Upload
barnard-washington
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
29 July 2008
Narrowing the Gap
Proposition to LSP Delivery Group
July 2008
Kersten England/Andrew Pitts
Item 3
2
Basic Premise
• Narrowing the Gap remains a key commitment of all Partners within the LSP
• NTG to be embedded in strategy, planning and performance managementFor the Borough (LAA)For organisations (Corporate Plans)For services (business plans)For individuals (performance appraisal)
3
Five Dimensions
• Making the Case
• Approach
• Focus
• Resources
• Timelines
1. Making the Case
• Emphasis on Prosperity of the whole Borough
Economic
Social
Environmental
• Emphasis on Personalisation and Choice
Customer/User/Citizen
• Emphasis on independence, self reliance, responsibility
4
Examples
• Work on skills acquisition with NEETS – labour market supply, decreased benefit dependency, increased local revenue and spend
• Early targeted interventions with groups susceptible to development of chronic health conditions (chronic heart disease, respiratory, diabetes etc)
- Getting upstream on costs of care, decreased benefit dependency
5
Examples
• Tackling disproportionate involvement of young people from specific communities in anti-social behaviour
- Reduction in fear of crime reduces isolation, increases perceived safety and usage of public space including town and village centres, boosts night time economy etc
6
Examples
• Provision of affordable housing in rural areas- Sustainable communities
- Retention of local labour
- Resilient housing market
7
2. The Approach
i. Equitable access to appropriate services
consultation/engagement/needs assessment
market research/market penetration
co-design
personalisation and choice
equality impact assessments
8
2. The Approach (cont’d)ii. Tackling differential outcomes
Targeted specific interventions
Review and Redesign of provision
iii. Building a solid evidence base
demographics
socio-economic
locality specific – SOA level
community of interest specific
trends data
9
2. The Approach (cont’d)
iv. Embed in planning and performance management
- LAA blocks
- Corporate organisational priorities
- Business units
- For individuals
10
3. Focus• Each thematic partnership reviews NTG dimension of
indicators within total set of 198 which relate to their activity
• Priorities drawn from 33 indicators for safer and stronger, children and young people, healthier communities and older people, environment and economy
• Identification of shared priorities • Reflected in action plan for indicator delivery• Reflected in associated strategies
11
4. Resources for Delivery
• Base, Area Based Grant, other external funding
streams, income/additional revenue
• Policy, Equality, Cohesion, Community Engagement,
VCS, specific responsibilities and contributions
• Equality Frameworks (eg Equality Standard for Local
Government) and Comprehensive Area Assessment
• Embedded within all workloads.
12
5. Timelines for Delivery/Impact
1. Short
- Transform approach to access to services
- embed NTG within Borough planning and
performance management
13
5. Timelines for Delivery/Impact(cont’d)
- Enhanced engagement and involvement of communities of interest and locality.
- Some safer, cleaner, greener, stronger agendas
14
5. Timelines for Delivery/Impact(cont’d)
2. Medium
- Education and Skills
15
5. Timelines for Delivery/Impact(cont’d)
3. Long Term
Requiring significant societal change/behaviour/ lifestyle changes/infrastructure investment
Health
Housing
16
PropositionThe Golden Thread
17
Proposition
• Each thematic partnership identify NTG focus
• Supported by shared development of policy and best practice via LSP research and intelligence hub (new)
• Supported by skills expertise from VCS, equality and engagement facilitators
18
Timescales
• By December 2008 each thematic partnership to have developed case and action plans for NTG within delivery of LAA2.
19