33525999 Control Engg Notes

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    1/58

    Notes by B.K.Sridhar, NIE, Mysore

    CHAPTER II

    MATHEMATICAL MODELING

    2.1 Introduction: In chapter I we have learnt the basic concepts of control systems such

    as open loop and feed back control systems, different types of Control systems like

    regulator systems, follow-up systems and servo mechanisms. We have also discussed a

    few simple applications.

    The requirements of an ideal control system are many and depend on the system under

    consideration. Major requirements are 1) Stability 2) Accuracy and 3) Speed of

    Response. An ideal control system would be stable, would provide absolute accuracy

    (maintain zero error despite disturbances) and would respond instantaneously to a change

    in the reference variable. Such a system cannot, of course, be produced. However, study

    of automatic control system theory would provide the insight necessary to make the most

    effective compromises so that the engineer can design the best possible system.

    2.2 Modeling of Control Systems: The first step in the design and the analysis of control

    system is to build physical and mathematical models. A control system being a collection

    of several physical systems (sub systems) which may be of mechanical, electrical

    electronic, thermal, hydraulic or pneumatic type. No physical system can be represented

    in its full intricacies. Idealizing assumptions are always made for the purpose of analysis

    and synthesis. An idealized representation of physical system is called a Physical Model.

    1

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    2/58

    Control systems being dynamic systems in nature require a quantitative mathematical

    description of the system for analysis. This process of obtaining the desired mathematical

    description of the system is called Mathematical Modeling. The basic models of dynamic

    physical systems are differential equations obtained by the application of appropriate

    laws of nature. Having obtained the differential equations and where possible the

    numerical values of parameters, one can proceed with the analysis.

    Usually control systems are complex. As a first approximation a simplified model is built

    to get a general feeling for the solution. However, improved model which can give better

    accuracy can then be obtained for a complete analysis. Compromise has to be made

    between simplicity of the model and accuracy. It is difficult to consider all the details for

    mathematical analysis. Only most important features are considered to predict behaviour

    of the system under specified conditions.

    2.3 Modeling of Mechanical Systems: Mechanical systems can be idealized as spring-

    mass-damper systems and the governing differential equations can be obtained on the

    basis of Newtons second law of motion, which states that

    F = ma: for rectilinear motion

    T = I : for rotary motion

    2

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    3/58

    Sign Convention: Forces and torques in the direction of motion are positive

    Translational Systems:

    (i) Spring mass system:

    kx

    (ii)

    Friction less

    (iii) Spring mass damper system:

    3

    m

    F = ma

    m x = - kx

    mx + kx = 0

    ....

    x

    m

    k

    m

    x

    kx

    mx + kx = 0..

    m

    xm

    k

    c

    x

    k x (Spring Force)

    c x (damping Force).

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    4/58

    mx = - c x kx

    (iv) Spring Mass Damper System

    In the system shown a provision is made for an input displacement x at the top of the

    spring corresponding to which the mass is responding with a displacement of y.

    Let y > x

    4

    .. .

    mx + c x + kx = 0.. .

    m

    X (Input)

    Y (Response)

    m

    K(y)-x)

    c y

    .m

    kx

    c y

    .

    ky

    From NSL

    my = - k (y-x) - c y.. .

    my + c y + ky = kx.. .

    c

    k

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    5/58

    CHAPTER VI

    FREQUENCY RESPONSE

    6.1 Introduction

    We have discussed about the system response to step and ramp input in time domain

    earlier in Chapter 3. When input signals are frequency dependent, frequency response

    assume greater importance. In such systems the time domain analysis is difficult from the

    design point of view.

    Frequency response of a control system refers to the steady state response of a system

    subject to sinusoidal input of fixed (constant) amplitude but frequency varying over a

    specific range, usually from 0 to . For linear systems the frequency of input and output

    signal remains the same, while the ratio of magnitude of output signal to the input signal

    and phase between two signals may change. Frequency response analysis is a

    complimentary method to time domain analysis (step and ramp input analysis). It deals

    with only steady state and measurements are taken when transients have disappeared.

    Hence frequency response tests are not generally carried out for systems with large time

    constants.

    The frequency response information can be obtained either by analytical methods or by

    experimental methods, if the system exits. The concept and procedure is illustrated in

    Figure 6.1 (a) in which a linear system is subjected to a sinusoidal input. I(t) = a Sin t

    and the corresponding output is O(t) = b Sin ( t + ) as shown in Figure 6.1 (b).

    5

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    6/58

    Figure 6.1 (a) Figure 6.1 (b)

    The following quantities are very important in frequency response analysis.

    M ( ) = b/a = ratio of amplitudes = Magnitude ratio or Magnification factor or gain.

    ( ) = = phase shift or phase angle

    These factors when plotted in polar co-ordinates give polar plot, or when plotted in

    rectangular co-ordinates give rectangular plot which depict the frequency response

    characteristics of a system over entire frequency range in a single plot.

    6.2 Frequency Response Data

    The following procedure can be adopted in obtaining data analytically for frequency

    response analysis.

    1. Obtain the transfer function of the system

    )()()(SISOSF = , Where F (S) is transfer function, O(S) and I(S) are the Laplace

    transforms of the output and input respectively.

    2. Replace S by (j ) (As S is a complex number)

    )(

    )()(

    jI

    jOjF =

    )()()(

    )(

    jBA

    jI

    jO+==

    (another complex number)

    3. For various values of , ranging from 0 to determine M ( ) and .

    jBAjBAjI

    jOM +=+== )()(

    )(

    )()(

    6

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    7/58

    22 BAM +=

    jBAjI

    jO+==

    )(

    )(

    AB1tan =

    4. Plot the results from step 3 in polar co-ordinates or rectangular co-ordinates.

    These plots are not only convenient means for presenting frequency response data but

    are also serve as a basis for analytical and design methods.

    6.3 Comparison between Time Domain and Frequency Domain Analysis

    An interesting and revealing comparison of frequency and time domain approaches is

    based on the relative stability studies of feedback systems. The Rouths criterion is a time

    domain approach which establishes with relative ease the stability of a system, but its

    adoption to determine the relative stability is involved and requires repeated application

    of the criterion. The Root Locus method is a very powerful time domain approach as it

    reveals not only stability but also the actual time response of the system. On the other

    hand, the Nyquist criterion (discussed later in this Chapter) is a powerful frequency

    domain method of extracting the information regarding stability as well as relative

    stability of a system without the need to evaluate roots of the characteristic equation.

    6.4 Graphical Methods to Represent Frequency Response Data

    Two graphical techniques are used to represent the frequency response data. They are: 1)

    Polar plots 2) Rectangular plots.

    6.5Polar Plot

    7

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    8/58

    The frequency response data namely magnitude ratio M( ) and phase angle ( ) when

    represented in polar co-ordinates polar plots are obtained. The plot is plotted in complex

    plane shown in Figure 6.2. It is also called Nyquist plot. As is varied the magnitude

    and phase angle change and if the magnitude ratio M is plotted for varying phase angles,

    the locus obtained gives the polar plot. It is easier to construct a polar plot and ready

    information of magnitude ratio and phase angle can be obtained.

    Figure 6.2: Complex Plane Representation

    A typical polar plot is shown in Figure 6.3 in which the magnitude ratio M and phase

    angle at a given value of can be readily obtained.

    8

    M

    Real

    Img

    0, + 360, -360

    +90, -270

    +180, -180

    +270, -90

    Positive angles

    Negative angles

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    9/58

    Figure 6.3: A Typical Polar Plot

    6.6 Rectangular Plot

    The frequency response data namely magnitude ratio M( ) and phase angle ( ) can

    also be presented in rectangular co-ordinates and then the plots are referred as Bode plots

    which will be discussed in Chapter 7.

    6.7 Illustrations on Polar Plots: Following examples illustrate the procedure followed in

    obtaining the polar plots.

    Illustration 1: A first order mechanical system is subjected to a input x(t). Obtain the

    polar plot, if the time constant of the system is 0.1 sec.

    9

    x (t) (input)

    y (t) (output)

    C

    K

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    10/58

    Transfer function F(S) = 1

    1

    )(

    )(

    += SSX

    SY

    Given = 0.1 sec

    SSSX

    SY

    1.01

    1

    11.0

    1

    )(

    )(

    +=

    +=

    To obtain the polar plot (i.e., frequency response data) replace S by j .

    )1.0(1

    1

    11.0

    1

    )(

    )(

    jjjX

    jY

    +=

    +=

    Magnification Factor M =)1.0(1

    )0(1

    )1.0(1

    1

    )(

    )(

    j

    j

    jjX

    jY

    +

    +=

    +

    =

    2)1.0(1

    1

    +=M

    Phase angle = )1.01()0(1)()(

    )(

    ++=== jXjjY

    jX

    jY

    )1.0(tan1

    0tan 11

    =

    )1.0(tan 1 =

    10

    Governing Differential Equation:

    KxKydt

    dyC =+. by K

    xydtdyKC =+.

    xydt

    dy=+. Take Laplace transform

    SY(S) + Y(S) = X(S)

    (S+1) Y(S) = X(S)

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    11/58

    Now obtain the values of M and for different values of ranging from 0 to asgiven in Table 6.1.

    Table 6.1 Frequency Response Data

    2)1.0(1

    1+

    =M )1.0(tan1

    =

    0 1.00 0

    2 0.98 -11.13

    4 0.928 -21.8

    5 0.89 -26.6

    6 0.86 -30.9

    10 0.707 -45

    20 0.45 -63.4

    40 0.24 -76

    50 0.196 -78.69

    100 0.099 -84.29

    0 -90

    The data from Table 6.1 when plotted on the complex plane with as a parameter polar

    plot is obtained as given below.

    Illustration 2: A second order system has a natural frequency of 10 rad/sec and a

    damping ratio of 0.5. Sketch the polar plot for the system.

    11

    = 6

    = 50

    = 20

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    12/58

    The transfer function of the system is given by

    22

    2

    2)(

    )(

    nn

    n

    SSSX

    SY

    ++

    = Given n = 10 rad/sec and = 0.5

    10010

    100

    )(

    )(2 ++

    =SSSX

    SY

    Replace S by j

    10010

    )0(100

    10010)(

    100

    )(

    )(22

    ++

    +=

    ++==

    j

    j

    jjjX

    jYas 1=j

    222

    2

    2)10()100(

    100

    )10()100(

    )0(100

    )(

    )(

    +=

    +

    +==

    j

    j

    jX

    jYM

    Magnification Factor = 222 )10()100(

    100

    +=M

    Phase angle = )10()100()0(100)10()100(

    )0(100 22

    jjj

    j ++=+

    +=

    =

    2

    11

    100

    10tan

    100

    0tan

    Now obtain the values of M and for various value of ranging from 0 to as givenin the following Table 6.2.

    12

    m

    x (Input)

    y (Response)

    C

    K

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    13/58

    Table 6.2 Frequency Response Data: Illustration 2

    M( ) 0 1.00 0.0

    2 1.02 -11.85 1.11 -33.7

    8 1.14 -65.8

    10 1.00 -90.0

    12 0.78 -110.1

    15 0.51 -129.8

    20 0.28 -146.3

    40 0.06 -165.1

    70 0.02 -171.7

    0.00 -180.0

    The data from Table 6.2 when plotted on the complex plane with as a parameter polar

    plot is obtained as given below.

    Note: The polar plot intersects the imaginary axis at a frequency equal to the natural

    frequency of the system = n = 10 rad/sec.

    Illustration 3: Obtain the polar plot for the transfer function

    )1(

    10)(

    +=S

    SF Replace S by j

    13

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    14/58

    1

    10)(

    +=

    j

    jF

    1

    10)()(

    2 +==

    jFM

    ( ) = F (j ) = 10 - (j +1)

    1tan 1

    =

    Table 6.3 Frequency Response Data: Illustration 3

    M( ) 0 1.00 0

    0.2 9.8 -11

    0.4 9.3 -21

    0.6 8.6 -31

    0.8 7.8 -39

    2.0 4.5 -63

    3.0 3.2 -72

    4.0 2.5 -76

    5.0 1.9 -79

    10 0.99 -84

    0.00 -90

    Polar plot for Illustration 3

    14

    =

    M( ) = 0

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    15/58

    6.8 Guidelines to Sketch Polar Plots

    Polar plots for some typical transfer function can be sketched on the following guidelines.

    I )(

    )(

    ))((SFjBA

    jfe

    jdcjba=+=

    +

    ++--- (Transfer function)

    Magnitude Ratio =22

    2222*

    fe

    dcba

    jfe

    jdcjbaM

    +

    ++=

    +

    ++=

    Phase angle:

    ( )( )( )

    )()()( jfejdcjbajfe

    jdcjba++++=

    +

    ++=

    e

    f

    c

    d

    a

    b 111tantantan

    +=

    II Values of tan functions

    IQ: tan-1

    (b/a) Positive:

    IIQ: tan-1 (b/-a) Negative: 180 -

    IIIQ: tan-1 (-b/-a) Positive: 180 +

    IVQ: tan-1 (-b/a) Negative: 360 -

    tan-1 (0) = 00 tan-1 (-0) =1800

    tan-1 (1) = 450 tan-1 (-1) = 1350

    tan-1 () = 900 tan-1 (-) = 2700

    15

    Real

    ImgIQ

    IIQ

    IIIQ IVQ

    (a+jb)

    (-a-jb) (a-jb)

    (-a+jb)

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    16/58

    III Let K = Constant

    = K + j(0)

    Therefore KKK =+= 22 0 Applicable for both K>0 and K0

    = tan-1 (-0) = 1800, if K

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    17/58

    = tan-1 ( /0) + tan-1 ( /0)+ . . . . . . . . . . . . n times

    = 900 + 900 + . . . . . . . . . . . . n times

    Sn = n * 900

    Illustration 4: Sketch the polar plot for the system represented by the following open loop

    transfer function.

    )2)(10(

    10)()(

    ++=

    SSSSHSG , obtain M and for different values of

    i) As 0,0 S jS=

    ==== 0

    5.05.0

    2*10*

    10)()( 0

    SSSHSG S

    S= 5.0

    0900=

    090=

    ii) As S,

    010

    ))((

    10)()(

    3=== SSSS

    SHSGS

    310 S=

    027090*30 ==

    17

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    18/58

    Illustration 5: Sketch the polar plots for the system represented by the following open

    loop transfer function.

    M()

    ( )

    0 -900

    0 -2700

    18

    Real

    Img

    0

    -90

    -180

    -270

    = , M = 0

    = 0, M =

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    19/58

    )5()()(

    2 +=SS

    KSHSG

    i) As 0,0 S jS=

    , S is far lesser than 5 and can be neglected

    22

    5/

    5 S

    K

    S

    K==

    ===n

    K

    S

    KM

    2

    5/)(

    2

    5/)(

    S

    K

    = 2)5/( SK = = 0 2*90 = 0 180 = - 1800

    ii) As S,

    32 )5()()( S

    K

    SS

    K

    SHSG S =+=

    0)(33===

    K

    S

    KM

    3)( SK =

    = 0 - 3*90 = - 2700

    19

    )5()()(

    200

    +

    =

    SS

    KSHSG

    S

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    20/58

    M()

    ( )

    0 -1800

    0 -2700

    20

    Real

    Img

    0

    -90

    -180

    -270

    = , M = 0 = 0, M =

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    21/58

    Illustration 6: Sketch the polar plots for the system represented by the following open

    loop transfer function.

    )8)(5(

    10)()( 2 ++= SSSSHSG

    i) As 0,0 S jS=

    2200

    4/1

    8.5.

    1 0)()(

    SSSHSG

    S==

    ====0

    4/14/14/1)(

    22 S

    M

    24/1)( S=

    = 0 - 2*90

    = - 2*900 = 1800

    ii) As S,

    42

    1

    ..

    1 0)()(

    SSSSSHSG

    S==

    44

    1010)(

    ==S

    M

    as , M ( ) = 0

    21

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    22/58

    410)( S=

    = 0 4*90 = - 3600

    Illustration 7: Sketch the polar plots for the system represented by the following open

    loop transfer function.

    )5)(4(

    )2(10)()(

    3

    ++

    +=

    SSS

    SSHSG

    i) As 0,0 S jS=

    M()

    ( )

    0 -1800

    0 -3600

    22

    Real

    Img

    0, -360

    -90

    -180

    -270

    = , M = 0 = 0, M =

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    23/58

    )5) (4(

    )2(1 0)()(

    300

    ++

    +==

    SSS

    SSHSG

    S

    33

    1

    5.4.

    2.10

    SS==

    ===33

    11)(

    S

    M

    31)( S= = 0 3*90 = - 2700

    ii) As S,

    43

    1

    )..

    .1 0)()(

    SSSS

    SSHSG

    S===

    01010

    )(44===

    S

    M

    410)( S= = 0 4*90 = -3600

    23

    Img-270

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    24/58

    M()

    ( )

    0 -2700

    0 -3600

    24

    Real

    0, -360

    -90

    -180

    = , M = 0

    = 0, M =

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    25/58

    Illustration 8: Sketch the polar plots for the system represented by the following open

    loop transfer function.

    )4)(2(

    10)()(

    +=

    SSSSHSG

    i) As 0,0 S jS=

    SSSHSG

    S8/1 0

    4) .2(1 0)()(

    00

    =

    ==

    ==

    =

    8/108/10)(S

    M

    S= 8/10)( = 1800 - 900 = 900

    ii) As S,

    3

    1)()(

    SSHSG

    S==

    01010

    )(33===

    S

    M

    310)( S= = 0 3*900 = - 2700

    25

    -270+90

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    26/58

    Illustration 9: Sketch the polar plot for the system represented by the following transfer

    function.

    10010

    100

    )(

    )(2

    +=

    SSSX

    SY

    M()

    ( )

    0 900

    0 -2700

    26

    Real

    Img

    0, -360

    +270-90

    +180-180

    = , M = 0

    = 0, M =

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    27/58

    i) As 0,0 S jS=

    11)( ==M , for both K positive and negative

    01801)( ==

    ii) As S,

    2

    100

    S= 0

    100)(

    2== S

    SM ,

    2

    100)(S

    = = 0 2* =- 900*2

    = -1800

    6.9 Experimental determination of Frequency Response

    Many a times the transfer function of a physical system may not be available in suchcircumstances it is necessary to obtain frequency response information experimentally.

    Such data may then be used to establish the transfer function. This method requires the

    actual system.

    6.10 System Analysis using Polar Plots: Nyquist Criterion: Continued in Session 21

    on 17.10.2006

    CONTINUED IN SESSION 21: 17.10.2006

    ******************END****************

    M()

    ( )0 1 1800

    0 -1800

    27

    Real

    Img

    0, -360

    +270

    -90

    +180

    -180

    -270

    +90

    = 0, M = 1 = , M = 0

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    28/58

    CHAPTER VI

    FREQUENCY RESPONSE

    (Continued from Session 20)

    SYSTEM ANALYSIS USING POLAR PLOTS: NYQUIST

    CRITERION

    6.10 System Analysis using Polar Plots: Nyquist Criterion

    Polar plots can be used to predict feed back control system stability by the application of

    Nyquist Criterion, and therefore are also referred as Nyquist Plots. It is a labor saving

    technique in the analysis of dynamic behaviour of control systems in which the need for

    finding roots of characteristic equation of the system is eliminated.

    Consider a typical closed loop control system which may be represented by the simplified

    block diagram as shown in Figure 6.4

    Figure 6.4 Simplified System Block Diagram

    The closed-loop transfer function or the relationship between the output and input of the

    system is given by

    28

    H(S)

    G(S)C(S)

    R(S) +

    -

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    29/58

    )()(1

    )(

    )(

    )(

    SHSG

    SG

    SR

    SC

    +=

    The open-loop transfer function is G(S) H(S) (the transfer function with the feedback

    loop broken at the summing point).

    1+ G(S) H(S) is called Characteristic Function which when equated to zero gives the

    Characteristic Equation of the system.

    1 + G(S) H(S) = 0 Characteristic Equation

    The characteristic function F(S) = 1 + G(S) H(S) can be expressed as the ratio of two

    factored polynomials.

    Let).().........)()((

    )....().........)(()()(1)(

    321

    21

    n

    k

    n

    ZSPSPSPSS

    ZSZSZSKSHSGSF

    ++++

    +++=+=

    The Characteristic equation in general can be represented as

    F(S) = K (S+Z1) (S+Z2) (S+Z3) . (S+Zn) = 0

    Then:

    Z1, -Z2, -Z3 . Zn are the roots of the characteristic equation

    at S= -Z1, S= -Z2, S= -Z3, 1+ G(S) H(S) becomes zero.

    These values of S are termed as Zeros of F(S)

    Similarly:

    at S= -P1, S= -P2, S= -P3 . Etc. 1+ G (S) H (S) becomes infinity.

    These values are called Poles of F (S).

    6.10.1 Condition for Stability

    For stable operation of control system all the roots of characteristic equation must

    be negative real numbers or complex numbers with negative real parts. Therefore,

    29

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    30/58

    for a system to be stable all the Zeros of characteristic equation (function) should be

    either negative real numbers or complex numbers with negative real parts. These roots

    can be plotted on a complex-plane or S-plane in which the imaginary axis divides the

    complex plane in to two parts: right half plane and left half plane. Negative real numbers

    or complex numbers with negative real parts lie on the left of S-plane as shown Figure

    6.5.

    Figure 6.5 Two halves of Complex Plane

    Therefore the roots which are positive real numbers or complex numbers with positive

    real parts lie on the right-half of S-plane.

    In view of this, the condition for stability can be stated as For a system to be stable all

    the zeros of characteristic equation should lie on the left half of S-plane.

    Therefore, the procedure for investigating system stability is to search for Zeros on the

    right half of S-plane, which would lead the system to instability, if present. However, it is

    impracticable to investigate every point on S-plane as to which half of S-plane it belongs

    to and so it is necessary to have a short-cut method. Such a procedure for searching the

    30

    2+j1

    2-j1

    -3-j2

    -3+j2

    Real

    Img Right half of

    S Plane

    Left half of S

    Plane

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    31/58

    right half of S-plane for the presence of Zeros and interpretation of this procedure on the

    Polar plot is given by the Nyquist Criterion.

    6.10.2 Nyquist Criterion: Cauchys Principle of Argument:

    In order to investigate stability on the Polar plot, it is first necessary to correlate the

    region of instability on the S-plane with identification of instability on the polar plot, or

    1+GH plane. The 1+GH plane is frequently the name given to the plane where 1+G(S)

    H(S) is plotted in complex coordinates with S replaced by j . Likewise, the plot of G(S)

    H(S) with S replaced by j is often termed as GH plane. This terminology is adopted in

    the remainder of this discussion.

    The Nyquist Criterion is based on the Cauchys principle of argument of complex

    variable theory. Consider [F(S) = 1+G(S) H(S)] be a single valued rational function

    which is analytic everywhere in a specified region except at a finite number of points in

    S-plane. (A function F(S) is said to be analytic if the function and all its derivatives

    exist). The points where the function and its derivatives does not exist are called singular

    points. The poles of a point are singular points.

    Let CS be a closed path chosen in S-plane as shown Figure 6.6 (a) such that the function

    F(S) is analytic at all points on it. For each point on CS represented on S-plane there is a

    corresponding mapping point in F(S) plane. Thus when mapping is made on F(S) plane,

    the curve CG mapped by the function F(S) plane is also a closed path as shown in Figure

    6.6 (b). The direction of traverse of CG in F(S) plane may be clockwise or counter

    clockwise, depending upon the particular function F(S).

    31

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    32/58

    Then the Cauchy principle of argument states that: The mapping made on F(S) plane

    will encircle its origin as many number of times as the difference between the

    number of Zeros and Poles of F(S) enclosed by the S-plane locus CS in the S-plane.

    Figure 6.6 (a) Figure 6.6 (b)

    32

    S-plane+j

    -j

    S5

    S1

    S2

    S3S4

    CS-

    +j

    -j

    -

    GS1

    GS2

    GS3

    GS4

    GS5

    (0+j )CG

    F(S) = 1+G(S) H(S) plane

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    33/58

    Figure 6.6 Mapping on S-plane and F(S) plane

    Thus N = Z P

    N0+j0 = Z P

    Where N0+j0: Number of encirclements made by F(S) plane plot (CG) about its

    origin. Z and P: Number of Zeros and Poles of F(S) respectively enclosed by the locus

    CS in the S-plane.

    Illustration: Consider a function F(S)

    )25)(25)(5)(3(

    )22)(22)(1()(

    jSjSSSS

    jSjSSKSF +++++ ++++=

    Zeros: -1, (-2-j2), (-2+j2) indicated by O (dots) in the S-plane

    Poles: 0, -3, -5, (-5 j2), (-5 +j2) indicated by X (Cross) in S-plane: As shown in Figure

    6.6 (c)

    33

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    34/58

    Figure 6.6 (c) Figure 6.6 (d)

    Now consider path CS1 (CCW) on S-plane for which:

    Z: 2, P =1

    34

    S-plane+j

    -j

    CS2

    -

    CS1

    O: ZEROS

    X: POLES

    +j

    -j

    CG2

    -

    CG1

    CG2

    CG2

    (0+j0)

    F(S) = 1+G(S) H(S) plane

    CS1

    CS2

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    35/58

    Consider another path CS2 (CCW) in the same S plane for which:

    Z = 1, P = 4

    CG1 and CG2 are the corresponding paths on F(S) plane [Figure 6.6 (d)].

    Considering CG1 [plot corresponding to CS1 on F (S) plane]

    N0+j0 = Z P = 2-1 = +1

    CG1 will encircle the origin once in the same direction of CS1 (CCW)

    Similarly for the path CG2

    N0+j0 = Z P = 1 4 = - 3

    CG2 will encircle the origin 3 times in the opposite direction of CS2 (CCW)Note: The mapping on F(S) plane will encircle its origin as many number of times as the

    difference between the number of Zeros and Poles of F(S) enclosed by the S-plane locus.

    From the above it can be observed that

    In the expression

    N= Z - P,

    N can be positive when: Z>P

    N = 0 when: Z = P

    N can be negative when: Z

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    36/58

    N is negative the map CG encircles the origin N times in the opposite direction as

    that of CS

    6.10.3 Nyquist Path and Nyquist Plot

    The above Cauchys principle of argument can be used to investigate the stability of

    control systems. We have seen that if the Zeros of characteristic function lie on the right

    half of S-plane it will lead to system instability. Now, to encircle the entire right half of

    S-plane, select a closed path as shown in Figure 6.6 (e) such that all the Zeros lying on

    the right-half of S-plane will lie inside this path. This path in S-plane is known as

    Nyquist path. Nyquist path is generally taken in CCW direction. This path consists of

    the imaginary axis of the S-plane (S = 0+j , - < < ) and a closing semicircle of

    infinite radius. If the system being tested has poles of F(S) on the imaginary axis, it is

    customary to modify the contour as shown Figure 6.6 (f) excluding these poles from the

    path.

    36

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    37/58

    Figure 6.6 (e): Nyquist Path Figure 6.6 (f)

    37

    S-plane

    +j

    -j

    -

    -j

    +j

    0+j00-j0

    r =

    +j

    -j

    -

    S=+j0

    S= -j0

    r =

    S= -j

    r 0

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    38/58

    Corresponding to the Nyquist path a plot can be mapped on F(S) = 1+G(S) H(S) plane as

    shown in Figure 6.6 (g) and the number of encirclements made by this F(S) plot about its

    origin can be counted.

    Figure 6.6 (g)

    Now from the principle of argument

    N0+j0 = Z-P

    N0+j0 = number of encirclements made by F(S) plane plot

    Z, P: Zeros and Poles lying on right half of S-plane

    For the system to be stable: Z = 0

    N0+j0 = - P Condition for StabilityApart from this, the Nyquist path can also be mapped on G(S) H(S) plane (Open-loop

    transfer function plane) as shown in Figure 6.6 (h).

    Now consider

    F(S) = 1+ G(S) H(S) for which the origin is (0+j0) as shown in Figure 6.6 (g).

    Therefore G(S) H(S) = F(S) 1

    = (0+j0) 1 = (-1+j0) Coordinates for origin on G(S) H(S) plane as shown

    in Figure 6.6(h)

    38

    ImgG(S) H(S) plane

    Real

    Img

    Real

    Img

    0+j0

    1+ G(S) H(S) plane

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    39/58

    Figure 6.6 (h)

    Thus a path on 1+ G(S) H(S) plane can be easily converted to a path on G(S) H(S) plane

    or open loop transfer function plane. This path will be identical to that of 1+G(S) H(S)

    path except that the origin is now shifted to the left by one as shown in Figure 6.6 (h).

    This concept can be made use of by making the plot in G(S) H(S) plane instead of 1+

    G(S) H(S) plane. The plot made on G(S) H(S) plane is termed as the Niquist Plot and its

    net encirclements about (-1+j0) (known as critical point) will be the same as the number

    of net encirclements made by F(S) plot in the F(S) = 1+G(S) H(S) plane about the origin.

    Now, the principle of argument now can be re-written as

    N-1+j0 = Z-P

    Where N-1+j0 = Number ofnet encirclements made by the G(S) H(S) plot (Nyquist Plot)

    in the G(S) H(S) plane about -1+j0

    For a system to be stable Z = 0

    N-1+j0 = -P

    Thus the Nyquist Criterion for a stable system can be stated as The number of net

    encirclements made by the Nyquist plot in the G(S) H(S) plane about the critical

    point (-1+j0) is equal to the number of poles of F(S) lying in right half of S-plane.

    39

    0+j0

    (-1+j0)

    Origin of the plotfor G(S) H(S)

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    40/58

    [Encirclements if any will be in the opposite direction. Poles of F(S) are the same as

    the poles of G(S) H(S)].

    Thus the stability of closed-loop control system is determined from its open-loop transfer

    function.

    CONTINUED IN SESSION 22: 18.10.2006

    ******************END****************

    CHAPTER VI

    FREQUENCY RESPONSE(Continued from Session 21)

    6.10.4 System Analysis using Nyquist Criterion: Illustrations

    Illustration 1: Sketch the Nyquist plot for the system represented by the open loop

    transfer function and comment on its stability.

    0,0)(

    )()( >>+

    aKaSS

    KSHSG Poles: S = 0 (on imaginary axis) and S = -a

    Step 1: Define Nyquist path. Let the Nyquist path be defined as given below.

    40

    +j

    -j

    S=+j0

    S= -j0

    r =

    S= -j

    r 0-

    S= -j

    Nyquist Path

    S= +j

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    41/58

    Section I: S = +j to S = +j0; Section II: S = +j0 to S = -j0

    Section III: S = -j0 to S = -j; Section IV: S = -j to S = +j

    2. Corresponding to different sections namely I, II, III, and IV Obtain polar plots on G(S)

    H(S) plane, which are nothing but Nyquist Plots.

    Nyquist Plot for Section I: In S-plane section I runs from S= + j to S = +j0To obtain polar plot in G(S) H(S) plane:

    0,0)(

    )()( >>+

    aKaSS

    KSHSG

    (i) 2)()( S

    KSHSG jS = ,

    0)()(2==

    S

    KSHSG

    2

    2)()( SK

    S

    KSHSG ==

    = 0 2*900 = - 1800

    (ii) ====S

    K

    S

    aK

    aS

    KSHSG jS

    1

    0.

    )()( ,

    G(S) H(S) = K/a S = 0 - 900 = - 900

    41

    Img G(S) H(S) Plane

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    42/58

    Nyquist Plot for Section II: In S-plane section II runs from S= + j0 to S = -j0

    In this region 0S

    In S-plane section II is a semicircle from S = + j0 to S = -j0 of radius r 00, covering an

    angle of 1800 in clockwise direction

    S

    K

    aS

    KSHSG

    1

    )()()( == where K1 = K/a

    But S = re+j equation of a circle in exponential form

    wherere

    KSHSG j

    j,Re)()(

    1

    +==

    r

    KR

    1

    =

    G(S) H(S) = R.e-j

    =r

    KR

    1

    (as r is very small)

    S M()

    ( )

    S 0 -1800

    0S -900

    42

    S=j0

    Real

    -900

    S=j

    -1800

    Section I

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    43/58

    This shows that G(S) H(S) plot of section II of Nyquist path is a circle of radius = starting from S = +j0 and ending at a point S = -j0 covering an angle of 180 0 in oppositedirection of section II of Nyquist path (CCW direction i.e., negative sign)

    In general if G (S) H (S) =nS

    K1

    jn

    jnneR

    er

    KSHSG

    +== .)()(

    1

    Where R = nr

    K1

    The G (S) H (S) plot will be a portion circle (part) of radius R , starting at a point S= +j and ending at a point S = -j covering an angle of (n*180 0) in the opposite direction

    (CCW) (since sign is negative)

    Nyquist Plot for Section III: In S-plane section III runs from S= -j0 to S = j

    )()()( 0

    aSS

    KSHSG jS

    +=

    SKaS

    K/

    .

    1== where Kl = (K/a)

    == SKSHSG /)()(1

    G(S) H(S) = Kl S, Kl is negative

    = -Kl S

    G(S) H(S) = 1800 900 = 900

    =+

    = jSjSaSS

    KSHSG

    )()()( = K/S2

    43

    S=j0

    S= -j0

    Real

    Img

    R=

    G(S) H(S) Plane

    Section II

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    44/58

    0)()(2==

    S

    KSHSG

    G(S) H(S) = K - S2 = 0 2 (-900) = 1800 ; (S is negative)

    This Section III is the mirror image of section of the Section I.

    Nyquist Plot for Section IV: In S-plane section IV runs from S= -j to S = j

    In this region S

    In the S-plane it is a semicircle of radius R from S = - j to S = + j covering anangle of 1800 in the counter clockwise direction.

    In the G(S) H(S) plane

    2)()(

    S

    KSHSG

    S =

    But S = R e+j

    Equation in circle in exponential form

    2

    22.

    .)()( j

    jer

    eR

    KSHSG == where 02 =

    R

    Kr

    Thus G(S) H(S) plot for section IV is also a circle of radius 0r starting at S = - j andending at S = + j covering an angle of 2* 1800 (2 ) in the opposite direction (CW).

    44

    S= -j

    S= -j0

    +900

    +1800

    Section III

    G(S) H(S) Plane

    Real

    Img

    ImgG(S) H(S) Plane

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    45/58

    Now assemble the Nyquist plots of all the sections as given below to get the overall

    Nyquist plot

    From Nyquist Criterion:

    No. of encirclements made by Nyquist plot about ( 1 +j0) = N-1+j0 = Z P

    P = No. of poles lying in the right half of S plane

    45

    S= +j

    S= -j

    RealSection IV

    r 0

    Real

    ImgG(S) H(S) Plane

    (-1+j0)

    j0

    j

    -j0

    -j

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    46/58

    For the function)(

    )()(aSS

    KSHSG

    += , the Poles are: S = 0, S = - a = 0, which lie on

    the left half of S-plane

    Therefore P = 0: Number of poles on the right half of S-plane

    N-1+j=0= 0 as counted from the Nyquist plot

    N-1+j0 = Z P

    0 = Z 0

    Therefore Z = 0

    Number of zeros lying on the right half of S-plane is 0 and hence the system is stable

    Illustration 2: Obtain the Nyquist diagram for the system represented by the block

    diagram given below and comment on its stability

    )1()(

    2 +=SS

    KSG

    SSH =)(

    ,)1(

    *)1(

    )()(2 +

    =+

    =SS

    KS

    SS

    KSHSG

    Poles are S = 0, -1/ P =

    0

    Solution is same as that of Illustration 1

    CONTINUED IN THE NEXT PART OF THE NOTES

    ******************END****************

    46

    R (S) +C (S)

    )1(2 +SS

    K

    S

    -

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    47/58

    CHAPTER II

    MATHEMATICAL MODELING (Continued)(Continued from session III: 30.08.2006)

    2.3.2 Models for Translational Systems:

    Illustration 1: Figure 2.7 shows a spring mass system that represents the simplest

    possible mechanical system. It is a single DOF system since one coordinate (x) is

    sufficient to specify the position of mass at any time.

    Figure 2.7: Spring Mass System Figure 2.7 a: Free Body Diagram

    Using Newtons second law of motion, we will consider the derivation of the equation of

    motion in this section. The procedure we will use can be summarized as follows:

    1) Select a suitable coordinate (x) to describe the position of the mass or rigid body

    in the system. Use a linear coordinate to describe the linear motion of a point mass or

    the centroid of a rigid body, and an angular coordinate ( ) to describe the angular

    motion of a rigid body.

    2) Determine the static equilibrium configuration of the system and measure the

    displacement of the mass or rigid body from its static equilibrium position.

    47

    mmx

    KKx (Spring force)

    Static equilibrium position

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    48/58

    3) Draw the free-body diagram of the mass or rigid body when a positive

    displacement and velocity are given to it. Indicate all the active and reactive forces

    acting on the mass or rigid body.

    4) Apply Newtons second law of motion to the mass or rigid body shown by the

    free-body diagram. Newtons second law of motion can be stated as follows:

    Note:

    1. Spring Force: Stiffness*displacement = K*x

    2. Sign Convention: Forces and torques in the direction of motion are positive.

    Therefore in the above example spring force (Kx) is to be taken negative as it is in the

    direction opposite to that of displacement (motion).

    Illustration 2: Here the mass m slides on a frictionless surface. Therefore there is no

    damping

    Figure 2.8:

    From NSL

    Kx

    m

    x

    Friction less surfacem

    K

    48

    F = ma ---- Newtons Second Law of Motion

    m x = - Kx

    mx + Kx = 0

    ..

    ..

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    49/58

    F = ma

    m x = - Kx

    mx + Kx = 0

    Points to Note:

    The displacement of the mass is to be considered zero with the system at equilibrium i.e.,

    the spring is neither stretched nor compressed

    Sign Convention: Adopted sign convention must not be changed during the course of the

    problem

    All the forces / torque in the direction of the displacement are considered positive,

    otherwise, negative

    Behaviour of the system is independent of the sign convention

    Illustration 3: The weight of the mass was not factor in the system just analyzed.

    However, weight is a factor in the spring mass system shown in figure 2.9

    Figure 2.9:

    From NSL

    F = ma

    m x = k ( x) - mg

    k ( x)

    x

    k

    m mg

    x

    49

    ..

    ..

    Position with sprinrelaxed

    Reference position

    (x = 0)

    ..

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    50/58

    = k kx mg

    = (mg / k) = Static deflection

    mx = - kx mx + kx = 0

    The weight of the mass has no effect on the differential equation when the reference is at

    the equilibrium position. Hence, the differential equation is same as that of the previous

    system in which weight was not a factor.

    Illustration 4: Figure 2.10 (a) shows a spring mass damper system and a corresponding

    free body diagram is shown in figure 2.10 (b) which assumes positive (downward)

    displacement and velocity. If the reference x = 0 is chosen at the equilibrium position, the

    mass can be considered weight less. Both the spring force and the damping force act

    vertically upwards.

    Figure 2.10 (b)

    Figure 2.10 (a)

    From NSL

    F = ma

    mx = - c x kx

    50

    xm

    k

    c

    x

    k x (Spring Force)

    c x (damping Force).

    .

    mx + c x + kx = 0.. .

    .. ..

    ..

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    51/58

    Illustration 5: A variation of the previous system is shown in figure 2.11 (a) where a

    provision is made for input displacement x at the top of spring. Figure 2.11 (b) shows the

    free body diagram of the mass responding to a positive input at x. It is assumed that x is

    displaced upward and that the mass is responding with a positive displacement y (less

    than x) and with a positive velocity. With this assumption the spring force acts upward

    with a magnitude k (x-y) and the damping force is acts downwards as shown in the free

    body diagram.

    Figure 2.11 (b)

    Figure 2.11 (a)

    --- GDE

    51

    m

    X (Input)

    y (Response)

    m

    k (x-y)

    c y.

    m

    kx

    c y.

    ky

    From NSLmy = + k (x-y) - c y.. .

    my + c y + ky = kx.. .

    c

    k

    x > y

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    52/58

    2.3.3 Models for Rotational or Torsional Systems: The principles presented previously

    can be extended to obtain the mathematical model for torsional or rotational systems.

    Illustration 6: Consider a system with rotating inertia J with torsional spring of stiffness

    kt and a rotary damper with damping coefficient b as shown in figure 2.12 (a). If J is

    displaced by the corresponding free body diagram is as shown in figure 2.12 (b).

    Figure 2.12 (a) Figure 2.12 (b)

    From NSL for rotating system

    = TJ

    bkJ t =

    0=++ tkbJ

    Illustration 7: A variation of the previous system is shown in figure 2.13 (a) where a

    provision is made for input displacement i at the end of torsional spring. Figure 2.13

    (b) shows the free body diagram of the inertia responding to a positive input i. It is

    assumed that i is displaced clockwise (looking from left) and that the inertia is

    responding with a clockwise displacement 0 (less than i) and a positive velocity.

    kt

    bJ

    Jkt. b.

    52

    .. .

    .. .

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    53/58

    With this assumption the spring torque is acting clockwise with a magnitude kt ( i - 0)

    and the damping torque is acting counter clockwise as shown in the free body diagram.

    Figure 2.13 (a)

    Figure 2.13 (b)

    Let i: Input

    And 0: ResponseLet (i > 0)

    From NSL for rotating system

    = TJ

    Illustration 8: A torsional system with torque T as input and angular displacement as

    output.

    kt

    bJ

    0

    i

    J bKti

    Kt(

    i-

    0) J

    b

    kt

    0

    .

    .

    53

    J0 = kt (i - 0) - b

    J 0 + b0 + kt0 = kt i --- Model

    .. .

    .. . .

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    54/58

    Figure 2.14 (a)

    Figure 2.14 (b)

    From NSL for rotating system

    = TJ

    J = T - b

    J + b = T --- Model

    2.3.4 System with more than one mass: System involving more than one mass is

    discussed below.

    Illustration 9: For a two DOF spring mass damper system obtain the mathematical

    model where F is the input x1 and x2 are responses.

    b

    T

    J

    b

    T

    .J

    54

    .. .

    .. .

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    55/58

    Figure 2.15 (a)

    Figure 2.15 (b)

    From NSL F= ma

    For mass m1

    m1x1 = F - b1 (x1-x2) - k1 (x1-x2) --- (a)

    For mass m2

    m2 x2 = b1 (x2-x1) + k1 (x2-x1) - b2 x2 - k2 x2 --- (b)

    m2

    m1

    k2

    b2

    (Damper)

    x2 (Response)

    x1

    (Response)

    k1

    F

    b1

    m2

    m1

    F

    k2

    x2

    b2

    x2

    k1

    x2

    k1

    x1

    b1

    x1

    b1

    x2

    x2

    k1

    x2

    k1

    x1

    b1

    x1 b1 x2

    .

    . .

    .

    m2

    m1

    F

    k2

    x2

    b2

    x2

    k1

    (x1-x

    2)

    .

    .b

    1(x

    1-x

    2)

    .

    x1

    .

    55

    .. . .

    .. . . .

    Draw the free body diagram for mass m1and m2 separately as shown in figure 2.15

    (b)

    Apply NSL for both the masses separatelyand get equations as given in (a) and (b)

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    56/58

    Illustration 10: For the system shown in figure 2.16 (a) obtain the mathematical model if

    x1 and x2 are initial displacements.

    Let an initial displacement x1 be given to mass m1 and x2 to mass m2.

    Figure 2.16 (a)

    K1

    K2

    K3

    m2

    m1

    X1

    X2

    56

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    57/58

    Figure 2.16 (b)

    Based on Newtons second law of motion: F = maFor mass m1

    m1x1 = - K1x1 + K2 (x2-x1)

    m1x1 + K1x1 K2 x2 + K2x1 = 0

    m1x1 + x1 (K1 + K2) = K2x2 ----- (1)

    For mass m2

    m2x2 = - K3x2 K2 (x2 x1)

    m2x2 + K3 x2 + K2 x2 K2 x1

    m2 x2 + x2 (K2 + K3) = K2x1 ----- (2)

    Mathematical models are:

    m1x1 + x1 (K1 + K2) = K2x2 ----- (1)

    K1

    X1

    K2

    X2

    K2

    X2

    K2

    X1

    K2

    X1

    K3

    X2 K

    3X

    2

    K1

    X1

    X1 X

    1

    m1

    m1

    m2 m

    2X

    2 X2

    K2

    (X2

    X1)

    K2

    (X2

    X1)

    57

    ..

    ..

    ..

    ..

    ..

    ..

    ..

    ..

  • 7/30/2019 33525999 Control Engg Notes

    58/58

    m2x2 + x2 (K2 + K3) = K2x1 ----- (2)

    CONTINUED IN SESSION V: 05.09.2006

    ******************END****************