Upload
dylon-wakefield
View
212
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
35Measuring Agency-Level Results Part II: Mission Metrics
April 10, 2013
Presented by Barbara WillettDirector of Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning
Mercy Corps
What is Mission Metrics
An agency initiative to
understand how we – collectively –
are achieving our mission.Mission StatementMercy Corps exists to alleviate suffering,
poverty and oppression by helping people build secure, productive and just
communities.
3
Mission Indicators: How They Work
• Program indicators are aligned with Mission Indicators
• Results are reported• Data is reviewed for quality and
methodology• Results aggregated, analyzed,
discussed, presented• Recommendations for action• Monitoring of actions and
learnings
Program Indicators
Mission Indicator
AGENCY RESULTS
35
Mission Metrics Learning Cycle
Reflect/ DiscussAnalyze
Revi
ew
Resu
lts/L
earn
Make
Decisions
Take Action
Incoming Data
Cycle of Learning
10.2-Accountable Governance
10.1-Communities Engaged in Governance9.3-Improved Relationships
9.2-Mechanisms to Manage Conflict9.1-Improved Peace/Security
8.1-Sectors Interacting7.2-Participation of Marginalized
7.1-Improved Capacity - Marginalized6.2-Jobs Created
6.1-Improved Markets
5.2-Partner Capacity5.1-Community Action
4.1-Household Prosperity3.2-Improved Health
3.1-Access to Health2.2-Reduced Vulnerability
2.1-Mechanisms to Manage Disasters1.2-Change in Emergency Condition
1.1-Basic Needs
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Number of Results by Mission Indicator
2012 2011
1.1 - Emergency Relief
1.2 - Change in Condition
2.1 - Mechanisms to Manage Disasters
2.2 - Reduced Vunerability to Disasters
3.1 - Access to Health
3.2 - Improved Health
4.1 - Household Prosperity
5.1 - Collective Action
5.2 - Partner Capacity
6.1 - Improved Markets
6.2 - New Jobs Created
7.1 - Marginalized Capacity
7.2 - Marginalized Participation
8.1 - Sectors Interacting
9.1 - Improved Peace and Security
9.2 - Mechanisms to Manage Conflict
9.3 - Improved Relationships
10.1 - Communities Engaged
10.2 - Accountable Government
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
2012 MM Indicator Results - Reported vs. Aligned
Reported Aligned
35
10
Emergency Beneficiaries
2010 2011 20120
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
Water & Sanitation Cash Health Shelter/NFI Food
35
11
Results - Economic Development
35
12
Results - Economic Development
35
Benefits and Strengths - Agency
- Demonstrates commitment to accountability and critical self-
reflection
- Fosters shared language and values between Agency and field
programs
- ‘Real data’ behind the meaningful change we affect
- Means for assessing strategic impact when reviewing and planning
- Highlights gaps we might not have seen otherwise
35
Benefits and Strengths - Field
- Connection to agency Mission and other program achievements
- Opportunity to review collective results at country and regional
level
- Lens for reflecting on measurement quality and practices
- Platform for standardization and improvement of indicators and
tools
- Higher profile for M&E staff and responsibilities
Lessons Learned
Focus early and often on use – what questions do you want to answer?
Engage everyone you can in the process – all stages
Link closely to program M&E processes - no extra data
Allocate quality IT and data management systems
Give it time – it may take years to develop and fully embed
Limit expectations as you go – can’t be all things to all people
Keep track of the successes and examples of how it is used