3751b1_07

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    1/19

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    2/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    What is the purpose of this

    presentation? Here are a couple reasons:

    interest in digital imaging!

    some concerns related to radiation

    safety and effectiveness

    potential for exposure increase

    (and/or reduction??)

    Forces a re-visit of some actions

    in the far radiological health past

    imaging system inefficiency

    Review of options (regulatory or

    otherwise) for dealing with actual

    and/or perceived concerns

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    3/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    What kind of equipment?

    Digital radiography (DR)

    not digital fluoroscopy using CCD

    cameras

    not film digitizers

    Three different types of DR

    systems

    flat panel imaging arrays

    computed radiography systems

    CCD based - optically coupled

    systems

    What are the concerns?

    No equivalence to "speed" or self

    limitation as in screen/film systems

    Inefficient" systems possible?

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    4/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    Flat Panel Imaging Arrays

    (indirect conversion)

    Image Formation

    [From: Medical Imaging, 2000]

    [From: Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume I.,

    Chapter 4, J. Beutel et al, eds, SPIE Press 2000]

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    5/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    Flat Panel Imaging Arrays

    (direct conversion)

    Image Formation

    [From: Medical Imaging, 2000]

    [From: Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume I.,

    Chapter 4, J. Beutel et al, eds, SPIE Press 2000]

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    6/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    Number of Pixel Elements (3000 x 2500)

    Pixel Element Size ( 0.14 mm x 0.14 mm )

    Flat Panel Imaging Arrays

    [From: Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume I.,

    Chapter 4, J. Beutel et al, eds, SPIE Press 2000]

    [From: Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume I.,

    Chapter 4, J. Beutel et al, eds, SPIE Press 2000]

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    7/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    Computed Radiography

    Image Formation

    Pixel Elements ( 0.2mm x 0.2 mm )

    Pixel Elements(2160 x 1800)

    [From: Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume I.,

    Chapter 5, M. Yaffee, eds, SPIE Press 2000]

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    8/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    CCD based - lens coupled DR system

    Pixel Element ( 0.14

    mm x 0.14 mm )

    Pixel Elements

    (3000 x 2500)

    CCD based - fiber optic coupled DR system[From: Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume I.,

    Chapter 4, J. Beutel et al, eds, SPIE Press 2000]

    [From: P. Sund et al,Proc. SPIE 3977: 437; 2000]

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    9/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    What are radiation

    protection and safety issues?

    Unique characteristics of

    screen/film imaging systems

    self limitation of patient

    exposure

    concept of "speed" defined and

    understood

    New considerations for digital

    radiography

    no self limitation as in

    screen/film systems

    no consensus on speed

    "inefficient" systems possible?

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    10/19

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    11/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    Film/Screen Speed

    Film/screen speed

    speed = 100/E where E is exposure in

    mR to produce an optical density of

    1.0

    position on exposure axis dependenton speed

    higher speed number translates to

    lower patient exposure

    Difference

    in speed

    of about 2

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    12/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    DR Speed

    DR operating point

    equivalence to film/screen speed set

    at installation?

    no self limitation except at extreme

    ends of the gray-scale transfer curvepatient exposure increase / decrease /

    equivalence compared to film/screen?

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    4000

    4500

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    Relative Exposure

    PixelValue

    Gain 1

    Gain 2

    Gain 3

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    13/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    Imaging System Inefficiency

    Chest radiography - screening program(60s-70s) for cardiopulmonary disease

    need for rapid, economical imaging system

    Photofluorographic (PFG) imaging

    system mobile vans

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    14/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    Public Health Concerns

    Low detection rate for tuberculosis,

    heart disease, and other respiratory

    diseases

    High patient radiation exposure vs

    conventional screen/film radiography

    BRH develops standard technique for

    estimating patient exposure

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    15/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    Digital Radiography

    (CCD based - lens coupled)

    X-rays

    Visible

    light

    Phosphor

    (object)

    Lens

    - Not all but focus on those withlarge object and small image

    - Less than 1 %of light photons

    make it to film!!

    CCD

    Camera

    (image)

    Digital

    Radiography

    System

    Careful system design to overcome

    inefficiencies

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    16/19

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    17/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    Options

    Tracking exposure levels

    NEXT 2001 chest radiography

    diagnostic reference levels (ICRP,

    AAPM, many others)

    practical tools for managing radiation

    dose levels to patients

    Quality assurance programs

    Performance evaluation of

    Computed radiography system,

    Med. Phys. 28(3), March 2001

    Diagnostic x-ray Performance

    Standard

    performance requirements on levels

    of imaging performance such asdetective quantum efficiency (DQE)

    dose display at operators console

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    18/19

    TERPSSC 2001 Robert M. Gagne

    Dose Display

    Previous slide describes several viable

    options TEPRSSC radiation standards and

    safety committee

    Diagnostic x-ray Performance

    Standard

    dose display at operators console for all

    radiographic equipment

    Practical considerations yet to be

    explored or evaluated

    cost

    effectiveness

    alternatives?

    dose descriptor and definition?

    tie to diagnostic reference levels

    effective resource allocation

  • 8/10/2019 3751b1_07

    19/19