362 bar

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 362 bar

    1/7

    Print view

    CDJ 2008 SC 1495

    Court : Supreme Court of India

    Case No :Criminal Appeal No.1389 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (Crl No.!238 of 200"

    Judges: #$% $&N&'A)L% *. +'S#IC% #A'N C$A##%+%% , #$% $&N&'A)L% *.+'S#IC% P. SA#$ASI-A*

    Parties :State ep. ) /.S.P. S.).C.I./. Cennai -ersus .-. aendran , &ters

    Appearing Advocates :4or te Appellant 5 66666 4or te espondents5 66666

    Date o Judg!ent :0260962008

    "ead Note :#

    Criminal Pro7edure Code Se7tion 32 "82 6 :eter te $ig Court in e;er7ise ofits inerent poents ie< of su=se?uent e>ents tat ad ta@en pla7e after te final order disposing of te

    earlier 7riminal petition er applied fortransferring te in>estigation from State Poli7e autorities to te C)I = ma@ing anindependent appli7ation. A77ordingl do not tin@ tat te $ig Court er te in>estigation of te 7ase from te State Poli7e autorities to te C)Iautorities. It is needless to mention tat it

  • 8/13/2019 362 bar

    2/7

  • 8/13/2019 362 bar

    3/7

    College *adras. &n te personal 7omplaint of te /& a 7ase estigation to C)I and also dire7ted tat te ?uestionof granting 7ompensation

  • 8/13/2019 362 bar

    4/7

  • 8/13/2019 362 bar

    5/7

  • 8/13/2019 362 bar

    6/7

  • 8/13/2019 362 bar

    7/7

    te respondents ad ne>er applied for transferring te in>estigation from State Poli7eautorities to te C)I = ma@ing an independent appli7ation. A77ordingl estigation of te 7asefrom te State Poli7e autorities to te C)I autorities. It is needless to mention tat itestigation from State Poli7eautorities to C)I after =ringing 7ertain su=se?uent e>ents tat ad ta@en pla7e afterte disposal of te original 7riminal petition if tere =e an it