2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    1/21

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    2/21

    UNCLASSIFIED

    AD NUMBERAD510206

    CLASSIFICATION CHANGESTO

    confidential

    FROM

    secret

    AUTHORITY28 Feb 1973, per document marking, DoDD5200.10

    THIS PAGE IS UNCLASSIFIED

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    3/21

    THIS REPORT HAS BEEN DELYMITED

    AND CLEARED FOR PUBLIC RELEASEUNDER LOD DIRECTIVE 5200.20 ANDNO RESTRICTIONS ARE IMPOSED UPONI'3 USE AND DISCLOSURE.

    DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT AAPPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE;DISTRIBUTION t1'.1-IMITED.

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    4/21

    GENERALDE CLASS IFC T IOSCHEDULE

    INACCORDANCE WITHDOD 5200.1-R &EXECUTIVE ORDER 11652

    THIS DOCUMENT IS:Subject to General Declassification Schedule ofExecutive Order 11652.Automatically Downgraded at2 Years Intervals- DECLASSIFIED O DECEMBEk 31,1973

    ByPefense Documentation CenterDefense Supoly Agency

    Cameron StationAlexandria, Virginia 22314

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    5/21

    tAb -- -

    I.,

    r

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    6/21

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    7/21

    4DEPARTMENT OP THE ARMYWASHNGTON. OC. i1o

    IN Pr.PLY REIrFR TO

    A(,IA (M) (18 Jun 70) FOR OT UT 701211 29 June 1970,-I.JECI: Operational Report - Lessons Learned, Headquarters, 2d Infantry

    Division, Period Ending 31 January 1970 (U), n' the atlona

    'ilF.DISTRIBUITION:'.". : t o

    .. ,ubect report is forwarded for review and evaluation in aCcorddncewith paragraph 4b, AR 525-15. Information of ect.ons initiated as a,r.tslt of subject report should be forwarded to ACSFOR OT UT within 00

    S(da%- of receipt of covering letter.2. lIformation contained in this report is provided to insure. appropriatei.tnetfits in the future from lessons learned during current operations andmay be adapted for use in developing training material.

    [IY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF TH E ARMY:

    KNNETH G. WICIIAhic, tMajor General, USAThe Adjutant General

    h1S I'R I H'' ION :CoriTanditng Genera Is

    (". (.ontinental Army Conman&i>) Army Combat Developments Command

    CommandantsUS Army War CollegeUS Army Command and General Staff CollegeUS Army Armor SchoolUS Army Aviation SchoolUS Army Combat Surveillance SchoolUS Army Electronic Warfare SchoolUS Army Engineer SchoolUS Army Field Artillery SchoolUS Army Infantry SchoolUS Army Transportation School

    Copies furnished: Rrad unclassified when sepratdOffice, Chief of Staff, US Army -r

    tAv elWU" SEWa 20069 14

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    8/21

    SECRETI)isTRI BUTION (Con. d)DePL' Chiefs of StaffChiet of Research and DevelopmentAssistant Chiefs of StaffChief of EngineersCommandinug General s

    III Corps, ATTN: ProjeCL MASSTER2d Infantry Division

    Conwiandant of the Marine CorpsDefense Documentation CenterCommanding Of ficers

    US Army Limited War LaboratoryUS Army Logistics, Doctrine Systems & Readiness AgencyUS Army Mobility Equipment P-search & Development Center

    2

    SECRET

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    9/21

    SECRETDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYHEADQUARTERS 2D INFANTRY DIVISION

    APO SAN FRANCISCO 96224

    EAIDGO.O .SUBJECT: Operational Report of Zd Infantry Division for PeriodEnding 31 January 1970, RCS CSFOR-65 (RI) (U)

    THRU: Commanding General, I Corps (Gp), ATTN: EACICT-TAPO San Francisco 96358Commanding General, Eighth US Army, ATTN: EAGO-MH,APO San Francisco 96301Commanding General, USARPAC, ATTN: GPOP-DT, APOSan Francisco 96558

    TO: ACSFOR, Department of the Army, Washington, D. C. 20310

    1. (S) Section 1. Operations: Significant Activities.a. Increased Cavalry Troop Capabilities: General Order 524, datedZ4 January 1969, reorganized the 4th Squadron, 7th Cavalry under TOE17-105G. This reorganization increased personnel and equipment author-

    izations and enabled the Cav Sqdn to organize "D " Troop which was pre-viously at a zero strength level for personnel and equipment. The AirCay Troop now has operational control of one UH-lB and three OH-23Ghelicopters and is assigned two officers, three warrant offic ers, and 36EM. An additional UH-lB and UH-lD are operated and maintained by the2d Avn Bn pending an increase in the 4-7 Cav Sqdn maintenance capability.This reorganization essentially extends the capability of the squadron toperform its normal reconnaissance and security missions. While the troopconfiguration lacks an aero-weapons section, with projected assets the troopwill possess adequate command and control resources, an aero-scout cap-ability, and a limited lift capability for employment of an aero-rifle elementor quick reaction force. The troop has now initiated quick reaction force andaerial gunnery training.

    FOR OT UT701211 2006914Inclosure

    DOWURAN AT 3 YEAR IMTRVALIS;ISCLASSM AFTER 12 YEARS.SECRET 0 201

    A~

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    10/21

    SECRETEAIDGO-O 2 3 r,"SIJEC:T: Operational Report of Zd Infantry Division for Period

    Ending 31 January 1970, RCS CSFOR-65 (RI) (U)b. During the period 19-21 November 1969, the Zd Infantry Division

    ,(inducted a communications exercise designed to evaluate the adequacythe Division Tactical Communications System under normal operating

    ,cnditiu'n .. Additionally, the exercise served as a vehicle to aquaint!zfla::drS and staffs with the capabilities and limitations of the tactical

    0i,,11,uLications system available to them. All division radio nets andtactical radio relay and wire systems were utilized. The reliability oftih, t.Atical system as a whole was extremely high. Exceptions were the

    ,,,.,ut.icy, AM radio communications and off-line encryption systemsw..14A werk., experiencing a high deadline rate. The exercise providedexcellent training for communications personnel and pointed out that oper-

    p,.uieiency and equipment maintenance need additional emphasis.c. The POL restrictions implemented in November 1969, four months

    after the beginning of the fiscal year, were reflected in the operations andt-aining of the Division. Tactical operations wore reduced in scope and-1y t flinimum amount of training was conducted. A projection of POLr~jurrements indicated that even these essential activities would be reducedu lebs rn'licf was granted. Consequently an additional POL allocation wasre. ieted and approved. 12.5% increase in MOGAS allocation and a 6.45%increase in Diesel was allocated and should provide sufficient POL for theconduct (if essential operations and training for the remainder of the fiscalyear.

    d. T[he 2d Infantry Division has received six AN/PPS-5 radars. This.huld eventually replace the AN/TPS-33 and the AN/PPS-4 radarsin ail Zd Infantry Division units. The Army Electronics Command (ECOM)culiducLed a one week operations and maintenance course for this equipment*- December 1969. Two AN/PPS-5 radars are currently employed south ofthe IMJIN River in conjunction with operation KICKAPOO (Anti-agentsurveillance of IM.JIN River) and two are employed in locations forward ofthe IMJIN River to monitor North Korean activity. Initial reports fromradar operators have been favorable and indicate that readout from the twovisual scopes reduces operator fatigue and permits exact determination ofdirection and azimuth.

    e. During December 1969, a study was conducted to determine the extentof the North Korean infiltration threat in the 97th ROK Regimental CombatTeam (RCT) area of responsibility (AOR). In addition this study assessed

    BBest Available Copy SECRET

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    11/21

    SECRETEAIDGO-O 2 3 EEB:TSUBJECT: Operational Report of Zd Infantry Division for PeriodEnding 31 January 1970, RCS CSFOR-65 (RI) (U)additional measures which might be employed to counter the threat. Con-clusions were that the North Korean agent infiltration threat in this sectoris significant and the 97th RCT counter-infiltration posture should be improveto meet the future threat. To counter this increased infiltration threat, con-struction of a seven kilometer chain link fence was approved and is now beingconstructed by the 97th RCT along their front on the Han River vic BS 966817to BS 963858. Materials were provided mainly by Eighth US Army. Futureconstruction efforts will be directed towards construction of an IMJIN Riverbarrier, vic cord CS 002913 to CS 012902 and erection of 3-4 man observationtowers in high priority infiltration areas. The proposed IMJIN River barrierwill consist of an illuminated physical barrier system suspended from floatinbuoys. Lights will be mounted on every third buoy to illuminate the river anda complex of anti-swimmer fishhooks will be suspended at random lengthsbetween the buoys to prevent enemy agents from using the river as a meansof infiltration/exfiltration. Observation of this barrier wil be augmented bysearchlights positioned on the high ground on each shore.

    f. To increase the effectiveness of the barrier fence the following projectare in progress:

    (1) ARPA fence: An instrumented fence designed by Advanced ResearchProjects Agency (A R PA) has been installed in conjunction with the Chain Linkbarrier fence for evaluation along a three kilometer section of the 2-38th/1-23d Infantry sector along the DMZ. The ARPA fence is a six-strand barbedwire fence which sounds an alarm when any of the wires are cut, when apressure exceeding ten (10) pounde is exerted on the wires, or when thefence is short-circuited. Based on availability of funds and the results ofthis evaluation, additional ARPA fence may be installed within the 2d InfantryDivision.

    (2) Barrier Lighting: The Zd Infantry Division is attempting to augmentsurveillance of the barrier fence through the use of lights and at the presenttime approximately five kilometers of fence have been lighted using localresources. ARPA has expressed interest in construction of a lighting systemalong th. fence and plans to construct a two kilometer test section by1 October 1970. After evaluation of the initial test section is completed itis anticipated that an additional 22 kilometers of barrier lighting will beconstructed.

    g. Revision of the 2-9th Inf Bn (M) mission: The Z-9th Inf Bn (M ) hasbeen permanently employed north of the IMJIN River with one company on the3SECRET

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    12/21

    SECRETSA1Dco-o2 3FE[ .

    wI.J'CT: Operationa Report of Zd Infantry Division fo r PeriodEnding 31 January 1970, RCS CSFOR-65 (RI) (U)Sbatrrier since December 1968. To reduce the operational commitment o f the

    2-9th lhf (M) and toafford the unit additional time to conduct training, theni t was relieved of. its mission to maintain one company size force on theia.rrier, effective 15 December 1969. The Z-9th Inf (M) is now under the

    operational control of the 1st Bde which has also assumed the mission ofproviding security fo r LIBBY Bridge vic CT 096013 (performed by the 2-9thIrif (M)) and the responsibility fo r an extended TAOR (500 meters north of-iS'Yic CT 095017 extending southwest along Route lz to vic(.. Od48 )

    h. Re-habilitation of Guard Posts (GP): Rehabilitation of the eleven Guardi'sts ii the Zd Infantry Division sector of the DMZ, as outlined in the lastrvport, continued until inid-January when weather halted the constructionseason. At this time rehabilitation of two of the eleven Guard Posts (GP) hasheen completed. Rehabilitation of the remaining Guard Posts is approximate-,%/ completed. In addition a chain link fence similar to the barrier fence

    . Y",. : astructed around GP Lucy to provide additional security and pro-tctiurt. Chain Link fences will be constructed around six of the remainingrrua GPs, which are considered to be exposed and vulnerable.

    i. Direct Aviation Support: During this reporting period one additionalO1[-23G and four additional UH-1 aircraft were received by the Zd InfantryDwision bringing the Aviation Battalion total to 16 OH-23 and 16 UTH-I air-'r,.ft. Zd Aviation Battalion has now initiated direct aviation support andOl-Z'i aircraft are now provided on call to the Cormiauders of each infantry

    Div Arty, DISCOM, and the Engineer Battalion.j.- Minelearing: The Dong Nam Kae Bal Song Sa (Korean contractor)

    !t- minefield clearing operations and icra, :cz1lccting within the2d Infantry Division area north of the IMJIN River., This was accomplishedunder the rupervision of the Division Engineers. Approximately 7, 100 anti-personnel and anti-tank mines were cleared during this reporting period prioto the termination of mine clearing operations in mid- January due to thefrozen ground conditions.

    k. Observation Post Construction: During this reporting period the 2dEngineer Battalion constructed eight ground observation posts and two airobservation posts along the IMJIN River in the Division area.

    4

    SECRET

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    13/21

    SECRETEA1DGO-O 2,5 FE& 1SUBJECT: Operational Report of Zd Infantry Division for the PeriodEnding 31 January 1970, RCS CSFOR-65 (RI) (U)

    1. The organization and mission of the Counter Agent Company (CAC),consisting of approximately 200 KATUSA personnel are being revised togive this unit a Long Range Reconnaissance Patrol (LRRP) type capability.It is envisioned that under wartime conditions this unit would be employed astwelve LRRPs, initially by the use of the stay-behind patrols and exfiltratingby means of escape and evasion. A training program for 100 of the CAC personel was completed on 30 January at the Division's Advanced Combat TrainingAcademy (ACTA). These personnel will provide the nucleus fo r the LRRPplatoons and company headquarters. One Conventional Counter Agent platoonas well as a covert platoon will be retained in the unit's organization.2. (C) Section 2. Lessons Learned: Commanders Observations. Evaluations,and Recommendations:

    a. Personnel: None.b. Intelligence: None.c. Operation.:(1) Observation: Four anti-intrusion systems have been evaluated to

    determine the effectiveness of each system in countering infi/tration/ex-filtration attempts along the barrier fence. Systems evaluated were:Line Sensors, Surveillance- Target Acquisition-Night Observation (STANO),ARPA Fence, and Barrier Lighting.

    (2) Evaluation:(a) The Line Sensor System utilized Balanced Pressure Systems,Unattended Seismic Detectors, Infrared Intrusion Detectors, MultipurposeConcealed Intrusion Detectors, and associated equipment for relay and

    display of intrusion alarms. Evaluation of the system determined that:

    1 Effective surveillance of the system required more personnel thanwere originally required to man the barrier fence.2 Maintenance requirements were excessive.3 Infiltrators attempting to penetrate the system must be delayed for

    effective verification of sensor alarms.

    SEAET

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    14/21

    CONFIDENTIALEAIDGO-O 2 3 FEB 1970SUBJECT: Operational Report of 2d Infantry Division for Period

    Ending 31 January 1970, RCS CSFOR-65 (RI) (U)4 Present equipment is not ideally suited to weather conditions encounteredin Korea.(b) A test of the STANO system evaluated unattended ground sensors,

    radars, night vision equipment, and their effectiveness in supporting abattalion in mid-intensity conflict night operations. It was found that selecteditems of STANO equipment enhanced the effectiveness of the battalion; howeverfor this effectiveness to be maintained, augmentation above present TOEauthorizations for STANO equipment and improvements in the logistics systemare necessary. In addition, some items of STANO equipment require improve-ment from the standpoint of human factors, engineering, and performance.Night observation devices and searchlights are satisfactory as presentlydesigned, and are currently being used to augment the 2d Infantry Division'santi-infiltration mission along the DMZ.

    (c) An evaluation of barrier fence operations was conducted by thel-23d Infantry Battalion along its sector in October 1969. The evaluation wasconducted by having selected teams of experienced personnel attempt topenetrate the barrier fence. Attempts were made against the following system

    I Unlighted Non-ARPA Fence.2 Lighted Non-AR PA Fence.3 Unlighted A.RPA Fence.4 Lighted ARPA Fence.(d) Results of the evaluation indicated that the most effective barrier

    system consisted of a lighted ARPA fence. It is significant that no success-ful penetrations were made against any sector of lighted barrier fence and thelighted barrier fence alone proved more effective than the unlighted ARPA/Barrier Fence.

    (e) Comparison of the various anti-intrusion systems tested indicatesthat the most effective deterrent to barrier penetration attempts is a lightedbarrier fence.

    6CONFIDENTIAL

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    15/21

    CONFIDENTIAL.AlDGO_.O ? F"UbJET("I'; Operational Report of 2d Infantry Division fo r PeriodEnding 31 January 1970, RCS CSFOR-65 (RJ.) (U)

    (3) Rccommendation: That high priority be given to installation of atdai, lij:hting system across the 2d Infantry Divi,4ion sector.i. ')rganization: None.

    '.. Training: None.,.ogistics: Commercial Cargo and Dump Truck Services:

    i) ,bservation: Effective 1 January 1970, commercial cargo and dumptruck contractual services in the Division area were terminated.

    (2) Evaluation: Termination of commercial hauling has necessitatedtlic us of organic vehicles to perform'these services. The heavy usageof tactical vehicles for this service increases the end-cost, contributesI,, ig;her vehicle deadline rate, and decreases the degree. of vehicle

    ate,;,A readiness in the Division.(1) Recommendation: That when possible commercial cargo and dumpt.:uck contractor service rather than organic tactical vehicles be used to

    po rf rio bulk cargo hauling.g. Communications: None.h. Materiel: None.i. Other: None.

    -~. '7(MMANDER:

    2 Incl tIKLI N1. Div Organization--.---eh-ango im..-.-d and 'Staff AssignmeM&-.incI 2 wd HlQ, DACF: CINCUSAARPAC, ATTN: GPOP-DT

    CG EUSA, ATTN: EAGO-MH1

    Best Available COPYCONFENTIAL

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    16/21

    CONFIDENTIALEACICT-T (23 Feh 70) st Ind (C)SUBJECT: Operational Report of 2nd Infantry Division for Period Ending

    31 January 1970, RCS CSFOR-65 (R1) (U)DA, Headquarters I Corps (Group), APO 96358TO: Commanding General, Eighth US Army, ATTN: EAGO-MH, APO 96301(U) This headquarters has reviewed subject report. The followingcomments supplement the report:

    a. (C) Reference items concerning Operations, pages 5 - 7.(1) Paragraph 2c(2)(a)&: Concur in conclusions concerning LineSensor System as regards excessive personnel and maintenance requirements,verification delay and general unsuitability to the local area.(2) Paragraph 2c(2)(b): Concur in conclusions concerning STANOSystem evaluation.(3) Paragraph 2c(3): Concur in recommendation that high priorityhe given to installation of a barrier lighting system in the 2nd Divisionsector. At this stage of development of the barrier fence, this lightingis the single most important improvement yet to be made in increasing theeffectiveness of the barrier as a counterinfiltration measure.b. (U) Reference item concerning Commercial Cargo and Dump Truck

    Servioes, page 7, paragraph f. Concur. It is the understanding of thisheadquarters, that the contract was cancelled due to fund limitationsimposed by higher headquarters.FOR THE COMMANDER:

    FRED J. LESICAILT AGCAsagt AG

    8CONFIDENTIAL

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    17/21

    CONFIDENTIALI..,~ Full 70) 2d Ind

    ro l0onl.l .p2ort of 21I h'~: Jjtvijcr. I*~ ~~. ~~i~ L~ I t~tf4~ArqL~, AJC 'u""I 1 APR~ 70

    * .h*; --Wn suop1-rr-n~. thL r- . ;xrt.

    t- rux h -.. Co. -ar.~ I~ h: Ip .r abl,ri.. C 1L ft . r .u t *..

    r*.v~ w, th-1raial of sni'iect ... ui ziwrit, b,,- 2..1 1: ~rt ~Vic..V~ .sr~. U~ ~ techn:'c a) as .tar ce wo~ul , be ,rVidc y ~ ,*- .f:o('nbE- L. -L1r7.rL:

    :.-(- ., Vc.-W0J rc bL ' I~i. ,r.4i- t ans-i ,,A.nl:.. ;,;L ...a-- - on z.: ;& 41: r a. rour Iln, j ~ .. .."'acrce. co -- 'ntn c,..ncv.:-n~m::' .TA! 3v~1uwi2on. or...!* tiu-A cv:.duatio1 rcport c.Qt:nir.- conclucicrav -an r.co:: rida*0no-i:- baisic docLurIMnt hia~. been .- affef] and ..tmncurrt.d ;.1.L

    A~':. - nd indorsed cop.-. o! T.'C J 1-~]a.~inz.; t Wil]

    * ~ ~.: rLt c 'r,,Ln ev A;~b~ r .E ..Zi-r~ . '-'VFd cub. Ui:v'L 1.C~ -: L: 4II!'.* .~ t Utt. Adlvarced .c.%reh Prwjkc s ii 'cj (. )*r~

    * ~:..: .. v.of i.::Z barric r fumcL- i;htin(> by ctvbc~r 1%.'i' 2& r .~.r tArnekiloP.t~r section of A?.PA fence installed :'-or, The A~tPA , spe[entative, Korea,, has b,~':: :qu..L. APA 'fund the inistallation of eight al' tiorni k.:.tvr-of A2?A .'encc. A total of 30 k~o:~- '~of ' AL.A o'~~ 1,*.~.~:-4 th kr,rr by r A2A I a:,, rvtm,., actioni will bt. r-* ..)ri~

    ile 1ror. !on. 'r addition,.1 A.? ec i-A l--

    at 2f; and 1st nd, p, -.1L - ara b. Co.-!cur. :L *

    CO9DETA Best Available Copy

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    18/21

    of' co. trictual trucking, osrvices wan a coi~ined r. stit ofl' 1,,ndin,; Con-t ri ri s an 1 dc.sire to make mnaximum utilisation of admrnistvric,!,ve vchiclcs1,-, 'r-n:.-)Yvtation '.'otor Pools (CAM). qo~ever, surfici~nt .T?? assetswu~nut av.-Alahle to satisfy all demnands. A rt~view of ovi rall contractualtruckin: service support requirements for FY 71 , 1 ligto Y7 x* ~: ecedteis now in orfrecn. A continuing~ revitwidl, be maleol' 7jv. hi cle utilization in relation to contractual. requirenicnts tor(Acuce ov' rail use of' tactic:-1. vrhicles for -Ycn.ral &IAdistrrative !)ur .ont!,koncvcr ,-,o.-,ible.

    INt '-Ir C'rWO!ER:

    f~~trnished:2,I '.orpz (Gp), APO 96358 ( 'donly)C d Inf i)iv, A11O 95221 (Tn.-& only)

    10Be

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    19/21

    GPOP-DT (23 Feb 70) 3d Id (U)SUBJECT: Operational Report of HQ, 2d Infantry Division for Period

    Ending 31 January 1970, RCS CSFOR-65 (Ri)HQ, US Army, Pacific, APO San Francisco 96558 is A 70TO: Assistant Chief of Staff for Force Development, Department of the

    Army, Washington, D. C. 20310This headquarters concurs in subject report as indorsed.FOR THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF:

    CHARLES E. MLt Col, AGCAsst AG

    11

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    20/21

    SECRETORGANIZATION OF THE 2D INFANTRY DIVISION

    1ST BRIGADE 2D BRIGADE 3D BRIGADE1-23 Infantry 1-38 Infantry 1-9 Infantry2-72 Armor 3-23 Infantry 2-23 Infantry (M )2-9 Infantry (M) 1-72 Armor

    4TH BRIGADE **497TH (ROK) RCT SUPPORT COMMA*1-31 Infantry 1st Bn, 97th RCT HHC & Band2-38 Infantry 2d Bn, 97th RCT 2d Admin Co

    3d Bn, 97th RCT 2d S&T Bn298th Arty Bn (105)(T) 2d Med Bnlit Recon Co 702d Maint Bn2d Recon Co (OPCON) 2d Avn Bn1st Engr Co (less OPCON)

    DIVISION ARTILLERY DIVISION TROOPS1-15 Arty (105) (T) 4-7 Cav Sqdn7-17 Arty (105) (T) 2d Engr Bn5-38 Arty (105) (T) 122d Sig Bn6-37 Arty (155) (8"1) HHC, 2d Inf Div1-12 Arty (H J) 2d MP CoCounter Agent Co

    2d MI Det

    *1-31 Infantry from 7th Infantry Division under operational control of the4th Brigade.

    **Brigade Headquarters from 7th Infantry Division under operational controlof 2d Infantry Division.

    ***97th ROK RCT from 32d ROK Division under operational control of 2dInfantry Division.

    12Incl I SECRET

  • 8/2/2019 2d ID Lessons Learned 29 Jun 1970

    21/21

    UNCIASSI F1EDsocu-i~ mtm~~ct

    DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA.- R& D(Set Uity tesa# ca at$* title *Eabotet,, a" lade . anat~ion mustIN onto t When time eral rIJ to . -'9011uINm~AayINo ACTIVITV (Cealo wta) FIE P6 sirtrciju I C% At~,i -c& bFHQ, OACSFOR, DA, Washington, D.C. 20310 111.GRUS IP.N TI71L a/

    Operational Report - Lessons Learned, HQ, 2d Infantry D1'rision4 DESCRtIPTIVE NOTE3(7pe aand l~glw dfoo)

    IExperiences of unit engaged in counterinsurgencyoperations, 1 Nov 69 to 31 Jan 70,

    CC 2dO I f aner ym i visont. IaO.or

    aEFS

    1.RPR8DTET.OTAL NO, 0- PA(ffS Il.*0 FRF%a. CONTRACTY Of t GRANT' NO . R8OIIAO'POIFI NUMSERtS1

    L. IROJET No/A701211C . S. OTH90 REPORT mOIS1 (Any othe niimbeve tat mor be assignedofD eport)

    10. OISTO41OUTION STATEMIENT

    It. SUPPLEMENIARY NOTES ~IS. SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVI 1 1N/A OACSFOR, DA, Washington, D.C. 20310

    18. ABSTRACT

    13DD I . eel1473 UNCLASSIFI ED

    security Ch~.ssmfication