22
Mam Tor Fieldclass Sunday 12 th March depart from Department at 8.45am Pick up Greenbank at 9am return approx. 6pm (depending on traffic) You will need: standard field gear mapping board • notebook • compass-clinometer • ruler • stationary • camera? • LUNCH

3 Slope Stability II( Indah)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

slope

Citation preview

  • Mam Tor Fieldclass Sunday 12th March

    depart from Department at 8.45am Pick up Greenbank at 9am return approx. 6pm (depending on traffic)

    You will need: standard field gear

    mapping board notebook compass-clinometer ruler stationary camera? LUNCH

  • Slope stability II

    EOSC316 Engineering Geoscience

  • Types of landslide

    Rock failure failure plane pre-

    determined

    Soil failure failure plane along line

    of max stress

  • Types of landslide

    Rock failure failure along pre-determined planes of

    weakness Soil failure

    failure along lines of max. stress frictional, cohesive = rotational frictional, incohesive = planar

  • Rotational landslip analysis

    For undrained frictionless failure total stress analysis

    For cohesive and frictional failure method of slices Bishops conventional method (can take into

    account pore water pressure)

  • Rotational slip

    total stress analysis or u = 0

    strength parameters are those of undrained soil

    whereF = restraining moment

    disturbing moment

    C = cohesive strength (Pa)r = slip circle radius (m)= slip sector in radiansW = weight of sliding sector (N)e = eccentricity of sliding sector (m)

    WeCrF

    2

    =

  • Method of slices

    Swedish circle method

    For use with cohesive and frictional soils

    += n

    n

    nn

    T

    NCrF

    1

    1tan

  • Effect of a tension crack

    Reduces the angle of the sliding sector

    Height of tension crack:

    For frictionless soil

    Chc

    2=

    C = cohesive strength (Pa)= unit weight of soil (N m-3) = friction angle

    +=

    245tan2

    Chc

    Cohesive and frictional soil

  • Location of slip circle centre

    No simple way trial and error

    F more sensitive to horizontal movements than vertical movements

  • Effective stress analysis

    GWL

    hP = h x f w

    L

    r

    += n

    n

    nnfn

    T

    LPNCrF

    1

    1tan)(

  • Other methods of analysis

    Taylors stability analysis used for frictional and cohesive soils uses a dimensionless number to iterate

    towards a solution Bishops method

    effect of forces on each side of slice considered

    iterative method

  • Landslip monitoring

  • Flowslides

    Soil, clay, rock debris may behave like liquid; water content is > liquid limit flowslide

    Flowslides are extremely mobile e.g. Yungay, Peru, 1970

  • Mt. Huascaran, Peru, 1970

    earthquake triggered flowslide

    hit towns of Yungayand Ranrahirca, 18 km away, at around 150 km/hr

    Yungay completely buried, 66,000 dead

  • Flowslide, Slumgullion, Colorado

    National natural landslide laboratory

    Major slip ~3500 years ago, present slip ~1000 years ago

  • The Mam Tor head scar looking west

  • Mam Tor landslide

    Occurred due to glacially oversteepenedslopes

    Age ~3600 years, from radiocarbon dating of tree remains recovered from boreholes

    ~300 m wide and ~1000 m long Upper part

    multiple rotation landslide Lower part

    debris flow

  • Cross-section through the Mam Tor landslip

  • Geological map and movements at each station- 1996 to 2002

  • Correlation of movements with rainfall

  • An analogue for sedimentation in half-graben.

    Derbyshire County Council is the transportation agent!

  • Mam Tor references

    Skempton, A.W. et al., 1989, The MamTor landslide, North Derbyshire, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. 329, 503-547

    Rutter, E.H. et al., 2003, Strain displacements in the Mam Tor landslip, Derbyshire, England, J. Geol. Soc. Lond.160, 735-744.