Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
31C1ISWeea3 2 .7848 MADOC010
RECEIVEDMAR - l 1985
MINING UNDS SECTION
GEOPHYSICAL
EXPLORATION PROGRAM
ON THE
MADOC TALC PROSPECT
OF
TRISAR RESOURCES LTD.
EASTERN ONTARIO MINING DIVISION
NTS 31C/11
Prepared by:
Jens E. Hansen, P.Eng
Geotest Corporation
Nepean, Ontario
February 20, 1985
Project: 60-153
31C11SWM23 2.7648 MADOC
INDEX
010C
INTRODUCTION
LOCATION AND ACCESS
PREVIOUS EXPLORATION
GEOLOGY
TALC DEPOSITS IN THIS ENVIRONMENT
EXPLORATION FOR TALC DEPOSITS USING GEOPHYSICS
GEOPHYSICS - PROCEDURES
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
SUMMARY OF TALC TARGETS
CONCLUSIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
PAGE
l
3
4
5
6
8
10
12
15
16
17
19
MAP l - MAGNETIC CONTOURS
MAP 2 - VLF CONTOURS
MAP 3 - VLF PROFILES
INTRODUCTION
Trisar Resources Ltd. has acquired a 10(^ interest
in the mineral rights of four claims in Madoc Township
in the Eastern Ontario Mining Division. The claims,
which cover a talc prospect, straddle the contact
between the Moira granite intrusion and Grenville
crystaline dolomite. This is the same contact on which
the Canada Talc Industries Ltd. mine is located less
than 2 kilometres to the west. The latter has been in
continuous operation since 1896 and it is the prime
Canadian producer of high quality talc used for filler
purposes by the manufacturers of paint, rubber and
plastics. The portion of the Trisar property
considered most attractive for talc exploration is
covered by an extensive swamp hence, it will be
necessary to diamond drill to explore the property.
The location of the diamond drill holes should be
selected on the basis of geology and structure
interpreted from geophysical data.
The present report covers the results of a pre
liminary exploration program designed to locate
specific targets for further exploration with the
ultimate objective of determining if talc orebodies
are indeed present on the Trisar property. The
program consisted of detailed geophysical magnetometer
and VLF-EM electromagnetic surveys designed to map the
contact between the Moira granite and crystalline
dolomite and to locate zones of alteration along this
contact. The talc at the Canada Talc Industries mine
occurs as tabular hydrothermal replacement bodies in
crystalline dolomite. The geophysics should be follow
ed up by detailed geological mapping, some geochemical
sampling and diamond drilling.
- 2 -
LOCATION AND ACCESS
The location of the Trisar property in Concession
IX Lot l of Madoc Township is shown on figure 1. It
consists of unpatented mining claims EO 592891, 592892,
592893, 592894 which cover an area of approximately 90
hectares. The claims were recorded on February 22,
1983.
The property is 800 metres south of Highway 7 and
4 kilometres east of the village of Madoc. Pinewood
Lake Road forms the eastern property boundary and
Rapids Road is within a few hundred metres of the
western boundary. Both of these are all weather roads.
Madoc was the centre of the earliest gold and
industrial mineral mining activity in Ontario. It is a
village of approximately 3000 people located 250
kilometres east of Toronto. Madoc is now a farming
community with some tourism. It also serves as the
centre for the talc and dolomite mines of the region.
In addition to an ongoing interest in industrial
minerals, there has been renewed gold exploration
activity in the immediate area.
- 3 -
LOCATION MAP SCALE l* 1/2 milt
FIGURE l FROM MAP 2154
ODM GEOLOGICAL REPORT 73 SCALE l" = 1 /2 mile
LEGEND
2 Basic Metavolcanics, Undifferentiated4 Metasediments, Marble, Undifferentiated5 Metasediments, pelitic rocks7 Diorite and gabbro9 Granite (Moira granite)
MINES AND OCCURRENCES
8 Canada Talc Industries, Conley Mine (talc)9 Canada Talc Industries, Henderson Mine (talc)
16 Grenville Aggregate Specialities Ltd. (marble)30 International Pulp Company Occurrence (talc)36 Minnesota Minerals Ltd. (stone)40 Price Mine (talc)
PREVIOUS EXPLORATION
The only assessment data covering the Trisar
property on file in the Tweed office of the Ontario
Ministry of Resources was a magnetometer survey by G.
Pearse. This survey apparently located the contact of
the Moira granite but was, in the opinion of the
writer, of insufficient detail to adequately map the
subsurface geology to direct a diamond drilling
program.
Two diamond drill holes were drilled on claim
EO 30565 in 1963 some 300 metres north of the Trisar
property. These holes encountered white siliceous
dolomite.
A summary of assessment work carried out in Madoc
Township is contained in OGS Geological Data Inventory
Folio 90.
- 4 -
GEOLOGY
The geology of the area is described in ODM Geolo
gical Report 73 by D.F. Hewitt.
Talc orebodies occur in this environment as
tabular sheets of foliated talc which are hydrothermal
replacement bodies in crystaline dolomite adjacent to
the Moira granite. It is believed that the talc was
developed from the Grenville dolomite by introduction
of hydrothermal fluids that probably originated from
the Moira granite.
As can be seen from the planimetry shown on the
geophysical maps accompanying this report, much of the
central area is covered by swamp. The geology of the
area considered most interesting is beneath the swamp.
The geology of the property is shown in simplified form
on Figure 1. The property covers the contact between
the Moira granite and undifferentiated marble. The
approximate location of the contact appears to be
beneath the central swamp.
- 5 -
TALC DEPOSITS IN THIS ENVIRONMENT
Talc deposits in the Madoc region of Eastern
Ontario are associated with one of two host rocks:
carbonate and mafic silicate. Talc from the mafic host
usually grinds to a pale grey colour, whereas the
carbonate hosted talc contain white grades of talc
unless contaminated by dark minerals. Canada Talc
Industries mines a carbonate hosted deposit and it is
this type that could occur on the Trisar property.
The Canada Talc Industries orebodies occur in
Grenville crystalline dolomite that consists of well-
banded grey and white dolomite and tremolitic dolomite.
The talc occurs as tabular hydrothermal replacement
bodies in crystalline dolomite. The Grenville meta
sediments are cut by basic dikes which are called
madocite dikes. These are found in the orebody but it
is not believed that there is any direct relationship.
The Moira granite intrusion is located a few hundred
metres south of the orebodies. It is believed that the
intrusion was the source of the madocite dikes and the
probable source of the hydrothermal solutions that
formed the talc replacement bodies. Hot water silica
bearing solutions are believed to have ascended faults
and fractures adjacent to the Moira granite. These
solutions altered the dolomite first to tremolite and
then to talc.
- 6 -
Several talc occurrences in Madoc township and
adjacent townships are hosted by the Tudor mafic meta-
volcanics in contact aureoles adjacent to other
granitic bodies namely the Weslemkoon and Elzevir bath-
oliths. In these occurrences there is a ubiquitous
association of talc with magnetite. The magnetite
association suggests that a magnetometer can be used to
help locate this type of occurrence.
- 7 -
EXPLORATION FOR TALC DEPOSITS USING GEOPHYSICS
Exploration for talc has not received a great deal
of attention, hence we do not have the geophysical
exploration case histories for talc deposits that are
available for many of the metallic deposits. We can,
however, substantially anticipate the type of
geophysical response from the following geological
characteristics of the known talc deposits:
1. The talc deposits tend to occur immediately
adjacent to felsic intrusions. Such intrusions
generally have a characteristic magnetic signa
ture.
2. In the case of the adjacent Canada Talc Industries
deposit, dolomitic marble is the host. Generally,
there is little magnetite in this rock type so we
anticipate a smooth magnetic gradient over the
potential host rock.
3. Dillon and Barron observe that talc in the Tudor
mafic metavolcanics contain anomalous magnetite.
In the present case we are dealing with dolomite
so a magnetite enrichment may not occur, however,
considering the limited case histories, isolated
magnetic anomalies within dolomite may be of
interest.
- 8 -
4. The Canada Talc Industries deposit is a hydro
thermal replacement body. In the case of gold
deposits, hydrothermal alteration may cause a
destruction of magnetite, hence isolated negative
magnetic anomalies could occur in the vicinity of
a talc deposit. This process could also lead to
the formation of conductive clays which may be
detectable by electromagnetics.
5. An east-west striking fault has been observed in
the Henderson and Conley Mines of Canada Talc
Industries. This fault may have provided the
conduit for the hydrothermal fluids that altered
the dolomite to tremolite and talc. The VLF
electromagnetic technique has proven itself effec
tive in locating faults. Magnetics can also be
used in certain environments.
6. Being a soft mineral, it is anticipated that
glaciation may have gouged out the tops of talc
deposits in this environment. This may have
created bedrock depressions over the deposits
that could be filled with conductive clays that
could be detectable by electromagnetics.
- 9 -
GEOPHYSICS - PROCEDURES
A total of 13.3 kilometres of line was cut,
chained and picketed at 340 O azimuth. {11.0 km line,
2.3 km base and tie line) The lines were spaced at 100
metre intervals with pickets at 25 metre intervals.
The work was carried out by A. Audet and Yvon Audy from
February 5 - 10, 1985.
The lines and the base line were surveyed at 12.5
metre stations using a Geometrics G846 Unimag II proton
precession magnetometer. This instrument reads to a
sensitivity of l gamma, the magnetic data is presented
in contour format on Map l at a horizontal scale of
1:2500 with a minimum contour interval of 25 gammas
being employed where the gradient permits.
The electromagnetic survey was carried out using a
Geonics EM-16 VLF-EM unit. This is a one man instru
ment which locates conductors by measuring the tilt of
the primary field in degrees and the percentage
strength of the quadrature component of the secondary
field compared to the primary field. The primary field
is generated by electromagnetic transmitters used by
the U.S. Navy for submarine communications There is a
grid of such transmitters around the world. The
particular transmitter used in this case is located in
Cutler Maine (NAA) and transmits at a frequency of 24.0
Khz.
- 10 -
A conductor affects the shape and amplitude of the
transmitted wave and in turn produces a secondary wave.
These waves contain the parameters which are measured
by the VLF-EM unit. The unit responds to a variety of
conductors including graphitic and sulphide bands,
clays and salts in the overburden or trapped in base
ment structures and metallic man-made objects.
The geophysical surveys were carried out by J.
Hansen and B. Valcamp on February 8-10, 1985.
A total of 11.0 kilometres were surveyed by VLF-EM.
Measurements were made at 12.5 metre intervals and the
data is presented on maps at a horizontal scale of 1:2500.
All VLF readings were taken with the instrument operator
facing north and with the instrument held along the picket
lines. The VLF data is presented in contour format on
Map 2 and in profile form on Map 3. These contours have
been generated from the readings using the Fraser numerical
filtering technique.
- 11 -
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
The magnetic pattern over the Moira granite
intrusion is significantly different from the pattern
over the dolomite. As expected, the signature of the
latter consists of smooth contours whereas the former
is distinguished by a pattern of variable magnetometer
readings that are generally 100 to 200 gammas higher
than over the dolomite.
The contact of the intrusion is essentially coin
cident with VLF Conductor 3.
Conductor 3 is probably caused by conductive
material in a major fault, The fault appears to coin
cide, in places at least, with the contact of the Moira
granite. It should be noted that an east-west fault
has been located in the Henderson {9 on map) and Conley
(8) shafts. The International Pulp Company shafts
(talc prospect) are, according to ODM Map 2154, located
on this contact.
Conductor 3 is located within the swampy area
although the axis appears to come onto higher ground on
lines 11 and 12. Prospecting in this vicinity may help
reveal something about the nature of the conductor.
Conductor 3, which extends the entire length of
the property, is considered a high priority target and
- 12 -
in addition to the surface prospecting mentioned above,
it will be necessary to drill the conductor at several
locations to establish if talc is present.
Conductors l and 2 are located in a swampy area
within the Moira granite. They are in a low priority
geological environment and are not, at this stage,
recommended for follow-up.
Conductor 4 occurs approximately 100 metres north
of the intrusion. Considering its proximity to the
property boundary it is not, at this stage, recommended
for follow-up.
Conductor 5 parallels the contact of the intrusion
and is located from 100 and 150 metres north of it.
This conductor appears to occur in the same environment
as the Canada Talc Industries deposits and should
therefore, be considered a priority target. Lines 4
and 5 offer the best locations for a diamond drill
hole.
Conductors 6 and 7 are short single line features.
They are located adjacent to isolated positive and
negative magnetic anomalies. The magnetic anomalies
would, on their own merit, be considered targets. The
adjacent conductors enhance them somewhat. They are
both located in dolomite within 250 metres of the Moira
- 13 -
granite. At least one of these conductors merit drill
ing on a high priority basis.
Conductors 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 are relatively
short, weak responses. They could all be caused by
isolated patches of conductive overburden and are not,
at this stage, recommended for further follow-up. Of
these, the "best" prospect appears to be Conductor 9
but it is still weak and located close to the northern
property boundary.
- 14 -
SUMMARY OF TALC TARGETS
CONDUCTOR
1
2
3
PRIORITY
Low
Low
Highest
DRILL
No
No
3-4 holes
wit
wit
fau
5
6
Intermediate
High
High
High
No
1-2 holes
l hole
l hole
8
9
10
11
Low
Low4"
Low
Low
No
No
No
No
12 Low No
COMMENTS
within Moira granite
within Moira granite
fault zone, contact of granite and dolomite
within dolomite, close to granite contact and property boundary
within dolomite, 100-150 m north of granite
within dolomite adjacent to a magentic anomaly, near contact
within dolomite adjacent to a magnetic anomaly, near contact
probable surface anomaly over dolomite
probable surface anomaly over dolomite
probable surface anomaly over dolomite
probable surface anomaly over dolomite, very weak
probable surface anomaly over dolomite,
- 15 -
CONCLUSIONS
1. The Trisar property is located in the same geolo
gical environment as the Canadian Talc Industries
mine 2 kilometres to the west. This is considered
a property on which similar deposits have a high
priority of occurring. The present geophysical
survey has located at least four targets which
have the type-signature of potential talc deposits
in this setting.
2. Conductor 3 represents a target horizon that
appears to be geologically similar to the Canada
Talc Industries mine and to the adjacent talc
prospects. This target should be drilled at
several locations.
3. Conductors 5, 6 and 7 also merit drilling based on
their geological environments and geophysical
signatures.
4. The remaining conductors and magnetic anomalies
need not be followed up on this stage.
- 16 -
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Detailed geological mapping should be carried out,
at least in the vicinity of the axis of the four
high priority targets. Since the linecutting and
picketing was done in winter, the pickets will
fall over, so they must be reset in the summer
prior to geological mapping.
2. Geochemical sampling may be of marginal value,
considering the swampy terrain and it may not
necessarily contribute to the exploration of the
property.
3. Prior to drilling, the optimum locations should be
selected along the axis of Conductor 3. Addition
ally, it may be advisable to carry out limited
horizontal Loop EM or resistivity over the intend
ed drill hole location to get a better determin
ation of the geometry of the targets.
4. Diamond drilling of in the order of 6 holes to a
depth of approximately 150 metres is recommended.
The size of the core will be determined by what
other operators in the environment are using.
- 17 -
5. Further work on the property will be determined by
the results of the above.
Respectfully submitted,
fens E. Hansen, p.Eng. Geophysicist
- 18 -
BIBLIOGRAPHY
REPORTS
(1) Hewitt, D.F.
(2) Hewitt, D.F.
(3) Young, A.F.
(4) Guidebook
(5) Pearse, G.H.K.
(6) Dillon, E.P. fit Barron, P.S,
Geological notes of Maps 2053, 2054 Madoc - Gananoque Area. ODM G.C. 12, 1964
Geology of Madoc Twp and the Northern Part of Huntingdon Twp f ODM GR 73, 1968
Evaluation of Talc occurrences in EasternOntario,OMNR, 1982 1982
19th Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals, Guidebook for field trips, OGS Miscella neous paper 111, 1983
PPM 300 Magnetometer Survey of claims EO 592891, 892, 893, 894, 1984
Talc in the Tudor Formation, Grenville Supracrustal Series in Southeastern Ontario, OGS OFR 5530, 1985
MAPS
(7) 95G
(8) P 1505
(9) GDIF 90
Aeromagnetic Geophysical Map Kaladar, GSC, 1952
Ontario Mineral Potential Map, Kingston and Part of the Ogdensburg Sheets, OGS 1976
Geological Data Inventory Folio, Madoc Twp, Hastings County, OGS
- 19 -
CERTIFICATE
I, Jens Eskelund Hansen of the City of Nepean, Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton do hereby declare:
in the
1.
2.
3.
That I am a consulting geophysicist residing at Nesbitt Street, Nepean, Ontario K2H 8C4.
19
That I am a graduate of Engineering Physics of Queens University, Kingston, Ontario in 1964 and have been continuously engaged as a practicing geophysicist since that time, and that I am a Registered Professional Engineer in the Province of Ontario.
That I supervised the work discussed in this report and spent three days on the property.
3NS ESKELUND HANSEN, P.Eng
Consulting Geophysicist
Nepean, Ontario February 22, 1985
900
Mining Lands Section
Control Sheet
File No
TYPE OF SURVEY
MINING LAUDS COMMENTS:
V/ GEOPHYSICAL
GEOLOGICAL
GEOCHEMICAL
EXPENDITURE
( UP**?Signature of Assessor
Date
OntarioS:ryof
jrce
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
fi l E.
The Mining Act
Instructions: Please type or print. If number of mining claims traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. Do not use shaded areas below.
Type of Survey(s) "'[Township or Area
Claim Holder(s) S Prospector's Licence No.
AddresiTG
2OO 2.Survey Company
M2JSL X . -r z p
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)
Date of Survey (from Bi to)
!2 i3r l i? i 2*,^ l S3 lto. [ jrVu J Day | Mo. | Yr. J^/ **'' C?
Total Miles of line Cut
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
Days per Claim
40
-T^i.
Days per Claim
f
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits por claim selected in columns st right.
Mining ClaimPrefix
eoNumber
S* c? 2 29 i
Expend. Days Cr,
Mining ClaimPrefix
MININl
Number
MC&j&LOffiCLJO
Expend. Days Cr.
ON JO-m-
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
S
Date
f tt.Recorded HolddfprAtfent (Signature)
Certification Verifying ReportetyTWork
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
Date Certified Certified
1362 (81/9)
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
RECEIVED
MAR - 11985TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT
FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ET
gil ING LANDS SECTION
Type of Survey(s) GeoPhysics, Magnetics Electromagnetics
Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)^
Madoc
Trisar Resources Ltd.3002, 425-lst Street, Calgary AL
T. i ro. T1595
Survey Company Geotest CorporationAuthor of Report o. E. Hansen, Box 11385, Stn "H" Address of Author P.O. Box 11385, Stn "H", Nepean Covering Dates of Survey February 4, 1985 to February l(
(linecutting to office)
Total Miles of Line Cut. 13.3
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer—.
—Radiometric———Other——————
DAYS per claim.
40
Geological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveys)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric
DATE- 2-6
(enter days per claim)
SIGNATURE:of Report or Agejp"
Res. Geol.. OiialifiratinnsoA-
Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
EO 592891'"(prefix)'""
592892(number)
592893
592894
l
B
TOTAL CLAIMS.
837 (5/79)
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
vROUND 'SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
MAGNETIC -X
Number of Stations
iSfction intervalProf i ]p srale
Cnntrmr interval
53212.5 m
Vertical-VLF - 1 cm = 2 0 0;Magnetometer - 25 gammas
Geometrics G846 UNIMAG li
Number of Readings 1880
Line sparing ^-00
Horizontal scale 1:m
2500
Accuracy - Scale constant .. ! gammaDiurnal correction m Base Station check-in Base Station location
rthoH Levelling to tie linesinterval (hniirs) 3 hours
and value Line'0+00 StationValue 56825 gammas
2+OON
2O
Geonics VLF EM-16
ELECTROMAGNETIC
Instrument
Coil configuration .Coil separation .Arrnrary
Method:Freqxipnry
VLF
InfinityDip angle l 0 , quadrature 11
D Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back D In line VLF Cutler Maine 24.0 kHz
(specify V.L.F. station)
D Parallel line
Parameters measured D iP angle in degrees
Quadrature of secondary field as a percentage of the primary.
Instrument — Scale constantCorrections made.
Base station value and location .
Elevation accuracy.
Instrument ————.Method D Time Domain Q Frequency Domain
Parameters - On time __________________________ Frequency ——-—— Off time ____________________________ Range ————————
— Delay time ——^——.^^—^^——.—..-———-—-...——
Integration time ,
Power.Electrode array.
2 Electrode spacing . Type of electrode
SELF POTENTIALInstrument———————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method ——————-————-———-—-———————.^^——-——.——.——
Corrections made—
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument ———.Values measured.
Energy windows (levels)..——————^-——..——^-^—.....——..——.—..——-^^^—.—Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector—-—-————^—^——.———^———.————^^^——.—.———-———Overburden ——^^..^—-.——-^^.^^^.^.^——..^-^—^.^.——.—^^^^^.—-————-——.
(type, depth - include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey.^—^—^^——-—...--—.-.———.^—^— Instrument .—^^—.^—^^^—————-—————-^——— Accuracy__________________________Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s)——— Instrument(s) —————
(specify for each type of survey)Accuracy————————^^—————
(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used————————^_____^-——^———^_^_____
Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude________________________________Line Spacing—— Miles flown over total area.—..-.—.—...-.—————————^—^-—-Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)
Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection—————————
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain—————————
Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent
p.p. m. p. p. b.
DnD
Cu, Pb,
Others—
Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)
Field Analysis (-Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used ——
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ^^-——————
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis,—-—
Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used__
Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory—— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method -
Reagents Used —————
.tests)
.tests)
.tests)
GeneraL General.
GEOTEST
GEOTEST CORPORATIONP.O. Box 11385 Station "H" 19 Nesbitt Street Nepean, Ontario, Canada K2H 7V1Project: 60-153
February 2 1, 1 985
Telephone: 613 828-6462 Telex: 053-3911
PLEASE NOTE;our telephone no is now:613-726-1508
Mrs. R.M. CharneskyMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesWhitney Block, Room 254899 Wellesley Street WestQueen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3
Dear Mrs. Charneksy:
Enclosed are two copies of our technical report on claims in Madoc Township, Eastern Ontario.
Yours sincerely,
JENS E. HANSEN Geophysicist
Copy: Mr. G. Paulus - Trisar Resources Ltd.
MINING RECORDS OFFICE TORONTO
i Euiil tf le
AMMAK - i 1985
c/iO
H
Oo
Tudor' Twp. (M. 156)
V, . ,V,I , VII
Grimsthorpe Twp.(M97)
00
Ci
(DJNJ
LU
Rawdon Twp (M.I768)
Huntingdon Twp. (M. 106) Hungerford Twp. (M. 105)
OUO
THE TOWNSHIP "
OF
MADOCCOUNTY OF
HASTINGS
EASTERN ONTARIO MINING DIVISION
SCALE' l- INCH * 40 CHAINS
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
PATENT, SURFACE AND MINING RIGHTS___ 0
" , SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY _______ O
" , MINING RIGHTS ONLY .._____... 9LEASE, SURFACE AND MINING RIGHTS___ K
" , SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY________ B
" , MINING RIGHTS ONLY ________ H
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ____________. T
ROADS
IMPROVED ROADS
KINGS HIGHWAYS
RAILWAYS
POWER LINES
MARSH OR MUSKEG
MINES
NOTES
This Map Is Not To Be Used -FOR SURVEY PURPOSES
400 SURFACE RIGHTS RESERVATION A LONG THE SHORES OF ALL LAKES AND RIVERS
Areas withdrawn from staking under Section 43 of the Mining Act ( R so 1970). Order No Rile Date Disposition
W2/76 56373 Jan l G 76
5 R.-SURFACE RIGHTSMR.-MINING RIGHTS
M.R.
SAND a GftAVEL
brave!, File 147442
Marble , File 141974
Quarry Hi l
PLAN N O.-M.I20
ONTARIO
MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH
3IC11SW0823 2 .78t8 MADOC 200
GA
RB
AG
ED
UM
P
HU
NT
ING
DO
N
LU
ND
Y
FEN
CE
(w
ire
mes
h )
LO
CA
TIO
N
MA
P
SC
ALE
l
= 1/
2 m
ile
a+
OO
N
I400N
MA
DO
C
TWP
BA
SE
L
INE
0+
00
31
C1
1S
WW
23
2
.78
48
M
AD
OC
210
TR
ISA
R
RE
SO
UR
CE
S
LTD
MA
DO
C
TA
LC
P
RO
SP
EC
T M
AD
OC
T
WP
O
NTA
RIO
N
TS
3IC
/II
.o
VL
FC
ON
TO
UR
S
INS
TR
UM
EN
T
DA
TA
PA
RA
ME
TE
RS
SU
RV
EY
ED
B
Y
RE
PO
RT
B
Y
DA
TE
P
RO
JEC
T
SC
ALE
GE
ON
ICS
E
M-1
6
VLF
C
ON
TO
UR
S
CO
NT
OU
R
INT
ER
VA
L
0,5
,10,
1
J.
HA
NS
EN
,
B.
VA
LC
AM
P
GE
OT
ES
T
CO
RP
OR
AT
ION
FE
BR
UA
RY
,
1985
60
- 15
3
1:2
50
0
50,7
5,10
0
MA
P:
2
SH
EE
T:
lIO
OZO
O
5OO
ME
TE
RS
FE
ET
GA
RB
AG
ED
UM
P
HU
NT
ING
DO
N
TW
P
2 +
OO
N
I400N
MA
DO
C
TW
PB
AS
E
LIN
E 0
+00
LO
CA
TIO
N
MA
PS
CA
LE
l 1/
2 m
ile
31
C1
tSW
aa
a3
2
.78
48
M
AD
OC
22
0
TR
ISA
R
RE
SO
UR
CE
S
LTD
MA
DO
C
TA
LC
P
RO
SP
EC
T M
AD
OC
T
WP
O
NTA
RIO
N
TS
3IC
/II
MA
GN
ET
ICC
ON
TO
UR
S
INS
TR
UM
EN
TD
AT
AP
AR
AM
ET
ER
S
SU
RV
EY
ED
B
Y
RE
PO
RT
B
Y
DA
TE
P
RO
JEC
T
SC
ALE
GE
OM
ET
RIC
S
6*4
6
UN
IMA
G
JJ.
MA
G
CO
NT
OU
RS
CO
NT
OU
R
INT
ER
VA
L
25
gam
m
J.
HA
NS
EN
,
B.
VA
LC
AM
P
G E
OT
ES
T
CO
RP
OR
AT
ION
F
EB
RU
AR
Y ,
1985
60-
153
1:2
500
MA
P:
SH
EE
T:
IOO
ZOO
500
ME
TIE
RS
FE
ET
GA
RB
AG
ED
UM
P
HU
NTI
NG
DO
N
TWP
——
Y
-^-'-^lr-
4 .*
—
MAD
OC
TW
PL
INE
0+
00
NO
TE
(l),
(Q)
scal
e+
40
+20
-20
-4
0
--•-
•- 8
LOC
ATI
ON
M
AP
SCAL
E l"
* 1/
2 m
ile
3IC
HS
WW
23 2
.78
48
M
AD
OC
TRIS
AR
R
ESO
UR
CES
LT
D
MAD
OC
TA
LC
PRO
SPEC
T M
ADO
C
TWP
O
NTA
RIO
N
TS
3IC
/II
VLF
P
RO
FILE
S
INSTRUMENT
DATA
PARAMETERS
SURVEYED BY
REPORT BY
DATE
PROJECT
SCALE
GEO
NIC
S E
M-
16
VLF
PR
OFI
LES
IN
PH
ASE
( l )
l c
m =
20
0 Q
UA
DR
ATU
RE
(Q
) Ic
rr^a
J.
HA
NS
EN
,
B.
VA
LCA
MP
G
EO
TES
T C
OR
PO
RA
TIO
N
FEB
RU
AR
Y ,
19
85
60
- 15
3|:
25
0O
MA
P:
3
SH
EE
T:
lIO
O
SCO
200
23
0
