Jerry FitzPatrick, David Holmberg, Tom Nelson, Eric Simmon, Ken Wacks, Dave Hardin, and other DEWG ChairsMonday May 24, 2010

•3:30 SG Domain Expert Working Groups Joint Session Charter Overview

• Introduction of work items for each DEWG: H2G, B2G, I2G, T&D, B&P, V2G

•3:40 Do we have the right DEWGs?• a discussion on how best to sub-divide the work to accomplish the mission

• Are we missing any stakeholders, or missing needed collaboration? • What are the overlaps – where should DEWGs be coordinated?

•3:55 Discussion of conclusions•4:05 A look at the PAPs and where they fit on the Conceptual

Architecture • Have we covered the bases? • What PAPs should the DEWGs be monitoring• What what new PAP areas should the DEWGs be exploring?

•4:20 Discussion of conclusions•4:30 Adjourn

DEWGs in context of SGIP

Officers: Chair• At the decision of the DEWG, a Vice Chair and Secretary may also be

elected.• DEWG officers will be confirmed by NIST.

DEWG Roles and Responsibilities:Perform analysis of standards interoperability

• Identify gaps and overlaps• Evaluate PAP proposals and collaborate on PAPs where appropriate• Analyze smart grid interoperability requirements• Review other SGIP group work products to provide domain perspective• Respond to SGIP requests for domain analysis

Provide the strategic DEWG domain perspective• identify strategic issues that need to be addressed• Provide input on ongoing development and direction of NIST Framework• Identify regulatory and policy issues

Work Process/Outputs:• Sub-groups may be created to address tasks• Outputs may be white papers, use cases, or any other format as deemed

by the DEWG; posted on the DEWG collaboration site and IKB; presentations by experts in workshops & tutorials

Deliverables: Individual or collective reviews of a proposed PAP plan.

• At request of the GB, give an update on priority standards• Review, extend, modify use cases developed by other SGIP groups• At request of the PMO, review work from a committee• Focus on strategic issues relevant for smart grids and consult with the

GWAC• Develop guidelines for sets of standards that together provide for

communications interoperability to address a specific domain application.

• Building interface to the grid• Architecture, information requirements, standards

interoperability issues at the B2G interface• Interests and concerns of the commercial building

domain stakeholders

• Initial analysis of interoperability needs at the grid to facility interface, and prioritization which served as input to original PAPs.

• Defining the architecture of the interface connections from grid to facility domain

• Analysis of standard technical approach for energy management solution for small commercial market in Japan.

• Discussions on interesting topics like transactive energy and Dutch applications of that.

• Review and discussion of the EIS Alliance use cases and requirements as input to PAP10

• DEWG charter development• Analysis of standards landscape and direction of

PAPs 3, 4, 9• Review of the CSWG NISTIR 7629• This week looking at requirements of the

commercial building domain (vs. residential) to put together a “Commercial Buildings Primer”

• Minutes and some topic pages on the Twiki• Most outputs are indirect—via review and

comment on documents.• B2G Interoperability Assessment and Roadmapping

document. • Papers at Grid Interop based in part on group

discussions.

• Industrial interfaces to the grid• Architecture, information requirements, standards

interoperability issues at the I2G interfaces• Represent the interests and concerns of industrial

stakeholders

•25% of the Grid consumption•Industrial Facilities – Large and Small

• Manufacturing Plants• Continuous - Refining• Batch - Chemical• Discrete – Assembly

• Central Power Plants

•Have captive on-site generation including backup generation•Are large consumers of power•Are highly integrated and automated •Have on-site technical and supports staffs•Are often located far from population centers•Own significant real-estate

•Capital intensive• higher level of utilization to get a sustainable return on investment

•Somewhat inflexible with respect to time• customer commitments and interdependency in process steps

•Products may be perishable•Energy is a significant component of the cost of production.•Consumers and Producers

•Developing an “Industrial Interface Recommendations” White Paper

• Why Industrial Interfaces are Different from Home Interfaces• Clarify the domain needs and requirements of industrial users

•Scope: Utility transmission and distribution operations as well as interactions with other producer/users on the grid.

•Goals:• To create unprecedented robustness and resilience to grid instabilities

and disturbances for improved reliability. • To improve power quality to meet customer needs and enable ready

access for distributed generators to the grid

•Biweekly teleconferences: Wednesdays at 4:00 PM Eastern• http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/

SGIPCalendar•NIST SG Twiki: http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-

sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/TnD

White Papers:•Wide Area Monitoring, Automation, Communications and

Control (WAMACC) for the Bulk Transmission System•Smart Grid for Distribution Systems: The Benefits and

Challenges of Distribution Automation (DA)•Smart Grid Focused Use Cases for Distribution Grid

Management

Presentations:•EPRI Use Case Export/Import Tools and UML Models•Goal-Driven Use Cases

Do we have the right DEWGs?- a discussion on how best to sub-divide

the work to accomplish the mission• Are we missing any stakeholders, or

missing needed collaboration? • What are the overlaps?

Smart Grid Action Plans27

Smart Grid Action Plans 28

1. Use of IP2. Wireless

Guidelines3. Pricing Model4. Scheduling5. Meter Profiles &

Upgrade Std

1

1

1 2

2 2

4

33

33

3

3

5

5

5

Smart Grid Action Plans 29

6. ANSI C12 to Common Info Model (CIM)

7. Storage Interconnect

8. CIM Distribution Models and Harmonization

9. Standard DR Signals

10. Energy Usage to Customer

6

10

7

7

7

7

9

9

910

8

8

Smart Grid Action Plans 30

11. Models for Electric Transportation

12. IEC 61850 to DNP3

13. Time Synch14. Integrate

Transmission & Distribution Models and Relay Settings

12

12

13

14

14

1411

11

11

11

11

PAPs and the Conceptual Architecture • Have we covered the bases? • What PAPs should the DEWGs be monitoring• What new PAP areas should the DEWGs be

exploring?