Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
334
Florida Entomologist
80(3) September, 1997
FEEDING RECORDS OF COSTA RICAN LEAF BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE)
R. W
ILLS
F
LOWERS
1
AND
D
ANIEL
H. J
ANZEN
2
1
Agricultural Research Programs, Florida A&M UniversityTallahassee, FL 32307-4100, [email protected]
2
Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA [email protected]
A
BSTRACT
Host plant associations are given for 137 species representing 7 subfamilies and92 genera of Costa Rican Chrysomelidae. A numeric score is introduced to objectivelydescribe confidence that a field observation of an interaction between a chrysomelidand a plant represents true herbivory. Literature host plant records, if they exist, aregiven for included chrysomelid taxa.
Key Words: herbivory, Criocerinae, Chrysomelinae, Cryptocephalinae, Eumolpinae,Galerucinae, Hispinae, Lamprosominae, host plants
R
ESUMEN
Se presentan asociaciones de plantas hospederas para 137 especies de Chrysome-lidae de Costa Rica, representando 7 subfamilias y 92 géneros de escarabajos. Se in-troduce una calificación numérica para describir objetivamente la confianza en queuna observación de campo de una interacción entre un escarabajo y una planta repre-senta un caso verdadero de herbivoría. Se presentan datos de plantas hospederas de
la literatura, si existen, para los taxa de escarabajos incluidos.
In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in relationships between tropi-cal plants and insects. The interest is driven by the related agendas of studying themfor their intrinsic scientific interest, and protecting tropical biodiversity through find-ing practical and non-destructive ways to use it. The latter agenda is exemplified bythe biochemical prospecting programs recently started in several areas of the world(Reid et al. 1993).
Most plant-insect research begins with a basic event: an observation that a specificplant is somehow important in the life cycle of a specific insect. Unfortunately, huge
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records
335
sections of the tropical insect fauna are still unusable as subjects of insect-plant re-search because that first step of linking plant and insect taxa has been largely ne-glected. In-depth studies of plant-insect interactions have focused on temperate zoneinsects and on a few relatively well known tropical groups (e.g., Lepidoptera). Only asmall percentage of the fauna of tropical herbivores has been similarly studied.
The family Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera), or leaf beetles, is a natural subject forstudying plant-insect and inter-herbivore interactions (Strauss 1988). Of the esti-mated 37,000 species, world-wide, in this family, almost all, as far as we know, areherbivores or seed predators. However, for about 70% of the described species, we donot have records of host plants. Most of the known host plant records are Holarctic(Jolivet 1988b). For Neotropical Chrysomelidae other than Bruchinae, the most spe-cific information treats economically important species (e.g., King & Saunders 1984,Ostmark 1975, Jolivet 1979, Hilje et al. 1991). However, a review of known host plantsof the tortoise beetles (Cassidinae) of Panama was recently published by Windsor etal. (1992); Moldenke (1971) listed host plants for some Mexican Chrysomelidae, andAnaya (1989) reviewed the known host plants of North and Central American Chry-somelinae. Jolivet, in a series of papers (1977, 1978, 1982, 1987a, 1987b, 1988a, 1991;Jolivet et al. 1986) and in a recent book (Jolivet & Hawkeswood 1995) summarizedcurrent host plant data on a world level for the Chrysomelidae. However, in much ofthis literature, beetle species are usually identified only to genus and their plant hostsonly to family. A few field studies have documented significant attacks by chry-somelids on plants in Central American ecosystems (e.g., Rockwood 1974, Memmottet al. 1993), and some detailed field and laboratory studies have been undertaken forseveral Neotropical species (Bach 1986, Begossi & Benson 1988, Buzzi & Winder1986, Hsiao 1988, Strong 1977a,b). Apart from these ecological studies of specificchrysomelids, many of the published host plant records are of dubious value, statingmerely that beetle X was taken on plant Y (or, all too often, “genus X feeds on plantgenus Y”). A further problem, also noted by Furth (1985), is that a large proportion ofsuch records are buried in taxonomic monographs and regional studies (e.g., Bechyné& Bechyné 1975) and accessible only by reading these studies in their entirety. Muchmore data on a much broader spectrum of chrysomelid taxa will have to be accumu-lated and made available before any credible generalizations about the nature of leafbeetle-plant interactions can be made.
In this paper, we present feeding records of adults and larvae for 137 species ofCosta Rican Chrysomelidae, representing 7 subfamilies and 92 genera. The majorityof these observations were made by the senior author during a six-month sabbaticalat Costa Rica’s Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBio) in 1991, and by the juniorauthor during the years 1978 to 1995 as a byproduct of an on-going intensive study ofthe caterpillars of the dry forests of Sector Santa Rosa of the Guanacaste Conserva-tion Area (Janzen 1993, Janzen & Gauld 1996). Our records include results from di-rect observations of free-living feeding, feeding tests, and field associations. We haveomitted many records where a single beetle was seen or collected on a plant, except fora few cases where the beetle was seen actively feeding.
Beetles were identified by the senior author (Criocerinae, Cryptocephalinae, Lam-prosominae, Eumolpinae) and the following specialists: Catherine N. Duckett (Uni-versity of Puerto Rico, Alticini), Vilma Savini P. (Universidad Central de Venezuela,Alticini), David G. Furth (U.S. Natural History Museum, Alticini), Shawn M. Clark(West Virginia Department of Agriculture, Galerucini), Charles L. Staines (MarylandDepartment of Plant Protection, Hispini), and Edward G. Riley (Texas A&M Univer-sity, Cassidini). Plants were identified by the authors and Quirico Jiménez (INBio),Nelson Zamora (INBio), and Pablo Sanchez (Museo Nacional de Costa Rica).
336
Florida Entomologist
80(3) September, 1997
Our data are organized into a table with three supplementary appendices. Table 1lists observations by chrysomelid taxon, gives field data in summary form, and listsvoucher specimens. Appendix 1 is a key to plant family name abbreviations. Appendix2 gives the full localities for locality codes used in Table 1. Appendix 3 gives miscella-neous field observations, as well as relevant literature citations for many of the chry-somelid taxa. In Table 1 we have followed the higher classification of Reid (1995)which reduces several well-known subfamilies to tribal status and confirms earlieropinions (eg. Crowson 1955, Lawrence 1982) that Bruchidae, or seed weevils, are asubfamily of Chrysomelidae. Bruchinae are not included in this report; for informa-tion on their host associations, see Janzen (1980a), Johnson (1990), and literature ci-tations therein. While not all workers fully agree with all aspects of Reid’sclassification, it represents the latest and most comprehensive phylogenetic arrange-ment of the Chrysomelidae. For differing views, see Kingsolver (1995), Verma & Sax-ena (1996), and Reid (1996).
Explanation of Table 1Leaf Beetle
Scientific names follow Wilcox (1983) and Flowers (1996). In a few cases, approxi-mate species identifications are indicated by “nr.” before the species name: e.g.,
Pla-giodera
nr.
uniformis
. In some cases only generic identifications were possible, anddistinct morphospecies are numbered as such.
Plant
Names follow current usage in the Costa Rica National Herbarium and in the bot-any department at INBio. In cases where species identification is approximate, theterm “cf.” is used (e.g.,
Solanum
cf.
torvum
).
Plant Family
Classification follows the listings of the
Flora of Costa Rica
by the Missouri Botan-ical Garden and INBio, viewable on the World Wide Web at
http://cissus.mobot.org/manual.plantas/lista.html
. Families are coded by initial letters of their familynames. See Appendix 1 for full listing.
Stage
A, adult; L, larva; P, pupa
Locality
See Appendix 2 for full locality data.
Date
Date of initial collection is given in cases where beetles were reared from larvae orheld for testing.
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records
337
Collectors
DHJ&WH: Daniel H. Janzen & Winnie HallwachsRWF: R. W. FlowersNames of other collectors are given as they appear on voucher data labels.
Score
This is an attempt to objectively communicate our level of confidence that an ob-served association involved actual feeding by the chrysomelid. 6 Chrysomelids were observed in the field actually eating plant material.5 Chrysomelids fed on plant when confined.4 10 or more chrysomelids were collected from a plant and feeding damage that
could reasonably be attributed to the beetles was present.3 Five to nine chrysomelids were collected from a plant and feeding damage that
could reasonably be attributed to the beetles was present,
or
10 or more chry-somelids were collected from a plant but obvious feeding damage attributable tothe beetles was not present.
2 Two to four chrysomelids were collected from a plant and feeding damage thatcould reasonably be attributed to the beetles was present,
or
five to nine chry-somelids were collected from a plant but obvious feeding damage attributable tothe beetles was not present.
1 Two to four chrysomelids were collected from a plant but no noticeable feedingdamage was observed.
Number (No.)
Number of vouchered specimens. In general, one feeding record equals onevoucher; the few exceptions are mentioned in the Note column.
Voucher
Specimens collected by the senior author have voucher codes in the form “(Collec-tion No.)-RWF(Year)” and are deposited in INBio. Those collected by the junior authorhave codes in the form “(Year)-SRNP-(Number)” and are nominally specimens of IN-Bio but are on temporary loan to the University of Pennsylvania.
Note
These are numbered consecutively and appear in Appendix 3.
Appendix 2. Localities
Localities cited in Table 1 are listed on an approximate north-south gradient. Thefirst letter of each locality code corresponds to the first letter of its province. Localitiesin the Area de Conservación Guanacaste also include Lambert Coordinates in paren-theses. Lambert Coordinates are used in Costa Rica in preference to latitude-longi-tude because the 1:50,000 topo sheets are gridded with Lambert Coordinates and,being metric, Lambert positions are easier to use.
338
Florida Entomologist
80(3) September, 1997
D
ISCUSSION
The data presented in these tables represent only the beginnings of the task ofworking out host plant relationships for the Central American Chrysomelidae. Ourdata cover less than 7% of the estimated 2000 chrysomelid species present in CostaRica alone (Flowers, unpublished data). In some cases, our data confirmed previouslypublished relationships between chrysomelid genera and host plant families (summa-rized in Jolivet & Hawkeswood 1995); 30 of our records represent host plant familyrange extensions, and 19 records are for chrysomelid genera in which, apparently, nohost plants have been recorded previously.
Most previously published host plant studies for the Neotropical Chrysomelidae(aside from focused studies on specific taxonomic groups, (e.g., Bach 1986; Begossi &Benson 1988; Windsor 1986) make no distinctions between accidental or casual asso-ciations of plant and beetle and true host relationships. The dangers in not makingthese distinctions have been demonstrated to us on several occasions when we foundchrysomelid species that move off their food plants for resting or defecating. An exam-ple is
Omophoeta simulans
(Alticini, see Table 1), a group of which was first observedsitting on leaves of a
Luehea
sapling (Tiliaceae). Although large numbers of beetleswere on the
Luehea
, and their frass was also evident on these leaves, closer inspectionrevealed that no feeding was taking place on the
Luehea
and that the true food plant(
Evolvulus nummularis
; Convolvulaceae) was growing beneath the shrub. Similarwarnings about possible confusion of Alticini food plants due to the beetle’s mobilityhave been given by Hawkeswood and Furth (1994). Nevertheless, collection recordscan still provide useful information—for many taxa opportunistic collecting has pro-vided the only information we have on possible host plants—if their limitations areclearly acknowledged. For our data we have included a “reliability scale” to roughlymeasure our confidence that a given association represents a true chrysomelid-hostplant relationship. While ecological studies of narrow groups of chrysomelids orplants will always provide the most unambiguous data on feeding requirements, re-cent emphasis on and support for inventory collecting can rapidly increase knowledgeof the feeding habits of a broad range of chrysomelids, if observations are qualified insome manner.
We intend to continue expanding on the present work, and we encourage other col-lectors of Chrysomelidae to record, categorize and publish the plant associations theyobserve. Rapidly expanding our knowledge of chrysomelid-plant interactions is im-portant for two reasons. On the practical side, knowing host plants for more chry-somelid species will facilitate programs in chemical prospecting which are currentlyfocused on plants. When a family of plants is being surveyed for active chemicals, theinsects feeding on those plants represent another level of chemical derivatives avail-able for screening. The phytophagous insect may produce novel chemical varietieswhich cannot be synthesized directly from the host plant.
A second area where more host plant data are needed is in the testing of hypothe-ses of the evolution of host plant selection. At present there are two competing theo-ries of what chiefly influences this evolution: phylogenetic and ecological mediation.Phylogenetic mediation (cospeciation) postulates that most cases of herbivory arisefrom cospeciation or parallel descent. This theory has become a popular explanationof host plant selection, under the name “coevolution” (though we caution the readerthat this is not the original meaning of the word, see Janzen 1980b). Phylogenetic me-diation has been demonstrated in the Chrysomelidae for
Phyllobrotica
species (Gal-erucinae) and their hosts in the Lamiales (Farrell and Mitter 1990). However, theirstudy represents one of the few documented examples of coevolution (Anderson 1993).
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records
339
T
AB
LE
1.
F
EE
DIN
G
RE
CO
RD
S
OF
C
OS
TA
R
ICA
N
LE
AF
BE
ET
LE
S
. S
EE
TE
XT
FO
R
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF
CO
LU
MN
S
.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
CR
IOC
ER
INA
E
Lem
a
nr.
atri
corn
is
C
hev
.
Dio
scor
ea
con
volv
ula
ceae
S
chlt
dl. &
Ch
am.
DIO
A,L
G11
3/V
II/1
983
DH
J&W
H3
1083
-SR
NP
-707
1
Lem
a
suba
pica
lis
(B
aly)
Dio
scor
ea
sp.
DIO
AG
220
/VII
I/19
91R
WF,
R. E
li-
zon
do1
380
-RW
F91
Lem
a
sp.
Dio
scor
ea
sp.
DIO
AG
228
/V/1
991
RW
F, R
. Eli
-zo
ndo
, L. R
ose
14
116-
RW
F91
Met
opoc
eris
ge
mm
ans
(Ja
c.)
Sol
anu
m a
rgen
tiu
m
D
uva
l ex.
Poi
ret
SO
LA
G23
15/V
III/
1991
RW
F,C
. Ch
avez
62
50-R
WF
912
CR
YP
TO
CE
PH
AL
INA
E s
.s.
Gri
buri
us a
lbil
abri
s
S
uff
rian
Sem
iala
riu
m
mex
ican
um
(M
iers
) M
enn
ega
HIP
AG
1025
/V/1
991
RW
F5
322
-RW
F91
3
CR
YP
TO
CE
PH
AL
INA
E: C
HL
AM
ISIN
I
Ch
lam
isiu
s in
sign
is
Jac.
B
yrso
nim
a cr
assi
foli
a
(L
.) K
un
thM
LP
AG
1425
/VI/
1980
DH
J&W
H6
180
-SR
NP
-239
4
Pse
ud
och
lam
ys
nr.
meg
alos
tom
oid
es
L
ac.
Wal
ther
ia i
nd
ica
L.
ST
EA
G7
25/I
I/19
90R
WF
63
9-R
WF
945
340
Florida Entomologist
80(3) September, 1997
CR
YP
TO
CE
PH
AL
INA
E: C
LYT
RIN
I
Bab
ia p
arvu
la
Jac
.
Th
ouin
idiu
m
dic
and
rum
(Hu
mb.
&B
onpl
.)
Rad
lk.
SP
IA
G19
12/V
/199
1R
WF
611
67-R
WF
916
LA
MP
RO
SO
MIN
AE
Lam
pros
oma
sp.
Byr
son
ima
cras
sifo
lia
ML
PA
G7
15/V
/197
8D
HJ&
WH
62
78-S
RN
P-3
.17
Oom
orph
us
god
man
i
Jac
.
Coc
hlo
sper
mu
m
viti
foli
um
(W
illd
.)
Spr
eng
CO
CA
G2
20/V
III/
1991
RW
F, R
. E
lizo
ndo
613
74-R
WF
918
EU
MO
LP
INA
E
An
tity
pon
a
sp.
Gli
rici
dia
sep
ium
(J
acq.
)F
AB
AG
1729
/V/1
991
RW
F2
610
5-R
WF
919
Ch
alco
phan
a d
is-
colo
r
Jac
.
Pip
er a
uri
tum
Ku
nth
PIP
AG
2315
/VII
I/19
91R
WF,
C.
Ch
avez
26
81-R
WF
9110
Pip
er
sp.
PIP
AG
117
/V/1
991
RW
F1
273
-RW
F91
Ch
alco
phan
a m
uta
-bi
lis
Har
.
Eu
pato
riu
m a
lbic
aule
D
HJ
AS
TA
G8
05/V
II/1
982
DH
J&W
H1
282
-SR
NP
-471
Ch
alco
phan
a
nr.
ci
nct
a
Har
.
Ver
non
ia
sp.
AS
TA
G1
18/V
/199
1R
WF
14
16-R
WF
91
T
AB
LE
1.
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D
) F
EE
DIN
G
RE
CO
RD
S
OF
C
OS
TA
R
ICA
N
LE
AF
BE
ET
LE
S
. S
EE
TE
XT
FO
R
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF
CO
LU
MN
S
.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records
341
Cri
ton
ia
cf.
mor
iflor
a
(M
ille
r) R
. M. K
ing
&
H. R
ob.
AS
TA
C1
5/IX
/199
1R
WF,
D. C
oto,
J.
Sau
nde
rs1
248
-RW
F91
Col
aspi
s
nr.
hy-
poch
lora
Lef
.u
nid
ent.
sp.
ML
PA
G5
11/V
I/19
91R
WF
62
101-
RW
F91
Cis
sus
rhom
bifo
lia
V
ahl.
VIT
AG
1412
/VI/
1989
DH
J&W
H6
189
-SR
NP
-182
Col
aspi
s im
pres
sa
L
ef.
Cis
sus
pseu
dos
icy-
oid
es
Cro
atV
ITA
G19
12/V
I/19
91R
WF,
R. T
iffe
r4
496
-RW
F91
Cis
sus
pseu
dos
icy-
oid
es
VIT
AG
1412
/VI/
1980
DH
J&W
H4
180
-SR
NP
-107
Cis
sus
rhom
bifo
lia
VIT
AG
1005
/VII
/198
0D
HJ&
WH
61
80-S
RN
P-3
31
Col
aspi
s in
con
-st
ans
Lef
.
Sal
mea
sca
nd
ens
(L
.)
DC
.A
ST
AP
314
/V/1
995
RW
F4
136-
RW
F95
Col
aspi
s m
elan
chol
-ic
a
Jac
.
Sar
cost
emm
a bi
-lo
bum
Hoo
k.&
Arn
.A
SC
AG
1422
/VI/
1980
DH
J&W
H6
180
-SR
NP
-190
Ble
phar
odon
mu
cr-
onat
um
(Sch
ltdl
.)
Dec
ne
AS
CA
G22
02/V
II/1
991
DH
J&W
H6
591
-SR
NP
-135
1
Col
aspo
ides
un
i-co
lor
Jac
.
Ard
isia
sp.
MY
RA
G1
18/V
/199
1R
WF
51
27-R
WF
9111
Deu
tero
nod
a su
tur-
alis
(L
ef.)
Cas
sia
bifl
ora
L.
CA
EA
G17
29/V
/199
1R
WF
25
103-
RW
F91
Cas
sia
reti
cula
ta
W
illd
.C
AE
AH
122
/I/1
989
RW
F6
522
-RW
F94
T
AB
LE
1.
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D
) F
EE
DIN
G
RE
CO
RD
S
OF
C
OS
TA
R
ICA
N
LE
AF
BE
ET
LE
S
. S
EE
TE
XT
FO
R
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF
CO
LU
MN
S
.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
342
Florida Entomologist
80(3) September, 1997
Eu
mol
pus
robu
stu
s
Hor
n
Gon
olob
us
sp.
AS
CA
G23
17/V
III/
1991
C. C
hav
ez,
RW
F6
263
-RW
F91
Sar
cost
emm
a bi
lobu
m
AS
CA
G14
22/V
I/19
80
2/V
II/1
980
DH
J&W
H6
1 180
-SR
NP
-191
80
-SR
NP
-290
Sar
cost
emm
a gl
au-
cum
H.B
.K.
AS
CA
G10
30/V
/198
1D
HJ&
WH
62
81-S
RN
P-4
9
Meg
asce
lis
sp.
Sw
artz
ia c
ube
nsi
s
(B
ritt
.&W
ils.
) S
tan
dl.
CA
EA
G11
23/V
I/19
89D
HJ&
WH
64
89-S
RN
P-2
8812
Met
ach
rom
a n
r. cl
arke
i B
lake
Avi
cen
nia
ger
min
ans
(L.)
L.
VE
RA
G21
20/V
/199
1R
WF
25
111-
RW
F91
Con
ocar
pus
erec
ta L
.C
OM
AG
2120
/V/1
991
RW
F1
311
2-R
WF
91P
erco
lasp
is n
r. h
y-po
xan
tha
(Lef
.)C
occo
loba
lip
orti
zii
Góm
ez-L
aur.
&N
. Z
amor
a
PO
LA
A2
8/II
I/19
90R
WF
35
20-R
WF
9413
Per
cola
spis
scu
lpta
(J
ac.)
Pit
hec
ello
biu
m l
ongi
-fo
liu
m (
Hu
mb.
&
Bon
pl.)
Sta
ndl
.
MIM
AG
2917
/II/
1989
RW
F, M
. G
onza
lez,
T.
Agu
ilar
64
19-R
WF
94
Pit
hec
ello
biu
m l
ongi
-fo
liu
mM
IMA
418
/II/
1994
RW
F, Y
. As-
torg
a, J
. Sol
is6
515
-RW
F94
Inga
ver
a W
illd
.M
IMA
G8
22/I
V/1
983
DH
J&W
H6
183
-SR
NP
-104
Ph
anae
ta r
ufi
coll
is
Lef
.G
onza
lagu
nia
br
acte
osa
(Don
n.
Sm
ith
) R
obin
son
RU
BA
G1
15/V
/199
1R
WF
35
15-R
WF
9114
Lad
enbe
rgia
se
rico
phyl
la S
tan
dley
RU
BA
G1
15/V
/199
1R
WF
24
8-R
WF
91
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 343
Sab
acea
vil
losa
Roe
m.
& S
chu
lt.
RU
BA
H1
22/I
/198
9R
WF
411
21-R
WF
94
Ph
anae
ta s
p. 1
Ron
del
etia
bu
dd
le-
oid
es B
enth
.R
UB
AG
48/
V/1
991
RW
F3
517
-RW
F91
Ph
anae
ta s
p. 2
Som
mer
a d
onn
ell-
smit
hii
Sta
ndl
.R
UB
AC
15/
IX/1
991
RW
F, D
. Cot
o,
J. S
aun
ders
13
43-R
WF
91
Rh
abd
opte
rus
sp. 1
Oco
tea
vera
guen
sis
(Mei
ssn
.) M
ez.
LA
UA
G8
2/V
II/1
982
DH
J&W
H6
1082
-SR
NP
-426
15
Rh
abd
opte
rus
sp 2
&
3M
anil
kara
ch
icle
(L
.)
van
Roy
anS
PO
AG
1031
/VII
/198
3D
HJ&
WH
64
83-S
RN
P-9
08
Typ
oph
oru
s va
ri-
abil
is J
ac.
un
iden
t. s
p.M
EL
AC
25/
II/1
994
RW
F, M
. Ch
a-va
rría
, H.
Wei
ler
413
3-R
WF
9416
Typ
oph
oru
s sp
. 1C
onos
tygi
a xa
lape
nsi
s (B
onpl
.) D
.Don
ME
LA
G1
12/V
/199
1R
WF
24
5-R
WF
91
Typ
oph
oru
s sp
. 3Ip
omoe
a pe
s-ca
pra
(L.)
R
. Br.
CN
VA
G20
12/V
/199
1R
WF,
R. T
iffe
r2
365
-RW
F91
CH
RY
SO
ME
LIN
AE
Cal
ligr
aph
a ar
gus
Stå
lG
uaz
um
a u
lmif
olia
L
am.
ST
EA
G10
25/V
/199
1R
WF
62
113-
RW
F91
Gu
azu
ma
ulm
ifol
iaS
TE
L, A
G14
16/V
/197
927
/VI/
1980
DH
J&W
H6 6
1 179
-SR
NP
-14
80-S
RN
P-2
51
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
344 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
Byt
tner
ia a
cule
ata
(Jac
q.)
Jacq
.S
TE
AG
1130
/V/1
981
DH
J&W
H6
281
-SR
NP
-50
Cal
ligr
aph
a fu
lvi-
pes
Stå
lS
ida
rhom
bifo
lia
L.
MLV
AS
224
/VI/
1991
RW
F, J
. Cor
-ra
les,
A. S
olís
68
89-R
WF
91
Cal
ligr
aph
a se
rpen
-ti
na
(Rog
ers)
Aye
nia
mic
ran
tha
Sta
ndl
.S
TE
L, A
G9
2/V
II/1
983
DH
J&W
H6
683
-SR
NP
-691
Lep
tin
otar
sa u
nd
ec-
imli
nea
ta S
tål
Sol
anu
m o
chra
ceof
er-
rugi
neu
m (D
un
.) F
ern
.S
OL
L, A
G1
16/V
/199
1R
WF
61
16-R
WF
9417
Pla
giod
era
cere
a at
rita
rsis
Stå
lP
rock
ia c
ruci
s L
.F
LA
P, A
G10
6/V
I/19
8014
/VI/
198
DH
J&W
H6 6
2 780
-SR
NP
-69
82-S
RN
P-2
2518
Pro
ckia
cru
cis
FL
AL
, AG
92/
VII
/198
3D
HJ&
WH
61
83-S
RN
P-6
98P
rock
ia c
ruci
sF
LA
L, A
G26
20/V
I/19
80D
HJ&
WH
61
80-S
RN
P-1
65P
lagi
oder
a n
r. u
ni-
form
is J
ac.
Xyl
osom
a fl
exu
osu
m
(HB
K)
Hem
sley
FL
AL
, AG
1515
/VI/
1983
DH
J&W
H6
983
-SR
NP
-428
Pla
giod
era
sp.
Xyl
osom
a h
orri
da
Ros
eF
LA
L, A
G15
30/V
/199
1D
HJ&
WH
612
91-S
RN
P-5
38
Pla
typh
ora
bico
lor
Jac.
Koa
nop
hyl
lon
pit
tier
i (K
latt
) R
. M. &
H.
Rob
inso
n
AS
TA
G23
16/V
III/
1991
RW
F6
541
-RW
F91
19
Pla
typh
ora
petu
-la
ns
Stå
lM
esec
hit
es t
rifi
da
(Jac
q.)
Mü
ll. A
rg.
AP
OA
G8
24/V
I/19
83D
HJ&
WH
61
83-S
RN
P-5
64
Pre
ston
ia a
llen
ii
Woo
dson
AP
OA
G8
9/V
II/1
982
3/X
II/1
983
13/X
II/1
983
DH
J&W
H6
1 1 1
82-S
RN
P-5
3383
-SR
NP
-139
883
-SR
NP
-145
3
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 345
Pre
ston
ia a
llen
iiA
PO
AG
107/
VII
/198
9D
HJ&
WH
12
89-S
RN
P-5
60S
tilo
des
mod
esta
Ja
c.B
anis
teri
opsi
s m
uri
-ca
ta (
Cav
.) C
uat
r.M
LP
L, A
G7
20/V
I/19
78D
HJ&
WH
63
78-S
RN
P-8
320
Ban
iste
riop
sis
mu
ri-
cata
ML
PL
, AG
142/
VII
/198
0D
HJ&
WH
62
80-S
RN
P-2
92
Ban
iste
riop
sis
mu
ri-
cata
ML
PL
, AG
412
/V/1
991
RW
F6
531
-RW
F91
Sti
lod
es n
epti
s S
tål
Hir
aea
recl
inat
a Ja
cq.
ML
PA
G8
14/V
I/19
84D
HJ&
WH
62
84-S
RN
P-5
57H
irae
a re
clin
ata
ML
PA
G27
4/V
II/1
983
DH
J&W
H6
383
-SR
NP
-732
Hir
aea
recl
inat
aM
LP
L, A
G11
16/V
I/19
89D
HJ&
WH
618
89-S
RN
P-2
1321
Hir
aea
recl
inat
aM
LP
AG
1716
/VI/
1991
RW
F6
111
5-R
WF
9122
GA
LE
RU
CIN
AE
: s.s
.
Bib
lite
a ja
nso
ni
(Jac
.)W
ith
erin
gia
sp.
SO
LA
G23
20/I
II/1
990
RW
F3
1017
-RW
F94
Car
agu
ata
pall
ida
(Jac
.)V
ism
ia b
acci
fera
(L
.)
Tr.
& P
l.C
LU
L, A
G1
17/V
I/19
91R
WF
619
40-R
WF
9123
Coe
lom
era
sp.
Cec
ropi
a pe
ltat
a L
.C
EC
AG
1031
/VII
/198
3D
HJ&
WH
62
83-S
RN
P-9
03Is
otes
sp.
Ires
ine
dif
fusa
Ku
nth
.A
MA
AA
123
/V/1
991
RW
F4
919
-RW
F91
24L
upe
roso
ma
vitt
atu
m J
ac.
Lon
choc
arpu
s ac
um
inat
us
(Sch
ech
t.)
Sou
sa
FA
BA
G19
12/V
I/19
91R
WF
36
97-R
WF
9125
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
346 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
Mal
acor
hin
us
dec
empu
nct
atu
s Ja
c.
Pit
hec
ello
biu
m
palm
anu
m S
tan
dl.
MIM
AG
49/
V/1
991
RW
F6
21-
RW
F94
26
Pit
hic
ello
biu
m l
ongi
-fo
liu
mM
IMA
A4
18/I
I/19
94R
WF
62
4-R
WF
94
Mas
uri
us
spp.
Cro
ton
sp.
EU
PA
G23
15/V
III/
1991
RW
F4
1161
-RW
F91
27S
olan
um
ace
rosu
m
Sen
dt.
SO
LA
G23
16/V
III/
1991
RW
F4
1470
-RW
F91
Mon
olep
ta s
p.R
oure
a gl
abra
Ku
nth
.C
ON
AG
89/
VII
/198
2D
HJ&
WH
615
82-S
RN
P-5
12N
esti
nu
s vi
rid
is
Jac.
Zan
thox
ylu
m s
etu
lo-
sum
P. W
ilso
nR
UT
L L, A A
G14
13/V
I/19
8214
/VII
/198
319
/XII
/198
3
DH
J&W
H6
1 1 2
82-S
RN
P-2
2183
-SR
NP
-802
83-S
RN
P-1
479
28
Nes
tin
us
n. s
p.E
ssen
beck
ia l
itto
rali
s D
onn
. Sm
ith
RU
TL
, AG
1618
/VI/
1983
DH
J&W
H6
183
-SR
NP
-454
Par
anap
iaca
ba r
u-
fofa
scia
ta (
Jac.
)C
outa
rea
hex
and
ra
(Jac
q.)
RU
BA
G2
20/V
III/
1991
RW
F4
254
-RW
F91
29
Yin
gare
sca
sp.
Cor
dia
eri
osti
gma
Pit
tier
BO
RA
S1
14/I
I/19
90R
WF
625
18-R
WF
9430
GA
LE
RU
CIN
AE
: ALT
ICIN
I
Ala
goas
a se
riat
a (J
ac.)
Lan
tan
a ca
mar
a L
.V
ER
AG
1428
/VI/
1995
DH
J&W
H6
193
-SR
NP
-299
5
Asp
hae
ra
nob
ilit
ata
(Fab
r.)
Ipom
oea
sp.
CN
VA
P3
10/V
/199
5R
WF
61
7-R
WF
9531
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 347
Asp
hae
ra r
eich
ei
Har
.V
ern
onia
pat
ens
H.B
.K.
AS
TA
G1
16/V
/199
1R
WF
62
4-R
WF
9132
Aya
laia
min
or
Bec
h. &
Bec
h.
Byr
son
ima
cras
sifo
lia
ML
PA
G17
19/V
/199
1R
WF
61
76-R
WF
9133
Ban
iste
riop
sis
sp.
ML
PA
G2
28/V
/199
1R
WF,
R. E
li-
zon
do, L
. Ros
e1
488
-RW
F91
Aya
laia
sal
vad
or-
ense
Bec
h. &
Bec
h.
Ery
thro
xylu
m h
avan
-en
se J
acq.
ER
YA
G19
12/V
/199
1R
WF
614
68-R
WF
9134
Ery
thro
xylu
m h
avan
-en
seE
RY
AG
1112
/VII
I/19
91R
WF
66
84-R
WF
91
Ery
thro
xylu
m h
avan
-en
seE
RY
AG
923
/VI/
1992
DH
J&W
H6
892
-SR
NP
-242
4
Cen
tral
aph
thon
a n
r. le
ssm
ann
i B
ech
.&B
ech
.
Eu
phor
bia
elat
a B
ran
dE
UP
AG
2314
/VII
I/19
91R
WF,
C.
Ch
avez
628
72-R
WF
9135
Eu
phor
bia
elat
aE
UP
AG
234/
V/1
995
RW
F, E
. Ula
te6
198-
RW
F95
Ch
aeto
cnem
a sp
.P
avon
ia s
p.M
LVA
G1
17/V
/199
1R
WF
25
45-R
WF
91D
iph
alti
ca s
p. 1
Ces
tru
m r
acem
onsu
m
R.&
P.S
OL
AA
121
/V/1
991
RW
F3
437
-RW
F91
Dip
hal
tica
sp.
2S
olan
um
cf.
arbo
reu
m
Hu
mb.
& B
onpl
. ex
Du
val
SO
LA
C3
5/II
/199
4R
WF,
M. C
ha-
varr
ía, H
. W
eile
r
45
5-R
WF
94
Dip
hau
laca
au
lica
(O
l.)C
ours
etia
ell
ipti
ca M
. S
ousa
& R
udd
FA
BA
G11
12/V
III/
1991
RW
F4
1785
-RW
F91
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
348 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
Des
mod
ium
sp
FA
BA
G2
24/V
III/
1991
RW
F3
559
-RW
F91
Dis
onyc
ha
quin
que-
lin
eata
(L
at.)
Pas
sifl
ora
pulc
hel
la
Ku
nth
PA
SA
G9
27/V
II/1
992
DH
J&W
H6
892
-SR
NP
-402
6
Dis
onyc
ha
trif
asci
-at
a C
lark
Byt
tner
ia a
cule
ata
ST
EL
G9
21/X
I/19
87D
HJ&
WH
62
87-S
RN
P-1
343
36
Byt
tner
ia a
cule
ata
ST
EA
G11
11/V
III/
1995
DH
J&W
H6
195
-SR
NP
-784
8B
yttn
eria
acu
leat
aS
TE
AH
111
/I/1
995
RW
F6
121-
RW
F95
Epi
trix
sp.
1S
olan
um
cf.
torv
um
S
w.
SO
LA
A2
12/I
II/1
990
RW
F3
2611
-RW
F94
Epi
trix
sp.
2Q
uas
sia
amar
a L
.S
IMA
G2
6/V
/199
1R
WF,
T. d
e la
R
osa
28
18-R
WF
91
Gen
aph
thon
a tr
ans-
vers
icol
lis
(Jac
.)In
ga s
apin
dio
ides
W
illd
.M
IMA
A2
12/I
II/1
990
RW
F2
713
-RW
F94
Gio
ia s
p.P
alic
oure
a sa
lici
foli
a S
tan
dl.
RU
BA
C2
5/II
/199
4R
WF,
M. C
ha-
varr
ía, H
. W
eile
r
39
4 R
WF
94
Gle
nid
ion
nr.
haa
gi
Har
.In
ga s
apin
dio
ides
MIM
AA
212
/III
/199
0R
WF
12
12-R
WF
9437
Hei
kert
inge
rell
a sp
. 1
Bu
dd
leja
nit
ida
Ben
th.
LO
GA
C4
6/V
III/
1991
RW
F, L
. M. &
T.
A. K
etch
em4
2594
-RW
F91
Hei
kert
inge
rell
a sp
. 2
Lan
tan
a ca
mar
aV
ER
AP
215
/IX
/199
1R
WF,
R. A
gui-
lar
27
109-
RW
F91
38
Hyd
mos
yne
sp.
Bru
gman
sia
can
did
a P
ers.
SO
LA
A1
14/V
I/19
91R
WF
36
56-R
WF
9139
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 349
Lyc
ian
thes
mu
ltifl
ora
Bit
t.S
OL
AA
123
/V/1
991
RW
F3
638
-RW
F91
Wit
her
ingi
a sp
.S
OL
AP
314
/V/1
995
RW
F2
15-
RW
F95
Hyp
olam
psis
sp.
1C
appa
ris
fron
dos
a Ja
c.C
AP
AG
112
/V/1
991
RW
F1
228
-RW
F91
Lep
toph
ysa
nr.
bor-
don
i B
ech
. & B
ech
.C
leom
e pa
rvifl
ora
Ku
nth
CA
PA
G1
13/V
/199
1R
WF
425
95-R
WF
9140
Lep
toph
ysa
nr.
lit-
tora
lis
Bec
h. &
B
ech
.
Cap
pari
s od
orat
is-
sim
a Ja
cq.
CA
PA
G21
23/V
III/
1994
RW
F2
1126
-RW
F94
41
Lon
gita
rsu
s sp
. 1T
ourn
efor
tia
glab
ra L
.B
OR
AG
409
/V/1
991
RW
F2
611
-RW
F91
Lon
gita
rsu
s sp
. 2A
gera
tin
a sp
.A
ST
AC
46/
VII
I/19
91R
WF,
L. M
. &
T. A
. Ket
chem
26
92-R
WF
9142
Sen
ecio
an
dic
ola
Tu
rcz.
AS
TA
C4
6/V
III/
1991
RW
F, L
. M. &
T.
A. K
etch
em3
1293
-RW
F91
Lu
prae
a vi
olac
ea
Jac.
Urc
ra c
arac
asan
a (J
acq.
) G
rise
b.U
RT
AP
117
/II/
1990
RW
F4
1514
-RW
F94
Lu
prae
a n
r. vi
ola-
cea
Cli
bad
ium
sp.
AS
TA
A2
25/I
II/1
996
RW
F6
61-
RW
F96
Lu
prae
a sp
.H
yper
icu
m i
razu
ense
K
un
tze
CL
UA
C4
6/V
III/
1991
RW
F, L
. M. &
. T.
A. K
etch
em2
791
-RW
F91
Lys
ath
ia s
p.L
ud
wig
ia e
rect
a (
L.)
H
ara
ON
AA
G28
19/V
III/
1991
RW
F4
1552
-RW
F91
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
350 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
Lu
dw
igia
ere
cta
ON
AA
P2
15/I
X/1
991
RW
F, R
. A
guil
ar4
1711
0-R
WF
91
Mar
gari
dis
a sp
. 1C
onos
tegi
a xa
lape
nsi
sM
EL
AG
112
/V/1
991
RW
F3
255-
RW
F91
Mar
gari
dis
a sp
. 2M
icon
ia s
chli
mii
Tri
-an
aM
EL
AP
214
/IX
/199
1R
WF
24
107-
RW
F91
Mar
gari
dis
a sp
. 4W
ith
erin
gia
sp.
SO
LA
G1
14/V
/199
1R
WF
24
3-R
WF
91M
egis
tops
nr.
cost
a-ri
cen
sis
Bla
keT
abeb
uia
och
race
a (C
ham
.) S
tan
dl.
BIG
AG
1421
/VII
I/19
95D
HJ&
WH
63
95-S
RN
P-8
293
Tab
ebu
ia o
chra
cea
BIG
AG
1022
/VII
I/19
95D
HJ&
WH
65
95-S
RN
P-8
473
Mon
omac
ra v
iola
-ce
a (J
ac.)
Pas
sifl
ora
bifl
ora
Lam
.P
AS
AP
215
/IX
/199
1R
WF,
R. A
gui-
lar
12
108-
RW
F91
Nas
igon
a pa
llid
a Ja
c.G
onza
lagu
nia
ros
eaR
UB
AP
314
/V/1
995
RW
F4
24-
RW
F95
Not
ozon
a n
icar
a-gu
ensi
s Ja
c.B
urs
era
sim
aru
ba (L
.)
Sar
g.B
UR
AG
1618
/VI/
1983
DH
J&W
H6
183
-SR
NP
-455
43
Bu
rser
a si
mar
uba
BU
RL
, AG
1315
/VI/
1985
DH
J&W
H6
385
-SR
NP
-401
Om
oph
oeta
sim
u-
lan
s Ja
c.E
volv
ulu
s n
um
mu
-la
ris
(L.)
L.
CN
VA
G14
21/V
II/1
994
RW
F6
527
-RW
F94
44
Par
alac
tica
sp.
Pas
sifl
ora
sp.
PA
SA
G23
14/V
III/
1991
RW
F3
160
-RW
F91
Par
asyp
hra
ea s
p. 1
Inga
sp.
MIM
AG
117
/V/1
991
RW
F2
244
-RW
F91
Par
asyp
hra
ea s
p. 2
Cav
end
ish
ia b
ract
eata
(R
uis
& P
av. e
x J.
St.
-H
il.)
Hoe
rold
ER
IA
C3
5/II
/199
4R
WF,
M.
Ch
avar
ría,
H.
Wei
ler
410
6-R
WF
9445
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 351
Cav
end
ish
ia s
p.E
RI
AC
55/
II/1
994
RW
F, M
. C
hav
arrí
a, H
. W
eile
r
614
2-R
WF
94
Ph
enri
ca n
r. au
stri
-ac
a (S
chau
f.)B
yttn
eria
acu
leat
aS
TE
AG
1111
/VII
I/19
95D
HJ&
WH
62
95-S
RN
P-7
846
Pla
typr
osop
us
pal-
len
s (F
ab.)
Can
aval
ia b
rasi
len
sis
Mar
t. e
x B
ren
t.F
AB
AG
1318
/VI/
1991
RW
F4
739
-RW
F91
Ple
ctot
etra
nr.
clar
ki
Bal
yL
ippi
a to
rres
ii S
tan
dl.
VE
RA
A1
18/V
III/
1991
RW
F2
955
-RW
F91
Pto
cad
ica
nr.
stra
-m
inea
Har
.P
assi
flor
a sp
.P
AS
AG
2314
/VII
I/19
91R
WF
33
60-R
WF
91
Res
iste
nci
ana
ob-
scu
ra (
Jac.
)E
xost
ema
cari
baeu
m
(Jac
q.)
Roe
m &
Sch
ult
RU
BA
G2
24/V
III/
1991
RW
F1
253
-RW
F91
Res
iste
nci
ana
pan
a-m
ensi
s (J
ac.)
Xyl
osom
a sp
.F
LA
AG
2316
/VII
I/19
91R
WF
25
114-
RW
F91
Xyl
osom
a sp
.F
LA
AG
234/
V/1
995
RW
F, E
. Ula
te6
49-
RW
F95
Str
abal
a ac
um
inat
a co
star
icen
sis
Bla
keS
perm
acoc
e sp
.R
UB
AA
326
/VII
/199
4R
WF
51
24-R
WF
94
Syp
hre
a bi
bian
a B
ech
.M
imos
a pi
gra
L.
MIM
AG
1725
/V/1
991
RW
F4
3364
-RW
F91
46
Mim
osa
pigr
aM
IMA
G17
22/V
II/1
994
RW
F4
5223
-RW
F94
Syp
hre
a pa
rvu
la
Jac.
Ber
nar
dia
nic
ara-
guen
sis
Sta
ndl
.E
UP
AG
1112
/VII
I/19
91R
WF
62
83-R
WF
9147
Dal
ech
ampi
a sp
.E
UP
AG
821
/V/1
991
RW
F4
786
-RW
F91
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
352 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
Syp
hre
a sp
p.P
avon
ia s
p.M
LVA
G1
17/V
/199
1R
WF
12
45-R
WF
9148
Dal
ech
ampi
a h
eter
o-m
orph
a P
ax &
K.
Hof
fm.
EU
PA
G1
18/V
/199
1R
WF
26
25-R
WF
91
Cap
eron
ia p
alu
stri
s (L
.) A
. St.
-Hil
.E
UP
AG
3130
/I/1
994
RW
F3
161-
RW
F 9
4
Cap
eron
ia p
alu
stri
sE
UP
AG
2013
/VII
I/19
91R
WF,
R. T
iffe
r4
749
-RW
F91
Aca
lyph
a ap
odan
thes
S
tan
dl. &
L. O
.Wil
l-ia
ms
EU
PA
G4
10/V
/199
1R
WF
48
7-R
WF
91
Byt
tner
ia a
cule
ata
ST
EA
H1
11/I
/95
RW
F6
141-
RW
F95
Sys
ten
a su
lph
ure
a Ja
c.S
erja
nia
sch
ied
ean
a S
chlt
dl.
SP
IA
G11
5/V
II/1
980
DH
J&W
H6
180
-SR
NP
-340
49
Cas
sia
bifl
ora
CA
EA
G17
29/I
/198
9R
WF
12
10-R
WF
94W
alte
rian
ella
hu
-m
eral
is (
Fab.
)L
ind
enia
riv
alis
B
enth
.R
UB
AG
224
/VII
I/19
91R
WF,
R. E
li-
zon
do, L
. Ros
e2
487
-RW
F91
Wal
teri
anel
la t
enu
i-ci
nta
(Ja
c.)
un
iden
t sp
.A
CA
AG
220
/VII
I/19
91R
WF
24
51-R
WF
91
Wal
teri
anel
la v
e-n
ust
ula
(S
chau
f.)C
resc
enti
a al
ata
H.B
.K.
BIG
AG
1811
/VII
I/19
89D
HJ&
WH
66
89-S
RN
P-8
6350
Wal
teri
anel
la s
p.L
ind
enia
riv
alis
RU
BA
G2
28/V
/199
124
/VII
I/19
91R
WF,
R.
Eli
zon
do, L
. R
ose
311
87-R
WF
9151
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 353
HIS
PIN
AE
: s.s
.
Cep
hal
olei
a su
tura
lis
Bal
yC
ostu
s sp
.Z
INA
A1
14/V
I/19
91R
WF
41
79-R
WF
9152
Ch
alep
us
bell
ula
(C
hap
uis
)P
oace
aeP
OA
AG
3029
/I/1
994
RW
F4
267-
RW
F94
53
Car
inis
pa n
ever
-m
ann
i U
h.
Bu
nch
osia
sp.
ML
PL
G23
5/II
I/19
91D
HJ&
WH
61
91-S
RN
P-7
4
Mal
pigh
ia g
labr
a L
.M
LP
AA
518
/II/
1994
RW
F, Y
. As-
torg
a, J
. Sol
is4
148-
RW
F94
54
Dem
otis
pa s
tran
di
Uh
.S
perm
acoc
e sp
.R
UB
AA
326
/VII
/199
4R
WF
51
25-R
WF
94
Oxy
chal
epu
s al
ie-
nu
s (B
aly)
Cen
tros
ema
mac
roca
r-pu
m B
enth
.M
IMA
G9
24/V
/199
1R
WF
36
21-R
WF
91
Su
mit
rosi
s sp
.G
uaz
um
a u
lmif
olia
ST
EA
G2
6/V
/199
1R
WF
12
12&
13-R
WF
91U
ropl
ata
vari
cos-
tata
Pic
Byr
son
ima
cras
sifo
lia
ML
PA
G22
27/I
/199
2D
HJ&
WH
61
92-S
RN
P-2
94
Xen
och
alep
us
omog
era
(Cro
tch
)C
entr
osem
a m
acro
carp
um
FA
BL
G17
20/V
II/1
992
DH
J&W
H6
392
-SR
NP
-359
5
HIS
PIN
AE
: CA
SS
IDIN
I
Aka
nta
ka i
nsi
dio
sa
Boh
.T
abeb
uia
och
race
aB
IGA
G10
5/V
I/19
82D
HJ&
WH
61
82-S
RN
P-1
6955
Tab
ebu
ia o
chra
cea
BIG
L, A
G9
30/V
I/19
89D
HJ&
WH
62
89-S
RN
P-4
48
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
354 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
Tab
ebu
ia o
chra
cea
BIG
L, A
G24
16/V
II/1
989
DH
J&W
H6
289
-SR
NP
-701
Tab
ebu
ia r
osea
(V
er-
tol.)
DC
.B
IGA
G10
27/I
II/1
984
DH
J&W
H6
384
-SR
NP
-42
Asl
amid
ium
sp.
Cal
ath
ea c
rota
life
ra S
. W
atso
nM
AR
AG
2314
/VII
I/19
91R
WF
44
75-R
WF
91
Ch
arid
otel
la n
r. eg
regi
a (B
oh.)
Ipom
oea
sp.
CN
VA
G8
10/V
I/19
89D
HJ&
WH
62
89-S
RN
P-1
6256
Ipom
oea
sp.
CN
VL
G8
25/V
II/1
995
DH
Y&
WH
61
95-S
RN
P-7
192
Ch
arid
otis
cos
tari
-ce
a S
paet
hG
uet
tard
a m
ac-
rosp
erm
a D
onn
. Sm
ith
RU
BA
G15
13/V
III/
1982
DH
J&W
H6
182
-SR
NP
-721
57
Ch
elym
orph
a sp
.Ip
omoe
a tr
ifid
a (K
un
th)
G. D
onC
NV
L, A
G17
18/I
/198
9D
HJ&
WH
66
89-S
RN
P-1
1
Cop
tocy
cla
lepr
osa
Boh
.C
ord
ia a
llio
dor
a (R
. &
P.)
Oke
nB
OR
AG
1030
/V/1
982
DH
J&W
H6
182
-SR
NP
-145
Cor
dia
all
iod
ora
BO
RA
G13
16/V
I/19
89D
HJ&
WH
63
89-S
RN
P-2
18C
ord
ia a
llio
dor
aB
OR
L, A
G25
16/V
/197
9D
HJ&
WH
64
79-S
RN
P-1
7C
opto
cycl
a so
rdid
a B
oh.
Ali
bert
ia e
du
lis
(L.
Ric
h.)
A. R
ich
.R
UB
AG
114/
V/1
980
DH
J&W
H6
880
-SR
NP
-37
58
Cyd
ista
div
ersi
foli
a (H
.B.K
.) M
iers
BIG
AG
1118
/VI/
1991
RW
F1
266
-RW
F91
Cyd
ista
div
ersi
foli
aB
IGL
, AG
1022
/VI/
1989
DH
J&W
H6
689
-SR
NP
-296
Cyd
ista
div
ersi
foli
aB
IGL
, AG
103/
VI/
1992
DH
J&W
H6
592
-SR
NP
-151
1C
ydis
ta d
iver
sifo
lia
BIG
L, A
G10
19/V
/199
4D
HJ&
WH
69
94-S
RN
P-3
006
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 355
Tab
ebu
ia
impe
tigi
nos
a (M
art.
ex
DC
.) S
tan
dl.
BIG
L, P
G25
16/V
/197
9D
HJ&
WH
12
79-S
RN
P-1
6B
Dor
ynot
a au
rita
(B
oh.)
Tab
ebu
ia i
mpe
tigi
-n
osa
BIG
AG
39/
VII
/199
1R
W &
CA
F
low
ers,
LM
, T
A &
K. I
. K
etch
em
427
90-R
WF
91
Tab
ebu
ia i
mpe
tigi
-n
osa
BIG
L, A
G25
16/V
/197
9D
HJ&
WH
61
79-S
RN
P-1
659
Isch
noc
odia
an
nu
lis
(Fab
.)O
cote
a ve
ragu
ensi
sL
AU
A AG
105/
XI/
1979
8/I/
1982
DH
J&W
H1 1
4 179
-SR
NP
-311
82-S
RN
P-1
360
Om
ocer
us
caer
ule
-op
un
ctat
a (B
oh.)
Cor
dia
spi
nes
cen
s L
.B
OR
AC
15/
IX/1
991
RW
F, D
. Cot
o,
J. S
aun
ders
47
47-R
WF
9161
Ore
xita
wag
ner
i (B
oh.)
Cor
dia
pan
amen
sis
Ril
eyB
OR
A L, A
G8
23/V
I/19
8024
/VI/
1982
DH
J&W
H6 6
1 180
-SR
NP
-218
82-S
RN
P-3
23C
ord
ia p
anam
ensi
sB
OR
A L, A
G9
4/V
II/1
980
2/V
II/1
983
DH
J&W
H6 6
1 180
-SR
NP
-309
83-S
RN
P-6
99B
urs
era
sim
aru
baB
UR
AG
109/
I/19
82D
HJ&
WH
14
82-S
RN
P-1
762
Ph
yson
ota
alu
tace
a B
oh.
Cor
dia
118
90B
OR
AG
1413
/V/1
980
DH
J&W
H6
180
-SR
NP
-56
63
Cor
dia
in
erm
is L
.B
OR
L, A
G5
11/V
I/19
91R
WF
61
100-
RW
F91
Cor
dia
in
erm
isB
OR
AG
1114
/V/1
985
DH
J&W
H6
285
-SR
NP
-185
Ph
yson
ota
nr.
alu
tace
aB
ourr
eria
hu
anit
a H
emsl
.B
OR
LG
194/
VII
/198
3D
HJ&
WH
624
83-S
RN
P-7
1464
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
356 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
Pla
giom
etri
ona
cru
cipe
nn
is (
Boh
.)A
ster
acea
eA
ST
AG
1011
/VII
/198
2D
HJ&
WH
62
82-S
RN
P-5
45
Pla
giom
etri
ona
test
ud
inar
ia (
Boh
.)L
ycop
ersi
con
esc
ule
n-
tum
Mil
l.S
OL
L, A
G14
30/V
II/1
986
DH
J&W
H6
786
-SR
NP
-477
65X
enoc
assi
s am
bita
(C
ham
p.)
Ipom
oea
sp.
CN
VA
A1
21/V
/199
1R
WF
35
46-R
WF
91
TA
BL
E 1
.(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
FE
ED
ING
RE
CO
RD
S O
F C
OS
TA
RIC
AN
LE
AF B
EE
TL
ES. S
EE
TE
XT F
OR
EX
PL
AN
AT
ION
OF C
OL
UM
NS.
Lea
f B
eetl
eP
lan
tP
lan
t Fa
mil
yS
tage
Loc
alit
yD
ate
Col
lect
ors
Sco
reN
o.V
ouch
erN
ote
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 357
The alternative hypothesis is that ecological mediation (colonization and hosttransfer) is the primary explanation for current host associations. In cases of ecologi-cal mediation, phylogenies of herbivores and host plants are not congruent, and hostshifts are not necessarily between sister taxa of plants Anderson (1993). In a surveyof the Curculioninae (Curculionidae), Anderson (1993) found that in taxa where sys-tematics and plant associations were reasonably well known, evidence for cospecia-tion of plant and insect taxa is lacking, and ecological mediation appeared to be therule. However, like the Chrysomelidae, the majority of curculionine taxa lack any hostplant data. Until host plants are known for a much larger proportion of phytophagousinsect taxa, speculations on the evolution of host plant selection by insects will con-tinue to be based on small subsets of the phytophagous insect universe.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We sincerely thank the staffs of the Area de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG), andthe Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBio) for their assistance and many kind-nesses during the course of this study. This research was funded in part by a grant(FLAX 91005) from the CSRS, USDA, to Florida A&M University, a National ScienceFoundation Mid-Career Fellowship (BSR-9003898) to the senior author, and NSFDEB-9400829 to the junior author.
REFERENCES CITED
ANAYA R., S. 1987. Chrisomelinos (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) del Valle de México.Centro de Entomología y Acarología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Chapingo,México. 84 p.
ANDERSON, R. S. 1993. Weevils and plants—phylogenetic versus ecological mediationof evolution of host plant associations in Curculioninae (Coleoptera, Curculion-idae). Mem. Entomol. Soc. Canada, No. 165: 197-232.
BACH, C. E. 1986. A comparison of the responses of two tropical specialist herbivoresto host plant patch size. Oecologia 68: 580-584.
BECHYNÉ, J. 1955. Troisième note sur les Chrysomeloidea Néotropicaux des collec-tions de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique (Col. Phytophaga),deuxième partie (1). Bull. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belgique 19: 1-28.
BECHYNÉ, J., AND SPRINGLOVÁ DE BECHYNÉ. 1975. Notas sobre la serie filética de Mo-nomacra y sus formas convergentes (Col. Phytophaga, Alticidae). Rev. Fac.Agron. (Maracay), 8: 25-140.
BEGOSSI, A., AND W. W. BENSON. 1988. Host plants and defense mechanisms in Oedi-onychina (Alticinae), pp. 57-71 in Biology of Chrysomelidae, P. Jolivet, E. Petit-pierre and T. H. Hsiao, eds. Kluwer, the Netherlands. 640 pp.
BUZZI, Z. J., AND J. A. WINDER. 1986. Stages and life cycle of Drepanocassis profana(Boh., 1855) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) on Hyptis suaveolens (L.)Poit. (Labiatae) in Brazil. Revta. brasilense Entomol. 30: 31-41.
CROWSON, R. A. 1955. The natural classification of the families of Coleoptera. London.187 pp.
FARRELL, B. D., AND C. MITTER. 1990. Phylogenesis of insect/plant interactions: havePhyllobrotica leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae) and the Lamiales diversified in par-allel? Evolution 44: 1389-1403.
FLOWERS, R. W. 1991. Aggregations of Cassidinae (Chrysomelidae) in Santa Rosa andGuanacaste National Parks, Costa Rica. Biotropica, 23: 308-310.
FLOWERS, R. W. 1996. La subfamilia Eumolpinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) enAmérica Central. Rev. Biol. Trop., Pub. esp. No. 2: 1-60.
FLOWERS, R. W., D. G. FURTH, AND M. C. THOMAS. 1994. Notes on the distribution andbiology of some Florida leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Coleopts Bull.48-79-89.
358 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
FURTH, D. G. 1985. Some flea beetles and their foodplants from Kenya (Chrysomel-idae: Alticinae). Coleopts Bull. 39: 259-263.
HAWKESWOOD, T. J., AND D. G. FURTH. 1994. New host plant records for some Austra-lian Alticinae. Spixiana 17: 43-49.
HILJE Q., L., C. ARAYA F., AND R. SCORZA R. 1991. Plagas y enfermedades forestalesen América Central; guía de campo. Serie Técnica, Manual Técnico 4, CentroAgronomico Tropical de Investigacion y Enseñanza (CATIE), Turrialba,262+xii pp.
HSIAO, T. H. 1988. Host specificity, seasonality and bionomics of Leptinotarsa beetles,p. 581-599 in Biology of Chrysomelidae, P. Jolivet, E. Petitpierre and T. H.Hsiao, eds. Kluwer, the Netherlands. 640 pp.
JANZEN, D. H. 1980a. Specificity of seed-attacking beetles in a Costa Rican deciduousforest. Journal of Ecology 68: 929-952.
JANZEN, D. H. 1980b. When is it coevolution? Evolution 34: 611-612.JANZEN, D. H. 1993. Caterpillar seasonality in a Costa Rican dry forest, pp. 448-477
in Caterpillars: Ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging, N. E.Stamp and T. M. Casey, eds. Chapman and Hall, New York,
JANZEN, D. H., AND I. D. GAULD (in press). Patterns of use of large moth caterpillars(Lepidoptera: Saturniidae and Sphingidae) by ichneumonid parasitoids (Hy-menoptera) in Costa Rican dry forest, in Forests and Insects, A. D. Watt, N. E.Stork and M. D. Hunter, eds., Chapman and Hall, London
JOHNSON, C. D. 1990. Systematics of the seed beetle genus Acanthoscelides(Bruchidae) of northern South America. Trans. American Entomol. Soc. 116:297-618.
JOLIVET, P. 1977. Sélection trophique chez les Eupoda (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae).Bull. Soc. Linn. Lyon 46: 321-336.
JOLIVET, P. 1978. Sélection trophique chez les Clytrinae, Cryptocephalinae et Chlam-isinae (Camptosoma) et les Lamprosomatinae (Cyclica)(Coleoptera Chrysomel-idae). Acta Zool. Path. Antverpiensia 70: 167-200.
JOLIVET, P. 1979. Les Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) des Citrus et apparentes (Ruta-ceae) en zone temperée et tropicale. Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon 48: 197-256.
JOLIVET, P. 1982. Les Eumolpinae (Col. Chrysomelidae) des Apocynaceae et des Ascl-epiadaceae (Gentianales). Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon 51: 214-222.
JOLIVET, P., E. PETTITPIERRE, AND M. DACCORDI. 1986. Les plantes-hôtes des Chry-somelidae. Quelques nouvelles précisions et additions (Coleoptera). Nouv. Re-vue Entomol. 3: 341-357.
JOLIVET, P. 1987a. Aperçu de la sélection trophique chez les Galerucinae. Étude pargenre (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Bull. Ann. Soc. r. belge Entomol. 123: 283-307.
JOLIVET, P. 1987b. Sélection tropique chez les Megascelinae et les Eumolpinae (Cy-clica)(Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon 56: 199-208,217-240.
JOLIVET, P. 1988a. Sélection trophique chez les Cassidinae (Coleoptera Chrysomel-idae). Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon 57: 301-320.
JOLIVET, P. 1988b. Food habits and food selection of Chrysomelidae. Bionomic andevolutionary perspectives, pp. 1-23, in Biology of Chrysomelidae. P. Jolivet, E.Petitpierre and T. H. Hsiao, eds. Kluwer, the Netherlands. 640 pp.
JOLIVET, P. 1989. Sélection trophique chez les Hispinae (Coleoptera ChrysomelidaeCryptosoma) Bull. mens. Soc. linn. Lyon, 58: 297-317.
JOLIVET, P. 1991. Sélection trophique chez les Alticinae (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae).Bull. mens. Soc. linn. Lyon, 60: 26-40; 53-72.
JOLIVET, P., AND T. J. HAWKESWOOD. 1995. Host-plants of Chrysomelidae of theworld. Backhuys, Leiden. 281 pp.
KING, A. B. S., AND J. L. SAUNDERS. 1984. The invertebrate pests of annual food cropsin Central America. Overseas Development Administration. London. 166 pp.
MEMMOTT, J., H. C. GODFRAY, AND B. BOLTON. 1993. Predation and parasitism in atropical herbivore community. Ecological Entomology 18: 348-352.
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 359
MOLDENKE, A. R. 1970. A revision of the Clytrinae of North America north of the Isth-mus of Panama (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Stanford University.
MOLDENKE, A. R. 1971. Host-plant relations of phytophagous beetles in Mexico. Pan-Pacific Entomol. 47: 105-116.
MONRÓS, F. A. 1949. Descripción de las metamorfosis de Lamprosoma chorisiae Mon-rós y consideraciones taxonómicas sobre Lamprosominae (Col. Chrysomel-idae). Acta Zoo. Lill. 7: 449-466.
OSTMARK, H. E. 1975. Banana pests in the genus Colaspis including description of anew species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Florida Entomol. 58: 1-8.
REID, C. A. M. 1995. A cladistic analysis of subfamilial relationships in the Chry-somelidae sensu lato (Chrysomeloidea), pp. 557-631 in Biology, Phylogeny, andClassification of Coleoptera: Papers Celebrating the 80th Birthday of Roy A.Crowson, J. Pakaluk and S. A. Slipinski,´ eds. Muzeum I Instytut Zoologii PAN,Warszawa.
REID, C. A. M. 1996. More on the family Bruchidae. Chrysomela Newsletter 31: 3.REID, W. V., S. A. LAIRD, R. GÀMEZ, A. SITTENFELD, D. H. JANZEN, M. A. GOLLIN, AND
C. JUMA. 1993. Biodiversity prospecting: using genetic resources for sustain-able development. World Resources Institute. Baltimore, MD. 341+ix pp.
ROCKWOOD, L. L. 1974. Seasonal changes in the susceptibility of Crescentia alataleaves to the flea beetle Oedionychus sp. Ecology 55: 142-148.
SCHRODER, W. W., B. PUTTLER, S. S. IZHEVSY, AND D. GANDOLFO. 1994. Viviparity andlarval development of Platyphora quadrisignata (Germar) in Brazil. ColeoptsBull. 48: 237-243.
STRAUSS, S. Y. 1988. The Chrysomelidae: a useful group for investigation of herbi-vore-herbivore interactions, pp. 91-106 in Biology of Chrysomelidae, P. Jolivet,E. Petitpierre and T. H. Hsiao, eds. Kluwer, the Netherlands. 640 pp.
STRONG, D. R. 1977a. Rolled-leaf hispine beetles (Chrysomelidae) and their Zingib-erales host plants in Middle America. Biotropica 9: 156-169.
STRONG, D. R. 1977b. Insect species richness: hispine beetles of Heliconia latispatha.Ecology 58: 573-582.
VERMA, K. K., AND R. SAXENA. 1996. The status of Bruchidae a a family. ChrysomelaNewsletter 32: 3.
WILCOX, J. A. 1983. Checklist of the beetles of North and Central America and theWest Indies. Vol. 8. The Leaf Beetles and the bean weevils. Family 129. Chry-somelidae. E. J. Brill. New York, 166 pp.
WINDSOR, D. M. 1986. Natural history of a subsocial tortoise beetle, Acromis sparsaBoheman (Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) in Panama. Psyche 94: 127-150.
WINDSOR, D. M., E. G. RILEY, AND H. P. STOCKWELL. 1992. An introduction to the bi-ology and systematics of Panamanian tortoise beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomel-idae: Cassidinae), pp. 372-391 in D. Quintero and A. Aiello, eds. Insects ofPanama and Mesoamerica. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 692+xxii pp.
360 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
APPENDIX 1—ABBREVIATIONS OF PLANT FAMILY NAMES IN TABLE 1.
ACA Acanthaceae CNV Convolvulaceae MYR MyrsinaceaeAMA Amarantaceae DIO Dioscoreaceae ONA OnagraceaeAPO Apocynaceae ERY Erythroxylaceae PAS PassifloraceaeASC Asclepiadaceae ERI Ericaceae PIP PiperaceaeAST Asteraceae EUP Euphorbiaceae POA PoaceaeBIG Bignoniaceae FAB Fabaceae: POL PolygonaceaeBOR Boraginacaea Papilionoidea RUB RubiaceaeBUR Burseraceae FLA Flacourtiaceae RUT RutaceaeCAE Fabaceae: HIP Hippocrateaceae SPI Sapindaceae
Caesalpinoidea LAU Lauraceae SPO SapotaceaeCAP Capparidaceae LOG Loganiaceae SIM SimarubaceaeCLU Clusiaceae MLP Malpighiaceae SOL SolanaceaeCEC Cecropiaceae MLV Malvaceae STE SterculiaceaeCOC Cochlospermaceae MAR Marantaceae URT UrticaceaeCOM Combretacaea MEL Melostomataceae VER VerbenaceaeCON Connaraceae MIM Fabaceae: VIT Vitaceae
Mimosoidea ZIN Zingiberaceae
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 361
APPENDIX 2— LOCALITIES FROM TABLE 1.
G1 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla,Estacion Pitilla, 8 km S Santa Cecilia, 700 m (N330000, E380400)
G2 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector El Hacha,Cerro el Hacha, 10 km SE La Cruz, 300 m (N331700, E365400)
G3 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Area RecreativaJunquillal, 3 km N Cuajiniquil, 0 m (N328000, E351700)
G4 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Orosi, Esta-cion Maritza, 20 km SE La Cruz (N326500, E372200)
G5 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Estacion Pocosol, 20km S La Cruz, 250 m (N319000, E361100)
G6 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Orosí, Esta-cion Maritza, sendero Casa Fran, 21 km SE La Cruz, 600 m (N326000,E373300)
G7 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Estacion SantaRosa, 28 km NNW Liberia, 250 m (N313700, E359000)
G8 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Bosque Humedo, 30 km NNW Liberia, 300 m (N314800, E360500)
G9 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Cafetal, 31 km NNW Liberia, 300 m (N315500, E360200)
G10 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Bosque San Emilio, 29 km NNW Liberia, 300 m (N313800, E359800)
G11 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Sendero Natural, 28 km NNW Liberia, 250 m (N313100, E359900)
G12 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Finca Rosa Maria, 26 km NNW Liberia, 250 m (N311000, E359500)
G13 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Casona, 28 km NNW Liberia, 250 m (N313000, E359900)
G14 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Area Administrativa, 29 km NNW Liberia, 250 m (N313500, E358900)
G15 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Cliff Top Light, 31 km NNW Liberia, 300 m (N315200, E360200)
G16 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Casetilla Entrada, 33 km NNW Liberia, 300 m (N317800, E362600)
G17 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Laguna Escondida, 30 km NNW Liberia, 250 m (N314500, E357900)
G18 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Llano Guacimal, 32 km NNW Liberia, 300 m (N317000, E361600)
G19 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Canyon del Tigre, 18 km NW Irigaray, 200 m (N310000, E356800)
G20 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Naranjo,Playa Naranjo, 0 m (N307000, E354500)
G21 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Naranjo, Sen-dero Real, 10 m (N309000, E354000)
G22 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Cruz de Piedra, 33 km NNW Liberia, 300 m (N317200, E360900)
G23 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Cacao,EstacionCacao, 9 km N Quebrada Grande, 1000 m (N323100, E375500)
362 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
G24 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Finca Jenny, 30 km NNW Liberia, 200 m (N316200, E364200)
G25 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservation Guanacaste, Sector SantaRosa,Vado Rio Poza Salada, 17 km NW Irigaray, 10 m (N308900, E355700)
G26 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Quebrada Guapote, 27 km NNW Liberia, 200 m (N312700, E361700)
G27 Guanacaste Prov., Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa,Quebrada Costa Rica, 250 m (N312200, E357500)
G28 Guanacaste Prov., Potrerillos, Rio Tempisque, 23 km NNW Liberia, 100 m(N310900, E367400)
G29 Guanacaste Prov., Finca La Pacifica, 5 km NW Canas.G30 Guanacaste Prov., 12 km NW of Bebedero, Hacienda Horizontes.G31 Guanacaste Prov., Bebedero, Ingenio Taboga.A1 Alajuela Prov., Finca San Gabriel, 2 km SW Dos Ríos, 600 mA2 Alajuela Prov., Reserva Forestal San Ramon, 900 mA3 Alajuela Prov., Bijagua, 20 km S Upala, 500 mA4 Alajuela Prov., Canton La Guacima, Río Segundo, 780 mA5 Alajuela Prov., Canton Ciruelas, Río Ciruelas, 800 mH1 Heredia Prov., Estac. Biol. La Selva, 50 mS1 San José Prov., San Pedro, Univ. Costa RicaS2 San José Prov., El Rodeo, 1.5 km S Ciudad ColonC1 Cartago Prov., Pavones, nr. TurrialbaC2 Cartago Prov., Madreselva, nr. EmpalmeC3 Cartago Prov., Carretera Interamericana, 7 km S. CartagoC4 Cartago Prov., Cerro Asunción, paramo vegetation, 3396 mC5 Cartago Prov., Tapanti, Refugio Vida SilvestreP1 Puntarenas Prov., Reserva Forestal MonteverdeP2 Puntarenas Prov., Peninsula de Osa, Est. Boscosa, Reserva Forestal Golfo
DulceP3 Puntarenas Prov., Peninsula de Osa, Cerro de Oro
APPENDIX 2—(CONTINUED) LOCALITIES FROM TABLE 1.
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 363
Appendix 3—Notes to Table 1.
1. These beetles were sitting on heavily eaten leaves, 1.5 m above ground.2. Additional specimens were observed at time of collection, and C. Chavez reported
seeing this species frequently on the same host plant.3. This species was tested on the host plant. Jolivet (1978) gave Asteraceae, Mimo-
saceae, Ericaceae and Fagaceae as other host plant families of this genus. 4. This species was found feeding at shoot tips of its host plant.5. The host plant is an abundant roadside weed on the entrance road in Sector
Santa Rosa and elsewhere in this sector. Beetles have been collected both in therainy and dry seasons. The larvae make cone-shaped cases, apparently utilizinghairs of the host’s leaves. Moldenke (1971) listed both Malvaceae and Convolvu-laceae as host plant families for this species.
6. The vouchers were collected from a swarm of this species feeding on the low bushin dense dry forest. The intense feeding and mating activity was similar to thatobserved in other Clytrinae (Flowers et al. 1994, Moldenke 1971). Jolivet (1978)lists Mimosaceae as the predominant host for this genus.
7. The beetle was seen eating bark of new stems. Monrós (1949) and Jolivet (1978)described bark feeding by other members of this genus.
8. This species was very abundant on the leaves of its host at several regeneratingpasture sites in 1991. This cosmopolitan genus has been recorded from Arali-aceae from the Palearctic and from Myrtaceae from Puerto Rico (Jolivet 1978).
9. In 1991 this species was very abundant in the pastures and open areas after theonset of the summer rains. Individuals were also collected on other pastureshrubs. The collection of Jan Bechyné in Maracay Venezuela contains severalspecimens of this species collected in El Salvador and bearing the (apparently)manuscript name "saltator". The only other host record for this genus is Theo-broma cacao L. (Sterculeaceae) for an unidentified species (Jolivet 1987b).
10. Jolivet (1987b) stated that all host observations of the genus Chalcophana havebeen Asteraceae.
11. Although only one voucher was preserved, numerous adults were observed, andseveral were tested on the leaves of the plant host. Jolivet (1987b) noted that thisgenus is both cosmopolitan and polyphagous.
12. Adults were feeding at night on very new expanding leaves of a 1.5 m shoot atbase of tree. Jolivet (1987b) stated that the only reliable feeding records for thisgenus are from Fabaceae.
13. The only host records in the literature for Percolaspis are from Poaceae and Theo-broma cacao (Jolivet 1987b).
14. This species has been found feeding on several species of Rubiaceae. Adults areagile leapers when disturbed. Jolivet (1987b) gave a single record for this genus:Persea (Lauraceae) for a Cuban Phanaeta.
15. Adults of this genus were found on new foliage and in some years defoliated theirhosts.
16. This species was very common feeding on various species of Melastomataceae.Jolivet (1987b) described Typophorus as polyphagous but does not list any Melas-tomataceae among its host plants.
17. The voucher is one of many collected, seen and reared at Estación Pitilla and SanGabriel on various species of Solanum.
18. Larvae skeletonize host plant leaves. This species extensively defoliates its hostduring some years. Literature records for New World Plagiodera are limited toSalix, Populus (Salicaceae), Croton (Euphorbiaceae), and Lueha (Tiliaceae); how-
364 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
ever, species in the Philippines and India have been reported on Xylosoma andFlacourtia (Flacourtiaceae) (Jolivet & Hawkeswood 1995).
19. This is the most commonly collected of the Costa Rican species of Platyphora.During one feeding test, two very small larvae were observed in the plastic bagwhich up till then held a single female, suggesting that Platyphora bicolor is vi-viparous. Schroder et al. (1994) described the biology of the viviparous Platy-phora quadrisignata (Germar) from southern Brazil.
20. Adults and larvae were frequently found feeding on host plant throughout the1991 rainy season. Apparently, our observations represent the only known hostplant data for Stilodes.
21. A group was followed from egg to adult. Larvae feed and rest on underside ofleaves. Pupation takes place in leaf litter.
22. Larvae are sooty black, covered with branched hair-like projections, and with redheads. Pupae are yellow. This chrysomelid was parasitized by Myopharous (Ta-chinidae: Diptera).
23. In 1991 this beetle caused a major defoliation of its host plant, a pioneer speciesin cleared pastures.
24. The host plant of this galerucine was found growing along the edge of a smallpatch of forest.
25. The host plant was a low understory tree in tropical dry forest.26. This galerucine was seen on several occasions feeding on young leaves of its host
plant. This genus has been recorded from Acacia (Fabaceae) in the USA (Jolivet1987a).
27. A large group of these Masurius (which may represent more than one species)was found feeding on the two host plants growing within a few yards or eachother along a trail in montane forest.
28. This and the following species were reared to adult.29. In addition to the voucher specimens, other specimens were collected two years
earlier on the same host plant.30. RWF has observed adults of this species every year since 1989 defoliating basal
shoots of a tree growing in front of the main administration building at the Uni-versity of Costa Rica. Jolivet (1987a) listed Cordia and Lantana (Verbenaceae) ashosts of this genus.
31. RWF observed on individual at night eating a hole in the middle of a leaf of theIpomoea host plant.
32. In both cases, beetles were observed feeding on the host plant. Jolivet (1991)listed Labiaceae and Verbenaceae as probable hosts for this genus and notedother citations of Lauraceae, Buddlejaceae, Asteraceae, Umbelliferae, Sterculi-aceae, and Fabaceae.
33. In addition to the vouchered specimen from Byrsonima crassifolia, this specieswas abundant on this host plant at Estacion Maritza (G4) in 1991.
34. Unlike many other chrysomelids which were found associated only with youngfoliage, A. salvadorense was found actively feeding late in the rainy season onolder leaves.
35. A large group of these beetles was found on a broken stalk of the host plant, feed-ing on sap and milky latex. The host plant was growing in the shaded understoryof montane forest.
36. Adults were reared from larvae feeding on the host plant.37. Jolivet (1991) listed Samanea (Fabaceae/pap.) as a host of this genus.38. Jolivet (1991) cited Theobroma and Tecoma (Bignoniaceae) as other known host
plants of this alticine genus.
Flowers & Janzen: Chrysomelid Feeding Records 365
39. Both this and the following host plant were growing close together in a mixedstand next to a road.
40. The host plant, growing in a wet depression in a cleared area, sustained heavyfeeding damage from this alticine in 1991. Jolivet (1991) listed Cleome, Solanum,Beta (Chenopodiaceae), Labiaceae, Cordia, and Adiantum (Adiantaceae) as hostplants of Leptophysa.
41. These beetles were swept from a tree that showed heavy feeding damage to theleaves. No active feeding was observed, but this collection was made during anabnormal dry spell during what was supposed to be the wet season.
42. This Longitarsus is a flightless species.43. Field observations by DHJ indicate that the adult appears on the host plant to
oviposit; larvae are free living and cut islands out of leaf margin.44. The host plant is a small prostrate weed. The beetles were first observed resting
and defecating on a shrub of Luehea (Tiliaceae) which grew over the Evolvulus.When no feeding damage on the Luehea was seen, despite the beetle activity, awider search revealed the true host plant.
45. These small pinkish-orange flea beetles were observed feeding on newly expand-ing leaves (which are also reddish to pinkish orange) of their ericaceous hosts.
46. This alticine was collected abundantly from a very dense stand of its host plant.In 1994 it was found equally abundantly in the same stand of plants.
47. RWF has observed this species over several years, actively feeding on Euphorbi-aceae even during the dry season in quite arid habitats.
48. These represent five different morphospecies of Syphrea collected on variousplants.
49. This species feeds by scraping pits in the expanding leaves of this host plant. Thefollowing plant record may be an alternate dry season food source.
50. Huge numbers of this species were found defoliating the host plant during thevoucher year. In 1991, on the other hand, no specimens were found and no dam-age to the host was apparent. This is the species called Oedionychis sp. in Rock-wood (1974). Bechyné (1955) restricted the definition of true Oedionychis to asmall group of flightless Mediterranean flea beetles. New World species formerlyin Oedionychis are now placed in Walterianella, Alagoasa and other genera.
51. Jolivet (1991) listed Venezuelan records of Gardinia (Rubiaceae) and Tabebuia(Bignoniaceae) for this genus.
52. The genus Cephaloleia is well known from various species of Heliconia and otherZingiberales (Strong 1977a,b). This species was regularly encountered in rolled-up terminal leaves of Costus at this and other localities.
53. This hispine was very abundant in a dense stand of grass growing on a river sand bar.54. A large number of these hispines were feeding on and heavily damaging leaves
of a shrub of its host growing along the bank of a river in deep shade.55. These cassids have black larvae with long black caudal brushes; the pupae have
a creamy white thorax. Adults were reared.56. Windsor et al. (1992) gave Ipomoea lindenii Mart. & Gal. as host plant for true
C. egregia.57. This species periodically defoliates its host.58. Feeding on young leaves of Alibertia was seen; some feeding damage was also
seen on the two bignoniaceous plants as well.59. The cassid caused a major defoliation in 1979, but has been rare since. The 1991
record was from a single tree growing by the seashore and heavily damaged by agroup of the cassids. Jolivet (1988a) also listed Tabebuia and other Bignoniaceaeas hosts for this genus.
366 Florida Entomologist 80(3) September, 1997
60. These records are of beetles aestivating in the dry season; see Flowers (1991) formore details on this behavior. Windsor et al. (1992) listed several species of Cor-dia as the true host plants of this species.
61. The host plant was an understory plant in a pine plantation. Jolivet (1988a) alsolisted Hyptis (Labiaceae) as a host plant for this genus.
62. The record from Bursera simaruba is for beetles hiding under bark plates duringthe dry season. Jolivet (1988a) listed Phaseolus (Fabaceae) and Passiflora (Pas-sifloraceae) for this genus.
63. In 1991 this species was common during the rainy season. A colony at the Ad-ministration Area in Sector Santa Rosa (G14) was followed for several months,during which time predatory pentatomids were observed resting on foliage abovethe cassids, and occasionally descending to feed on them.
64. Windsor et al. (1992) listed Cordia spinescens for a P. nr. alutacea from Panama.65. Windsor et al. (1992) also list Solanum seaforthianum Andr. and Physalis cor-
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
data Mill (Solanaceae).