3169931

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 3169931

    1/3

    American Society of Church History

    The Footnote: A Curious History by Anthony GraftonReview by: Martin E. MartyChurch History, Vol. 67, No. 4 (Dec., 1998), pp. 849-850Published by: Cambridge University Presson behalf of the American Society of Church HistoryStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3169931.

    Accessed: 07/11/2013 09:46

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of

    content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms

    of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    .

    Cambridge University PressandAmerican Society of Church Historyare collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,

    preserve and extend access to Church History.

    http://www.jstor.org

    This content downloaded from 128.104.46.206 on Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:46:39 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=cuphttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aschhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3169931?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3169931?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aschhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=cup
  • 8/14/2019 3169931

    2/3

    BOOK REVIEWSAND NOTESOOK REVIEWSAND NOTES(120).This is a risky historicalenterprise,especially in a work of survey depth.Still, if the execution is questionable, the effort is plausible.The plausibility of Maddox's argument becomes especially clear in theexcellent conclusion, where the authorsurveys contemporaryChristianpoliti-cal action in Poland, EastGermany,LatinAmerica, and South Africa.So, if this book is in some ways a backwards history, marredby presentistbias and dated sources, it can perhaps serve as a catalyst for historians toreturn to some classical questions about the relationshipbetween Christianityand politics, and add to their answers the sort of detail about popular cultureand institutional life that eludes the author here.

    Jon PahlValparaiso UniversityThe Footnote: A Curious History. By Anthony Grafton. Cambridge, Mass.:HarvardUniversity Press, 1997.xiv + 242 pp. $22.95cloth.If this little book were titled TheFootnote:A History,it would be a failure,almost a fraud. One of the last and least things it does is trace the history of thefootnote from its (probably still unknown) beginnings through the rise ofmodern scientific history to the present chaotic situation of citation andpublication. The adjective Curiousserves to characterizethe effort, redeem itfrom failure, and make it an honest contribution, at least in the form ofdiversion for overworked and overspecialized historians.Those who are suspicious of books advertised as curious may fear thatGrafton'swill be a cute work, a trivialization of a scholarly subject,a satire onan obvious target. TheFootnote s anything but that. One might think of it as aset of elegant essays on historiographical subjects that have drawn theattention of the Princeton professor who has written Defenders f the TextandNew Worlds,Ancient Texts.He lets his mind and chapters-and eventually ourcuriosities-wander with apparently aimless ease to confront familiar andunfamiliarhistorical work alike.Graftondoes not explain himself in detail as he meanders from the recent ( )past, with Leopold von Ranke as his example, back through the philosophesand beyond some ecclesiastical historians to Renaissance times. Withouttrying to make much of a thesis for the whole book, he grounds it at the end inthe beginnings: "The CartesianOrigins of the Modern Footnote."On occasion lighthearted and sometimes humorous, Grafton has not cho-sen this genre to display wit or satire so much as to chronicle its presence orabsence. He does not overly involve himself in the endless and irresolvabledisputes about where to locate footnotes or endnotes, though he does tip hishand. Curiously, he does not seem to notice that some chapters deal withauthors who, while they stressed "scientific" historical documentation, didnot make much use of footnotes.Why review this book in ChurchHistory?Fortwo good reasons:It is hard topicture any historian concerned with things sacred or profane who would notfind her or his curiosity aroused or pulse quickened to the excitements thatcome with being a historian. And one of seven chapters is devoted to "TheAntlike Industry of EcclesiasticalHistorians and Antiquaries."The historians in that chapter include the polymathic GermanJesuit Atha-nasius Kircher, whom Grafton locates in Eusebian and Baronion Annales

    (120).This is a risky historicalenterprise,especially in a work of survey depth.Still, if the execution is questionable, the effort is plausible.The plausibility of Maddox's argument becomes especially clear in theexcellent conclusion, where the authorsurveys contemporaryChristianpoliti-cal action in Poland, EastGermany,LatinAmerica, and South Africa.So, if this book is in some ways a backwards history, marredby presentistbias and dated sources, it can perhaps serve as a catalyst for historians toreturn to some classical questions about the relationshipbetween Christianityand politics, and add to their answers the sort of detail about popular cultureand institutional life that eludes the author here.Jon PahlValparaiso University

    The Footnote: A Curious History. By Anthony Grafton. Cambridge, Mass.:HarvardUniversity Press, 1997.xiv + 242 pp. $22.95cloth.If this little book were titled TheFootnote:A History,it would be a failure,almost a fraud. One of the last and least things it does is trace the history of thefootnote from its (probably still unknown) beginnings through the rise ofmodern scientific history to the present chaotic situation of citation andpublication. The adjective Curiousserves to characterizethe effort, redeem itfrom failure, and make it an honest contribution, at least in the form ofdiversion for overworked and overspecialized historians.Those who are suspicious of books advertised as curious may fear thatGrafton'swill be a cute work, a trivialization of a scholarly subject,a satire onan obvious target. TheFootnote s anything but that. One might think of it as aset of elegant essays on historiographical subjects that have drawn theattention of the Princeton professor who has written Defenders f the TextandNew Worlds,Ancient Texts.He lets his mind and chapters-and eventually ourcuriosities-wander with apparently aimless ease to confront familiar andunfamiliarhistorical work alike.Graftondoes not explain himself in detail as he meanders from the recent ( )past, with Leopold von Ranke as his example, back through the philosophesand beyond some ecclesiastical historians to Renaissance times. Withouttrying to make much of a thesis for the whole book, he grounds it at the end inthe beginnings: "The CartesianOrigins of the Modern Footnote."On occasion lighthearted and sometimes humorous, Grafton has not cho-sen this genre to display wit or satire so much as to chronicle its presence orabsence. He does not overly involve himself in the endless and irresolvabledisputes about where to locate footnotes or endnotes, though he does tip hishand. Curiously, he does not seem to notice that some chapters deal withauthors who, while they stressed "scientific" historical documentation, didnot make much use of footnotes.Why review this book in ChurchHistory?Fortwo good reasons:It is hard topicture any historian concerned with things sacred or profane who would notfind her or his curiosity aroused or pulse quickened to the excitements thatcome with being a historian. And one of seven chapters is devoted to "TheAntlike Industry of EcclesiasticalHistorians and Antiquaries."The historians in that chapter include the polymathic GermanJesuit Atha-nasius Kircher, whom Grafton locates in Eusebian and Baronion Annales

    84949

    This content downloaded from 128.104.46.206 on Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:46:39 AMAll use subject toJSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/14/2019 3169931

    3/3

    850 CHURCH HISTORYtraditions, and various polemical Catholic and Protestant Reformation-erachroniclers and apologists. "Fromthe first, ecclesiastical historians wrote ascontroversialists and believers: as Jews seeking to prove the Toraholder thanHomer or as Christians determined to prove the priority of a doctrine or aninstitution" (156). They taught some negative lessons that took centuries forhistorians-some of them, at least-to unlearn, while in their care theycontributed to methods that were useful to less controversial and oftenbelief-neutral successors into our own time.

    Martin E.MartyThe University of Chicago, emeritus

    This content downloaded from 128.104.46.206 on Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:46:39 AMAll use subject toJSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp