3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    1/15

    Member-to-MemberRedistribution

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    2/15

    GIVEN

    Single story, single bay frame

    shown in the figure. In this frame,column marked as (1) is

    500500 mm while the other

    column is 400400 mm. Beam is,4002000 mm.

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    3/15

    GIVEN

    Moment-curvature diagrams of these two columns are as

    shown in the figure. The M-K diagrams are drawn for N1=150

    kN and N2=400 kN considering the effect of the lateral load.

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    4/15

    REQUIRED

    Assuming that the uniformly distributed

    load on the beam remaining constant,sketch the variation of the base shear inthe columns, as the lateral load increases.

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    5/15

    SOLUTION

    Since the beam is very deep, in the analysisit can be assumed to be infinitely rigid. Thismeans that the point of inflection will be at

    the midheight of the columns.

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    6/15

    EQUILIBRIUM

    N1 + N2 = 5 100 = 500 kN

    Taking moment about R and G;N2 = 250 + F

    N1 = 250 F

    Ignoring second order effects;

    V1 5 = M1V2 5 = M2

    V1 + V2 = F

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    7/15

    COMPATIBILITY

    1 = 2 =

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    8/15

    ELASTIC DISPLACEMENTS

    It is assumed that the columns reach their ultimatelimit states when, M=My,and after this stage plastic

    hinge fully forms. In the elastic stage, however, thecolumn flexural stiffnesses were calculated byassuming

    Icr= 1/2 Ic and Ec = 20,000 MPa

    Thus;

    For Column 1: EI= 50,000 kN/m2

    ,For Column 2: EI= 20,000 kN/m2

    Please note, the slopes of M-K diagrams

    correspond to the values given above.

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    9/15

    ELASTIC DISPLACEMENTS

    Hence,

    1

    1

    1 0001666053

    2

    2

    550000

    2M.

    M

    =

    =

    2

    2

    2 M0004166.05

    3

    2

    2

    520000

    M

    2

    =

    =

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    10/15

    M1

    /M2

    RATIO

    As 1 = 2 = , we can determine theM

    1/M

    2ratio:

    5.2M

    M

    M0004166.0M0001666.0

    2

    1

    21

    =

    =

    V1 5 = M1

    V2 5 = M2

    From equilibrium:

    therefore; V1 / V2 = 2.5

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    11/15

    AT THE FIRST YIELD

    As M1/M2 =2.5 Column 1 will reach the yield pointfirst.

    m.kN180Mandm.kN450MThus 21 ==

    N2 = 250 + F

    N1 = 250 F

    From equilibrium:

    therefore;

    kN1263690F

    kN.36VandkN90V:areforcesshearingCorrespond

    y

    21

    =+=

    ==

    N2 = 250 + 126 = 376 kN

    N1 = 250 F = 124 kN

    and: mm75)mm.N10450M(0001666.053

    2

    2

    550000

    M

    2

    61

    1

    1===

    =

    mm150y1 ==

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    12/15

    AT THE SECOND YIELD

    M1=450 kN.m(constant, cannot be increased)

    M2

    =250 kN.m

    From the moment curvature diagrams

    K2 =250/20,000 = 0.0125 1/mm

    /2 = 0.0125 5/2 2/3 5 = 0.10417 m = 208.3 mm

    V1 = 90 kN (sabit) , V2 = 250/5 = 50 kN ,

    F = V1 + V2 = 140 kN

    From equilibrium,

    N1 = 110 kN , N2 = 390 kN

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    13/15

    AT THE SECOND YIELD

    104150754505432

    2540090

    21 ...K... =+=

    K1 = 0.0183 rad/m

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    14/15

    RESULT

  • 7/30/2019 3 3 Member-To-Member Redistribution

    15/15

    RESULT