing this with blast furnace slag or

husk yields 1ortland "lag Cement *1"C+ and 1ortland 1o!!olonna

1


2/62

Cement *11C+. he producing capacities of are3 11C and 145"C are 0%3

#- and ## percent respectively. he manufacturing process has also

changed from the inefficient wet process to the more efficient dry

process -06 of the total capacity is of dry process and #(6 is not.

Cement consumption growth is highly correlated to the 781

growth and serves ad a leading Indicator. )ore industrial activities and

greater purchasing power means more asset formation and thus more

consumption of cement.

INSUSTRY STRUCRURE 9 he total world production of cement if to be around #:%% ) .

Asia is the largest consumer followed by ;urope < the America. India=s

installed capacity and production for #,,'/,0 was #%&.$& )illion ones

1er annum


3/62

>ith the expected huge demand in the Asian countries the future

India being a convenient country for the export oriented activities and

with the cheaper labour there are many cement Companies entering

India.

Cement is preferred as building material in India. It is used

extensively in house hold and industrial construction. ;arlier

government sector used to consume &%6 of the cement sold in India3

but in the last decade it share has come down to (&6 rural areas

consume less $(6 of the total cement. Availability of cheaper building

material for the nonpermanent structure affects the rural demand.

he budget gave substantial incentives to private sector

construction companies. Ongoing liberali!ation will lead to an increase

in industrial activities and infrastructure development so it is hoped

that Indian cement industry shall boom again in near future. he

?ational highway Act to allow private toll collection and identified

projects3 bridge3 expressways for private construction.

MARKETING:

Cement being a commodity item has low margins and its bulky

nature ensures that the supply is determined by the economical

transportation distance3 this led to the formation of regional markets3

>estern3 ?orthern3 "outhern and eastern. And the concentration of

limestone deposits in a few states has a led to the concentration of

limestone the formation of cement plant clusters at seven locations.

Having surpassed the period of shortage and achieving high growth

arte in capacity3 implying springing up many plants3 the industry is

getting competitive. Hence the necessary and need for coordinated

marketing efforts.

3


4/62

he surplus cement that emerged towards end of the #,-%=s

necessitated the Indian cement industry to develop marketing

strategies and look for new areas of cement usage. On such are

identified was the coast of concrete roads.

"ince #,-- the cement manufacturers association has

propagated the idea of concrete roads through a series of seminars3

workshops and deliberations at decision/making levels at both state

and central governments discussions with metropolitan authorities and

other involved in road building activities. As a result the 8elhi/)atura

road is under construction. he city of 4ombay has already completed

construction of one/third of its (&% km arterial roads with concrete.

)ore concrete roads and likely to be built in India both in the private

and government sectors including toll roads and express highways.

he government has recently asked for private participation including

foreign investment for the construction of toll roads3 some which are

likely to be concrete.

he incentives offered to private builders include a guarantee ofminimum reasonable rate of return on their investments3 increase debt

e@uity ratio up to #%%6 foreign e@uity participation development of

service and rest areas along the road. ;xpressways between 4ombay/

?asik3 4ombay/1une3 4angalore )ysore and 4ombay/Badodara are

some of the roads identified.

4


5/62

Cement Production in India or t!e Period "##$%&''(

Year Production

)In MT*

Gro+t! in

,roduction#,,&/,' ':.&( '.#-#,,'/,0 ',.,- &.:,,0/,- -#.'& :.,##,,-/,, -&.(& (.0%#,,,/%% --.:$ (.%0$%%%/%# --.:$ (.%0$%%#/%$ -,.:$ #.$%$%%$/%( ,%.0% #.%-$%%(/%: ,#.%$ %.($

Source: "urvey of Indian Industry.

PLANTS UNDER T-E GROUP

he pig iron plant and anco Cement 1lant are two plants3

which are presently under the name of )Ds. anco Industries td.3

and anco constructions imited are the sister of concern of it.

ADMINISTRATION

he general administration of the company is carried out by

the Chairman3 )anaging 8irector3 the Bice/1resident and 7eneral

)anagers of 5inance3 Commercial operations and Administration.

hey were assisted by )anager Immuni!ation and some other

)anagers.

he Chairman and )anaging 8irector are holding overall

control on administration in all aspects3 with the help of Bice/

1resident and other 7eneral )anagers. he board consists of &

members 8irectors3 Bice/Chairman3 a )anaging 8irector and a

Company "ecretary.

5


6/62

COMPANY PROFILE

6

7ate

;ntrance

"ecurity

Administration 4lock

emple

1ower1roduction

1hysical DChemical

ab

Cement1roduction

1ig Iron

P.ant .a/out


7/62

ESTA0LIS-MENT:

anco group is a fast growing and leading Indian industrial group3

which has bla!ed a trial of success in Civil ;ngineering3 1ig Iron3cement3 surface ransport3 "hipping "ervices and other areas of

industrial activity. ".B. Contractors "eaways "hipping "ervices limited.

Ealahasti Castings imited and anco "teels limited. Are all frontline

companies in their respective field of activity.

)D" anco 5erro imited3 producing 1ig Iron3 was established in

the year #,,( on une , th at Fachagunneri *Bill+3 "rikalahasti *mandal+3

Chittoor *district+3 A.1. It was renamed as )Ds anco Industries imited.

On the # "eptember #,,:3 when the )anagement started the

production of cement. he Cement unit with state of the art vertical

shaft kiln well @ualified personnel producing 1ortland "lag Cement. he

annual capacity of the cement plant is ,%.%%% tones.

anco Industries limited is presently at internal assessment

stage of I"O ,%%$ certification for its manufacturing process.

LOCATION OF T-E PLANT:anco Industries limited is located in between irupati and

"rikalahasti with (%km and #%km distance respectively.

ocation of the plant at this place i.e.3 at Fachagunneri Billage of

Chittoor 8istrict3 A.1. having the following advantages. Cheap availability of re@uired land. here are abundant water resources. he distance between the harbor and present work site is

relatively less. 1roximity of raw materials.

Availability of financial subsidy.

7


8/62

?earer to the railway siding. >ell connected with rail and road transport. Availability of labor.

CURRENT OPERATIONS:%

1resently company is manufacturing &( grades3 Ordinary

1ortland 1ortlandCement *O1C+ with brand G A?CO . he different

varieties of cement that are being manufactured at the factory are9

#. Ordinary 1ortland Cement *O1C+

$. 1ortland "lag Cement *1"C+

(. 1ortland 1o!!olonna Cement *11C+

At present company is manufacturing anco Cement &( grade.

At present about -%%% tones of various grades of cement is

having daily manufactured at the factory.

SAILENT FEATURES OF LANCO CEMENT:%

#. High "trength


9/62

irrigation3 pipeline projects highways3 housing and industrial

construction project an successfully compared several housing

complexes roads3 irrigation canals3 bridges and industrial

complexes at anco diverse dimensions of growth is achievedthrough converging rays of vision rays of vision creating

dimensions.

KALA-ASTI CASINGS LIMITED

;stablish in #,,0 and strategically located in alone

proximity to the mini blast furnace of the pig iron plants it has a

clear economics mileage over other castings sites . he moltenmetal from the blast cone is directly loosed as basic raw material

to produce graded castings .Cast iron span pipes and iron spun

gradually expanded further to meet the scaring demand of the

products. he J1" to the pipe plant will be met through #%)>

capture power plant.

LANCO PIG%IRON DI1ISION

It is located at Fachagunneri. he pig iron is commissioned

in a record time of eleven months3 drawing on the groupKs

expertise in Civil ;ngineering and Industrial construction.

Highlights9

"tate of art mini blast furnace

"trategic location with easy accessOne of the few plants with its own railway siding

High @uality is from the neighboring 8onimalai deposits

Access to best grade coke from China

,%3%% tpa capacity

9


10/62

1roximity to end/users

)anufacturing all grades of 1ig iron with the highest rating

@uality

CEMENT DI1ISION

he slag from pig/iron plant is used for producing ,%3%%%

tpa cement3 reflecting an approach that transforms the by/

product into productive inputs3 in value added finish product.

High @uality port land slag cement in various grades of

universal application

uality consistent composition3 competitive pricing

10


11/62

ORGANI2ATIONAL -IERARC-Y LANCO INDUSTRIES

LIMITED

LITERATURE REVIEW

11

)anaging 8irector

Bice 1resident

7eneral )anager

5inance1ig Iron 8ivision

Cement8ivision

1ersonal espondents

.ercentage

1 ormal 4 4&762 +n!ormal 20 23&83 )oth 60 71&8

I%TERPRETATI(% (R %U",ER ( .(LLEA/UE* T)AT T)E+ "(VE

Type of communication amongColleagues

4 20

60

4.76

23.8

71.4

0

20

40

60

80

Formal Informal Both

No. of.Respondents

Percentage of Respondents

24


25/62

Among 84 respondents 24 o! them said that the# mo%e %er# good numbers "ith

peers and 48 said it is good& 12 said that it is a%erage the "eighted a%erage percentage is

!alls in 4&14& 'o through the obser%ation most o! them mo%e "ith good number&

3$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R *)ARI%/ PER*(%AL EELI%/*

he belo" table sho"s that most o! them share their personal !eelings "ith

some extent !e" o! them sa# #es according to this the relationship is good among the

peers

'&Do Attributes Do&o!

>espondents

.ercentage

1 Fes 16 19&042 Do 0 03 'ome @xtent 68 80&45

25


26/62

I%TERPRETATI(% (R *)ARI%/ PER*(%AL EELI%/*

he abo%e graph sho"s that most o! them share their personal !eelings "ith


peers

Sharing personal feelings with colleagues

16 0

68

1 .040

80. !

020

40

60

80

100

"es no somee#tent

no. of.Respondents

percentage of respondents

26


27/62

II$ RELATI(%*)IP WIT) *UPERI(R*

4$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R /ETTI%/ PER"I*I(% R(" *UPERI(R*

he belo" table 8&57G o! them said that the# can permission !rom superiors

easil# and 71&42G said that in some extent onl# "e can get permission easil#&


>espondents

.ercentage

1 Fes 24 28&572 Do 0 03 'ome @xtent 60 71&42

27


28/62

I%TERPRETATI(% (R /ETTI%/ PER"I*I(% R(" *UPERI(R*

he abo%e graph sho"s that 28&57G o! them said that the# can permission !rom

superiors easil# and 71&42G said that in some extent onl# "e can get permission easil#&

Getting permission from superiors

240

6028.!7

0

71.42

010203040!0607080

"es no somee#tent

no. of.Respondents


28


29/62

5$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R E%.(URA/E "E%T R(" *UPERI(R*

he belo" table sho"s that 23&8G o! the respondents said that superiors

encourages them "hen the# are in depression 28&57G o! the respondents said that the#

do not encourage and 47&63G o! them said that in some extent the# encourage


>espondents

.ercentage

1 Fes 20 23&82 Do 24 28&573 'ome @xtent 40 47&63

29


30/62

I%TERPRETATI(% (R E%.(URA/E "E%T R(" *UPERI(R*

he abo%e graph sho"s that 23&8G o! the respondents said that superiors

encourages them "hen the# are in depression 28&57G o! the respondents said that the#

do not encourage and 47&63G o! them said that in some extent the# encourage

Encourages from superiors

20 244023.8

28.!7

47.63

010203040!060

"es no somee#tent

no. of.Respondents


30


31/62


he belo" table sho"s that 19&05G o! them sharing their personal !eelings "ith

supoerionrs 57&14G o! them sa# no and 23&8G o! them said in some extent "e share the

personal !eelings in !ree times &


>espondents

.ercentage

1 Fes 16 19&052 Do 48 57&143 'ome @xtent 20 23&8

31


32/62


he abo%e graph sho"s that 19&05G o! them sharing their personal !eelings

"ith supoerionrs 57&14G o! them sa# no and 23&8G o! them said in some extent "e

share the personal !eelings in !ree times &

16

48

201 .0!

!7.14

23.8

010

20

30

40

!0

60

$es No %ometent

No.of Respondents

Percentage

32


33/62


34/62

Communication with superiors inoutside of the organization

8

44

20.!2

!2.38

23.6

0

20

40

60

$es No %ome tent

%er'es1

%er'es2

I%TERPRETATI(% (R .(""U%I.ATI(% WIT) *UPERI(R* I%

(UT*I&E ( T)E (R/A%I8ATI(%

he abo%e graph sho"s that 9&52G o! them said that there ha%e communication

"ith their superiors 52&38G said that no and 23&8G o! them said that in some extent the#

ha%e out side o! the organi,ation

34


35/62

9$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R TELE.(""U%I.ATI(% WIT) *UPERI(R*

he belo" table sho"s that 57&14G o! them said that the# ha%e phone calls !rom

superiors 9&52G o! them said that the# do not ha%e no phone calls and 33&33G o! them

said that in some extent the# ha%e phone calls !rom superiors&


>espondents

.ercentage

1 Fes 48 57&14

2 Do 8 9&523 'ome @xtent 48 33&33

35


36/62

Telecommunication with superiors

48

8

48!7.14

.!2

33.33

010203040!060

$es No %ome tent

%er'es1

%er'es2

I%TERPRETATI(% (R TELE.(""U%I.ATI(% WIT) *UPERI(R*

he abo%e graph sho"s that 57&14G o! them said that the# ha%e phone calls !rom

superiors 9&52G o! them said that the# do not ha%e no phone calls and 33&33G o! them

said that in some extent the# ha%e phone calls !rom superiors&

36


37/62

0:$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R E;PE.TATI(%* ( *U,AR&I%ATE* (%

*UPERI(R


38/62

Expectation of subordinates onsuperior coordination

24 2644

28.!71 .0!

!2.38

0

20

40

60

$es No %ome tent

%er'es1

%er'es2

I%TERPRETATI(% (R E;PE.TATI(%* ( *U,AR&I%ATE* (%

*UPERI(R


39/62

III$ RELATI(%*)IP WIT) &EPART"E%T*

00$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R RELATI(% *)IP WIT) &EPART"E%T*

he belo" table sho"s that 26&19G o! the respondent said that relation ship

bet"een departments is good and 73&81G o! them said that is a%erage&


>espondents

.ercentage

1 Eer# good 0 02 Bood 22 26&193 A%erage 62 73&814 Co" 0 05& Eer# Co" 0 0

39


40/62

Relationship with departments

0

22

62

0 00

26.1

73.81

0 00

20

40

60

80

(er"good

)ood *+erage ,o- (er",o-

%er'es1%er'es2

I%TERPRETATI(% (R RELATI(% *)IP WIT) &EPART"E%T*

he abo%e graph sho"s that 26&19G o! the respondent said that relation ship

bet"een departments is good and 73&81G o! them said that is a%erage

40


41/62

01$ $I%TERPRETATI(% (R .(""U%I.ATI(% WIT) &EPART"E%T*

he belo" table sho"s that 19&05G o! them said that other departments can share

their !eeling "ith them 57&14G o! them said that no and 23&08G o! them said that in

some extent onl# the# can share their !eelings "ith them


>espondents

.ercentage

1 Fes 16 19&05

2 Do 48 57&143 'ome @xtent 20 23&08

41


42/62

Communication with departments

16

48

201 .0!

!7.14

23.08

010203040

!060

$es No %ometent

No.of RespondentsPercentage

I%TERPRETATI(% (R .(""U%I.ATI(% WIT) &EPART"E%T*

he abo%e graph sho"s that 19&05G o! them said that other departments can

share their !eeling "ith them 57&14G o! them said that no and 23&08G o! them said that

in some extent onl# the# can share their !eelings "ith them

42


43/62

IV REALTI(%*)IP WIT) *U,(R&I%ATE*


he belo" table sho"s that most o! them share their personal !eelings "ith


peers

*$%o Attri utes %o$of$Respondents Percentage1 Eer# good 8 9&522 Bood 40 47&623 A%erage 36 42&864 Co" 0 05 Eer# lo" 0 0

43


44/62

Realtionship with subordinates

8

40

36

0 0

.!2

47.6242.86

0 00

10

20

30

40

!0

60

(er"good

)ood *+erage ,o- (er"lo-

%er'es1

%er'es2


he abo%e graph sho"s that most o! them share their personal !eelings "ith


peers

44


45/62

03$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R .(""U%I.ATI(% AT T)E ( LU%.)

he belo" table sho"s that 9&52Go! them said that there is communication at the

time o! lunch 57&14Go! them said that no and 33&33Go! them said that in some extent

onl# there is communication at the time o! lunch&&

'&Do Attributes Do&o! >espondents .ercentage1 Fes 8 9&522 Do 48 57&143 'ome @xtent 28 33&33

45


46/62

Communication at the time of lunch

8

48

28

.!2

!7.14

33.33

0

10

20

30

40

!0

60

$es No %ome tent

%er'es1

%er'es2

I%TERPRETATI(% (R .(""U%I.ATI(% AT T)E ( LU%.)

he abo%e graph sho"s that 9&52Go! them said that there is communication at

the time o! lunch 57&14Go! them said that no and 33&33Go! them said that in some extent

onl# there is communication at the time o! lunch&&

46


47/62

04$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R PER*(%AL RELATI(%*)IP WIT)

*U,(R&I%ATE*$

he belo" table sho"s that 9&52G o! them said that there is personal relationship

"ith their subordinates 61&9G o! them said that no and 28&5G o! them said that is some

extent onl# the# ha%e personal relationship "ith subordinates&


>espondents

.ercentage

1 Fes 8 9&522 Do 52 61&93 'ome @xtent 24 28&5

47


48/62

Personal relationship with subordinate

8

!2

24

.!2

61.

28.!

0

10

20

30

40

!0

60

70

$es No %ome tent

%er'es1

%er'es2

I%TERPRETATI(% (R PER*(%AL RELATI(%*)IP WIT)

*U,(R&I%ATE*$

he belo" table sho"s that 9&52G o! them said that there is personal relationship

"ith their subordinates 61&9G o! them said that no and 28&5G o! them said that is some

extent onl# the# ha%e personal relationship "ith subordinates&

48


49/62


50/62

co operation with high levelmanagement

8

40 36

0 0

.!2

47.6242.86

0 00

10

20

30

40

!0

60

(er"good


%er'es1

%er'es2

I%TERPRETATI(% (R .(=(PERATI(% R(" )I/) LEVEL "A%A/E"E%T

he belo" table sho"s that 73&81G o! the respondents said that the co operation

!rom high le%el management is good 26&19Go! them said that a%erage co operation !rom

high le%el management&

50


51/62

06$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R .("L"U%I.ATI(% R(" T(P LEVEL T(

,(TT(" LEVEL

he belo" table sho"s that 80&95G o! them said that the communication !rom top

le%el to bottom le%el is good and remaining said that it is a%erage&

*$%o Attri utes %o$of$Respondents Percentage1 Eer# good 0 02 Bood 68 80&95

3 A%erage 16 19&054 Co" 0 05 Eer# lo" 0 0

51


52/62

communiltion fromtop level to bottomlevel

0

68

16

0 00

80.!

1.0!

0 00

10203040!06070800

(er"good


%er'es1%er'es2

I%TERPRETATI(% (R .("L"U%I.ATI(% R(" T(P LEVEL T(

,(TT(" LEVEL

he abo%e graph sho"s that 80&95G o! them said that the communication !rom

top le%el to bottom le%el is good and remaining said that it is a%erage&

52


53/62

07$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R .(""U%I.ATI(% R(" ,(TT(" LEVEL

T( T(P LEVEL

he belo" table sho"s that 71&34G o! them said that the communication !rom

bottom le%el to top le%el is good le%el is good and remaining said that it is a%erage&

*$%o Attri utes %o$of$Respondents Percentage1 Eer# good 0 02 Bood 60 71&433 A%erage 24 28&574 Co" 0 05 Eer# lo" 0 0

53


54/62

personal relationship with superior

16

48

20

0 0

1.0!

!7.14

23.81

0 00

10

20

30

40

!0

60

(er"good


%er'es1

%er'es2

I%TERPRETATI(% (R PER*(%AL RELATI(%*)IP WIT) *UPERI(R*

he abo%e graph sho"s that 19&05G o! them said that the personal relationship

"ith their superiors is %er# good 57&14G o! them said that good and 23&81G o! them

said that the personal relationship "ith superiors is a%erage&

54


55/62

1:$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R .(% LI.T ,ETWEE% *UPERI(R A%&

*U,(R&I%ATE

he belo" table sho"s that 11&91G o! them said that the con!licts are high

59&52G said that a%erage and 28&57G o! them said that con!licts are lo"&

*$%o Attri utes %o$of$Respondents Percentage1 Eer# good 0 02 Bood 10 11&913 A%erage 50 59&524 Co" 24 28&575 Eer# lo" 0 0

55


56/62

conflict between superior subordinate

0

10

!0

24

00

11. 1

!.!2

28.!7

00

10

20

3040!0

60

70

(er"good


%er'es1

%er'es2

I%TERPRETATI(% (R .(% LI.T ,ETWEE% *UPERI(R A%&

*U,(R&I%ATE

he abo%e graph sho"s that 11&91G o! them said that the con!licts are high

59&52G said that a%erage and 28&57G o! them said that con!licts are lo"&

56


57/62

10$ I%TERPRETATI(% (R *UPRERI(R A%& *U,(R&I%ATE

RELATI(%*)IP

he belo" table sho"s that 90&48G o! them said that the relationship bet"een

superior and subordinate is good and remaining said that it is a%erage&

*$%o Attri utes %o$of$Respondents Percentage1 Eer# good 0 02 Bood 76 90&48

3 A%erage 8 9&524 Co" 0 05 Eer# lo" 0 0

57


58/62

superior andsubodinate relationship

0

76

80 00

0.48

.!20 0

010203040!06070800

100

(er"good


%er'es1%er'es2

I%TERPRETATI(% (R *UPRERI(R A%& *U,(R&I%ATE RELATI(%*)IP

he abo%e graph sho"s that 90&48G o! them said that the relationship bet"een

superior and subordinate is good and remaining said that it is a%erage&

58


59/62

I%&I%/*

1& >@CA + D' +. A DB .@@>'

85G o! the emplo#ees said that the# share their !eelings and the# are %er#

cooperati%e and satis!ied&

2& >@CA + D' +. :+ '/.@>+ >'

42G o! the emplo#ees ha%e a good relation ship "ith their superiors&

3& >@CA + D' +. :+ @.A @D '

35G o! the emplo#ees ha%e a good relationship "ith their departments&

4& >@CA + D' +. :+ '/) > +DA @'

35G o! the emplo#ees ha%e a good relationship "ith the their subordinates&

5& 80G o! the emplo#ees said that the cooperation !rom high-le%el management is

good&

6& 70G o! the emplo#ees said that communication !rom top le%el to bottom le%el is

good&

7& 65G o! the emplo#ees said the# con!lict bet"een the superior and a subordinate is

a%erage&

*U//E*TI(%*

or increasing relationship among peers superiors subordinates and

departments conduct some acti%ities li$e

59


60/62

1& pro%ide recreation !acilities

hrough this the communication due to in!ormal relationship "ill de%elop among

the emplo#ees and as "ell as it is %er# much use!ul !or reducing mental tensions

and pro%ide good health&

2& onduct management games&

3& )ecause o! conducting management games the emplo#ees can mingle "ith each

other %er# easil#&

4& .ro%ide common lunchroom

hrough common lunch room the emplo#ees can tal$ "ith each other and the

time "ill be utili,ed in better "a#&

5& onduct > "or$shops&

6& At least !or a couple o! months at once plan !or a tour&

hrough this the relationship bet"een superiors and subordinates "ill de%elop&

7& elebrate the !unctions in the organi,ations !or occasions&

>UE*TI(%%AIRE

*UPERI(R ? *U,(R&I%ATE RELATI(%*)IP I% LA%.E

I$ RELATI(%*)IP A"(%/ PEER*$

1& Four colleagues are co-operati%e in "hat "a#H

a& Eer# good b& Bood & Co" d& Eer# lo"&

2& ail# the communication "ith #our colleagues isH

a& Eer# good b& Bood & Co" d& Eer# lo"&

60


61/62

3& :hich t#pe o! communication did #ou ha%e #our colleaguesH

a& !ormal b& in!ormal c& both

4& o #ou share #our personal !eelings "ith #our colleaguesH

a& #es b& no c& 'ome extent&

II RELATI(%*)IP WIT) *UPERI(R*

5& Are #ou able to permission !rom #our superiors easil# "hen #ou needH

a& #es b&no c& 'ome extent

6& o #ou !eel that #our superiors are encourages #ou "hen #ou are in depressionH

a& #es b& no& c& some extent

7& Are #ou able to share #our personal !eelings "ith #our superiors in !ree timesH

a& #es b&no c& some extent&

8& :hen #ou are outside the organi,ation& he communication that #ou ha%e "ith #our

superiors isH

a& #es b&no c& some extent

9& id #ou ha%e phone calls "ith #our superiorsH


10& According to #our expectations #our supe4riors are mo%e "ith #ouH

aes b& no c& some extent&

III RELATI(%*)IP WIT) &EPART"E%T*

11& +n #our organi,ation the relation the relationship "ith the other department areH


12& he other departments can share their %ie"s "ith #ouI


61


62/62

IV$ RELATI(%*)IP WIT) *U,(R&I%ATE*

13&"hat?s #our opinion that the relationship "ith #our subordinatesH

a& %er# good b& good c& lo" d& %er# lo"

14& id #ou ta$e lunch "ith #our subordinatesH

a& #es b& no c& some extent

15& +s there an# personal relationship "ith #our subordinatesH


,I,LI(/RAP)+

1& r& &)& amoria J .ersonnel anagement J imala#a publishing house

2004&

2& .& 'ubbarao J essentials o! human resource management K industrial relations J

imala#a publishing house 2003&

3& &>& =othari Eis"a .ra$asam J research methodolog# methodsd K techni*ues

J De" elhi 1990&

4& '&.& Bupta J )usiness statistics 'ulthan hand 7 sons ne" elhi 1997&

We sites!

"""&lancoindustries&com

s"""&google&com
http://www.lancoindustries.com/http://www.google.com/http://www.lancoindustries.com/http://www.google.com/

Documents

37907419 Lanco Hr Project