Upload
lmaraujo67
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 34683575 Complex Roots Paper
1/3
Visualizing Complex Roots
Jason M. Bryer
The College of Saint [email protected]
home.nycap.rr.com/jbryer
When one first encounters the quadratic polynomial, and shortly thereafter the quadratic formula,
one encounters the square root of a negative number. Someone may have told you that it is animaginary number, and that it represents the imaginary (complex) roots of the polynomial. You
may have posed the question, if we have a means of representing the real roots of a polynomialgeometrically, is there a way to represent the complex roots geometrically? Lets see...
Real roots or complex roots
Consider a quadratic polynomial cbxaxxf++=
2
)( , a, b, c
. When a polynomial of thisform is plotted in the Cartesian coordinate system, it is clear whether the polynomial has two,one or no real roots. Geometrically, the roots of a quadratic are the distance from the origin to
where the parabola crosses the x-axis.
Figure 1. Two real roots Figure 2. One (double) root Figure 3. No real roots
When there are no real roots, we know thaty=f(x) has two complex roots. But as shown above,
the complex roots are not visible using this geometric interpretation.
Locating the complex rootsRecall that by the quadratic formula we can find the roots of f(x) given by:
aacb
ab
24
2
2
However, if the discriminant is less than 0 (i.e. b2 4ac < 0), then there are two complex roots.These roots may be represented as;
iIRa
baci
a
b=
2
4
2
2
7/30/2019 34683575 Complex Roots Paper
2/3
Where R and I are the real and imaginary parts, respectively. The vertex has coordinates (-b/2a,
f(-b/2a)) or (R,aI2). We can then locate the line y = 2aI
2parallel to the x-axis by marking off
twice the distance of aI2
from (R,0) to (R,aI2) up to (R,2aI
2). However,
22)()( aIIRfIRf =+= . Therefore dropping perpendiculars from the intersections of y =
2aI2
and the parabola yields the points (R-I,0) and (R+I,0). The length R is measured from (0,0)
to (R,0) and the length I is measured from (R,0) to (R+I,0) or from (R-I,0) to (R,0) as shown infigure 4. And now we have a method to geometrically represent the complex roots of apolynomial. This is a particularly nice representation because it is similar to our traditional
method, that is, the roots are the distance from a point to where the quadratic crosses a horizontalline.
Figure 4 Figure 5
Finding roots through a line reflectionThe points (R-I,0) and (R+I,0) can be found in another, similar way. Since (R,aI
2) is the vertex
of the parabola, we can draw the line y = 2aI2 which is parallel to the x-axis and tangent to thevertex. Now reflect the parabola through this line as shown in figure 5 above. This new
parabola can be expressed asa
bcbxaxxf
2)(
22
+= . The points of intersection with the x-
axis are then (R-I,0) and (R+I,0). Again, the complex roots become visible.
The Modulus Surface
For a third method of representing the complex rootsgeometrically, consider the complex polynomial
cbzazzf ++= 2)( where a, b, c and z = x + iy. But first,
lets look at the real polynomial 1)( 2 ++= xxxf . From the graph
in figure 6 we know that there must be two complex roots.
Because we are only interested in the zeros of the polynomial, wecan treat the zeros as low points on a surface called the modulus
surface. If w is the complex number w = u + iv, then its modulus
is defined as 22|| vuw += , which is nonnegative. Now let us
aI2
aI2
y=2aI2
R I
R+IR-I
R+IR-I
y=2aI2
Figure 6. f(x)=x2+x+1
7/30/2019 34683575 Complex Roots Paper
3/3
consider the quadratic polynomial as a complex polynomial 1)( 2 ++= zzzf where z = x + iy,
then the modulus off(z) is |f(z)|. The modulus surface of the polynomial w =f(z) is the surface
defined by the three real variables, x, y, and |w|.
The zeros of a complex-valued function defined on the complex plane are the points of the
modulus surface that touch the complex plane, since the complex number w is zero if and only ifits modulus is zero.
Figure 7. |z2
+ z + 1| Figure 8. |z2
+ z 1|
Figure 8 above shows the modulus surface of z2
+z 1. Note that the two points where thesurface touches the complex plane are on the real axis, hence there are two real roots. Figure 7 is
the modulus surface of z2
+z + 1. Here, the surface touches the complex plane in exactly two
points as well. These points, 0,3,1 and 0,3,1 are exactly the complex roots, 31
of the quadratic polynomial 1)( 2 ++= xxxf .
These are only three methods of many to find the complex roots of a quadratic polynomial. Andit should be clear that the roots of a polynomial, if not real, are indeed not imaginary roots, but
complex roots.
References:Farnsworth, David, Measuring Complex Roots. Math and Computer Ed., V. 17 (1983), No. 3,
pp. 191-194.
Long, Cliff and Thomas Hern, Graphing the Complex Zeros of Polynomials Using ModulusSurfaces. College Math J., V. 20 (1988), No. 1, pp. 33-45.
Page, Warren, Complex Roots Made Visible. College Math J., V. 15 (1984), No. 3, pp. 248-
249.