Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency
3rd Meeting of the EU IRRS Coordination Group and IAEA
EC-IAEA Agreement ENER/11/NUCL/SI2.588650
Status of the IAEA Activity
18 September 2012
IAEA
Outline
• Status of the Agreement
• 10 year IRRS Program
• Analysis of the Results of the Past IRRS Missions
• Criteria of Effectiveness and Efficiency of IRRS Missions
• Post-Mission Evaluation
• Series of Targeted Consultancies
• Status of the IRRS Guidelines
• Publication of IRRS information9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 2
IAEA
STATUS OF THE AGREEMENT
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 3
IAEA
Contracting
• 3-years Project, 10 year plans, original Agreement for one year (April 2011-2012)
• Extension to two years (April 2011-2013)
• Longer term contracting would be more useful for both parties
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 4
IAEA
Progress Reports
• Every six months• Due next October• Reflection/discussion
might be beneficial
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 5
IAEA
10 YEAR IRRS PROGRAM
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 6
IAEA
IRRS missions to EU
• ENSREG – IAEA MoU• DDG letter to the MSs• Not all MSs answered• Data from ENSREG WG1 • Uncertainties and contradictions• Expert Pool and National Coordinators• Recruitment for the recent mission
accordingly
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 7
IAEA
IRRS missions to EU (cont.)
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 8
Country Pre-period 1st m.
Pending follow-up
First mission
Follow-up mission
Comment
Op
erat
ing
NP
Ps
Belgium 2013, Q4 2015
Bulgaria 2013 2016, Q1
Czech Republic 2013 2016 ENSREG: fu-2015
Finland 2012 - 2015
France 2006 2014 2016
Germany 2008 ? ? ENSREG: 2021
Hungary 2015 2017
Netherlands 2014 ? No official letter, ENSREG: fu-2017
Romania 2011 2014/2015 2019 2022 New letter overwrote ENSREG
Slovak Republic 2012* - 2014
Slovenia 2011 - 2013/2014
Spain 2008 - - No first mission in the period (!!!)
Sweden 2012 - 2014-2016 ENSREG:fu-2014
United Kingdom 2009 2013 2019 2022
Oth
er in
stal
lati
on
s
Austria 2016* ? Or later, ENSREG: 2017-18, fu-2020
Denmark Last third Last third No date given , ENSREG: 2019-21*
Estonia 2015 2017
Greece 2012* ? ? Research reactor not included
Italy 2015 2017/2018 ENSREG: 2013-14, fu-2016 (!!!)
Latvia ? ? ENSREG: 2016*, fu-2018
Lithuania 2016 2018
Poland 2013* ? No follow-up indicated, ENSREG; fu-2015
Portugal ? ?
No
Inst
. Cyprus ? ? ENSREG: 2016*, fu-2019
Ireland 2015 2018
Luxembourg ? ? ENSREG: 2017-18*, fu-2020
Malta ? ?
? No official answer to IAEA
* Reduced scope mission
IAEA
Expert Pool
• Experts nominated from: • Nuclear countries: B, BG, CZ, D, E, H, RO, S,
SF, SK, SLO, UK• Countries with installation: A, DK, GR, LAT, LIT• Other: CYP, EIR, LUX
• No expert from France and Netherlands!• CVs from: D, H, E, RO, S, SLO• More CVs would be needed
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 9
IAEA
Expert Pool (cont.)
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 10
IAEA
Expert Pool (cont.)
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 11
IAEA
National Coordinators
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 12
EU Contact Points
Country Name e-mail
Belgium Thierry Maldague [email protected]
Bulgaria Alexander Rogatchev [email protected]
Czech Republic Petr Krs [email protected]
Finland Hannu Koponen [email protected]
France Isabelle Forest [email protected]
Germany Kai Weidenbrück [email protected]
Hungary Zoltanne Bodis [email protected]
Netherlands Aad Sedee [email protected]
Romania Camelia Liutiev [email protected]
Slovak Republic Karol Janko [email protected]
Slovenia Laura Kristančič Desman [email protected]
Spain Ivan Recarte [email protected]
Sweden Ingemar Lund [email protected]
United Kingdom Peter Addison [email protected]
Austria Helmut Fischer [email protected]
Denmark Kaare Ulbak [email protected]
Estonia Ilmar Puskar [email protected]
Greece Ms. V. Kamenopoulou [email protected]
Italy
Latvia Andris Abramenkovs [email protected]
Lithuania Sigitas Šlepavičius [email protected]
Poland Magdalena Szymko [email protected]
Portugal
Cyprus Panicos Demetriades [email protected]
Ireland Tom Ryan [email protected]
Luxembourg Patrick Majerus [email protected]
Malta Paul Brejza [email protected]
?
?
IAEA
ANALYSIS OF THE PAST MISSIONS
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 13
IAEA 9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 14
Basis of the Analysis – 2006 -2011
EU missions
United KingdomFranceSpainGermanyRumaniaSloveniaSwitzerland*UK follow-upFrance follow-upSpain follow-upGermany follow-up* I know, it is not EU, yet almost
Non-EU missions
JapanMexicoUkraineCanadaRussiaChinaUSAKoreaUkraine follow-upCanada follow-up
IAEA 9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 15
Mission Site Overview
IAEA
Primary data collected from the missions
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 16
IAEA
Observations
• Recommendation : non-compliance with IAEA Safety Standards
• Suggestion : a way of further improvement• Good Practice : unique feature worth of
recommending to others
• Note: R+S → Findings
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 17
IAEA
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
24 32 25 18 2 31 27 29 4 10 20 22 33 15 23 7 26 36 1 16 8 19 9 21 3 11 17 34 35 5 12 13 30 6 14 28
refe
renc
e/m
issi
on
Requirement number
Average number of references from recommendations and suggestions to GSR Part 1 Requirements (in decreasing order)
Eu missions all missions
Analysis of References
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 18
Conclusion: GSR Part1 may need revision
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
24 32 25 18 2 31 27 29 4 10 20 22 33 15 23 7 26 36 1 16 8 19 9 21 3 11 17 34 35 5 12 13 30 6 14 28
Cum
ulat
ive
rate
Requirement number
Cumulative reference rate of recommendations and suggestions
from largest from smallest
• 9 Requirements (25%) obtain almost 60% of the references
• 15 Requirements (~ 40%) have 80%
• The 12 (33%) least referenced Requirements have ~ 5%
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
24 32 25 18 2 31 27 29 4 10 20 22 33 15 23 7 26 36 1 16 8 19 9 21 3 11 17 34 35 5 12 13 30 6 14 28
refe
renc
e/m
issi
on
Requirement number
Average number of references from recommendations and suggestions to GSR Part 1 Requirements (in decreasing order)
Eu missions all missions
IAEA
Statistics of Observations
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 19
Follow-ups
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Nu
mb
er o
f o
bse
rva
tio
ns
Mission date
Correlation of observations
All observations R+S GP
Conclusions:• In most missions the total no.
of findings (R+S+GP) is within the range of 40-60
• The no. of R+S’s and GP’s are negatively correlated
IAEA
Statistics of Observations (cont.)
• Conclusion: The Modules related to the core regulatory activiti es (authorization, review and assessment, inspection) i nclude the highest number of observations. Module II and VIII are cons iderably less important, the distribution of the observations in t he other Modules is quite even →→→→ Reshaping of the Module structure might be consider ed
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 20
Observations EU non-EU Follow-up Summed
Recommendations 124 178 25 327
Suggestions 184 203 36 423
Good Practices 102 110 29 341
Summed 410 491 90 991
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI
rati
o
Module
GP/(R+S) for first missions
IAEA
Comparison of EU and non -EU missions
Conclusion: There is no essential difference between the EU and non-EU missions
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 21
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
to GSRPart1
to other No.ofR+S
nu
mb
er o
f re
fere
nce
s/m
issi
on
Average number of references and findings
EU missions
nonEU missions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Minimum Average Maximumn
um
ber
of f
ind
ings
/mis
sio
n
Ranges of observations in EU missions
Suggestions
Recommendations
Good practices
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Minimum Average Maximum
nu
mb
er o
f fin
din
gs/m
issi
on
Ranges of observations in all missions
Suggestions
Recommendations
Good practices
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI
ob
serv
atio
ns/
mis
sio
n
Module number
Average number of observations in EU missions
Recommendations Suggestions Good practices
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI
ob
serv
atio
ns/
mis
sio
n
Module number
Average number of observations in non-EU missions
Recommendations Suggestions Good practices
IAEA
Analysis of Observations
• Observations are sorted into Subject Groups in each Module
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 22
IRRS Modules
Mod S.G. Subject
1 a Co-operation/interaction among organizations, bodies
b National policies, strategies
c Providing resources to the RB
d Providing/using legal framework for regulatory activities
e Transparency, public involvement
f Prime responsibility for safety
g Building competence in nuclear safety
h Waste Management
x Other
y TO OTHER MODULES
2 a OE exchange with international community
b Relationship with international organizations
x Other
y TO OTHER MODULES
3 a Staffing of the RB
b Competence of the RB
c Resources of the RB (obtaining, using, extending)
d Organization of the RB
e Developing documents for regulatory activities and cooperation
f External involvement in the regulatory processes
g Training of the RB
h Decision making process, contents of decisions
x Other
y TO OTHER MODULES
4 a Developing an (integrated) MS, general
b Details of the MS, developing MS manual
c MS review and audits
d Safety culture
e Knowledge management and IT tools
f Managing organizational changes
x Other
y TO OTHER MODULES
IAEA
Analysis of Observations (cont.)
Conclusion: Co-operation and resources are major issues in many countries, legal framework is pronounced in some no n-EU countries
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 23
Subject groups in Module I. EU n-EU Total
a Co-operation/interaction among organizations, bodies 9 11 20
b National policies, strategies 7 4 11
c Providing resources to the RB 5 9 14
d Providing or using legal framework for regulatory activities 6 23 29
e Transparency, public involvement 3 3 6
f Prime responsibility for safety 1 3 4
g Building competence in nuclear safety 0 1 1
h Waste Management 0 7 7
x Other 0 2 2
y To be moved to another Module 5 0 5
Σ Sum of Recommendations and Suggestions in the Module 31 63 94
0
2
4
6
8
10
a b c d e f g h x y a b x y a b c d e f g h x y a b c d e f x y a b c d e f g h i x y a b c d e f g h i j k x y a b c d e f g h i j x y a b c d e f x y a b c d e f g x y a b c d e f g x
Findings/Subject Groups in EU missions
Recommendations Suggestions
Mod.III Mod.IV Mod.V Mod.VIMod.I Mod.VII Mod.VIII Mod.IX Mod.XII
IAEA
Analysis of Observations (cont.)
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 24
Subject groups in Module VII. EU n-EU Total
a Developing the inspection program/system 10 18 28
b Use of previous results 2 2 4
c Procedures and guidance 11 11 22
d Follow-up of inspections (monitor, evaluate, share) 3 6 9
e Preparation of inspection reports 3 1 4
f Site inspectors 0 3 3
g Inspector team composition 1 2 3
h Graded approach 1 3 4
i Medical Practice 8 0 8
j Waste Management 0 2 2
x Other 1 0 1
y To be moved to another Module 4 10 14
Σ Sum of Recommendations and Suggestions in the Module 40 47 87
Conclusions:• Development of inspection program and preparation o f the respective
procedures and guides represent the highest challen ge in Module VII.• The basis and techniques of the review of Module VI I might need
further development in order to include actual insp ection techniques and results into the scope of the review.
IAEA
Coverage and Positioning
Conclusion: Almost 8% of the findings appear in a Module not fully relevant to the nature of the finding. Guidance to the reviewers should be given in order to they contribute to the appropriate Module.
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 25
Mod.No.
I 2 95 0.02
III 4 91 0.04
IV 6 70 0.09
V 6 83 0.07
VI 4 85 0.05
VII 1 85 0.01
VIII 1 21 0.05
IX 2 98 0.02
X 4 54 0.07
Av 3.3 79 0.04
Ratio of ungrouped findings to the total numbers Un-
gr.
To-
tal
Ra-
tio
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
I III IV V VI VII VIII IX X
Conclusion: The Subject Groups introduced in this report seem to adequately cover the large majority of the IRRS findings
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
I III IV V VI VII VIII IX
Nu
mb
er
of
fin
din
gs
Module
Misplaced findingsfrom other Modules to other Modules
IAEA
Comparison with Previous Results
• ENSREG WG1 analysis of missions in 1998-2008• Forming common sets of the ENSREG and IAEA groupings
Conclusion: Results of analysis of earlier IRRT and IRRS mission s by ENSREG – although was performed with less resolution than the present one – are in a very good agreement with the results of t he present analysis
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 26
ID Common name IAEA ENSREG
No. % No. %
1. RB Background 76 13.9 54 12.2
2. Cooperation 33 6.0 20 4.5
3. Time constraint 5 0.9 4 0.9
4. Management System 48 8.8 46 10.4
5. Review and Assessment 23 4.2 23 5.2
6. Inspection and Enforcement 106 19.4 95 21.4
7. Other RB documents 29 5.3 16 3.6
8. Regulations and guides 48 8.8 58 13.1
9. Staffing 44 8.1 20 4.5
10. Resources 9 1.6 15 3.4
11. Competence 42 7.7 9 2.0
12. External support 24 4.4 18 4.1
13. Emergency preparedness 51 9.3 46 10.4
14. Operational Experience Feedback 6 1.1 11 2.5
15. Periodical Safety Review 2 0.4 8 1.8
IAEA
Report
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 27
IAEA
Analysis of Good Practices
• On-going• The hosts are asked to group the GPs:
1. You have applied as lessons learned from previous IRRS missions
2. You intend to apply as lessons learned from previous IRRS missions
3. You have applied independently of the results from previous IRRS missions
4. Not applicable for some reason
• Shall reveal the spread and the novelty value of the GPs
• Your country is kindly requested to contribute
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 28
IAEA
EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF IRRS MISSIONS
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 29
IAEA
Performance Indicators
1. Size of the IRRS team 2. Length of the mission report 3. Time available for the review of
the Advance Reference Material (ARM)
4. Number of advance written comments from the reviewers
5. Feedback from the team members on the quality of the ARM
6. IRRS experience of the team members
7. Feedback from the host country representatives
8. Feedback from the team members on the mission
9. Coverage of the pre-mission Action Plan of the host country
10. Number of issues found beyond those in the Action Plan
11. Balance of findings12. Conciseness of the mission
report 13. Completion time of the mission
report 14. Number of issues remained
open in the follow-up mission
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 30
IAEA
Values and Ranges
• Performance indicators may fall into the ranges:• Optimum• Acceptable• Needing attention
• The indicators are numerical• Relative distance from optimum:• Overall effectiveness is the average distance of PI’s:
• Optimum if ∆∆∆∆ = 0• Effective if 0 < ∆∆∆∆ ≤ 0.1• Acceptable if 0.1 < ∆∆∆∆ ≤ 0.2• To analyse if 0.2 < ∆∆∆∆
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 31
δδδδ = (x1-x)/x 1 Optimum range
x x1 x2
Actual value
Optimum range δδδδ = (x-x 2)/x2
x1 x2 xActual value
IAEA
Examples of Performance Indicators
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 32
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
E-fu D-fu AUS-fu CA-fu ROM KOR SLO CH UAE S
rati
o o
f m
em
be
rs w
ith
exp
eri
en
ce
missions
Team Experience
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00
Nu
mb
er
of
team
me
mb
ers
Size of first mission
Team size vs. missions size
Team size Linear (Team size)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
RUS US KOR SLO CH UAE S
Missions
Action Plan Coverage
β1 - findings in AP β2 - findings beyond AP
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
F-fu UK-fu UA-fu E-fu D-fu CAN-fu AUS-fu
Ratio of open issues in follow-ups
Recommendations Suggestions All
IAEA
An interesting PI – Balance of findings
ρ = √[( NR* NG)/ NAv(R*G)]
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 33
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
Tendency of findings (R vs. GP)
Recommendations Good Practices Balance
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
Balance of findings (R vs. GP)
IAEA
Mission Effectiveness and Efficiencies
Conclusion: It is rather reassuring that although there are per formance indicators that need attention in all missions, the overall performance of the missions in the great majority of the cases fal ls into the effective range
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 34
Indicators KOR D-fu SLO AUS-fu CH CAN-fu UAE S
C1 – Team Size 0.03 0 0.04 0.05 0 0.04 0.01 0
C2 – Report Length 0.11 0.15 0 0.13 0 0 0.24 0
C3 – ARM Review Time 0.13 0 0.16 0.13 0.18 0.30 0 0
C4 – Advance Comments - - - - 0.08 - 0 0
C6 – Team Experience 0.20 0 0.25 0.09 0.30 0.09 0.08 0.30
C7 – Host Feedback - - - - 0 - - 0.04
C8 – Team Feedback - - - - 0 - - 0
C9 – Action Plan Coverage 0.30 - 0 - 0 - 0 0.30
C10 – Beyond AP Coverage 0.02 - 0 - 0 - 0 0
C11 – Balance of Findings 0 - 0.16 - 0 - 0.07 0.16
C12 – Mission Report Contents 0 - 0.18 - 0.11 - 0.09 0.12
C13 – Report Completion Time 0 0.10 0.30 0 - 0 - -
C14 – Open Issues - 0.17 - 0 - 0 - -
Average Measure of Deviation (∆) 0.08 0.07 0.12 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.08
IAEA
Report
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 35
IAEA
POST-MISSION EVALUATION
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 36
IAEA
Prompt Evaluation Report Contents
• Basic Mission Data• Feedback from the Team members on the ARM
• Ratings (1 – 5) on three questions (Eff. Criteria No.5)• Characteristic comments• General conclusions
• Feedback from the Team Members on the effectiveness of the missions• Ratings (1 – 5) on five questions (Eff. Criteria No.7)• Characteristic comments• General conclusions
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 37
IAEA
Prompt Evaluation Report Contents (cont.)
• Feedback from the Host on the mission• Ratings (1 – 5) on seven questions (Eff. Criteria No.6)• Characteristic comments• General conclusions
• Overall evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the mission• Numerical values of the effectiveness and efficiency
Performance Indicators• Discussion and conclusions
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 38
IAEA
Evaluation Data
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 39
IAEA
Reports
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 40
IAEA
TARGETED CONSULTANCIES FOR ENHANCING EU MISSION EFFICIENCY
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 41
IAEA
Objectives
• Reviewing the orientations given by the EC and assessing their implications on the current IRRS programme
• Providing guidance to the host Country and to the IRRS team members for preparation to and conduct of the missions
• Setting guidance for the review process during the missions in order to ensure consistency in the depth and intensity of the review of various areas
• Providing guidance to the Member States for preparation of the advance reference material prior to the missions
The results are expected to be generally applicable, not only to EU missions
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 42
IAEA
Terms of Reference
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 43
IAEA
Topics
1. General issues in conducting a mission
2. Review of the legal, governmental and regulatory framework
3. Review of the management system
4. Review of regulatory activities related to NPPs (Mod. 5,7,8)
5. Review of regulatory activities related to NPPs (Mod. 6,11)
6. Review of regulatory activities related to facilities and activities other than NPP
7. Review of regulatory activities related to emergency preparedness and response, and to thematic areas in radiation safety
8. Elaboration of an EU specific IRRS module
9. Format and template of an IRRS report
10. Member State activities for preparations to host, conduct and follow-up an IRRS mission
11. Application of Good Practices
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 44
IAEA
Schedule and Participants
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 45
Consultancy data summary as of 08.08.2012
No Title pers days modules Date Room p1 p2 p3 p4 p5
1 General issues in conducting a mission 4 4 28.02 - 02.03 M0E70 Len Creswell Victor McCree Andrej Stritar Georg Schwarz
2 Review of the legal, governmental and regulatory framework 4 4 I, II, III 19 - 22.03 M0E61 Colin Patchett Karol Janko Erik Jende Shahid Mallick
3 Review of the Management System 3 3 IV 10 - 12.04 M0E70 Erik Jende Marta Ziakova Tero Varjoranta Cantemir Ciurea-Ercau
4 Review of the reg. activities related to NPP's, Part I 5 4 V, VII, VIII, IX 23-26.04 B0513 Francois Rinfret Laurent Kueny Thomas Wildermann Petteri Tiippana
5 Review of the reg. activities related to NPP's, Part II 4 4 VI, XI (R&A) 02-04.05 B0513 Jozef Misak Heikki Reponen Robby Gray Petr Krs
6 R. of the reg. act. related to facilities and activities other than NPP 5 4 xcutting, XI (trans) 18-21.06 G0E85 Peter Lietava Luc Baekelandt Jean-Paul Samain Frank Nitsche (Luis Jova Sed)
7 R. of reg. act. Related to EPR and to thematic areas in rad. safety 6 4 X, XI (rad.) 11-14.06 G0E85 Igor Grlicarev Karol Janko Pascal Guillaud Debbie Gilley Pascal Deboodt
8 Elaboration of an EU specific IRRS module 3 3 - -
9 Format and template of an IRRS report 5 4 24-27.09 M0E70 Erik Jende Jozef Misak Andrej Stritar Peter Lietava
10 MS preparations to host, conduct and follow-up on IRRS mission 5 4 05-08.11 B0513 Steve Evans Andreas Schefer Gustaf Lövenhielm Igor Grlicarev Jan Husatcek
11 Application of Good Practices 3 3
IAEA
Consultancy Reports so far
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 46
IAEA
Collected Recommendations
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 47
IAEA
Standard Mission Schedule
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 48
Time SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
9:00-10:00
Arr
iva
l o
f T
ea
m M
em
be
rs
Team building
meeting:
• 5 minutes/TM
self-intro
• Refresher
training
Entrance
Meeting
Inte
rvie
ws
Vis
its
Inte
rvie
ws
Vis
its
Inte
rvie
ws
Vis
its/
EP
R e
xerc
.
DT
C w
rite
s
intr
od
uct
ory
pa
rts
TM write Report
TL and DTL review
introductory part
• Discussing and
improving Draft
Report
• Cross-Reading
• TL, DTL, TC and
DTC read
everything
Free
day
, So
cial
To
ur
Re
ad
ing
, C
ross
-re
ad
ing
of
the
Re
po
rt
10:00-11:00
11:00-12:00 Draft text to TL
12:00-13:00
Lunch Lunch with
Host
Standing lunch Standing
lunch Standing lunch Standing lunch Standing lunch
13:00-14:00
Inte
rvie
ws
Vis
its In
terv
iew
s
Vis
its
Inte
rvie
ws
Vis
its/
EP
R E
xerc
ise
DT
C w
rite
s in
tro
du
cto
ry p
art
s Policy Discussions
Finalisation of the
Draft Report
14:00-15:00 Initial Team
Meeting:
• IRRS process
• Main
objectives
• Report writing
• Schedule
• First
observations
• In-Group
discussions
Inte
rvie
ws 15:00-16:00
Se
cre
tari
at
ed
its
the
re
po
rt
Pre
limin
ary
Dra
ft R
epo
rt
Re
ady
Cro
ss-r
ea
din
g b
y T
M
16:00-17:00
Written preliminary
findings delivered
17:00-18:00 Daily Team
Meeting
Daily Team
Meeting
Daily Team
Meeting:
Discussion of
findings
Daily Team
Meeting
Daily Team
Meeting
18:00-20:00 Informal
dinner Team Dinner Dinner Dinner Dinner Dinner Dinner Dinner
20:00-24:00 Writing of
the report
Writing of the
report
Secretariat
edits Report
TM write
Report
Writing of the
report TM Read Draft
Secretariat edits the
report
MON TUE WED THU FRI
9:00-10:00
Individual discussions
of Rs, Ss and GPs with
counterparts
Cross-Reading
TL, DTL, TC and DTC read
everything
Finalisation
Common read through
and finalisation by the
Team Discussion with Host
Submission of the Final Draft 9:00-10:00
10:00-12:00
Exit Meeting
Press Conference
10:00-12:00 Submission of the Draft
to the Host
12:00-13:00 Standing lunch Standing lunch Lunch Standing Lunch Lunch 12:00-13:00
13:00-15:00 Policy Discussions
Discussion of the
report by the
team
TC
, D
TC
pre
pa
re E
xecu
tiv
e
Su
mm
ary
an
d e
xit
pre
sen
tati
on
Ho
st r
ea
ds
Dra
ft
TL
fin
ali
ses
Exe
cuti
ve
Su
mm
ary
an
d e
xit
pre
sen
tati
on
TC
Dra
fts
the
Pre
ss
Re
lea
se
Written comments by the Host
Team meeting for
finalisation of the Report
Departure Home
13:00-15:00
15:00-17:00
Individual discussions
of Rs, Ss and GPs with
counterparts
15:00-17:00
17:00-18:00 Daily Team Meeting Discussion of Executive
Summary
Briefing of the DDG
Finalisation of the press
release
17:00-18:00
18:00-20:00 Dinner Dinner Dinner
Farewell Dinner
18:00-20:00
20:00-21:00 Secretariat includes
changes Secretariat finalises text Free
20:00-21:00
21:00-24:00 Free 21:00-24:00
IAEA
Standard Team Assignments
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 49
Team activitiesa) Smallh) Medium Large Follow-upg)
Team Lead (TL, DTL, TC, DTC)b)
3 3 3 3
Group A
Governmental R&F (mod 1)
Global nuclear safety regime (mod 2)
Interface with security (mod 12)
3c)
2c) 3
2c) Group B
Responsibilities of the regulatory body (mod 3)
Management system (mod 4)
Development of regulations and guides (mod 9)f)
3 3
Group C
Authorization (mod 5)
Review and assessment (module 6) 2
2 2
2 Group D
Inspection (mod 7)
Enforcement (mod 8)
2 2
Group E
Emergency preparedness (mod 10)
2
2 2
3
Group F
Other optional thematic areas (mod 11)
- control of medical exposures
- control of chronic exposures (radon, NORM and past
practices) and remediation
1 1
Facilities/Activitiesd)
Nuclear power plants
Radiation sources applications
Research reactors
Fuel cycle facilities
Waste management facilities
Decommissioning
Transport
- 2 5
Fukushimae)
Temporary, should be included in standard modules - 1 1 -
Administration 1 1 1 1
Total 11 19 23 11
a) Numbers of experts include IAEA staff, b) DTC is assigned to a Group, c) DTL supports Group Ad) For small nuclear programs the Facilities and Activities are to be reviewed by Groups C – F. Experts allocated to Facilities/Activities in medium and large missions may need to work together with the experts in Group F. For large programs the number of reviewers may be less than 5 according to the needs of the mission.e) The Fukushima module should be reviewed also for small programs and in follow-up missions even if there is no dedicated reviewer to thatf) Groups C through E review the respective contents of the regulations and guides (provided it is in the scope of the mission) and report to Group Bg) Numbers of experts of follow-up missions are relevant for large nuclear countries and should be adjusted for small non-nuclear and medium size nuclear countries according to the actual needs.h) Definitions:Small : No NPPs, few Facilities/Activities Medium : Less than 5 NPP units (in construction, operating, to decommission), few Facilities/ActivitiesLarge : 5 or more NPP units, and/or many Facilities/Activities
IAEA
STATUS OF IRRS GUIDELINES
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 50
IAEA
Current Guidelines Version
• Released in 2010, last revised in March 2011
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 51
IAEA
Recently Revised Version
• To be published soon
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 52
IAEA
Recently Revised Version
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 53
IAEA
New Version to be Elaborated
• Based on the results of the Targeted Consultancies
• With emphasis on practical guidance
• To elaborate in 2013
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 54
IAEA
PUBLICATION OF IRRSINFORMATION
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 55
IAEA
Shared Area for Consultancies
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 56
IAEA
Shared Area for this Meeting
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 57
http://gnssn.iaea.org/NSNI/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2FNSNI%2FShared%20Documents%2FOPEN%20Shared%20Files%2FENSREG%20IRRS%20CG%20%2D%20IAEA%20Meeting%2C%2018%2E09%2E2012&InitialTabId=Ribbon%2EDocument&VisibilityContext=WSSTabPersistence
IAEA
IRRS Homepage
• Under development• To access from RegNet ReSCoN• Three levels:
• Open Access Public Area (anonymous users), • IRRS Stakeholders Restricted Area (registered users), • IAEA Restricted Area (IAEA registered users);
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 58
IAEA
IRRS Homepage (cont.)
9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 59
IAEA 9/18/20123nd Meeting of the EU IRRS CG and IAEA 60
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION